THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 6/14/2022
Is it quasi-religious fanaticism?
Those on the right (in more ways than one) may benefit from understanding
the base (in more ways than one) motives driving the various “crusades”
perpetuated on America. Those on the progressive left will likely reject, ridicule
and/or rationalize against accepting this perspective:
It is no coincidence that, while denigrating the role of traditional
Judeo-Christian religion in personal, community and national well-being and
stability, the leftist paradigm cannot exist without many of the supposed trappings
and characteristics of religion: faith in things not seen, unquestionable
authority, personal fulfillment in being part of a belief system, a cult, if
you will.
The pattern is evident in abortion and so-called “reproductive health
rights”; global warming/climate change/environmental sustainability; gun rights
and violent gun crime; and deference to, and presumed beneficence of, problem-solving
by government. Throw in the identification and vilification of those deemed
enemies of those sacrosanct and (questionably) virtuous goals—including dissent
from “health mandates,” election and political narratives—and let the
dehumanizing begin.
Headlines in just the last week fall into such patterns, which “middle-of-the-road”
independents should consider when evaluating the right/left disputes. Included:
Mass shootings, abortion judicial decisions, the investigation (partisan to the
core) of the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol protests and riots, gas and energy price
spikes; also, whether the economy is headed for “stag-flation,” recession and
inflation or, as our teleprompter-reading, mumbler-in-chief tells us, “It’s
doing great.”
We’ll get to the Jan. 6 Soviet-style “show trials” but first, let’s apply
it to the abortion issue. The center-right majority, a solid 60+percent of
Americans, thinks abortion restrictions are reasonable, given the biological
fact of human (not cat or monkey) life in the womb. Democrats used to affirm
that abortion should be “safe, legal and rare,” but then they dropped the “rare”
part.
The “Roe” decision itself allowed for restrictions in the third trimester
when the fetus could live outside the mother. You would think Roe enshrined only
the fanatical “abortion rights” position of no restrictions up until birth. The
vast majority of screaming pro-abortion protesters likely live in “blue” states
where no restrictions will pass.
However, the “tell” that this is quasi-religious hysteria is the
uncompromising insistence that no state be allowed to pass laws its voters prefer;
only by prevailing in the top-down judicial rigidity of their demanded Supreme
Court decision will they be pacified.
Many have said that abortion is the left’s devotional sacrament but it is
much larger than just abortion. While most Americans believe and practice traditional
courtship, resulting in either monogamous couples or marriage, the cultural
left believes in the sexual and social “hookup” free-for-all, without
consequences for such libertine behavior. While “protection” is abundantly
available in stores everywhere, it’s a matter of faith to those worshiping
sexual profligacy that abortion accompany such “freedoms.”
Those of us upholding personal responsibility as a necessary virtue are
demonized and ostracized to the extent that the fanatical, hysterical
pro-abortion side ignores state and federal law prohibiting protests and
demonstrations at the personal residences of judges, threats to whom have
increased 400 percent. Laws were necessary because…the Ku Klux Klan routinely intimidated
judges who might find a Black man not guilty because the evidence said he didn’t
do the crime.
Are such protesters proud to stoop so low outside judges’ homes that they
share the perfidy of the Ku Klux Klan? Had justifiable arrests ensued from the
start, it’s doubtful that a California man would have taken his weapons and
hostage-taking tools to Justice Kavanaugh’s home; only lack of fleetness of
foot, and observant marshals, prevented the first-ever assassination of a
Supreme Court Justice.
This explains the hateful violence inflicted on pro-life centers around
America, the leftist media’s lack of outrage, and the tacit approval of this by
those revering the slaughter of life in the womb.
It’s likewise a matter of quasi-religious faith that the problems with
gun violence are the inanimate objects that have never taken themselves from a
shelf or locker and done harm: meaning guns, especially so-called “assault
rifles” which anti-2nd Amendment fanatics cannot define. They could
be taken seriously if they proposed something that would have prevented any
recent shootings, but they only want to restrict the rights of law-abiding
people.
The anti-gun crowd is invested in their crusade against the “right to
bear arms,” which has always been subject to criminal justice restrictions. Now
it’s “red flag laws” to be implemented in non-judicial manner, and dependent on
the same people that enforced mask mandates, workplace and business lockdowns,
and abolished church attendance. No thanks, their record of abuse stands.
Ban the guns, they insist, and crime and murders will stop; hasn’t
happened in history but they righteously believe in ordering us about. Consider
only that they dispute the plain, evident facts that the places with the most
gun controls—urban areas like Washington, D.C., Chicago, New York City, etc.—have
the most gun crimes per capita; it’s just the opposite in rural counties. It’s another
“faith-based” social engineering crusade against our God-given rights.
Likewise, the “human-caused global warming” fanatics are arguably earth-worshipers,
so smug and self-righteously assured of their monopoly on “truth” that they 1)
demonize those who disagree; 2) refuse to accept natural variations and
geological records of higher and lower CO2 and temperatures, in no correlation;
3) demand we suffer under energy shortages, and expensive, unreliable wind and
solar; and 4) advocate eliminating, for purely quasi-religious reasons, the
only dependable energy: coal, natural gas, hydro and nuclear.
Every utterance, message, assertion and conclusion coming from the Jan. 6
committee is either a bald-faced lie, one-sided partisan manipulation, or
massive exaggeration—to which few Americans give any credence.
No comments:
Post a Comment