Showing posts with label Occupy movement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Occupy movement. Show all posts

Saturday, February 5, 2022

FELONY MURDER IN A GOOD CAUSE: A COMMENT

FELONY MURDER IN A GOOD CAUSE: A COMMENT

BY SCOTT JOHNSON IN LAW ENFORCEMENTMINNESOTARIOTS

After posting my extended comments on the sentencing of Montez Lee by Judge Wilhelmina Wright yesterday, I received a message from a knowledgeable law enforcement source on the investigation of the orgy of wanton destruction in the Twin Cities riots — block after block of burned buildings, all in the name of George Floyd, what a crock, as the source puts it.

My understanding is that the agents working the Twin Cities in the aftermath of the riots tried to make as many cases as they could, but the message from the United States Attorney’s Office was that they would prosecute only “a handful of cases,” precisely as I described the number in my comments. The agents themselves were given to understand that only a gesture of enforcement would be made.

Now to learn that the United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota sought a substantial downward departure in sentencing in one of the best cases sickens him. Why should they bother? What incentive does law enforcement have for working hard and perfecting criminal cases if the prosecutors will only lodge token prosecutions? The Office of the United States Attorney should be ashamed.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/01/felony-murder-in-a-good-cause-a-comment.php

Saturday, January 29, 2022

Biden's DOJ Thinks BLM Criminals Deserve Lesser Sentences

Biden's DOJ Thinks BLM Criminals Deserve Lesser Sentences

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Earlier this month, a BLM rioter was sentenced to ten years in federal prison for burning down a Minneapolis pawn shop during the George Floyd riots in May 2020.

Sentencing guidelines, however, recommended a sentence of nearly double that. It turns out that Joe Biden’s Justice Department recommended a lesser sentence because the rioter, Montez Terriel Lee Jr., of Rochester, New York, committed his crime in the name of Black Lives Matter.

According to a memo from the U.S. Attorney’s office for the District of Minnesota, even though Lee “committed a crime that cost a man his life,” his motives for committing the crime merited a lesser sentence.

“Mr. Lee’s motive for setting the fire is a foremost issue. Mr. Lee credibly states that he was in the streets to protest unlawful police violence against black men, and there is no basis to disbelieve this statement,” the memo reads. “Mr. Lee, appropriately, acknowledges that he ‘could have demonstrated in a different way,’ but that he was ‘caught up in the fury of the mob after living as a black man watching his peers suffer at the hands of police.'”

“As anyone watching the news world-wide knows, many other people in Minnesota were similarly caught up,” the memo continues. “There appear to have been many people in those days looking only to exploit the chaos and disorder in the interests of personal gain or random violence. There appear also to have been many people who felt angry, frustrated, and disenfranchised, and who were attempting, in many cases in an unacceptably reckless and dangerous manner, to give voice to those feelings. Mr. Lee appears to be squarely in this latter category.”

Because supporting Black Lives Matter is apparently the key to a reduced sentence in Joe Biden’s Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney’s office requested Lee get 144 months instead of the recommended 235-240 months. Instead, the Obama-nominated Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright sentenced Lee to 120 months.

So, if you’re in legal trouble, just say you support Black Lives Matter, and the Biden Justice Department will give you one of these:

Courtesy of the author
https://pjmedia.com/uncategorized/matt-margolis/2022/01/27/bidens-doj-thinks-blm-criminals-deserve-lesser-sentences-n1553701

Saturday, June 12, 2021

Chuck Grassley to DOJ: Explain Discrepancy In Application Of Law For BLM/Antifa vs. Capitol Rioters

Chuck Grassley to DOJ: Explain Discrepancy In Application Of Law For BLM/Antifa vs. Capitol Rioters

“The law must be applied equally without regard to party, power or privilege. When the Department of Justice treats similar criminal acts differently, such conduct erodes faith in our governmental institutions and the law.”

https://youtu.be/F6kqiadrMVg

National Democrats, up to and including the Biden administration, want you to believe that our government is so fragile that a couple hundred unarmed trespassers in the Capitol Building on January 6th posed a very real threat to our Republic.

Let that sink in.  They expect us to believe that our government was—literally—on the verge of collapse during those few hours.  Keep in mind that not one of the hundreds arrested, many of whom are still being detained, was armed.

The one and only person who died violently, at someone else’s hand, at the Capitol on January 6th was an unarmed Air Force vet, Ashli Babbitt, who was fatally shot by an as-yet unnamed Capitol police officer.

If the DOJ charging documents about the Capitol events tell us anything, they tell us, loudly and clearly, that there was no coordination except by a handful of the most inept “insurrectionists” in the history of insurrection.  Some fat old guy was reportedly napping across the river beside a cache of arms, ready to bring them in to the four people who knew about him . . . if they managed to rouse him from his peaceful slumber on their walkie-talkies.

This is the violent overthrow of our government that we are supposed to believe—despite a multi-million dollar budget slathered on America’s federal law enforcement—we were within seconds of seeing manifest?  A handful of unarmed nutters with walkie talkies were just too much for our government to withstand, too much for DHS, for the FBI, for the Capitol and DC police to handle?  We came this close to “losing our democracy” . . . to a handful of unarmed overzealous fantasists?  Really?

Of course no one believes that.  Not national Democrats, not the majority of their media mouthpieces, and certainly not anyone affiliated with, much less leading, America’s alphabet federal law enforcement agencies.

The latest leftist lie that the events at the Capitol on January 6th are the “worst act of political violence since the Civil War” is beyond laughable and aimed at the stupid, gullible, and uniformed (i.e. Democrat voters).  This historically-inaccurate hyperbolic nonsense is being peddled by everyone on the left from Joe Biden right down to the dregs of propagandist “journalism.”

The Democrats need to have a Reichstag moment in order to facilitate their shutting down of any and all dissent.  They need the events at the Capitol to be a crisis, and they need that crisis in order to justify expansive federal surveillance and persecution of their political “enemies” among the American people.

That “coup” and “insurrection” were just the ticket.  After all, who needs an actual crisis to declare a war on “domestic terror”?  Not the Dems because they have the media and Big Tech protecting this ludicrous lie that America was about to be undone by a ragtag bunch of selfie-takers.

Federal law enforcement don’t really care if the stinky commie hippies are the “enemy” or if normal Americans are.  Agency goals include, always, expanding power and control.  If that creeps into monitoring, surveilling, and ultimately persecuting Americans, that’s a win.

Our  federal government is currently waging a “war on domestic terror,” a “war”against non-woke American citizens who reject the racist, communist left’s divisive and destructive agenda.  That the events on January 6th were an historically minor incident that is dwarfed by (as but one example) Obama associate Bill Ayers’ Weather Underground setting off a bomb on the U.S. Senate side of the Capitol Building is beside the point.

Yet under the premise that a bunch of random, unconnected, unarmed people could actually topple our government, the FBI beclowned itself raiding an Alaska couple whom they well knew had never even entered the Capitol building, and the federal government is holding people for months on end who are guilty of, at most, trespassing.  Indeed, at least one man held in connection to the Capitol events was allegedly beaten so severely by jail guards that he is permanently blinded in one eye.

This is police state intimidation, it’s totalitarian political oppression, it’s banana republic political prisoner nonsense that is an absolute embarrassment and disgrace not just to the DOJ and FBI but to our entire country.

Meanwhile, BLM and antifa vandals, rioters, arsonists, and assailants are arrested and returned to the streets in record time.  Among the many people pushing bail funds for these violent criminals was then-senator and now VP Kamala Harris.

BLM and antifa criminals can literally commit arson, vandalism, assault, be filmed doing it, and be released the same day to continue their illegal activities.  Meanwhile, people who wandered into the Capitol on January 6th to take few selfies, and who didn’t set fire to or vandalize a single thing (or set up some crazy ‘autonomous zone’ that explicitly rejects U.S. government and law) are being held, beaten, permanently disfigured, and charged to the fullest extent of the law.

This disparate, blatantly unequal treatment of the Capitol Hill trespassers who are being persecuted not for actual crimes but for political purposes versus the criminal burning, looting, and murder by BLM and antifa throughout last summer (and continuing in Democrat-run cities to this day) is an outrage.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is demanding an explanation from the DOJ about this unequal application of the law.

Sharyl Attkisson reports:

Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is asking the U.S. Justice Department to explain the differences between the prosecutions of rioters at violent and destructive riots over the summer and fall of 2020 and the January 6th Capitol rioters.

The letter questions whether the law has been applied equally to the people who participated in riots during the summer and fall of 2020 and the people who were present at the Capitol on January 6th.

“The law must be applied equally without regard to party, power or privilege. When the Department of Justice treats similar criminal acts differently, such conduct erodes faith in our governmental institutions and the law.”

Grassley asks about the numbers of people arrested, charged, released on bail, and fully prosecuted during the summer 2020 Portland, Oregon riots that involved a months’ long violent seize of a federal courthouse compared to the same data for the January 6th riot.

Letter excerpts via Sharyl Attkisson:

Do read the whole thing, and if you are not yet subscribed to Sharyl Attkisson’s newsletter, please consider doing so.  She’s one of the last actual journalists still doing actual journalism; she follows the story regardless if it bites Democrats or Republicans.

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/06/chuck-grassley-to-doj-explain-discrepancy-in-application-of-law-for-blm-antifa-vs-capitol-rioters/

Sunday, June 6, 2021

Legacy media notices Portland is burning after a year of reporting on 'mostly peaceful' riots (Screen shots of tweets in linked piece)

Legacy media notices Portland is burning after a year of reporting on 'mostly peaceful' riots

After gaslighting the American public into believing that riots were "mostly peaceful," the disconnected press is now noticing the correlation between rampant crime and the far-left.

Legacy media notices Portland is burning after a year of reporting on 'mostly peaceful' riots

by Mia Cathell The Post Millennial

A year ago, outlets like the Washington Post were telling a very different story.

"Help Me Find Trump's 'Anarchists' in Portland," asked the New York Times opinion columnist Nicholas Kristof in late July. "I've been on the front lines of the protests here, searching for the 'radical-left anarchists' who President Trump says are on Portland streets each evening," Kristof introduced the piece.

"Good morning from wonderful Portland, where the city is not under siege and buildings are not burning to the ground," tweeted CNN correspondent Josh Campbell who covers "national security, law enforcement, and racial justice."

"I also ate my breakfast burrito outside today and so far haven't been attacked by shadowy gangs of Antifa commandos," Campbell wrote in the since-deleted tweet.

Just the night before, Antifa rioters set ablaze the apartment complex where Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler resided at the time, among other buildings torched.

The weekend before, Trump supporter Aaron "Jay" Danielson was murdered by self-identified Antifa member Michael Forest Reinoehl in downtown Portland.

Campbell's daytime utopian picture of Portland in September gaslighted an entire nation with the CNN reporter's whimsical spin on Antifa terrorism which often breaks out at night. Others also downplayed anarchistic violence across America.

CNN commentator Chris Cillizza claimed in August that former President Donald Trump labeled the civil unrest in American cities as "riots" out of "desperation." The image that Cillizza tweeted shows flames consuming half of the screen. Cillizza's likes were overwhelmed by comments containing sharp criticism.

Journalistic elites and legacy outlets refused to see reality and instead mocked those who were concerned about recent trends. A handful of smug reporters joined Campbell, lounging in parks and posting pictures of how safe it appeared.

"I went for a belated NYC run this morning and am sorry to report that I saw very few black-clad anarchists," New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote in September. The multi-part Twitter thread sneered: "Also, the city is not yet in flames."

The troubles the masses spoke of were contained in certain crime-ridden areas. Krugman wasn't threatened in the neighborhood that the Nobel laureate called home. The jolly experiences of the upper social class proved nothing but ignorance.

"Had to shoot my way through a whole bunch of Antifa roadblocks but it was worth it to get this fruity drink," Gary Shteyngart, a New York Times bestselling author with over 500,000 Twitter followers, tweeted in September from his perch on the Lower East Side.

"Washington, D.C., is simply out of control," tweeted Washington Post journalist Dan Zak. The since-deleted tweet in August ignored the leftist mobs harassing patrons dining at outdoor restaurants that same month. Unsuspecting customers were berated into joining the social justice protests and forced to raise fists in solidarity against "white supremacy" in the nation's capital.

The fad among some high-profile personalities was nauseating as the verified blue checkmarks showcased daylight photographs of well-to-do scenes undamaged.

Meanwhile, arson, looting, vandalism, and gunfire engulfed blocks at nightfall.

The Washington Post published an article Monday titled, "Anarchists and an increase in violent crime hijack Portland's social justice movement." The piece attracted back patting from the left-wing publication's colleagues and allies.

Liberal pundit Jonathan Chait, a writer for New York magazine praised the Washington Post senior national correspondent Scott Wilson's "very upsetting" report about how de-policing Portland has harmed minority communities.

In mid-May, the city of Portland reached 30 homicide victims this year, which is five times the number recorded during the same period in 2020, "a frightening pace that could see more slayings here by the end of the year than in the past four decades," Wilson cited in the Washington Post article.

Since the 100-plus days of consecutive riots, Portland had witnessed an under-policed state and "a return to an old-school style of gun violence" reminiscent of the "tit-for-tat cycle" of fatal reprisals, "almost always among young men of color," Wilson noted. The Portland Police Bureau counted 348 shootings through April, which more than double those recorded over the first four months of last year.

Most residents have even called for more police, not less. The Portland Police Bureau is authorized to have 1,001 sworn officers. A recent May poll conducted by The Oregonian found that three-quarters of Portland-area residents did not want police officer levels to decline more than the figures have. Just more than half said residents favored an increase in the number of police officers.

At the moment, the bureau has about 900 officers, a shortage that city officials blame on the lack of prioritized hiring and that police leaders attribute to insufficient support as well as funding, Wilson wrote. Portland Police Bureau chief Charles "Chuck" Lovell told the Washington Post that more than 120 sworn officers have left the department in the past nine months.

The City Council last year cut about $27 million from the $200 million police budget—about $11 million because of the pandemic-inflicted budget crisis and $15 million as part of the "Defund the Police" effort, Wilson cited.

A police bureau unit was disbanded last July that focused on gun violence, a high-profile initiative that had been designed to help the agency anticipate rising gang- and gun-related crime as the protests began fading. Lovell, who is black, said the phenomenon "bears the brunt on the African American community" as the shootings "have an outsized impact on people of color."

The rising gun violence and the downtown demonstrations had placed stress on the police department's resources. Police response time to emergency calls has more than doubled over the past eight years with more than 40 minutes of wait-time before calls are even fielded by emergency dispatchers, Wilson reported.

Back in January, an Antifa mob tried to stop police from responding to an armed man threatening to harm others and himself in downtown Portland.

Portland Police sent in its Enhanced Crisis Intervention Team but was interrupted by hostile Antifa protesters who were gathered nearby at Powell's Books calling for The Post Millennial's editor-at-large Andy Ngo's book to be banned.

The suicidal man's mother arrived on scene and pleaded with the mob to disperse but the crowd ignored the woman's cries. The escalating incident forced police to call for all available riot-control officers from the North and East Precincts, causing major backlog in police responses to attend to other emergency calls.

Chait tweeted the glowing sentiment gushing over Wilson's piece with utter shock at the revelation that police exist to police crime. However, the prominent writer was almost eclipsed by the rising ratio of comments and quote tweets.

One user pointed out that defunded police leading to out-of-control crime is "a feature" of Antifa's plan, "not a bug." The account then uploaded an image of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook by Antifa ideologue Mark Bray.

"Is the article supposed to be surprising? Some have been highlighting these concerns for months," tweeted Checks and Balances co-founder Jonathan Adler who rallies conservative and libertarian lawyers standing up for the rule of law.

"Shocking," remarked City Journal editor Charles Fain Lehman who had pinpointed the problem in February: the rise in crime may be due to the "climate of lawlessness" that has "reigned" major Democrat-run cities since the start of the vehement anti-police protests. "It should also come as no surprise that the Bay Area, which has been at the forefront of progressive criminal-justice reforms for years, is bearing the brunt of these attacks," Lehman quipped, faulting "soft-on-crime leaders" in Northern California who have broken the criminal justice system.

Some of the conservative observers compared the media's changing tone on Antifa to the about-face over the Wuhan lab leak theory, which several outlets admitted is now credible but was dismissed at first because Trump pitched its probability.

Until now, the political left has framed the possibility that COVID-19 was leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology as racist, fringe, and senseless conspiracy.

However, in recent weeks, the speculation has garnered substantial credence.

Thursday, June 3, 2021

Antifa's origins and where they go from here

 Antifa's origins and where they go from here

Jack Posobiec's The Antifa: Stories from Inside the Black Bloc tracks the far-left militants from communist radicals in Europe to their emergence as a threat to Western democracy.

Antifa emerged full throated and ready for action in the summer of 2020. Its sudden visibility as a force acting against Western civilization took many by surprise, but if you'd been following along, you could have seen its origins, first in Europe, and then in the anti-government and anti-corporatist movements in the US. Jack Posobiec's new book The Antifa: Stories from Inside the Black Bloc, finds Antifa's roots and tracks their rise as a far-left fighting force that has their roots not simply in anti-fascism, as the left so frequently cites, but in communist and anarchist movements whose intent is to overthrow the democratically-elected state.

The far-leftist group became a global phenomenon in the late 1990s, and despite President Joe Biden's supposition that the militants are simply "an idea," the leaderless movement has grown and expanded. They protested and rioted in Seattle, across the US and Europe, and because they are a loose affiliation, Posobiec says, they are able to maintain tactical standards and methods of aggression through the proliferation of texts, posts on message boards and social media, and keeping these controls in place at public actions.

Antifa is largely unchecked. Governments refuse to address their terrorist activities, and that's one problem, but adding to that is that universities, mainstream media, social media, multinational corporations, and Democrats in the US all give cover to Antifa. In revealed conversations between President Donald Trump and his FBI Director Christopher Wray, it's clear that the willingness to overlook Antifa violence is not a partisan persuasion. Plenty of people simply assume that the banner waving, black bloc wearing, chanting mobs are not a threat to Western life.

Corporatization and corporate support of Antifa emboldens them because they are getting the approval they seek from the very entities they seek to destroy. The rhetorical support big companies give to Antifa is either a result of their not understanding just what it is that they're supporting or because they actually believe they are supporting a worthwhile undertaking.

"Ultimately, it is culture that matters most, for it is culture that shapes beliefs and ideals, determining how we see the world and act within it," Posobiec writes. "When the right surrendered the culture, the left quickly moved into the vacuum, led by the Clintons and Obamas who embraced pop culture."

Perhaps the West's tolerance of Antifa has something to do with the deep shame we feel at our prosperity. Antifa tells us we are awful sinners for buying and consuming, and deep down, we believe it. But we're telling ourselves the wrong story. We've constructed a narrative in the West that will intentionally lead to our own destruction, we've bought into the lies about capitalism is more harmful than communism.

At issue is the conflict between the idea that humanity should be divided into groups or respected as individuals. Fascism is a bundle of sticks, and the anti-fascists are in favor of group identity over individual rights. They are clear on this, and their actions show that outright. There is no leader of Antifa because there are no individuals. There is no freedom of expression, because there are no single voices with independent perspectives, there is just one voice, the sound of many speaking in unison.

Why do we feel like we owe assistance to those who want to take us down? Posobiec shows how these anti-fascists are in fact fascists who do not have the good of society at heart, but are only interested in destruction. He details first hand accounts from his early encounter with them, at the Deplorable, an Inauguration party in 2017, through his infiltration of the so-called Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone in Seattle in the summer of 2020. Democrat leaders have drunk the Kool-Aid, have come to believe that the US is an oppressor, globally, and instead they refuse to recognize the violence inherent in this movement.

"Nurtured in the world of fiction over fact, and feelings over history," Posobiec writes, "Antifa's radicals sincerely believe that anyone who does not support Black Lives Matter in every particular is a fascist. They cannot conceive of Republicans as NOT being a fascist; indeed, a closet supporter of Hitler. Their ideological opponents are not fellow citizens with a different point of view; they are enemies who must, at the very least, be silenced."

The furthering of Antifa's goals are made possible because of their loose organizational structure. They command conformity, demand silence, and perpetuate a false narrative of their superiority to the rest of us plebs. "Antifa is not waging war against any individual, but against democracy itself and especially capitalism," Posobiec writes.

Trump classed Antifa as a domestic terror group. But Biden's AG Merrick Garland is focused primarily on white supremacists. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, in the Bush administration, defined terrorist as actions that were designed to terrorize the community. And that's what Antifa does. With a loose affiliation pulling people together through adherence to a set of rules, Antifa operates like a hydra: When one head is lopped off another springs up to take its place.

Posobiec defines extremism thusly: "Extremism means individuals or groups who justify the use of violence to achieve their political goals." That's exactly what Antifa has does and continues to do. Antifa commits acts, such as the endless nights of rioting in Portland, the enforced capitulation of political leaders, and the silencing and threatening of journalists, and justify those actions as in service to their aims.

These aims are primarily destruction, capitulation, and the decimation of Western values. To attain these aims, they use fear, aggression, and manipulation. Elected leaders have become complicit, straight up to the presidency. Corporate leaders signal their virtue by gushing praise at what they see as the moral correctitude of those who call out the West for her original sins. But Antifa, as Posobiec notes, will use these shills until they haven't a use for them anymore, and then the mainstream supporters of Antifa will be set ablaze too.

https://thepostmillennial.com/antifas-origins-and-where-they-go-from-here/

Tuesday, June 1, 2021

Former Seattle Police Chief: The Media Lied About Violence In CHOP Zone

Former Seattle Police Chief: The Media Lied About Violence In CHOP Zone

AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

Former Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best suggested that the media wasn’t honest about the “mostly peaceful protests” in Seattle’s “Capitol Hill Organized Protest” (CHOP zone), also briefly called the not-so-cool cool-sounding CHAZ, (Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone).

Best, who resigned after Seattle’s city council cut $3 million from the Seattle Police Dept. budget, made the following comments on Jerry Radcliffe’s “Reducing Crime” podcast.

“I would read stories about the peaceful protests. I go, ‘Well, part of it was peaceful.’ But I was standing 20 feet away from a hail of rocks. I was looking right at them hail down, feet from me. I was behind a telephone pole,” Best said.

RecommendedPolice Chief Carmen Best’s Resignation Email Shows She’s the Adult in the Room

Best went on to say that she was confused when reading about the interactions with rioters in the media because reporters claimed the violence was a peaceful protest and that protesters were treated unfairly and harshly by police who threw tear gas and used pepper spray on them. Best said that they did use such tactics, but that their use “wasn’t arbitrary.”

“But certainly, we were trying to look as non-threatening as possible, maybe not have the riot shields up. But once we know we’re going to be getting rocks and bottles thrown at us, I have a responsibility as a chief to make sure people have protecting gear. We can’t just leave them out there with soft hat and rocks are being thrown and whatever,” she said.

Chief Best talked about how she had to deal with a violent, armed, and seemingly leaderless CHOP zone that the press said was “mostly peaceful” in a time the Seattle mayor ironically referred to as the “Summer of Love.”

“But I’m telling you, the whole time, the officers and the people who were responding to that area knew it was a problem. And we had been saying, ‘Look, our response times are up. We’ve had rapes. We had robberies. We had assaults.” And I remember giving a press conference at some time along the way and holding up the reports, because every time I said something, people would say we were just making it up. I go, ‘No, I have police reports of real victims that you can look at to verify these things are happening.”

“I got to tell you, though, we were pretty clear. I just thought it was terrible and that we had a real problem and we need to get on this and figure this out.

Best resigned after the city council made the following cuts to the Seattle Police Department:

  • Cut 32 officers from patrol – $533,000
  • Reduced specialized units, including officers assigned to mounted unit, school resource officers, homeland security, harbor patrol, SWAT team – $250,000
  • Removed officers from Navigation Team, ensuring homeless neighbors are not retraumatized by armed patrol officers – $216,000
  • Reduced staff budget through recognizing expected attrition – $500,000
  • Reduced administrative costs, including salaries, community outreach, public affairs
  • Cut $56,000 from training and travel expenses
  • Cut recruitment and retention – $800,000
  • Transferred victim advocates from SPD to Human Services Department – $377,000 impact
  • Removed two sworn officer positions from the 911 Emergency Call Center

Chief Best joked on the podcast that she didn’t do every police job in Seattle before she retired but she did most, including working in “gangs, narcotics, robbery, chief of investigations, deputy chief, chief of police,” and even had fun posing as a prostitute decoy. “It was hilarious.”

RecommendedSeattle Mayor Finally Sends Police to Restore Law and Order to CHOP Antifastan

Chief Best, the first black female chief of Seattle, is just one of many chiefs to resign as a result of last year’s rioting after the death of George Floyd.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/kevindowneyjr/2021/05/27/former-seattle-police-chief-the-media-lied-about-violence-in-chop-zone-n1450324

Thursday, January 14, 2021

Rep. Mo Brooks Says There's Evidence Antifa Was Involved in Assault on Capitol

Rep. Mo Brooks Says There's Evidence Antifa Was Involved in Assault on Capitol

(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) is imploring people not to rush to judgment on the assault on the Capitol that took place Wednesday afternoon and to wait for an investigation.

All may not be (and likely is not) what appears,” he said on Twitter Thursday morning. “Evidence growing that fascist ANTIFA orchestrated Capitol attack with clever mob control tactics.”

Here’s the evidence he cited on Twitter:

Brooks says that on Monday he was warned by a fellow congressman whom he did not name of “a growing ANTIFA threat” and was advised to sleep in his office and not leave Capitol complex. Brooks reported that he heeded that advice and has slept on his office floor for four straight nights.

On Tuesday, Brooks says that a Capitol Police officer warned congressman “that intelligence suggested fascist ANTIFA was going to try to infiltrate the Trump rally by dressing like Trump supporters.”

On the same day, Brooks says Capitol Police advised that “it [was] best not to leave [the] Capitol complex.”

Finally, Brooks referenced “Evidence, much public, surfacing that many Capitol assaulters were fascist ANTIFAs, not Trump supporters.”

Nevertheless, Brooks said that “time will reveal truth,” and warned people not to “rush to judgment.” He then accused the fake news media, “whose political judgment drives their reporting,” of trying to fool people.

Rest assured, Rep. Brooks was not trying to justify or excuse Trump supporters who were involved and expressed unequivocally that all those who participated should be fully prosecuted.

While it’s possible that there were members of antifa involved, it cannot be denied that Trump supporters were, too. Such actions do nothing to advance the rioters’ cause and are actually more likely to derail them. I don’t doubt we’ll learn a lot more about who was involved in the coming days and weeks, but at least Republicans have condemned the violence, something Democrats weren’t so willing to do last summer when cities nationwide were on fire.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/01/07/rep-mo-brooks-says-theres-evidence-antifa-was-involved-in-assault-on-capitol-n1315547

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Remember When the Left Loved Rioters and Kamala Harris Loved a Group That Bailed Them Out of Jail?

Remember When the Left Loved Rioters and Kamala Harris Loved a Group That Bailed Them Out of Jail?

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Pool via AP

In response to the protests on Capitol Hill, Joe Biden called on President Trump “to go on national television now to fulfill his oath and defend the Constitution” by demanding an end to “this siege.”

“America is so much better than what we’re seeing today,” he added.

But last summer, Joe Biden was singing a different tune. “The act of protesting should never be allowed to overshadow the reason we protest. It should not drive people away from the just cause that protest is meant to advance,” he said in a statement on May 31, 2020, amid the riots in response to the death of George Floyd. Biden, like many others in the Democratic Party, refused to condemn the violent rioting and looting that resulted in dozens of deaths and as much as $2 billion in property damage. As the rioters burned down buildings, assaulted and murdered people, they referred to them as “peaceful protesters” and refused to condemn them.

It wasn’t until polling suggested their support of the BLM riots was backfiring that Biden and others started flip-flopping and condemning the protests. But before that, the political left was so enamored with the violent protests that many donated and promoted the Minnesota Freedom Fund, a group that accepts donations to pay the bail of criminals.

The group raised a staggering $35 million in the wake of the death of George Floyd, as violent protests and looting plagued Minneapolis. Hollywood celebrities promoted the bail fund group, and so did Senator Kamala Harris, who urged her followers on Twitter to donate to the group “to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.”

At least 13 staffers on Biden’s campaign posted on Twitter about their donations to the Minnesota Freedom Fund, which opposes the concept of cash bail, and uses donations to pay bail fees in Minneapolis. In addition to paying for the bail of rioters, according to a local news report, MFF also “bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.” In July, the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF) paid the bail of a man accused of sexually assaulting an eight-year-old girl, allowing him to get out of jail, according to court records obtained by the Daily Caller.

In every conceivable way, Democrats have tolerated, even condoned political violence. Whether it’s calling rioters and looters “peaceful protesters” or donating money to pay their bail, the message they sent to the rioters was simple: You’re all good, we have your back.

This pro-political-violence attitude from Democrats precedes the BLM riots of 2020. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in 2019 that sometimes people have “no choice but to riot.” Nancy Pelosi literally called for violent uprisings against the Trump administration over child separation at the southern border. Countless liberals cheered when Madonna said at the Woman’s March in D.C. in 2016 that she thought about “blowing up the White House.”

The Democrats’ hatred of President Trump was so strong they literally they’ve romanticized and normalized political violence. They brought our country to this point, not Trump.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/01/08/remember-when-the-left-love-rioters-and-kamala-harris-promoted-a-group-that-bailed-them-out-of-jail-n1310487?utm_source=pjmedia&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=&bcid=333548a2571394d78f5984884e55069e&recip=28668535