Sunday, May 3, 2026

The Elitist Media Despise Black Conservatives

The Elitist Media Despise Black Conservatives

The Elitist Media Despise Black Conservatives
AP Photo/Eric Gay

Black conservatives perennially face the slur that they're "not really black" if they aren't on the Left. Not only that, they are tools of white racists if they dissent from the NAACP's hard line.

When the Supreme Court voted 6-3 to overturn a racially gerrymandered congressional district in Louisiana, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) was outraged by the local Deseret News in Salt Lake City prominently featuring an Associated Press photo of a lone black protester in front of the court holding a sign that said, "Thurgood is watching you, Clarence." That implied Thurgood Marshall was disappointed in Clarence Thomas.

Lee tweeted: "They're going after Justice Thomas for being conservative while Black. That's racist. And it's very, very wrong." He added: "It'd be absurd to assume that Justice Alito should agree with the late Justice Brennan because he's white. It's racist and offensive for @Deseret to suggest that Justice Thomas should agree with the late Justice Thurgood Marshall because he's Black."

Rep. Burgess Owens (R-Utah), a black conservative, seconded that thought: "When the Left can't beat a Conservative Black man's argument, they attack his Blackness." For example, the Congressional Black Caucus has a membership of 60 Democrats, but none of the five black Republicans in Congress.

This kind of slur greeted Thomas when he was nominated for the Supreme Court in the summer of 1991. NBC reporter Bob Herbert uncorked a commentary underlining "David Duke, former Ku Klux Klan leader, is crazy about Clarence Thomas." Columnist Carl Rowan wrote Thomas had no talent, only the ability to "bootlick" Reagan and Bush, that "If you gave Clarence Thomas a little flour on his face, you'd think you had David Duke talking."

That same spirit continues today, as the ladies on ABC's "The View" were upset with Justice Thomas. Joy Behar complained he "didn't stick up for his own." Two years ago, Behar complained that Sen. Tim Scott doesn't understand being black, "the systemic racism that African Americans face in this country and other minorities. He doesn't get it. Neither does Clarence. And that's why they're Republicans." At the time, Sen. Scott tweeted: "When a Black conservative who believes in the future of this nation stands up to be counted, they lose their minds."

The standard leftist line is represented by Sen. Cory Booker, pushing hyperbolic lies. "Morning Joe" championed his tweet that Thomas and Co. gave "a green light for unconstitutional attacks on the voting rights that generations of Americans bled and died to secure." But no one has been denied the right to vote.

The Left insists that unless blacks get to elect other blacks, they have no voting rights. So what happens when a majority-black district elects a white guy (Steve Cohen in Memphis) or an Indian guy (Shrinivas Thanedar in Detroit)? Did their voting rights disappear?

It got worse. Booker told MS NOW's Jonathan Lemire that the Court's verdict is "eliminating black representation, disenfranchising African American voters by drawing creative districts that completely take away any kind of representation." So all 65 black members of Congress are going to lose their seats? Or too many Democrats might?

It's also bizarre that Booker would talk about "drawing creative districts," when that is exactly what many majority-minority districts look like on a map — as it was in this court case, the Sixth District of Louisiana, which looks like a squashed centipede intersecting the district of Speaker Mike Johnson.

Black conservatives aren't in favor of "eliminating" black legislators or "disenfranchising" black voters. But leftists will villainize them like this because negative campaigning can work. Pretending only black Democrats are black isn't going away.

https://townhall.com/columnists/timgraham/2026/05/01/the-elitist-media-despise-black-conservatives-n2675348?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-85yfsGq4ue&utm_term=&_nlid=85yfsGq4ue&_nhids=ncqWjHq0Fxj1ls

Same Old, Same Old: Target Trump

Same Old, Same Old: Target Trump

Same Old, Same Old: Target Trump
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

At the White House Correspondents' Dinner, President Donald Trump was the target of yet a third assassination attempt — this time in full view of the Washington press corps.

The event was presented as a spirited night with Trump. After 11 years of avoiding the predominantly left-wing media event, he decided to revisit the dinner. He anticipated that he would be the object of ridicule inside the hall — and that he might see possible violence outside it.

Indeed, protesters ringed the hotel. In grimly prescient fashion, the usual sort of crowd that night was channeling John Wilkes Booth — sic semper tyrannis — with placards reading "Death to Tyrants."

They again almost got their wish.

All three of the would-be Trump shooters — along with Charlie Kirk's murderer — fit the predictable profile of arrested-development, deranged leftists. They apparently sought to reify the popular Democrat hatred of Trump and his supporters, thereby imagining themselves entering the pantheon of revolutionary heroes.

So too, not long ago, did the would-be killer of Trump, Austin Tucker Martin, storm Mar-a-Lago in search of the absent president.

This time, the latest assassin, Cole Tomas Allen, left a manifesto repeating the old saw of Trump as "Hitler" and sought to kill the president and his Cabinet members. Indeed, his incoherent screed read like a Petri dish of all the supposed sins of Trump, drawing on left-wing conspiracies about Russian collusion, lawfare myths, and the Epstein files.

Allen's attempt was another fantasy of mass murdering, not unlike that of former Bernie Sanders campaign aide James T. Hodgkinson. He tried to take out Republican congressional leaders — wounding four, including House Republican Majority Whip Steve Scalisen— in a baseball practice in Washington.

Other than the fact that the shooter nearly reached the doors to the auditorium, the Secret Service performed brilliantly — despite the Democratic effort to shut down the Department of Homeland Security.

Apparently, the Left's mindset is that the security of elected officials — Trump especially — and of American citizens is not nearly as important as ensuring that foreign nationals who entered the country illegally are not legally returned to their countries of origin.

Assassins are motivated by all sorts of impulses, but certainly they do not act in a void.

From the trickle-down world of social media, the internet, and street theater, would-be killers absorb elite signals. This messaging becomes especially baleful when celebrities, governors, senators, and politicos amplify the claim that Trump is a fascist, a Nazi, a monster who is destroying the country and who must be stopped "by any means necessary." Late-night comedians joke about past assassinations or assassination attempts; others have even claimed that Trump staged his first assassination attempt — and this one too!

So deep runs their hatred.

For over a decade, the Left has escalated its rhetoric of violence against Trump. Each politico, actor, celebrity, or billionaire seems to vie with the next in imagining new ways to kill or assault him.

Had that sort of rhetoric been directed at former presidents Barack Obama or Joe Biden, it would likely have put many of them in jail.

Count the Ways of Ending Trump?

So, how many ways have our elite leftists dreamed of beating up or murdering Trump?

Gavin Newsom, Nancy Pelosi, and Robert De Niro all preferred punching him out. The now-infamous Kathy Griffin opted for beheading. So did Marilyn Manson.

The New York actors of Shakespeare in the Park turned Julius Caesar into Trump and staged his mass stabbing.

Mickey Rourke fancied clubbing; Snoop Dogg, shooting.

The late celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain's choice, predictably, was poisoning.

"Comedian" George Lopez seconded the Iranian idea of a bounty killing. Pearl Jam offered the macabre vision of a bald eagle feeding on Trump's corpse.

Larry Wilmore dreamed of suffocating Trump. Do we remember Moby and Madonna, who opted for blowing up Trump?

Rosie O'Donnell tried to be original by envisioning Trump being thrown off a cliff.

Johnny Depp joked about a John Wilkes Booth-style Trump assassination. Epstein friend and billionaire Reid Hoffman preened, "Yeah, I wish I had made him an actual martyr."

Do we recall Biden's boast to his donors: "So, we're done talking about the debate. It's time to put Trump in a bullseye."

In that regard, he-man Biden simply reverted to his earlier bullyboy boasts: "If we were in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him," and "The press always asks me, 'Don't I wish I were debating him? No, I wish we were in high school — I could take him behind the gym. That's what I wish."

For all the praise of the Secret Service's quick reaction, there is no excuse for the shooter having pranced into his hotel room with weapons and then meandering through the lobby armed. During the Biden presidency, the Secret Service was derelict in the first two close-call Trump assassination attempts.

Do we even remember that Biden denied Secret Service protection to candidate Robert Kennedy Jr. out of pique that his original Democrat challenger might weaken him and help put Trump back in the White House?

In 2024, January 6 Committee Rep. Bennie Thompson (MS-2), crafted a law — ridiculously entitled the "Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable (DISGRACED) Former Protectees Act" — to strip away Secret Service protection for then-former President Trump?

What was Thompson's wish?

Hitler Trump?

Do we remember the New Republic cover where Trump was photoshopped as Adolf Hitler?

When called out, The New Republic doubled down, offering no apologies for its sick messaging.

"Today, we at The New Republic think we can spend this election year in one of two ways. We can spend it debating whether Trump meets the nine or 17 points that define fascism. Or we can spend it saying, 'He's damn close enough, and we'd better fight.'"

And so you encourage fellow leftist comrades like Cole Tomas Allen, Ryan Wesley Routh, and Thomas Matthew Crooks to "fight" — to eliminate your Trump-Hitler, allegedly another mass murderer of six million.

The now media-orphaned Joy Reid repeatedly and ad nauseam invoked Trump-Hitler memes: "Then let me know who I got to vote for to keep Hitler out of the White House." Rachel Maddow sermonized that she was studying Hitler in order to understand Trump.

Those who tried to kill Trump — and murdered Charlie Kirk — likely assumed they would eventually be canonized for ending the "Nazi" threat.

Indeed, Trump is now the only U.S. president in history to be the target of three assassination attempts involving gunfire — with more than two years to go in his tenure as a target.

Since the Trump inauguration, ritualized left-wing street violence has become the norm — torching Tesla dealerships and cars, swarming ICE officers and facilities, and violent campus demonstrations on behalf of Hamas, usually characterized by overt antisemitic rhetoric and harassment of Jews.

ICE officers are routinely attacked, pelted with rocks and bottles, and doxxed — the street-level version of the Democrat-elected officials who slander them as Nazis and fascists and promise to arrest them for the crime of enforcing federal immigration law, deliberately undermined by the Biden administration.

Piker Sickness

The latest left-wing heartthrob podcaster, the affluent Hasan Piker, just gave a gushing interview to affluent New York Times reporter Nadja Spiegelman and affluent New Yorker writer Jia Tolentino.

The two adoringly nodded as Piker matter-of-factly declared it was perfectly fine to rob stores — and anyone and anything that he arbitrarily defined as part of the oppressor class. "Yeah, I think it's cool. We gotta get back to cool crimes like that. Bank robberies. Stealing priceless artifacts, things of that nature." So spoke the multimillionaire Piker.

More disturbingly, Piker has more or less suggested that the cold-blooded assassin of UnitedHealthcare CEO Thompson, Brian Luigi Mangione, had understandable cause to kill — under the Marxist defense of "social murder" against purported enemies of the people.

I mention Piker because, earlier in 2025, at a public event, he referred — with a wink and nod — to killing Trump. Indeed, he declared, "Someone has to do it. See, when I say that, everyone knows exactly what I mean."

Of course, they did on cue. His giddy interviewer, Taylor Lorenz, later highlighted Piker's Trump threat in a video.

The Democrat Addiction

Post facto, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries commendably urged lowering the political temperature. One good way would have been for Jeffries not to have attacked Trump's prior "Big Beautiful Bill" while posing with a baseball bat.

Or Jeffries might have politely advised congressional Democrat women not to cut a "Choose Your Fighter" video in which they shadowbox and throw punches to stop Trump. Or he might have advised his Democrat colleagues, such as Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, Bernie Sanders, and Jasmine Crockett, to stop smearing Trump as a fascist.

For years, we were lectured by the Left that "words matter," in defense of their efforts to censor "misinformation," "disinformation," and "hurtful language." But all that now appears to be abject projection, since it is the Left's verbiage that has lowered the bar on the violence and encouraged killers to come out of the shadows to save us from supposed "fascists" and "Hitler" types.

Do we also recall the would-be assassin Nicholas John Roske, who joined left-wing protestors crowding the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices — a felony — and was planning to kill Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the perennial target of hysterical left-wing attacks?

Not long ago, Minnesota governor and former vice presidential candidate Tim Walz flew, in a time of war, to address a socialist, anti-American audience of Trump haters in Barcelona. Once there, Walz trashed Trump as a fascist — for the sixth time.

On two occasions, Walz's running mate Kamala Harris referred to Trump as a fascist — this from Harris, who, in 2020, live on television and in the midst of the George Floyd riots in Washington, encouraged the demonstrations by saying, "They're not gonna stop, and everyone beware, because they're not gonna stop . . . They're not gonna stop before Election Day in November, and they're not gonna stop after Election Day . . . Everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they're not going to let up--and they should not. And we should not."

And they never did stop, Kamala.

In the last 22 months, Trump has survived three assassination attempts. At the present rate, sadly, we should expect another three or four efforts before he leaves office.

Why?

The hardcore left-wing establishment believes this sort of Hitler/Trump rhetoric, combined with the normalization of street violence, generates ever more protests, fuels anti-ICE fury, unites congressional Democrats, and — most importantly — drives down Trump poll numbers. In their view, it is a lot more effective than merely outlining an alternative agenda.

So expect far more, not less, of this left-wing violent madness to come.

https://townhall.com/columnists/victordavishanson/2026/04/30/same-old-same-old-target-trump-n2675360?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-TVsJSUN55X&utm_term=&_nlid=TVsJSUN55X&_nhids=ncqWjHq0Fxj1ls

There’s a Name for What They’re Doing to Donald Trump

There’s a Name for What They’re Doing to Donald Trump

Stefani Reynolds/Pool via AP

Once upon a time, there was a societal pact in this country that, when a depraved lunatic committed an atrocity, no one would breathe a word of his motives, speech, or writings. When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold kicked off the school shooting craze at Columbine High School in 1999, we didn’t speak of what they thought they were accomplishing. Their so-called basement tapes were never publicly released, and authorities destroyed them in 2011. "Law enforcement officials have always regarded the tapes as a particularly infectious form of toxic waste, a primer in mass murder that could inspire more violence and must never be released," reported the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition.

The understanding was that repeating a lunatic’s motivations could inspire copycats. Back then, society hoped to prevent more tragedy.

Today’s Democrat establishment hopes to inspire it. So brazen have they become that, less than 24 hours after Cole Allen tried to assassinate President Donald Trump, CBS reporter Norah O'Donnell read the slander from his manifesto to his intended victim’s face. Trump called her out, saying, "Well, I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you're horrible people.”

He was right, but no matter: Management at CBS still went on to air those poisonous words on its Sunday show, 60 Minutes. Because everyone at that vile network is in on it.

So is every single newscaster, elected or appointed official, celebrity, and every other leftist with a sheen of authority or influence and a platform who repeats the litany of leftist accusations.

But then, Democrats are the morally challenged segment of society, dating back to their slaveholder roots (now manifested as fighting to keep their cheap labor through trafficking poor people into the country to work for near-slave wages). Once they hid behind the "liberal" label, but that has morphed into what plainly animates them today: hate, perversion, and political violence. Cheering on an assassin, either explicitly or implicitly, is A-OK with them.

Democrats are also all about plausible deniability. Just ask Joe Biden's grifty brother, Jim. This is why this sort of mass projection of violence in the hopes of triggering a nut with good aim is such a perfect fit for them.

It's called "stochastic terrorism." Perhaps, in the case of the relentless attack on Donald Trump, we can more accurately call it "stochastic assassination."

Policy research agency RAND explained the concept in a 2024 report called "From words to actions":

The role of the media in radicalisation and terrorism has been a topic of discussion in recent years. Citizens are increasingly at risk to be exposed to extremist ideas through social media and communication apps, which can lead to a normalisation of hatred towards certain individuals, groups or institutions and an increased acceptance of violence. A term that is gaining popularity in the media and popular scientific literature in the context of recent incidents of extremist violence in which the media may have played a role is 'stochastic terrorism'.

This term refers to hostile, derogatory and/or dehumanising language by influential individuals towards a political, social, ethnic or religious group or individual. Through interaction on social media and traditional media, this language may lead to a climate of fear, which in turn increases the likelihood of someone turning to violence, even if the initial message does not explicitly call for it. Due to the implicit nature of these expressions, individuals responsible for (reinforcing) inflammatory discourse cannot straightforwardly be prosecuted, if at all. However, there is currently no legal definition or even a unified understanding of this somewhat elusive concept.

My colleague VodkaPundit explained how the left is leveling the tactic against the president: "…there's no conspiracy required to produce a left-wing assassin like Tyler James Robinson or Ryan Routh. They just amp up the rhetorical pressure, 24/7/365, until somebody pops."

Do read the whole thing: No Conspiracy Required

For example, remember during Trump's first term, when TIME LIFE put out a Special Magazine called "ASSASSINS Killers Who Changed History"? And then newsstands and retailers festooned their businesses with the issue?

Oh, no — no wink-wink nod-nod to your friendly neighborhood assassin there!

It is nearly impossible to prosecute someone for stochastically calling for an assassin to step up. James Comey and his g**dam seashells are now a test case. You can’t tell me that a man so steeped in law enforcement as to become director of the nation’s police force had no idea that the expression "86" might be interpreted as "off," "murder," or "kill." Especially within the historical context of two would-be assassins trying to kill "47" not a year earlier, with one spectacularly putting a bullet through the president's ear. 

That smarmy beanpole knew exactly what he was doing. They all do.

If it happens one day — if some nut job succeeds in killing the man — then all these leftists who participated in this mass psy-op will be just as guilty as if they had pulled the trigger themselves. They don't care, of course. There will be no consequences. Stochastic terrorism is near-impossible to prosecute, and even if we could, we couldn't put half the country in jail. So, what the hell — it's worth a shot to these dehumanizing haters.

They know damn well what they're doing.

https://pjmedia.com/athena-thorne/2026/04/30/theres-a-name-for-what-theyre-doing-to-donald-trump-n4952360?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Saturday, May 2, 2026

Nothing Scares Democrats More Than the Idea of Merit

Nothing Scares Democrats More Than the Idea of Merit

Nothing Scares Democrats More Than the Idea of Merit
Darren McGee/ Office of Governor Kathy Hochul via AP

The Supreme Court striking down Democrat racism in the drawing of Congressional districts set off a predictable wave of panic across the Left, as the concept of having to make a case to voters who aren’t simply blindly loyal to the party began to sink in. While Democrats will happily sterilize or mutilate any pre-teen going through puberty confusion, they absolutely refuse to have a conversation with an American who will not bow down to their left-wing agenda. Why? Because they can’t. There is no case to be made by the Left to normal people, so they refuse to and have created districts of the obedient to serve the party, as nothing scares the hell out of a Democrat more than having to compete for anything based on merit.

You see this with unions, where they fight tooth and nail to block or repeal right-to-work laws. They are terrified of people having the choice to join a union or not, they’d rather simply force them. If their product was so good – if the benefits of union membership were obvious, people would voluntarily flock to them. That they don’t tells you pretty much everything you know about it, doesn’t it?

The same goes for Congressional Districts – Democrats would rather pick their voters than try to convince them.

Maryland is a prime example. There used to be three Republicans in Maryland’s Congressional Delegation; now there is one. Democrats redrew the state in a way that made the map look like someone sneezed on a wet Rorschach test to eliminate two of the GOP seats and lamented they weren’t able to get the 3rd…yet.

This started in 2010 and continued in 2020, but Texas is somehow what “forced” Democrats to gerrymander Virginia? It’s almost like they’re lying, or something, isn’t it?

Now that the party can no longer create districts to funnel minorities together and ensure a Democrat district, you’d think they’d at least consider the idea of making a case to everyone as to why they should vote for them. That isn’t even being discussed.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul tweeted on April 29, “The Supreme Court has been chipping away at our elections for years. It is clearly carrying out Donald Trump’s will with this decision. New York has always led the fight for voting rights and we’ll lead again. I’m working with the Legislature to change New York’s redistricting process so we can fight back against Washington’s attempts to rig our democracy.”

Illinois Governor and Blimp JB Pritzker announced he would be looking for ways to ignore the decision, too. I’m old enough to remember when the concept of anyone subverting a court decision was a “threat to our democracy,” but then it’s hard to scream that while yelling how you’re defending it out the other side of your face (no matter how fat that face is).

Nowhere will you find Democrats attempting to win people to their side; they just want to herd people already there into districts where they water down anyone else who dares to think for themselves. It’s political date rape — they’re going to get their way, no matter what they have to do in order to get it.

Former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris hysterically claimed they wanted “to be President of all Americans!” They then spent their time in office and on the campaign trail speaking violently of half the country. During his four years in the White House, Biden never once gave an interview to Fox News, and Kamala only gave one to Bret Baier, which means they spoke to and addressed the questions of half the country exactly once in four years.

But they want to be President for all Americans? How do you do that when you refuse to speak with them?

You can’t. And Democrats like it that way, which is why they’ve set up systems designed to ensure they retain power without ever having to.

The Supreme Court put a major dent in that concept for Democrats this week, but don’t expect the Left to comply. They will fight so hard to protect their access to power, you’d think they were fighting for illegal alien gang members or something, because their power is their top priority. And they know they can’t make a case for their cause to anyone who won’t reflexively obey or on the merits of their ideas. That should tell everyone all they need to know about how to vote.

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2026/04/30/nothing-scares-democrats-more-than-the-idea-of-merit-n2675276?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-ju9QQT2K33&utm_term=&_nlid=ju9QQT2K33&_nhids=ncDmrHYeiDBPls

The Atrocities Liberals Don't Care About

The Atrocities Liberals Don't Care About

AP Photo/Richard Drew

No Jews, no news. 

In the media, at the UN, at lefty activist rallies, and at Pravda media editorial meetings deciding what to cover, it's always the same. 

No Jews, no news. 

The United Nations JUST added Iran to yet another Human Rights commission, just weeks after the Ayatollahs and the IRGC murdered tens of thousands of protesters on the streets. Countries such as Canada and many in the EU stood by as Iran was elevated to an even higher status as a leader in human rights. 

Condemning Israel is practically an obsession with the UN, the media, and the left. Or, should I say, condemning Israel is. Every insane accusation is given credence, such as the insane accusation that Israel has trained dogs to rape Palestinian prisoners, while the same officials look away as their own investigation shows that Hamas uses rape as a weapon against Israelis and, in fact, Palestinians as well. 

Atrocities around the world routinely go uncovered, such as the genocides of Christians in Africa, the mass rapes happening in Gaza by Hamas, the horrific abuses in Iran, and the coverage of these barely exists, and the attention of the "human rights" Rapporteurs at the UN is nonexistent. 

Iran is recruiting child soldiers both at home and abroad—in London, for God's sake—and there is discussion of lifting sanctions on Iran. Friedrich Merz floated the idea in Germany, if you can believe it, and as far as I can tell it is because he disapproves of Trump. 

There was yet another terrorist attack on Jews in London yesterday, and the talk I heard was of "blowback." From the very same people who express outrage that Israel went to war against Hamas because it killed over a thousand of its citizens. 

Blowback makes it OK if you are a Muslim killing Jews, but God forbid that Jews defend themselves. Their job is to shut up and get in the rail cars. 

Where is the coverage of atrocities around the world? Why is Iran being put on human rights commissions? For that matter, why was Iran, I kid you not, put on the UN committee to review the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty? As the Vice President of the committee.

No joke. #Iran's regime, which is in violation of the NPT, has stonewalled IAEA Safeguards inquiries for years, and whose head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran is under UN sanctions, has just been named a vice president of the NPT Review Conference. You can't make up this latest episode of UN insanity.

It's as if the point of the media and the internationalists is not to promote peace or human rights, but to condemn Jews. Islamists can kill anybody, including other Muslims, and it is an expression of righteous rage. But if a Jew rises in self-defense, he is committing genocide. 

The irony is thick. Gulf countries are beginning to unite with Israel. The UAE now has the Iron Dome and Israeli advisors helping defend against Iran. 

Our "allies" in the West are siding with evil.

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2026/04/30/the-atrocities-liberals-dont-care-about-n3814430?utm_source=pjmediambvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm