Sunday, July 19, 2026

Must Watch: Rubio Goes Hard on the 'Unique Evil' of Far-Left Terrorism, Promises More to Come

Must Watch: Rubio Goes Hard on the 'Unique Evil' of Far-Left Terrorism, Promises More to Come

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

As I reported last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has invited the foreign ministers and other senior officials from over 60 countries to Washington, D.C. for a summit on combatting the "resurgence of transnational far-left terrorism." 

That summit is taking place as I write this on Thursday morning, and Rubio kicked it off with one heck of a speech. But before I get to that, I want to share a few notes from the State Department, which defines the resurgence of transnational far-left terrorism as "violent attacks against private citizens, government officials, police and law enforcement, businesses, and critical infrastructure across the globe."

Historically, most politically motivated terrorism in the West has been carried out by violent far-left groups and individuals. Between 1970 and 1980, far-left terrorists were responsible for 93% of terrorist attacks and 58% of terrorism-related deaths.

Since 2016, far-left terrorist plots and attacks have sharply increased in the United States and Europe, with a growing trend of violence against individuals.

Far-left anti-government terrorism now accounts for more attacks and plots in the United States than any other ideological category.  Far-left actors were responsible for 63% of all recorded anti-government attacks or plots as well as three out of the four anti-government fatalities in the United States in 2025.

In 2024, there were 21 attacks in the European Union attributed to far-left and anarchist terrorists, as compared to 24 attacks from jihadist terrorists that same year.  Of the 45 reported terrorist attacks in Europe in 2025, 12 were attributed to far-left and anarchist actors.

Over the past three years, Europe has experienced a record high number  of terrorist attacks targeting rail networks, critical infrastructure, and private businesses, resulting in millions of euros in damage and economic disruption, with most attacks attributed to far-left and anarchist actors.

So far, the State Department has designated various Antifa groups as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and during his speech on Thursday, Rubio promised there are more to come. It's also offered "up to $10 million for information disrupting the financial mechanisms supporting designated far-left terrorism groups," and in May, it hosted the inaugural Counter Terrorism Law Enforcement Workshop. We're increasing how much we engage with our foreign partners on this matter, and we're coordinating with foreign governments to improve law enforcement and restrict travel for these terrorists, too. 

Rubio began his speech by saying that the number one responsibility of any government should be to protect the people it represents. 

He went on to point out that for a long time, counterterrorism in the United States focused primarily on Islamist extremism, which was necessary, but that there had always been a blind spot when it came to extremist violence from the political left.

He accused many in the press, academia, and other legacy institutions of dismissing left-wing violence as a "right-wing fever dream." He added that "a bomb planted by a Neo-Nazi group" is often labeled a "nefarious and murderous act of evil," while a "bomb planted by a Marxist Revolutionary" is "just merely a tragic excess of idealism."  

Rubio went on to say that many people here in the United States dismiss acts of violence and terrorism if it benefits the left-wing cause and that it's time to put an end to that. He pointed to the George Floyd riots from the summer of 2020 and how media outlets called them "mostly peaceful" despite all the obvious violence and crime we saw with our own eyes, as well as other more recent examples, like Charlie Kirk's murder, assassination attempts on Donald Trump, violence against ICE officers, and a transgender individual shooting up an elementary school. He listed numerous examples from other countries as well.   

Here are some clips from that part of the speech. 

Then he dropped this, which was the best part of the speech in my opinion. This is exactly why I like this guy: 

This is a distinctive and unique evil. It has always been driven by a hatred, above all else, a hatred for civilization itself. It is a revolt of the worst against the best, a revolt of the weak and cowardly against the strong and the good. It's perpetrated by those who cannot build, who cannot create, who cannot achieve great things, and take their revenge upon the world for their own inadequacies, by seeking to destroy those who can.

This is what radical leftism is. It may wear various different slogans and ideologies across place and time. They call themselves anti-capitalist or anti-imperialist, communist, anarchist, Marxist, but the fundamental character is always the same. It is a poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of equality, justice, and liberation; an overwhelming need to tear down what greater men have built; to wreck what is beautiful and what is right on behalf of people who are only filled with ugliness and have nothing else to offer.   

You can watch the entirety of that part of the speech here: 

He pointed out that these incidents are not limited to certain countries because these groups do not recognize borders. "Under President Trump, for the first time, the United States is building the infrastructure, the partnerships, and the strategy to defeat the scourge of far-left terror," he said. 

And he concluded by saying, "We will dismantle these networks brick by brick. It is time for the people of the civilized world to defend ourselves."  

If you prefer to watch the entire speech rather than clips — which I highly recommend — you can do so here. 

Nikki Haley's Got Something to Say to the 'Ladies' at 'The View'

Nikki Haley's Got Something to Say to the 'Ladies' at 'The View'

AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell

I hope you're sitting down for this one. The 'ladies' at The View don't like something Republicans did. Shocker, right? 

In this case, it's the fact that Gov. Henry McMaster appointed the late Lindsey Graham's sister, Darline Graham Nordone, to hold his place in the Senate until a new senator for South Carolina is elected. 

Now, I know some of you didn't like this idea, but you didn't like it for legitimate reasons. The ladies at The View didn't like it because... um, well, because she's a woman. 

"I don't love it," Sunny Hostin said. "You know, she'll be the first woman to be a U.S. Senator in South Carolina in the history of the state, and I think that that's just fundamentally wrong that South Carolina just couldn't elect a woman, and this was the only way it's done. I think that experience does matter... I don't think she should be representing the people of South Carolina in the U.S. Senate."  

"Isn't this the very definition of DEI?" Joy Behar asked. 

"Correct. Correct. It's everything that the Republican Party stands against. Everything," Hostin continued. "It's DEI, nepotism, all these things thrown in together." She went on to talk about how Pete Hegseth is preventing women of color from becoming admirals or some such nonsense. 

I'm not from South Carolina, but I am from the South, and I'm sick and tired of getting dumped on by people like this who live in their little elitist bubbles. Wasn't it Hostin who said last week she was scared of houses with American flags because they're racists or some such nonsense? I laughed my tail off at that because my black neighbor has the biggest flagpole on my street, but I digress. 

Anyway, let's be clear: This is some sort of "the South is sexist/racist" stereotype code talk that people like this love to throw around. Well, I'd like to take a moment to school Hostin. 

First up, South Carolina has no problem electing women, and one of the most prominent female politicians, who happens to be a Republican, spoke up to let them know. Former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley posted a video of this The View exchange and politely corrected them between what I imagine were fits of laughter.

"The ladies of The View are already losing their minds about Senator Darline Graham Nordone because South Carolinians just could never 'elect a woman,' Haley wrote. "…I'm pretty sure we took care of that 16 years ago 😂 Congrats, Darline. You’re already making us proud!"   

Haley served as the state's governor from 2011 to 2017 and went on to serve as ambassador to the United Nations during Donald Trump's first term. And since these "ladies" love to put people into groups, Haley was not just the state's first female governor, but she was also the state's first governor of Indian descent, the country's second governor of Indian descent, and the first person of Indian descent to serve in a presidential cabinet. 

I'm guessing Rep. Nancy Mace would also like a word. She's a woman. She's a Republican. South Carolinians voted for her.  

And let's look at South Carolina's other senator, one of my favorites, Sen. Tim Scott. He happens to be black, but is he "DEI?" No. The people of South Carolina have voted for him in elections, too. He's there on merit, something Democrats don't seem to be able to wrap their brains around. 

Imagine that, a backward Southern red state that has voted for a female governor, a governor of Indian descent, and one of the handful of black senators currently serving in the United States.  

And as for nepotism, this is standard bipartisan procedure for a Senate vacancy. I did a little research and found at least 40 to 50 examples of female relatives appointed to congressional seats when someone (usually their husbands) died. It's pragmatic — these women usually know their relatives' district and views, and it helps maintain stability and continuity. 

Finally, I'd like to say that Sunny Hostin doesn't need to cry nepotism to anyone — glass houses and all that. We just learned recently that her 24-year-old son was out jogging on active Metro-North railroad tracks when he was cited by law enforcement for trespassing. Hostin didn't take this too well and reportedly called up the police and played the "Do you know who I am?" card. 

Rules for thee but not for me. This woman is ridiculous. I don't know much about Sen. Graham Nordone, but I am willing to bet that she's 1,000 times more intelligent than that entire table of women put together.  

https://pjmedia.com/sarah-anderson/2026/07/15/nikki-haleys-got-something-to-say-to-the-ladies-at-the-view-n4955095?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-Sg3k2ZZ9eV&utm_term=&_nlid=Sg3k2ZZ9eV&_nhids=ncBXkIPEIMngls

Oh, the GOP Just Got Some Very Good News About the 2026 Midterms...

Oh, the GOP Just Got Some Very Good News About the 2026 Midterms...

Oh, the GOP Just Got Some Very Good News About the 2026 Midterms...
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

The good news is that the Democratic Party isn’t gaining momentum as we reach the dog days of summer. The bad news is that we still have a long way to go until Election Day. A new phase of the conflict with Iran has begun, prices could rise, and the issue of affordability might once again hurt President Trump and the Republican Party’s numbers. Even before this latest generic poll was released, the president needed to boost his favorable ratings, and gas prices had to come down. There’s no alternative here: the price must come down. Full stop. But we digress. 

RealClearPolitics’ election analyst Sean Trende posted something yesterday that probably irritated liberals. He believes soft Republicans are returning, but right now, we’re in a place where it’s not unlikely that Republicans win the House:

Don’t pop champagne or get too excited, but it’s worth watching. In North Carolina, a Democratic firm, Public Policy Polling, found that former Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper, once very popular, is leading Republican and former RNC chair Michael Whatley by only four points. Even PPP admits the GOP has a chance to win here—Whatley needs to boost his name recognition, which he’s trying to do by completing a 100-county tour of the state. A GOP win here would almost end Democrats’ long-shot hopes for the Senate. The House was more likely to flip, but even that remains uncertain. 

The Democrats lack a clear message beyond ‘we hate Trump,’ and they have no solid agenda. Their brand is weak, and their polling numbers are poor. Their leaders are unpopular, and now they’re dealing with a socialist insurgency that further complicates messaging efforts, while possibly draining resources needed to defend candidates seen as more electable and incumbents. Oh, and the Democrats are almost broke.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2026/07/16/oh-the-gop-just-got-some-very-good-news-about-the-2026-midterms-n2679521?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-u5d2d2VfBQ&utm_term=&_nlid=u5d2d2VfBQ&_nhids=ncBXkIPEIMngls

Saturday, July 18, 2026

Kurt Schlichter says it

Leftist Women Are an Abomination
AP Photo/Michael Dwyer

Leftist Women Are an Abomination


A 43-year-old Trump-hating American woman named Jamey Carney decided to move to Ireland to escape the Bad Orange Man’s reign of terror, shack up with her Palestinian asylum seeker boyfriend, and… well, that misadventure ended about as well as a sentence that begins “I thought the pitbull looked cute, so I petted it…” or “But I thought I could fly…” Spoiler Alert: Her Muslim dreamboat got mad at the uppity infidel and bludgeoned her to death. Who could’ve seen that coming except anybody with eyes? It’s kind of amazing how Darwinism results in a self-cleaning gene pool.

No, I would prefer that she had not been murdered by the semi-human, Third World savage she decided was a viable alternative to a nice, normal Western male, but my bandwidth of caring is necessarily limited. One can only genuinely care a finite amount; pretending to care endlessly and without limits is just moral posturing, of which there is far too much. That’s why one must carefully curate what he chooses to care about. Neither you nor I can possibly care about all the wrongs in the world, and we should not take some of that precious caring that would otherwise be devoted to someone who is not the architect of her own miserable fate and squander it on someone who is.

The point here is not the bad judgment of one dumb liberal woman from America. The point is the bad judgment of an enormous number of dumb liberal women from all over the West. These self-righteous crones are a pestilence, a plague upon Western society, a group of doggedly ignorant feminist/chauvinists playing out their personal psychodramas on the world stage whose antics, if unchecked, will inevitably lead to the fall of civilization.

Too extreme? Look around you at what’s going on. These creatures range from the ridiculous blue-haired faildaughters with gender studies degrees and a career in baristaing, to the gray-maned boomer women reeking of patchouli and sexual dissatisfaction at your local No Kings rally, to Angela Merkel, the German chancellor who decided she needed to shut down Europe’s greatest economic power’s entire energy industry even as she was importing most of the Third World with utterly predictable rapey consequences. Just look at this lunatic who stands a significant chance of being a Senate nominee for a major political party. The patriarchy built a civilization; the mediocre matriarchy wants to tear it down out of guilt, boredom, and sexual frustration.

If you’re looking for policy that’s not just bad but civilization-shakingly bad, there’s a better-than-even chance there’ll be women-identifying women behind it. Orwell called it in "1984": “It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.” If it’s a bad idea, chances are there’s a chick behind it.

And that includes empowering the trans nonsense—do you think for a minute that dudes with the whole sausage shelf swinging would ever be allowed in women’s locker rooms if there weren’t significant numbers of high-status women demanding it? Do you imagine that the majority of men would refuse a majority of women who were demanding we exclude these perverts? Hell no—the guys would look at the women as if they were crazy, asking, “Wait, there are dudes doing what?” and out would come the torches n’ pitchforks. But, in fact, it’s women who demand that these creeps be allowed to invade women’s intimate spaces and women who demand that these mutants dominate women’s sports. Not all women, but enough high-status and influential ones to make it happen. Remember, the only thing these broken women hate more than men is unbroken women.

This is the cue for critics to whine and complain because I’m talking about the specific and particular failures of women. Remember, we must pretend that every specific group, except straight white dudes who believe in Jesus and normal genders, each provides its own wonderful and unique attributes to the beautiful tapestry that is diversity. And yet, while we’re required to pretend that each group has uniquely compelling good points, even where the evidence demonstrates to the contrary, we’re also required to pretend that none of them has uniquely compelling negative points. Well, when women screw up, they often screw up in a uniquely female way. And, at the risk of being called a sexist oppressor even harder than usual—because they’re always going to call you a sexist oppressor—that’s the truth, and it’s irrelevant that some feminist doxie cries when she hears it.

Now, of course, men also screw up in their own uniquely compelling male ways. Take what just happened in Maine. We have both Herr Oystergruppenführer, a guy who appears almost as a parody of toxic masculinity, as well as the up-talking femboy socialist consultant who thought that this was just the guy to take on that fascist demon Susan Collins. Maybe he thought that a red flag was a good thing; after all, he was a communist. But the subject at hand is women and how women screw up, and women do screw up even if saying so ticks off the girlbosses. At the individual level, we see how Platneresque convicts on death row are often inundated with mash notes from women on the outside. When they finally get led over to Old Sparky, you always read about how the wife they married while in prison sobbed to the reporter about how their three-named monster hubby was really a wonderful and gentle soul, totally oblivious to the four people he chopped up with an axe after robbing them for $12.

The unfortunate Jamey Carney is akin to these nitwits. She was living in New York and the mother of a 13-year-old daughter, but then Trump came along, and she was so mad at him that she decided to move to the Emerald Isle. At a Palestinian protest, of course, she met Ahmad Al-Saqar, a 28-year-old dude also living in Ireland—on the dole, naturally—and they fell in love. Well, she fell in love. He beat her brains out around July 7-8. Gee, how could this fairytale romance have gone so wrong?

Writ larger, she was one of those ridiculous ladies who stand there with a sign that says, “Refugees Welcome,” demanding that even more perverted Third World peasants flood her country. Like gays for Palestine, it’s a societal suicide pact that they somehow think they’re exempt from. The numbers are undeniable. The majority of rapes in Europe are linked to migrants, even though they make up less than 10 percent of the population in many countries. But does that stop liberal women? No, it probably encourages them. Oh, I don’t think they want to be raped and beaten to death personally, but I think that they believe, at some level, that members of their own society deserve that fate. They believe their societies are evil, which naturally makes them the heroines in the young adult novel that is their lives, and they’re trying to atone for it by this ritual humiliation and sacrifice.

You see this all the time, with ridiculous lefty women demanding that we defund the police and close prisons while female judges sentence violent psychopaths to probation. They cast it as mercy and grace, but it’s not. They’re seeking to punish the rest of us for the sins they have adjudicated us guilty of committing as a society. In other words, they know full well the damage they’re doing. It’s intentional. It’s penance. Some, like Carney, have convinced themselves that their advocacy for the destruction of their own society will give them a free pass. They simply don’t understand that the foreigners they adore as the avengers of all the myriad wrongs they attribute to their own society hold them, correctly, in utter contempt.

Ahmad Al-Saqar always despised the late Ms. Carney for her weakness and stupidity, just like these savages always despise their Western cheerleaders for their weakness and stupidity. When she annoyed him, he murdered her because that’s what happens in his garbage culture. Ms. Carney could not conceive of that because she grew up in a civilized culture, one created, ordered, and defended by the kind of strong American males she holds in such contempt. It’s only in such a society that she and the other liberal wine women so despise that her brand of ideological frivolity cannot merely survive, but flourish. Yet, as soon as they encounter the barbarians outside the gate that she and her friends want to cast open to the invaders, they are suddenly outside the protection they have known all their lives. They can act the fool while people they hate watch over them and protect them, but once they put themselves in a position where the men of the West can’t protect them anymore, they are subject to all the consequences of their choices. And that’s why Jamey Carney is dead.

It’s sad for her, but it’s infinitely sadder for our society as a whole. Again, we have only a finite amount of sincere caring allocated to us. At some point, people need to learn not to put their hands on the stove. Yet they’re happy to risk being burned as long as the rest of us go up in flames. For that reason, we should devote the same amount of sincere caring to her and her ilk as they devote to us.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2026/07/16/leftist-women-are-an-abomination-n2679422?utm_source=pjmediambvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

The Commie Call Is Coming From Inside the Democrats' House

The Commie Call Is Coming From Inside the Democrats' House

AP Photo/Ryan Murphy

Top O' the Briefing

Happy Thursday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Swansbeagrum preferred not to discuss the year he spent playing xylophone for Finland's very belated answer to the Village People. 

Gosh, we talk about socialism a lot lately, don't we? OK, I talk about communism but, as I wrote the other day, I use the words interchangeably. 

What I find odd is that so many in the political chattering class — both on the right and left — are acting as if the young idiot Zohran Mamdani wing of the Democratic Party is dragging the party in a new direction. Seriously, I see more of that than you might think. As I have been saying and writing for months, the Dems long ago wandered into Commie Land, they were just heavily invested in pretending that they hadn't. Until President Donald Trump upended the political tradition apple cart in 2016, the Democrats used to be better at playing a more subtle long game in politics. Since then, they've been singularly focused on being consumed by hatred for the man who denied their alcoholic Ice Queen the presidency that they felt she was entitled to. 

Any nuance in strategy or tactics is lost to the Democrats now. Their coyness about being too far left is gone. The older Dems may not be shouting their love of socialism from the hilltops, but they also haven't once told Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to shut her perpetually gaping maw. The old Dems are just like the new Dems. Mamdani and his ilk are the lizard faces that are revealed when the American masks are pulled off.  

All that is really happening with the Democrats right now is a good, old-fashioned power struggle between the young and old. There is no ideological struggle here, because there isn't anything that Zohran Mamdani believes in that Chuck Schumer or Hakeem Jeffries disagree with. Still, some of the Democratic old guard (read: Clinton people) would like to put on a show for the public and say that isn't so. 

My Townhall colleague Amy Curtis wrote yesterday about former Hillary Clinton advisor Al Mottur and his harsh words for the youthful commie types in the party:

"These people, they're not crazy, they're ideologues. They don't love America, let me say that," said Mottur. "A lot of these people do not love America and I'm not team Democrat, I'm team America. And if we have people in our party who are so far Left, that they are saying we don't want to protect people from crime, well, that's just absurd. And, by the way, we're not going to win a national election, let alone an election in Michigan, if that's our position."

Cool story, Al. Here's the thing, though — it is mainstream Democrats who have firmly established the soft-on-crime ethos in your party, not the young'uns. You all believe the same things, the younger Dems are just louder and more honest about what they're up to. It's working for them right now because they've seen how feckless the Dem establishment has become since it's been riddled with Trump Derangement Syndrome. Voters in general want something positive to get behind, but it's more true for younger voters who are filled with unbridled idealism. "We hate that guy!" doesn't move them. 

Zohran Mamdani is vehemently opposed to ICE, but if you look at his public proclamations and interviews, you'll notice that he doesn't spend a lot of time specifically whining about President Trump. He's got too many fake free things to offer the kids. 

Democrats have been repeatedly swan diving into the 20% deep end on every 80/20 issue there is, so it shouldn't surprise them that the rowdy youth want to make it all louder. No older elected Democrat is in any position to tell the young commies that they're going too far. My latest column is about an Opinion piece in The New York Times that outlines exactly where and how the Democrats should dial back the far-left insanity if they want to win elections again. You read that right — The New York Times is saying that the party is too out there.

The Democratic Socialists of America aren't a political party, they're a political organization. DSA "luminaries" Zohran Mamdani and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are registered Democrats. They don't need to start a new party, they already belong to one that's sympathetic to everything that they believe. 

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/07/15/the-morning-briefing-the-commie-call-is-coming-from-inside-the-democrats-house-n4955078/?utm_campaign=nl_pm&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjmediambvip