Wednesday, June 17, 2026

A New Study Just Confirmed the Left's Worst-Kept Secret

A New Study Just Confirmed the Left's Worst-Kept Secret

It's an older meme but it checks out.

If you've spent any time arguing with liberals online, you already know this. Now there's a study to prove it.

Decades of research have shown that political conservatives report better mental health and greater happiness than their counterparts on the left. A new study published in the journal Political Behavior takes that finding a step further, finding that “mental illness is emerging as its own political identity and is most heavily aligned with leftist political ideology and causes,” and that it clusters heavily among younger, far-left Americans.

Shocking, I know.

Columbia University's magazine noted back in 2023 that "American adults who identify as politically liberal have long reported lower levels of happiness and psychological well-being than conservatives.” However, researchers spent years scratching their heads over why. Scholars from the Universities of Florida and Toronto eventually took a crack at it, drawing on four separate studies. Their conclusion? Conservatives tend to have greater personal agency, religiosity, moral clarity, a positive outlook, and stronger self-worth… which are traits consistently linked to resilience and mental health. In other words, having a sense of purpose and taking responsibility for your life is good for you. Who knew?

Professor Lauren Van De Hey of Utah State University has conducted research that connects the mental health gap directly to political identity formation. Her findings were drawn from the 2022 Cooperative Election Study, a large, nationally representative survey administered by YouGov.

"I further find that there is an emerging mental health political identity that is most pronounced among younger (Gen Z) and more liberal Americans," Van De Hey said.

Roughly half of the study participants who identified as having a mental illness said that identity was very important or somewhat important to them personally. Yeah, that's a voting bloc in the making.

Van De Hey also found that mental health identity operates differently in politics than physical disability or serious physical illness. "I find that the political predictors and political consequences for the emerging mental health identity differ from those for physical disability and serious physical illness categorization and identification," she said. The implication is clear: mental health struggles, increasingly worn as badges of identity, carry huge political weight.

ICYMI: Bakari Sellers Calls Elon Musk a White Supremacist, and All Hell Breaks Loose

The study also found that conservatives are less likely than liberals to categorize anxiety and depression as mental health conditions and report seeking treatment at lower rates. Van De Hey attributes this to a "personal responsibility ethos: they do not seek help when they think they can resolve the issues on their own." The left will frame that as denial. Conservatives will frame it as actually handling your problems. You can decide which sounds healthier.

Gee, who would have guessed that the same political movement that spent years turning gender into a political identity is now running the same play with mental illness?

Van De Hey's study draws that connection explicitly, pointing to gender politics as a precedent for how subjective personal struggles can become major political drivers. Make no mistake about it, this is by design. The left has a formula, and they're running it again and again.

Her conclusions don't sugarcoat what's coming, either. "These findings have far-reaching consequences for mental health advocacy, and the role mental health identity will play in the political sphere — especially as Gen Z matures as a cohort," she wrote. And she's right, though probably not in the way she intends. When emotional struggles become the foundation of political organizing, the incentive structure flips. You don't get better outcomes. You get a movement with every reason to keep people anxious, dependent, and radicalized.

And you wonder why leftists are so crazy?

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/06/14/a-new-study-just-confirmed-the-lefts-worst-kept-secret-n4953961?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-xjpCamnGGQ&utm_term=&_nlid=xjpCamnGGQ&_nhids=ncBXkIXMCMngls

The Karmelo Anthony Problem

The Karmelo Anthony Problem

Left, Karmello Anthony, Collin County Jail/Right, Austin Metcalf, family handout

On April 2, 2025, Karmelo Anthony went to Memorial High School looking for a fight. Though he was participating in a track meet, he felt the need to bring a knife in his backpack. Once at the school, he sat in the tent of the opposing team. When confronted by Austin Metcalf, who told him to leave, Anthony reached into his backpack and said, “Touch me and see what happens.” Metcalf then grabbed Anthony in an attempt to forcibly move him out of the tent. Anthony then used his knife to stab Metcalf in the heart, killing him almost instantly.

Touch me and see what happens. This is the ethos for which Anthony was willing to murder an innocent boy.

On paper, Anthony sounded as if he were a model citizen with a bright future. Coming from a stable, two-parent household, he was the captain of his own school’s track and football teams. He worked two part-time jobs and was a straight A student. At the time of his crime, he was a month away from graduation, and was planning on going to college. Until the moment he plunged his knife into Metcalf’s chest, he had never had any incidents with law enforcement.

What are we to make of this? How are we supposed to understand how someone as seemingly normal as Karmelo Anthony was willing, in a manner of seconds, to destroy the lives of others, not to mention his own life, over such a petty argument?

Touch me and see what happens. Anthony didn’t develop this ethos on his own. There is a sickness in black subculture in contemporary America, and the sickness is this: Too many young black males are immersed in a socio-racial ideology that glorifies violence, preaches that only the meanest dog on the block wins, and dictates that any perceived threat from anyone who “steps up to me” must be countered with a wildly disproportionate, overwhelming response.

With regards to this latter point, the sole purpose of a disproportionate, overwhelming response is to serve as a warning not only to the victim, but to whoever else is watching or who is later made aware of this incident. If pushing me results in me murdering you, people far and wide will think twice before “stepping up” to me. My reputation as an unpredictable, uncontrollable animal is forged and serves my interests in the long run, even if I’m punished in the short run.

Let us be honest. This sickness is prevalent among young black males more than any other group. The statistics don’t lie. And because of this sickness, and because of foot soldiers such as Karmelo Anthony willing to follow its orders, the result will likewise be predictable. People avoid sickness. And though Anthony will spend the next 35 years in quarantine, so to speak, there are still potentially millions of other infected carriers.

This sickness is evident in the Black Lives Matter riots that burned down entire cities and left dozens of innocent people dead. The sickness is evident in the almost exclusively black flash mobs that take over streets, malls, and beaches. The sickness is evident in the 20-person brawls that break out at Waffle Houses, in casino lobbies, and in Carnival cruise check-in lines. The sickness is evident in every attempt to resist law enforcement, and every escalation of a situation that in no way necessitated escalating. The sickness is evident in the Treyvon Martins and Eric Garners and Michael Browns and Jacob Blakes and Anton Sterlings who respond to any and all adversity with hyper-aggressive violence.

Whatever may be the incidental motivations for these crimes, underlying them is the darker, subconscious message. Don’t come near me. I’m not rational, and you can’t talk me down. I’m a rabid pit bull, and the more you anger me, the harder I’ll stomp you. I don’t follow rules, and you’d be wise to just stay out of my way.

This sickness festers like gangrene and rots the entire subculture, regardless of its other admirable components. A toxic mixture of never-ending racial grievance and a perverse pride in the urban “gangsta” lifestyle incubates, encourages, and spreads it. It’s the pathetic selfies holding the handgun in one hand and a wad of money in the other. It’s the bass-bumping car stereos through the neighborhood at midnight. It’s the infantile “statement” clothing, assuming it’s the correct size.

The problem with this messaging, aimed primarily if not exclusively toward the “white” dominant culture, is that the message is received exactly as intended. Don’t go near him. He’s not rational, and I can’t talk him down. He’s a rabid pit bull, and the more I anger him, the harder he’ll stomp me. He doesn’t follow rules, and I’d be wise to just stay out of his way.

And so, because of the Karmelo Anthonys and Treyvon Martins and Michael Browns, all black men are implicated. That’s obscenely unfair to innocent black men, but it’s also an unavoidable reaction of human beings. A black man in the Reconstruction South in the 1870’s would understandably avoid gatherings of young, loud, boisterous white men, especially at night. And it wouldn’t be because that black man was “racist.” It would be because enough gatherings of young white men had resulted in death or serious bodily injury for black men that it was prudent for black men to give such gatherings as wide a berth as possible. Sure, not every gathering of young white men was ill-intended towards black men, but the risk wasn’t worth one’s life.

That same mindset is at work today. People instinctively avoid gatherings of young black males. And not only do people avoid them, people also avoid confronting them in the same way they would confront a young male of any other race. If a young black male is acting up in a restaurant, or on a subway, or in a movie theater, or near a playground in my neighborhood, do I lower my gaze and pretend it isn’t happening? Or do I say something to him and risk getting stabbed to death?

And while these thugs might feel they’re doing other black people a favor by further manifesting their “street cred” to the rest of America, the fact is that they are hurting all black people in the long run. Sure, no white people will intervene when you behave like a feral animal at the local McDonalds. But because of you, nor will white people (or any other race of people, for that matter) move to your neighborhoods. Or invest in your communities. Or hire you for jobs. Or teach in your schools. Or ever trust you enough to breathe easy.

Touch me and see what happens. What happens is that the entire black community suffers, because of your need to act out your sophomoric “thug life” fantasy. What happens is that innocent people, both white and black, are murdered because they “disrespected” you.

Only black America, and black America alone, can eradicate this sickness. No government program or study group or reparation payment will fix this. This sickness has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with slavery, or Jim Crow, or any racial grievance, real or invented. This sickness is purely organic.

There is absolutely a light at the end of the tunnel, but it will require some serious soul-searching and a good, hard look in the mirror. It will require overcoming not only the “gangsta rap” culture of violence and brutal social Darwinism, but also the racist undertones affecting black America.

If a white man and a black man get into a fight, I don’t automatically side with the white man just because he’s white. If I were on a jury, I would look at all available evidence and try to make an informed judgement based on the knowledge available to me about who was at fault. But the crowd of Karmelo Anthony supporters outside the courthouse clearly don’t examine problems through any lens except the lens of racial grievance. Theirs is a knee-jerk reaction to defend black criminality, not on the grounds of objective evidence, but solely on the grounds that being black gives the defendant the moral approval to exist free from the constraints of the moral order. There is no other term for this mindset other than racism.

This racism ripples back to where it usually begins, i.e. the halls of academia. “Scholars” such as Harvard professor Stacey Patton blaming the murder victim because his father never taught him that “black boys have boundaries” will only further isolate the black community. Until black America confronts, defeats, and transcends both the racist and self-destructive elements of black subculture, it will continue to be its own worst enemy.

Despite what your “leaders” and racial-ambulance-chasing lawyers tell you in the press conferences, and despite what you see on Netflix, white America wants you to succeed. There are no hidden armies of hooded white supremacists just waiting for you to let your guard down. Rather, there are everyday, normal white people who share the goals, values, and hopes for their children as do everyday, normal black people. It’s the ones calling you a “sellout” for your achievements that you shouldn't trust.

We want you at our parties and at our barbecues. We want to talk over the fence and hear how well your son is doing at university, or in his new career, or on his honeymoon vacation. We want a true, honest friendship with you that you don’t forget exists the moment another black person enters the room.

But that won’t happen until you extend an open hand rather than a closed fist. It won’t happen so long as the baseless paranoia and resentment and hate continues to smolder. Bigots such as Cardi B and Jasmine Crockett are intentionally fanning the flames of vulgar tribalism, because this is how they get paid. But you… not them… you have to distinguish between what the honest side of you actually believes about us and what the deceptive side of you wants to believe about us.

Touch us, and see what happens. Most likely, you’ll get a smile, a handshake, an invitation. I guarantee you won’t get a knife in the chest.

The ball is in your court.

https://pjmedia.com/aj-christopher/2026/06/13/the-karmelo-anthony-problem-n4953923?utm_source=twdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Dems Routinely Call Us Nazis but Soil Their Diapers If We Insult Them

Dems Routinely Call Us Nazis but Soil Their Diapers If We Insult Them

Kenny Holston/The New York Times via AP, Pool

Top O' the Briefing

Happy Tuesday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Hortyllbiszt felt that he was emotionally ready to shine as the Braunschweiger Taquito King of the Tri-County Regional Fair.

Another day, another glimpse into the diseased minds of 2026 American Democrats. Hey, I've got to work with the material that's given to me, and there's certainly a lot on this front being offered these days. I have to frequently remind myself that I know people on the left who don't behave like rabid animals. None of them are in politics, though.

At the national, coastal level, Democrats have to be openly hostile and hateful towards Republicans to have any clout with the party higher-ups. They'll insist that it's only about President Trump, but their hatred for those of us who support him has become just as strong. 

The Democratic National Committee and the other party elites place a big premium on anger now. Foul-mouthed anger gets Dems extra time in front of cameras. They love talking about politicians who will "fight." If anybody fights back, however, they get very emtotional and act as if they've been paragons of civility all along. 

Matt wrote about the source of their latest wearisome outrage:

UFC heavyweight Josh Hokit had himself a night. He stopped Derrick Lewis by technical knockout at UFC Freedom 250, an event President Donald Trump hosted at the White House, and then made sure nobody would be talking about the fight itself. After thanking Trump for putting it together, Hokit closed out his post-fight interview with Joe Rogan by announcing, “Michelle Obama is a man, am I right, America?"

This has been quite the triggering event for the left, obviously. Mr. and Mrs. Lightbringer are the closest things to deities that the rabidly secular Democrats have anymore. 

For those of us on the right, there are few people in America who are less sympathetic than Michelle Obama. In the almost 10 years since she and her husband moved out of the White House, Mrs. Obama has used her platform to repeatedly disparage the United States of America. She's forever finding new ways to be insufferable and, not surprisingly, she's not a fan of Republicans. 

So, if her feelings get hurt by some UFC rando, I'm not going to be reaching for any tissues. 

Actually, given how nasty the Trump Derangement Syndrome Democrats have been, I don't think that there are too many bad things that can be said about them or their sacred cows these days. They call us racists, Nazis, and stupid over and over. I've had "tolerant" Democrat friends stop speaking to me. I did the whole "above the fray" thing for a long time and they all got worse. 

I'm quite happy to be down in the gutter with them for a while now. It would be good if I didn't have to stay here forever, but it's the best way to convey messages to the other side for the moment. 

Related: If You Can't Say Something Nice About Someone, You Must Be Talking About a Democrat

The mere mention of even voting Republican risks inviting unhinged resistance even in casual situations. We don't respond in kind to Democrats. It's not surprising that conservatives feel like blowing off steam when we finally find ourselves surrounded by like-minded individuals, however impolitely. Truthfully, calling Michelle Obama a man isn't one of the nastier things that could be said about her. She and her husband have been poisoning the American political conversation since they first rose to power. The Democrats who have the least decorum tend to rise to the top. 

Perhaps some of them should try being decent human beings for once if they want us to stop disparaging them. 

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/06/15/the-morning-briefing-dems-routinely-call-us-nazis-but-soil-their-diapers-if-we-insult-them-n4954008?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-NjBAWtDNDg&utm_term=&_nlid=NjBAWtDNDg&_nhids=nc40pCY4Hp4qls

Obama’s Presidential Center Looks Like His Ego Cast in Stone

Obama’s Presidential Center Looks Like His Ego Cast in Stone

Obama Foundation via AP

President Barack Hussein Obama wanted a monument in Chicago, and Chicago gave him parkland, patience, tax breaks, years of disruption, and now a tower that looks less like civic memory than self-regard poured into granite.

The Obama Presidential Center opens to the public June 19 in Jackson Park, a historic South Side park once shaped by Frederick Law Olmsted's vision. The Obama Foundation calls it an “awe-inspiring 19-acre campus.”

Many Chicagoans can look at the same structure and see something colder.

The building matches the man's politics. Obama, the 44th president, sold hope in polished speeches while leaving the country more divided than he found it. My criticism of Obama has never been about race; it's about ideology, arrogance, and the habit of treating dissent as a moral defect.

His center carries the same spirit: it rises over a working neighborhood like a lecture in stone, built by people who always sound certain they know what is best for everyone else.

The design has already drawn brutal reactions. The main tower has been described as a mostly windowless granite monolith, with critics comparing it to a fortified sci-fi prison.

Architect Billie Tsien, co-founder of Tod Williams Billie Tsien Architects, said Obama was “very, very hands-on with the design” and wanted angular forms inspired by sculptor Constantin BrâncuÈ™i. From The Guardian:

So, how to sym­bol­ise hope, justice, equal­ity and all the other bygone val­ues that Obama cham­pioned in his met­eoric ascent to the White House? How to com­mem­or­ate the first Black pres­id­ent in his­tory, in whom so much trans­form­a­tional faith was ves­ted, at a time when so many of his achieve­ments are being relent­lessly rolled back?

“We had the idea of a beacon,” says archi­tect Bil­lie Tsien, whose prac­tice, Tod Wil­li­ams Bil­lie Tsien Archi­tects, won the design com­pet­i­tion for the Obama Pres­id­en­tial Cen­ter in 2016, on the eve of the first Trump pres­id­ency. “We thought of four hands com­ing together,” she adds, hold­ing her cupped hands up against a col­league’s, as if pro­tect­ing a flame from the wind.

Above us, sheer walls of gran­ite erupt from the ground at a steep angle, before taper­ing to form a chis­elled 70-metre-high mono­lith. It looks hewn and cleft, tower­ing over the 19-acre cam­pus like a stocky, trun­cated obelisk. Rising above the low-rise, low-income neigh­bour­hood, the build­ing has an omin­ous pres­ence, its mostly win­dow­less heft recall­ing a men­acing sci-fi headquar­ters, with small chamfered open­ings sug­gest­ing portals from where drones might be launched, or lasers fired. Some have com­pared it to a flak tower, oth­ers to a “Klin­gon prison”. If it is a beacon of hope, it seems to be one that has been for­ti­fied at all costs against the present regime, a defens­ive bunker to pro­tect its fra­gile val­ues from siege.

“The pres­id­ent was very, very hands on with the design,” says Tsien, with a rue­ful air. “He talked a lot about his love of BrâncuÈ™i.” That’s the Romanian sculptor who was known for his carved, abstract forms. “And he wanted to make things more angu­lar and cut. To make a form, and then try to work out what goes inside it, is really the oppos­ite of how we’ve worked before. It was a very for­eign exer­cise.”

That detail tells us exactly everything we already know; the final product feels less like a public place than a former president's theory of himself.

The location has always been the deeper insult. The Obama Foundation built the center inside Jackson Park, part of a National Register-listed landscape, after years of lawsuits and complaints from people who objected to turning public parkland into a privately operated campus.

Protect Our Parks founder Herb Caplan argued the city effectively gave the foundation a 99-year deal for $10 and no real estate taxes. Courts let the project move forward, but a legal win doesn't make the public concern vanish. From WTTW:

“The principal argument is that there is actually a statute in the Park District code that says public parks property cannot be distributed to a private party for private use without providing substitute property of equal or greater value that will be used for outdoor public park purposes,” says Herb Caplan, founder and president of Protect Our Parks. “The city of Chicago bypassed that statute altogether.”

Caplan says the current deal “essentially gifts it to the Obama Foundation for 99 years for just $10.” He also notes the Obama Presidential Center will not have to pay real estate taxes.

According to Caplan, “the whole arrangement was illegal from the start” under both the U.S. and Illinois constitutions because it takes public land for private use. 

“It’s a denial of the public trust doctrine,” Caplan said Wednesday. “I think that the real problem and the thing that concerns me the most is that a lot of people that support the project are not aware of exactly how invasive this project is going to be and are unaware of the legal principles that are involved.”

Money now adds another layer of ugliness. Contractors and subcontractors say they're owed millions as the center nears its opening. Omar Shareef, president of the African American Contractors Association, said seven subcontractors contacted him for help over missing payments: some are owed seven figures.

Lakeside Alliance, the project's general contractor, said closeout disputes can continue after doors open, including reviews of invoices, change orders, and other contract issues.

One dispute already spilled into federal court. II in One, a black-owned concrete subcontractor, filed a $40 million lawsuit against Thornton Tomasetti, the structural engineering firm, alleging false claims and racial discrimination. From The Architect's Newspaper:

The lawsuit alleges that Thornton Tomasetti tried to “cover up” its own performance failures when employees of that company sent a letter to The Obama Foundation indicating that project delays and cost overruns happened thanks to “underperformance and inexperience of the concrete sub-contractor.” The engineering firm also allegedly said that the “contractor and subcontractor firms that were not minority owned could have completed the work without problems.”

“In essence,” the lawsuit continues, “the defendants told the project owner, falsely, that all of the project delays and cost overruns were the fault of the minority-owned firms, and that ‘more qualified’ firms (such as the firms that happen not to be owned by racial minorities) would not have required as much assistance or had as many ‘problems.’” [Parenthesis in original.]

“Unjustified and Discriminatory Conduct”

The plaintiffs claim that Thornton Tomasetti’s conduct is out of step with the project’s Diversity and Inclusion Plan, a facet, the lawsuit said, that emphasizes “maintaining an environment in which diversity and inclusion are valued and respected in all aspects of its operations as well as the operations of its partners and third-party contractors.”

Thornton Tomasetti has denied wrongdoing; whatever the courts decide, the optics are grim: a project wrapped in equity language now has contractors fighting over payment and blame while the ribbon-cutting machinery rolls on.

The endowment question deserves scrutiny, too. The Obama Foundation once cited $470 million for an endowment meant to sustain the center's operations for generations. The foundation says the center is fully funded through private contributions and plans significant endowment investment in coming years. Critics point to filings showing only $1 million in the reserve fund while the project's construction cost has climbed to at least $850 million. From the The Real Deal:

The delays and skyrocketing costs were caused in part by the pandemic and in part by a half-decade legal battle. By the time the groundbreaking ceremony was held in 2021, the cost was pegged at $830 million. The center will finally open on next Friday, the Juneteenth holiday, and the public will gain access to the work of roughly 475 subcontractors, according to the outlet. 

Some of the struggles with contractors have been out in the open for months. A spat between Thornton Tomasetti and Obama Center subcontractor II in One spilled over into a $40 million federal lawsuit that saw the black-owned II in One file a lawsuit against Thornton for alleged false claims and racial discrimination. Thornton is the firm managing structural engineering and design services for the development. According to the publication, there are other subcontractors engaging with legal counsel to resolve payment disputes. 

Lakeside Alliance, the general contractor for the project, claimed that the project’s size and the amount of moving parts mean the negotiations and strain are normal. In a statement, Lakeside said the Obama Center’s “contractual closeout — including the review and resolution of outstanding invoices, change orders and other project matters — continues long after the doors open.”

The neighborhood cost may be harder to measure but easier to feel. Housing advocates say short-term rental licenses rose 46% in Chicago's 20th Ward, which includes much of Woodlawn, while citywide licenses fell 38% over the same period.

Residents near the center have worried for years about rent hikes, displacement, and investors turning a neighborhood into a tourist zone before local families get much benefit.

Obama's center was supposed to bring change home. Instead, it looks like a monument to the same old ruling-class bargain: take public space, praise the community, hire consultants, polish the speeches, and leave ordinary people to wonder who really gets helped.

The building is ugly, but the arrogance behind it is worse.

https://pjmedia.com/david-manney/2026/06/13/obamas-presidential-center-looks-like-his-ego-cast-in-stone-n4953947?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-uyw5wmyWFf&utm_term=&_nlid=uyw5wmyWFf&_nhids=ncxGeHZbhXokls

He Said What He Said: Sen. Kennedy Flattens Schumer, Platner As the 'Platner Wing' Tightens Its Grip

He Said What He Said: Sen. Kennedy Flattens Schumer, Platner As the 'Platner Wing' Tightens Its Grip

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

As I wrote on Thursday, the results of the Maine Democrat Senate primary made clear that a majority of the Democrats who voted wouldn't care if Graham Platner kicked puppies, crushed butterflies with his bare hand, and stole old ladies' purses, much less be a Nazi sympathizer and allegedly physically abusive towards a woman, provided he does his part in giving the party control of the U.S. Senate.

While he has his true believers in the Senate, like Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), others, like Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), have been purposely avoiding saying too much about Platner, and his Republican colleague, Sen.John Kennedy (R-LA), knows exactly why.

Kennedy has made it a point this week on at least two occasions - one on the Senate floor and one in a Fox News interview - to point out how it's now the "Platner wing" of the party that controls it, and also to warn folks exactly what that entails and the kind of person Graham Platner is and what he represents.


SEE ALSO: Report: The Graham Platner 'Redemption' Tour Hits a Snag As Another Alleged Ex Spills the Tea


In his Senate floor speech, Kennedy observed that Schumer was now "taking his orders from the Graham Platner wing of the Democratic Party" because that wing of the party "is in control." 

"Many members of Democratic leadership are scared to death, and they're gonna do what the Graham Platner wing of the party wants," he went on to say. They want to "burn it down, they want chaos, because they think it will help them win the midterm elections."

Watch:

And just who is this guy, the leader of this wing of the Democrat Party? Kennedy explained it on Fox News as only he can and in a way that would make a great campaign ad for Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), who Platner (and Schumer) would love to defeat:

Mr. Platner seems to be one of the new faces of the loon wing of the Democratic Party. Clearly, he’s angry. When I see him on TV, he always looks like he’s straining to have a stool.

His supporters say no, you don’t understand him. He’s just idiosyncratic. I guess he goose steps to the beat of his own drummer. But his history shows there’s more than that.

I mean, this guy makes...he makes Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez look like Aunt Bea in Mayberry. Mr. Platner’s comments about black people, his cavalier attitude towards rape, apparently his stated preference for masturbating in a porta-potty, his contempt for America.

I think at one point he implied he wished the Taliban were better shots to kill our people. This is not normal. I mean, this guy is 10 exits past normal.

Then he says well, that was in my past. I’ve been born again. But just recently we found out through his wife that Mr. Platner has been sending sexually explicit messages, digital messages, to other women.

He calls it sexting. He says, 'Oh, there’s nothing to see here.' Well, Anthony Weiner was sexting. We all said what is that about, and we found out he was sending pictures of his penis to young women.

Now, I’m not saying Mr. Platner is doing that. I don’t know. But he needs to release those text messages. I want to know if he’s a sexual predator! I mean, the people of Maine deserve to know. This guy is...he’s like a Saturday Night Live skit!

Watch:

In another clip, Kennedy talked about how, though the Republican Party was not perfect, "the other side is crazy. I mean this is not normal behavior," he said of Platner and the Platner wing of the Democrat Party:

And more to the point, Maine voters - outside of the ones who don't care about the Nazi tattoo, the sexting, the Kik account, and the allegedly physically abusive behavior - deserve to know the truth about the guy who wants to be their next senator, because he certainly hasn't been keen to tell it. And because he won't, it's up to the people who do respect the voters of this country and love America to get the word out that this guy is seriously bad news.

https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2026/06/12/sen-john-kennedy-discusses-graham-platner-n2203303?utm_source=twdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

The Great Electricity Rip-Off: Why Your Bill Keeps Going Up

The Great Electricity Rip-Off: Why Your Bill Keeps Going Up

The Great Electricity Rip-Off: Why Your Bill Keeps Going Up
AP Photo/David J. Phillip

For all of my adult life, I have believed that free markets incentivize innovation, generate lower costs, and improve services. Indeed, confidence in the value of free markets is one of the foundations of conservatism, and why I align with the Republican Party.

I have also always felt that conservatives need to be on the lookout for industries that try to co-opt the free market movement, to take advantage of their customers, and do so under the guise of competition. Giving customers options is a good thing, but only if they actually deliver innovations, better services, and lower prices.

Speaking of lower prices, electricity is an issue that is getting a lot of attention. Even our President has weighed in on ensuring the American people are protected from rate increases tied to data centers. Another issue that is impacting how much people pay for electricity is how utilities are, or are not, regulated.

Specifically, it’s worth asking if three decades of deregulation across the country, which has forced utilities to compete to sell power to customers, has delivered lower prices. Or have the deregulated states allowed utility customers to be overcharged by fraudsters masquerading as competitors to regulated utilities?

After taking a hard look at our energy sector, specifically how Americans get electricity, I think it is becoming increasingly clear that the old-fashioned, regulated electricity model with a single incumbent electricity provider makes a lot more sense than the so-called deregulated markets. The bottom line is that fully regulated electric utilities consistently provide customers with lower-cost power. In other words, deregulation has not delivered lower prices, innovations, or better services to utility customers. Instead, the opposite is true.

Don’t take my word for it, though.

A pivotal Wall Street Journal story found that: “U.S. consumers who signed up with retail energy companies that emerged from deregulation paid $19.2 billion more than they would have if they’d stuck with incumbent utilities from 2010 through 2019…”

The New York Times agreed, reporting: “California and the 34 other states that have deregulated all or parts of their electricity system tend to have higher rates than the rest of the country.”

Why are deregulated states forcing customers to pay more for electricity? It turns out that the companies that compete with the utilities to sell power to customers are ripping people off.

Consider a recent report from the John Glenn College of Public Affairs at the Ohio State University, titled “How Deregulation Made Electricity More Expensive, Not Cheaper.” The leading cause of higher rates identified by the report is a group of middlemen called retail suppliers that promise to help customers secure lower-priced electricity. They do this by taking customers off of the regulated rate charged by the incumbent utility – known as standard offer service – and transferring them to a system of competitive rates.

But the problem is that while these retail suppliers might initially offer a rate lower than the standard offer service, the contracts allow them to auto-renew the agreements into variable-rate plans that consistently raise prices.

Some might call this style of marketing by retail suppliers a “bait and switch” or a scam. Whatever you call it, it’s not a free market, and retail suppliers should stop pretending they care about utility competition. According to one watchdog, in 2024 alone, retail suppliers overcharged 11.4 million customers in the U.S., a whopping $4 billion more for electricity than what those customers would have paid if they had simply stuck with their incumbent utility.

Now, even though President Donald J. Trump has eliminated many of Joe Biden’s programs that exacerbated inflation, millions of Americans are still struggling with affordability. With that in mind, I think it’s time that lawmakers and policy experts around the country come together and help the American people with lower electric bills by promoting sensible utility regulation that blocks retail suppliers from overcharging their customers.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kenblackwell/2026/06/12/the-great-electricity-rip-off-why-your-bill-keeps-going-up-n2677633?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-gUNPAsuPNP&utm_term=&_nlid=gUNPAsuPNP&_nhids=ncexnCPgUexLls

Monday, June 15, 2026

Italian Woman Beheaded as Attacker Recites Passages From a Book. Yeah, THAT Book.

Italian Woman Beheaded as Attacker Recites Passages From a Book. Yeah, THAT Book.

Sandro Capatti/ANSA via AP

The new Europe is going to take some getting used to, but at least it’s clear now what it’s going to be like. Populating it will be people who believe that they have a responsibility to carry out the decrees of the creator of the universe, and they believe that among those decrees is a mandate to kill those who do not believe in that creator unless they submit to the hegemony of his law.

And so in Italy recently, a woman was beheaded, in accord with commands found in the holy book of a rapidly growing segment of Italy’s population, and in case anyone remained determined to miss the point of what he had done (as many European authorities are), the perpetrator helpfully quoted from that book in justification of his actions. Welcome to the new Europe.

The Italian-language Firenze Today reported Friday that Issam Chlih, “a 29-year-old homeless Moroccan national,” is “the sole suspect in the murder of Silke Sauer,” who was “a 44-year-old German woman found decapitated near an abandoned farmhouse in the park of the former CNR site in Scandicci.” CNR is the National Research Council, an Italian government agency devoted to scientific and technological exploration.

Preliminary Investigations Judge (GIP) Roberta Di Maria ordered Chlih detained “due to the risk that Chlih might flee or reoffend.” This was a sensible decision, as the “‘brutal’ nature of the murder and the suspect’s personality led the judge to believe he might turn to contacts in his home country to escape. Furthermore, the judge noted that the circumstances of the crime and the attempt to clean up the crime scene demonstrated ‘an extraordinary level of criminal persistence.’”

Once again, welcome to the new Italy. Issam Chlih, however, is not your average hardened criminal or garden-variety recidivist. This is clear from the details of what happened on the fateful night in which Chlih beheaded Silke Sauer. “According to the Carabinieri's reconstruction,” Firenze Today notes, “Issam Chlih and Silke Sauer were together on the evening of February 16 and had stopped at a bar in Florence near the Leopolda station. Witnesses reported that Chlih shouted incoherent phrases and harassed customers. Police arrived at the scene after the bar manager called the emergency number (112).”

The police were, however, too late: the couple had already left the bar. Early in the morning of the following day, however, “they returned to Scandicci by tram. Video surveillance cameras captured them walking toward the abandoned farmhouse. They reportedly began arguing right near the building.” It was at this point that “other homeless individuals present in the park at the former CNR site reportedly heard screaming and a male voice reciting verses from the Qur'an, shouting that the devil had taken possession of the woman. Immediately afterward, a female voice—presumably Silke Sauer’s—was heard shouting ‘stop’ in Italian.”

Issam Chlih did not stop. And “the following day, in a state of agitation, Chlih reportedly drove away anyone approaching the dog park adjacent to the farmhouse. Passersby called emergency services, and the twenty-nine-year-old was admitted to Torregalli Hospital. The next day, Wednesday, February 18, Silke’s body was discovered.”

How could something like this have happened? Well, that ain’t exactly rocket science. What Qur'an verses could Issam Chlih have been reciting? These are good candidates: “When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks...” (47:4) And: “When your Lord inspired the angels, I am with you. So make those who believe stand firm. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Then strike the necks and strike their fingertips.” (8:12)

Related: All It Took Was a Single Non-Woke Word for This Man’s Life’s Work to Come to the Brink of Ruin

Now, just because something is commanded in the Qur’an, and a Muslim acted in accord with that command and quoted that same book, that doesn’t mean that he actually carried out his actions because that’s what the book told him to do. But it certainly makes it likely, except to the terminally blinkered and willfully ignorant. And there are plenty of those.

In Italy and elsewhere in the West, we will soon be told that Issam Chlih and others like him are mentally ill, and that Islam doesn't condone this sort of behavior. The people who are "experts" in the field of "counterterrorism" will assure us of this. And no one will contradict them, as those who know what the Qur'an says have already been vilified and dismissed as "Islamophobes." And so Silke Sauer will by no means be the last person to be beheaded in this manner.

https://pjmedia.com/robert-spencer/2026/06/13/italian-woman-beheaded-as-attacker-recites-passages-from-a-book-yeah-that-book-n4953937?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm