Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 24, 2022

Why It’s So Hard to Pity Muslims

Why It’s So Hard to Pity Muslims

AP Photo, File

How does one pity a group that itself regularly exhibits no pity or even mere tolerance for others? This is the conundrum one faces when considering Muslim victim groups.

Take the Rohingya, for instance, a Muslim people that primarily lived in Myanmar, while, like most invading and conquering Muslims, not being indigenous to Myanmar. There they have been severely persecuted by the indigenous Buddhists of that nation. While the Rohingya are regularly presented as victims—aspects of which is no doubt true—historically and precipitating their current status, whenever they had the chance, they were the ones quick to victimize others.

In fact, and not unlike the Muslim minorities of other nations, the Rohingya have been committing the same sort of anti-infidel mayhem, violence, terrorism, and rape that one is accustomed to associating with “radical Islam”—though news of it seldom reaches the West. The main difference is that, unlike, say, the West, Myanmar has responded with uncompromising ruthlessness.

Consider the words of Wirathu, the leading anti-Muslim Buddhist monk in Burma: “If we are weak, our land will become Muslim.” The theme song of his party speaks of a people who “live in our land, drink our water, and are ungrateful to us”—a reference to the Rohingya—which “we will build a fence with our bones if necessary” to keep out. His pamphlets say, “Myanmar is currently facing a most dangerous and fearful poison that is severe enough to eradicate all civilization.”

Relatedly, consider the words of Fr. Daniel Byantoro, a Muslim convert to Orthodox Christianity:

For thousands of years my country (Indonesia) was a Hindu Buddhist kingdom. The last Hindu king was kind enough to give a tax exempt property for the first Muslim missionary to live and to preach his religion. Slowly the followers of the new religion were growing, and after they became so strong the kingdom was attacked, those who refused to become Muslims had to flee for their life to the neighboring island of Bali or to a high mountain of Tengger, where they have been able to keep their religion until now. Slowly from the Hindu Buddhist Kingdom, Indonesia became the largest Islamic country in the world. If there is any lesson to be learnt by Americans at all, the history of my country is worth pondering upon. We are not hate mongering, bigoted people; rather, we are freedom loving, democracy loving and human loving people. We just don’t want this freedom and democracy to be taken away from us by our ignorance and misguided “political correctness”, and the pretension of tolerance. (Source: Facing Islam, endorsement section).

But surely all of this is history? Surely having been at the receiving end of persecution, the Rohingya have come to learn how it feels, and, accordingly, come to deplore the idea of victimizing others simply because they are different? Unfortunately, that does not seem to be the case.

For example, in January of 2020, Muslim Rohingya in a Bangladeshi refugee camp savagely beat a dozen Christians in their midst. “[They] attacked us, the Christians. They looted our houses, and beat up many Christian members. At least 12 Christians have been undergoing treatment at different hospitals and clinics,” a Christian reported, before adding, “We came under attack due to our faith…. On May 10, 11, and 13 last year, this same group of terrorists attacked us. They want us to leave this camp. They have been attacking us systematically.”

Discussing that spate of attacks, the Rohingya Christian Assembly from India said that Muslim Rohingya “attacked the whole Christian community in Kutupalong Camp… Approximately 25 Christian families are displaced. It is winter and very cold, the victims have many minor children with them.” The group added that mobs armed with machetes—“hundreds in many groups”—invaded and destroyed every Christian home at night.

Last Christmas, 2021, in India, hundreds of Rohingya migrant Muslim workers, some lethally armed, violently attacked a group of Christian migrant workers near a factory. According to the report, “A scuffle broke out at around 11.30 pm when some Muslims objected to carols being sung by Christian migrants from Nagaland and Manipur. While they were celebrating and dancing late at night, Muslim migrants attacked them.” Several police officers and others who tried to intervene were also injured in the riot; fanatical Rohingya even “tried to burn policemen alive.”

Around the same time, Muslim Rohingya beat a Christian Rohingya in their refugee camp in Bangladesh. According to Saydul Amin, “I have been persecuted since I revealed that I am a Christian. I no longer feel safe in the camp.”

The same report quotes David Sunir, another Christian who had been beaten in a Rohingya refugee camp: “We Christians are a minority, and we live in fear.”

It should be noted that something similar is happening here in the West. Reports of Muslim refugees (supposedly “victims” in need of asylum) attacking and killing the Christian minorities intermingled with them in European-based refugee camps regularly surface.

Indeed, at one point, teams of trained killers disguised as refugees were sent by ISIS into U.N. refugee camps to kill Christians, including “in their beds,” and to kidnap young girls to sell or use as slaves. This was reported after an ISIS operative “got cold feet and renounced jihad after witnessing Christians helping out other refugees within the camp. He then revealed that he had been sent with an Islamist hit squad to eliminate Christians as part of the hate group’s ideological drive to wipe the [Christian] religion off the map.”

The point here is not to argue that all Muslims are troublemakers and therefore “deserve” whatever treatment they get. Rather, it is, and to reiterate the question initiating this article, to ask: How is one supposed to feel pity and want to provide sanctuary for a minority group that, once it has the chance, treats the minorities in its midst atrociously—and for no other reason than because they are different, in this case, because they are “infidels”?

https://pjmedia.com/columns/raymond-ibrahim/2022/05/19/why-its-so-hard-to-pity-muslims-n1599266

Monday, May 9, 2022

THE LEFT’S MOTHER’S DAY SPECTACLE

THE LEFT’S MOTHER’S DAY SPECTACLE

BY STEVEN HAYWARD IN 2022 ELECTIONABORTION

On the Ricochet podcast yesterday, I observed that for certain pro-abortion fanatics, it is not sufficient to defend a “woman’s right to choose” on the grounds that it is a sad and tragic necessity under some circumstances—a view that likely commands majority respect if not support. Rather, like the Southern slaveholders before the Civil War, the most radical leftist elements celebrate abortion as a positive good. You can even get t-shirts expressing pride in having had an abortion.

Which led to my analysis that the political fallout for the upcoming election may depend on which side of the debate commits the most unforced errors. Todd Akin likely cost himself a Senate seat in Missouri in 2012 with his poorly phrased comments on abortion in cases of rape. But I suspect heading into November it is more likely Democrats will commit more unforced errors with their abortion absolutism, which is not favored by a majority of Americans. I predicted that Democrats were likely to go into “full Wellstone funeral mode,” if you remember that grotesque incident.

Looks like we might not have to wait long:

Should Catholics worry about abortion protests disrupting Mother’s Day Mass?

Multiple reports and social media posts are warning that abortion activists will disrupt Mass on Sunday — Mother’s Day. Should Catholics take these threats seriously?

The Diocese of Charleston, the Archdiocese of New York, and some churches in Washington, D.C., are taking extra precautions. According to a statement shared by the Diocese of Charleston, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops is now involved and warning parishes. Police in Washington, D.C., and in New York are also on alert.

Many Catholic parishes are sending out messages like this:

Why, you might ask, disrupt Catholic church services, and not Baptists or other pro-life Protestant denominations? Because hatred of the Catholic Church has become a core principle of the left, full stop. The reasons for this go beyond the coincidence that that the five Supreme Court justices who (may) form the majority to overturn Roe are Catholics. To quote Whittaker Chambers (a Quaker), “the Catholic Church is the only fully consistent conservative position.” That’s why.

I can think of few things that will alienate moderate voters than shrieking leftists disrupting church services. Though it is fitting that they might do so on Birthing Person’s Day Mother’s Day.

P.S. Damon Linker, who is resolutely pro-abortion, writes in The Week:

[T]he Democratic position isn’t so popular. Just three months ago, 48 Senate Democrats voted in favor of a bill — the Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA) — that would enshrine the right to an abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. That’s despite the fact that polls show opposition to abortion rising to the mid-60s during the second trimester and then all the way up to 80 percent in the third trimester. The WHPA also would have knocked down parental consent laws in 37 states. The most recent Gallup poll to ask about parental-consent laws (from 2011) found 71 percent support for them.

If congressional Democrats pass the legislation many activists are now advising, they could well end up overshooting public opinion. . .

UPDATE—Apparently not even waiting for Mother’s Day:

Monday, December 20, 2021

Liz Wheeler on Salvation Army ‘suffering’: That’s what happens when you call white donors racists

Liz Wheeler on Salvation Army ‘suffering’: That’s what happens when you call white donors racists


(Video: Fox News)

The Salvation Army is reportedly losing donors, and conservatives couldn’t be any happier about it. The reason why is because of the Christian charity’s decision to go “woke.”

Speaking on Fox News’ “Fox News Primetime” this Wednesday, conservative commentator Liz Wheeler argued quite plainly that this is what they get for promoting racial essentialism.

“When you call your white donors, tell them to apologize for their racism, tell your white donors that because of the color of their skin they’re inherently racist and there’s no way to avoid being racist — I mean, this is a horrible thing. It’s a false thing. It’s a toxic allegation,” she said.

It’s racial essentialism, and it’s spread to every corner of the nation, which is why, she argued, it’s fundamental that those caught peddling this racist garbage suffer “consequences.”

Including the Salvation Army.

“It’s exactly what we’re seeing in other cultural areas of our country. This is what we saw in public school systems. This is the principles of critical race theory. This is the principles of the 1619 Project, where these people, these far-leftists, are trying to divide our country by race to tell people who have white skin that they are oppressors inherently, and people who have black skin that they are oppressed inherently, based only on that immutable characteristic,” Wheeler continued.

“This is a huge turn-off for everybody in our country, regardless of your political stripe. And I’m glad the Salvation Army is suffering these consequences because they shouldn’t be able to tell people who aren’t racist they are racist and just get away with it,” she added.

Last month, a report emerged that the Salvation Army was promoting racial essentialism by asking its white donors — and its white donors only — to essentially apologize for being white.

The charity was specifically directing white donors to certain “anti-racist” resources containing critical race theory propaganda about white people, including instructions on holding what one might describe as struggle sessions.

One of the resources reads as follows: “And as we engage in conversations about race and racism, we must keep in mind that sincere repentance and apologies are necessary if we want to move towards racial reconciliation. We recognize that it is a profound challenge to sit on the hot seat and listen with an open heart to the hurt and anger of the wounded. Yet, we are all hardwired to desire justice and fairness, so the need to receive a sincere apology is necessary.”

(Source: Salvation Army resource)

Despite the report emerging in late November, it turns out donors have been dropping off for months.

On Nov. 1st, for instance, Greg Koukl, a Christian radio show host, posted an open letter to the Salvation Army announcing his decision to stop donating. He attributed his decision to the previously mentioned “woke” resources.

“I recently became aware of your International Social Justice Commission material, ‘Let’s Talk about Racism.’ I read virtually every word of the material in every session and surveyed your bibliography. It rapidly became clear to me that TSA has fallen for critical race theory lock, stock, and barrel,” the letter reads.

Look:

Speaking earlier on the “Fox News Primetime” segment Wednesday, Kira Davis of RedState added that she herself had spoken to a disgruntled former Salvation Army fan “a couple months ago.”

“I was talking to a young man just very recently, a couple months ago, who said he was raised in the Salvation Army church, which I didn’t even really consider that this is a church people go to,” she said.

“And he said he had recently left because it was getting too ‘woke.’ Those were his words. And I didn’t understand at the time. I was like, I wonder what that means. And now we see this, so it sounds to me like this has been percolating for a while,” Davis added.

Listen:

Yet despite the losses, Salvation Army appears to be kind of doubling down.

Following last month’s reporting, the charity responded by allegedly withdrawing their resources for “appropriate review” and claiming they hadn’t gone woke, but turning around and issuing a statement doubling down on the need to fight back against alleged racism.

This week the president of Color Us United, a nonprofit that’s been instrumental in fighting back against “woke” ideology and promoting a “race-blind America,” reported that the charity’s internal survey on “racism within the Salvation Army” disproves their claim of having not gone “woke.”

“Going through the survey, it became apparent that the survey was attempting to lead me to making only one conclusion about The Salvation Army – that it harbored problematic racism. This belief is one of the core tenets of critical race theory. Critical race theorists teach that racism is ubiquitous in all aspects of American life,” Kenny Xu reported for The Daily Wire.

“They also teach that it works systemically; that is, by being ingrained in the systems and institutions that operate in society. Their primary evidence of the system being racist is the reality that individuals from different demographics have different life outcomes on average, without taking into account any variables that might impact said life outcomes apart from the color of their skin. All of these concepts are reflected in The Salvation Army’s survey,” he continued.