Thursday, June 18, 2026

Here’s Why Democrats Hate America

Here’s Why Democrats Hate America

Here’s Why Democrats Hate America
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, File

Have you ever noticed how the people who complain most about sports are the people who sucked at them as kids, people who were picked last and embarrassed the species with their lack of coordination and skill? Or the “feminists” who complain the most about beauty pageants are the ones who were least likely to get asked to a high school dance or get a date in college? “You hate what you don’t understand,” the Left always lectures when it comes to its weird social programs or race hustles. They’ve stumbled onto something there, only not the way they mean it.

There is nothing the untalented hate more than being judged. It’s the sense of being judged improperly – there are plenty of people who suck at things who are blissfully unaware of it, with their ego overriding what little common sense they may have (think of the morbidly obese in public wearing spandex, if you need help conjuring up an extreme sense of lack of self- awareness).

Being judged inaccurately is not something that happens often in situations where merit is a major factor; you either win or you lose. You’re either best, or you’re not.

Democrats are never the best; they are an awful lot of creatures who recognize their own shortcomings without ever publicly acknowledging them. Since the United States of America is the only country in the history of the planet where you can become whatever it is your skills and work will carry you to, the left hates it.

Most of us carry around a few more pounds than we should, and we also likely know someone who couldn’t gain an ounce on a dare. As you watch them eat a pound of fresh pasta and a slice of cake, while washing it down with a couple of beers, a voice in the back of your head mumbles some bitter words to yourself as you pretend the salad is better than it could ever be.

Jealousy is only human, even a small amount, no matter how much you may wish to deny it. But you aren’t ruled by it; it passes like gas after hitting the Taco Bell drive-thru.

Democrats, on the other hand, live there. Not in a constant state of gas (though that would explain quite a bit), but in a world of jealousy. They spend an inordinate and unhealthy amount of time worrying about what other people have and what they are doing. 

Elon Musk became a trillionaire last week, and my life wasn’t impacted in the least by that amazing accomplishment. His existence doesn’t cost me anything; his fortune was created out of nothing, not transferred from the accounts of others. Democrats either don’t understand this or gleefully exploit the ignorant who don’t.

But Musk’s life is the essence of America, and what Democrats use to protect every violent illegal alien criminal in the country. Imagine insisting that immigrants to the country (they always ignore the “illegal” part) are better than those of us born here, and are the reason our economy grows, while screaming out the other side of their mouths that the most successful business owner in world history should have the fruits of his labor ripped from him, tossed into prison, stripped of his citizenship and then deported. No rapist, no murderer, no Somali fraudster is reviled half as much as the man who created more millionaires than anyone else ever.

So much of what the Democrat Party is now revolves around envy. Sports reporting is done largely by that kid who never got over being picked last, and the rest of the news is reported by millionaires lamenting the existence of billionaires.

In the United States, even losers can make it if they apply themselves. Democrats tend not to. Apply themselves, that is, which makes them disproportionately losers and angry about it. If they burned half the calories that they waste whining on trying…actually, they’d still fail because they’re miserable people.

But maybe they wouldn’t hate the country so much if they stopped being angry about how it works and started trying to work within it? Probably not – they’re happier being a fish complaining about being wet than people one revelation away from changing their nature for the best. It’s who they are and why they hate the country.

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2026/06/15/heres-why-democrats-hate-america-n2677748?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-9DEpkwFg5p&utm_term=&_nlid=9DEpkwFg5p&_nhids=ncBXkIXMCMngls

Dem Accidentally Reveals Why We Should Never Vote for His Party

Dem Accidentally Reveals Why We Should Never Vote for His Party

AP Photo/Susan Walsh

The Democratic meltdown over Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire after the initial public offering (IPO) of SpaceX was something to see. 

We saw the bad reactions from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and the Democratic nominee for the Senate from Maine, the scandal-plagued Graham Platner. Platner even said that they should make sure that Musk was the last trillionaire. What an example of how they view success as bad, and they want to cut that off for the American people. Not to mention the radical leftist thought that they get to dictate to us what we can make.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said, "This was not sustainable." It wasn't clear what wasn't "sustainable" in that. He also decried it, saying we needed to "democratize the economy."  


READ MORE: Scary Stuff We Should Be Concerned About Beyond Platner's Tattoo

Gavin Newsom and Media Outlet Tag Team for Two Wild Takes on Elon Becoming a Trillionaire


Then Rep. Ro Khanna (CA-17), who has ambitions for the presidential race in 2028 and has been making a (bad) name for himself, excusing and embracing Platner, capped it off, showing just how bad Democrats are on the economy. He repeated his call for an additional 5 percent wealth tax on people making over a billion. What happened was a conversation with a variety of CEOS who know more about growing wealth than a Democrat in government does. 

Brad Gerstner, CEO of Altimeter Capital, explained what would have happened if they had grabbed Elon's capital gains from PayPal way back when. 

"You are smarter than this Ro.  Imagine if Bernie had taxed @elonmusk 100% on his PayPal capital gains.  We would have no @Tesla or @SpaceX - none of those jobs or GDP.  Who do you think allocated the capital better for society?  He will already pay $100 B + in taxes - more than any human ever." 

That's when Khanna responded: 

Brad, a 5% tax on Elon's trillion net worth would literally pay for free college and trade school for every American. 

 And with the market's growth, he still would be worth over a trillion dollars! 

You don't think that's worth it?

This would be out-and-out redistribution, a punishment for success, and the government wants to grab your money for "reasons" that never seem to get done. Plus, Elon has already probably paid more tax than anyone in history. But beyond that, as the Community Note explained, Khanna's math was way off. 

5% of $1.2T is $60b. 8m students in BA/BS programs on average pay over $20k/yr, or ~$160b/yr for BA/BS degrees only. That tax could not cover even half of only US bachelor degree costs for just 1 year, excluding grad, ass., or trade degrees totaling another ~10m students.

So not only is it bad policy, he's just wrong. But these are the folks in power who want to make our laws. 

CEO and Founder of @DRWTrading and @CumberlandSays, Don Wilson, said he was "highly confident society will derive greater benefit if that capital is in Elon’s hands than in the hands of the government." I think many of us would agree with that.

But Khanna kept digging that hole. 

This the basic difference.  

Republicans believe that that if you let the wealthy spend capital it will make Americans prosperous.  

Democrats believe that the federal government investing in the healthcare & education of our people will make America prosperous & productive.

Yes, that's the problem. 

Republicans believe that letting people keep their own money to spend as they will will produce more prosperity. Elon is a great example of that with everything his companies have created to benefit our world, and the hundreds of thousands of people he employs. Plus, his IPO was predicted to make 4400 current and former employees, just regular workers, millionaires. Talk about "democratizing the economy." When has the government ever done anything like that? 

Democrats think that "prosperity" comes from taking more of your money because they know how to spend it for you. I have to laugh at the "investing" part. Meanwhile, we see rampant fraud, such as in Minnesota. Give the government more money and power because that's worked so well — trust us, bro. How has that worked? Government involvement in healthcare and higher education has made everything more expensive. 

Khanna doesn't get it, but his comment is a great ad...against the Democrats. 

By the way, if he truly believes in a "wealth tax," why doesn't he contribute some of his many millions freely to the "cause"? I suspect we won't be seeing that anytime soon.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2026/06/14/ro-khanna-on-elon-musk-n2203335?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Elon Musk and the Politics of Envy

Elon Musk and the Politics of Envy

AP Photo/Chris Carlson

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know by now that with SpaceX’s Initial Public Offering (IPO), Elon Musk has become the world’s first trillionaire. The implications of this for all of us and our grandchildren are many and far-reaching. Of course, the left has found a way to narrow it all down to one simple idea: “His money is our money, or it should be.”

That’s not the way they say it. What leftists actually are saying is he doesn’t pay enough in taxes. Why? For the sole reason that he’s rich. If you’re a leftist, rich people are never paying “their fair share.”

This is the politics of envy, and if you study the vast majority of leftist messaging at any time on any topic, envy is a critical component. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that if the Democrats, and the left at large, decided to quit being jealous of the right, the left would die as a movement in less than 24 hours.

Envy is the lifeblood of leftist politics, and Musk is merely their latest, biggest, and most convenient target. But it’s worth being reminded that to the left, you are no different than Elon Musk. Let me explain.

The left is miserable when you’re happy. It feels entitled to be the only source of your happiness, but it has no desire to make you happy. Rather, it simply wants to control how happy it will allow you to be.

You saw this during the COVD-19 pandemic when the left rationed aspects of your previous life to you in small portions. The desire to control you in this way came from a fear that you might find a way to be happy in spite of conditions, in this case a pandemic. The thoroughness with which arbitrary measures were taken to deny you the simplest of pleasures was rooted in envy.

Around the same time and in the same environment, Black Lives Matter (BLM) and the whole entitlement movement accused you, if you were white, of having “white privilege” and and said that you don’t deserve to be happy. Instead, you should feel guilty because some on the left are unhappy. The “white privilege” guilt trip was not only one of the purest forms of the politics of envy, but it worked to get leftist and otherwise weak white people to voluntarily surrender their happiness.

At some point, almost all leftist politics comes back to envy.

And so, when Musk took SpaceX public and the company’s value skyrocketed (sorry, I couldn’t help myself), the left fell back on its most core strategy – the politics of envy.

Leftist billionaires and their pawns were well prepared to opportunistically try to capitalize on Musk’s good fortune with protest signs, messaging, and rent-a-mobs ready to go.

A union representing leftist college professors showed up alongside all the other envious union members, paid protestors, and disgruntled leftists, complete with their pre-printed signs. They were there to air their grievance that someone was having a good day and just might be happy.

Their signs alone showed an extremely high level of financial illiteracy and ignorance regarding just about everything related to the SpaceX IPO. They read: “Billionaires are a scam”; “Elon is stealing your pension"; “Overthrow the oligarchs”; “This billionaire is stealing from you”; “Elon is stealing your 401K”; and, of course, “Stop Elon. No Trillionaires.”

Since the signs were pre-printed and funded by the usual funders of anything good for America, we can only assume that the evil strategists on the left conceived of these messages because they knew the phrases would appeal to their illiterate base.

First off, how could Elon making money from willing investors represent him stealing your pension? There is no relationship at all, and there can’t be. The money Musk and everyone else made from the IPO came from the market, not from unwilling American citizens or taxpayers. It came from institutional investors through mutual and index funds, universities, large pension funds, and millions of willing individual investors. People invested because they hoped to make profits at some later point. The protestors either don’t understand that, or they pretend not to.

Another sign that actually sidesteps all rational thought is the one that says Elon is stealing your 401(k). The truth is, the SpaceX IPO very likely already helped your 401(k), and if it didn’t, it soon will. Many, if not most of the big mutual funds are riding on the fortunes of a handful of companies like Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, maybe Tesla, and Alphabet. SpaceX just joined the club.

That means if you have a 401(k), it’s in your best interest to want SpaceX to do well. That can only grow your retirement savings. And then there’s that argument the left makes when it has no argument: “Stop Elon. No Trillionaires.”

Why? I mean, really, why? What’s the point? If someone else becomes rich and it has no effect on you, why should you even care? I mean, other than pure jealousy.

That post from Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.) is rich, literally. She’s playing upon jealousy and envy to encourage more taxation, but only of the rich, so we're told (for now). They play this “lower effective tax rate” game to try to pretend Elon doesn’t pay a ton of taxes, which he does.

Also, like the financially illiterate protestors in New York, Jacobs is drawing no distinction between income, which is taxed, and assets like stock, which only convert into taxable money if you sell shares.

What makes Jacobs’ post curious is that she is one of the richest people in Congress. She’s got an estimated net worth of $76 million, and she didn’t earn any of it. She was born into it. If ever there is such a thing as privilege, she’s got it. Her father is billionaire Irwin Jacobs, who founded semiconductor company Qualcomm. So, when she demonizes Elon for being a billionaire, or now a trillionaire, she’s pretty much demonizing her own daddy, and she’s not doing herself any favors. She just wants you to think she’s one of the good kind of millionaires. 

What’s obvious is she wants you to feel like a “have not,” and she wants you to hate Elon simply because he’s a “have.”

Something Jacobs did not do and would not do is acknowledge all those who have immediately benefited from the SpaceX IPO. A lot of leftists are making money here.

The University of North Carolina, Washington University in St. Louis, and the University of Virginia bought in early and have huge stakes in the company.

According to Fortune, “In total, more than 4,400 current and former SpaceX employees are expected to become millionaires in the IPO.”

My colleague, David Manney, reported on how some of Musk's loyal employees at different levels of the company will be rewarded

SpaceX counts 22,000 employees at the moment, and all of them pay taxes. The average salary of SpaceX employees is $155,000-$176,000, according to the company. All of these people pay local, state and federal taxes. Many, if not most, pay property taxes. Those who just made millions each on the IPO will ultimately pay a collective billions more in federal taxes. That means more money headed into the local, state, and federal piggy banks.

Over time, millions of individual investors will make profits on their SpaceX stock at some point, and they will pay taxes on the profit.

The point is, the government will see its share of cash from the IPO, and it didn’t have to do a thing except sit back and wait for the profits to roll in. Yet, Democrats like Jacobs and the rest of the left somehow want you to feel like only Musk is the beneficiary of the IPO.

That’s not stopping the left from engaging in envy porn. Check out this post from millionaire Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), decrying the rich as she rides in the back of her limo.

Or this common refrain that attempts to blame Musk for people putting themselves on government entitlement programs that you, the taxpayer, pay for anyway. In other words, people getting free stuff are big mad that Musk is winning. Since he’s making more money, naturally, they want more free stuff…just because.

That poster blamed Musk for just about every economic challenge anyone in America could face, but one thing he posted that deserves to be addressed is this notion that Musk is getting federal handouts to make his money at SpaceX. As though  he's running a non-profit that doesn't reward the federal government. His rockets are the delivery system for satellites that protect our national security, among many other things. Oh, and remember the time NASA couldn't rescue those astronauts, so Musk had to bail out the government?

It all comes back to envy. It’s the foundation of the left’s push for reparations over slavery, not that 360,000 dead union soldiers counted for anything. It’s behind the way the left uses climate change to take away your SUV or even your gas stove.

It’s not about the climate. It’s never about the climate. It’s always about taking way the things you like to take away your happiness. In the process, it will try to control your happiness to control you. It has to make its base envious of you in order to find the support it needs to take away your money, your stuff, and your freedoms. It has to be able to make a case that you deserve to have things taken away from you. Envy is a prerequisite.

Projection is when the left accuses you of doing the very thing it’s doing. When it accuses Musk of getting rich at the public’s expense, it’s exposing how it always seeks to use envy to take someone’s money and freedoms away.

Musk isn’t trying to steal your retirement, but the left is, through higher taxes, higher regulation, and ultimately a higher cost of living. To keep its racket up, it just needs you to look over there at the rich guy and be jealous of him. If it can get you to do that, you’ll never notice how it’s taking away your freedom and your money right out from under your nose. At the same time, it will get you to actually support its oppressive policies and programs designed to hurt Musk. But eventually they’ll come for you. Envy is the secret sauce to all of it.

https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/06/14/elon-musk-and-the-politics-of-envy-n4953968

A New Study Just Confirmed the Left's Worst-Kept Secret

A New Study Just Confirmed the Left's Worst-Kept Secret

It's an older meme but it checks out.

If you've spent any time arguing with liberals online, you already know this. Now there's a study to prove it.

Decades of research have shown that political conservatives report better mental health and greater happiness than their counterparts on the left. A new study published in the journal Political Behavior takes that finding a step further, finding that “mental illness is emerging as its own political identity and is most heavily aligned with leftist political ideology and causes,” and that it clusters heavily among younger, far-left Americans.

Shocking, I know.

Columbia University's magazine noted back in 2023 that "American adults who identify as politically liberal have long reported lower levels of happiness and psychological well-being than conservatives.” However, researchers spent years scratching their heads over why. Scholars from the Universities of Florida and Toronto eventually took a crack at it, drawing on four separate studies. Their conclusion? Conservatives tend to have greater personal agency, religiosity, moral clarity, a positive outlook, and stronger self-worth… which are traits consistently linked to resilience and mental health. In other words, having a sense of purpose and taking responsibility for your life is good for you. Who knew?

Professor Lauren Van De Hey of Utah State University has conducted research that connects the mental health gap directly to political identity formation. Her findings were drawn from the 2022 Cooperative Election Study, a large, nationally representative survey administered by YouGov.

"I further find that there is an emerging mental health political identity that is most pronounced among younger (Gen Z) and more liberal Americans," Van De Hey said.

Roughly half of the study participants who identified as having a mental illness said that identity was very important or somewhat important to them personally. Yeah, that's a voting bloc in the making.

Van De Hey also found that mental health identity operates differently in politics than physical disability or serious physical illness. "I find that the political predictors and political consequences for the emerging mental health identity differ from those for physical disability and serious physical illness categorization and identification," she said. The implication is clear: mental health struggles, increasingly worn as badges of identity, carry huge political weight.

ICYMI: Bakari Sellers Calls Elon Musk a White Supremacist, and All Hell Breaks Loose

The study also found that conservatives are less likely than liberals to categorize anxiety and depression as mental health conditions and report seeking treatment at lower rates. Van De Hey attributes this to a "personal responsibility ethos: they do not seek help when they think they can resolve the issues on their own." The left will frame that as denial. Conservatives will frame it as actually handling your problems. You can decide which sounds healthier.

Gee, who would have guessed that the same political movement that spent years turning gender into a political identity is now running the same play with mental illness?

Van De Hey's study draws that connection explicitly, pointing to gender politics as a precedent for how subjective personal struggles can become major political drivers. Make no mistake about it, this is by design. The left has a formula, and they're running it again and again.

Her conclusions don't sugarcoat what's coming, either. "These findings have far-reaching consequences for mental health advocacy, and the role mental health identity will play in the political sphere — especially as Gen Z matures as a cohort," she wrote. And she's right, though probably not in the way she intends. When emotional struggles become the foundation of political organizing, the incentive structure flips. You don't get better outcomes. You get a movement with every reason to keep people anxious, dependent, and radicalized.

And you wonder why leftists are so crazy?

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/06/14/a-new-study-just-confirmed-the-lefts-worst-kept-secret-n4953961?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-xjpCamnGGQ&utm_term=&_nlid=xjpCamnGGQ&_nhids=ncBXkIXMCMngls

The Karmelo Anthony Problem

The Karmelo Anthony Problem

Left, Karmello Anthony, Collin County Jail/Right, Austin Metcalf, family handout

On April 2, 2025, Karmelo Anthony went to Memorial High School looking for a fight. Though he was participating in a track meet, he felt the need to bring a knife in his backpack. Once at the school, he sat in the tent of the opposing team. When confronted by Austin Metcalf, who told him to leave, Anthony reached into his backpack and said, “Touch me and see what happens.” Metcalf then grabbed Anthony in an attempt to forcibly move him out of the tent. Anthony then used his knife to stab Metcalf in the heart, killing him almost instantly.

Touch me and see what happens. This is the ethos for which Anthony was willing to murder an innocent boy.

On paper, Anthony sounded as if he were a model citizen with a bright future. Coming from a stable, two-parent household, he was the captain of his own school’s track and football teams. He worked two part-time jobs and was a straight A student. At the time of his crime, he was a month away from graduation, and was planning on going to college. Until the moment he plunged his knife into Metcalf’s chest, he had never had any incidents with law enforcement.

What are we to make of this? How are we supposed to understand how someone as seemingly normal as Karmelo Anthony was willing, in a manner of seconds, to destroy the lives of others, not to mention his own life, over such a petty argument?

Touch me and see what happens. Anthony didn’t develop this ethos on his own. There is a sickness in black subculture in contemporary America, and the sickness is this: Too many young black males are immersed in a socio-racial ideology that glorifies violence, preaches that only the meanest dog on the block wins, and dictates that any perceived threat from anyone who “steps up to me” must be countered with a wildly disproportionate, overwhelming response.

With regards to this latter point, the sole purpose of a disproportionate, overwhelming response is to serve as a warning not only to the victim, but to whoever else is watching or who is later made aware of this incident. If pushing me results in me murdering you, people far and wide will think twice before “stepping up” to me. My reputation as an unpredictable, uncontrollable animal is forged and serves my interests in the long run, even if I’m punished in the short run.

Let us be honest. This sickness is prevalent among young black males more than any other group. The statistics don’t lie. And because of this sickness, and because of foot soldiers such as Karmelo Anthony willing to follow its orders, the result will likewise be predictable. People avoid sickness. And though Anthony will spend the next 35 years in quarantine, so to speak, there are still potentially millions of other infected carriers.

This sickness is evident in the Black Lives Matter riots that burned down entire cities and left dozens of innocent people dead. The sickness is evident in the almost exclusively black flash mobs that take over streets, malls, and beaches. The sickness is evident in the 20-person brawls that break out at Waffle Houses, in casino lobbies, and in Carnival cruise check-in lines. The sickness is evident in every attempt to resist law enforcement, and every escalation of a situation that in no way necessitated escalating. The sickness is evident in the Treyvon Martins and Eric Garners and Michael Browns and Jacob Blakes and Anton Sterlings who respond to any and all adversity with hyper-aggressive violence.

Whatever may be the incidental motivations for these crimes, underlying them is the darker, subconscious message. Don’t come near me. I’m not rational, and you can’t talk me down. I’m a rabid pit bull, and the more you anger me, the harder I’ll stomp you. I don’t follow rules, and you’d be wise to just stay out of my way.

This sickness festers like gangrene and rots the entire subculture, regardless of its other admirable components. A toxic mixture of never-ending racial grievance and a perverse pride in the urban “gangsta” lifestyle incubates, encourages, and spreads it. It’s the pathetic selfies holding the handgun in one hand and a wad of money in the other. It’s the bass-bumping car stereos through the neighborhood at midnight. It’s the infantile “statement” clothing, assuming it’s the correct size.

The problem with this messaging, aimed primarily if not exclusively toward the “white” dominant culture, is that the message is received exactly as intended. Don’t go near him. He’s not rational, and I can’t talk him down. He’s a rabid pit bull, and the more I anger him, the harder he’ll stomp me. He doesn’t follow rules, and I’d be wise to just stay out of his way.

And so, because of the Karmelo Anthonys and Treyvon Martins and Michael Browns, all black men are implicated. That’s obscenely unfair to innocent black men, but it’s also an unavoidable reaction of human beings. A black man in the Reconstruction South in the 1870’s would understandably avoid gatherings of young, loud, boisterous white men, especially at night. And it wouldn’t be because that black man was “racist.” It would be because enough gatherings of young white men had resulted in death or serious bodily injury for black men that it was prudent for black men to give such gatherings as wide a berth as possible. Sure, not every gathering of young white men was ill-intended towards black men, but the risk wasn’t worth one’s life.

That same mindset is at work today. People instinctively avoid gatherings of young black males. And not only do people avoid them, people also avoid confronting them in the same way they would confront a young male of any other race. If a young black male is acting up in a restaurant, or on a subway, or in a movie theater, or near a playground in my neighborhood, do I lower my gaze and pretend it isn’t happening? Or do I say something to him and risk getting stabbed to death?

And while these thugs might feel they’re doing other black people a favor by further manifesting their “street cred” to the rest of America, the fact is that they are hurting all black people in the long run. Sure, no white people will intervene when you behave like a feral animal at the local McDonalds. But because of you, nor will white people (or any other race of people, for that matter) move to your neighborhoods. Or invest in your communities. Or hire you for jobs. Or teach in your schools. Or ever trust you enough to breathe easy.

Touch me and see what happens. What happens is that the entire black community suffers, because of your need to act out your sophomoric “thug life” fantasy. What happens is that innocent people, both white and black, are murdered because they “disrespected” you.

Only black America, and black America alone, can eradicate this sickness. No government program or study group or reparation payment will fix this. This sickness has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with slavery, or Jim Crow, or any racial grievance, real or invented. This sickness is purely organic.

There is absolutely a light at the end of the tunnel, but it will require some serious soul-searching and a good, hard look in the mirror. It will require overcoming not only the “gangsta rap” culture of violence and brutal social Darwinism, but also the racist undertones affecting black America.

If a white man and a black man get into a fight, I don’t automatically side with the white man just because he’s white. If I were on a jury, I would look at all available evidence and try to make an informed judgement based on the knowledge available to me about who was at fault. But the crowd of Karmelo Anthony supporters outside the courthouse clearly don’t examine problems through any lens except the lens of racial grievance. Theirs is a knee-jerk reaction to defend black criminality, not on the grounds of objective evidence, but solely on the grounds that being black gives the defendant the moral approval to exist free from the constraints of the moral order. There is no other term for this mindset other than racism.

This racism ripples back to where it usually begins, i.e. the halls of academia. “Scholars” such as Harvard professor Stacey Patton blaming the murder victim because his father never taught him that “black boys have boundaries” will only further isolate the black community. Until black America confronts, defeats, and transcends both the racist and self-destructive elements of black subculture, it will continue to be its own worst enemy.

Despite what your “leaders” and racial-ambulance-chasing lawyers tell you in the press conferences, and despite what you see on Netflix, white America wants you to succeed. There are no hidden armies of hooded white supremacists just waiting for you to let your guard down. Rather, there are everyday, normal white people who share the goals, values, and hopes for their children as do everyday, normal black people. It’s the ones calling you a “sellout” for your achievements that you shouldn't trust.

We want you at our parties and at our barbecues. We want to talk over the fence and hear how well your son is doing at university, or in his new career, or on his honeymoon vacation. We want a true, honest friendship with you that you don’t forget exists the moment another black person enters the room.

But that won’t happen until you extend an open hand rather than a closed fist. It won’t happen so long as the baseless paranoia and resentment and hate continues to smolder. Bigots such as Cardi B and Jasmine Crockett are intentionally fanning the flames of vulgar tribalism, because this is how they get paid. But you… not them… you have to distinguish between what the honest side of you actually believes about us and what the deceptive side of you wants to believe about us.

Touch us, and see what happens. Most likely, you’ll get a smile, a handshake, an invitation. I guarantee you won’t get a knife in the chest.

The ball is in your court.

https://pjmedia.com/aj-christopher/2026/06/13/the-karmelo-anthony-problem-n4953923?utm_source=twdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Dems Routinely Call Us Nazis but Soil Their Diapers If We Insult Them

Dems Routinely Call Us Nazis but Soil Their Diapers If We Insult Them

Kenny Holston/The New York Times via AP, Pool

Top O' the Briefing

Happy Tuesday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Hortyllbiszt felt that he was emotionally ready to shine as the Braunschweiger Taquito King of the Tri-County Regional Fair.

Another day, another glimpse into the diseased minds of 2026 American Democrats. Hey, I've got to work with the material that's given to me, and there's certainly a lot on this front being offered these days. I have to frequently remind myself that I know people on the left who don't behave like rabid animals. None of them are in politics, though.

At the national, coastal level, Democrats have to be openly hostile and hateful towards Republicans to have any clout with the party higher-ups. They'll insist that it's only about President Trump, but their hatred for those of us who support him has become just as strong. 

The Democratic National Committee and the other party elites place a big premium on anger now. Foul-mouthed anger gets Dems extra time in front of cameras. They love talking about politicians who will "fight." If anybody fights back, however, they get very emtotional and act as if they've been paragons of civility all along. 

Matt wrote about the source of their latest wearisome outrage:

UFC heavyweight Josh Hokit had himself a night. He stopped Derrick Lewis by technical knockout at UFC Freedom 250, an event President Donald Trump hosted at the White House, and then made sure nobody would be talking about the fight itself. After thanking Trump for putting it together, Hokit closed out his post-fight interview with Joe Rogan by announcing, “Michelle Obama is a man, am I right, America?"

This has been quite the triggering event for the left, obviously. Mr. and Mrs. Lightbringer are the closest things to deities that the rabidly secular Democrats have anymore. 

For those of us on the right, there are few people in America who are less sympathetic than Michelle Obama. In the almost 10 years since she and her husband moved out of the White House, Mrs. Obama has used her platform to repeatedly disparage the United States of America. She's forever finding new ways to be insufferable and, not surprisingly, she's not a fan of Republicans. 

So, if her feelings get hurt by some UFC rando, I'm not going to be reaching for any tissues. 

Actually, given how nasty the Trump Derangement Syndrome Democrats have been, I don't think that there are too many bad things that can be said about them or their sacred cows these days. They call us racists, Nazis, and stupid over and over. I've had "tolerant" Democrat friends stop speaking to me. I did the whole "above the fray" thing for a long time and they all got worse. 

I'm quite happy to be down in the gutter with them for a while now. It would be good if I didn't have to stay here forever, but it's the best way to convey messages to the other side for the moment. 

Related: If You Can't Say Something Nice About Someone, You Must Be Talking About a Democrat

The mere mention of even voting Republican risks inviting unhinged resistance even in casual situations. We don't respond in kind to Democrats. It's not surprising that conservatives feel like blowing off steam when we finally find ourselves surrounded by like-minded individuals, however impolitely. Truthfully, calling Michelle Obama a man isn't one of the nastier things that could be said about her. She and her husband have been poisoning the American political conversation since they first rose to power. The Democrats who have the least decorum tend to rise to the top. 

Perhaps some of them should try being decent human beings for once if they want us to stop disparaging them. 

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/06/15/the-morning-briefing-dems-routinely-call-us-nazis-but-soil-their-diapers-if-we-insult-them-n4954008?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-NjBAWtDNDg&utm_term=&_nlid=NjBAWtDNDg&_nhids=nc40pCY4Hp4qls