Thursday, July 23, 2026

How China Made and Shipped Fake Driver’s Licenses to Tamper With the 2020 Election

How China Made and Shipped Fake Driver’s Licenses to Tamper With the 2020 Election

AP Photo/Chris Carlson, File

When President Donald Trump talked about some of the things China has done to literally steal our democracy by seeing to it that, in 2020, its Manchurian candidate was elected in the form of a semi-comatose Joe Biden, many of the things he mentioned had already been in the news, but they may not have been covered by the legacy media.

Case in point: Trump mentioned in his July 16 address to the nation that China stole TikTok data to create fake U.S. driver’s licenses.

If you follow conservative media, you may have known this. If you get your news from the legacy media, you most likely didn’t know it, and if you heard it now, you won’t believe it. That’s the group Trump was targeting in his address. His national address strategy was to speak past the legacy media and to begin the process of planting the seeds of the truth in the minds of those who rely on the CNNs, ABCs, and NBCs of the world.

Strategically, Trump is now trying to break through the information barrier that the legacy media and the left have created to keep the majority of Americans in the dark on what’s really happened to corrupt our elections.

A year ago, Brooke Singman published a lengthy piece on the Fox News website that detailed just how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) executed its TikTok data theft scheme. Her primary source for the story was the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is chaired by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).

The Senate Judiciary Committee launched its own investigation into this after the FBI had announced its own investigation in July 2025. As Singman reported, the CCP allegedly worked to get “fake driver's licenses to Chinese sympathizers in the U.S. who would cast a vote for candidate Biden.”

It is not clear how successful the CCP was in getting its ballots for Biden to count.

In July 2025, a Grassley spokesperson told Fox News, "Chairman Grassley is in receipt of an FBI document (response) to a request he made based on legally protected whistleblower disclosures…. The document alleges serious national security concerns that need to be fully investigated by the FBI.”

As stated in that document, the intent of the alleged scheme was for the People's Republic of China (PRC) to produce and export fraudulent U.S. driver’s licenses to Chinese sympathizers in the U.S., so as to create “tens of thousands of fraudulent mail-in votes for US Presidential candidate Joe Biden, in late August 2020.”

According to the document at the center of these investigations, by August 2020, “the Chinese government had produced a large amount of fraudulent United States driver’s licenses that were secretly exported to the United States,” Fox News reported.

The fraudulent drivers licenses would allow tens of thousands of Chinese students and immigrants sympathetic to the Chinese Communist Party to vote for US Presidential Candidate USPER Joe ((Biden)), despite not being eligible to vote in the United States... China had collected private US user data from millions of TikTok accounts, to include name, ID and address, which would allow the Chinese government to use real US persons’ information to create the fraudulent driver’s license, the document states.

Reporting on the investigation indicates that the fake IDs included true ID numbers and the true addresses of U.S. citizens, which made the fraud difficult to detect.

"China planned to use the fraudulent driver’s licenses to account for tens of thousands of mail-in votes,” according to the document.

What’s not clear is how specifically the PRC accessed the TikTok data and got all the information it needed to create those fake driver’s licenses. TikTok, for example, does not require a physical address when users register for an account.

Did the creators of the fake IDs use the physical addresses of those Chinese sympathizers? This is fuzzy.

FBI Director Kash Patel and Grassley had been working closely on this case prior to the president’s speech on July 16.

Related: Did Former FBI Agent Nikki Floris Run a ‘Shadow Government' During the 2020 Election? 

In another uncanny development from around the same time, in July 2020, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents at the International Mail Facility (IMF) at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport announced that in the first half of that year, they had seized 1,513 shipments of fraudulent documents, which included 19,888 fake U.S. driver’s licenses. Most of those shipments originated in China and Hong Kong, as well as Great Britain and South Korea.

According to the CBP statement on the matter from 2020, “The driver’s licenses were for various people in different states with a vast majority destined for neighboring states. Most were for college-age students, and other licenses would share the same picture but have different biographical data. Another concern was the bar code attached to the Michigan licenses worked.”

In typical fashion, the Democrats’ propaganda machine known as the Associated Press reported at the time, “There is no evidence to suggest they were linked to voter fraud.” Case closed, I guess.

Maybe leftist newswire Reuters had a different take: “Facebook posts shared thousands of times claim that 19,888 fake driver’s licenses were seized at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport after being ordered by people ‘all registered to vote, all Democrats.’ Suggesting that the licenses were part of a voter fraud conspiracy, this claim is partly false. While it is true that U.S. Customs and Border Protection seized 19,888 counterfeit licenses at O’Hare in late July, they had no apparent connection to Democratic Party registration or the upcoming election.”

So, you can see that in just two instances, the AP and Reuters, they were singing from the same song sheet. "Nothing to see here in the weeks before a presidential election. Keep moving."

Let’s try one more news site just to be fair. Were they all saying the exact same thing to the benefit of the Democrats and Biden in the weeks before the election?

“There’s no hint of any connection between the confiscated fake IDs and Democrats or voter fraud,” wrote the Chicago Sun-Times at the time.

No need to keep looking. The left’s damage control rapid response team made darn sure this story was snuffed out before it became national news and threatened Biden’s chances.

At the end of the day, China will be China. You should expect our adversaries to try to tamper with our elections. Interestingly, they all wanted Biden, and all they got Biden, and so did the legacy media.

What’s most troublesome is how the media so actively sought to kill any curiosity over those fake driver’s licenses from China, even though it was aware of the matter well before election day.

Of course, that pattern has continued. Even with active Senate and FBI investigations since July 2025, you’re more likely to see news of the Taylor Swift-Jason Kelce wedding than you are to see news of how your TikTok data could have been stolen and used by China to try to manipulate an American election.

This is not a bug; it’s a feature of the system. That’s what the Trump administration is up against, and it’s why he’s now taking his case directly to the American people.

You’re going to hear a lot more about this and other election integrity developments in the coming months directly from Trump and his people. If you’re an avid consumer of conservative media, most of this may not be new to you. But you must know that you are not the audience. It’s your cousin, or your aunt, or your coworker who doesn’t start thinking about an upcoming election until the final weeks before voting. It’s the people who still don’t want to believe that their elections may have been corrupted. That’s who the president is trying to reach.

https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/07/20/how-china-made-and-shipped-fake-drivers-licenses-to-tamper-with-the-2020-election-n4955252?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Pass the Prilosec — Kamala Harris Is Getting Mentioned a Lot

Pass the Prilosec — Kamala Harris Is Getting Mentioned a Lot

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Top O' the Briefing

Happy Tuesday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Please leave your suggestions for the koi pond repurposing with Margarethe in Men's Fragrances. 

The world that the Democrats occupy is different than anything I've experienced here in reality, and I'm sure all of you feel the same. It often seems as if I am staring into a giant aquarium of dysfunctionality, looking at an environment in which I know I couldn't survive, even if I wanted to, which I don't. 

Watching the Dems' abject mediocrities repeatedly fail upward never fails to perplex me, even though I've been seeing it for decades. We don't have any experience with that kind of backwards lunacy on our side of the aisle, so it will always be weird. 

Former Vice President Kamala Harris is the most notable example of this in the Democratic Party. After being so unpopular in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary season that she was out of the race in 2019, she ended up being offered the Number Two spot on the ticket. That, of course, happened because the Democrats prioritze pandering and diversity above all else. 

Which is why, despite her spectacular defeat as the 2024 anointee, Princess Cackles is still hanging around. 

Harris was unable to get any traction whatsoever in the California gubernatorial race, which she took as a sign that she should run for president again. The delusion is strong with this one. Sure, that can be said about any Democrat these days, but ex-Madame Veep really stands out in this regard. 

We have discussed this a few times in recent months. It's been pretty obvious that she's gunning for another run in 2028, but, up to this point, it has seemed as if the only interest in her doing so was confined to her fever dream. That seems to be changing a bit. 

This was shared in a post by my Twitchy colleague justmindy:

After the contortions that the Democrats' money people and their flying monkeys in the mainstream media put themselves through in order to attempt to drag Harris across the finish line in 2024, they can probably fall back into line for her in a hurry. 

The Democratic Party is in such disarray right now that they are looking at options for the next presidential race that are all equally awful. That obviously works in Harris's favor. The same thing that thrust her into prominence in 2020 is her biggest advantage. This is from a column that Daniel McCarthy wrote for us yesterday:

Harris checks the identity-politics boxes that may be as important as winning to Democratic primary voters: Their ticket must have a woman, and it can't be all white.

Bingo. 

There is still a lot of chatter about California Governor Gavin Newsom, but I've said for years that he's a bit too white for the Democratic panderfest. Also, as we have seen so often, the Democrats have a penchant for doubling-down on their bad ideas, and Harris is certainly one of their worst. 

It's important to remember that the Democrats feel that their diversity shtick entitles them to things, like the presidency. They don't really care about minorities, as we know, they see them as reliable voting blocs and virtue-signaling currency. They no doubt feel that Kamala Harris is owed some quality time in the White House. 

And, as Daniel notes in his column, Harris could end up being the least commie option for the Dems, should they choose to back away from that.

I don't think that they want to be any less commie now that it's all out in the open. If they choose not to do a head-fake away from the precipitous left, look for the principle-free Harris to lean into the Fidel Castro ideals of the Democratic Socialists. 

Kamala Harris isn't going anywhere, we know that now. She's also not going to beat JD Vance or Marco Rubio in a presidential election.

So there's that. 

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/07/20/the-morning-briefing-pass-the-prilosec-kamala-harris-is-getting-mentioned-a-lot-n4955263/?utm_campaign=nl_pm&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjmediambvip

State Dept: Code Pink, DSA, People's Forum Among Groups in Cuba-Linked Rapid Response Network

State Dept: Code Pink, DSA, People's Forum Among Groups in Cuba-Linked Rapid Response Network

AP Photo/Ramon Espinosa

The political left loves to protest. They seem to do a lot more protesting than people on the right do; people on the right, after all, have jobs. Now, though, we may see another round of protests and potentially riots, as Cuba is reportedly organizing far-left American activist groups to target American military bases, ICE facilities and other federal installations if there is any overt American action against Cuba.

A new State Department report argues that Cuba has cultivated a network of American activist organizations that can be mobilized against U.S. policy, citing a publicly posted plan for protests at U.S. military bases, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities and federal buildings as a recent example.

The June "National Rapid Response Plan" was distributed by the National Network on Cuba, a U.S. coalition of more than 60 organizations. The State Department links the coalition to the Cuban government through its relationship with the Cuban Institute of Friendship with the Peoples, or ICAP, a government entity sanctioned in June for allegedly supporting Cuban intelligence activities.

The plan calls for "coordinated nationwide actions" within 24 hours of a U.S. military attack — or the "imminent threat" of one — and says its goal is to make it "politically and materially costly for the U.S. government to wage war on Cuba."

The State Department report, which you can view here, states in part (emphasis added):

In June 2026, NNOC began distributing a “National Rapid Response Plan” outlining a detailed strategy for activating and launching “coordinated nationwide actions” against federal institutions, U.S. military bases, and ICE detention centers and field offices in the United States within 24 hours of U.S. military action (or the imminent threat of it) against Cuba. The plan, which purports to be a blueprint to “make it politically and materially costly for the U.S. government to wage war on Cuba,” meticulously details specific activation triggers, target categories and priorities, tiered action strategies – with guidance tailored to geography and population density – and operational timeline for coordinating actions across its nationwide network, establishing different action timetables depending on when the trigger occurs so as to achieve “rapid mobilization…across timezones.” 

The document is explicit about the Cuban network’s kinship with domestic left-wing causes, instructing activists to target ICE detention centers and field offices in a strategic effort to link “Cuba solidarity to anti-ICE/immigrant defense work happening nationwide.” (In addition to the three priority target categories – federal buildings, U.S. military bases and recruitment offices, and ICE facilities – “sports arenas during high-visibility events” are offered as a fourth “optional target”). 

The groups Cuba has reportedly approached include Code Pink, the People's Forum, the Democratic Socialists of America, and the Communist Party USA. This is quite a laundry list of American far-left groups.


Read More: Jeb Bush Now Sounding Alarms on Cuba Drone Menace

How's Communism Work? Like This: Cuba Goes Dark As Island Nation Hit With Massive Blackout


This "National Rapid Response Plan" includes some alarming specifics, and specifies a 24-hour response time in the event any action is taken by the United States against Cuba. This presumably means any military action, but might also apply to a blockade or any similar economic sanction. In major cities, this could include mass protests against any federal installation, including but probably not limited to courthouses, military bases, and ICE/Border Patrol installations.

What's really concerning about this is the potential for things to get out of control, and fast. Protests from the far-left have the distinct tendency to become violent, and with this plan, these Cuban proxies are planning to mobilize thousands of unhinged far-left nuts to flood the areas around any federal installations. We're already seeing this with the attempts to interfere with ICE agents in the performance of their duties; this Cuban plan could take that up an order of magnitude.

There are, at present, no indications that the Trump administration is planning any military action against Cuba. It probably won't be necessary. Cuba seems to be collapsing quite well all on its own. But this is another indication of a disturbing trend in American politics, that being that the far-left is increasingly willing to resort to violence. What the far-left doesn't understand is that, in the end, it won't work out at all like they think it will.

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2026/07/20/cuba-linked-activists-now-planning-protests-at-us-bases-ice-sites-n2204537?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Here's How the Democrats Are Blowing the Midterms

Here's How the Democrats Are Blowing the Midterms

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

It can’t be said enough that history is on the Democrats’ side, but they seem determined to blow it. Precedent alone should hand Democrats a comfortable advantage this year.

Only three midterms in nearly a century broke the pattern.

In 2002, George W. Bush's Republicans held their ground just over a year after the 9/11 attacks, when national security dominated everything else. In 1998, Bill Clinton's Democrats benefited when Republicans overplayed their hand chasing impeachment over the Monica Lewinsky scandal. In 1934, Franklin Roosevelt's Democrats rode the enduring popularity of the New Deal through the depths of the Great Depression. Each exception had a distinct, extraordinary set of circumstances behind it.

On the surface, it looks like Democrats should be able to win easily. Aside from precedent, Donald Trump's polling gives them even more room to work with. Yet recent surveys suggest Democrats are underperforming badly enough that the wave they were counting on might not materialize.

That underperformance could cost them control of the House.

If Republicans hold the House this November, the reasons will be obvious: a socialist insurgency reshaping the party from within, and a singular obsession with opposing Trump that has crowded out everything else voters actually care about.

The evidence is already sitting in the polling.

On the generic congressional ballot, Republicans are either tied with Democrats or ahead by three to four points, nowhere near the margin Democrats need to flip the House. A recent Washington Post/Ipsos poll put Democrats up just 48% to 45% on that same generic ballot question. Asked which party they agree with more on the issues that matter to them, voters split 41% Republican to 40% Democrat. Asked which party they trust more to handle the economy, the gap widened: 39% for Republicans to 35% for Democrats.

ICYMI: Democrats Don't Want You to See This Video of Biden on Election Interference

Analysts at The Wall Street Journal have said a Democratic edge of anything under four points on election night is good news for Republicans trying to hold the majority. Right now, Democrats aren't clearing that bar.

Here's the part that should really worry them. Trump's disapproval rating among Democrats is far lower than it was during his first term. In 2018, 90% of Democrats disapproved of him. In 2026, that number sits at 69%. Despite those low approval numbers, most surveys still don't show Democrats building a clear advantage in the races that will actually decide who controls the House.

Democrats have assumed that being anti-Trump is enough. But the fact is, they aren’t giving voters a reason to vote Democrat, and the party's growing tolerance for socialism isn’t helping them. Socialism remains deeply unpopular with the broader electorate, and its visible presence inside the Democrat Party is giving persuadable voters a reason to back Republicans they might not have otherwise supported.

Every historical tailwind is blowing in Democrats' direction this year, and still, Democrats may fail to capitalize on any of it. Make no mistake about it, if they blow this midterm, they won't be able to blame the map, the money, or the message alone. They will have blown the most favorable set of conditions a minority party could ask for, and they will have done it to themselves.

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/07/20/heres-how-the-democrats-are-blowing-the-midterms-n4955245

Trump's Obsession With Election Integrity Will Save the Republic

Trump's Obsession With Election Integrity Will Save the Republic

AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

Top O' the Briefing

Happy Monday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Reirkrebbdo was having surprising luck getting people to try Full Contact Lederhosen YAHTZEE!

Most of the "Top 'O the Briefing" for Friday morning had already been written last Thursday night by the time President Donald Trump was finished with his speech, which is why I didn't comment on it. Regulars here in Briefingland know that I don't think that we can talk about election integrity too much, especially in this most critical election year. 

While Senate Jellyfish Majority Leader John Thune keeps riding the Useless Wuss train rather than pass the SAVE America Act, President Trump is making sure that discussions regarding shoring up our vulnerable election processes stay front and center. 

That tenacity is precisely what I voted for. 

The Democrats' assault on fair and free elections is relentless and fierce. It's the only thing beyond their hatred for President Trump that they focus on. If their claims about fraud being almost nonexistent were true, they wouldn't bristle so much whenever we mention even looking into it. Innocent people aren't that edgy all the time. 

The current drama shows the Democrats at their hypocritical worst. Unable to admit that they lost the 2016 presidential election because Trump ran a better campaign and Hillary Clinton is the least likable human being on the planet Earth, they wholeheartedly spun and embraced a false narrative about foreign interference. It was, as far as this Cold War kid can remember, the first time that the Democrats said anything negative about Russia. 

Now that there is evidence of actual foreign tampering in an American election, the Democrats would have their low-info base believe that the very notion is preposterous. A lot of that has to do with the fact that the Democrats are reluctant to cast aspersions on their ChiCom buddies. 

Catherine wrote a post that chronicled some of the Dem hysteria after the president's speech, including a bit of insanity from pathological election denier and fake Governor of Georgia Stacey Abrams. Again, they're a jittery lot for people who have nothing to hide. 

A recent circuit court ruling was a bright spot in the ongoing fight; Catherine also covered that:

The court granted the motion for stay in the case of the NAACP v. USPS, based on the strength of the appellants' arguments. In other words, the court agreed that USPS is likely to win its case based on the Constitution and on the timeframe which the Postal Service has to implement a framework for ballots ahead of the midterm elections.

Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney for the central district of California, posted, “This ruling is a win for election integrity and would have significant implications for states like California that refuse to submit their voter rolls to verify compliance with federal election laws.”

As Catherine goes on to explain, the USPS is trying to ensure a tighter chain of custody for the mail-in ballots. I'll take the win, but I still think that the only way to make vote-by-mail more secure is to make it so restrictive that even people on our side of the aisle would complain about it. 

Baby steps. 

It's true that President Trump is surrounded by people who are helping him in this never-ending battle, but it's only a fight because he's making it one. I didn't say "might" save the Republic in the headline because I do think that Trump will keep at it until things are much better. If elections were poker games, I was all-in in November of 2024 and hit the jackpot. It's a comfort knowing that he won't let this go. 

Now if he could just get that low-T weakling Thune to man up. 

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/07/20/the-morning-briefing-trumps-obsession-with-election-integrity-will-save-the-republic-n4955224/?utm_campaign=nl_pm&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjmediambvip

About Those Burn Bags President Trump Mentioned in His Address to the Nation

About Those Burn Bags President Trump Mentioned in His Address to the Nation

AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

In addition to its general corruptibility, one thing you can be sure of when it comes to the federal government is that it’s probably not a good idea to trust federal employees to conceal your misdeeds. In the bureaucracy, "good enough" is the standard for quality work

And so, when President Donald Trump delivered his address to the nation on July 16, he brought attention to something we should know much more about but don’t yet: the discovery of “burn bags,” which Trump said contained sensitive documents from the Obama administration.

Trump said, “Recently, we found significant numbers of burn bags... and this is a group of bags that were used to destroy information given by President Barack Hussein Obama to be burned....These bags were supposed to be at a different level, by different people, incinerated...but it never happened. Maybe we got lucky.”

As the term implies, burn bags contain material that is slated for destruction, sending all of the former administration’s secrets into that big shredder in the sky. But someone “dropped the bag,” and more than a few of them were left to be discovered by the second Trump administration in the FBI building.

Now that Trump is sitting on a political treasure trove of data and information that can be used to expose the left, expect a distraction or two. Whenever the left panics, you start to see ginned-up controversies over allegations of Trump "stealing our democracy," "climate change," "Christian nationalism," or all of the above.

Given the seriousness of the potential contents of those burn bags, it wouldn’t surprise me if the left goes even harder with its lies and wrap-up smears to try to take Trump out using the 25th Amendment to the Constitution.

As a result of the Trump administration’s discovery of those burn bags, the president ordered the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the CIA to review the documents, analyze them, and see if any laws were broken. That analysis will focus on the handling of the sensitive information and the chain of custody of the documents themselves, and the contents of the documents that were never destroyed.

It must be noted that simply finding some old burn bags doesn't mean something improper was done. The federal government uses burn bags as a matter of course to destroy sensitive materials that will no longer be kept on file.

The president believes that the bags of documents could unearth critical information that has been concealed from the public eye. He bases this viewpoint on his past experience with both the Obama and Biden administrations and their pattern of not preserving, or not providing access to, certain important intelligence information.

In other words, Trump knows what he doesn’t know, and he wants answers. Could those bags contain more proof of the deep state covering up election schemes? Do any contain information that implicates specific members of the Obama or Biden administrations?

If Trump knows, he’s not naming names or providing details just yet.

Trump’s mention of those burn bags was in the context of his larger address on election integrity failures and questionable activities on the part of Democrat administrations, their political operatives, and others. As leftists circle the wagons to protect their favorite former Democrat presidents and their people, leftist central messaging is already testing the following key messages:

  • "Alleging foreign interference in an election is not proof (evidence) that a foreign government successfully controlled the outcome." This is like saying, “Sure he had a gun and shot at ya, but he missed ya, so he didn’t do anything wrong.”
  • "Criminal charges require more than political accusations." Of course, this is true, but where do criminal charges themselves come from? They come from accusations that can be supported by evidence.
  • "Even if you find some incriminating information in those burn bags, you’re going to need to prove that the person implicated knowingly violated federal law." Depending on the situation, that would be a matter for the courts to decide, but this key message gets at understanding and intent, which in a PR sense can be a straw man. For example, it doesn’t matter whether you intended to kill someone with your car; if you ran over them, intentionally or not, you likely broke a law or two. In other words, “I did not know there was a law against this” is no excuse.
  • "The discovery of documents alone would not establish a criminal conspiracy." Another straw man. No one is saying “discovery of documents” is all you need. If the documents contain words and sentences that do establish a criminal conspiracy, someone’s goose may be cooked.
  • "As for China, investigators must have direct evidence of coordination, communication, or actions that link actual people to the effort to tamper with an election." Once again, this is just a description of the legal and justice process. All of this is true, but stating it does not get anyone off the hook.

Back in 2020 and 2021, when Trump sought to use the court system to contest the manner in which the 2020 election was conducted, he literally had no time left in his term to go the legal route as president. By the time the courts would consider some of his claims, he was essentially an outsider without access to much of the information that he now has.

After election day in 2020, Trump was shut out of the system long enough to ensure that he would live the rest of his life in political exile after one term in office. But in 2024, Trump shocked the world and won.

His administration now has access to what it needs to better determine what happened in 2020, to address it, and, hopefully, to tap the justice system to ensure such corruption never happens again.

https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/07/19/about-those-burn-bags-president-trump-mentioned-in-his-address-to-the-nation-n4955234?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

This Law Means That Praying at a Northern Ireland Hospital Could Land You in Trouble With the Police

This Law Means That Praying at a Northern Ireland Hospital Could Land You in Trouble With the Police
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

A new statement released by authorities in the United Kingdom could mean that individuals who bring a Bible into a hospital could face punishment for violating an “abortion safe access zone.”

The updated guidelines released by the Police Service of Northern Ireland were in response to questions generated by the Abortion Services Act of 2023 in Northern Ireland, according to Fox News.

The PSNI clarified that an offense against the legislation would be for “anyone who is not one of those protected persons to behave within a Safe Access Zone in a way that influences, prevents access for, or causes harassment, alarm or distress to a person attending for abortion services – whether directly or indirectly.”

“Critically a person does not have to intend to commit an offence,” the PSNI continued. “Under the act, it is sufficient that a person was reckless as to whether their behaviour had one of those effects. This means that a person cannot avoid liability simply by claiming they did not mean to influence or distress anyone.”

The PSNI further explained that the lawfulness of prayer, Scripture readings, the carrying of a Bible or other religious materials, pastoral ministry, and even “visible religious practice” that could “directly or indirectly influence a person” seeking an abortion would constitute an offense under Northern Ireland law.

No exemptions are made for those who serve in a religious or ministerial capacity. One retired pastor has already been convicted and fined for “preaching a Gospel sermon near a hospital” in 2024, with courts demanding that he pay $614 in May.

The updated regulations against the practice of faith come as censorship levels in the U.K. escalate to unprecedented heights.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/josephchalfant/2026/07/19/this-law-means-that-praying-at-a-northern-ireland-hospital-could-land-you-in-trouble-with-the-police-n2679713?utm_source=thdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Watch: Show Host Wrecks NYC DSA Co-Chair Over Radical Goals in Brutal Interview

Watch: Show Host Wrecks NYC DSA Co-Chair Over Radical Goals in Brutal Interview

AP Photo/Jon Cherry

The new platform of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) got a lot of attention this week.

The revision to the DSA platform, "Workers Deserve More," plans to abolish the Senate entirely and replace the president and Supreme Court with an executive branch and judiciary elected by and subordinate to Congress. 

They also want to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), defund the Department of War, end deportations, ease restrictions on immigration control for migration between countries, and "extend full voting rights to people with criminal convictions and noncitizens."

We covered what the DSA national co-chair said about abolishing the Senate. 


READ MORE: Yikes: DSA Co-Chair Just Made a Big Admission About One of Their Goals to Change Our Government


Now, Fox's Martha MacCallum has interviewed the New York City DSA co-chair Gustavo Gordillo. She does a great job asking questions that expose the problems with the organization's positions. Gordillo also didn't do a very good job in response. 

Here, he attacks the Senate as an "undemocratic institution," and MacCallum has to explain to him that's by the design of the Constitution. 

Gordillo argued that when you ask people if the system is working for them, most people are unhappy. That could be, but if you also asked them if they would scrap the system and replace it with socialism or Communism, they would tell you how great this system is in comparison. 

They want to get rid of the Senate to make things more "democratic" and expand the House. That's expressly contradictory to the Constitution and the Founders' intent, which was to specifically reject a pure democracy and mob rule. 

Gordillo spoke about how they pushed for freezing the rent in NYC. He claimed no landlord "had a Constitutional right" to a double-digit return on his investment. 

So they will freeze the rent, which will lead to more landlords being unable to maintain the building, which will then adversely affect the tenants with things that can't be repaired, and have fewer available apartments. 

MacCallum asked a great question that called out this whole sham basis for socialism and Communism: how does the government become more democratized, if the government takes over more of the power [from the people]? It's out and out contradictory. She pointed out how the one government-run grocery store they're going to have in NYC costs $30 million in taxpayer dollars, is going to put competitive pressure on the bodegas in the neighborhood - you know, the working people that the DSA claims they care about, who are by no means billionaires. His answer is incredible. 

He said they were about having a government that "works for ordinary people." 

"If one publicly owned grocery store that brings prices down in the neighborhood is enough to put someone out of business, then maybe they shouldn't have been in that business in the first place."

"Interesting," MacCallum replies, almost not believing how much he is cooking himself and the DSA. 

So much for caring about those "working people" bodega owners. How then is the government any different than a billionaire business in this analogy? That bodega owner and his customers are just going to get stomped on by the government, which is using their tax dollars to do it. 

The funniest part of the interview was when she nailed him on why people leave other countries to come to the U.S.  They talked about his parents leaving Peru during the time of the Maoist Shining Path group, and coming here. "So why did your family come to America?" she asked. 

“The economic situation in South America and Peru was in a really bad place… much of what we could say was responsible for that actually was the imposition of capitalism and American imperialism. In many cases, it is actually what brings immigrants to the U.S., coming out of Latin America.”  

Of course, that's nonsensical. They're largely fleeing because of Communism and autocratic rulers who don't allow them to thrive as they can here. 

Martha MacCallum wasn't letting his answer go, “So, they come here because they don’t like the imposition of American imperialism in the country that they’re in?” 

Gordillo said yes.

MacCallum finished him, “That doesn’t make much sense.”

Exactly, very well done. 

Democrats have largely welcomed these extremists who will eat them alive.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2026/07/18/nyc-dsa-co-chair-remarks-on-fox-n2204475?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl