Wednesday, May 27, 2026

The RNC Just Scored a Major Election Security Victory in North Carolina

The RNC Just Scored a Major Election Security Victory in North Carolina

The RNC Just Scored a Major Election Security Victory in North Carolina
AP Photo/Charles Krupa

The Republican National Committee has scored a major victory in the state of North Carolina that requires election officials to purge voter rolls of any individual who does not have U.S. citizenship status, according to Fox News.

The judgement requires the North Carolina State Board of Elections to cross-reference jury duty records to identify registered voters who indicated that they do not have U.S. citizenship. Should authorities discover that individuals cast ballots while not having citizenship, they will be required to submit that information to the pertinent district attorney.

Democrats mounted a defense to oppose the move, with attorneys working with the Democrat-election giant Marc Elias pleaded with Superior Court Judge Jennifer Bedford against it. The decision was granted after a hearing that lasted just 19 minutes.

"This agreement is a major win for election integrity in North Carolina," RNC Chairman Joe Gruters told Fox News. "It’s straightforward: if someone admits they’re not a U.S. citizen during jury duty, that information should be used to check the voter rolls and remove anyone who doesn’t belong." 

The problems with North Carolinian voter rolls have become apparent over the past month, as over 34,000 deceased individuals were discovered to still be eligible to cast ballots.

The news comes as the election security SAVE Act has been sidelined in the Senate by Republicans who refuse to implement the talking filibuster to pass the wildly popular bill that Trump has considered a top priority.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/josephchalfant/2026/05/24/the-rnc-just-scored-a-major-election-security-victory-in-north-carolina-n2676600

Democrat Crimes Need to Be Prosecuted, Pronto!

Democrat Crimes Need to Be Prosecuted, Pronto!

Democrat Crimes Need to Be Prosecuted, Pronto!
AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File

James Comey, once again, is fittingly facing legal troubles, but at the moment, Letitia James is off the hook. She should not be celebrating, as, hopefully, the DOJ could keep filing charges – she is guilty on so many fronts.

For many on the Right, delays against people like Letitia James are all but expected. The anti-Trump cohorts have been above the law for far too long, stretching back for the past decade. September 2018, in particular, was a troublesome time, considering the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.

Two months after the hearings, in November 2018, an investigation by the Senate Judiciary Committee revealed that every single allegation made against Brett Kavanaugh, including those by star witness Christine Blasey Ford, lacked credibility and, largely, were demonstrably false. The Judiciary Committee offered the evidence in a 414-page report submitted to Congress. And presto! Nothing happened.

In early 2021, Senator Chuck Grassley, the former Senate Judiciary Committee chairperson who presided over the hearings, sought to know why those individuals who had perjured themselves still had not been prosecuted.

The Wheels of Justice, Stuck in the Mud

Grassley said the allegations against Justice Kavanaugh were bogus.

Today, nearly eight years after the Kavanaugh hearings, we all still would like to know why no prosecutions have occurred, amidst other compelling concerns.

The Russiagate criminals, also at the top of the heap, need to serve time in prison. Andrew McCabe, who was dismissed at the FBI for lack of candor and a bevy of other infractions, must come clean. James Clapper lied to Congress, and then lied about his lie, claiming that he was confused. He should be spending time in a federal penitentiary.

John Brennan knowingly conspired with Barack Obama and Joe Biden in the White House when he presented information showing that Hillary Clinton had purchased a phony dossier to employ to damage Donald Trump. Brennan, perhaps the greatest criminal director of the CIA, needs to spend time in prison.

Barack Obama, the kingpin of American political criminals, needs to spend time in prison. He completed his third term as president in January 2025, thanks to his ability to whip around Joe Biden. Obama's undermining of Trump before leaving office, his weaponization of federal agencies, and his years of serious treasonous activities to thwart the Trump Administration all require that he serve hard time in a federal penitentiary.

Of all the people populating the Obama Administration, Eric Holder, the first attorney general to be held in contempt of Congress and whose criminality in terms of allowing Black Panther intimidation in Philadelphia and a variety of other egregious acts, needs to be behind bars.

Lois Lerner at the IRS in 2012, who quashed the Tea Party movement by unlawfully using the power of her office to harass, intimidate, and thwart Tea Party members, needs to serve time. She's been on the public dole for the last 14 years, receiving a healthy pension and enjoying her retirement from ‘public service.'

Hillary Clinton, before Congress, must address the issue of the 31,830 subpoenaed emails that she deleted. Note: rank and file service men and women will spend six to 12 months in a federal penitentiary for deleting even one email.

All of Hillary Clinton's corrupt staff must face justice. John Podesta, whose crimes are well-documented, belongs in a federal penitentiary. Huma Abedin, whose obfuscation and manipulations for Hillary Clinton deserve scrutiny, must testify before Congress.

So Much More

All of the nefarious activities that went on to get Joe Biden ‘elected' and all of the criminals and treasonous individuals who participated in the fraud must be charged and tried, as must Hunter Biden and the entire Biden crime family.

As 2020 election-related crimes are more fully exposed, the clamor from the Right must necessarily be loud and long. Remember, the Left did everything in its power to indict those on the Right for the slightest of offenses, including process crimes, while wholesale ignoring its own treasonous activities.

The two-tiered justice system in our society must end, permanently, to preserve our representative republic. Until justice is dispensed equally under the law, regardless of party, the struggle before us remains abundantly clear.

https://townhall.com/columnists/jeffdavidson/2026/05/24/democrat-crimes-need-to-be-prosecuted-pronto-n2676582?utm_source=thdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Tuesday, May 26, 2026

'The Great Escape' and Islam

'The Great Escape' and Islam

AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana

In honor of Memorial Day, I convinced my teenage sons to watch the classic 1963 film, The Great Escape, starring Steve McQueen, James Garner, Richard Attenborough, Charles Bronson, and a slew of other stars of the time. A great movie, but watching it also pointed out some other sad and dangerous truths that we should remember not only on this Memorial Day as we remember America’s fallen soldiers, but at all times during the challenging days in which we live.

For those who are not aware of this film, it is based on the true story of a group of Allied escape artist–type prisoners of war who are all put in an “escape-proof” camp by the Germans. The camp, Stalag Luft III, is managed by the Luftwaffe (not the Gestapo or SS, but the German air force), and the prisoners, mostly British, were composed of Western Allied air personnel. The film details the prisoners’ attempt at the largest prisoner escape in history, striving to free 250 prisoners all at once. Ultimately, 76 escaped at one time, 73 were recaptured, and over 50 were executed. The first half of the film is a lot of fun and comedy, while the second half is thrilling and filled with action.

But watching it now in 2026, with the horrors of October 7 and the last 32 months of heinous crimes by Islamic forces and regimes vividly in my consciousness, I sadly saw the story in a very different light.

The movie shows a lot about the relationship between the Allied prisoners and their German captors. There is a mutual respect between them, as shown in the film. Officers from either side salute their enemy officers. Prisoners, although at times punished by being sent to “the cooler” (solitary confinement), are treated with the basic respect that should be given to any human being. They have bunks, showers, food, exercise, and all of the standards demanded by the Geneva Convention of 1929. Yes, they are in prison, but as codified in the Geneva Convention, they “may not be used as human shields,” “denied food as a punishment,” and “adequate clothing should be provided; and sanitary services in camps should be more than sufficient to prevent epidemics.” (It should be noted that while Israel signed the Geneva Conventions in 1949 and ratified them in 1951, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and numerous other Muslim states have still never adopted the Geneva Conventions.) All of this is shown in the film, which had technical advisors that included Wally Floody, an actual survivor of Stalag Luft III, and Donald Donald Pleasance, who was a member of the RAF and had spent time in a German POW camp.

In watching the film, it struck me how inaccurate it is to call Muslim terrorists “Islamo-Nazis.” These Islamic terrorists are much, much worse than the Nazis ever were. At the end of the day, the Germans and Allied Forces had more in common than it may seem. They all were from Judeo-Christian backgrounds, steeped in Christian values. Whether they believed and lived them or not, all of the participants on both sides had been ingrained with the higher ethical values found in the Bible: respect for humanity; a belief in a Supreme Being that manifests love; a love for life; and the values of the Ten Commandments. The participants on both sides of World War II treasured life over death and sought peace and prosperity, even if that still meant the Nazis targeted and murdered minorities such as Jews, Gypsies, and homosexuals.  Yes, a Nazi committed horrific evils and might want to kill a Jew, but he would not sacrifice his own life to do so.

The Muslims that we are all currently at war with both in the Middle East and domestically, with their attempts to conquer the country through creating Sharia law communities, have a value system that is both different and significantly more dangerous than anything the Nazis could conceive of.

Islam is based on the commands in the Quran that demand the creation of worldwide caliphate based on Sharia law. A martyr's death, which is antithetical to Nazi philosophy, is preferable in the Islamic world to allowing the “infidel” to live. Nazis did horrible things, including killing children. But they did not use children as human shields to defend themselves. While the Nazis performed some of the most horrific crimes in human history through their tortures and experimentations, very few of them actually took joy in the evil they performed. Some of them even recanted and showed remorse in later years. Conversely, Hamas demonstrated true evil as they performed the heinous crimes of October 7, celebrating the evil actions of rape, murder, torture, and more on innocent civilians. Hundreds of Hamas terrorists committed the evils, but all of Gaza, Iran, and pro-palestinians worldwide celebrated them.

Watching The Great Escape, I could not help but think of how the hostages were treated for over two years. The film accurately depicts the history of prisoners of war during World War II. They had food, sunlight, exercise, clothes, showers, and the basic needs of any human being, all of which were denied by Hamas.

Alan Dershowitz said that there is no such thing as pro-palestinian, only anti-Israel. Israel creates; “palestinians” only want to destroy. The Nazis, despite their evils, were part of Western Civilization, although manifestations of the darkest part. They committed horrible crimes, but they also shared the values of the West, even though they ignored those values so often. The Muslims, who in their minds have been fighting a 1400-year war to achieve world domination, have qualitatively different values and goals. They worship death over life and conquest over peace. The threat of “mutually assured destruction” is not a threat to them; it is a glorious and hoped for promise.

On this Memorial Day, as we remember all of the men and women who sacrificed their lives for the United States and for the preservation of Western Civilization, let us also remember the enemy that is at our doorstep. An enemy that is a death cult obsessed not with peace, but with domination.

And let us honor the ultimate sacrifice that so many men and women performed by exposing the evil that is even worse than the Nazis.

https://pjmedia.com/rabbi-michael-barclay/2026/05/25/the-great-escape-and-islam-n4953217?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Wokeness in higher education is still alive and kicking

Wokeness in higher education is still alive and kicking

Ballots went out last month for leadership positions at the American Sociological Association. Here’s some advice for candidates: Emphasize your Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion credentials. Among the past 13 ASA presidents, 11 were women, and 2 were black men.

Among the past 11 vice presidents, 10 were women. One was a white man. In addition, the criteria the ASA outlines for all of its awards make clear that “wokeness” in higher education is still deeply entrenched, notwithstanding efforts by the Trump administration to eliminate it. 

The Environmental Sociology Teaching and Mentorship Award “honors faculty members who demonstrate a notable dedication to teaching and mentorship through …actionable attention to diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

Despite the war on DEI and recent challenges by the Trump administration, college faculty and administrators are digging their heels in.James Keivom

The notice for an award for best article in a professional journal declares that “Women, people of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, and people with disabilities are especially encouraged to submit.”

And when considering an award for articles “that advance the field of sociology of science, knowledge, and technology,” the ASA calls for more applications from “scholars who identify as Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC). 

Almost three years after the Supreme Court ruled racial preferences in college admissions unconstitutional and two years after Ivy League presidents embarrassed themselves before Congress during questioning about campus anti-Semitism, and more than a year after the Trump administration began its push to end the DEI regime and restore civil rights for all students on campus, it seems that college faculty and administrators are digging their heels in.

Even Yale’s recent report that higher education’s problems are partially its own fault and Harvard’s recent ask that donors fund more intellectual diversity, things are unlikely to change any time soon. 

The Supreme Court ruled three years ago that racial preferences in college admissions were unconstitutional.AFP via Getty Images

While there may be few white men even left in the field of sociology, it is nevertheless revealing that the ASA is so brazen about its preferences for diversity and intersectional ideologies. Indeed, many schools, instead of doing away with DEI programs, simply changed their names in an effort to conceal their real purposes.  

Even the university administrators who were publicly humiliated when they seemed unsure of whether calling for the genocide of Jews would violate their academic codes of conduct —they said it depended on the “context”—have been rehabilitated. 

Liz Magill, who was forced to resign from the presidency at the University of Pennsylvania, has now been named dean and executive vice president of Georgetown University’s Law School. And Harvard’s president, Claudine Gay, who was not only exposed as a racial ideologue and hypocrite but also a plagiarist, has returned to her previous job as a fully tenured Harvard professor, and is even teaching a class on university administration (of all things). 

Liz Magill, who was forced to resign from the presidency at the University of Pennsylvania, has now been named dean and executive vice president of Georgetown University’s Law School.Getty Images

Meanwhile, UCLA, which was sued by the Trump administration and forced to pay more than $6 million in a settlement for letting protesters block Jewish students from getting to their classes, just cancelled a lecture by Bari Weiss. The Jewish head of CBS News pulled out of the event because of security concerns amidst a smear campaign by professors who tarred her with “right-wing grift” and accused her of supporting “fascism” and Palestinian “genocide.” 

And at Columbia, which reached a similar settlement, administrators delayed disciplinary action against the offending students and continued to take large sums of money from countries like Qatar, which continue to fuel anti-American and anti-Jewish bigotry.

If pressure from the president, the Supreme Court, and the American public (whose confidence in higher education has plummeted) is not sufficient to force colleges and universities to change their ways, one wonders if there is any hope left for genuine academic reform.  

Harvard’s president, Claudine Gay, has landed on her feet as a fully tenured Harvard professor.Corbis via Getty Images

It is true that the new civics programs at public institutions like the University of North Carolina, the University of Texas, Arizona State, and the University of Florida are positive developments.

It will be a great benefit to the students attending these institutions that these states have set aside funds to encourage intellectual diversity on these campuses, and to hire professors who wish to teach real history and constitutional principles, rather than identity studies and political advocacy.  

But no one should be lulled into believing that the past few years have changed the character of academia. This is a generational battle.

UCLA, which was sued by the Trump administration and forced to pay more than $6 million in a settlement for letting protesters block Jewish students from getting to their classes, just cancelled a lecture by Bari Weiss (pictured).Getty Images for The Free Press

Thousands upon thousands of faculty members in the humanities and social sciences have been steeped in far-left ideology.

University structures for hiring and promotion are all aligned to support professors who spout those ideas, and to discredit anyone daring to challenge them. It will take a lot more than a single presidential administration—even one as aggressive as this one—or a single Supreme Court decision to eliminate the academy’s deeply entrenched policies.