Thursday, November 12, 2026

DHS Secretary Says He’s Open to Deal That Includes DACA Permanent Legal Status, But Not Amnesty

DHS Secretary Says He’s Open to Deal That Includes DACA Permanent Legal Status, But Not Amnesty

DHS Secretary Says He’s Open to Deal That Includes DACA Permanent Legal Status, But Not Amnesty
AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

After suffering a devastating election loss last Tuesday, the last thing conservatives needed was to tune into 60 Minutes and hear President Donald Trump, who was elected on the promise of mass deportations, tell Ross Douthat that, in retrospect, maybe his deportation policy was "too tough."

Rapid Response 47 got into it with The Blaze, which used the word "amnesty," and got a Community Note for its efforts.

Readers added context they thought people might want to know

“But people who are here, and in some cases here for 10 or 15 years, work a deal for them.”

That’s the same thing as amnesty.

Politico's Sophia Cai says that she talked to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin on Monday morning, who "draws a red line on amnesty" but says he's open to an immigration deal that includes permanent legal status for DACA recipients.

The post continues:

… ‘let’s start working with them and then let’s meet at some point.’” W/ @MyahWard

Better yet, let's ramp up deportations for the two years we have left and not meet at some middle point.

Again, we're still licking our wounds from less than a week ago. We don't need this.

https://twitchy.com/brettt/2026/11/09/dhs-secretary-says-hes-open-to-deal-the-includes-daca-permanent-legal-status-n2434254?utm_source=twdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Republicans Keep Screaming 'Socialism.' Ron DeSantis Says That's Not Going to Cut It.

Republicans Keep Screaming 'Socialism.' Ron DeSantis Says That's Not Going to Cut It.

Republicans Keep Screaming 'Socialism.' Ron DeSantis Says That's Not Going to Cut It.
AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall

Screaming “socialism” is no longer an effective strategy, and it’s well past time Republicans recognized that.

As the Democratic Socialists of America have continued to consolidate power and progressive Democrat candidates have continued to win elections, Republicans have increasingly treated calling them socialists, or communists, as an effective strategy for opposing their economic policies. But last Tuesday’s results, like Zohran Mamdani’s victory in New York City a year ago, exposed the limits of that tactic. It did not work a year ago, and it did not work last week. The labels alone simply don’t work.

Over the weekend, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis explained why. First, young people like socialism. They support it, and they vote for it. Sure, you can blame education, but that’s an incomplete answer. According to DeSantis, young people are turning to socialism because they haven’t been offered a real alternative. On one side, they see socialists promising to help them. On the other, they see people who claim to defend the free market engaging in corporate favoritism, or “crony capitalism," a term that has become synonymous with genuine free markets. 

"I think a big part of [why socialism has grown in popularity] is, what they're comparing is not free enterprise to socialism," the Florida governor said.

"What they're comparing is how government gets involved in business and you have crony capitalism. So the best kind of indirect supporters of socialism are some of these corporatist Republicans who propagate these crony policies, because the average person seeing that and say, wait a minute, you're trying to bend the government to funnel benefits to this corporation or that industry or this. What about having a competitive market?"

"If you have a competitive market and you truly have free enterprise, that's gonna benefit small businesses, it's gonna benefit individuals, you are gonna see the standard of living rise," DeSantis added.

But what young people are seeing instead, he argued, is more corporate cronyism. DeSantis pointed in particular to what he called a “10-year effective amnesty” that would prevent state and local governments from regulating AI data centers. While that specific example can be disputed, the broader point holds. 

For decades, Republican economic policy has amounted to corporate favoritism, closer in kind to the corruption of communist countries than anything resembling a free market. Recent policy offers more of the same. Tariffs, for example, whatever their merits, allow domestic companies to charge more without lowering costs or becoming more competitive. That is a form of cronyism. So are corporate bailouts and federal ownership stakes in private companies. Ask yourself: when was the last time a conservative at the federal level built an economic agenda around encouraging competition, aggressively deregulating, or cutting federal subsidies?

We don’t hear those ideas championed often enough, or on a large enough scale, to call them the Republican Party’s economic agenda. As a result, not only has socialism continued to grow in popularity, but you’re even more likely to hear a young Republican defend government intervention than make the case for free markets.

This has been one of the greatest failures of Republican policymaking over the last quarter-century: we have championed a system we have refused to put into practice. The rise of socialism, on both the Left and the Right, is the price we now pay.

From Concentration Camps to Guillotines: The Left’s Revenge Wish

From Concentration Camps to Guillotines: The Left’s Revenge Wish

From Concentration Camps to Guillotines: The Left’s Revenge Wish
AP Photo/Eric Thayer

As the old song goes, the times, they are a-changing. We saw that with alarming clarity only last week, when Republicans and the conservative movement — let's not harbor any illusions about this — were handed a serious setback. We may be several cycles recovering, and Democrats and the rest of the far left will do everything they can to ensure we never do. Furthermore, some recent reporting, some recent statements by the Left, from politicians and activists, are making it pretty plain that they will do anything necessary to keep the control they have gained.

And, yes, some of them are just plain calling for revenge. Well, that generally doesn't end well; there's another old saying that goes, "When you set out for revenge, first, dig two graves."

But many on the left sure seem determined to have that revenge, as noted in a recent Issues & Insights editorial.

A September poll asked 683 Democratic voters how they would feel if they “woke up tomorrow morning and saw the following news headlines.” The Center for Strategic Politics found that nearly nine in 10 (86%) said they would have a positive feeling if the headlines told them “President Donald Trump has been impeached and convicted by both houses of Congress and has been removed from office.”

Not surprising, yet still somewhat chilling.

But things get worse.

Fifty-six percent said they’d be happy learning that Trump had died overnight in his sleep, while 84% would be pleased if the 25th Amendment had been used to declare Trump “unfit by a majority of his Cabinet and removed from office.” Almost 60% would be delighted if a military coup had ousted Trump.

That's inhuman. And, that's the Left today. A recent piece at American Greatness illustrates just who these people are with amusing clarity. It's the first of the three waves of leftist thought that is the most hateful in their actions and rhetoric.

One was the loosely knit but ideologically uniform cadre of protesters, pussy-hat-wearing performance artists, Pecksniffian professors,  professional outrage emitters for hire, and sad females of both genders who regularly congregate outside the White House and other public venues with signs protesting this week’s trumped-up Trumpian tort. They formed a sort of background obligato, slightly hysterical, utterly unquestioning, unremittingly accusatory. They thought themselves repositories of every virtuous sentiment while Donald Trump and all his works were anathema. Doubtless there are pages in some textbooks on abnormal psychology devoted to such unprepossessing creatures.

These are the people we should look at with caution. They toil not, neither do they spin, but they seem all too willing to abandon the civil standards of Western civilization. Historically, that kind of thing, these kinds of civil revolts, tend to end up badly for the revolutionaries; they are useful foot soldiers, but that's all they are. These are the people who are willing to throw bottles filled with urine at cops, but the history of communist and socialist revolutions shows brilliantly that, while the useful idiots seem always to think they will be the ones walking around with clipboards, deciding which dissidents go to which re-education camp or gulag, they are more likely to end up purged as known troublemakers.

Still, there's an opportunity in all this for Republicans and conservatives; and yes, there's a Venn diagram there that overlaps a lot but not completely. We shouldn't ignore this kind of rhetoric from the Left. We shouldn't ignore the shouting useful idiots, the vicious little black-bloc-wearing goblins who are rioting in the streets, or the unhinged statements of leftist activists and leftist politicians. No, these statements, these acts, should be shouted from the rooftops. Most Americans don't want political violence. Most Americans aren't bent on revenge against political opponents, by anyone. Most Americans will recoil in horror against the notion of a violent backlash following what was supposed to be a peaceful transfer of power. 

And no, that's not what happened on January 6, 2021. What that was, was at best hooliganism, but the government's reaction to those acts far outstripped the levels of any sane response.

Our republic almost certainly faces some serious problems ahead. But in the long run, I think that conservative thought and conservative policies will win through. It may be after some considerable conflict; it may be after some downright violence. But in the end, I think we'll win through. Why? Why would I think that?

Well, here's why and I'm going to tell you: It's because we're the people who make things work. We're the people who make things, who fix things, who carry on commerce. We're the ones who innovate, who create, who build wealth by creating things, not by looting or mooching. We're the ones who, in the end, make our economy and our civilization work. We're the ones who stand up and fight, when necessary, to protect that civilization, and our history also shows that we're pretty good at that. 

We, not they, are indispensable, if we want to keep our modern, technological lifestyle humming along. And that's the key point that the Left misses: 

They need us. We don't need them. 

The Left would do well to seriously contemplate the meaning of that. Because if it's violence they want, it's violence they'll get, and they are not going to come out on top.

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2026/11/09/from-concentration-camps-to-guillotines-the-lefts-revenge-wish-n2209204?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl