Thursday, February 12, 2026

CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and One Said the Quiet Part Out Loud

CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and One Said the Quiet Part Out Loud

AP Photo/Tom Brenner

Today, the chiefs of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Rodney Scott and Todd Lyons, faced off against a horde of deranged House Democrats before the Homeland Security Committee. These men and their respective staffs had to have known this was going to be a circus, and their assumptions were proven correct. 

Lyons and Scott were subjected to smear attacks, even threats from House Democrats for enforcing federal immigration law, the latest public policy item that’s now anathema to liberal America. Lyons would prefer his agents be unmasked, but he supported his rank-and-file over the threats they’re facing from white, unhinged progressives, notably those in Minneapolis, who are also calling black ICE agents the n-word and throwing sex toys at federal vehicles. Some even broke into FBI vans, stole documents, and stole AR-15 rifles. The hearing was one absurd moment after the next, but it also showed that the Democratic Party’s brain trust is no better than a yam. 

Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-MI) threatened to prosecute these men once Trump leaves office. That should be cut and used for ads, though subtitles will be needed since I can’t understand this clown. But that's also the grand plan post-Trump, which is to abolish ICE and prosecute top officials and agents for doing their job. It's lunacy. 

Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) acted like a typical Jersey Democrat—what the hell is this question, lady? McIver also assaulted an ICE agent last year.  

Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL) said the two men and their agencies were worse than the KKK and slave patrols, while Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) peddled the hoax that Liam Ramos was used as bait after being abandoned by his illegal alien father.

Oh, and Dem. Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) rehashed the fake AI-generated image of Alex Pretti’s shooting by federal immigration officers after the deranged, lefty, unemployed nurse interfered in a police action on January 24.  

We’re dealing with crazy people. Granted, it’s more entertainment at this point. If all they have is tossing out historically illiterate ramblings about how ICE is worse than the KKK, they have nothing. 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2026/02/10/the-house-homeland-security-committee-with-the-cbp-and-ice-chiefs-was-a-total-circus-n2671051?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Check Out the Hilarious Whiplash As Dems Flip-Flop on Bodycams When They Realize There's a Problem

Check Out the Hilarious Whiplash As Dems Flip-Flop on Bodycams When They Realize There's a Problem

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Remember how it was only about a week ago that the Democrats were losing their minds over the DHS part of the funding bill? 

One of the things they wanted was to have bodycams on ICE agents. It was the only one of the ideas that made any sense and wasn't ridiculous. So the DHS immediately went along with it. 

Listen to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) saying how important those bodycams are, while attacking Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

But once the DHS said they were going to immediately start using them, then that's when suddenly the Democrats realized there was a problem. That was too much transparency, according to Politico.

A push to put body cameras on all ICE agents has Democrats running headlong into a new problem: fear that the technology will provide another avenue for mass surveillance of protesters.

Congressional Democratic leaders have made universal use of body cameras one of their prime demands for imposing accountability on Immigration and Customs Enforcement, especially after federal agents fatally shot two American citizens in Minneapolis. But after an outcry from privacy advocates that surveillance tools will allow ICE agents to identify and track protesters, Democrats are also calling for restrictions on how the body cameras can be used.

Lawmakers and legal observers have accused ICE of leveraging a variety of cameras to surveil protesters, feeding pictures into license plate readers and facial recognition systems. Democrats now worry that the body cameras they’re demanding could be used for similar purposes.

Well, you were just demanding them, now you're complaining that it's "mass surveillance." 

Translation? The body cams aren't going to help their narrative of the "mostly peaceful protesters." They're going to show just how much these folks have been harassing and attacking ICE and other federal agents. 

It's because we have the ICE agent's video in the Renee Good case that we can see from his point of view what he had to deal with. Even with that, the Left is still trying to spin it. If we hadn't had that, though, they would have had much more ability to shape the narrative how they wanted. 

Yes, Democrats, the cameras are going to result in more arrests of folks on the Left because it's going to capture what they do, and video should be used to help identify them for arrest. If they're just protesting, they have nothing to worry about; it will show that too. It's funny, it sounds like Democrats are trying to argue that it should only be used for what they think it should be used for, not for real transparency that will show what happened, warts and all. They don't want it to be used to investigate these people.

But Democrats don't really want transparency.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2026/02/09/dems-and-the-flip-flop-on-bodycams-n2198962?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

9th Circuit Hands Trump Administration a Big Win With TPS Ruling

9th Circuit Hands Trump Administration a Big Win With TPS Ruling

AP Photo/Alex Brandon, Pool

The Trump administration scored another big win at the appellate court level on Monday, when the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay of a lower court ruling vacating Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem's termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations for Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua.

Multiple TPS cases are being litigated at present, and it's a bit challenging to keep them all straight, but this one, as noted, involves TPS designations for Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua. Sec. Noem terminated the TPS designations for all three countries in the summer of 2025. The plaintiffs sued to block that termination, and in late December, District Judge Trina Thompson (Northern District of California) determined that Noem's decisions violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and entered a judgment vacating the terminations. 

The administration appealed and, with Monday's ruling (viewable below), the 9th Circuit not only granted a stay pending appeal but struck at the very heart of a number of related rulings: 

We conclude that the government is likely to succeed on the merits of its appeal either by showing that the district court lacked jurisdiction or by prevailing on plaintiffs’ arbitrary-and-capricious APA challenge.


RELATED: Judge Makes Wildly Insane Ruling on Trump Revoking TPS - May Have Topped Planned Parenthood Absurdity

Shocker. Ninth Circuit Squashes Unhinged Ranting Opinion by Leftist Judge


The court distinguished this case, involving the termination of TPS, from its recent ruling in a case involving Noem's vacatur of a TPS designation, which found that she had exceeded her statutory authority. To put it simply, per the 9th Circuit, the applicable statute allows the DHS Secretary to terminate TPS designations, just not to vacate them. 

The court also found it likely that the administration will succeed on the merits of the APA claim, though one of the panel judges (Michael Hawkins, a Clinton appointee) felt it unnecessary to address the merits of the APA claim, though he agreed with the decision to grant the stay. (The other two panel judges, Consuello Callahan and Eric Miller, were appointed by Bush 43 and Trump, respectively.)

Of note, the court also pointed to recent Supreme Court stays issued in related cases as further support for its decision:

We are not writing on a blank slate, however, because the Supreme Court has twice stayed district court orders blocking the Secretary’s vacatur of TPS for Venezuela. See Noem v. National TPS All., 146 S. Ct. 23 (2025); Noem v. National TPS All., 145 S. Ct. 2728 (2025). Those orders contained no reasoning, so they do not inform our analysis of the legal issues in this case, and the issues in any event are not identical. But the stay applications involved similar assertions of harm by both parties, and we have been admonished that the Court’s stay orders must inform “how [we] should exercise [our] equitable discretion in like cases.” Trump v. Boyle, 145 S. Ct. 2653, 2654 (2025). We therefore conclude that the equitable factors favor a stay.

Plaintiffs, of course, may petition for a rehearing en banc, and there may be an appeal to the Supreme Court, but if they're banking on a win at SCOTUS, they may be out of luck.  

 TPS Decision 2-9-26  by  Susie Moore 

https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2026/02/09/9th-circuit-hands-trump-administration-a-big-win-with-tps-ruling-n2198988?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

CBS's Attempt to Attack President Trump's Deportation Project Gets Harsh Response from Homeland Security

CBS's Attempt to Attack President Trump's Deportation Project Gets Harsh Response from Homeland Security

AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura, File

The media are up to their old tricks and we're seeing that CBS, under the leadership of Bari Weiss (Is Bari Weiss Bringing Respectability Back to the Legacy Media? – RedState), isn't terribly less partisan than the CBS of Dan Rather. Perhaps a bit smoother and with fewer instances of hair on fire, but still anti-Trump, pro-illegals, and anti-American in leanings.

It is no secret that all "right-thinking" people, from Reason Magazine to Chuck Schumer, oppose Trump's policy of DEI, that is, Deport Every Illegal. I have to admit, I stole that one; the source is at the end of the post. There are a lot of reasons. Schumer is looking at the genocide of the Democrat party if the Supreme Court rules, as is expected, that carving up states into racial ghettos to achieve a certain number of minority members elected to office is an affront to the Fourteenth Amendment; see The Voting Rights Act Probably Won't Be 'Gutted,' but the Supreme Court Appears Set to Restrain It – RedState. There is overwhelming evidence that a significant number of illegals are registered to vote and vote in elections because the stupid "motor voter" laws don't require proof of citizenship. All you have to do is check a box, and some bored, time-serving functionary signs off on it. Illegals represent the future of the Democrat party.

Another claim, made in areas where ICE has a significant presence, is that immigration enforcement hurts business.

If you depend on illegals for either employees or customers, you, in my opinion, should be out of business. Of course, in Klobuchar's state, many of those endangered businesses are Somali-run fraud emporiums; see Does the Mounting Minnesota Fraud Scandal Explain the Curious Prominence of Some Minnesota Politicians? – RedStateMaine in the Crosshairs, As CMS Administrator Dr. Oz Goes Ham on Medicare Fraud – RedState, and SBA's Loeffler Suspends 111,620 California Businesses in $8.6 Billion Fraud Scam – RedState.

The line in the sand appeal is to fairness. Sure, they say, good ol' Juan is illegal and so is his whole family. But he works hard, and he's a good neighbor. There is no reason to deport his butt.

It is in the latter category that CBS News weighed in today: Less than 14% of those arrested by ICE in Trump's 1st year back in office had violent criminal records, document shows - CBS News.

Less than 14% of nearly 400,000 immigrants arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in President Trump's first year back in the White House had charges or convictions for violent criminal offenses, according to an internal Department of Homeland Security document obtained by CBS News.

The official statistics contained in the DHS document, which had not been previously reported publicly, provide the most detailed look yet into who ICE has arrested during the Trump administration's far-reaching deportation operations across the U.S.

Okay, that's still 60,000 violent felons no longer in our communities.

It goes on to say, "The internal DHS figures undermine frequent assertions by the Trump administration that its crackdown on illegal immigration is primarily targeting dangerous and violent criminals living in the U.S. illegally, people Mr. Trump and his lieutenants have regularly called  the 'worst of the worst.'"  

Even at this, CBS makes this admission, so perhaps Weiss has had an impact: "Nearly 60% of ICE arrestees over the past year had criminal charges or convictions, the document indicates. But among that population, the majority of the criminal charges or convictions are not for violent crimes."

Even by CBS's own numbers, the data show conclusively that ICE is primarily targeting charged and convicted criminals. Somehow, they've decided that "non-violent" felons violate President Trump's policy statement, but that is a bizarre reading of his words.

This caught the attention of the Department of Homeland Security, and Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin responded. By the way, if you don't follow McLaughlin's personal account on X, you are really missing it.

Drug trafficking, Distribution of child pornography, burglary, fraud, DUI, embezzlement, solicitation of a minor, human smuggling are all categorized as “non violent crimes.”  

Like we said, ~70% of those illegal aliens arrested under @POTUS Trump and @Sec_Noem have pending criminal charges or prior convictions.

Throw into that mix guys who are arrested and handed over to ICE without criminal charges, and there is no doubt that the lion's share of involuntary deportees are criminals of some variety, and being a drug pusher rather than an armed robber doesn't constitute a "get out of jail free" card.

What CBS is trying to do is generate sympathy for illegals. There is much here that is reminiscent of the heyday of the three-strikes laws in the early 1990s. Empirically, incarcerating three-time felons reduced crime. That isn't debatable. So the media attacked the laws, successfully, I might add, by stories like "Joe Bob is going to prison for life for stealing a slice of pizza."  Even though Joe Bob pushed a kid off his bike and took the pizza from him. Empirically, deporting illegals reduces crime, reduces rents, and increases the employment of American citizens. That really can't be denied. So the media are now attacking the entire idea of deporting non-violent felons and mere border-jumpers because it isn't fair.

As if to put a red flag on the objective of the article, it says, "A CBS News poll last month found that Americans' support for Mr. Trump's deportation efforts had fallen to 46%, down from 59% at the start of his second term. Just over 60% of those surveyed said immigration agents were being 'too tough...'"

Here's the bottom line. I really don't care. I want every illegal gone. Ideally, they'll leave with a free plane ticket and $2,600 of my kids' inheritance in their pockets, but if they have to leave in handcuffs and leg irons, I'm fine with that, too. I'd rather that first priority be given to violent felons, but I also believe we can walk and chew gum at the same time. 

I promised you where I stole the DEI snark. Here's the link; the tweet will not embed for some totally unsuspicious reason.

https://redstate.com/streiff/2026/02/09/cbss-attempt-to-attack-president-trumps-deportation-project-gets-harsh-response-from-homeland-security-n2198973?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

JONATHAN TURLEY: Grandstanding Newsom will stop at nothing to ride the rails to glory in 2028

JONATHAN TURLEY: Grandstanding Newsom will stop at nothing to ride the rails to glory in 2028

California governor uses diesel freight train on conventional track to create appearance of progress on high-speed rail boondoggle

Jonathan Turley  

Gavin Newsom's $15B 'Train to Nowhere'

Fox News' Jesse Watters criticizes Dem California Gov. Gavin Newsom's video announcing construction of California's high-speed rail beginning construction after over a decade and $15 billion spent.

In the dystopian novel "1984,"  George Orwell wrote, "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." 

The true meaning of that line was never more clear than watching the truly bizarre photo op of Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom heralding the success of the greatest boondoggle in history: his high-speed train to nowhere. 

Without laying a single yard of track after burning $12 billion, Newsom showed a diesel freight train on a conventional track to create the appearance of a working railroad.

I have been writing about this boondoggle for years. Newsom promised years ago that the project would be transformative. It was, but not as he promised.

Voters approved a $9.95 billion bond issue in 2008 after absurdly low estimates of the projected cost. Influential figures and companies stood to make a fortune, and the key was to secure a "buy-in" worth billions, so that it would become increasingly difficult to abandon the project as overruns and delays sent costs soaring.

Now the official estimate of future ridership has dropped by 25%, and it demands billions more to complete a project delayed by decades. Remember that this entire project was meant to create a rail line of only 171 miles. It is projected to exceed $128 billion and could ultimately cost a billion dollars per mile. There are still uncompleted environmental assessments and challenging rail lines through the mountains.

There is still no train and not a yard of track almost 20 years later.

The state's inspector general, Benjamin Belnap, issued a scathing report on the first phase of the still uncompleted project.  That is only the stretch from Merced to Bakersfield which was supposed to be completed by 2033. 

Belnap wrote, "With a smaller remaining schedule envelope and the potential for significant uncertainty and risk during subsequent phases of the project, staying within the 2033 schedule envelope is unlikely. In fact, uncertainty about some parts of the project has increased as the authority has recently made decisions that deviated from the procurement and funding strategies that were part of its plans for staying on schedule."

Rather than deliver on the promise of high-speed rail from Los Angeles to San Francisco, the Merced-Bakersfield line would now cost $35.3 billion, exceeding the 2008 projection for a complete system.

'The Daily Show' hammers 'leading man' Gavin Newsom on homelessness, high-speed railVideo

Merced and Bakersfield have a combined population of just 500,000 for the most expensive rail project in the state's history.

However, Newsom still wants to be president, even as citizens are fleeing his state in record numbers. The "train to nowhere" is a problem. Even The New York Times is writing editorials on whether Newsom will be the next mistake of the Democratic Party.

Newsom's response is to arrange for gushing columns like Maya Singer's embarrassing piece in Vogue: "Let’s get this out of the way: He is embarrassingly handsome, his hair seasoned with silver, at ease with his own eminence as he delivers his final State of the State address.

"Newsom’s lanky frame was folded onto a sofa a bit too low-slung for him. This made him lean back — away from me. Or it could be that his body language had nothing to do with ergonomics and is a function of Newsom’s quality of being at once gregarious and aloof."

It is the type of teenybopper heartthrob coverage that Newsom is counting on from the media. It is not the billions burned on a non-existent railway but his glorious hair and "eminence."


However, others beyond Vogue readers may be interested in his actual record. Hence, the need to release this absurd photo op that would make a propagandist blush.

"All of the hard work behind us. Now we’re going to see the fruits of that. We’re going to start seeing precisely what you see here. Real tracks, real progress."

Merced and Bakersfield have a combined population of just 500,000 for the most expensive rail project in the state's history.

It is like paying for a meal at a restaurant and the chef charging you ten times what was on the menu, not producing the meal for hours and then showing you a picture of a different dish as a sign of his progress.

The difference is that Newsom has taken almost two decades to deliver and cut the original dish to a fraction of its original size while increasing the price exponentially.

Californians are now captives on a train to nowhere. The state must continue to burn billions because too much is invested economically and politically. They must ride the train with Gavin Newsom to the very end.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/jonathan-turley-grandstanding-newsom-stop-nothing-ride-rails-glory-2028

Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things

Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things

AP Photo/Allison Robbert

Since the Olympics are happening, Meet the Press was preempted – because, if it’s Sunday, it’s Meet the Press…unless they have something better to run. That freed up Adam Schiff to go on This Week with Jeffrey Epstein’s good friend, George Stephanopoulos. Why? Because he’s what is called in the business “A good b*********r.”

If being a creepy jackass caused cancer, Adam Schiff would be smoking in human form; he’d be the equivalent of chewing asbestos. Host Jon Karl gave Schiff a verbal massage on the level of what you’d expect on a gay OnlyFans page – asking only one question that could be considered “from the right” about why Adam doesn’t support voter ID. When Schiff refused to answer, instead defaulting to the Democrat idea that black people are too stupid to prove they are American citizens, Karl let it go because of “journalism.”

The next segment was about a “racist” video Trump tweeted out because someone made the Obamas into monkeys, along with a whole bunch of other politicians. I really couldn’t care less about it, but I do find it funny that Johnny Karl lets slide the idea that black people couldn’t possibly be expected to live up to the standards of white or Asian people, because it helps Democrats, then wets himself over a snippet of a video because Democrats declared THAT to be racist.

You have to wonder if these people even listen to themselves? There weren’t any questions for Schiff about his close friend, big donor and bringer of death to young black men, Ed Buck, that would challenge the left-wing orthodoxy. If you watched the interview, you would be justified in thinking that Karl and Schiff were on the same team…mostly because they are.

I’m not a violent person. If there were a charity event where you could attempt to smack the smug off the faces of those two, I’d mortgage my house…

Then again, we could pay off the national debt if there were an arrangement like that with nearly every Member of Congress or the media.

As these people soil their sheets over the idea of people losing their jobs at the Washington Post, ask yourself if you remember anything close to that level of concern when normal people lost their jobs? If a factory closing under a Democrat administration even made the news, it was less than 30 seconds and done, like I must imagine the torture Mrs. Schiff or Karl go through once a month. (At least it’s over quickly, the poor ladies.)

Yes, 300 people lost their jobs at the Post, mostly because the public wasn’t interested in what they were doing. The book section? Is someone entitled to a job for their entire life because they held it for a while? The sports section? Why pay someone to go cover the Olympics when you can find out what happened immediately via social media?

Would the world be better if we reverted to simpler times when people read the newspaper? Probably, but it’s not going to happen, and the news in those papers is propaganda anyway. I don’t like to see people lose their jobs, but I also can’t care.

The people in the media are either bad at their jobs or bad people (sometimes both).

In the “round table,” Donna Brazile pretended to be “sad” about the “racist” video, Chris Christie pretended to be so upset by it that he could only eat two pounds of bacon that morning, the poor dear.

Ask yourself this question: Who was the last person in the media you thought worth their weight in anything, be it gold or dog excrement? Is there anyone in the media you’d suspect would throw you anything other than a brick, were you drowning? Why wouldn’t you return that attitude?

These people are gross, and they’re bad people, they genuinely are. Why should anyone care what happens to them on any level, in any corner of the globe?

The fact is, you should not. Don’t cheer bad things – from the newsroom clearing out at the Post, to the deaths of morons trying to run over or fight with ICE agents. Yes, it’s impossible to get worked up over someone burning their hand by touching a hot stove – what did these idiots think would happen? – but you don’t have to cheer it.

Then again, Democrats have burned the rule book, along with all societal norms and nearly all things considered decent in America, so maybe they deserve that too.

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2026/02/09/democrats-have-earned-all-the-bad-things-n2670937?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-zXeyyHpgwq&_nlid=zXeyyHpgwq&_nhids=nc1pYua5uz4kls