Showing posts with label military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military. Show all posts

Sunday, September 25, 2022

Military’s Recruitment Shortfall a Direct Result of Vaccine Mandate: GOP Lawmakers

A member of the U.S. Air Force receives the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine at Kunsan Air Base, Republic of Korea, on Dec. 29, 2020. (U.S. Air Force/Jordan Garner)

Military’s Recruitment Shortfall a Direct Result of Vaccine Mandate: GOP Lawmakers

By J.M. Phelps
 
0:005:46

Forty-seven Republican lawmakers recently expressed “grave concerns” about military readiness as a result of the Pentagon’s mandate in a letter (pdf) dated Sept. 15. The Epoch Times spoke to four of the lawmakers who signed the letter, which called on Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and the Department of Defense to withdraw its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for service members.

“As a result of [the vaccine] mandate, eight percent of the Army’s approximately 1 million soldiers face expulsion” the letter stated.

The Army has only met 52 percent of its fiscal year 2022 recruiting goal, the letter added.

“While we are primarily addressing the Army’s recruitment problem,” Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.) said, “this issue is a problem across the board for all our uniformed services.” With no lack of respect for the other branches of service, he said, “the Army is the cornerstone of our military presence in the world.”

Higgins and other GOP lawmakers agreed that the Army’s failure to reach its recruiting goal is directly related to the military’s vaccine mandate that was put into effect by Austin in August 2021.

“This is clearly the case because 40 percent of men aged 18 to 24 have not taken the vaccine,” Higgins explained.

Rep. Pete Stauber (R-Minn.) emphasized that “the mandate clearly disincentivizes 40 percent of recruits.”

Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.) noted that “In the southeast, which is the area which has the most enlisted persons, that number is over 50 percent.”

“What that means is that the Department of Defense has disqualified nearly half of their recruitment pool right off the top,” he added.

Epoch Times Photo
Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.) speaks during a House Committee on Oversight and Reform hearing on gun violence on Capitol Hill in Washington on June 8, 2022. (Andrew Harnik/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

In the history of the Army, Higgins said, “the country has never fallen so short on its recruiting goals.”

With growing threats from countries like China, Iran, Russia, and North Korea, Johnson said, “we are in a very dangerous time in terms of our national defense, and we can’t afford to have shortfalls like this.”

And according to Higgins, “the readiness and deployability of our Army is the most significant factor in the discussion about the effectiveness of our Army around the world.”

Stauber agreed with the others, saying that the Pentagon’s mandate is “tyrannical” and “absolutely harms” military readiness and national security. “With the violent, uncertain, and complex world that we live in, we as a nation have to be in a position to project military strength around the world—and losing thousands of soldiers isn’t going to help that,” he said.

House Judiciary Committee Holds Hearing On The Threat To Individual Freedoms In Post-Roe World
Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks during a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, on July 14, 2022. (Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

Necessity Questioned

“For the Department of Defense to continue the vaccine mandate is very suspect,” Johnson said. “We have a responsibility in Congress to provide oversight and to ask important questions and that’s what we did with this letter—and we’re going to get answers one way or the other.”

Johnson recognizes that “there’s a tendency with any federal agency or department to drag their feet” on responding to a Congressional inquiry, but he said he is anticipating that Republicans will be the new majority in the House after the midterms in November.

“Come January, I can’t think of a matter of oversight that is more important than our nation’s defense,” Johnson said. “We will be pressing, and we will be very aggressive.”

Epoch Times Photo
Rep. Pete Stauber (R-Minn.) in an interview on NTD’s Capitol Report on April 28, 2022. (NTD/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)

Stauber said that constituents have been pressing his office to help fight the military’s vaccine mandate.

“The facts about the unlawfulness and ineffectiveness of the vaccine are indisputable, and informed service members and their families are calling my office, asking that Congress do something to stop [Austin’s] tyrannical mandate,” he said.

Rep. Diana Harshbarger (R-Tenn.) said, “these families are crying out for the people who have devoted their lives to the military and defending the country.” And as a result, she said, “I had to be part of letting Lloyd Austin know this is unacceptable.”

Johnson and others called into question the necessity of the mandate given questions surrounding the vaccine’s effectiveness.

“As mentioned in the letter, the efficacy of the vaccine is in real question now,” Johnson said.

“Service members under the age of 40 have almost no risk and there’s nearly zero chance of death from the virus,” Johnson said, adding that “it’s irrefutable that natural immunity is better protection against virus when data is showing that COVID vaccinations aren’t effective against the most recent strain anyway.”

Higgins said, “the Department of Defense refuses to recognize natural immunity, but instead, they keep pushing a vaccine that’s incredibly dangers with virtually no benefit.”

Epoch Times Photo
Rep. Diana Harshbarger. (Official photo)

According to Harshbarger, “when Biden said the pandemic was over [in a “60 Minutes” interview on Sept. 18], it demands the immediate reversal and withdrawal of the mandate.”

But instead of ending the mandate, she said, “they’re willing to lower recruiting standards, which is only going to make things worse and create a bigger problem in the end.”

To that end, Higgins said, “even if you had a one million strong standing army, it does you no good if you can’t deploy them to fight or they are not capable of fighting.”

“It’s also incumbent upon our Army and our military leaders to protect our soldiers so they can maintain and grow their health in a fashion that keeps them deployable,” Higgins said.

Harshbarger said, “the bottom line is this: our service members didn’t volunteer to fight for our freedom just to have their own freedoms taken away,” adding that “they must be kept strong so they can be strong for all of us.”

The Epoch Times has reached out to the Department of Defense for comment.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/militarys-recruitment-shortfall-a-direct-result-of-vaccine-mandate-gop-lawmakers_4746896.html?utm_source=News&src_cat=News&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-09-22-3&src_cmp=breaking-2022-09-22-3&utm_medium=email&est=62RasyeNdaZhmiAD6OMNtovbVEEz03VRBaQWrcbZ5XMDrx7vLFJEs40HSAuA

Friday, August 19, 2022

Why the Afghanistan Withdrawal Was the Perfect Storm of Bureaucratic Incompetence

Why the Afghanistan Withdrawal Was the Perfect Storm of Bureaucratic Incompetence

Amber Smith

It’s been nearly one year since the world witnessed the worst foreign policy disaster to occur in generations. One year since thousands of Afghans rushed a C-17, resulting in bodies falling from the sky. One year since a suicide bomber made his way through a Taliban-controlled checkpoint to the Kabul airport gates, killing 13 U.S. service members who were helping Americans and Afghan nationals trying to flee Afghanistan. One year since 10 Afghan civilians (seven of which were children) were targeted and killed in a U.S. drone strike after the Pentagon tracked and wrongly identified a vehicle they suspected was an ISIS-K threat. One year since hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans were left behind to fall victim to Taliban brutality. 

President Biden wants you to forget about what happened in Afghanistan. He wants you to forget about the bureaucratic incompetence and incompetent decision-making by nearly every senior leader. To this day, no one has been held accountable. Accountability, even verbally, would mean admitting failure and taking ownership, something the Biden administration refuses to accept.

The botched withdrawal wasn’t a mistake or a one-time bad call. The catastrophe occurred due to consistent and specific inept leadership failures at the Department of Defense, Department of State, the White House, and the Intelligence Community. Failure to plan. Failure to be realistic about the strength and capabilities of the Taliban. Failure to adequately prepare and vet people to get them out of the country before the U.S. military departed. The Biden administration failed to connect the dots and keep agencies in sync. Pentagon leadership downplayed the truth about the shell the Afghanistan government and military was, as well as the reality that without the U.S. dollar and military propping them up, they would all come crashing down. Washington was hoping for an Afghanistan that they wanted - that should have been after 20 years of war and $2 trillion - but wasn’t. The withdrawal wasn’t a mistake - it was a catastrophic failure of epic proportions. 

But aside from the long-term strategic failures, the single operational decision that put the nail in the coffin was the Pentagon’s decision to pull out all remaining troops from Bagram airbase in early July (aside from those 650 service members protecting the embassy). Nearly 3,500 troops left overnight with little notice to their Afghan counterparts. The decision to close Bagram set off a domino effect for the chaotic evacuation. It was a strategic airbase. It was a former Soviet airbase with multiple runways that had 20 years of upgrades since the U.S. military’s arrival in 2001. Tactically, it was much easier to defend than Kabul. Logistics and security were in place. The geographic terrain surrounding the base made for a capable defense. Once Bagram was closed, the U.S. military was left with only one, horrible evacuation option: Kabul.

Kabul International Airport was the only airport left to get people out of the country. It is surrounded by the city of Kabul, is plagued with many choke points, and has only one, very vulnerable runway. The State Department’s plan was to keep the U.S. embassy open with 1,400 Americans, secured by 650 Marines, setting the stage for a monumental and deadly hostage situation.

Apparently no one at DoD, State, IC, or the White House considered the possibility that the Taliban might take control of the perimeter of the airport. Nor the fact that if the U.S. no longer controlled access in and out of the airport they’d likely have to send in thousands of troops from the 82nd Airborne. Contingency planning has always been a significant part of mission planning in combat regardless of mission priority, but in this case, it clearly wasn’t given the time or attention it deserved. The U.S. was without a plan with no time to react. Mayhem ensued. People were stranded. People were beaten. People were killed. Scenes were eerily similar to the fall of Saigon as U.S. military helicopters rescued American diplomats off of the roof of the U.S. embassy and left many angry about how history could so perfectly repeat itself. 

The failures of the withdrawal of Afghanistan show significant flaws in our national defense decision-making. When the disconnect gets so great between decision-makers in Washington and those commanders on the ground in war zones, it creates impossible situations with impossible expectations. Things that brief well in Washington in SCIFs two stories underground don’t always equate to real-world situations on the battlefield or for those tactical commanders who are left trying to accomplish the impossible.

CENTCOM commander General McKenzie testified in front of Congress that the “Bagram option went away” once President Biden ordered all military troops to depart Afghanistan. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Milley, contradicted him by stating that using Kabul to evacuate civilians was the plan all along - not Bagram. Political appeasement and bureaucracy killed any chance at winning the 20-year war and in that same vein led to the failed withdrawal that got 13 Americans killed. There has been no responsibility, no accountability. 

We will not forget. And the families of the 13 U.S. service members killed during withdrawal operations as well as the thousands of families of those that were killed during Operation Enduring Freedom will not forgive.

Amber Smith is the bestselling author of Danger Close. She is a former Pentagon official and U.S. Army Kiowa Warrior helicopter pilot and combat veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan. Visit OfficialAmberSmith.com for more and follow her on Instagram and Twitter @AmberSmithUSA.

https://townhall.com/columnists/ambersmith/2022/08/15/why-the-afghanistan-withdrawal-was-the-perfect-storm-of-bureaucratic-incompetence-n2611606

Wednesday, July 27, 2022

Report: The Senate Armed Services Committee Calls For Pentagon To Cease Rooting Out “Extremism” In The Military

Report: The Senate Armed Services Committee Calls For Pentagon To Cease Rooting Out “Extremism” In The Military

“While not legally binding on the Pentagon, it appears to send a signal of congressional opposition to efforts to counter extremist narratives in the military.”

The military is having recruitment and retention issues unlike any in decades, almost all are self-inflicted, and the radical Joe “I am the Democratic Party” Biden administration seems determined to fulfill Obama’s goal of reducing our military to pre-World War II levels.

At LI, we’ve covered much of the Biden military’s woke war on wrongthink; here are just a few:

Amid the chaos and destruction created by turning our military into a regimented version of WokeU, Republicans on the Senate Armed Services Committee have had enough and are directly addressing a core problem that is severely damaging our nation’s military.

Roll Call reports (archive link):

The Senate Armed Services Committee has called on the Defense Department to halt its programs to prevent and root out extremism in the ranks.

The report accompanying the Senate’s National Defense Authorization Act, which was made public late Monday, states the committee’s view that “spending additional time and resources to combat exceptionally rare instances of extremism in the military is an inappropriate use of taxpayer funds, and should be discontinued by the Department of Defense immediately.”

The language has not previously been reported in the press. While not legally binding on the Pentagon, it appears to send a signal of congressional opposition to efforts to counter extremist narratives in the military . . . .

The Committee’s approval hinged on the vote of Independent Maine Sen. Angus King.

Roll Call continues:

While the Senate report language suggests the committee as a whole supports halting counter-extremism training and analysis, the same document reveals that the committee approved including that section of the report by only the narrowest of margins: 14-12.

Every Republican on the committee voted for the motion, and every Democrat voted against it. Maine Independent Sen. Angus King’s vote in favor of the language tipped the balance in the GOP’s favor.

This is where I would normally urge you to read the rest, but don’t bother. I’ll sum it up for you: military bad, military a cesspit of extremism, and even if it’s not, even one trained active duty military member or veteran poses an existential threat to the entire U.S. government.

It’s long been the radical left’s strategy to tear down and destroy American institutions and to build up and replace them with their own hyper-partisan and -ideological versions of the same thing. How long before we start hearing about Obama’s “civilian national security force” that is “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded” as the U.S. military? Only, you know, woke and answering only the radical left and its two-tier “justice” system.

Thursday, May 26, 2022

‘America First’ is America at its best

‘America First’ is America at its best

It's disingenuous to link the movement with pre-World War II isolationists

As former Trump Administration national security officials who deeply believe in an America First approach to U.S. national security policy, we strongly object to the May 14 Washington Post editorial, “‘America First’ is America at its worst,” which smeared the “America First” movement by associating it with isolationists of the 1930s and ’40s who tried to keep the United States out of World War II and claims those who support America First oppose providing Ukraine with more military aid.

These claims are false and misleading. We asked The Washington Post to run this rebuttal of their editorial, but they refused to publish this full response. Typical for the Post, it refuses to give the conservatives it attacks a fair opportunity to respond.

While there may be others in Washington who casually call themselves “America First,” we at the America First Policy Institute served alongside former President Donald Trump in senior positions at the White House and in departments and agencies throughout the Executive Branch. We are among the leaders of the America First Movement. We have been abundantly clear in condemning Russian President Vladimir Putin’s destructive invasion of Ukraine and the vile atrocities his military is committing there. We have repeatedly stated the urgency that the United States provide Ukraine with all the weaponry it needs to defend itself against Russia’s unjustifiable invasion. 

It was disingenuous for the Post to associate the America First movement with isolationism or pre-World War II isolationists who opposed the United States entering World War II. Today’s America First calls for an independent and secure America with a strong military and alliances. We want to ensure America’s supply chains and economy are stable and robust, and its people are safe. Through internal strength, our nation is best poised to lead and engage in the world and accomplish more for the American people and the peace, prosperity and freedom of others. America First is not isolationism. Rather, it is purposeful transactional engagement with other nations to serve American interests first.

As a result, although we support providing additional military support to Ukraine, including the recent approval by the House of $40 billion for this purpose, we share the concerns of some members of Congress that these funds be well spent, and alliance members contribute equitably. Frankly, we have strong concerns that, once again, America is doing more than its European allies. Sen. Rand Paul has a proposal to name an inspector general to oversee this funding. The special inspector general for Afghanistan was created for this purpose during the U.S. presence in Afghanistan. Given the current problems plaguing the U.S. economy and the fact that Ukraine is now the number one recipient of U.S. military aid, we believe it is essential to ensure accountability for the large sums America is committing to help Ukraine defend itself against the Russian invasion.

America First foreign policy and strong U.S. leadership make the world safer and represent America at its best. Contrary to many liberals, conservative hawks and deep state leakers, the leadership of Mr. Trump did not make the world less safe; it did exactly what it was designed to do — make America strong again and the world a safer place with a purposeful, transactional foreign policy that put the interests of our nation and the American people first.

As history shows us, the only time this century Russia didn’t invade a neighbor was during the four years when Mr. Trump served as commander in chief. America First does not mean America alone. As the only true guardians of America First foreign policy, we unquestionably oppose the Russian invasion of Ukraine; we want the United States to send the Ukrainian military the weapons it needs and ensure accountability for the military aid we are providing to Ukraine.

• Lt. Gen. (Ret.) Keith Kellogg was an assistant to the president and national security adviser to former President Donald Trump and former Vice President Mike Pence. He is currently co-chair of the Center for American Security at the America First Policy Institute. Fred Fleitz was chief of staff of the National Security Council in the Trump administration and a former CIA analyst. He is vice chair of the Center for American Security at the America First Policy Institute.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/may/19/america-first-is-america-at-its-best/

Saturday, April 2, 2022

Gosh, There Sure Is a Lot of Hunter Biden News These Days

Gosh, There Sure Is a Lot of Hunter Biden News These Days

AP Photo/Charles Dharapak

Top O’ the Briefing

Happy Monday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Egg salad is off the menu until Ralph gets his act together.

These last couple of years have certainly had that bad dream quality, haven’t they? The first couple of months of 2020 were spectacular and there was a lot I was looking forward to throughout the year. Heck, I was even looking forward to the presidential election.

That kinda went sour.

Mainstream and social media malpractice since March of 2020 has been one of the greatest threats this once-great Republic has faced. We are now saddled with a president who rarely knows where he is and may actually gaffe us into World War III, all because coastal liberals had their delicate feelings hurt by Donald Trump.

Trump, for those not paying attention, did not get us into WWIII.

Despite what Democrats and their flying monkeys in the media keep saying, there were myriad “irregularities” throughout the 2020 presidential election. One of the biggest shady dealings was the social and mainstream media-wide collusion to suppress the story of Hunter “Sleaze Prince” Biden’s laptop. Several polls since the election have revealed that some truthful reporting on the story would have gotten people to change their votes.

Now that they’ve got Ol’ Drools safely installed in the Oval Office, the MSM hacks feel comfortable admitting that the laptop exists and that it might be problematic.

We had a couple of stories over the weekend about the laptop that raised a few eyebrows. The first is from Kevin:

Vyacheslav Volodin, Russia’s State Duma speaker, claims the emails are solid proof that Hunter and Gropey Joe Biden are involved in Ukraine’s bioweapons research.

According to the New York Post, “US intelligence officials had earlier dismissed Russia’s messaging as war propaganda, explaining that Ukraine’s network of biological labs dedicated to pathogen research were not secret, and had publicly received funding from Washington.”

Although the statement was posted on Tass, Russia’s state-run propaganda outlet, the New York Post, said Volodin’s claim is “accurate” based on emails from Hunter’s laptop reviewed by both The Post and the UK Daily Mail.

Volodin further declared, “US President Joe Biden himself is involved in the creation of bio laboratories in Ukraine. An investment fund run by his sun [sic] Hunter Biden funded research and the implementation of the United States’ military biological program. It is obvious that Joe Biden, as his father and the head of state, was aware of that activity.”

That seems like something worth reporting, doesn’t it?

Robert wrote the other story:

Old Joe Biden’s chip off the old block, Hunter Biden, has been many things: board member of the Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma; vice chairman of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation; sought-after artist; and international bon vivant, but he has never been known to have served in the Department of Defense. So why does his infamous laptop contain, on top of everything else that is incriminating on it, Defense Department encryption keys that are not available to private citizens?

Sam Faddis, a retired CIA Operations Officer who served in the Near East and South Asia, disclosed on Sunday that “the ongoing analysis of the hard drive of Hunter Biden’s laptop” revealed the Defense Department encryption keys, and this was not an insignificant find: “These keys allow access to DOD email accounts and databases.” As is characteristic of Hunter Biden from what we know of him already, he didn’t just dabble; he went all in. “The exact number of these keys is still unknown. There may be dozens.”

Enterprising dude, that Hunter. When he isn’t busy with hookers and questionable investment practices, his cocaine-covered fingers are possibly glomming onto things that could jeopardize national security.

And his daddy is our commander-in-chief!

If history is ever written honestly again, the shameful behavior of the MSM since 2016 will be roundly condemned. Sadly, academics are leftist lunatics as well, so we probably shouldn’t hold our collective breath waiting for that truthful recap.

The members of the MSM haven’t been honest about almost anything since Trump was elected in 2016. Their abuse of their First Amendment protections has been borderline criminal. Everyone involved in the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up in 2020 isn’t set up well in the karma department.

Anytime one of Trump’s adult kids (who all actually work for a living) so much has hiccupped the MSM  reported on it for days. Hunter Biden gets a free pass because they’re all breaking their backs carrying water for his old man.

I think I’m going to go live at a brewery until 2024.

Everything Isn’t Awful

https://pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2022/03/28/the-morning-briefing-gosh-there-sure-is-a-lot-of-hunter-biden-news-these-days-n1584762

Tuesday, March 8, 2022

Heckling and Exploiting the State of the Union

Heckling and Exploiting the State of the Union

By Tim Graham



White House press secretary Jen Psaki appeared live on the MSNBC show "Way Too Early" at 5:45 a.m. the morning after the State of the Union speech. Overall, the questions were cooked, over easy.

Host Jonathan Lemire underlined the speech was President Joe Biden's biggest audience of the year, but he "made not one mention last night of the January 6 insurrection. Why is that?"

Psaki replied that yes, the speech is "hugely important," but "it doesn't have the time to touch on everything that is a priority." That's a weird answer, since Biden spoke for 62 minutes.

Then Lemire asked about the ruckus over "a pair of Republican House members who chose to heckle President Biden as he was speaking about his late son, Beau. Do you have any response to what they said?"

Psaki demurred. "During that heckling, I was watching on TV with a group of my team members and colleagues, and we were all excited and cheering."

Too many journalists employed this inaccurate verbiage on the order of speaking and heckling. Biden was speaking about soldiers getting cancer from serving in areas with toxic burn pits. He said, "When they came home, many of the world's fittest and best trained warriors were never the same. Headaches. Numbness. Dizziness. A cancer that would put them in a flag-draped coffin. I know."

Rep. Lauren Boebert yelled, "13 of them," referring to the U.S. service members lost in a terrorist bombing in Kabul during the withdrawal from Afghanistan. The Democrats booed energetically. So, Biden was heckled before Beau was mentioned.

Then Biden added, "One of those soldiers was my son, Major Beau Biden," and then he said, "We don't know for sure if a burn pit was the cause of his brain cancer." No one asks whether Beau was anywhere near burn pits in Iraq. No fact-checkers stir.

Heckling a president during the State of the Union (especially a Democrat president) is not polite or politically smart. But the liberal journalists who were scandalized by the heckling never take exception to Biden's very repetitive citations of his son, so much it reeks of exploitation.

The president implied his son was a soldier among "the world's fittest and best-trained warriors." Beau Biden served honorably in Iraq in 2008 and 2009 (coinciding with Biden's campaign for vice president). But he served as a lawyer, as a major in the Judge Advocate General's Corps.

More than a few conservatives drew a different inference. Biden made no explicit mention of Afghanistan or the American lives lost there, and so when Psaki said Biden "didn't have time to touch on everything," it sounded like there was no time in a 62-minute speech to mention those warriors. But there was time to work in Beau.

When the families of those 13 war dead assembled at Dover Air Force Base in August, several were disturbed by the president's energetic citation of Beau. "When he just kept talking about his son so much it was just — my interest was lost in that," said Mark Schmitz. Biden also angered the families as he was also caught repeatedly looking at his watch as the bodies were unloaded one by one.

On the morning after the big speech, someone posted an edited video on Twitter that underscored how aggressively Biden has brought up his son's death, with a slick set of choking-up-and-talking points. MSNBC and everyone else in the liberal media routinely enable this exercise ... at the same time that they routinely ignore every scandalous new development about Hunter Biden, the son who can't be painted as G.I. Joe.

https://www.creators.com/read/tim-graham/03/22/heckling-and-exploiting-the-state-of-the-union