Monday, April 13, 2026

What Do Artemis II and Socialism Have in Common?

What Do Artemis II and Socialism Have in Common?

Watching the enthusiasm, especially among people younger than me, over the Artemis II mission around the moon, recalled that the last men to land on the lunar surface did so in December 1972. Two generations have been born since then, and for them, the excitement of a powerful rocket and the danger involved in such a mission is something new.

This is about to come true with socialism as it is being imposed in New York City by Mayor Zohran Mamdani, its longtime American "prophet," Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT), and others in and out of Congress. Many younger people who voted for Mamdani have no idea what socialism looks and feels like. They weren't around for the Cold War. They never had to live under socialism. It sounds so "fair," the distribution of wealth to others who have not earned it; wealth that was created by capitalism, which in their schools and among their Instagram-using friends they have come to hate, but don't know why. Yet, for now, they still benefit from capitalism.

Most have never served in our all-volunteer military and, in too many instances, have been pampered by parents who allow them to live at home when their degrees in African American or women's studies don't qualify them for real jobs in an increasingly technological economy.

Younger people (and older ones for different reasons) are thrilled by the Artemis II adventure. They seem unaware of what that earlier space program did to bring Americans together in ways we haven't seen since the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001. Again, another generation has been born since that awful day.

As a young reporter in Houston, I covered the space program in the late '60s and early '70s. It was the product of President John F. Kennedy's vision to send men to the moon by the end of the 1960s. Those astronauts really were "The Right Stuff," as Tom Wolfe labeled them in a book that became a hit movie. Spending time in Mission Control, sitting in a simulator, meeting some of the astronauts, including Alan Shepard, John Glenn, Deke Slayton, and Jack Lousma, and watching some of them fly to the moon was thrilling. Though the Vietnam War raged and demonstrators took to the streets to protest, the U.S. space program was a unifying force.

When Apollo 13 got in trouble ("Houston, we've had a problem," said Jim Lovell), the three TV networks that had become blase after previous moon landings at first didn't cover it. Not until an oxygen tank exploded in the service module, disabling its electrical and life-support system. Suddenly, the world was again watching the drama as it did when Apollo 11 first landed men on the moon. Even Congress issued a statement calling for prayer for the safe return of the astronauts. That might not happen today.

We're again hearing arguments against spending so much money on space missions when the economy is struggling, but we address both. We have before.

It is said that capitalism raises all boats. Socialism sinks them or at least prevents them from sailing much at all. People – especially younger people – who have never lived under socialism should study it and listen to or read about people who have.

As for the renewed space program, exploration is in our blood, and with even newer technologies soon to come, we will be able to go even further than anyone has before. Younger people: put down your phones and learn more about space and socialism.

https://townhall.com/columnists/calthomas/2026/04/09/what-do-artemis-ii-and-socialism-have-in-common-n2674114?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-sAaxUzRcWx&utm_term=&_nlid=sAaxUzRcWx&_nhids=ncxGeHz1sXokls

What Stupid Ayatollahs

What Stupid Ayatollahs

What Stupid Ayatollahs
AP Photo/Ali Raza

Theres a classic scene in “Hoosiers” where the interim coach offers to help Gene Hackmans character. Hackman declines, and the coach delivers one of the most memorable lines in sports movie history:

Theres two kinds of stupid in this world. One is the kind where a man gets naked and barks at the moon in the middle of the woods. The other is the man who does the same thing in my living room.”

Well, the ayatollahs in Iran have officially moved from the woods to the living room.

And the problem isthey dont seem to know it.

Because if you look at whats happening right now in the negotiations involving the United States, Iran, and intermediaries like Pakistan, you dont see strategy.

You see a regime that has completely misread the moment.

For decades, Irans leadership has operated under a very specific assumption: that every American president ultimately behaves the same way. Tough talk, red lines, then retreat. Pressure, followed by accommodation. Escalation, followed by relief.

Theyve watched it play out since Carter. They saw it under Obamawhere red lines vanished and pallets of cash showed up on runways. Theyve learned to stall, posture, and wait out the storm. And so they assumed this would be no different.

That was their first mistake. Because this president is not that guy.

Recent reporting makes clear that negotiationssome of them routed through regional players like Pakistanare happening alongside sustained pressure that is not easing. The strategy is not complicated: compress the regimes options until it has to choose between survival and stubbornness.

Thats not theoretical diplomacy. Thats leverage. And leverage changes behaviorif the people across the table are smart enough to recognize it.

Thats where the ayatollahs are failing.

Because even as their position weakensmilitarily, economically, diplomaticallythey continue to act as though they are dictating terms.

They stall. They reject. They posture. They delay. And in doing so, they reveal something that should alarm anyone watching closely: They dont understand the room theyre in.

This is not the familiar negotiating table where time is their ally and American resolve is temporary. This is a narrowing corridor. Every delay costs them more. Every rejection isolates them further. Every miscalculation reduces their already shrinking leverage. And yet, they continue as if the old playbook still applies.

Thats not strategy. Thats the second kind of stupid.

Now, to be fair, their confusion is not entirely self-generated. Theyve been trainedby years of inconsistent Western responsesto believe that endurance equals victory. That if they simply outlast the moment, the pressure will dissipate and the world will move on. But that assumption no longer holds.

And what makes this even more remarkable is that some of the presidents critics here at home still havent figured that out either.

Weve watched the same pattern play out again and again. Underestimate him, dismiss him, assume hell follow the same tired scriptand then watch as he bulldozes straight through it.

The ayatollahs are making the exact same mistake. They are treating this like a normal negotiation. It isnt.

Internally, their regime is under strain. Years of economic mismanagement, corruption, and repression have eroded public trust. Waves of protestsespecially among younger Iranianshave made it clear that the population is not nearly as compliant as the regime pretends.

Externally, their influence is weakening. The networks they built through proxies and intimidation are under pressure. Regional actors are recalculating. Isolation is no longer a distant threatits an active reality.

And now, in the middle of all of that, they are being presented with a choice. Adapt or absorb the consequences.

Instead, theyre stalling.

It would be almost comical if it werent so consequential. Because history is filled with regimes that behave this way in their final chapters. They misread strength as bluff. They interpret restraint as weakness. They assume the future will look like the past.

And then, suddenly, it doesnt.

Thats the moment theyre in right now.

They walked into a living room thinking they were still alone in the woods. They assumed the same old tricks would work. They believed the same old patterns would hold. But the room has changed. The stakes have changed. And the man across from them is not playing by the old rules.

So, yes, there are two kinds of stupid in this world.

And right now, the ayatollahs are demonstratingon the global stage, in real timewhich kind theyve chosen to be.

The only question left is whether they realize it before the consequences finish teaching the lesson for them.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2026/04/12/what-stupid-ayatollahs-n2674309?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-KqZ2dQjG4y&utm_term=&_nlid=KqZ2dQjG4y&_nhids=ncn4ZIjrfNLGls

Trump Admin. Scores a Big Win at 4th Circuit Regarding DOGE

Trump Admin. Scores a Big Win at 4th Circuit Regarding DOGE

The Trump administration scored a significant appellate win on Friday with a 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling regarding DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) access to Social Security Administration (SSA) records. 

The appellate court, sitting en banc, vacated the preliminary injunction issued by Maryland District Court Judge Ellen Hollander in April of 2025 — a decision that blocked DOGE personnel from accessing sensitive SSA data. The Trump administration appealed that (district court) decision, even filing an application for stay with the Supreme Court when the 4th Circuit denied its motion for a stay pending appeal. That application was granted by the Supreme Court in June, and the 4th Circuit heard oral argument on the matter in September. 


RELATED: Trump Administration Files Emergency Appeal With SCOTUS After Fed Judge Blocks DOGE From SSA Access

More Friday Wins: Supreme Court Hands Trump Two Favorable Rulings on DOGE and the SSA


In its Friday decision, the 4th Circuit laid out some background regarding the claims at issue:

Three organizations representing a combined seven million Americans sued to prevent DOGE from accessing their members’ personally identifiable information. When the case was filed and in the original preliminary injunction proceedings, plaintiffs’ theory of the case was not that DOGE had misused the information or disclosed it (accidentally or otherwise) to malicious actors. Instead, plaintiffs argued that handing over non-anonymized and highly sensitive information to DOGE was itself unlawful.

In vacating the district court's order, the 4th Circuit looked to the four requirements for an injunction:

  1. likely success
  2. irreparable harm
  3. balance of equities
  4. public interest

The majority found that plaintiffs could not satisfy the irreparable harm requirement, reasoning that damages may be available later under the Privacy Act and/or that permanent injunctive relief may later undo the harm, and therefore, emergency relief is/was not justified at this point.

There's an added twist to this one that also bears note: The 4th Circuit actually walked back its own language from another recent DOGE ruling (American Federation of Teachers v. Bessent). Without wandering too far into the weeds here, in that case, the court had gotten a bit too intricate with its analysis, and now, in Friday's ruling, it reaffirmed the basic four-factor test referenced above. 

It also is worth noting that this decision was rather split, with multiple concurrences and dissents. The appellate judges are not all on the same page when it comes to the issues of standing and irreparable harm, as well as the effect of the Supreme Court's stay.

But in the end, this is a solid procedural win for the administration. The case will return to the district court, where the merits are still being litigated. We'll continue to keep tabs on it and report on any additional developments of note. 

https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2026/04/10/trump-admin-scores-a-big-win-at-4th-circuit-regarding-doge-n2201160?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

By All Means Let the War Crimes Trials Begin!

By All Means Let the War Crimes Trials Begin!

By All Means Let the War Crimes Trials Begin!
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

The Left and some on the Right went crazy over President Donald Trump's recent tweet.

He warned that if the Iranian regime did not cease blocking the international Strait of Hormuz, he would hit its dual military-civilian infrastructure. He promised that "a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again."

Trump may have used sloppy nouns.

But he obviously meant that the murderous civilization/culture of radical Iranian theocratic Islam would cease to exist and won't come back, once its power plants and transportation systems central to the regime were cut off.

Why do we know that?

Because, unlike most prior American wars, Trump has never targeted dual-use infrastructure – not in bombing ISIS, not in removing the Venezuelan thug Nicolás Maduro, not in the 2025 bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, and not in the present war – with the exception of a key bridge central to the regime's efforts to move around and spare missile assets from bombing.

Ever since Trump announced that "help is on the way" to the Iranian people, the entire aim of the five-week war has been to target selectively the command and control of the regime and its military assets.

The goal was to diminish its threats abroad, while weakening and humiliating the mullahcracy at home – so that soon the Iranian people might at last be able to overthrow the odious theocracy.

Trump's critics know all that.

But they see political advantage in tagging Trump as a Strangelovian madman, no different from the Nazi criminals in the docket at Nuremberg.

A few less unhinged argue his rhetoric nevertheless comes across as unpresidential.

Perhaps.

But it may be no accident that his Gen. Curtis LeMay-like bluster might have applied pressure on the Iranians to reopen negotiations.

On Monday, the Democratic Borg was declaring Trump a savage maniac. By Tuesday, it was blasting him as a TACO ("Trump always chickens out") for not carrying out what the day before they had dubbed a war crime.

The common denominator was an overarching deranged hatred of the president, given his critics can never decide whether he is Adolf Hitler or Neville Chamberlain.

But since the Left has called for investigations of war crimes, by all means let them begin.

Obviously, Trump's critics conveniently no longer buy the argument of "dual use." It posits that the juice powering an evil enemy is its roads, bridges, fuel, and electricity. To disable them supposedly shortens the war and the killing.

In World War II, we leveled a dozen Japanese cities because the Tokyo junta had outsourced the assembly of weapons to urban neighborhood workshops.

We joined the British in leveling Dresden by targeting German transportation.

Perhaps the Left will now remove the iconic names of Democratic Presidents Roosevelt and Truman from our buildings and monuments?

Truman should be a twofer boogeyman. He ordered every bridge in North Korea and hydroelectric plant to be incinerated during the Korean War.

How about the Lyndon Johnson/Richard Nixon bombing of North Vietnam? Their war machine annihilated most of its civilian infrastructure in efforts to force the communists to negotiate.

The 42-day bombing in the First Gulf War targeted power stations, roads, bridges, and dual-use government buildings.

Should we go back and Trotskyize its strategic architects – George H. W. Bush and Gen. Colin Powell?

Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly is one of Trump's fiercest critics in pressing the war criminal charge. Perhaps he too should be post-facto investigated by the International Criminal Court given that in 1991 he was a pilot in an air force that frequently hit bridges and other dual use targets.

How about the "noble" NATO effort in Serbia?

According to the logic of current critics, there must be lots of war criminals still to be found who were involved in that merciless 1999 bombing of Belgrade.

Former President Bill Clinton's gambit wrecked all the bridges on the Danube and often left over a million civilians without power.

Will we indict former President Barack Obama for ordering over 500 targeted predator assassination strikes on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border without congressional authorization that included killing four American citizens?

Perhaps we can reinvestigate Samantha Power, Hillary Clinton, and Susan Rice, the architects of the 2011 "unlawful" and congressionally "unauthorized" seven-month bombing of a mostly inert Libya.

And why not reexamine Obama? He snubbed the 60-90 War Powers Act window, which required him to obtain congressional authority to continue that mindless devastation.

The Libyan wreckage included civilian ships, port facilities, TV buildings, telecommunications, and government offices – and left the country an utter mess that continues 15 years later.

The left-wing and paleo-Right fury has far exceeded any legitimate critique of strategy and tactics.

It has now become not just incoherent but crazed, given many despise Trump more than they do the murderous Iranian regime.

And now they add the wage of rank hypocrisy to their serial untruths.

https://townhall.com/columnists/victordavishanson/2026/04/09/by-all-means-let-the-war-crimes-trials-begin-n2674182?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-jVXsmHxmBS&utm_term=&_nlid=jVXsmHxmBS&_nhids=ncxGeHz1sXokls

Sunday, April 12, 2026

CA AG Bonta Finally Uncovers Hundreds of Millions in Medical Fraud, Unbelievably Tries to Blame Trump

CA AG Bonta Finally Uncovers Hundreds of Millions in Medical Fraud, Unbelievably Tries to Blame Trump

AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes

California Democrat politicians are a special breed — they’ll point directly at a lovely blue sky and tell you it’s green. What’s so confounding to many, however, is that all too many voters will believe them despite their endless broken promise and lies.

Golden State Attorney General Rob Bonta is most known for filing endless gender cases and going after Trump. What he is not known for, however, is cleaning up the corruption in state government or doing much about the rampant healthcare fraud.

On Thursday, Bonta patted himself endlessly on the back and congratulated himself over the fact that he’d finally dug up some graft and was prosecuting 11 individuals:

The top state prosecutor says investigators caught 14 fraudulent hospice companies who had billed MediCal and Medicaid for $267 million in non-existent services after they received a tip from the California Department of Healthcare Services.

“This was a brazen, calculated criminal scheme that exploited the medical system, stole from the state of California and Medicaid and prevented services and care from going to sick individuals who actually need it,” Bonta said of the crime.

Bonta’s office filed felony criminal charges against 21 suspects for the healthcare fraud crimes.

Now if you could go ahead and figure out where the $24 billion in unaccounted for homelessness spending went, we’ll be good.

“While healthcare fraud might be President Trump’s shiny new political talking point. California DOJ has been going after healthcare fraud since 1979. For decades, Trump is late to the party.”

Note: It's debatable whether he said, "For decades, Trump is late to the party.” It could be argued that he said the state had been fighting "since 1979. For decades."

Regadless, what a galling statement, “Trump is late to the party.” Trump hasn’t been president for decades, genius, and he and his team investigating matters is the only reason you’re looking into them now.

It gets worse though: even as California is becoming known as the fraud capital of the United States, Bonta claims he’s been a fierce warrior throughout:

“This is just the latest example of the California DOJ’s long standing ongoing and successful efforts [against] hospice and MediCal fraud. We have been doing this work for years. We’ve been doing it successfully before certain people in this country decided to think about it for the first time,” he said.

Luckily I wasn’t sipping my coffee when I read that because I probably would have spit it out.


SHAME: Kevin Kiley Owns Gavin Newsom With Receipts That CA Is the True 'Fraud Capital of America'

DOJ Reveals $270M Medi-Cal Fraud Scheme That Exploited Oversight Gaps Under Newsom


First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli is unimpressed by Bonta’s rhetoric, and the two have gotten into a war of words on social media in recent days. Essayli triggered the attorney general by calling out California’s failure to fight fraud. Bonta clapped back, but Essayli finished him but good.

“Maybe you should spend more time prosecuting your own fraudsters and filling up your prisons, and less time cooking up political lawsuits against the Trump Administration,” he wrote.

Bonta bragging about his fraud efforts in California of all states is the height of hubris. Which means, should a Democrat take back the White House in '28, he’ll probably get a plum job in the administration.

https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2026/04/09/ca-ag-finally-uncovers-hundreds-of-millions-in-medical-fraud-unbelievably-tries-to-blame-trump-n2201133?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Comrade Mamdani Is Getting Smacked Around by Reality

Comrade Mamdani Is Getting Smacked Around by Reality

AP Photo/Andres Kudacki

Top O' the Briefing

Happy Friday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. There's a chia seed and Poker Dogs painting delivery at midnight. Apologies for any inconvenience.

Oh-oh, we may be looking at yet another instance of socialism that, gosh darn it, just wasn't done right. 

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani rode into office on a socialist unicorn after promising everything but free ice cream for life to the children of every voter. There are only two blocs in any electorate who vote for the kind of socialist utopian garbage that Mamdani spouted: young people who are too dumb to know any better, and older people who know better, but are so wealthy they don't care. The latter group is simply looking for a politician whom they might be able to control. Unfortunately, New York has a preponderance of both young, dumb voters and rich, bored voters. 

As those of us who paid any attention at all to 20th-century history know, socialism is known for its struggles with promise fulfillment. Mamdani is only 34, so his radical leftist fervor is fueled by the ignorance of relative youth. He got way out over his skis when telling voters what kinds of "free" goodies he was going to give Big Apple residents if elected. Now that he's in office, the cold water of reality keeps getting thrown in his face. 

This is from my friend and HotAir colleague John Sexton:

Yesterday Mayor Mamdani admitted that another one of his campaign promises won't be happening, at least not anytime soon. Remember his promise to make buses in NYC free? It was obvious to everyone that this was not something he could do on his own and in an interview with Politico he finally admitted as much.

That's not the only thing that Mamdani promised that was out of his hands. Later in the post, John details how Mamdani's promise of a rent freeze was never anything he could do unilaterally. 

A lot of people think that Mamdani knew all of this when he was campaigning, but I'm not willing to give him that much credit for cleverness. I think that he's running into a couple of things now, the first being that the wheels of governmental bureaucracy grind slowly even on their fastest days. Yes, he's dealing with a municipal bureaucracy, but it's the municipal bureaucracy of one of the biggest cities in the world. He's in way over his head dealing with its complexities. 

The second wall that Mamdani is beating his head against is the inevitable economic barrier that socialists always hit. He's not getting any help from the people in government who could help him deliver on his promises because what he wants is infeasible. 

Not to worry, commies of New York, there are still some things that Mayor Mamdani can screw up all on his own. This is from my Townhall colleague Jeff Charles:

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani publicly stated he would have the last word on all New York Police Department (NYPD) decisions — not Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch.

Like all leftists, Mamdani is a cop-hater, so this ought to get ugly. He prefers police who can't do any real policing. His wish list for the department looks to weaken it wherever he can. The NYPD is still reeling from the Defund the Police attack in 2020. There might not be any cops left in New York by the time Mamdani's one term is up. 

There is a possibility that the little commie might not make it through one term. It's the beginning of the second quarter of his first year in office, and the honeymoon is most definitely over. This is from a VIP post that Matt wrote yesterday:

A new Marist College poll gives Mamdani a mere 48% approval rating after just three months in office. That might sound decent in today’s fractured political climate, but context matters. Why is this so bad? Well, at the same point in his tenure, Eric Adams sat comfortably at 61%.

That's gonna leave a mark. We know how quickly New York voters soured on Eric Adams. Mamdani could fall out of favor even more quickly once they figure out that his entire campaign was a steaming pile of horse manure. Then again, these are the same people who gave the leftist mediocrity Bill de Blasio two terms. 

There were still cops in the city back in those days, though. 

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/04/10/the-morning-briefing-comrade-mamdani-is-getting-smacked-around-by-reality-n4951610/?utm_campaign=nl_pm&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjmediambvip