Friday, September 4, 2026

Trump DOJ Scraps Clinton-Era Limit on States Reporting Illegal Aliens

Trump DOJ Scraps Clinton-Era Limit on States Reporting Illegal Aliens

AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh

It stands to reason, at least, if you're not a Democrat, that illegal aliens shouldn't be receiving any government benefits. Oh, we won't deny them emergency medical care; if an illegal alien enters any American emergency room with an immediately life-threatening injury or condition, they should and will be treated. For one thing, that's a principle tenet of medical ethics; for another, we're not savages.

But beyond that? No. No Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)  benefits, no Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT), no disability payments, no welfare, no anything, no kidding. They are in the country illegally, and the only thing the United States owes them is a plane ticket home.

The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, signed into law by President Bill Clinton — a Democrat — included provisions requiring states accepting federal welfare funds, which is all of them, to report any known illegal aliens to the Department of Homeland Security. In 1998, the Clinton administration tried to walk back that requirement, to soften it, by claiming that the reporting obligation only applied to the specific state agencies managing programs like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), SNAP, or EBT were required to carry out such reporting.

The Trump administration is now rolling that back. An opinion recently issued by the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel has made that official.

Here's the initial requirement: 

Congress overhauled the national welfare system when it enacted the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105 (“PRWORA”). As part of its effort to ensure that ineligible noncitizens would not receive welfare benefits, Congress attached reporting requirements to certain federal benefits programs. See id. § 404, 110 Stat. at 2267. Under section 404, federal agencies administering such programs must inform the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) of any person they know to be not lawfully present in the United States. Section 404 also obliges any participating “State” to report any person that the “State” knows to be not lawfully present.

Then, in 1998, the Clinton administration conducted the aforementioned rollback.

In 1998, this Office narrowly construed the term “State” as used in section 404 to refer only to the “state agencies administering the particular federally funded program,” rather than all component agencies within the State. Construction of State Reporting Requirements in Section 404 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, 22 Op. O.L.C. 204, 205 (1998) (“1998 Opinion”) (emphasis omitted). We reached that view by disregarding PRWORA’s definition of “State” and giving that term inconsistent meanings within the same statutory provision.

The OLC is now redefining "State" to mean, well, the state.

Any participating state must report to DHS any person that the state knows to be not lawfully present. And “State,” as used in section 404, includes all component agencies, not only the state agency administering a covered federal benefits program. This reading follows from PRWORA’s express statutory definition of “State” and accords with well-established interpretive canons. It also finds ample support in statutory context and structure. We therefore determine that the mandatory reporting obligations in section 404(b) and (c) apply to all component agencies within a “State” and withdraw our contrary 1998 Opinion as inconsistent with PRWORA’s unambiguous commands.

This is precisely how things should be, and it's much more in line with what appears to be the intent of the 1996 welfare reform act, which was a bipartisan measure signed into law by a Democrat president.

This isn't an unusual tactic by the Left to selectively fiddle with definitions to try to soften a bipartisan law; the problem is the very nature of our Brobdingnagian federal government makes it difficult beyond measure to root out all the places this has been done, but rest assured the Democrat-governed states will be taking every advantage of those softened requirements. Furthermore, it's a safe bet that at least some Democrat-dominated states will defy this new ruling and continue to protect people who are in the country illegally. We've seen this time and again; no matter how odious the illegal alien in question is, there is some Democrat politician or functionary who will go to the wall for them.

Now, at least, another leak has been plugged. There are, doubtless, thousands more.

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2026/09/02/olc-now-withdrawing-clinton-era-limit-on-illegal-immigrant-reporting-n2206407?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

The Anti-Data-Center Movement Is the New War on Fossil Fuels

The Anti-Data-Center Movement Is the New War on Fossil Fuels

AP Photo/Kin Cheung

To many people, the growing backlash against data centers feels familiar. It resembles the anti-fossil-fuel movement that spent decades portraying domestic energy production an inherent threat to communities and the planet. In doing so, activists helped make it harder for the United States to build pipelines, power plants, refineries, and other infrastructure needed to sustain an advanced economy. The comparison matters increasingly more because data centers now occupy a similarly central role in America’s economic and strategic future. 

The movements share an uncomfortable resemblance in a number of key ways. Neither is entirely the spontaneous grassroots uprising it is made out to be. The campaign against data centers has drawn support from a network of left-wing activist groups, some with documented ties to organizations and funders linked to Chinese Communist Party-aligned interests. 

And, like the anti-fossil-fuel movement, it begins by treating new industrial capacity as presumptively harmful. Legitimate local concerns over water use, electricity demand, land use, and community impact are transformed into a broader anti-growth crusade. The strategy is also familiar: use regulation, litigation, political pressure, and ever-escalating environmental claims not to secure workable safeguards, but to stop projects outright.

"It's a playbook we've seen before," Larry Behrens, a communications director at Power The Future, said.

"I think Americans saw this with the Dakota Access Pipeline. They see this with oil or natural gas production within the United States. This seemingly grassroots organization pops up, but yet they're all wearing the same T-shirts. They're all singing the same playbook, and they're only carrying the same signs, and so when we see that, we see that that's not really a grassroots organization that money is coming from somewhere, and in this case, against data centers."

"What they do is they send their money through a maze of organizations, deliberately trying to mask what it is being used for and seeing that the tentacles reach in from far and are made to look local," Behrens said.

As for what truly drives the movement, Behrens and others argue that it is fundamentally rooted in anti-growth.

"It's the same thing that they've always opposed, any real progress they're going to be against, anything that strengthens America, they're gonna be against, and when it comes to data centers, the reason they're against them is absolutely clear because it represents American jobs, and it has to be supported by American energy," Behrens added.

"And those are two things that the environmental left just absolutely cannot stand. And they're gonna use delay or distracting tactics. They're gonna use tactics like saying it's about the water, it's about land use. But lo and behold, when it comes time to grow cannabis, they're more than happy with the water use. When it comes time to plaster solar fields across farmland, they don't care about land use. When it comes time to put their solar fields across an endangered species area, they don't care about that endangered species. It's never what they say it's about, it's always against progress and production for American energy and American workers really."

The anti-data-center movement is no longer confined to the left either. A version of the same impulse has spread to the American right, less ideological in presentation, perhaps, but often similar in effect. Many conservatives understandably distrust backroom deals, resent Big Tech, and do not want local communities treated as afterthoughts. But distrust of corporations should not become distrust of growth itself.

Misinformation, fear, and genuine local concerns have been mixed into a broad opposition to the infrastructure that will shape America’s economic and strategic future. That is how the country made energy development needlessly difficult for decades. It should not repeat the mistake by treating the engines of the next industrial era the same way.

https://townhall.com/news/dmitri-bolt/2026/09/02/why-the-anti-data-center-movement-is-reminiscent-of-the-anti-fossil-fuel-movement-n2682362?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-GpNwyKMYTB&utm_term=&_nlid=GpNwyKMYTB&_nhids=nc9d0urEUrm1ls

'They Don't Care': Watch As Dems Tell on Themselves Big Time During Hearings on Illegal Immigration

'They Don't Care': Watch As Dems Tell on Themselves Big Time During Hearings on Illegal Immigration

'They Don't Care': Watch As Dems Tell on Themselves Big Time During Hearings on Illegal Immigration
AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell

We reported earlier on how the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement held a hearing Tuesday on "Sanctuary Policies, Tragic Consequences," a frequent topic of discussion at congressional hearings on Capitol Hill as Republicans seek to further expose the callous nature of the Democrat Party's stance on criminal illegal immigrants and wide-open borders.

Among those speaking, as we noted, was Marcus Coleman, whose young daughter Dalilah was left with a catastrophic brain injury and other serious injuries following a June 2024 accident in which a criminal illegal immigrant truck driver, Partap Singh, allegedly "caused a multi-pile car wreck while driving an 18-wheeler." According to DHS, "Governor Newsom’s Department of Motor Vehicles issued him a commercial driver’s license." Dalilah, who was five years old at the time of the crash, will have to have therapy for the rest of her life due to the severity of her multiple injuries.

Though some of the Democrats on the committee pretended to show sympathy for his daughter, Coleman wasn't buying it, telling them, "I reject your guys' sympathy, to be honest. There's no way you are sorry. Not one of you guys has ever called me. Not one of you guys has ever reached out to me."

We've seen how often Democrats react with cold indifference during some of these exchanges, and sadly, the sanctuary city hearing was no exception to the rule.

Watch, for instance, as Democrat Rep. Summer Lee (PA-12), who purportedly is a "former" member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) but who still acts like one, claimed that getting criminal illegal immigrants off the streets was not the way to go about keeping communities safer in America:

In another despicable moment, Democrat Rep. Deborah Ross (NC-02) pulled a Pramila Jayapal (WA-07) by complaining about the fact that the hearing was even held in the first place. She did that even as Angel Families sat in front of her to share their stories and to plead with Democrats to do the right thing to protect innocent people from becoming victimized by people who are here illegally:

For those who missed it, here's what Jayapal said in June during a hearing on this same issue:

Adding insult to injury, during a House Oversight Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement hearing on Tuesday on unaccompanied alien children, sexual exploitation, and organ harvesting, not a single Democrat showed up. Not one.

Republican Rep. Eli Crane (AZ-02) summed it up accordingly: "I don't really think they care much."

Talk about the understatement of the year. And I think we can take "much" off the sentence, to be quite honest. These clips need to be run on a loop in ads over the next eight weeks ahead of the midterm elections, especially in battlegrounds that will be crucial to Republican efforts to maintain control of the House.

https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2026/09/01/democrats-and-illegal-immigration-hearings-n2206375?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Thursday, September 3, 2026

400,000 California Voters Didn't Provide Any ID at Registration

400,000 California Voters Didn't Provide Any ID at Registration

AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez

Because the state of California allows people to register online without providing any proof of identity, anyone could register to vote and under any name. Hundreds of thousands of people have done just that, and it once again raises the question of just how solid Democrat control in California would be without fraud.

Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, just arrested a Honduran national who illegally registered to vote in California. But it is incredibly easy to do; anyone, indeed, could do so as long as he or she has a fake address ready and checks the options for no ID and no Social Security. Apparently, almost half a million people have taken advantage of this scam.

In the clip below, Fox News co-anchor Bill Hemmer talks with Essayli about Darwin Rivera Flores, a “noncitizen born in Honduras, and you at DOJ were able to get your hands on his voter registration forms.”

Last year, Rivera “falsely claimed to be a U.S. citizen. He checked the box attesting he’s a U.S citizen born in the United States; he signed it under penalty of perjury,” Hemmer went on. “Bill, in California, there's no one checking this, right? Entirely the honor system.”

Essayli confirmed that and continued, “This case really highlights the vulnerability in California's voter rules. They basically allow anybody to register to vote on the honor system. There's nobody in government that is checking to confirm you’re a citizen, and in fact, in this case, he, on the form, [put] down a California driver's license and a Social Security [number], which he had, because he has a visa, [but] that does not prove you're a citizen. And according to the Secretary of State, they say at least half a million people don't even provide that information when they register to vote.” In his post, Essayli put the number more precisely at 400,000.

California allows a crazy number of IDs as proof for registering to vote, including health club memberships, welfare checks, senior citizen cards, and drug prescriptions. But 400,000 voters didn’t even provide that much.

For our VIPs: Grinchy Gavin Hates Christmas but Loves Ramadan

Registered Republican Spencer Pratt ought to have advanced to the general election for the Los Angeles mayoral race. Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton has rapidly closed the gap between him and Democrat Xavier Becerra in the polls. And there are still enclaves of Republicans throughout the state of California. But so long as Democrats can vote-harvest from homeless people, encourage illegal aliens to vote, and “count” for several weeks after Election Day, we can be sure no GOP candidate will ever win a major race in the state again. Of course Democrats don’t want to audit their voter rolls or require proof of ID to register and vote in the state of California. That could upset their whole insurance plan for staying in power. 

After all, why worry about audits and reforms if you know your candidates could win honestly? The only reason for fighting federal reforms tooth and nail is if election officials and other politicians know perfectly well that their elections are compromised.

https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2026/09/01/400000-california-voters-didnt-provide-any-id-at-registration-n4956769?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Republicans Are Being Shockingly Smart on Data Centers

Republicans Are Being Shockingly Smart on Data Centers

by Kurt Schlichter

Republicans Are Being Shockingly Smart on Data Centers
AP Photo/Matt O'Brien, File

The whole data center imbroglio is one of those weird situations where you have valid arguments on all sides, there’s an obvious solution, and many Republicans aren’t being complete idiots about it. How often does that happen? Not very often. Especially the part about Republicans not being complete idiots.

No one wants a data center in their neighborhood. For one thing, they’re ugly. Who wants a grim industrial complex down the street? They tend to suck up a lot of power and require support infrastructure that is likewise ugly. Also, badly designed ones can use a lot of water, and the facilities are often noisy. No one in their right mind wants to live next to one. No one wants to live next to a quarry, a steel works, or a water treatment plant either. But we need all of those too.

The fact that you’re reading this online means that you’re using a data center. Data centers are key to maintaining the technology infrastructure that allows us to live the way we do today. With the Age of AI coming, we’re going to need a lot more data centers, and we’re going to need a lot more infrastructure to power them. That’s a given. But the Chinese don’t want us to build them. They don’t like America having the ability to compete in terms of artificial intelligence and technology. They want to strangle our technology in the crib. That’s why, according to X, they have been running bot farms to gin up opposition to these facilities. President Trump likewise points out that the Chi-coms are behind a lot of the organized data center hate, and he’s got the access to the intelligence to know these things. American communists are complicit with America’s enemies, as usual. They want to talk us into going full Luddite.

Never go full Luddite.

This is all of a piece with the attack on American fracking and other energy infrastructure that America’s enemies did everything they could to stop. It’s no coincidence that all the remedies for the climate hoax happen to be all the things that make America weaker, poorer, and less self-sufficient, as well as less free. What are the chances? Well, about 100 percent, which is why the enemies of the West are so insistent on demanding endless sacrifices to appease the angry weather goddess, sacrifices that also happen to impoverish us. The only way we can be weakened is if we choose to weaken ourselves. They have to talk us into losing this race. The information operation about data centers is akin to all the other leftist information operations dedicated to making us morally and materially poor.

But while the agitation of foreign actors and internal communists who hate everything about our society is indisputable, not everybody who is reacting to data centers is reacting to propaganda. Data centers present real challenges to real people. As we have seen, data centers are ugly and annoying, and they can be a bane to a community. It’s not just agitation that is creating the opposition, and the opposition isn’t only a bunch of geriatric No Kings geeks, blue-haired communists, and sexually dysfunctional wine women. Normal Republicans are concerned about the impact on the quality of life in their communities, and they have every right to be.

Now, it didn’t have to be this way, but to the shock of no one, the neurodivergent tech bros who emerged from Silicon Valley – with notable exceptions like Elon Musk and Palmer Luckey – apparently thought that all of America was going to be as impressed with, and deferential to, them as Santa Clara County has been for the last few decades. The only thing they have in excess of money is arrogance, and they often came out to American suburban and rural communities and announced, “We’re building this ugly, brutalist behemoth here on your beautiful pastures, and you can essentially bite me.”

To the shock of no one, that was not well received. In the past, robber barons like Carnegie and Morgan and the rest were at least savvy enough to spread their money around to win a little support from regular people. You can still find the remnants of their largesse all around the country. Of course, it wasn’t entirely benevolent. A lot of it was a cynical attempt to court public opinion in an atmosphere where they were under a lot of suspicion. But it worked. And it might work for the tech bros too if they would pull their collective heads out of their USB ports.

But no. A lot of economic good stems from these autistic technological entrepreneurs, but we’re past the time of purely economic determinism. Maybe 25 years ago, the kind of Chamber of Commerce Republicans who quote Milton Friedman to tell you why you must have the entire Third World sneak into, and totally change, your country to spur that .2 percent increase in GDP would have worked. But we’ve seen the consequences of that kind of thinking, from crowded ERs to murdered Americans, and the mainstream GOP base doesn’t think that way anymore. Even for us Republicans, life is more than just economic stats and spreadsheet calculations. I would rather be slightly poorer but not flooded with a bunch of peasants from foreign hellholes bringing their garbage cultures, feuds, and ideologies to my shores. Everything’s not about the money. Some of it’s about the lifestyle, and we would like to stop having criminals take our lives and alien freeloaders living off us in style.

And we’re making the same calculation with data centers. Data centers can be a huge economic boon. The tax benefits they provide can be enormous. And they can be constructed and run in a manner that doesn’t disrupt our communities. They don’t have to be built on a historical landmark or a long-term family farm. They’re never going to be beautiful, but they don’t have to be actively ugly. You can control the water problems with closed systems, and you can generate the power on site or arrange for them to pay for the increased infrastructure they’ll require. Many communities are very happy with their data centers. If the tech companies come to these communities, which are largely in Republican areas for reasons we will get to, with a positive attitude and a willingness to address the concerns of the people genuinely, you can find solutions. We need the data centers, and we also need to not live in a dystopian hellscape.

But here’s the thing – the data centers are largely going to be located in Republican areas. You might think that maybe we should stick them in ruined blue cities and give those people a chance to work instead of live on the dole. Well, the Democrat administrations in places like that are totally corrupt, and they’re going to make it a giant pain to build in blue cities between onerous regulations and outright graft. Once they do get built, the infrastructure that the Democrats have allowed to waste away isn’t going to be able to support the data centers. You’ve got to be stupid to build in a blue city. That’s why the tech bros go out to the red areas. But if you go out and declare, “We’ve got a ton of money, and if you don’t do what we say, we’re going to buy your city council, and we’re going to bankrupt your town with litigation,” you’re going to make enemies of us Republicans.

And Republican pols, in many cases, have been smart enough not to roll over for Big Tech. In Texas, Greg Abbott has paused data center construction to audit them to make sure they’re doing it the right way. There are Republican candidates out there running on a “No data centers” platform. Why? Because the tech bros have alienated their voters.

And that’s smart for Republicans. Simply because a corporation does something doesn’t mean we have to reflexively defend it. The idea that somehow corporations and Republicans are united died decades ago. Most corporations hate us. Almost all tech corporations hate us. They give a ton of money to Democrats, and much of their content is woke. A few years ago, tech companies were censoring people like me and keeping people like you from reading the truth. We don’t owe them anything. They’re not our friends, and we have no obligation to jump on a hand grenade whose pin the tech autists pulled.

The data centers are going to get built because they must be built. But it’s not on Republicans to make it happen without conditions just because some company wants it. That’s a different kind of Republican, an obsolete one. That Chamber of Commerce crap is dead. The tech bros need to get smart, and they need to get out their checkbooks. They need to start making data centers a good deal because they’re not going to be able to jam them down our throats. Yeah, they can buy a city council, and the city council can greenlight a center, but then what’s going to happen? What’s going to happen is what’s happening now. At the higher levels of government, the state and federal level, angry Republican voters are going to incentivize their politicians to stop the abuse. For their part, the blue states will go overboard and ban data centers entirely. That’s fine. We will be happy to take the data centers and the huge benefits that go with them once the techies meet our needs and address our concerns out in red America. Oh, and the tech bros need to stop backing our enemies if they want to be friends with us. That’s the deal. Take it or leave it.

It’s nice to see the Republicans getting on the right side of an issue involving big business. For too long, we went out of our way to help people who hate us at the expense of our own base. That’s why we had – and still have some – amnesty Republicans. No thanks. The data center issue is a business transaction. If the tech bros want to get something from us Republicans, they’re going to have to give.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2026/08/31/republicans-are-being-shockingly-smart-on-data-centers-n2682108?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-24E9FhNtaS&utm_term=&_nlid=24E9FhNtaS&_nhids=ncqWjHRQTxj1ls