Tuesday, October 20, 2026

The Burqafication of France Is Nearly Complete

The Burqafication of France Is Nearly Complete

The Morning Briefing: The Burqafication of France Is Nearly Complete
AP Photo/Laurent Cipriani

Top O' the Briefing

Happy Monday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Zwibythugh was thrilled at the success of his rage-clogging interactives at the Friends of Bea Arthur Movement Center. 

Regulars here are familiar with my penchant for bashing the Eurotrash "leaders" who are continual embarrassments to all freedom-loving people in the West. I would prefer not to have a reason to, but they make it easier all of the time. 

At the beginning of this month, I led a Briefing with a headline that said the UK has outlived its usefulness to the free world. UK leaders' Islamofetishism is the reason for that, of course, and that's also the reason for the cratering world stage relevance of Germany, Spain, and France. 

The barrage of bad news from the UK will no doubt continue without pause, but France has reentered the conversation and is saying, "Hold my bière." 

This is from Rick:

In France, more than half a million people poured into the streets as mobs of radical left rioters, students, labor unions, and antifa thugs rampaged through historic districts, burning government buildings and bringing the country to a "point of no return," according to Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu.

There's a leftist narrative being sold hard that the rioting has roots in angst about the economy and education. Like 99.999999% of all leftist narratives, it avoids huge chunks of the truth. Here's some follow-up from Catherine:

The riots in France are not about the cost of living or education. There is a reason so many of those rioting are immigrants or first-generation (especially Muslims), and why so many of them carry Communist or Palestinian flags. We are watching the neo-Nazi sharia takeover of France in real time. That is why the Marseille rioters specifically targeted Jewish businesses.

Quelle surprise!

As Catherine goes on to point out, this was done on the Sabbath. Some people may say that this was purely a coincidence. Those people would most likely be employed by leftist media organizations. It's probably safe to say that most of us who hang out here aren't big believers in coincidence. 

Trouble sure does seem to follow large concentrations of Muslim migrants, doesn't it? Or — just spitballing here — they bring the trouble with them and simply don't unpack it all right away. Kind of a "sleeper" approach to chaos, if you will. 

I know, I know, Islamophobia and stuff. 

Like its English friends, France doesn't understand that it is mostly a vestigial afterthought on the world stage in the 21st century. Western civilization doesn't need attitude-filled cafés for its survival. 

Perhaps the diminished global stature made France, England, and Germany so starved for attention that their leaders couldn't say no to the Muslim migrant invasion even though the risks were obvious. 

Or should have been obvious.

Western leftists lie so often that I'm convinced they forget that they're lying and begin to believe the prevarication that they are peddling. The post-9/11 spin about Islam being a religion of peace and most Muslims being wide-eyed innocents has become truth for woke leftists. All that talk about wanting to destroy the West and kill infidels is just the ranting of a few bad seeds, according to them. 

They create an alternative universe that is filled with the comfort of blissful ignorance. 

The European countries that are the biggest cesspools now are also the ones that are most beloved by American leftists. French President Emmanuel Macron is a particular darling of Democrats. What did Manny Mac do as the powder keg in his country was just about to blow? He went to a Celine Dion concert, which my RedState colleague Nick Arama wrote about here. Macron is a thoroughly unserious panderer overseeing a country that is in dire need of having an adult in charge. 

The Francophile tourists who can't get enough of the Eiffel Tower might want to visit sooner rather than later. The Parisian dress code for women may be undergoing some changes in the very near future. 

Gay visitors should probably avoid the tower altogether.

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/10/19/the-morning-briefing-the-burqafication-of-france-is-nearly-complete-n4958430/?utm_campaign=nl_pm&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjmediambvip

Radical Leftists Put Out Hit List on Judges

Radical Leftists Put Out Hit List on Judges

Radical Leftists Put Out Hit List on Judges
PJ Media

Democrats are unambiguous about what they would do if they were to return to power. They want to create new states, change the Constitution to get rid of the Electoral College, and they want to pack the Supreme Court with leftists so they can force their will on the American people the way Bill Clinton used to force his will on unsuspecting women. For the people who screech “THIS IS WHAT DEMOCRACY LOOKS LIKE!” their plans are decidedly undemocratic.

But leftists are not people known for changing course – in the 20th century after 50 million people had died as a direct result of their policies they didn’t change course or even take their foot off the gas. Individuals are disposable to leftists, and you’re either on the team or under the tires.

The radical group “Justice Democrats” is one of many groups carrying on that “you’re either with us or you’re our enemy” attitude. They’re like modern Brownshirts – the enforcement wing of the extremists. They’ve been surpassed in attention by the Democratic Socialists of America, but they are essentially the same evil – think of them both as different forms of cancer: they’re similar, but different, and the end result of either is the same.

Justice Democrats gave the world Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14); the DSA gave it Zohran Mamdani: Different forms of cancer.

Now the Justice Democrats are pushing their members to vote for Democrats on the issue of federal judges but they’re doing it to a group with a lot of mentally unstable, violent people who could easily snap and kill someone.

It’s not unheard of; leftists have been murdering, or trying to murder, their political opponents since the “Progressive Movement” started at the beginning of the last century. Find a political assassination and you’d make money if you’d bet it was a leftist.

The group put out a fundraising email under the subject line, “These 10 judges are building an Oligarchy.” There’s nothing people funded by millionaires and billionaires hate more than rich people, or something.

So, who are these judges? You’d think it would be the Supreme Court Justices that displease them, as they are well known and easy to use to mobilize stupid people again. But you’d be wrong. These are lower court judges, people the public does not know (or at least didn’t), who don’t have security, who have acted in a way that displeased the radical left and, mostly, their moneyed masters.

“Ten federal judges. One result: more power for corporations and the ultra-wealthy, less for everyone else,” they wrote. “Together, they’re enabling the slide toward Oligarchy.” It’s a call to action that serves as a call to arms for the unstable.

Then they list the judges along with their “offences.” I’m going to list them here because A) You’re sane people, B) It’s a VIP column, so no unhinged leftists will see it, and C) I want it out there in case one of them acts on it.

Here’s what they sent to members:

  • #1: Judge Andrew Oldham called our entire system of administrative law “constitutionally suspect,” a view that threatens the EPA, OSHA, and the CFPB.
  • #2: Chief Judge Reed O’Connor ruled the entire Affordable Care Act unconstitutional, a theory so extreme the Supreme Court reversed it 7-2.
  • #3: Chief Judge Amos Mazzant struck down overtime pay for 4 million workers and blocked a law targeting anonymous shell companies.
  • #4: Judge James C. Ho reported 26 reimbursed trips, including a Cancun junket paid for by the right-wing group behind overturning Roe v. Wade.
  • #5: Judge Don R. Willett wants to revive the legal doctrine courts once used to strike down minimum wage and child labor laws.
  • #6: Judge Edith H. Jones argued for a theory that would have destroyed the CFPB, the agency that has returned over $21 billion to consumers.
  • #7: Judge Victor Marrero approved the T-Mobile/Sprint merger despite objections from 14 state attorneys general. The combined company shed roughly 14,000 jobs.
  • #8: Judge J. Campbell Barker helped kill a rule that would have raised franchise and contract workers’ pay by $1.06 billion a year.
  • #9: Judge Ada E. Brown nullified the FTC’s non-compete ban, costing 30 million workers more than $400 billion in wages.
  • #10: Judge Sean D. Jordan wiped out overtime protections for another 4 million workers, then killed a rule keeping medical debt off credit reports.
  • Workers, consumers, and patients lose. Corporations and billionaires get richer. Several of these judges have their lifestyles bankrolled by the same conservative legal network shaping the bench and we’re calling it what it is: corruption. Demand Justice PAC is fighting back: naming names, exposing the money and influence behind these rulings, and fighting to restore independence to our courts.


You’ve likely never heard of any of these judges, or at least most of them, but now every unstable “NO KINGS” radical has, and there’s a pretty good chance people living on the edge of snapping could be looking at a straw that breaks the camel’s back. Is that what Democrats are hoping for? Probably not. But they know it’s a possibility, and they don’t care. Individuals, as I said, are disposable, especially ones who disagree with them.

These are dangerous people.

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2026/10/19/radical-leftists-put-out-hit-list-on-judges-n2684878?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-z92ScJsGYf&utm_term=&_nlid=z92ScJsGYf&_nhids=nc0oRsD9ca7Zls

Who the Left Attracts, Part 2

Who the Left Attracts, Part 2

Who the Left Attracts, Part 2
AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File

Watching a leftist rally today is frightening. It’s frightening not because of any physical threat (though that threat does exist) but because it so depressingly illustrates an unbridgeable divide between leftists and the rest of society. The screaming and the shrieking. The mob violence. The senseless herd mentality. The rigid Manicheanism. The mental breakdowns. The absolute inability to STFU and listen.

It’s not even about politics anymore. It’s not about which economic system, capitalism or socialism, better serves people. It’s not about equality or liberty, it’s not about negative rights versus positive rights, it’s not about the role of government in our lives.

It’s not about racism or patriarchy, it’s not about saving the planet, it’s not about the marginalized and underprivileged, it’s not about the role of ideology in public education, it’s not about the definition of free speech, and it’s not about the duties of a nation-state toward its own people.

It’s not even about the individualism versus collectivism. The political divide in modern America can now be split into two groups based almost solely on mental stability and the motivations driving their members.

On one side are the vast majority of conservatives, as well as independents, moderate Democrats, and even very liberal Democrats. I would throw Bill Maher and Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) into this last category. We probably disagree with them on most political issues, but my exercise in categorization transcends politics to something deeper. Both Maher and Fetterman, I would argue, envision an America where free speech and open discourse are encouraged, not abolished.

The other side seems to consist largely of three distinct but overlapping groups:

The Hedonists

It would also be fair to call them nihilists or militant secularists. To them, the immediate gratification in the Here and Now is paramount. The only purpose they understand is the vulgar pleasures of the senses. The only meaning they derive is that if society is not satisfying their every whim, it must be someone else’s fault.

The Totalitarians

These are the “ringleader” and “organizer” types who mistake a worthless college degree for wisdom. It is arrogance, not crass sensuality, that drives them. Their egos, not their tactility, require massage. They worship their own reason as a god and, much like a god, will not suffer dissent, challenge, or heresy.

The Mentally Ill

As I took pains to point out yesterday, I don’t use the term “mentally ill” as a jest or insult. Mental illness is a serious, underappreciated factor in the lives of millions of innocent Americans. It is also exploited and misused. A child showing signs of gender discomfort from the age of four or five onward might be suffering from gender dysphoria (for which there are treatments that don’t involve enabling). A teenage male who sucks at sports and suddenly “identifies” as a female so he can steal their scholarships and trophies most definitely does not suffer from gender dysphoria. But I argued in my article yesterday that the left exploits other personality traits, indicative of selfish and emotionally immature people, and uses them for its own ends.

My article today focuses on the hedonists. One does not need to be “stupid” to be a hedonist. On the contrary, I’ve no doubt that most members of the Lindsay Clancy Fan Club marching for her “peace” outside the Massachusetts courthouse boast credentials, degrees, and decent salaries. What they do need is both the ability and the willingness to lie to themselves, to engage in the most absurd cognitive dissonance possible, to hold the positions that they do.

Three children were murdered in cold blood at the hands of their own mother? Why, of course the real victims are the legions of marginalized, disenfranchised, underprivileged middle- to upper-class white liberal women living in the safest, richest neighborhoods that civilization has ever built. I doubt even one of the marchers could say the three kids’ names.

Why? Because to the hedonist, children don’t represent happiness, family, or purpose. Children represent an impediment. Children represent an abrupt halt to a 24/7 ME ME ME lifestyle. Children represent burden, unsought sacrifice, and a 1950s caricature of enslaving motherhood.

Make no mistake: the hedonists don’t justify the Clancy murders on the grounds that she was mentally unstable at the time. They’d be fine with the murders regardless of her mental state. To the hedonist, the murder of these children represented a twisted liberation for the murderer to live whatever life she wanted.

This is why the hedonists bristle at the Clintonian assertion that abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare.” Instead, they encourage women to “shout their abortions.”

Lest anyone think I’m only picking on the ladies, I’ll remind them that Dan Turner, the father of convicted rapist Brock Turner, penned a letter to the judge requesting leniency for his son for raping an unconscious woman. In the letter, Dan argued that his son shouldn’t be given a lengthy prison sentence all because of “20 minutes of action.”

That’s how Dan Turner described his son raping a woman. Twenty minutes of action.

That is hedonism. Brock wanted to feel good, so he destroyed the life of an innocent woman to do so. And his dad defended his actions.

And as for this new controversy at Cornell, in which a woman is alleging that seven men gang-raped her? And the men are countering, saying it was consensual? And one of the men is countering that he was unconscious at the time of the sexual encounter, making him the rape victim?

As far as I’m concerned, even if all eight people involved gave consent to everything, they’re animals. All eight of them stand at the top 1% of the top 1% of privileged upbringing in all of human history. They literally have the power in their hands to change the world for the better. And instead, they spend their time snorting ketamine, drinking to unconsciousness, and having orgies. Caesar Caligula would be ashamed.

This isn’t civilization. This is hedonism.

This is why the modern gay pride parade is such a raunch fest. I’m old enough to remember when the messaging was more modest, and ran something along the lines of: We are gay, but we don’t want you to think of us as outcasts. We are plumbers, accountants, doctors, soldiers, sons, and daughters just like you. We don’t want to be defined by our sexuality. Nowadays, the message is that they’re defining themselves only by their sexuality, and they love nothing more than to shove your nose in it. Which makes the rest of us wonder whether their newfound hedonistic outlook wasn’t there all along.

     Related: Who the Left Attracts, Part 1

Hedonism is behind any and all drug legalization efforts, especially the most recent (and successful) drive to normalize cannabis. It had nothing to do with back pain. It never did. It has everything to do with the absurd notion that cannabis is necessary to offset the stress in users' lives in 21st-century America, lives that are somehow so much more unbearable than the easygoing, carefree lives of their ancestors who sailed across the ocean in a wooden boat and built this country with their bare hands.

Ditto for efforts to legalize prostitution. It was never about dignifying “sex workers.” It was about institutionalizing cheap, consequence-free sex. It was about pushing the idea that we should view each other as objects to use, not as people to love. OnlyFans. Tinder. They all dehumanize us.

Hedonism is behind demands for “free” health care. Hedonism is behind demands for “free” college. All the squawking about “compassion” and “social justice” is just a smokescreen. Hedonism claims it is your responsibility to make me comfortable.

Hedonism claims that anything impeding the immediate gratification of your most vulgar sensual desires is evidence of “fascism” or “oppression” or whatever new term is tossed around with zero comprehension of what it actually means.

College debt? Send that bill to someone else. Study for the exam? Hell no, let’s get inebriated and roll around in a pile like pigs in a sty. Feeling frisky tonight? You have the “right” to sex, even if you take it by force. Noisy kids making you pine for those long-lost nights of box wine and charcuterie parties? Strangle them in your basement and people will call you a hero.

Hedonism is the release of our worst impulses, made possible when people forsake God. And their “freedom” makes them so much easier to control.

https://pjmedia.com/aj-christopher/2026/10/17/who-the-left-attracts-part-2-n4958431?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Monday, October 19, 2026

AOC Is Wrong: Elected Officials Should Never Ask Businesses to Fight Immigration Battles for Them

AOC Is Wrong: Elected Officials Should Never Ask Businesses to Fight Immigration Battles for Them

AOC Is Wrong: Elected Officials Should Never Ask Businesses to Fight Immigration Battles for Them
AP Photo/Jose Juarez

After last week’s shooting of Oscar Belgal in Marble Hill, Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) demanded that Target stop “offering” its Bronx properties as staging sites for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The company, however, says it has no cooperative agreements with ICE or any other immigration-enforcement agency. Obviously, reports that agents simply used a parking lot, as is their legal right, do not establish that Target invited, authorized, or even knew about the agents doing so.

On October 16, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and more than 100 other officials followed AOC’s lead in a letter urging private parking lot and garage owners across the city to deny ICE the use of their facilities for enforcement staging. Their letter asks owners to inform ICE agents that they are not authorized to use their properties, which is potentially an illegal and obstructive request to law enforcement. 

The letter goes further in demanding compliance and asks the recipients to demonstrate that they will actively keep agents away from their premises, while acknowledging that ICE’s use of parking facilities may involve a formal agreement, an informal arrangement, or “no arrangement at all.” In other words, a business need not have invited federal agents or agreed to support their work to become responsible, under this new political standard, for stopping ICE agents from using their property.

While the original accusation against Target demanded evidence of cooperation (for which there is none), the expanded campaign demands action regardless of whether cooperation occurred. That is a significant shift, and before this trend spreads beyond New York, Democrat lawmakers need to wake up and realize whose shoulders this new burden of theirs is falling upon.

A garage operator has customers to serve, and a retailer has employees to supervise, deliveries to receive, and a business to run. Now, political leaders want these employers and young employees to manage the fallout from a confrontation between federal and local immigration policies.

The consequences will not be an exchange of letters between elected officials and corporate executives. The consequences are someone working at a garage or store being forced to jump into action when agents arrive, explain company policy, and summon help if a dispute develops. 

If ICE agents refuse to comply with being asked to vacate private spaces intended for public use, such as parking lots, when doing so falls within the established legal rights of law enforcement, and the business owner or employee refuses to budge on asking them to leave, then it’s easy to see how some of these interactions masterminded by Democrat lawmakers will not go well. 

For a young employee learning to manage a shift, this could become a responsibility with untold consequences. Imagine a 17-year-old kid working in the parking garage at Bronx Terminal Market, going and finding shopping carts and returning them to their proper location. Now imagine that kid having to go up to idling cars with people in them, since ICE agents sometimes operate in plain clothes and unmarked cars, knock on windows, ask if they are ICE agents, and then demand that they leave if they say yes. Why would Democrat lawmakers want to put that burden on that young person?

Elected officials are supposed to spend their time alleviating burdens on the public and making things easier and simpler, not issuing demands for citizens to obstruct law enforcement. Immigration policy is the responsibility of government. Elected officials have the authority, staff, and public mandate to challenge enforcement practices, seek records, and pursue changes in law. They should use those tools and accept responsibility for the results rather than deputizing the public to be immigration and customs enforcement watchdogs. 

While the Marble Hill shooting warrants investigation, as do all arrests during which a law enforcement officer discharges a firearm, lawmakers who have chosen to drag private companies and their employees into this political fight have gone too far. 

AOC and her colleagues have moved from inaccurately accusing one company of cooperation to asking businesses across New York to prevent staging activity for federal officers. Conservative lawmakers in Washington must call this behavior for what it is: asinine, counterproductive, and dangerous.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kenblackwell/2026/10/17/aoc-is-wrong-elected-officials-should-never-ask-businesses-to-fight-immigration-battles-for-them-n2684843?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-4skS7qAyEG&utm_term=&_nlid=4skS7qAyEG&_nhids=ncyGZHlai1kbls

The Perils of Believing the Pollsters Every October

The Perils of Believing the Pollsters Every October

The Perils of Believing the Pollsters Every October
AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura

Everyone absorbing the elitist media spin on the midterm elections cannot avoid the swirling symphony of doom for the Republicans. Conventional wisdom suggests a good night for Democrats, and that's before you look at the president's dreadful approval rating. Polls can be tricky: one can disapprove of Trump and still vote the Republican party line.

All this doom might be accurate — or it might turn out like 2016. Hillary Clinton had a 98 percent chance of winning, they said. Then-"CBS Evening News" anchor Scott Pelley suppressed his delight as he claimed, "Time is running out for Donald Trump ... No candidate down this far, this late, has ever recovered." Over on ABC, Jonathan Karl echoed: "Donald Trump is down 17 points among women. You do not get elected ... if you are down 17 points among women."

When all of the media's polls turned out to look like Fake News, Democrats immediately suspected the election had been stolen and then spent four years denying reality.

So it was amazing when the front page of The New York Times on Oct. 15 boasted new research on the president's second-term statements about his loss in 2020: "Trump's Relentless Campaign To Cast Doubt On Elections With Lies and Bold Claims." They don't have the slightest bit of shame about anyone turning that around on them. They won a Pulitzer Prize for their "relentless campaign to cast doubt" on Trump's 2016 election, and they weren't going to send it back in disgrace.

In 2024, the networks spent the last few weeks of the campaign wildly speculating about how Donald Trump wouldn't accept his impending defeat and it would be complete chaos. They eagerly shared the alleged data point from the Des Moines Register that Kamala Harris was up 3 points in Iowa — and then she lost by 13.

When Trump was victorious again, PBS pundit Jonathan Capehart concluded on Election Night: "I can't help but wonder if the American people have given up on democracy." This wasn't a one-time emotional reaction. Days before Trump's second inauguration, Capehart repeated himself on PBS: "with these results, the American people just sort of gave up on democracy, or wanting to, hey, let's try this authoritarianism ... Let's give that a shot."

Conservatives and Republicans must always contend with the supercilious supposition that "democracy" is only genuinely in place when they lose. The Left believes the "right side of history" must inevitably prevail. The Capehart types all borrow from Martin Luther King that "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice." Democracy "dies in darkness" if they don't get their way.

But what we suddenly face in these midterm elections is a "Democrat" Party in thrall to the "Democratic" Socialists of America, whose platform includes repealing the Supreme Court, the Senate and the presidency. If our media elites were champions of democracy instead of Democrat partisans and enablers, they would strongly oppose that extremist tendency. They would defend norms and institutions. Instead, they want to accommodate the DSA so they can gain a majority.

The natural momentum here would lead to Democrats winning back the House, and possibly the Senate. What happens when the DSA faction in those majorities starts undermining norms and institutions? Democrat candidates like Sherrod Brown are already promising to refuse to confirm any new Trump judicial nominations. Sadly but surely, we can guess that journalists will continue to promote and enable whatever tactic gives their side the most power to bend that "arc of justice."

https://townhall.com/columnists/timgraham/2026/10/16/the-perils-of-believing-the-pollsters-every-october-n2684774?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-UseBkJurNT&utm_term=&_nlid=UseBkJurNT&_nhids=ncyGZHlai1kbls