Monday, May 4, 2026

Erika Kirk Brilliantly Dismantles White House Correspondents’ Hypocrisy

Erika Kirk Brilliantly Dismantles White House Correspondents’ Hypocrisy

AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

Erika Kirk slammed attendees at the White House correspondents’ dinner who inspired the shooter’s hate but had intended to enjoy a luxury dinner with Donald Trump undisturbed, calling it the “ultimate hypocrisy” to “manufacture the hate and then profit off the results.” The crazies were “willing to have dinner with ‘Hitler’” if it meant free champagne.

Leftists believe in hurling the most inflammatory and vile rhetoric at their opponents, ginning up as much violence and chaos as possible, but never personally experiencing the negative results of any of their own lies. The same journalists and media anchors who spent years calling Donald Trump the greatest threat to democracy were cheerfully attending a dinner with him as the featured speaker, illustrating they didn’t really believe their own extreme rhetoric, as Erika highlighted. The problem is, Cole Allen did believe the rhetoric to the point of allegedly attempting to murder Trump administration officials at the dinner on April 25.

“We may have big problems with illegal immigration in this country,” Erika said. “I have to tell you, we have an even bigger problem when it comes to the systemic indoctrination and radicalization of our own citizens. This is what got my husband killed.” It’s what inspired Cole Allen.

Charlie Kirk wanted his wife Erika to take over as head of his organization, Turning Point USA, if anything ever happened to him. Since her husband’s tragic assassination, she has managed to deal simultaneously with her own grief and that of her young children while also zealously carrying on Charlie’s legacy — all while sickos vilify her. She was understandably very traumatized by the assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, but that did not stop her from continuing to tell the truth afterward with courage.

She emphasized, “Many of the left-wing journalists that attended the WHCD have spent years consistently calling President Trump a ‘Nazi’, a ‘threat to democracy’, and ‘Hitler’,yet they still joyfully attended the evening’s event.” But if “they truly believed their own rhetoric, they’re either joyfully willing to have dinner with ‘Hitler’ or they’re lying to radicalize American citizens with narratives they know are grossly exaggerated.”

For Our VIPs: Peace Only Happens When Both Sides Want It — and Jihadis Don't

Systematic indoctrination from media, politicians, and schools created the deadly violence that murdered Charlie and almost murdered Trump, Erika insisted. “This is what has led to three legitimate attempts on President Trump's life, and I can speak firsthand to that unbearable toll that this must take on our First Lady. There has never been a president who has faced this many assassination attempts in America's entire history.”

But Democrats and their brainwashed acolytes have been shooting at Republicans since Abraham Lincoln’s assassination. There is more than a century of political violence behind us, with Dems escalating all the time. Too many Democrats believe killing those with whom they disagree is laudable.

That’s why after each Trump assassination attempt, “the reaction from the far left has been, at best, a shrug, and in some cases, a sick disappointment that the shooter was unsuccessful,” Erika went on. “We are all human beings. And if you can just — if you can just pause and just take a minute and ask yourself, how would you feel if even just one person made cruel jokes about the attempted murder of your loved one?” The problem is that the party of supposed empathy has lost all ability to empathize with others. Leftists cry “compassion” but enact assassination.

All Charlie Kirk did was tell the truth with charity, and yet a deranged leftist assassinated him. And all the mainstream media hacks who repeatedly lied about Charlie over the years were complicit in that horrific tragedy, as the White House Correspondents’ Dinner attendees were complicit in Cole Allen’s TDS.

https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2026/05/03/erika-kirk-brilliantly-dismantles-white-house-correspondents-hypocrisy-n4952448?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Trump Torches 'Human Garbage' Democrats for Their Desperate Midterm Election Interference Plot

Trump Torches 'Human Garbage' Democrats for Their Desperate Midterm Election Interference Plot

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

President Trump unleashed a fiery but mostly peaceful attack on Democrats Sunday evening, branding them “human garbage” for their latest desperate scheme to meddle in the upcoming midterms.

Trump, in a post on his Truth Social media platform, tore into Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Barack Obama’s former Attorney General Eric Holder after the latter was added to a highly partisan, deceptively named “voter integrity” task force. 

Holder, of course, has been a driving force behind the Democrat party's obsession with rigging the electoral map through his and Obama's “Redistricting U.” operation since 2016.

"So ironic that Cryin’ Chuck Schumer and the Democrats are hiring SLEAZEBAGS like Barack Hussein Obama’s Crooked former Attorney General, Eric Holder, and others of that ilk, to look into Voter Integrity, when this same group of Human Garbage RIGGED the 2020 Presidential Election," Trump fumed.

Trump noted that the resistance party that pretends to be passionately concerned about 'saving democracy' is actively fighting tooth and nail against the SAVE America Act, which would crack down on voting abuses and strengthen election security. And he had a few choice words for Republicans who seem content to sit on their hands when it comes to this uber-important legislation.


READ MORE: Obama Whines That Redistricting Is a Threat to Democracy, But His Past Efforts Come Back to Bite Him

Trump DOJ Vows to Enforce SCOTUS Ban on Racial Gerrymandering Nationwide—Obama Hardest Hit


Trump is calling on Republicans to grow a spine and fight back before it’s too late. 

GET TOUGH REPUBLICANS — THEY’RE COMING, AND THEY’RE COMING FAST! They’re no good for our Country, they almost destroyed it, and we don’t want to let that happen again! These are highly dishonest people who are, in many ways, treasonous, in that they are trying to destabilize the United States of America in what, some would call, a War. Republicans must TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, and approve all of the necessary Safeguards we need for Elections to protect the American Public during the upcoming Midterms.

Assuming the GOP will rally and unify in an attempt to secure the upcoming elections and fight the opposition's years-long effort to rig elections—either through racially motivated redistricting efforts or the invasion of illegals in this country—may be wishful thinking. It shouldn't be, but when you see feckless Republicans joining Democrats in thwarting efforts to save the SAVE America Act, it makes one understandably pessimistic.

Obama, in 2019, shared a post from All On The Line, a campaign affiliated with the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC), and a group that teamed up with Obama to create a program known as "Redistricting U."

Obama, in announcing the effort, said he could not "wait to begin organizing when the redistricting process starts in 2021," adding, "we need to build this movement from the ground up–right now.”

Holder serves as chairman of the organization, which coordinates legal challenges, fundraising, ballot initiatives, and grassroots organizing aimed at drawing favorable maps for Democrats.

"With fair maps and a more just electoral system, we can have leaders who are more likely to tackle the important issues facing our country and be more responsive to the needs and desires of the people they were elected to represent," he proudly states on the group's page.

While Democrats posture as defenders of “voter integrity,” reality paints a much clearer picture. People like Holder and Obama have spent years weaponizing redistricting through their “Redistricting U.” operation to draw racially gerrymandered maps that pack districts with Democratic voters. They've been pushing every available loophole to tilt elections in their party’s favor for years.

It's manipulation dressed up as protection of elections. It's only when the GOP fights fire with fire that they feign concern about election integrity.

Republicans must understand that they are dealing with "garbage" people who are the true existential threat to democracy. Pass the SAVE America Act and end their little games once and for all.

https://redstate.com/rusty-weiss/2026/05/03/trump-torches-human-garbage-democrats-for-their-desperate-midterm-election-interference-plot-n2201944?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Guess Who’s Big Mad They Can’t Buy Junk Food With Your Tax Money Anymore

Guess Who’s Big Mad They Can’t Buy Junk Food With Your Tax Money Anymore

AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh

Food stamp users in Florida are waking up to some big changes that took place in their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits that took effect April 20. The entitlement program’s beneficiaries can no longer use their EBT cards to purchase soda, energy drinks, candy, and “ultra-processed prepared desserts” such as Twinkies, cookies, cupcakes, and other packaged sweets.

They can continue to use their taxpayer-funded, free-food cards for fruit, vegetables, grains, meat, dairy and other staples. They can also use their EBT cards for coffee, tea, bottled water, and sport drinks. On the snack side, they can use their EBT cards for granola bars, freshly prepared baked goods, and packaged “breakfast” foods such as toaster strudels and breakfast biscuits.

The federal government did not implement the restrictions, even though the state of Florida’s SNAP program receives subsidies from the government. Rather, this a state policy which is being implemented under a waiver program from the Trump administration.

Guess who’s not happy about the change?

Other than the fact that this woman appears to be an able-bodied, young mother, it’s impossible to know from this video anything else about her, such as whether she has a job, how much she earns from that job, if she’s married or living with a partner in a two-income household, and what her other bills are.

According to Futbolete News, a mother with two children in the same household can receive up to $785 per month just in SNAP benefits, not including any other entitlement program benefits.

So, taken on face value, what we see in this one video is someone who is appears capable of holding a job sponging off of taxpayers for whatever her EBT card will get her. Instead of being grateful for having all of the nutrition options listed above, she’s angry that she can’t waste your tax money on unhealthy, non-essential foods with no nutritional value for her and her kids.

The Florida SNAP website said the reason for the change was “to better align the program with its intended purpose: providing low-income households with access to a more nutritious diet to alleviate hunger and combat malnutrition,” adding, “SNAP benefits can continue to be used to purchase the same healthy, nutrient-rich foods they always have, including fruits, vegetables, grains, meat, dairy, and other staples that support a balanced diet and overall well-being.”

Of course, the health and nutritional benefits of this move are lost on SNAP benefit recipients who don’t know the first thing about healthy eating – people whose idea of a well-balanced diet includes the four major food groups: soda, ice cream, cookies, and cupcakes.

Florida’s decision to put restrictions in place on what SNAP benefit recipients can buy was made possible by a new waiver program instituted by the Trump administration’s U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which administers SNAP benefits. States can now apply for waivers so that they can limit the foods and beverages that qualify for SNAP coverage.

According to Fast Company, “Florida is the 10th state to begin enforcing unhealthy food and drink bans through federal SNAP food restriction waivers.” Eight more states are expected to institute their own restrictions on SNAP purchase later in 2026. These states include Hawaii, Ohio, Missouri, North Dakota, South Carolina, and Virginia.

In instituting its restrictions, Florida follows Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.

Fast Company, which used to be must-reading for leaders in growth industries, where innovation, hard work, and merit are king, went woke years ago, which explains this take on the junk food restrictions:

One major concern is the added burden placed on retailers. The Food Research & Action Center, a nonprofit advocacy group, warns that small and independent stores, which serve as critical access points for millions of program participants could be at risk of losing their authorization to accept benefits.

And then, of course, Fast Company reminded us that you and I are monsters if we allow welfare recipients to feel stigmatized by refusing to pay for their junk food, “Critics also argue that the restrictions stigmatize low-income Americans and strip away their freedom of choice without addressing the root causes of hunger."

An NGO called the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said that the restrictions in Florida will have an impact upon roughly three million SNAP recipients, and that nationally, SNAP counts 41 million participants.

None of this touches on the amount of likely fraud at play where people who don’t deserve those EBT cards are using them next to you in the checkout line every week, or the sheer number of illegal aliens spending your hard-earned money with their own EBT cards.

They call them “entitlement programs” for a reason. People feel entitled to spend your money on foods that contribute to their health problems, collectively creating an epidemic of such health problems as obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and more. And all of that drives up your health insurance and healthcare costs, because you know they’re not paying for those benefits, either. You are.

My attitude is this. The moment I pay for your SNAP benefits, then I should have a say in how you can spend my tax money. If you want to choose unhealthy foods, then go earn your own money.

https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/05/02/guess-whos-big-mad-they-cant-buy-junk-food-with-your-tax-money-anymore-n4952420?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Sunday, May 3, 2026

The Elitist Media Despise Black Conservatives

The Elitist Media Despise Black Conservatives

The Elitist Media Despise Black Conservatives
AP Photo/Eric Gay

Black conservatives perennially face the slur that they're "not really black" if they aren't on the Left. Not only that, they are tools of white racists if they dissent from the NAACP's hard line.

When the Supreme Court voted 6-3 to overturn a racially gerrymandered congressional district in Louisiana, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) was outraged by the local Deseret News in Salt Lake City prominently featuring an Associated Press photo of a lone black protester in front of the court holding a sign that said, "Thurgood is watching you, Clarence." That implied Thurgood Marshall was disappointed in Clarence Thomas.

Lee tweeted: "They're going after Justice Thomas for being conservative while Black. That's racist. And it's very, very wrong." He added: "It'd be absurd to assume that Justice Alito should agree with the late Justice Brennan because he's white. It's racist and offensive for @Deseret to suggest that Justice Thomas should agree with the late Justice Thurgood Marshall because he's Black."

Rep. Burgess Owens (R-Utah), a black conservative, seconded that thought: "When the Left can't beat a Conservative Black man's argument, they attack his Blackness." For example, the Congressional Black Caucus has a membership of 60 Democrats, but none of the five black Republicans in Congress.

This kind of slur greeted Thomas when he was nominated for the Supreme Court in the summer of 1991. NBC reporter Bob Herbert uncorked a commentary underlining "David Duke, former Ku Klux Klan leader, is crazy about Clarence Thomas." Columnist Carl Rowan wrote Thomas had no talent, only the ability to "bootlick" Reagan and Bush, that "If you gave Clarence Thomas a little flour on his face, you'd think you had David Duke talking."

That same spirit continues today, as the ladies on ABC's "The View" were upset with Justice Thomas. Joy Behar complained he "didn't stick up for his own." Two years ago, Behar complained that Sen. Tim Scott doesn't understand being black, "the systemic racism that African Americans face in this country and other minorities. He doesn't get it. Neither does Clarence. And that's why they're Republicans." At the time, Sen. Scott tweeted: "When a Black conservative who believes in the future of this nation stands up to be counted, they lose their minds."

The standard leftist line is represented by Sen. Cory Booker, pushing hyperbolic lies. "Morning Joe" championed his tweet that Thomas and Co. gave "a green light for unconstitutional attacks on the voting rights that generations of Americans bled and died to secure." But no one has been denied the right to vote.

The Left insists that unless blacks get to elect other blacks, they have no voting rights. So what happens when a majority-black district elects a white guy (Steve Cohen in Memphis) or an Indian guy (Shrinivas Thanedar in Detroit)? Did their voting rights disappear?

It got worse. Booker told MS NOW's Jonathan Lemire that the Court's verdict is "eliminating black representation, disenfranchising African American voters by drawing creative districts that completely take away any kind of representation." So all 65 black members of Congress are going to lose their seats? Or too many Democrats might?

It's also bizarre that Booker would talk about "drawing creative districts," when that is exactly what many majority-minority districts look like on a map — as it was in this court case, the Sixth District of Louisiana, which looks like a squashed centipede intersecting the district of Speaker Mike Johnson.

Black conservatives aren't in favor of "eliminating" black legislators or "disenfranchising" black voters. But leftists will villainize them like this because negative campaigning can work. Pretending only black Democrats are black isn't going away.

https://townhall.com/columnists/timgraham/2026/05/01/the-elitist-media-despise-black-conservatives-n2675348?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-85yfsGq4ue&utm_term=&_nlid=85yfsGq4ue&_nhids=ncqWjHq0Fxj1ls

Same Old, Same Old: Target Trump

Same Old, Same Old: Target Trump

Same Old, Same Old: Target Trump
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

At the White House Correspondents' Dinner, President Donald Trump was the target of yet a third assassination attempt — this time in full view of the Washington press corps.

The event was presented as a spirited night with Trump. After 11 years of avoiding the predominantly left-wing media event, he decided to revisit the dinner. He anticipated that he would be the object of ridicule inside the hall — and that he might see possible violence outside it.

Indeed, protesters ringed the hotel. In grimly prescient fashion, the usual sort of crowd that night was channeling John Wilkes Booth — sic semper tyrannis — with placards reading "Death to Tyrants."

They again almost got their wish.

All three of the would-be Trump shooters — along with Charlie Kirk's murderer — fit the predictable profile of arrested-development, deranged leftists. They apparently sought to reify the popular Democrat hatred of Trump and his supporters, thereby imagining themselves entering the pantheon of revolutionary heroes.

So too, not long ago, did the would-be killer of Trump, Austin Tucker Martin, storm Mar-a-Lago in search of the absent president.

This time, the latest assassin, Cole Tomas Allen, left a manifesto repeating the old saw of Trump as "Hitler" and sought to kill the president and his Cabinet members. Indeed, his incoherent screed read like a Petri dish of all the supposed sins of Trump, drawing on left-wing conspiracies about Russian collusion, lawfare myths, and the Epstein files.

Allen's attempt was another fantasy of mass murdering, not unlike that of former Bernie Sanders campaign aide James T. Hodgkinson. He tried to take out Republican congressional leaders — wounding four, including House Republican Majority Whip Steve Scalisen— in a baseball practice in Washington.

Other than the fact that the shooter nearly reached the doors to the auditorium, the Secret Service performed brilliantly — despite the Democratic effort to shut down the Department of Homeland Security.

Apparently, the Left's mindset is that the security of elected officials — Trump especially — and of American citizens is not nearly as important as ensuring that foreign nationals who entered the country illegally are not legally returned to their countries of origin.

Assassins are motivated by all sorts of impulses, but certainly they do not act in a void.

From the trickle-down world of social media, the internet, and street theater, would-be killers absorb elite signals. This messaging becomes especially baleful when celebrities, governors, senators, and politicos amplify the claim that Trump is a fascist, a Nazi, a monster who is destroying the country and who must be stopped "by any means necessary." Late-night comedians joke about past assassinations or assassination attempts; others have even claimed that Trump staged his first assassination attempt — and this one too!

So deep runs their hatred.

For over a decade, the Left has escalated its rhetoric of violence against Trump. Each politico, actor, celebrity, or billionaire seems to vie with the next in imagining new ways to kill or assault him.

Had that sort of rhetoric been directed at former presidents Barack Obama or Joe Biden, it would likely have put many of them in jail.

Count the Ways of Ending Trump?

So, how many ways have our elite leftists dreamed of beating up or murdering Trump?

Gavin Newsom, Nancy Pelosi, and Robert De Niro all preferred punching him out. The now-infamous Kathy Griffin opted for beheading. So did Marilyn Manson.

The New York actors of Shakespeare in the Park turned Julius Caesar into Trump and staged his mass stabbing.

Mickey Rourke fancied clubbing; Snoop Dogg, shooting.

The late celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain's choice, predictably, was poisoning.

"Comedian" George Lopez seconded the Iranian idea of a bounty killing. Pearl Jam offered the macabre vision of a bald eagle feeding on Trump's corpse.

Larry Wilmore dreamed of suffocating Trump. Do we remember Moby and Madonna, who opted for blowing up Trump?

Rosie O'Donnell tried to be original by envisioning Trump being thrown off a cliff.

Johnny Depp joked about a John Wilkes Booth-style Trump assassination. Epstein friend and billionaire Reid Hoffman preened, "Yeah, I wish I had made him an actual martyr."

Do we recall Biden's boast to his donors: "So, we're done talking about the debate. It's time to put Trump in a bullseye."

In that regard, he-man Biden simply reverted to his earlier bullyboy boasts: "If we were in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him," and "The press always asks me, 'Don't I wish I were debating him? No, I wish we were in high school — I could take him behind the gym. That's what I wish."

For all the praise of the Secret Service's quick reaction, there is no excuse for the shooter having pranced into his hotel room with weapons and then meandering through the lobby armed. During the Biden presidency, the Secret Service was derelict in the first two close-call Trump assassination attempts.

Do we even remember that Biden denied Secret Service protection to candidate Robert Kennedy Jr. out of pique that his original Democrat challenger might weaken him and help put Trump back in the White House?

In 2024, January 6 Committee Rep. Bennie Thompson (MS-2), crafted a law — ridiculously entitled the "Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable (DISGRACED) Former Protectees Act" — to strip away Secret Service protection for then-former President Trump?

What was Thompson's wish?

Hitler Trump?

Do we remember the New Republic cover where Trump was photoshopped as Adolf Hitler?

When called out, The New Republic doubled down, offering no apologies for its sick messaging.

"Today, we at The New Republic think we can spend this election year in one of two ways. We can spend it debating whether Trump meets the nine or 17 points that define fascism. Or we can spend it saying, 'He's damn close enough, and we'd better fight.'"

And so you encourage fellow leftist comrades like Cole Tomas Allen, Ryan Wesley Routh, and Thomas Matthew Crooks to "fight" — to eliminate your Trump-Hitler, allegedly another mass murderer of six million.

The now media-orphaned Joy Reid repeatedly and ad nauseam invoked Trump-Hitler memes: "Then let me know who I got to vote for to keep Hitler out of the White House." Rachel Maddow sermonized that she was studying Hitler in order to understand Trump.

Those who tried to kill Trump — and murdered Charlie Kirk — likely assumed they would eventually be canonized for ending the "Nazi" threat.

Indeed, Trump is now the only U.S. president in history to be the target of three assassination attempts involving gunfire — with more than two years to go in his tenure as a target.

Since the Trump inauguration, ritualized left-wing street violence has become the norm — torching Tesla dealerships and cars, swarming ICE officers and facilities, and violent campus demonstrations on behalf of Hamas, usually characterized by overt antisemitic rhetoric and harassment of Jews.

ICE officers are routinely attacked, pelted with rocks and bottles, and doxxed — the street-level version of the Democrat-elected officials who slander them as Nazis and fascists and promise to arrest them for the crime of enforcing federal immigration law, deliberately undermined by the Biden administration.

Piker Sickness

The latest left-wing heartthrob podcaster, the affluent Hasan Piker, just gave a gushing interview to affluent New York Times reporter Nadja Spiegelman and affluent New Yorker writer Jia Tolentino.

The two adoringly nodded as Piker matter-of-factly declared it was perfectly fine to rob stores — and anyone and anything that he arbitrarily defined as part of the oppressor class. "Yeah, I think it's cool. We gotta get back to cool crimes like that. Bank robberies. Stealing priceless artifacts, things of that nature." So spoke the multimillionaire Piker.

More disturbingly, Piker has more or less suggested that the cold-blooded assassin of UnitedHealthcare CEO Thompson, Brian Luigi Mangione, had understandable cause to kill — under the Marxist defense of "social murder" against purported enemies of the people.

I mention Piker because, earlier in 2025, at a public event, he referred — with a wink and nod — to killing Trump. Indeed, he declared, "Someone has to do it. See, when I say that, everyone knows exactly what I mean."

Of course, they did on cue. His giddy interviewer, Taylor Lorenz, later highlighted Piker's Trump threat in a video.

The Democrat Addiction

Post facto, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries commendably urged lowering the political temperature. One good way would have been for Jeffries not to have attacked Trump's prior "Big Beautiful Bill" while posing with a baseball bat.

Or Jeffries might have politely advised congressional Democrat women not to cut a "Choose Your Fighter" video in which they shadowbox and throw punches to stop Trump. Or he might have advised his Democrat colleagues, such as Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, Bernie Sanders, and Jasmine Crockett, to stop smearing Trump as a fascist.

For years, we were lectured by the Left that "words matter," in defense of their efforts to censor "misinformation," "disinformation," and "hurtful language." But all that now appears to be abject projection, since it is the Left's verbiage that has lowered the bar on the violence and encouraged killers to come out of the shadows to save us from supposed "fascists" and "Hitler" types.

Do we also recall the would-be assassin Nicholas John Roske, who joined left-wing protestors crowding the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices — a felony — and was planning to kill Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the perennial target of hysterical left-wing attacks?

Not long ago, Minnesota governor and former vice presidential candidate Tim Walz flew, in a time of war, to address a socialist, anti-American audience of Trump haters in Barcelona. Once there, Walz trashed Trump as a fascist — for the sixth time.

On two occasions, Walz's running mate Kamala Harris referred to Trump as a fascist — this from Harris, who, in 2020, live on television and in the midst of the George Floyd riots in Washington, encouraged the demonstrations by saying, "They're not gonna stop, and everyone beware, because they're not gonna stop . . . They're not gonna stop before Election Day in November, and they're not gonna stop after Election Day . . . Everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they're not going to let up--and they should not. And we should not."

And they never did stop, Kamala.

In the last 22 months, Trump has survived three assassination attempts. At the present rate, sadly, we should expect another three or four efforts before he leaves office.

Why?

The hardcore left-wing establishment believes this sort of Hitler/Trump rhetoric, combined with the normalization of street violence, generates ever more protests, fuels anti-ICE fury, unites congressional Democrats, and — most importantly — drives down Trump poll numbers. In their view, it is a lot more effective than merely outlining an alternative agenda.

So expect far more, not less, of this left-wing violent madness to come.

https://townhall.com/columnists/victordavishanson/2026/04/30/same-old-same-old-target-trump-n2675360?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-TVsJSUN55X&utm_term=&_nlid=TVsJSUN55X&_nhids=ncqWjHq0Fxj1ls

There’s a Name for What They’re Doing to Donald Trump

There’s a Name for What They’re Doing to Donald Trump

Stefani Reynolds/Pool via AP

Once upon a time, there was a societal pact in this country that, when a depraved lunatic committed an atrocity, no one would breathe a word of his motives, speech, or writings. When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold kicked off the school shooting craze at Columbine High School in 1999, we didn’t speak of what they thought they were accomplishing. Their so-called basement tapes were never publicly released, and authorities destroyed them in 2011. "Law enforcement officials have always regarded the tapes as a particularly infectious form of toxic waste, a primer in mass murder that could inspire more violence and must never be released," reported the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition.

The understanding was that repeating a lunatic’s motivations could inspire copycats. Back then, society hoped to prevent more tragedy.

Today’s Democrat establishment hopes to inspire it. So brazen have they become that, less than 24 hours after Cole Allen tried to assassinate President Donald Trump, CBS reporter Norah O'Donnell read the slander from his manifesto to his intended victim’s face. Trump called her out, saying, "Well, I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you're horrible people.”

He was right, but no matter: Management at CBS still went on to air those poisonous words on its Sunday show, 60 Minutes. Because everyone at that vile network is in on it.

So is every single newscaster, elected or appointed official, celebrity, and every other leftist with a sheen of authority or influence and a platform who repeats the litany of leftist accusations.

But then, Democrats are the morally challenged segment of society, dating back to their slaveholder roots (now manifested as fighting to keep their cheap labor through trafficking poor people into the country to work for near-slave wages). Once they hid behind the "liberal" label, but that has morphed into what plainly animates them today: hate, perversion, and political violence. Cheering on an assassin, either explicitly or implicitly, is A-OK with them.

Democrats are also all about plausible deniability. Just ask Joe Biden's grifty brother, Jim. This is why this sort of mass projection of violence in the hopes of triggering a nut with good aim is such a perfect fit for them.

It's called "stochastic terrorism." Perhaps, in the case of the relentless attack on Donald Trump, we can more accurately call it "stochastic assassination."

Policy research agency RAND explained the concept in a 2024 report called "From words to actions":

The role of the media in radicalisation and terrorism has been a topic of discussion in recent years. Citizens are increasingly at risk to be exposed to extremist ideas through social media and communication apps, which can lead to a normalisation of hatred towards certain individuals, groups or institutions and an increased acceptance of violence. A term that is gaining popularity in the media and popular scientific literature in the context of recent incidents of extremist violence in which the media may have played a role is 'stochastic terrorism'.

This term refers to hostile, derogatory and/or dehumanising language by influential individuals towards a political, social, ethnic or religious group or individual. Through interaction on social media and traditional media, this language may lead to a climate of fear, which in turn increases the likelihood of someone turning to violence, even if the initial message does not explicitly call for it. Due to the implicit nature of these expressions, individuals responsible for (reinforcing) inflammatory discourse cannot straightforwardly be prosecuted, if at all. However, there is currently no legal definition or even a unified understanding of this somewhat elusive concept.

My colleague VodkaPundit explained how the left is leveling the tactic against the president: "…there's no conspiracy required to produce a left-wing assassin like Tyler James Robinson or Ryan Routh. They just amp up the rhetorical pressure, 24/7/365, until somebody pops."

Do read the whole thing: No Conspiracy Required

For example, remember during Trump's first term, when TIME LIFE put out a Special Magazine called "ASSASSINS Killers Who Changed History"? And then newsstands and retailers festooned their businesses with the issue?

Oh, no — no wink-wink nod-nod to your friendly neighborhood assassin there!

It is nearly impossible to prosecute someone for stochastically calling for an assassin to step up. James Comey and his g**dam seashells are now a test case. You can’t tell me that a man so steeped in law enforcement as to become director of the nation’s police force had no idea that the expression "86" might be interpreted as "off," "murder," or "kill." Especially within the historical context of two would-be assassins trying to kill "47" not a year earlier, with one spectacularly putting a bullet through the president's ear. 

That smarmy beanpole knew exactly what he was doing. They all do.

If it happens one day — if some nut job succeeds in killing the man — then all these leftists who participated in this mass psy-op will be just as guilty as if they had pulled the trigger themselves. They don't care, of course. There will be no consequences. Stochastic terrorism is near-impossible to prosecute, and even if we could, we couldn't put half the country in jail. So, what the hell — it's worth a shot to these dehumanizing haters.

They know damn well what they're doing.

https://pjmedia.com/athena-thorne/2026/04/30/theres-a-name-for-what-theyre-doing-to-donald-trump-n4952360?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm