Sunday, June 21, 2026

Brad Thor’s 'Choke Point' Proves Scot Harvath Is Still the Gold Standard of the Political Thriller

Brad Thor’s 'Choke Point' Proves Scot Harvath Is Still the Gold Standard of the Political Thriller

Brad Thor’s 'Choke Point' Proves Scot Harvath Is Still the Gold Standard of the Political Thriller
"Choke Point" by Brad Thor

The wars of the 21st century will not typically begin with the brutalist modalities of armies crossing borders or missiles flying across the horizon. More often, they will unfold quietly—in cyberspace, through economic coercion, by means of information warfare, or through covert efforts designed to destabilize societies from within.

Asymmetry will shape the future, with kinetic actions manipulated by AI systems, and information mechanisms dominated by illusions, and great deceptions created by minds made of silicon—inherent with the baffling subtleties of superposition.

Few contemporary thriller writers understand that uncomfortable reality better than Brad Thor.

With “Choke Point,” his 25th novel featuring legendary operative Scot Harvath, Thor once again demonstrates why he remains one of the most insightful voices in modern political fiction. Like Tom Clancy before him, Thor possesses a rare ability to take emerging geopolitical realities and transform them into a story that is both immensely entertaining and uncomfortably plausible. That realism is no accident.

During our conversation, Thor explained that he does not begin with action sequences or exotic locations. He begins with a geopolitical question.

I always wrap my books around some big geopolitical set piece,” Thor told Townhall. I call what I do faction, where you dont know where the facts end and the fiction begins.”

For “Choke Point,” that question centered on Chinas strategic ambitions in Southeast Asia. Thor became fascinated by Chinas desire to bypass the Strait of Malacca, a narrow maritime passage through which much of its commerce and energy supply flows. Thailand had resisted Chinese efforts to create a canal through the Kra Isthmus, preserving a strategic vulnerability that American naval power could exploit in a future conflict.

The novelists imagination then asked a question that intelligence professionals have long understood is often the beginning of a dangerous scenario: What happens when a powerful adversary cannot achieve its objective through persuasion?

What if the Chinese figured out a way to make things so unstable in Thailand that another military coup took place?” Thor told Townhall.

That question becomes the foundation for a thriller rooted not merely in military conflict, but in the far more complex world of covert influence, deniable operations, and political destabilization.

As a retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent who spent years working counterintelligence matters, I found this aspect of “Choke Point” particularly compelling. Modern adversaries rarely seek to defeat the United States in a conventional battle. They seek to weaken our alliances, exploit our divisions, and convince Americans to distrust one another.

Thor articulated that danger with remarkable clarity.

Our enemies want to create disunity,” he told Townhall. They benefit when were at each others throats because it erodes our confidence in ourselves as citizens and in our nation.”

The novels greatest surprise, however, may be its antagonist. After 25 books, the challenge for any author is creating an enemy who feels genuinely dangerous. Thor accomplishes that by making Harvaths opponent not a foreign terrorist but an American—a former Navy SEAL whose exceptional training and tragic fall from grace make him a mirror image of the hero pursuing him.

The concept itself grew from Thors fascination with a real military pipeline in which exceptionally capable Explosive Ordnance Disposal personnel were recruited to attempt Basic Underwater Demolition School (BUDS), the incredibly rigorous selection process for Navy SEALs. The result is a villain whose expertise exceeds even Harvaths in certain areas, particularly explosives, making him a uniquely formidable opponent.

Yet Thor avoids the trap of creating a one-dimensional villain. The best antagonists are often those whose motivations the reader can understand, even if their actions cannot be justified. This enemy is not a caricature of evil. He is a man who lost his identity when he lost the uniform and brotherhood that defined his life. That complexity has always distinguished Thors writing.

Early in the novel, after the bombing in Bangkok, Harvath expresses confidence in the FBIs Evidence Response Team with a line that immediately caught my attention: Theyre the best. If anyone can get to the bottom of this, its the Bureau.”

As someone who spent 20 years serving in the FBI, I appreciated that moment. At a time when public conversations about the Bureau are frequently dominated by political controversies, Thor portrays the organization with reference to the thousands of agents, analysts, scientists, and professional staff who quietly dedicate their lives to protecting the nation.

Its a tremendous organization that has done so much good for our country,” Thor told Townhall. I think the world of the men and women that work tirelessly to keep us safe.”

Perhaps the most revealing moment of our conversation came when I asked Thor what he had learned about Scot Harvath after writing the character for a quarter century. His answer revealed the deeper philosophy behind the entire series. There is no American Dream without those willing to protect it,” Thor told Townhall. It doesnt exist.”

That may be the single sentence that best explains why readers have followed Scot Harvath through 25 novels.

Harvath is not simply an action hero. He represents the enduring warrior ethos—courage, loyalty, discipline, and the willingness to enter dangerous places so that others can live safely.

“Choke Point” delivers everything longtime readers expect from a Brad Thor thriller: international intrigue, sophisticated intelligence tradecraft, a compelling villain, and relentless pacing. More importantly, it accomplishes what the best political thrillers always do. It entertains while forcing readers to think seriously about the threats that exist beyond the headlines.

Twenty-five novels after “The Lions of Lucerne” introduced Scot Harvath to readers, Brad Thor has proven that his greatest creation still has much to say about the world we inhabit—and the men and women who stand watch over it.

“Choke Point” is on sale today wherever books are sold! Also, don’t miss my long-form interview with Brad Thor about “Choke Point” here! 

https://townhall.com/columnists/johnnantz/2026/06/17/brad-thors-choke-point-proves-scot-harvath-is-still-the-gold-standard-of-the-political-thriller-n2677892?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-ce3HvvNTNu&utm_term=&_nlid=ce3HvvNTNu&_nhids=ncGAXFpNCjebls

Savages vs. Civilization

Savages vs. Civilization

Savages vs. Civilization
AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez

Karmelo Anthony—his first name sounds like some off-brand 99 Cent Store nougat confection—is going to prison for 35 years, and he is relatively lucky. He is lucky he does not live in a society that treats monsters appropriately. A civilized society does not tolerate his brand of sociopathy. It executes such criminals—not only as righteous retribution and not only as an example to others, but as an act of societal hygiene. For a millennium, Europe hanged, beheaded, or otherwise dispatched about 1 percent of its male population every year for various crimes, and you know what? After a while, there were not that many more criminals left. European society was remarkably peaceful as far as crime, if not as far as war. But we moderns decided to go another way. We decided this was too harsh. We decided this was too mean. So, we decided to tolerate nonsense, and it is no surprise what has happened. The kindness to criminals has, inevitably, turned into cruelty to the innocent.

But the defenders of this kind of moral illiteracy are shameless, and in the wake of Karmelo Anthony’s just conviction, they have been not just stupid but loud. We have been bombarded by outright evil attempting to excuse his crime. They advocate special rules for black men that everybody else must honor, which involves letting them misbehave but never confronting them about it, or they might murder you. All of which is just fine with the critics, but it is not just fine with the rest of us. Karmelo Anthony bought into this morally bankrupt foolishness, and now two lives are over, and two families are ruined—though Karmelo Anthony’s family seems to be doing OK with its GoFundMe.

There is a culture clash in America going on between models of public behavior. The primarily European model of public consideration for others is one in which you do not try to dominate public spaces and where you are aware of and considerate of other people who are present. And then there is the Third World model, which we are all experiencing more and more, and we are getting pretty damn tired of it. That is one where interactions in public spaces are a test of power. Can you be obnoxious and get away with it?

We are seeing this a lot lately in various forms. How about the idiots who think it is a great idea to turn on their phones' speakers and have loud conversations in public? We have reached the point on airplanes where we must remind people that they need to use headphones if they are going to be listening to music or videos. Were these people raised by wolves? Some of them are obviously stupid. Some are retaining the habits of their garbage homelands. But for others, it is a way of showing they are the boss and daring others to stop them. That is what the black father in Brooklyn did when some idiot was shouting into his phone. He told the guy to stop, and the guy murdered him.

The unspoken but evident potential for violence in these situations is a feature, not a bug. Like Karmelo Anthony, many of these people are looking for trouble. They want it. And normal people have a decision to make. They can let it go, but then the troublemaker wins—at least that passes for an achievement in these unaccomplished losers’ lives—but it grates on normal folks. Or you can intervene and then maybe get murdered, or if you fight back and win, suddenly you are the criminal. Remember that lunatic on the subway who was threatening people, and then the Marine grabbed him, put him in a chokehold, and he gacked? The Marine got put on trial for murder. So, are you going to put your livelihood, liberty, and life on the line because some idiot is shouting on public transportation? Sadly, society does not have your back if you do. That is because people in positions of power in our society want you, as a normal, civilized person, to suffer at the hands of degenerates. The race hustlers and stupid liberal wine women who excuse away the pathologies of barbarians while crying about the discipline of the civilized hate you and want you to be abused.

These two models of behavior are incompatible. You can either have a civilized society, or you can have a Third World society and everything that comes along with it. For a long time, we have been tolerating Third World behavior. But that seems to be ending. People are calling out this problem, including the racial aspects, which was unprecedented until the left normalized it. Now, the civilized are striking back, and they really do not care if you call them racist because they do not want to put up with idiots acting the fool in public.

In the case of Karmelo Anthony, he decided he was going to be a jerk and go into someone else’s area and dare people to stand up to his crap. Well, Austin Metcalf stood up to him, so he took that as a threat to his manhood and murdered Austin Metcalf without a second thought. That kind of Third World idiocy is endemic to much of the world. And, not coincidentally, where it is endemic, there is poverty, chaos, corruption, and general misery. A society where you cannot discipline yourself to not be a jerk and where you must constantly test all of those around you to prove your own manhood is one that does not go to the moon. Instead, it goes down to the polluted river with a plastic bucket that was imported, because your trash country does not make anything, to get cholera-laden water to carry back to your hut.

So, it works out poorly on a societal level, but it also works out poorly for individuals. For instance, Karmelo Anthony is about to have his manhood tested the hard way for the next 35 years in the prison shower.

We keep hearing about how a multicultural society is wonderful, but it is not wonderful in the sense that you cannot have competing cultures. You cannot have one culture of civilized behavior and another culture of savagery coexisting. There are two choices: surrender or fight back. But the surrender paradigm is no longer working. We are no longer going to tolerate Karmelo Anthonys murdering people because of some perverted street honor code. There was a much-seen clip of some protester outside the court asking what she was supposed to tell her five sons in the wake of Karmelo Anthony’s conviction, and the unanimous response—including from many black commentators—was that she should tell her sons not to go around murdering people.

We are done accepting excuses. We are done accepting bad behavior. There is no racial debt that must be paid back in the blood of innocents. Those of us of a certain age have seen the coming backlash before, after liberals have normalized and tolerated crime for a while. Inevitably, the tough-on-crime politicians get elected and impose tough-on-crime policies. But what is different this time is that the people are calling this out for what it is. As his supporters have made clear, Karmelo Anthony thought he had a special kind of street code that gave him a free pass to butcher anybody who pointed out his obnoxious public behavior. Well, we reject that, and you can call us all the names you want. It does not work anymore. Some amorphous sense of collective guilt is not going to convince us to agree to being murdered. The consensus is developing that we need to stop putting up with this behavior and start putting people in jail for a long, long time. Now, of course, that is the moderate solution. The real solution is to start promptly executing criminals even as we purge our institutions of this bizarre desire to justify Third World social chaos. Don't underestimate the potential viciousness of the backlash that is on the way. The thuggish likes of Karmelo Anthony are going to force open an Overton window and are then going to be thrown out of it.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2026/06/17/savages-vs-civilization-n2677860?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-fPMN8Zg9jv&utm_term=&_nlid=fPMN8Zg9jv&_nhids=nc1pYurXhz4kls

Saturday, June 20, 2026

Newsom Is Under DOJ Investigation. Here's Why That's Good News.

Newsom Is Under DOJ Investigation. Here's Why That's Good News.

AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is whining about the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) investigating him. And given the number of crimes and potential crimes to which he and his administration are connected, that is not surprising, but rather long overdue.

"Justice is for sale," Newsom trumpeted in a video he posted June 15, complaining that the DOJ investigation of him now extends to his wife, who is involved in multiple scandals involving taxpayer money allocation and sexual grooming of children. Newsom did not actually state what the charges are against him and his wife, probably because they don't really have a defense. Instead, Newsom rambled on with grandiose claims of integrity, sobbing condemnations of the investigation into his wife, irrelevant facts about Donald Trump's net worth, and promotion of his own tentative campaign for president. But while Gavin wasn't honest about the charges against him and Jennifer Siebel Newsom, I can share a number of reasons why the DOJ might be looking into the political power couple.

Interestingly, in May, Newsom's former chief of staff and Dem gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra's former advisor, Dana Williamson, pleaded guilty to corruption-related charges. Semafor's White House correspondent Shelby Talcott claims an unnamed source stated that the DOJ's representatives in Sacramento are investigating Newsom primarily because of charges related to Williamson, while his wife is under scrutiny for potential tax-related crimes. The DOJ did not confirm this report.

The reason many Americans are talking about California corruption right now is the proven illegal ballot harvesting and potential election-changing fraud after the recent primary elections for governor and mayor of Los Angeles. At least one individual, Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong, recently pleaded guilty to spending decades bribing homeless people to register to vote and often using her own address so she could receive their ballots. The California Post also obtained video showing homeless people saying they accepted money in exchange for casting ballots for L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, and that ballot harvesters frequently bribe homeless people.

Related: Steve Hilton Bashes Failed Governance, Drunken Spending, Overregulation in California

Bill Essayli, U.S. assistant attorney for the central district of California, is currently investigating allegations of election fraud in the state. Therefore, Newsom's government is under scrutiny for election shenanigans.

And, of course, Newsom's government faces lawsuits related to management of the 2025 Palisades fire and pre-fire prevention measures.

One crime that I can say with confidence we could bring against Newsom is violating federal immigration laws. 18 U.S. Code § 111 forbids interfering with federal immigration officers, while 8 U.S. Code § 1324 bans harboring or concealing illegal aliens. Newsom openly boasts about his sanctuary policies and efforts to provide taxpayer funds to illegal aliens. He also refuses to honor ICE detainer requests for criminal aliens. Unfortunately, he's not likely to see any accountability on that score.

Siebel Newsom likewise has a number of scandals on her record. L.A. mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt accused Siebel Newsom of appropriating taxpayer money for fire victims through a sketchy "nonprofit." The California government denied the claims but inadvertently confirmed that the nonprofit in question does in fact collaborate with Siebel Newsom and the state government. Last August, activists accused Gov. Newsom of “funneling taxpayer dollars” through his wife’s nonprofit to her for-profit business, which financially benefited the Newsom family.

Siebel Newsom bragged about her efforts to indoctrinate children — both hers and strangers' — into seeing masculinity as toxic. "If I'm reading a book and the protagonist is a male, I just change the he to a she," she boasted in a video. Also, in 2023, Open the Books accused Siebel Newsom’s nonprofit, The Representation Project, of making a whopping $1.48 million off film screening revenue since 2012. Schools across all 50 United States paid for the films, which included graphic pornography.

So if the DOJ is investigating the Newsoms, it's fully deserved. The governor and "first partner" have numerous questionable actions and policies on their record.

https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2026/06/15/newsom-is-under-doj-investigation-heres-why-thats-good-news-n4954000?utm_source=breakingemail&utm_medium=email&tpcc=breaking061626

JD Vance Just Gave Jessica Tarlov a Patriotism Lesson She Won’t Forget

JD Vance Just Gave Jessica Tarlov a Patriotism Lesson She Won’t Forget

AP Photo/Erik S. Lesser

Watching Greg Gutfeld and Jesse Watters take turns dismantling Jessica Tarlov's talking points on The Five is one of my not-so-guilty pleasures. But Tuesday delivered something even better: Vice President JD Vance stepped into the ring himself, and within seconds, he exposed a glaring blind spot in how the left thinks about loving your own country.

Tarlov tried to explain away a brutal new NBC News poll on American patriotism by chalking it up to simple political math. "Some of it is obviously partisan," she said, arguing that pride in the country naturally dips "when your party's out of power."

"I don't think that's right," Vance said. "Why does that need to be true? That if your party's out of power, you should have less pride in your country?"

He didn't stop there. Vance pointed out that Republicans never operated this way, even when they hated who was in the White House. "I guarantee that when Barack Obama was president or Joe Biden was pretending to be president, that you had Republicans who still said they're proud of America, they're proud of our military, they're proud of the great people of our country, they're proud of our natural beauty," he said.

Then came the gut punch. Vance cited the new NBC News polls, which found that only 29% of Democrats currently say they're proud of their country, and he wasn't shy about where he thinks the blame belongs. 

"What seems to me so bizarre about this is that we've allowed a culture to develop where people feel like the country is the country's politics," he said. He went further, tying that mindset to something darker: "I think that's actually connected to the violent rhetoric where if you disagree with somebody, you can justify killing them. It's really, really a bad thing."

He added, "I wish Democrats, all of them, were proud of our country. We should be proud of our country."

Vance was 100% correct. The NBC News survey released Sunday confirms exactly the kind of partisan rot he was describing. Just 56% of Americans overall say they're "extremely" or "very" proud to be American, while 29% report having little or no national pride whatsoever. The split by party is staggering: 90% of Republicans say they're proud of their country, compared to only 29% of Democrats. Age makes it worse. Roughly three-quarters of Americans 65 and older feel proud of the country, but that number collapses to just 36% among adults 18 to 34.

Related: Greg Gutfeld Humiliates Jessica Tarlov Again While Exposing the Left's Double Standard

And here's the part Democrats really don't want to hear: voters think their party cares more about hating Trump than building anything. The same survey found that, overall, voters said Democrats are too focused on opposing Trump by a six-point margin. Among swing voters, the people Democrats desperately need to win back, that margin exploded to 23 points.

Tarlov tried to dress up Democrat anti-Americanism as a normal political mood swing. But Vance had the receipts and proved her wrong. It’s Democrats who are driving down the patriotism numbers in this country, and it’s because they’re out of power. When 71% of Democrats can't muster pride in their own country, that goes way beyond partisanship. They’ve tied their sense of patriotism to the wrong things. They’ve made hating America part of its identity, and the voters they need most are noticing.

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/06/16/jd-vance-just-handed-jessica-tarlov-a-patriotism-lesson-she-wont-forget-n4954044?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Energy Commission Moves to Lower Prices for Americans

Energy Commission Moves to Lower Prices for Americans
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

American families have been paying higher energy prices in the wake of the war in Iran, but one government agency is looking to fast-track relief measures that will ultimately lead to lower prices. 

The relief comes from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which voted unanimously, 5-0, to streamline the bureaucracy that has been bottlenecking natural gas infrastructure for years and hamstringing common-sense energy projects with byzantine rules. Most Americans have never heard of FERC, but the commission has an outsized impact on your utility bills.

Natural gas projects, such as pipelines, have been repeatedly blocked for years by mountains of red tape, making even simple upgrades to existing infrastructure virtually impossible. The result is less natural gas supplied to the market, which means higher prices.

When natural gas is more expensive, customers not only pay more to heat their homes, but to cool them as well, because gas supplies more than 40% of electricity in America. With power needs already skyrocketing from growth in AI data centers, electric cars, and manufacturing facilities, supply isn’t keeping up with demand.

The problem largely stems from the antiquated rules and price thresholds in FERC’s blanket certificate program—the framework that determines which pipeline projects need full case-by-case federal review, and which can proceed through a streamlined process. The program’s ossified metrics mean virtually nothing gets the streamlined treatment.

As long as routine infrastructure—a compressor upgrade here, a mainline improvement there—is under a certain dollar threshold, it’s approved for the blanket certificate program without the need for a costly, time-consuming full certificate proceeding. But those dollar thresholds remain frozen near 2006 levels.

Meanwhile, by FERC’s own analysis, pipeline construction costs rose nearly 257 percent between 2006 and 2024, and have climbed further since. In other words, inflation alone quietly converted routine maintenance into “major projects” requiring the full bureaucratic treatment, with its delays and costs.

A compressor station upgrade that would have sailed through a streamlined review in 2006 now sits in a federal queue for months, not because it became more dangerous, polluting, or controversial, but because the prices of steel, labor, and concrete have gone up. That is regulation by accident, not intent—and consumers have been paying for it.

FERC, led by its chairman, Laura Swett, has proposed more than doubling the dollar thresholds to better reflect what these routine, uncontentious projects truly cost. It’d also eliminate cost limits entirely for expansions at existing compressor station sites, so long as the work stays within the utility’s fenceline.

Just adding horsepower to a pumping station that has already been reviewed, built, and operated safely for years should be straightforward. The proposal also extends the in-service deadline for blanket projects from one year to two, giving developers a realistic runway instead of an artificial cliff that keeps projects from ever breaking ground.

These changes matter because regulatory delays are a hidden tax paid by the American people, landing hardest on those least able to pay. Every month—or year—that a routine upgrade languishes in bureaucratic review is more time for demand to outpace supply and drive up prices.

Gas and electric bills alike have risen because—ironically—the world's largest producer of natural gas since 2011 has been hobbled by its own paperwork.

The damage goes beyond utilities, because energy impacts the cost of everything. Higher energy prices ripple through groceries, rent, and anything that's manufactured or transported. Permitting delay looks an awful lot like inflation.

Fortunately, returning to a streamlined approval process helps solve the problem by eliminating this hidden tax. Finalizing these reforms is an economic necessity, especially given rising energy demand in the years ahead.

This also delivers on President Trump's agenda to expedite permitting, as per the "Unleashing American Energy" executive order he signed on his first day back in office. The unanimous vote from a commission that's often divided on policy illustrates the overwhelming case for this commonsense reform.

FERC's decision is the opening salvo, not the last word, in this fight. The next step will be a formally proposed rule, and the public can comment for 60 days thereafter. Opponents should be heard, then outvoted, so that American families and businesses come before special interest groups. We can't afford artificially high energy bills anymore.

https://townhall.com/columnists/ej-antoni/2026/06/16/energy-commission-moves-to-lower-prices-for-americans-n2677800?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-ZzvYf7FkpJ&utm_term=&_nlid=ZzvYf7FkpJ&_nhids=nc40pCY4Hp4qls

Friday, June 19, 2026

‘No Kings’ Crowd Gets Wrecked by One Brutally Honest Media Column

‘No Kings’ Crowd Gets Wrecked by One Brutally Honest Media Column

AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

The part that I thoroughly enjoy about being a writer and a sometime radio host is that I get to explore some of the material that is currently bouncing around the world wide interwebs. On any given day, there's some weird stuff bouncing around those interwebs, and it never stops, which can be delightful and frustrating.

Occasionally, when I read a story outside of the Salem media websites, which of course, RedState is part of, I have to sit back and ponder the meaning of it.

Yet man, did I hit the jackpot here with this story.

This article from the Detroit News made me do a double-take, and as you can see, even the title had me intrigued.  If Trump is a king, he's terrible at it.

Damn. 

The lady who penned this piece goes right for the jugular.

As protesters gather for "No Kings" gatherings, rallies and even a First Amendment concert in New York City on President Donald Trump's 80th birthday, I can't help but snicker. If Trump is acting like a king, he's doing a lousy job of it.

Hot diggity dog.

I really can't agree with that more.

Democrats and others who have opposed his policies have had no issue challenging Trump and those policies in court. While I don't have total figures yet because Donald Trump still has a lot of his second term presidency to go, it seems every couple of days, he is having a lawsuit filed against something his administration is attempting to do.

Sure doesn't seem like he is a king to me — a man with overwhelming authority.

Mostly because he is not.

The author continues...

Contrary to the smears in my inbox, I'm not such a rabid MAGA supporter that I can't see Trump's flaws. He is thin-skinned and dodges accountability. He threatens and postures ‒ against media, allies and foes alike. He acts too quickly and sometimes crosses the line.

But enforcing the law aggressively is not tyranny. Trump sent troops to Washington, DC, to restore order. Democrats called it an overreach, but it seemed to help. He threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minnesota to quell riots against Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, then didn't follow through. Masked agents could stand to be more civil, but a nation that refuses to enforce its immigration laws quickly becomes a lawless one.

He's not a humble wallflower. He's a man of action who sometimes makes mistakes. But that's not the same as being a tyrannical dictator.

Exactly.

Donald Trump is someone who expects results much quicker than the federal government, or any government for that matter, is used to moving and accomplishing its goals. This is not a character flaw, but it is just a statement of the fact that there are many layers to go through with the largest government entity in the country, and every president, whoever they have been, has run into that. 

Trump learned during the first term what restrictions he was given, and it seems to me in the second term, he would rather do something and then, if the court overturns it, that's fine, but he would rather act first, ask for permission later. All presidents, in my opinion, at some point hit this stage.

Finally this...

By invoking the language of America's founding, the No Kings movement cheapens what that struggle actually meant. America was born from years of real tyranny, paid for in blood by people who had none of these freedoms.

Nailed it.

I have no idea how American history is being taught in the schools today. I sure hope it is at least as decent as it was when I was in the classroom back in the day.

What the founders went through to hand us the gift of a republic such as the United States of America was incredible, and something, as we come up on the 250th anniversary of the nation declaring its independence, that we should all take a moment and treasure. I really do hope that, as a nation, we do appreciate this more than we probably have in the past.

With that all being said, I sure hope that President Trump can keep up the hectic pace that he is known for and kick some you-know-what in his 80th year and America's 250th.

Also, he should keep mocking the No Kings folks because they have zero sense of humor about it, and that makes me laugh.

https://redstate.com/tladuke/2026/06/15/no-kings-crowd-gets-wrecked-by-one-brutally-honest-media-column-n2203367