Saturday, September 19, 2026

The DSA Isn’t Just Coming for Capitalism. It Is Coming for American Sovereignty.

 The DSA Isn’t Just Coming for Capitalism. It Is Coming for American Sovereignty.

The DSA Isn’t Just Coming for Capitalism. It Is Coming for American Sovereignty.
AP Photo/Heather Khalifa, File

The Democratic Socialists of America are no longer just a threat to America’s economic system. They are increasingly a threat to American sovereignty as well. 

That was the warning from Stu Smith, an investigative analyst at the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal, in congressional testimony this week. Smith argued that the DSA has developed relationships with foreign political parties, participated in overseas delegations, coordinated with international political movements, and pursued domestic advocacy that often aligns with the interests of foreign governments.

The concern is no longer limited to the DSA’s calls to replace capitalism, confiscate private property, redistribute wealth on a massive scale, or abolish traditional law enforcement. It is also that a domestic political movement gaining influence inside the Democrat Party appears increasingly comfortable operating as part of an international ideological network, one whose priorities do not necessarily hold themselves to the interests of the United States.

"Thank you to the chairman and the ranking member and the rest of the committee for the opportunity to address you. I am an investigative analyst who focuses on extremism. I am here to discuss the DSA's international activities and organizing efforts which I believe pose significant concerns for American sovereignty," Smith said during his opening remarks.

"These activities are rooted in proletarian internationalism, a revolutionary anti-imperialist vision of global working-class solidarity aimed at overthrowing capitalism. The causes the DSA champions abroad are antithetical to the American project. Their support for governments including Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea raise serious concerns about its willingness to minimize or disregard the authoritarian practices and human rights abuses associated with those regimes."

"DSA's national leadership is increasingly acting as an international political actor, developing relationships with foreign political parties, participating in foreign delegations, coordinating with overseas political movements, and engaging in domestic political advocacy that intersects with the interests of foreign governments," Smith said. "There's a common saying inside the DSA, put 10 socialists in a room and you will get 11 different answers. The phrase reflects the organization's big tent character, bringing together anarchists, communists, Maoists, Marxist-Leninists, socialists, social democrats, and others across the left."

"It obscures a more important question, who has the power to turn those 11 answers into reality?"

Smith pointed to several particular examples, revealing how the DSA has worked through foreign state-controlled organizations linked to China, Cuba, and Venezuela. The group has also sent 40-person delegations, including its national co-chairs, to Cuba and Venezuela, where members received luxury hotel stays, fawning state-media coverage, and government-hosted treatment before returning home to turn their trips into organizing material.

That alignment has, predictably, led the DSA to downplay human-rights abuses committed by communist and authoritarian governments. 

The organization has not exactly hidden its foreign connections either, proudly aligning itself with the so-called "international Left" and devoting much of its energy to blaming Western action for other countries’ failures. In Cuba, for example, the DSA blames the island’s humanitarian crisis on U.S. sanctions rather than the corruption, repression, and economic mismanagement of the communist regime.

The danger is no longer merely that the DSA admires failed regimes abroad and hopes to import their ideas here. It is that the organization increasingly treats America as a conduit for a global left-wing movement rather than a sovereign nation with interests of its own. That is the threat to American sovereignty Smith raised: a movement that does not simply want to reshape our country, but one that wants to do so with no regard for our principles that make us so uniquely good.

https://townhall.com/news/dmitri-bolt/2026/09/17/the-dsa-a-threat-to-american-sovereignty-n2683142?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-FKxfBG7TCp&utm_term=&_nlid=FKxfBG7TCp&_nhids=ncb4mIXLuYljls

Explosive Judiciary Committee Report Accuses ActBlue of Major Fraudulent Donation Cover-Up

Explosive Judiciary Committee Report Accuses ActBlue of Major Fraudulent Donation Cover-Up

Explosive Judiciary Committee Report Accuses ActBlue of Major Fraudulent Donation Cover-Up
ActBlue logo

The House Judiciary Committee, along with the House Administration Committee and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, released an interim staff report on ActBlue, the Democratic fundraising platform.

In that report, the Committees found that ActBlue failed to prevent illegal foreign political contributions, and it's being called an "explosive" insight into the organization's practices.

Two years ago, the Committees began investigating ActBlue's fraud-prevention practices. In 2024, ActBlue changed its fraud policy twice during the presidential campaign, reportedly implementing "more lenient" standards that let foreign donors and other suspicious donor money flow into U.S. campaigns.

Earlier this year, The New York Times reported that the organization's lawyers warned that its chief executive had given potentially misleading responses to Republican investigators. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a suit against the organization over its allowing foreign donations and lying about its donation practices.

When called to testify before Congress, several ActBlue staffers ended up pleading the Fifth, and more recent reporting showed that an elderly Michigan woman made 15,000 donations totaling more than $150,000 to various candidates, including Abdul El-Sayed, through ActBlue. That woman — who lives in a trailer on a fixed income — denied making those donations, although she said she has sent some money to Democrats.

In its report, the Committees found that not only did ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones may have misled Congress about ActBlue's review process for foreign contributions and that it appeared to be "knowing and willful" in accepting those contributions, but that the organization also engaged in whistleblower retaliation.

You can read the entire report here:

New information obtained by the Committees also showed ActBlue had an "unserious" approach to fraud prevention. This includes failed policies that allegedly "prevent" illegal, fraudulent contributions; a "passport verification process" that was an "ineffective security method" that did not require a valid U.S. passport number; and instructions to fraud prevention analysts to "give the donor the benefit of the doubt" and ignore red flags on donations with foreign indicators.

This means ActBlue employees were often instructed to accept a donation they had previously rejected over signs of being an illegal foreign contribution. One employee said that a donor who "has a few red flags, such as IP/billing mismatch and a concerning IP provider name, a foreign credit card, an odd email domain, and [is] connected to other rejected users via browser fingerprint," should be accepted because ActBlue "can't say for sure that this is fraud." An analyst reported "an odd pattern of small donations to the [Kamala] Harris campaign using prepaid cards." But another ActBlue employee said that donation was "good to accept."

In its conclusion, the report said, "American elections belong to American citizens. ActBlue, one of the largest online political contribution platforms, maintains unserious fraud-prevention practices that allow illegal foreign donations in U.S. elections. The Committees have been conducting oversight ofActBlue’s lax fraud-prevention practices since 2024. This third interim report presents new information about ActBlue’s unserious approach to fraud prevention."

It also noted that "internal logs show how ActBlue maintains a culture that instructs fraud analysts to err on the side of accepting questionable foreign donations."

ActBlue continues to deny any wrongdoing.

This report should send shockwaves through the Democrat Party, because the issue here is bigger than a handful of suspicious donations or a few questionable decisions by fraud analysts. Federal law prohibits foreign nationals from contributing to American elections, and ActBlue, as it moved billions of dollars into political campaigns, had a responsibility to take signs of foreign or fraudulent activity seriously and to follow federal law.

The Committees' investigation alleges that ActBlue repeatedly did the opposite: weakening safeguards, loosening guidelines, giving questionable donors the "benefit of the doubt," and instructing employees to look for reasons to accept contributions even when transactions raised red flags.

Those findings raise a much larger question that Congress, regulators, and ultimately ActBlue itself will have to answer: How much questionable money made it through those safeguards and into American political campaigns? And who will be held accountable for it?

https://townhall.com/news/amy-curtis/2026/09/16/explosive-judiciary-committee-report-accuses-actblue-of-major-fraudulent-donation-cover-up-n2683088

Leftists’ masks are coming all the way off — revealing the ugly truth

Leftists’ masks are coming all the way off — revealing the ugly truth

Leftists are kind, generous people who just don’t understand the practical consequences of their ideas. 

They feel too deeply and try too hard to prevent inequality as they live in a fantasy world of rainbows and unicorns.

Artwork celebrating Luigi Mangione is seen on MacDougal Street in Greenwich Village on Friday, September 11, 2026.Christopher Sadowski for NY Post

Yeah, that’s a bunch of BS. 

There may be a few such “useful idiots” (as Lenin called them) on the left, but these last few months the masks have been coming off.

Arguably the big reveal began with the leftist celebration of Luigi Mangione, who murdered UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson in late 2024. 

It was a watershed moment: Suddenly, many on the left felt free to proclaim that they saw killing CEOs as virtuous.

And in recent weeks the vitriol has flowed ever more openly.

Now it isn’t just CEOs; when Erin Placenti, a 32-year-old Bank of America vice president, was fatally stabbed last month by a nut in Times Square, leftists cheered because she worked for a bank that had issued a “buy” recommendation for Israeli bank stocks. 

Last week, the anniversary of Charlie Kirk’s assassination — which occurred while he was politely debating leftist college students in an open forum — spurred “Happy Kirkiversary” and “Merry Kirkmas” outbursts on campuses around the nation.

A family photo of Pamela Cisneros, 49, for her birthday celebration on Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2026, in Jackson Heights, New York.Obtained by NY Post

Drag performers have reveled in his death: One currently touring show features a performer dressed as Kirk with blood pouring from his neck; another, billed as a drag fundraiser for the ACLU, had a drag queen dolled up like Charlie’s widow Erika Kirk, theatrically weeping. 

(How darkly ironic to exploit the death of a true free-speech martyr to raise money for a supposed free-speech organization.)

Meanwhile, a lone black man who stood up to the bullying of 11 white jurors to prevent the acquittal of confessed killer Lindsay Clancy has been subjected to widespread threats and character assassination by fellow jurors, the media, Clancy’s defense lawyer (as well as his wife) and a host of ghouls via TikTok.

More and more, leftists support violence and threats of it against anyone who openly disagrees with them, or stands in their way, on the grounds that such dissidents are bad people and deserve it.

A Charlie Kirk sign, vandalized with red paint, is shown at Turning Point USA’s headquarters in the Ahwatukee Foothills on Sunday, Sept. 13, 2026, in Phoenix, Arizona.IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

Or that they deserve violence based merely on their race, as Carnegie-Mellon University Prof. Uju Anya has repeatedly declared on X.

Anya, who attained notoriety for wishing Queen Elizabeth II “an agonizingly painful death” and cheering Rush Limbaugh’s demise, was challenged last week for her macabre habit of rejoicing at the deaths of white people.

Her reply: “Die first, white man, then ask yourself why I’m dancing.”

Likewise, Texas Senate candidate James Talarico says white men are America’s top terror threat, and that he prays to overcome his own “whiteness.” 

He seems to regard himself as a “non-practicing white person,” a term that has taken hold in some sectors of the left. 

Nowhere in America is open racial hate as common as among the far leftists who dominate the Democratic Party.

And sometimes the hate is purely political —  the type that leads people like Shelly Headen, a Democratic candidate for North Carolina’s state legislature, to post a picture of herself in front of the ovens at the Dachau concentration camp and caption it, “This is where Trump supporters belong.”

Lindsay Clancy supporters show their solidarity as they wait in line outside Plymouth Superior Court as the jury deliberated in the murder trial for the death of her three children on Friday, Sept. 4, 2026, in Plymouth, Massachusetts.Josh Reynolds for NY Post

Leftism is steeped in hatred and revenge even when it’s disguised as help for the poor.

Its “help” is always focused on taking money from those who have done better — never on helping poor people themselves do better, via things like school choice or safe streets or limiting job competition from illegal immigration. 

It’s no fun helping poor people if it doesn’t hurt your enemies, and it’s fun to hurt your enemies even if it doesn’t help poor people.

The roots of modern leftism are planted deep in the French Revolution — which produced the Terror, the first true police state, and eventually a military dictatorship and wars that killed millions — and in Karl Marx, who together with Friedrich Engels (neither of whom ever held a real job) called for a bloody revolution ending in the dictatorship of the proletariat.

It’s all about envy, and about a desire for power and importance on the part of people who haven’t risen as high in existing society as they think they deserve. 

These feelings of inadequacy and envy get expressed as violence.

We need to get them therapy instead.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/16/opinion/leftists-masks-come-all-the-way-off-revealing-the-ugly-truth/