THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 4/19/2022
Ignorance=strength;
censorship=free speech
Most normal folks—the 90+ percent who don’t obsess over Twitter—have, nonetheless,
found the dustup over Elon Musk’s monetary attention and involvement with
Twitter to be curiously revealing. Musk is the world’s richest man; he got that
way by basically acquiring undervalued assets or companies with potential for
upward growth, building their services or product’s worth, and selling them for
a sizable “return on investment”. He calls himself a “libertarian”; seems problematic
for the left.
Their “concerns” morphed into frightened hysteria upon finding out that
his views on free speech and censorship targeted one of the most formidable
entities of enforcement of said censorship: Twitter. He has seriously,
financially capable intent on forcing conformity with the free speech side of
the equation. Twitter devotees: it threatens “World War 3” and “the end of
democracy” (Musk derangement syndrome?).
Fake righty Max Boot: “I am frightened by the impact on society and politics
if Elon Musk acquires Twitter…For democracy to survive, we need more content moderation,
not less.” Boot’s a Washington Post writer; the Post’s banner: “Democracy dies
in darkness.” Translation: For democracy to survive, we need Silicon Valley
elites “cancelling” the unacceptable.
All the “right (elite) people” hailed rich guy Jeff Bezos’ purchase of
the Washington Post; now they’re apoplectic over rich guy Elon Musk buying Twitter.
They support Twitter flooding the market with cheap shares of Twitter stock,
destroying existing shareholders’ value, in a vain, futile attempt to stop
Musk. Me: Bring on the social media earthquake, the creative destruction/reconstruction
of free speech Twitter.
“In George Orwell’s ‘1984,’ war is peace, freedom is slavery and
ignorance is strength.” To Robert Reich, Clinton’s Labor chief, Musk’s vision for
uncontrolled Internet and Twitter is not only “dangerous nonsense,” but also “the
dream of every dictator, strongman and demagogue.” Reich’s sentiments are mock-worthy
nonsense, summed up: “Censorship is free speech.” Despots invariably seek to silence
critics.
Left-leaners probably give a “thumbs up” for the transparent reason that
you think it benefits your side. That’s intellectual honesty, at least, but to
deny the reality of partisan censorship fools no one.
Examples abound: “Just last month, Issues & Insights reported a poll
it conducted with TIPP, the most accurate predictor of the last five
presidential elections, regarding people’s feelings about COVID. The survey
found 65% of Americans think COVID policy in the United States is ‘driven by
politics,’ with only 21% believing it’s ‘driven by science’…
“Google AdSense responded by labeling it ‘dangerous and derogatory
content’ and stripped its ads…In March I&I released a poll showing that 67%
of Republicans wanted President Donald Trump on the 2024 ballot while only 37%
of Democrats wanted President Joe Biden on the ticket. Google called this ‘unreliable
and harmful.’” (Glenn Reynolds, Nypost.com) It proves the power of Big Tech,
serving “regime” narratives.
A Supreme Court case decided that if something is illegal or
unconstitutional for the government to do, it’s likewise disallowed for the government
to impose that policy via the private sector doing the government’s bidding.
Think of Biden’s mouthpiece Psaki saying that social media companies should exercise
more censorship of content opposing Biden’s narratives or policies.
What greater example of public/private narrative censorship than what was
on display at The Atlantic’s “Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy” conference
at the University of Chicago. Conservative students asked polite, well-prepared
questions of elite mavens of news media, Ann Applebaum, Brian Stelter and
others.
Mr. Stelter was confronted with a calm recitation of major news stories
heavily promoted on CNN that were not only ultimately proven incorrect but
could have easily been debunked initially (conservatives did just that):
Trump-Russia collusion, Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax, the Nick Sandman and Catholic
school kids confronted by a rude Native American activist to whom was shown no
disrespect, fake rape allegations lobbed at Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and the
cover up of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.
Stelter disingenuously deflected, saying he would speak to the student
privately, while hypocritically refusing to utter any response to the student’s
litany of “fake news.” Ann Applebaum’s arrogant dismissal of the Hunter Biden
laptop story—as “not interesting” to her and “irrelevant” to the presidential
election—was an egregious “gaslighting” message to the gathered acolytes on the
proper attitude.
Not to be outdone, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg played the corporate
media’s trump card by calling reporting by the student paper, the Chicago
Thinker, on the evasiveness of those questioned, a “disinformation campaign.”
Says it all. Must of hit close to home to have their little “disinformation”
seminar compared to a “fire prevention speech from an arsonist, or a child
safety seminar led by a pedophile.
Especially so after the dissembler-in-chief, Barack Obama, “had the nerve
to help open the event, although his administration famously spied on the
Donald Trump campaign with a secret court warrant backed by the Hillary Clinton
campaign-funded Christopher Steele dossier which, in an ironic twist, was the
product of Russian disinformation. Democrats used this disinformation to
repeatedly smear President Trump and undermine the integrity of the 2016
election.
“Former chief advisor to the Obama administration David Axelrod moderated
two of Wednesday’s discussions…Axelrod still has the gall to repeat [on Wednesday]
the debunked Russian collusion hoax.”
The NYTimes and the Washington Post confirmed the contents of the Hunter’s
laptop, while laboring to absolve Joe Biden of any suspicion. Only a more
official, definitive examination will force Americans to accept that they were
hoodwinked by a media/political/intelligence cabal into voting for the most
corrupt politician to aspire to the presidency in America’s history, Joe Biden.
No comments:
Post a Comment