Tuesday, October 6, 2026

Gavin Newsom Says New CA Law Subsidizes Struggling ‘News’ Outlets to Hold Government Accountable

Gavin Newsom Says New CA Law Subsidizes Struggling ‘News’ Outlets to Hold Government Accountable

AP Photo/Nell Redmond

In a truly Orwellian move, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed the Community Newsroom Employment and Workforce Sustainability Act that funds so-called independent journalism outlets with taxpayer money. He says the infusion of government cash pays for journalism that will hold the government accountable. Those who know how modern ‘journalism’ works see that this is just a scheme for Democrats to keep ‘journalists’ employed who not only cover for them but also vote for them.

On Wednesday, Newsom patted himself on the back for forcing taxpayers to fund the very ‘journalists’ they’ve rejected. (WATCH)

He signed AB 2222, effectively a cash subsidy paid to news organizations based on how many journalists they employ 

- $20,000 per year for each of the first five full-time journalists

- $15,000 for each additional full-time journalist

- $15,000 extra, stacked on top, for new hires

- $7,500 for qualifying part-time journalists

Estimates say the cost will be roughly $55 million a year

Gavin Newsom is effectively forcing taxpayers to fund failing media organizations

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) September 30, 2026

I bet the ‘journalists’ whose jobs now depend on government funding can’t wait to hold their funders accountable.

Posters know the government's infusion of cash means outlets can no longer truthfully be independent.

Let’s be honest, this money will keep union ‘journos’ employed who vote for Democrats.

Democrats who decry state media just passed a law that essentially creates it. None of this money will go to actual journalists who are exposing Newsom and his Democrat buddies.

Democrats who despise the free press recently passed a bill that targets independent journalists like Nick Shirley, who expose government fraud. Newsom signed it into law with no hesitation.

Commenters see the hypocrisy. Newsom is against a truly free press and instead wants a bribed one.

You can write off any outlet that takes the state’s cash. One would think outlets would recognize what this law really is. But many desperately need the money. The cash may be free, but it comes with a high reputational cost.

https://twitchy.com/warren-squire/2026/10/01/gavin-newsom-signs-legislation-to-strengthen-independent-journalists-orwellian-n2432863?utm_source=twdailyamvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Survey Says: Americans Are Undivided on the Urgency to Change the Census to Strengthen Elections

Survey Says: Americans Are Undivided on the Urgency to Change the Census to Strengthen Elections

Survey Says: Americans Are Undivided on the Urgency to Change the Census to Strengthen Elections
AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

The FAIR Elections Fund is run by Cleta Mitchell, an attorney and election activist, who was instrumental in the investigations of irregularities during the 2020 election. Mitchell was also a part of then-former President Donald Trump's legal team in his battles with the state of Georgia over those results. 

Mitchell's 501(c)3 organization commissioned a poll to gauge Americans' sentiment on the U.S. Census, and how it weights against election integrity. The findings revealed two things: One, the vast majority of Americans are in agreement that only U.S. citizens should be counted when considering states' representation for the House of Representatives, and two, the Census should include a citizenship question.

EXCLUSIVE: New polling obtained exclusively by @fdrlst shows that Americans overwhelmingly believe congressional seats should be distributed solely based on the number of U.S. citizens in each state. They also think there should be a citizenship question on the census.

Those are two of the key findings from a national survey conducted by @jmclghln @McLaughlinAssoc indicating significant public support for policies — long opposed by the left — that the Trump administration is pursuing pertaining to the crucial decennial count 

The Federalist gained exclusive access to the survey and its findings.

The survey, conducted by McLaughlin & Associates on Sept. 23, shows that of 1,000 likely voters, nearly two-thirds, 65 percent, believe the congressional apportionment base should be comprised solely of U.S. citizens.

Strikingly, not only four in five self-identified Republicans, but also 54 percent of Democrats and nearly 60 percent of independents polled also somewhat or strongly agree with a policy that would necessarily exclude illegal aliens and other noncitizens from the count.

The poll also found that 75 percent of likely voters, including nearly two-thirds of Democrats, somewhat or strongly agree that census respondents should disclose whether they are U.S. citizens on the census form. Such a query could be used to facilitate efforts to exclude noncitizens from the apportionment base.

This has been a battle waged during both Trump administrations. The Trump 45 Commerce Department attempted to limit the Census to only United States citizens, and to restore the citizenship question to the Census surveys. The administration ran into the buzzsaw of radical leftist lawfare, and the clock was run out. 

Now, the Trump 47 Commerce Department is trying again.

These findings come days after the Commerce Department, under which the Census Bureau sits, proposed a rule to exclude all but U.S. citizens and green card holders from the population numbers used to distribute congressional seats. That rule would modify the Census Bureau’s “residence criteria,” under which past administrations had distorted the apportionment base by counting “residents” of each state irrespective of their immigration status — thereby including millions of illegal aliens. This has led to the disproportionate allocation of representatives and electoral college votes to states with large non-citizen populations, rewarded sanctuary jurisdictions with undue power, diluted the voting power of Americans, and entrenched foreign influence in our political system.

The proposed rule also indicates that the bureau may add a question to the census to ascertain the “legal status” of respondents to implement the contemplated apportionment policy.

Benjamin Weingarten's piece continued:

While unclear how the second Trump administration’s renewed efforts will fare in the court of law, the polling provides evidence of bipartisan popularity for the initiatives in the court of public opinion.

Something else from the survey Americans agreed upon: the methods used for 2020 Census were questionable, at best, and wholly corrupt at the worst. So, if the Commerce Department fails to enact its desired changes, Americans will have no confidence that the 2030 Census will be conducted accurately. More from The Federalist's report:

The survey asked other questions relevant to Trump administration efforts to correct problematic aspects of prior decennial counts. One query concerned whether respondents would be confident in the accuracy of the 2030 census, given the fact that the 2020 census used “algorithms and projections” to complete the population count instead of an “actual headcount” and that the Census Bureau admitted to making errors leading to a misallocation of House seats. A majority, 52 percent of respondents, indicated they were “Not Confident” the 2030 count would be accurate. Sixty-four percent said they would have more confidence in the count if it the bureau were “required to simply count the actual U.S. population” this time around.

This question alluded in part to the practice of “differential privacy,” a process used in the 2020 census whereby the bureau introduced “statistical noise to protect confidentiality.” Trey Mayfield, counsel to the director of the Census Bureau at the end of the first Trump administration, testified before a House Judiciary Committee panel last year that under the practice, the bureau “adds fake people where they do not live and subtracts real people from where they do live. Thus, all the reported enumeration census data from 2020 below the state level is false.” He and other authorities argue that the method is both unconstitutional, violating Congress’ duty to conduct an “actual enumeration,” and illegal.

We are 33 days from the November 2026 midterm election, so this survey will not move the needle this election cycle. However, it will weigh mightily in the 2028 election, and will be critical for the 2030 midterms.

https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2026/09/30/fair-survey-finds-election-integrity-has-bipartisan-consensus-n2207589?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Dems' Haplessness Makes Them an Even Bigger Existential Threat to the Republic

Dems' Haplessness Makes Them an Even Bigger Existential Threat to the Republic

Dems' Haplessness Makes Them an Even Bigger Existential Threat to the Republic
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

This is a column that I had kicking around in my head a few weeks ago. I set it aside because every time I begin to ponder the current hot messiness of the Democratic Party it becomes apparent that the mess has gotten much worse since the last time I thought about it. 

As the kids are fond of saying, there's a lot to unpack there. 

The Democrats I dealt with for most of my forty-plus years as an activist were a well-oiled political machine. Ever since President Donald Trump was first elected, the machine has been broken and leaking oil everywhere. This party isn't a shadow of its former self; it bears no resemblance whatsoever to its former self. As we have been saying for years, moderate Democrats from the late 20th century would almost certainly be Republicans today. 

While I don't think that the 2026 midterm elections are a last stand proposition for the United States of America, I do believe that we are getting closer to an election like that. A strong showing by the Democrats in November that allows them to take back even marginal control of Congress will bring the country closer to the brink. Not exactly end times, but end times adjacent. 

Please bear in mind that, until now, I've never been much of a gloom and doom type when it comes to politics. I've spent the last decade chronicling the Democrats' downward spiral deeper and deeper into madness, however, and know that these people should never be in charge of anything again. 

Dems have been struggling with an identity crisis throughout their various primaries this year. The older, establishment Democrats are having their hold on power in the party threatened by the success of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). The identity crisis revolves around the fact that the DSA members are loud and proud about their socialist/commie leanings, while the establishment Dems prefer to be closeted about theirs to help them in their efforts to dupe people in flyover country. The people at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) would have preferred that this family feud didn't erupt until next year, but the hammer and sickle scamps in the DSA are a bit anxious. 

On top of the internecine spat, the Dems haven't had anything in the way of messaging beyond, "We hate President Trump," to offer the electorate. Their coherent policy idea cupboard has been bare for quite a while now. 

Given the toxic levels of flailing over in Dem Land, the GOP's chances for bucking historical trends in November should be good. There are days when I am convinced that they are. President Trump is a variable that they haven't yet been able to figure out, and his "X factor" potential in this election cycle looms large. 

What does worry me, though, is that the Democrats are not unlike an unhinged, cornered rabid animal these days. Because it's now a party dominated by coastal elites, there is also an almost feral quality when Dem politicians are out in normal America. There is a complete lack of regard for civility and convention that makes them unpredictable and dangerous. 

In Tuesday's Morning Briefing, we discussed the shunning that Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is getting from Dem candidates in more purple parts of the country. That might seem promising for those who are hoping that the DSA won't wrest complete control of the party away from the establishment. Things are so out of sorts with the Democrats right now, however, that AOC may still become their brightest star for the 2028 election, which is the stuff of nightmares. 

The depth and intensity of the chaos on the Democratic side of the aisle could have some perilous consequences for the United States. There are still a lot of Democrats in middle America who aren't clinically insane but have been reflexively voting as legacy Dems for so long that they might cast their ballots for any DSA commie who could get the '28 nomination. 

Rabid wild animals can also do a lot of damage to themselves. That's something worth remembering as Election Day draws near. Simply getting out of the way might be the best offense for some Republican candidates. 

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/09/29/dems-haplessness-makes-them-an-even-bigger-existential-threat-to-the-republic-n4957101?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Monday, October 5, 2026

Don’t Start It!

Don’t Start It!

by Kevin McCullough


Don’t Start It!
AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi

This week, my social media feeds have filled with satellite images, many reportedly from Google Earth, showing whole neighborhoods of Gaza reduced to gray rubble. The posts accompanying them tend to share a single conclusion: this is the evidence of genocide, and Israel is guilty of it.

The images are sobering. They should be. Behind every collapsed roof was a family, a kitchen table, children who went to sleep there. Anyone who can look at those pictures and feel nothing has lost something important. Grief over the suffering of Palestinian civilians is not a betrayal of Israel, and it is not weakness. It is simply what decent people feel.

But grief is not the same as understanding. A photograph taken from orbit can show you what happened to a place. It cannot tell you why. And if we are going to render judgments that history will record, we owe it to the dead on every side to get the why right.

Go back to October 6, 2023. On that day, there was a ceasefire in place between Israel and Gaza. Israel had withdrawn every soldier and every settler from Gaza nearly two decades earlier, in 2005. Hamas had seized full control of the territory in 2007. Whatever grievances existed, and there were many, the people of southern Israel went to bed that night in their kibbutzim, and young people danced at a music festival near the border, believing they were at peace.

The next morning, Hamas terrorists crossed that border and murdered roughly 1,200 people, most of them civilians. They killed elderly people in their homes and parents in front of their children. They committed acts of sexual violence. They took more than 250 hostages, including babies and grandmothers, back into Gaza. It was the deadliest single day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust.

Hamas didn’t build that capacity alone. For years, the Islamic Republic of Iran has funded, armed, and trained Hamas as part of its network of proxy forces aimed at Israel’s destruction. The rockets, the money, the expertise, the ambition to strike at the Jewish state from every direction: much of that traces back to Tehran. Iran has been content to fight Israel to the last Palestinian.

Hamas spent years building hundreds of miles of tunnels beneath Gaza’s homes, schools, mosques, and hospitals. It placed its fighters, its weapons, and its command centers among the very civilians it claimed to govern. It did this deliberately, because it understood that when Israel responded, and it knew Israel would respond, the resulting devastation would become its most effective propaganda. The rubble in those pictures is, in no small part, the rubble Hamas planned for.

Genocide is not a synonym for war, or even for terrible war. It means the intent to destroy a people. It is worth remembering which party in this conflict has a founding charter calling for the killing of Jews, and which party spent the war issuing evacuation warnings, opening humanitarian corridors, and repeatedly offering to stop fighting if the hostages came home. One can criticize specific Israeli decisions, and people of good faith do, without surrendering the moral distinction between a nation defending itself and an organization that began the slaughter on purpose.

I spent 18 straight hours on the air on September 11, 2001, the day after I was named host of my program. I remember the images of lower Manhattan, the smoke and the twisted steel. No serious person looked at Ground Zero and concluded that America was the aggressor. Nor, when America answered, did the rubble left behind in Afghanistan erase the question of who had started it.

One of the first rules of the playground was simple: don’t start it. It was not a rule meant to excuse whatever came next. It was a recognition that the one who throws the first punch bears a unique responsibility for everything that follows. Adults sometimes pretend that geopolitics is too complicated for such a lesson. It is not.

I confess I grow weary of having to explain this. But weariness is no excuse for silence, because history is being written right now, one viral image at a time, and too much of it is being written without its first chapter.

The destruction in Gaza is real, and it is heartbreaking. It is also the direct consequence of a choice made by Hamas, backed by Iran, on October 7. Had that choice not been made, those neighborhoods would still be standing.

If we want fewer images like these in the future, the lesson could not be plainer. Don’t start it.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2026/09/29/dont-start-it-n2683777?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-wm9zUDqCD2&utm_term=&_nlid=wm9zUDqCD2&_nhids=nc9d0uLEfrm1ls