Showing posts with label government waste. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government waste. Show all posts

Monday, September 12, 2022

Biden Admin Issues Final Rule to Dismantle Trump’s ‘Public Charge’ Policy

President Joe Biden and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas look up during a virtual bilateral meeting with Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez from the White House in Washington, on March 1, 2021. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

Biden Admin Issues Final Rule to Dismantle Trump’s ‘Public Charge’ Policy

By Jack Phillips
 
0:003:49

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Thursday issued its final order rescinding the Trump-era “public charge” rule that limited the benefits for immigrants who obtained public assistance benefits like Medicaid and food stamps.

The Biden administration reportedly stopped enforcing the rule within months after President Joe Biden took office.

“This action ensures fair and humane treatment of legal immigrants and their U.S. citizen family members,” said DHS Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas. “Consistent with America’s bedrock values, we will not penalize individuals for choosing to access the health benefits and other supplemental government services available to them.”

The new rule is slated to go into effect on Dec. 23.

“Public charge” rules have been a concept in immigration law for decades, referring to someone who is considered likely to rely on welfare programs as a condition to deny someone permanent residency.

Under the Biden administration’s rule, green card applicants are only considered a public charge if “they are likely at any time to become primarily dependent on the government” for assistance. Homeland Security will not consider public charge determinations for family members of the applicant who are getting government assistance.

Immigrants can receive benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps, as well as receive benefits provided by the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Medicaid, housing benefits, benefits related to immunizations or testing for communicable diseases, or any other supplemental or special-purpose benefits, according to DHS.

But the new rule will factor in a “noncitizen’s prior or current receipt of Supplemental Security Income (SSI); cash assistance for income maintenance under Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); State, Tribal, territorial, or local cash benefit programs for income maintenance (often called ‘General Assistance’); or long-term institutionalization at government expense” in considering whether the individual is a public charge, according to the DHS.

More Details

About 1.5 million households with at least one non-citizen member get food stamps, and another  1 million receive Medicaid benefits, according to the rule published Thursday.

US seeks to curtail green cards for immigrants on public aid
Pedestrians crossing from Mexico into the United States at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry wait in line in San Diego, Calif., in a file photo. (By Denis Poroy/AP)

The Trump administration rule had defined a public charge as an immigrant who gets one or more designated public benefits for more than 12 months and within a 36-month period. Officials in the Trump White House said that their rule protected U.S. taxpayers from undue burdens caused by foreign nationals who couldn’t financially support themselves.

“The principle driving it is an old American value, and that’s self-sufficiency,” Ken Cuccinelli, the former acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), said in a 2019 interview with Fox News about the Trump rule. “No one has a right to become an American who isn’t born here as an American,” he told NPR around the same time.

In June of this year, the Supreme Court dismissed a bid by Republican state officials to take over the legal defense of the public charge rule.

It came after an appeal by 13 Republican state attorneys general led by Arizona’s Mark Brnovich who sought to defend the rule in court after the Biden administration refused to do so. The state attorneys general had hoped to ask lower courts to throw out decisions that sided with various challengers to the rule, including a number of Democratic-led states.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/biden-admin-issues-final-rule-to-dismantle-trumps-public-charge-policy_4718741.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=BonginoReport

Friday, May 6, 2022

Use Biden’s Student Loan Rich Jerk Giveaway to Destroy Academia

Use Biden’s Student Loan Rich Jerk Giveaway to Destroy Academia

Kurt  Schlichter

We need to do everything we can to ensure that the Crustacean-in-Chief folds to the left again and decides to pay-off his constituency of affluent, sexually dysfunctional college loan debtors – throw us in that briar patch, you desiccated old pervert! Now, you may be confused if you watched my Townhall VIP “Stream of Kurtiousness” video last Friday expressing, in an unrelenting stream of naughty words, how infuriating it would be to reward dumb people at the expense of people who were not dumb. But we cannot be carried away with emotion. This is a golden opportunity to raze academia as currently constituted and sow the campuses with salt.

That most of the deadbeats who want you to pay their bills won’t be able to figure out that reference is itself sufficient reason to consign academia to oblivion.

Let’s understand what academia really is – a network of colleges and universities that provide nearly meaningless credentials mostly to upper middle class post-adolescents in exchange for tons of money and access to their soft, malleable minds for indoctrination in the current commie consensus. Unless you are going to Hillsdale or the like, you are not getting what they are selling – a mind-opening experience where you will learn to think as you become an educated citizen. More likely, you will get a piece of paper certifying your readiness to take your place as a cog in both the corporate and cultural machines.

Academia, outside of some STEM research (though STEM is being decolonialized and unpatriarched and generally turned into a joke like Transgender Medieval Karaoke Studies is, except with a little math – and don’t worry, there are no right answers because right answers are racist), is useless and a drain on society. Four-year college is a four-year intense brainwashing session broken up by bouts of drinking and fumbling sex with other students of all the 673 different genders. The purpose, besides to render you docile and eager to conform, is to provide a safe and lucrative sinecure for millions of faculty and administrators, living high off the hog and unaccountable thanks to Uncle Sucker’s student loan guarantees.

Not surprisingly, when the government offered free money to students, the universities cranked up the prices to exactly what the government would fund. That the student ended up on the hook was no biggie – totally protected from any sort of accountability for graduating a generation of useless basket cases fit only for fetching lattes and crying about how their penis and/or vagina makes them sad because they want the one they don’t have, academia betrayed the kids by touting how their useless credentials would open doors for them, but sadly it is often the front doors to the local Starbucks when the grads draw the opening shift.

The government offered money and the schools raised the prices – no one is more of a capitalist than a collegiate communist.

Now, morally we should make the stupid students pay back every red cent that they foolishly borrowed. But the Democrats want to pay off their graduate constituents – weird how suckers and dummies are always Democrat constituents – and “cancel college debt.” Let’s leave aside the first problem, that the Constitution does not provide the alleged president with a magic wand to make people’s private bills disappear. For one thing, that seemingly dispositive fact might not matter. How do you stop him? Sue? Who sues? Who has standing to sue? Maybe someone who spent good money on law school could tell you. Regardless, even if we can’t stop this, we might not want to.

I mean, if Brian Stelter, who is a potato, was walking footloose and fancy free toward a bunch of hungry Irishmen, would you yell “Yo Tater, watch out for the micks!” or would you pull up a chair and a bag of popcorn and watch the fun begin.

That’s kind of where we are here, because if Grandpa Badfinger decides to decree that the current crop of student loan debtors will have their debts for their degrees paid off by the rest of America, including people who did not take out dumb loans or who paid theirs off, the righteous fury is going to be glorious. That dust puppet in the Oval Office might well be opening up the Overton Window, and I say we defenestrate him and his whole party.

People will be livid, and they will be calling for reform. Oh, and we should be all for reform. We should reform academia from a commie conformity machine into something at least marginally useful to society. As Elon Musk recently pointed out, you can get all the hard knowledge you would ever get in college online for free. The argument for college is that you get intangible educational experiences, like arguing about Plato with a world renown professor under an oak tree in the quad. But that’s not a thing. Instead, you sit in a lecture hall with a thousand other saps listening to some pony-tailed grad student demand you respect xis pronouns.

Most of the other intangible experiences include waking up wearing someone else’s pants and needing Advil and a shower.

As a society, we need to stop paying for that. We need to move to a system that does not take you out of society for four to eight years, depending on your degrees, and instead focuses on imparting the knowledge you need for your chosen profession. And we need to ensure everyone has skin in the game except those of us with no investment in a particular student’s future. If the young scholar wants to take a loan, fine. We – the government – are out of it. Make it eligible for discharge in bankruptcy. Of course, lenders will then care about their investment since We the People are no longer cosigning. So, that young scholar will have to justify why The First National Bank of Savings and Loans should risk its dough on a Maori Patriarchy Painting major’s future earnings.

It won’t. In fact, as the (seemingly) free money dries up, students will become pickier consumers. Colleges will need to compete by providing value – and value will no longer just be a piece of sheepskin after four years. Yeah, lots of colleges will go under. The big, formerly prestigious ones won’t – some people will always want to begin every conversation reminding us that they went to Harvard – but we have something for them too. We need to tax their endowments. Call it reparations for the massive damage the Ivy League has done to America.

We need to use the righteous fury that will ensue in response to the total moral abortion that is canceling student loan debt. We might not be able to stop President Worsethancarter, but we can take this huge political error and make something out of it that doesn’t suck. We can use it to pop the political pimple that is academia.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2022/05/02/use-bidens-student-loan-rich-jerk-giveaway-to-destroy-academia-n2606586

Friday, February 11, 2022

Biden Attempts Reset #3 in Two Weeks, Fails Comically

Biden Attempts Reset #3 in Two Weeks, Fails Comically

Screenshot via YouTube

As Presidentish Joe Biden’s overly ambitious agenda continues its lingering death in the Senate, he’s tried at least a couple of “resets” in recent weeks to change public perceptions about his flailing and failing White House occupancy.

Reset #1 was Biden’s final, personal push to get Build Back Bolshevik and his Democrats’ Right to Cheat at Voting bills through the Senate, and/or bulldoze the filibuster. No dice.

Reset #2 was Biden’s marathon press conference, meant to instill confidence that our senescent chief executive was still in full possession of his faculties. That didn’t go over so well, either.

There’s also an ongoing effort to get him out from the White House more often, including a trip to Pennsylvania last week to tout his infrastructure bill. A local bridge collapsed just as he arrived.

This guy has got the Merde Touch, but Team Biden just won’t quit.

Welcome to Reset #3: Gun Control.

Longtime Sharp VodkaPundit Readers™ are probably old enough to remember when then-candidate Biden promised to make perennial Texas loser Robert “Beto” O’Rourke his gun control czar. O’Rourke gained fame on the Left and notoriety everywhere else with his 2019 campaign pledge, “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47.”

But even Team Biden, deep in their progressive Reality Denial Field, knew that bringing O’Rourke on board was a non-starter. Currently, O’Rourke is still back in Texas, pretending to run for governor while happily soaking up campaign cash from suckers across the country.

Team Biden understands that gun control is a losing issue for them. That’s why they didn’t try a big push for it a year ago, when Slow Joe was still riding high in the polls.

That’s why this latest reset won’t work.

But, like most anything Biden-related, it’s at least good for a few laughs from those of us who aren’t trapped inside the Reality Denial Field.

Here’s the latest, in which Biden claimed that a “Glock with 40 rounds” is really a “weapon of war.”

Yeah, no.

Also for Our VIP Members: Not Content with Destroying U.S. Economy, Biden Now Destroying Ukrainian Economy

Here’s the thing with these resets — and it’s one of the Left’s traditional strengths that can sometimes turn around to bite them on the you-know-what.

The Left excels at establishing, maintaining, and growing narratives. We’d be here all day if I were to start listing examples, so let me give you one big one: “FDR ended the Great Depression.”

No. According to a couple of lefty economists at UCLA a few years back, FDR extended the poverty and hopelessness of the Depression by seven years — and it wasn’t even the war that lifted us out. What really ended the Depression was FDR dying, thus bringing to an end his war on the private sector. Harry Truman’s ambitions were much more modest, and after the inevitable postwar recession, the economy returned to something approximating the pre-FDR normal.

Except, of course, for all those new taxes, programs, and regulations that are still with us.

But the point is: the Left has had the FDR narrative established for 80 years and it isn’t going away any time soon.

Joe Biden — or his master, Real President™ Ronald Klain — wanted to establish his own narrative as the next FDR.

FDR enjoyed massive majorities in both the House and Senate and (eventually) a compliant Supreme Court. Biden enjoys none of those things but nevertheless attempted FDR-size legislation even before wrangling all his own Democrats in the Senate.

“My name is Ozymandias, king of kings; Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!” Shelley wrote in his famous sonnet about the long-faded works of an ancient pharaoh. Biden had hoped to build himself a pyramid of new agencies in Washington. He’s barely erected a molehill.

That’s no way to establish a narrative.

Biden did get a narrative, set for him in another far-away land called Afghanistan. His bungled bugout established, for once, a Democratic narrative of truth: That Biden is equal parts inept, stubborn, and deceitful.

Firmly set, that narrative is now nearly impossible for Biden to remove or replace.

That’s doubly true since the only tools in his shed are the same shopworn and rusted ones that couldn’t get the job done the first time around.

So take heart, my lovely VIP readers.

As difficult and disappointing as these next three years are going to be for all of us, they’re going to be even more difficult and disappointing for the would-be FDRs still trying to prop up the Ozymandias who never was.

That’s cold comfort, but these days we have to take what we can get.

https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2022/02/04/biden-attempts-reset-3-in-two-weeks-fails-comically-n1556219

Wednesday, January 26, 2022

COPING WITH INFLATION, NEW YORK TIMES STYLE

COPING WITH INFLATION, NEW YORK TIMES STYLE

BY PAUL MIRENGOFF IN BIDEN ADMINISTRATIONINFLATIONMEDIA

Today’s Sunday’s New York Times focuses on inflation — not so much the thing itself, but rather its political implications. This frontpage story is about an alleged debate over whether Joe Biden’s covid stimulus is to blame for America’s inflation rate being higher than most other countries it’s fair to compare us with.

I’m not sure there is a genuine debate about this. However, to the Times’ credit, the article makes it pretty clear that economists generally identify overspending by Biden and the Democrats as a key factor in inflation.

The Times’ reporters state:

[A] chorus of economists point to government policies as a big part of the reason U.S. inflation is at a 40-year high. While they agree that prices are rising as a result of shutdowns and supply chain woes, they say that America’s decision to flood the economy with stimulus money helped to send consumer spending into overdrive, exacerbating those global trends.

At least as interesting as the Times’ news report is this editorial. The Times stopped producing regular formal editorials a while ago, according to my friend who reads to that paper. Yet, it saw the need to write one about inflation for today’s edition. We view the editorial as a response to, or at least an attempt to cope with, the frontpage story.

The editorial ruefully acknowledges that to some extent Biden’s stimulus played a role in inflation and that Biden hasn’t so far seemed concerned enough about the matter. However, the Times insists that the flood of stimulus money wasn’t a mistake, and it expresses continued support for Biden’s policies.

My friend points to the absence from both the news report and the editorial of the role Biden’s energy policy has played in the current inflation. But at least the Times has finally gotten around to informing its readers about the “chorus” of economists who make the strong (and obvious) connection between the administration’s stimulus and inflation.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/01/coping-with-inflation-new-york-times-style.php

Friday, December 24, 2021

Chuck Schumer's Tough-Guy Act Could Backfire Spectacularly in 2022 and Beyond

Chuck Schumer's Tough-Guy Act Could Backfire Spectacularly in 2022 and Beyond

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is furious with Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.). Over the weekend, Manchin told “Fox News Sunday” that he would not be supporting the Build Back Better (BBB) Act due to concerns about the actual costs of the programs in an inflationary environment. “What we need to do is get our financial house in order, but be able to pay for what we do and do what we pay for,” he said. Manchin also noted he was unable to justify a vote in favor of the “mammoth” piece of legislation to his constituents, despite being in favor of selected elements of it.

Schumer announced he would hold a floor vote on the legislation after the holiday to force senators to go on the record and to punish or shame Manchin. In a letter to his colleagues, Schumer wrote, “Senators should be aware that the Senate will, in fact, consider the Build Back Better Act very early in the new year so that every Member of this body has the opportunity to make their position known on the Senate floor, not just on television.” He added, “We are going to vote on a revised version of the House-passed Build Back Better Act — and we will keep voting on it until we get something done.”

Unfortunately for Schumer, polls show voters are not nearly as upset that the reconciliation bill is stalled as Democrats and their allies in the corporate media are. On Dec. 17, Rasmussen Reports noted that 77% of likely voters were following the news about the BBB Act at least somewhat closely. Only 38% support the legislation, while 45% are opposed. Among Democrats, support declined to 62%, and a mere 34% of independents want the spending bill passed.

As the debate drags on, fewer voters seem likely to support President Biden’s signature legislation. In combination with other factors, it also seems to be pulling down the president’s approval rating. According to Rasmussen, as of Dec. 20, 41% of likely voters approve of President Biden’s job performance while 57% disapprove. Of those, 47% strongly disapprove, giving Biden a Presidential Approval Index of -27.

Related: White House and the Left Get Nasty After Manchin Blows Up Biden Presidency

Additionally, polling shows that residents of West Virginia side with Manchin in opposing the legislation. According to a Rasmussen Reports/Numbers USA poll, only 49% of Democrat voters in West Virginia say they support BBB legislation. Solid majorities of both Republicans (72%) and independents (58%) oppose the legislation. Only 33% of Democrats support the provision that offers legal status and work permits for up to 8 million illegal immigrants. In a state where President Trump won nearly 70% of the vote in 2020, these results are not surprising. An on-the-record vote will not hurt Manchin with the people who vote for him.

However, it may hurt Schumer in the 2022 midterms. Three senators are up for re-election in states regarded as toss-ups. Senators Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), and Catherine Cortez-Masto (D-Nev.) will be required to go on the record supporting BBB. These senators won by less than 3%, and President Biden’s approval is negative by more than 20 points in all of their home states. Warnock, Kelly, and Cortez-Masto would consider joining Manchin in opposing the BBB legislation in a sane political moment.

Manchin has said other Democrats have privately indicated they support his position on the bill. Failing to do so publicly may cost Democrats the majority in the Senate as of November. In the past, Schumer has given Manchin and other vulnerable Democrats a pass to vote against their Democrat colleagues when it could hurt their electoral future. However, Schumer’s statement that he intends to pass some version of the House bill indicates that he expects the party to vote on some version of BBB in a bloc so Vice President Kamala Harris can break the tie.

Republicans should welcome Schumer’s insistence that senators go on the record regarding an unpopular bill ahead of the midterms. They should be giddy if Schumer insists on beating the horse that Manchin just killed. Schumer’s desperation to pander to the left wing of the party to solidify his political future may well cost Democrats the Senate majority.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/stacey-lennox/2021/12/20/chuck-schumers-tough-guy-act-could-backfire-spectacularly-in-2022-and-beyond-n1541480?utm_source=pjmedia&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&bcid=15803c7fc8c68b6fd1f0a5e7f4b59fc49df45d48335d4339ad60f7b0a0c7404d&recip=28668535

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

PETE BUTTIGIEG’S SLUSH FUND, PART TWO

PETE BUTTIGIEG’S SLUSH FUND, PART TWO

BY PAUL MIRENGOFF IN AFFHINFRASTRUCTUREPETE BUTTIGIEGRACIAL PREFERENCES

Earlier this month, I wrote about “Pete Buttigieg’s slush fund” — billions of dollars appropriated by the infrastructure bill that, as John Fund reported, allows the Secretary of Transportation to direct funds to combat climate change and “inequities caused by past transportation projects.” I argued that the goal of combatting past transportation inequities — of which, to be sure, there have been some — is a pretext for favoring Democratic constituencies, especially black voters, a group that showed no interest in voting for Buttigieg in 2020.

This Washington Post article doesn’t beat around the bush on the Buttigieg gambit. It acknowledges that Buttigieg’s “role overseeing hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure investments puts [him] at the center of the Biden administration’s chief accomplishment with implications for his boss’s future and his own.” The Post also acknowledges Buttigieg’s “struggle” to gain Black support and predicts that the slush fund (my term, not the Post’s) will be “especially helpful politically to Buttigieg” in overcoming that problem. (We’ll see.)

This New York Times article provides more information on the Buttigieg slush fund and unintentionally raises additional concerns about it. The article quantifies the slush fund. We learn that the infrastructure bill includes $660 billion in money for roads, bridges, and alike that will be distributed directly to states and disbursed at their discretion, but also includes $211 billion in discretionary grants that require approval by the Department of Transportation.

This apportionment is a compromise. Democrats want to focus on repairing old roads, rather than building new ones that would encourage the development of suburbs and exurbs. In fact, the Times tells us that Peter DeFazio, chairman of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, originally pushed to include language that would make it difficult for states to use the federal funds on highway expansion.

That effort failed. However, criteria like “climate change,” “environmental justice,” and “racial equity” provide Biden/Buttigieg with a means of preventing a goodly portion of the money to be used for new roads, in furtherance of DeFazio’s goal of blocking natural development.

The Times article indicates that the Republicans who voted for the infrastructure bill wanted all of the money to be sent directly to the states to be spent as they see fit, which, of course, would not preclude consideration of the interests of inner city residents and environmentalists. In the end, they compromised. They did, however, force Dems to agree that $93 billion of the slush fund (around 45 percent of it) will be subject to future congressional approval.

What we ended up with, though, is something like a transportation equivalent of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH). The feds use AFFH to influence, and maybe control, where people live, and to undermine the autonomy of suburbs.

Pete Buttigieg can now dispense $93 billion in infrastructure money, and maybe as much as $211 billion, to influence development patterns in ways that disfavor the suburbs and exurbs. There can be no doubt that this is exactly what Buttigieg intends to do.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/11/pete-buttigiegs-slush-fund-part-two.php

Wednesday, November 10, 2021

Vaccine Mandate Is Cloward-Piven Plan To Destroy USA and End Capitalism

Vaccine Mandate Is Cloward-Piven Plan To Destroy USA and End Capitalism

Wayne Allyn Root

Back in the 1980s, I was a Columbia University student learning about a plan to destroy America and end capitalism. It was called Cloward-Piven -- named after a Columbia University husband-and-wife professor team. Their insane goal was to turn America into a socialist, communist hellhole.

They planned to do it by overwhelming and collapsing the U.S. economy with massive debt, created by getting as many Americans as possible to depend on welfare, food stamps and unemployment benefits. In the ensuing economic catastrophe and collapse of our country, every business owner would get on their knees to beg government to save them.

At that moment of crisis and chaos, we would become a socialist, communist country.

Don't look now, but it's happening. The communists of Columbia (and every other elitist Ivy League school) have tried for decades to force a majority of Americans to rely on welfare benefits. They failed. But they won't give up. They've modified the plan. It's now a powerful one-two punch.

First, they've opened the borders to let millions of migrants and refugees into this country -- almost all of whom want cradle-to-grave welfare. Also, don't forget they all need free health care for themselves and their kids, and their new babies, and their extended families. That alone could overwhelm the system and collapse the economy. That's before welfare and food stamps. And then there's free public school for all their children and expensive English-as-a-second-language programs that cost billions of dollars but make teachers unions filthy rich.

Open borders is Cloward-Piven strategy updated for 2021. And as the greatest bonus ever, Democrats know these millions of foreigners will loyally vote for the party who lets them in and then promises to give them the biggest welfare checks. These are lifetime Democrat voters.

But there is now a powerful Part Deux to Cloward-Piven. Democrats aren't content to just welcome tens of millions of foreign welfare addicts into the USA. They want to make tens of millions of American-born citizens unemployed and dependent on government too.

So, Part Deux of Cloward-Piven is the vaccine mandates.

These COVID-19 vaccine mandates are destroying the country, creating chaos, crisis and division. They are wiping out the ranks of the police, fire, paramedics, nurses, prison guards, border patrol and military. Our middle class is being ripped to shreds. These frontline heroes and defenders don't want this dangerous, experimental, for-emergency-use-only jab. There will soon be no one to answer your 911 call. The police will be defunded -- without voters ever getting a vote.

The military will be left weak and crippled. Wanna bet China is directing this plan? We all know China owns Biden and his family. Biden is serving up the country on a platter to China.

The vaccine mandates also make the supply chain problems much worse. Truck drivers don't want the jab. They're quitting in droves. Jet pilots don't want the jab. They're on strike now -- ask Southwest and American Airlines why thousands of flights were grounded recently. If these pilots are fired, the tourism industry will be devastated. Shipping cargo by air will be devastated. Without pilots and truckers, food and supplies won't make it to stores. Shelves will be empty -- just like the old communist Soviet Union. Coincidence?

Like I said, this is a communist takeover of the USA. Empty shelves are the hallmark of communism.

And then there's the economy. If vaccine passports are mandated, restaurants, bars, nightclubs and retail stores will be crushed. Doubt me? Scotland's Hotel Association just announced a 40% drop in business from the vaccine passport. New York City's restaurants have announced the same size drop in business.

Without the spending of tens of millions of my fellow Americans who choose to be unvaccinated, businesses will close by the millions. The economy will collapse.

This is Cloward-Piven. It's real. It's happening. Democrats are purposely destroying and collapsing the economy. They're defunding the American middle class.

It's time to fight back HARD. It's time to stop turning the other cheek. My new bestselling book, "The Great Patriot Protest and Boycott Book," lays out the only possible strategy for conservative patriots -- CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE, the strategy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. We have to hit these socialist, communist traitors and madmen squarely where it hurts -- in the pocketbook -- with national protests, strikes, boycotts and acts of civil disobedience. We must bankrupt them and bring them to their knees begging for forgiveness. Two can play at this game.

The choice is clear: We either resist, or we lose America, our jobs, our careers, our middle-class quality of life, our health and everything that made America great. It's time to fight like animals, fight like it's the end of America, fight like our lives and the lives of our children are at stake ...

Because they are.

https://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2021/11/07/vaccine-mandate-is-clowardpiven-plan-to-destroy-usa-and-end-capitalism-n2598672

Friday, October 1, 2021

The Labor Shortage Isn’t Just Closing Small Businesses, But Shattering Entire Retirement Plans

The Labor Shortage Isn’t Just Closing Small Businesses, But Shattering Entire Retirement Plans

It's time to sell the business and retire — but that's easier said 
than done.
Kylee Zempel
By 

Gary and Judi Eubanks are one of a kind. Both in their 60s, Judi is a skilled pianist and Gary can often be found playing pick-up basketball with the young people he used to coach. They have two sons and a handful of grandkids, and they’re heavily involved in their local church, where Judi is one of the piano players and Gary is almost always either leading worship or fixing the heating or air conditioning.

That’s because the duo also owns All Temperature Systems, a heating, cooling, and refrigeration business situated about halfway between the Chain O’Lakes and Parfreyville in the 6,000-resident town of Waupaca, Wisconsin. Though this couple is unique, a big part of their story is all too commonplace: They’re victims of the debilitating worker shortage.

worker shortage Eubanks - Gary

Courtesy of All Temperature Systems

The Eubankses have been running the business since 1985, but back then it was called Omits Refrigeration Service. Just after their first son Joe was born, Gary and Judi were living in Houston and realized they didn’t want to raise kids in a city. So they moved up to Waupaca, the small town where Judi was born and raised, and took over Omits Refrigeration on April 1 that year so that its owner could retire. They acquired another heating and cooling business 15 years later in 2000 and became All Temperature Systems.

Though Gary was the only worker during those early years, the company now has eight employees aside from Gary and Judi, who are now about ready to sell the business and retire. But that’s easier said than done.

Federal COVID ‘Solutions’ Worsened the Worker Shortage

They know another person in the industry who had been trying to purchase a different business similar to theirs, but that endeavor was complicated by the fact that the business he wanted to buy had taken Paycheck Protection Program funds during the pandemic to keep its workers on payroll — something Gary and Judi also had to do.

“Last year when the pandemic hit, it just died as far as business. Restaurants were shutting, I mean, you know, government was shutting businesses down. We were an essential business because we keep people’s heat going during winter, so we had to keep going. But as it slowed down, we would have normally started laying guys off. Now, that’s a double-edged sword because if you lay guys off, well, somebody else is looking for a skilled worker, so they go find another job,” Gary said, his voice still dripping with Texas despite having left the Lone Star State more than three decades ago. “That was the reason for the PPP, so that you could still give your guys a 40-hour paycheck, and you don’t have to lay them off.”

The Eubankses said this other man in the industry hasn’t been able to buy a heating and cooling company despite his efforts since it’s been almost impossible to get a loan. That’s because banks look at some of the businesses that accepted PPP funds and are skeptical that they would have survived without the government — the same one that jeopardized their businesses in the first place with lockdowns — then bailing them out. Would they have been solvent if they hadn’t taken taxpayer funds? Banks speculate on this question and then might deny a loan.

Because Gary and Judi accepted PPP funds to retain their own workers when the government shuttered the types of businesses they would typically be servicing, they’re afraid a potential buyer won’t be able to get the funds to purchase All Temperature Systems, and that after more than 36 years of pouring into the business, they could be hung out to dry as they try to retire.

Courtesy of All Temperature Systems

“You know, the PPP, we wouldn’t be in business last year without it, or we would have had to get a loan. So it benefited us,” Judi said, telling The Federalist that during the April, May, and June 2020 quarter when government lockdowns were in full swing, their revenue dropped by 28 percent. “But could it possibly come to hurt us at our age trying to retire?”

Recruitment Is Hard, Retention Is Impossible

It isn’t just about PPP funds though. For years, Gary and Judi have been on the hunt for a hard worker they could train to take over the business when they retire, which has been difficult amid the huge push for higher education and massive student loan forgiveness. They’re prepared to teach somebody the trade.

About four years ago, they found somebody from a different part of the state who had graduated from a tech school and just needed a little field training. They paid to move this man and his family to Waupaca, helped them get set up in a house, and employed and trained him for a year and three months — before he moved away.

“And so we train them, and then they’re gone,” Gary said.

The Eubankses then decided it would be better to invest in somebody from Waupaca who wanted to stay there. They called up all the high schools in the surrounding areas — “Wild Rose, Iola, Waupaca, Weyauwega,” Gary listed them off — asking the teachers from the industrial arts departments to contact them if they had any students who were mechanically inclined and wanted to learn a trade instead of going to college.

“We got zero calls from four schools,” Gary said.

Nobody Wants to Work

Courtesy of All Temperature Systems

Aside from not being able to find someone to take over the business, Gary and Judi can’t even find people willing to work, period. Two years ago, they put a sign out in front of their business, which sits along a busy state road, advertising “Now Hiring. We Will Train” for three and a half months.

“Two guys stopped in to get applications. Neither one of them brought them back,” Gary said. “We’re willing to train you into a skill, I mean, into a trade here … And my wonder was, how many guys in their 20s went by delivering pizzas that summer, saw that banner, and never even came in?”

“People don’t want the responsibility,” Judi added. “They don’t want the headaches. Basically, most people don’t want to work today.”

The Eubankses have witnessed this problem for years, but now it’s far worse, with the coronavirus and subsequent government response exacerbating the worker shortage. Not only has the PPP come back to bite business owners like Gary and Judi, but increased unemployment handouts, taxpayer-funded stimulus checks, and the boom of remote jobs have wildly disincentivized would-be workers. And thanks to an ever-rising minimum wage, these trade businesses are now competing for workers with low-skill, low-responsibility jobs as well.

“I’m in restaurants working all the time,” said Gary, who often services commercial refrigerators. “I’ll be talking with young guys that are in there, chopping up onions in the kitchen, whatever. And I’ll ask them, ‘Have you thought about something else different? Trades?’ ‘Oh, no, I like my schedule here. I get to work kind of when I want to.’ And they’re not interested in a full-time job.”

“And now what the situation we’re finding is that people don’t want to start at the low end of the totem pole when they can go to Dairy Queen and make $19 an hour,” Judi chimed in.

Since it’s a skilled labor job, All Temperature Systems has to invest thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars to train a worker who doesn’t know the trade, but that same person can go to the local fast-food restaurant, make about as much as heating and cooling employees — if not more because Dairy Queen doesn’t provide benefits to those workers — and work the 20-30 hours a week that they want to.

“We’re a service industry. So it’s not like it’s 8 to 5 — there’s a lot of days, you get to go home early even. But when it’s cold, or when it’s really hot, you may be working till 7 or 8 at night, or even longer. Nobody wants to work that way anymore,” Gary said, blaming in part the COVID-era shift to remote work. “The pandemic has really changed the dynamics of trying to recruit people.”

You Can’t Compete with the Government

Beyond competing with minimum-wage jobs, Gary and Judi have also competed with government jobs and their cushy, taxpayer-funded benefits.

Several years ago, one employee who’d been with them for 16 years left to go work for lower wages at the county jail, where All Temperature Systems had long serviced the refrigeration equipment. So not only did the business lose an employee; it also lost an account because now the jail had in-house talent to work on its refrigerators. Another one of their employees left to work at the Wisconsin Veteran’s Home, a branch of Veteran’s Affairs.

“You’re not only trying to compete against other people with wages and stuff, but nobody, no private corporation out there, can compete with government benefits. I’m talking county, state, federal — it doesn’t matter. We can’t touch it,” Gary said. “That’s my tax dollars at work there.”

“I provide better insurance that I can’t even get for my employees, but they can go to the government and I still pay for it,” Judi said.

A Journey of Faith

It’s been a rough road at times for this couple, and though they’re humans who worry like the rest, they’ll tell you their journey is an exercise in faith and that they trust God with the outcome. As Gary says, “It’s all faith-based. God put us here. So we figured when God’s ready for us to be out, we’ll be out.”

“I think that hearing some of these other stories about people’s situations puts us in kind of a precarious position where we want to trust God, but we don’t know what obstacles we’re going to have to overcome,” Judi said.

“I tell you, there’s been plenty of times where it looked pretty, pretty, pretty bad. And I look back at my books, and I look back at our path … I look back at some of those years, and I don’t know how we did it,” she added. “The only way we put it is that it’s in God’s hands.”

https://thefederalist.com/2021/09/23/the-labor-shortage-isnt-just-closing-small-businesses-but-shattering-entire-retirement-plans/