Thursday, August 13, 2026

Election Analyst Throws Much-Needed Cold Water on the Panican Vibes Ahead of the 2026 Election

Election Analyst Throws Much-Needed Cold Water on the Panican Vibes Ahead of the 2026 Election

by Matt Vespa

Election Analyst Throws Much-Needed Cold Water on the Panican Vibes Ahead of the 2026 Election
AP Photo/José Luis Villegas, Pool, File

Everyone needs to stop being panicans. That’s the first rule. The second is to look toward the future because 2026 isn’t the last American election. The liberal media would like to think that any time Trump is in the mix, it is, but that’s not the case. Sadly, Trump is going to leave the Oval Office, despite my wanting him to stay for a third term, but you can’t always get what you want — an axiom liberals seldom understand. I bring all this up because the summer polls are out. They’re a little late this year, but hoo boy, do we have the same clown falling for the same games in the dog days of summer. 

Seth Keshel has been firefighting, mainly from people who believe an early August poll is a final decision-maker on how these races will turn out. We face a tight midterm election, which is bad news for Democrats. With gerrymandering and ongoing branding and messaging issues for liberals, along with primaries that have propelled extreme candidates to the brink of office, the DSA and liberal America could see election night 2026 end with Republicans still in control of Congress.

Now, suppose things go slightly sideways. For starters, Sen. John Thune and the Senate Republicans are going to regret the day they didn’t grow a pair, nuke the filibuster, and pass the SAVE America Act. That’s over. Second, House Democrats aren’t going to impeach Trump; they’re going to investigate him — he’s the most investigated man in American presidential history — and then move to impeach him. Or they might just do the former, use process as the punishment, and then falter when pressed about why they aren’t doing anything about affordability, which they’re complaining about this cycle.

Keshel had a great post to dispel the ‘sky is falling’ vibe and emphasize the positive future for Republicans. If they regain the House, let Democrats think they’ve won the final victory because they haven’t. They’re going to lose the war. He referenced Ronald Reagan as an example, who many thought in 1983 was going to be a one-term president:

Simply put, when Americans voted for a political revolution and won, they didn’t vote for a 35% approval rating and they sure as hell didn’t come out in droves just so the Republican Party could get shellacked in the very next midterms. They were told about America’s decline, viewed that fateful quadrennial presidential election as a last ditch effort to reverse course peacefully in America, and responded with a popular vote win that featured Republican presidential victories in:

  • Arizona
  • Michigan
  • Nevada
  • Pennsylvania
  • Wisconsin

…and blowouts in Texas, Florida, and Ohio. This unrelenting base was ready to crawl over shattered glass and gas station bathrooms to vote for a man who became the oldest president of all time upon inauguration. That old man could have enjoyed his fame in retirement, but chose to step into a toxic arena and wear every label, accusation, and slander imaginable and even survived an assassin’s bullet.

[…]

My assumption is that you had no idea I was talking about President Ronald Reagan’s administration and the beating the Republicans received in 1982.

Yes, indeed - at the start of 1983, right after the Democrats cleaned House, President Reagan held a 35% approval rating.

[…]

…what if the Democrats win the midterms?

What if they do? I mean, 92 years of history show me that the president’s party loses seats in the U.S. House 20 out of 23 times since 1934. This year, believe it or not, affords one of the highest chances of president-party success since the dawn of the New Deal era, and it’s entirely owed to redistricting. Republicans aren’t going to win the Congressional popular vote, but they may be able to pull an inside straight

[…]

If Democrats win the House, which I would give them 60/40 odds to do today, then there will be pain. There will be committees formed and inquiries ordered, and crappy people assigned important positions of influence and power. They will drag their political enemies in front of cameras and excoriate them, and unlike Republicans, deal out legitimate consequences.

And in doing so, they will remind America why they can’t be trusted with power, why voter registration constantly moves against them, and exactly why they should forget the early struggles of the Trump 47 administration that aren’t really the fault of his policies. Economic ships take a long time to turn around, global enemies left unaddressed for 5 decades don’t simply leave power in a span of months, and the enemy wants to win, too.

Like we Christians say on Easter: Satan thought he had it won on Friday, but Sunday is coming.

The 2030 census is coming. The emergence of the DSA is already coming. The truth will win out, but only if the people who desire to see it in real, living color in our lives get off their dead asses, log off the internet, and get busy building the relationships that matter and pushing the good people they know to take over school boards, counties, and beyond.

He adds that GOP voter registration dumps are outstanding in a year that should be a blue wave for Democrats, though the instant access to information has led to the good, the bad, and the very ugly (fake news) getting digested. We’ve all fallen victim to it at some point. It’s exacerbated by a network of paid influencers who farm engagement and, well, it spreads faster than COVID. Guys, this is a marathon, not a sprint.

You know a lot of this already. 

Keshel also explored why Trump valued the late Lindsey Graham despite major policy disagreements, especially on immigration. It’s because Graham, as we’ve learned from his passing, got things done. He was a vital link between the Senate GOP and the White House, had the gift of gab that at least gave him a chance at bipartisan cooperation, particularly on procedural hurdles, and kept many pieces of legislation from falling apart. Keshel mentioned budgets — Graham prevented the big, beautiful bill from going off the rails. He was irreplaceable, at least for now. Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) has done some great behind-the-scenes work, but she still has a long way to go before she reaches Graham’s levels of efficiency and experience. Not a knock on her, but she’s young. His point: like the late Mr. Graham, there is only one Trump. Who will replace him? Well, for now, Keshel thinks it should be us, at the very least, doing small things to “provide aid to those who stand for what is right.”

Oh, man, how the Left will hate that sort of political dispersion. 

He ended his post noting that Reagan won in 1984 by a landslide, with the GOP winning 89 of 100 states in both the ’84 and ’88 cycles. We’re the only party to achieve a three-peat for the White House. Things bounce back, opinions change, which is why there are no permanent victories in our system of government. Demography is not destiny. Yes, the golden age is here, and the future is still bright. And while not entirely the cause of it, the Democrats’ lurch toward authoritarian leftism, driven mainly by Trump and shifts in their base, aligns with a timeline that shows a last gasp, if you will, of their relevance in national elections for a long time. In a last-gasp situation, politicos will do almost anything to hold onto power. But that could change. For now, Democrats seem to be allowing hammers and sickles into the tent. These people have an agenda that’s shielded by affordability talking points, but after that, it’s crackpot city. It’s unsustainable; it’s short-term. 

That is not the way. 

https://townhall.com/news/mattvespa/2026/08/11/commentator-says-to-focus-on-this-ahead-of-the-2026-midterms-and-uses-a-great-example-n2681016?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-Yb4ZHSdDxT&utm_term=&_nlid=Yb4ZHSdDxT&_nhids=nc1pYuZLiz4kls

Journos Aren't Quick to Share a Couple Details While Hyperventilating About Being Used As Decoys

Journos Aren't Quick to Share a Couple Details While Hyperventilating About Being Used As Decoys

Gif screenshot from Gone with the Wind

You won't be surprised to know that there are "journalists" doing the thing where they make everything about themselves again.

Yesterday Brett wrote about journalists and other Democrats who are clutching pearls over what happened recently in Turkey:

The big news on X today isn't that it's Election Day in several key states, but that President Donald Trump pulled the old switcheroo on a flight from Turkey, boarding Air Force One in full view of cameras, slipping out the far side into a catering truck, and transferring to another military transport. This was all done due to a credible assassination threat from Iran, and as our own Sam J. reported earlier, CNN's Jake Tapper took great offense that White House staffers and reporters were left on Trump's death jet.

The story: Iran had a serious plot to kill the president while he was overseas.

Media headlines: OMG Secret Service prioritized protecting the president and not every member of the press who was tagging along.

Reporters seem shocked to learn that the Secret Service's job is to protect the president and not all the press that travels with him. 

Many reporters use themselves as decoys all the time because they hope we mistake them for actual journalists instead of the propagandists they really are.

An argument could be made that the regime would have no interest in taking out many of the "journalists" who are parroting Iranian state media in the U.S. and helping spread their propaganda. 

Watching "journalists" find out in real time that the Secret Service prioritizes the president over reporters has been amazing.

You'll also notice that nobody above mentioned this:

Next up Tapper and the rest will be reporting, "yeah, but Rubio and Bessent both had parachutes and reporters didn't." 

https://twitchy.com/dougp/2026/08/12/a-couple-details-journos-arent-quick-to-share-while-hyperventilating-about-being-used-as-decoys-n2431196?utm_source=twdailyamvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Young People Got Shafted and Need to Suck It Up

Young People Got Shafted and Need to Suck It Up

by Kurt Schlichter

Young People Got Shafted and Need to Suck It Up
AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File

I identify as Gen X even though I was technically born in the last week of the Baby Boom, and my generational cohort is taking a lot of grief from a lot of young people — by whom I mean anybody not of driving age when 9/11 happened. The rap is this: the older folks rigged the game and, to the extent they have gotten out of the way (Boomers being accused of selfishly clinging to power, prestige, and position long after their sell-by date), we have left subsequent generations an economic Schiff sandwich. Some of this critique is justified — those kooky kids today are right that they got served up an unprecedented set of obstacles and challenges to success. But us crusties have a point too: if you’re regularly dropping your cash on the proverbial $20 burrito, you’re doing money management wrong.

Basically, things fiscally suck for young people, but things have always fiscally sucked for young people, and the only way through it is through it.

When we hear younger folk complain how everything sucks, our usual move is to explain how things sucked for us. And things did suck for us. I was making $3.10 an hour mopping out the stalls at the Foster City Carl’s Jr. in 1981. I moved up in the world across the street to McDonald’s, where I slung Big Macs for $3.35 an hour. I got fired from Denny’s along the way for gross incompetence. And in 1988, I was pulling in $1,286.10 a month as a second lieutenant. I did freelance writing in the ’90s and wrote trivia questions and jokes for bar trivia games. I built a law firm after leaving a bigger law firm — I brought in Circuit City as a client as a second-year lawyer and got offered the same bonus of $500 as the associate they caught sleeping under his desk; my counteroffer was that I keep everything. What that meant was long hours, risk, and that everyone else got paid before I did. If we didn’t make money one month, I didn’t make money. And I was a reservist during that time, and my active duty did not count (one weekend a month and two weeks a year, my rear end — I ended up deploying for 16 months after 9/11, plus mobilizations for riots, fires, earthquakes, plagues of frogs, and O.J.). Eventually I was doing multiple gigs at once — lawyering, soldiering, stand-up comedy, and then writing, first for Andrew Breitbart, then here at Townhall, and also pumping out books (like my latest novel, “American Warlord,” out for presale now).

My purpose here is not to demonstrate the awesomeness that is Kurt; it’s to show that I worked a lot. I missed important stuff. I did not take vacations. I drove a used Volvo. It was 2005 before I paid off my student loans. I, and once I got married, we sacrificed a lot of the fun we saw friends having for our long-term goals. I did not buy $20 burritos; I still don’t. But one day, you get to a place where a $1,500 surprise transmission fix is not going to send you into a tailspin. So when I presume to offer my insights into getting your life into fiscal order, I did it. But none of this means young people today have it easy. It means no one had it easy. No one gave us anything, and no one is going to give young people everything. But none of that means that their complaints do not have some basic legitimacy. Take student loans — please. I used the GI Bill to pay some of my school, but I still walked out with about $70,000. It was doable; it never occurred to me that I should palm off the education that gave me the ability to practice law on the taxpayers. But the truth is that gullible young people got told that they should run up $200K to get a degree in Trans-curious Ecuadorian Interpretive Dance. And then they found that a barista’s salary — because they have no other saleable skills — isn’t going to service that debt. Imagine a six-figure millstone hung around your neck when you are just starting out with no upside that allows you to earn it off. Sure, they signed on the line that was dotted, but there is such a thing as joint and several liability; the system our generation put in place is liable as well.

And there are other problems. Inflation from the Biden era, along with the much smaller but still significant consequences of tariffs and Iran (both of which have a point, but require some sacrifice), means the dollars the kids make don’t stretch. We could go out in our 20s and get $2 beers; a couple of beers today is now over $20, and that’s unsustainable. No wonder the birthrate is dropping; the kids can’t go out and meet mates without taking out a mortgage. Moreover, there’s unfair competition, and our generation allowed it. We told the kids to go learn to code, to do the STEM thing, and then we allowed zillions of foreigners in on H-1B visas (or with no visa at all) into the country to provide a cheap serf class for the corporations. We priced the young people out of the market — I wasn’t competing with thousands of dudes from Goatbangistan when I was coming up. And a guy like me could get a job. DEI fascism has disenfranchised the male-identifying people o’ pallor; it was Jim Crow, except for honkies. And yes, rent and houses are expensive, but they were for us, too.

All this adds up to real problems for young people. There are some who think they should be living like their parents the day after they toss their mortarboard at their graduation from the University of College. Some believe that they can buy a daily $8.50 half-decaf half-espresso mocha macchiato every morning, and that’s just not so. When you’re young, you have no money. We didn’t; they won’t either, and to the extent they are bitching about that, well, talk to the hand. But our generation did do some damage, and we need to fix it. How? Here’s a non-exclusive list:

  • End the student loan scam. Government-guaranteed student loans let colleges raise their prices because they don’t care — they always get their money. They need skin in the game to incentivize them to stop scamming credulous kids.
  • Deport the illegal aliens and free up housing and jobs.
  • No more H-1B visas. Why are we importing foreigners when our own young people are sending out a thousand resumes and getting maybe one interview?
  • Totally eradicate DEI and demand pure merit as the only criterion. The deliberate discrimination against the non-diverse must end. The best should prevail, be it a cisgender male who makes Mitt Romney look ethnic or a lesbian Hindu of color with a limp.

But while we can fix some structural problems, here’s the hard truth. It’s always tough starting out. It always will be. You get nothing for free; if you want the Instagram fantasy life, you have to work for it. We get that there are obstacles. We get that there are challenges. We understand that there are things our generation did that need to be undone. But at the end of the day, what is going to make the difference is hard work and sacrifice. We need to get out of its way, but there’s no scenario where the younger generation gets anything handed to it. And that means maybe boiling up some ramen during your 20s instead of DoorDashing those $20 burritos.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2026/08/10/young-people-got-shafted-and-need-to-suck-it-up-n2680923?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-eNUp78f6FX&utm_term=&_nlid=eNUp78f6FX&_nhids=nczGeHMkh4e8ls

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Michigan Socialist Slams Trump’s 'Rocky' Marriage to Melania After Viral Photo

Michigan Socialist Slams Trump’s 'Rocky' Marriage to Melania After Viral Photo

AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

President Trump stirred the pot this weekend simply by posting a few photos and a catchphrase.

The first photo was one of himself with First Lady Melania Trump. Next to it was the photo of Michigan Democrat Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed with his wife, Sarah Jukaku.

His caption? “Two VERY DIFFERENT America’s.”

Trump didn't explain what he meant, which is probably for the best.

But the photograph of El-Sayed and his wife immediately drew attention because Jukaku, a psychiatrist and fellow physician, is pictured wearing a hijab.

El-Sayed, who was born in Michigan to Egyptian immigrant parents and would become the first Muslim U.S. senator if elected, is running as an unapologetic socialist.

Was Trump commenting on religion? Immigration? Assimilation? Culture? Politics? The hijab? All of the above? He didn't say.


READ MORE: Kamala's Bizarre Remarks About 'Ruthlessness' Set Off Some Alarm Bells


El-Sayed nevertheless decided to answer the provocation during an appearance Sunday on CNN's “State of the Union,” and instead of leaving Melania out of it, he went straight after the Trumps' marriage.

“Actually, Sarah and I like each other,” El-Sayed told Jake Tapper. “I don’t know about the first lady and the president, but, from what I have heard, it’s a bit of a rocky road.”

Well, obvious lies aside, that’s a pretty good glimpse at what Michiganders will get if they elect this clown. Alinsky tactics instead of policy solutions. Trump obviously gave El-Sayed the opening with the photo post, and he responds by taking a shot at his marriage.

America is heading into uncharted waters where there is no such thing as “class.”

But more importantly, El-Sayed agreed, somewhat sarcastically, that the two couples represent competing visions of America.

“Yeah, he’s right — you’ve got two different visions of America — one in which your overlords are two people who don’t like each other but joint in the interest of making billions of dollars off of you,” he said.

His alternative was himself and his wife: “two people who genuinely love each other, enjoyed some pancakes together, want to come together to build the kind of America where they can raise a family.”

Sure, because open borders, abolishing the police, and letting violent criminals onto the street are “keeping America safe.” He might want to read the not-so-fine-print on his DSA platform guide.

The swipe at Melania is interesting because we've been watching this same tired routine for years. The lefty press has been fascinated with the unfounded notion that Donald and Melania Trump secretly despise one another.

Breathless stories have gone viral in lefty media due to speculation about the Trumps’ facial expressions, hand gestures, whether she was sufficiently affectionateyada yada yada. Less work was spent analyzing the Zapruder film.

There was even the bizarre recurring “Fake Melania” conspiracy theory claiming Trump occasionally used a body double in place of his wife.

Then there was the much more serious Epstein episode. Melania Trump threatened legal action in 2025 after reports repeated allegations concerning how she met Donald Trump and attempted to connect her personal history to Jeffrey Epstein.

The Daily Beast ultimately retracted an article based on claims made by Michael Wolff and apologized after receiving a legal challenge from Melania's attorneys.


READ MORE: Trump's America First Economy: Foreign-Born See Massive Job Losses, Native-Born Make Big-Time Gains


Hunter Biden also repeated allegations about Epstein supposedly introducing the Trumps, prompting Melania's attorney to demand that he retract the statements and apologize while threatening litigation seeking more than $1 billion in damages.

So El-Sayed isn't exactly wandering into unexplored territory here. Going after the Trump marriage has practically become its own political-media genre.

But there may be something more interesting happening underneath all the cheap shots.

Trump chose the words “two very different Americas,” not “two very different marriages.”

And whatever he personally intended, the image lands in the middle of a much larger argument about the direction of the country.

For years, the United States experienced enormous immigration levels while politicians and corporations increasingly presented America less as a historically rooted nation and more as an economic and geographic space into which practically anybody could arrive.

Trump is posting a not-so-subtle rejection of that idea. His administration has dramatically reduced illegal border crossings, increased deportations, and put assimilation, citizenship, and American national identity back at the center of immigration policy.

The Democrat Party's ascendant socialist wing is moving in the exact opposite direction. And El-Sayed is one of the new poster children for this DSA-driven agenda. His politics are taken straight from the socialist playbook on healthcare, taxes, immigration, and the idea that America's institutions need to be completely overhauled.

So, their “machismo politics” are a superficial skirmish masking a serious political fight. It’s really a crass version of Sun Tzu’s "Art of War." This is the brilliant way Trump has steered political debates onto his own preferred terrain.

Trump posts a picture. El-Sayed insults Trump's marriage. Everybody gets mad.

While everybody is arguing about whether Trump and Melanie actually have a good marriage, Americans are thinking: Wait, what kind of America do I really want to live in?

https://redstate.com/kyle-becker/2026/08/10/michigan-socialist-slams-trumps-rocky-marriage-to-melania-after-photo-comparison-n2205403?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl