Tuesday, February 24, 2026

How Net Zero Destroyed a Scottish City

How Net Zero Destroyed a Scottish City

AP Photo/Kin Cheung

Aberdeen is a beautiful city by all accounts. Nestled around a grand port in northeast Scotland, it's the third largest city in the country. It has a long and storied history, and until recently, it was a prosperous city. Part of the reason for that prosperity was the North Sea oil and gas business, which drove Aberdeen's economy up and brought good-paying jobs with it.

Now, thanks in large part to the United Kingdom's Energy Secretary Ed Miliband and his lunatic "Net Zero" schemes, Aberdeen is crashing and burning. Jobs are leaving, the oil and gas workers are headed for greener pastures, and real estate values are crashing. 

Net Zero has taken a prosperous city and ruined it in just a few short years. The UK Telegraph's Money writer, Benedict J Smith, has the numbers.

Just over a decade ago, Aberdeen was thriving.

It was the gateway to Britain’s North Sea oil and gas industry. Average weekly earnings were higher only in London and it consistently ranked among the top UK cities for business and jobs growth.

At £215,000, property prices were nearly double the Scottish average, having risen 165pc in just 10 years as the area boomed.

Following the scent of oil and gas, new arrivals appeared in their droves to fill highly paid positions. Between 2004 and 2015, the population jumped by nearly 20,000 and local businesses flourished.

That's the "before." This is the "after."

The picture is starkly different today. Tumbling oil prices, punitive taxes and the underwhelming advance of renewables have tipped the North Sea energy industry into a spiral of accelerated decline that is taking Aberdeen’s property market down with it.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband’s pledge to deliver a net zero transition for the area – in which jobs in oil and gas are replaced by ones in clean energy – has also fallen flat.

Rather than a renewables energy boom, some of the biggest companies in the region have scaled back investment or withdrawn entirely, seeking more profitable opportunities in other places as far-flung as the Persian Gulf.

Many of the most skilled workers have gone with them.

A major city, a modern city, a city thriving due to energy extraction, reversed course and is now crashing, in less than a decade. We may very well wonder if any American climate scolds are paying attention, but these are people who are very practiced at ignoring, shall we say, inconvenient truths.


Read More: $20 Trillion Down the Drain: Renewables Barely Dent Fossil Fuels

Climate Change: Trillions Spent, and Now We See Nothing Gained


Worst of all, the United Kingdom is doubling down on stupid.

A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesman said: “We are not willing to accept the status quo we inherited of the North Sea being in decline.

“We have set out a plan to build a prosperous and sustainable future for the North Sea, backed by record investment to grow clean energy industries.

“Our landmark clean energy jobs plan will also deliver the next generation of skilled jobs including over 40,000 new roles in Scotland by 2030.”

Yeah, let us know how that works out for you. 

Note the language put out in this outpouring of horse squeeze, because if you've been following the Net Zero/green energy stupidity for any time, it will seem very familiar. We can translate a few terms:

"We are not willing to accept the status quo we inherited of the North Sea being in decline," means, "The North Sea oil and gas industry, as well as Aberdeen, were doing just fine before we started sticking our green oar in."

"We have set out a plan to build a prosperous and sustainable future," means, "We will pour more money into 'green' energy boondoggles that can and will never replace the gas and oil resources that we are taking offline."

"...backed by record investments" means, "...pouring more tax dollars and private investments, if we can find any, down yet another series of Net Zero ratholes."

"...the next generation of skilled jobs" means "...we have no idea if or when anyone productive is going to remain in Aberdeen."

Aberdeen - a place I've always wanted to visit, but about which I harbor many doubts now - is failing. People are leaving. That's always one of the first danger signs, when the productive citizenry starts bailing for greener pastures (are you reading this, Governor Newsom?). Property values are dropping like a stone, and that may benefit a few remaining residents; it will harm many more. In the UK, like in the United States, real estate is often a significant portion of one's net worth, and when real estate crashes...

The United Kingdom, of which Scotland is a part, is beset with problems, some of which (immigration) may be beyond the point of no return. But if there's any way that the fall of the once-Great Britain could be accelerated, it would be by jacking up energy prices for lower-density, higher-cost, less reliable sources, when there is ample natural gas and oil for the taking in the North Sea. 

Energy is at the heart of everything in our modern, high-tech lifestyles. Ed Miliband seems determined to set the people of Britain back to the 1850s, energy-wise, and Aberdeen won't be the last major UK city to pay that price.

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2026/02/21/how-net-zero-destroyed-a-scottish-city-n2199409?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Gavin Newsom Takes an 'Imagine What You Could Have Done With the Money' Jab at Trump, KOs Himself Instead

Gavin Newsom Takes an 'Imagine What You Could Have Done With the Money' Jab at Trump, KOs Himself Instead

ImgFlip

As you know, yesterday the Supreme Court ruled against the Trump administration's tariffs in a 6-3 ruling, but according to Jonathan Turley and others, the White House will be able to find other ways to keep the tariffs in place:

The predictable spin on the Left is now "Trump's tariffs were struck down but have already cost American families (insert any made-up dollar amount here) and he owes them a refund!" The new narrative has dropped (until the NEXT new narrative drops over something else in about 24 hours):

Dances With Identity Theft, who voted to pass Obamacare which ended up the opposite of "Affordable," has a lot of nerve accusing somebody else of costing us money. 

Naturally California Gov. Gavin Newsom is getting in on that action, self-awareness be damned: 

Does Newsom really want to go there?

Dems like Newsom only know how to dole out taxpayer money. Actually getting something for Americans in return isn't even a distant concern. 

Shouldn't Newsom be spending his free time looking for his birth certificate instead of getting ratioed on social media?

https://twitchy.com/dougp/2026/02/21/gavin-newsom-takes-an-imagine-what-you-could-have-done-with-the-money-jab-at-trump-but-kos-himself-n2425257?utm_source=twdailyamvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

The Iconic Photographs That Haunt the Left — Because They Have No Answer

The Iconic Photographs That Haunt the Left — Because They Have No Answer

AP Photo/Luca Bruno

There’s a new photograph that puts fear in the heart of leftists, because the powerful emotion it projects cannot be argued with, it cannot be minimized, and it cannot be ignored. It epitomizes so many of the words patriots think of when they celebrate their country: Grit. Determination. An indomitable spirit.

The photograph is only days old, yet already it can take its place among the pantheon of great American moments. I’m talking about, of course, the picture of Olympic gold medalist Jack Hughes, who scored the overtime goal that brought the USA the hockey gold medal in the 2026 Milan Cortina Olympics.

This was after he lost two front teeth from a stick to the mouth, mind you. Timeless:

Your kids and your grandkids will see that photo years from now and think, now that was a great American achievement. Of course, it brings up memories of another classic, goalie Jim Craig draping the flag over his shoulders after the 1980 “Miracle on Ice.”

More recently, many think this photo — although taken after a horrific event in which 50-year-old firefighter Corey Comperatore was tragically killed — vaulted Donald Trump into the White House. Why? Because it showed courage, love of country, and an unconquerable will:

It reminded many people of another classic American photo:

Their courage drives our commitment to defend this nation with the same grit, sacrifice and unbreakable resolve they showed on that mountain.


UNFORGETTABLE: WON'T BACK DOWN: Injured Trump Pumps Fist As Blood Streams Down Face

Photographer Explains Incredible Moment He Snapped Pic of Bullet Nearing Trump's Head


Of course, this one, taken in the days following the end of WWII, remains timeless:

Why would Democrats detest these legendary photos? Because they undermine their “America sucks” narrative. Degenerates like former funnyladies Ellen DeGeneres and Rosie O’Donnell took off to other countries after Trump's presidential victory — only to come crawling back when they found out the USA is pretty damn awesome after all. 

Contrast Jack Hugh’s ebullient statements about the country he loves with the reaction from our USA-hating media. As our Brad Slager reported, many leftists live just to tell you how awful our country is: 

The HuffPost is not wrong: those who feel uncomfortable celebrating the United States are not alone: they’re surrounded by loser ingrates like themselves. Being born American or obtaining valid citizenship is like winning the lottery of life, yet these people constantly whine and moan that it’s not perfect.

Of course it’s not perfect, nothing is.

In the end, anyone can take a picture, but photography is an art. These photos, and others like them, will remain part of our history, and the leftists are powerless to combat their narrative. They show a love of country, a willingness to fight for it, a pride for what we as a people have created.

Suddenly, class warfare, extreme gender ideology, democratic socialism, and open borders seem small in comparison.

They wish they could make these timeless shots disappear, but a great photograph is forever.

In closing, let’s not forget that a painting can be pretty powerful in its own right:

Ponder that, Dems.

https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2026/02/24/the-iconic-photographs-that-haunt-the-left-because-they-have-no-answer-n2199503?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Jackalope Wind Project Hops onto Ash Heap of Green Energy History

Jackalope Wind Project Hops onto Ash Heap of Green Energy History

As the windfarm dreams burn down to cinders, it’s worth remembering that from honest reckoning with failure, sound energy policy can actually rise from the ashes.

As I am writing this on Ash Wednesday, I decided to take a look at the now mountainous pile of windfarm projects that have been tossed onto the ash heap of Green Energy history…thanks to President Donald Trump and his insistence that American energy sources be dependable, efficient, and as inexpensive as reasonably possible.

Last week, I noted that Now Wyoming’s top land officials moved to rescind the state wind leases underpinning the Pronghorn H2 and Sidewinder projects, effectively putting both projects on a path toward cancellation. It turns out that these projects were being constructed to support another untested and untried technology, and were unpopular with local residents.

Now, an amusingly named Jackalope Wind project in that state has hopped onto the Green Energy ash heap.

NextEra Energy (NEE) has canceled its 600 MW Jackalope wind farm project in Wyoming, The New York Times reported Wednesday, in the latest casualty of President Trump’s efforts to slow or stop federal approvals for wind and solar projects.

A key environmental review of Jackalope Wind by the Interior Department was stalled for months, and the project is now effectively dead, the report said.

The project, which was expected to be operational by summer 2027, signed an agreement in late 2024 with Idaho Power (IDA) to sell energy produced by the farm over 35 years.

In September, the Idaho utility canceled its contracts with Jackalope Wind, citing “uncertainties related to the federal permitting process,” and has since accelerated plans to install nine engines that burn natural gas.

Given that the jackalope is a mythical creature that may be the result of jack rabbits being infected with a nasty virus that results in facial tentacles, perhaps the name is fitting. Green energy scams and pseudoscience have infected the American economy, and funding tentacles sprouted that are only now being treated.

Next, after a cold snap so frost Lake Erie froze, New York State is clearly rethinking its “NetZero” goals.

New York State on Friday cited “federal disruptions” and “market uncertainty” in canceling its latest and largest request for new offshore wind energy, months after several bidders had already pulled out of the process.

Nixing the solicitation puts an end, for now, to a plan that foresaw potentially thousands of new wind power arrays in deep waters off New York and New Jersey.

In a statement Friday, the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, which administers the state’s clean energy programs, said it “would not be prudent” to move ahead with its prior request for proposals for upward of 4,000 megawatts for offshore wind “given the current level of uncertainty” in the nascent, and troubled, U.S. offshore wind market. The bidding closed without an award “at this time,” NYSERDA said.

NYSERDA in its statement said “federal actions disrupted the market and instilled significant uncertainty into offshore wind project development.”

As Beege Welborn of Hot Air notes, Trump is being used as an excuse to begin walking away from wind-driven eco-insanity.

No doubt this ongoing industry turmoil has been playing into NY’s looking for a graceful exit, and Trump is that guy who gives them one.

But I’d bet there’s even more to it.

People aren’t falling for the renewables-in-the-tailpipe anymore. They’re simply no longer willing to be gullible – they can’t afford it. And especially worrying to Mid-Atlantic and New England governors, their core voting demographic is feeling ‘misled.’

And The New York Times is all too happy to push the Trump-blaming narrative.

While Mr. Trump’s attacks on offshore wind have been highly visible, his administration has also been hobbling solar and wind energy projects on land by halting or delaying federal approvals that were once routine.

More than 60 large wind and solar farms under development on federal lands, such as Jackalope Wind, are being stymied. But the administration is also holding up hundreds of wind and solar projects on private land that require federal consultations. Many projects are facing potentially fatal delays, according to interviews with more than a dozen energy companies, industry groups and analysts.

The extra layer of scrutiny for wind and solar contrasts with actions by the Trump administration to make it easier and cheaper for companies to produce oil, coal, gas and nuclear power.

I will simply point out, as I often do, that nuclear power is the most efficient “Net Zero” option on the table. If the NYT were serious about carbon concerns, it would be happy with the Trump administration’s push for nuclear.

Meanwhile, enjoy the climate cultist tears and the cheap fuel prices. That is, unless you live in California.

From the ashes of “NetZero” fantasies, a clearer path is finally emerging that is built on sound engineering and science, not climate-hysteria-pushing slogans.

On this Ash Wednesday, as the windfarm dreams burn down to cinders, it’s worth remembering that from honest reckoning with failure, sound energy policy can actually rise from the ashes.

https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/02/jackalope-wind-project-hops-onto-ash-heap-of-green-energy-history/