THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 1/16/2018
Mr. Statham’s vote; DACA notes
“Dr. King’s dream is our dream. It is the American
Dream. It’s the promise stitched into the fabric of our Nation, etched into the
hearts of our people, and written into the soul of humankind.” (excerpt from
President Donald Trump’s weekly address) I start with that quote because it
should be a sentiment that rises above partisan politics, as have many
utterances and proclamations by every American president, even Trump’s
predecessor, Barack Obama.
We have, however, reverted to a nearly tribal, “my
side good, their side bad” level of antipathy that was prominent during George
Bush’s term, well described as “Bush derangement syndrome” by Charles
Krauthammer. Had Bush miraculously walked on water, his haters would have
assumed he knew where the rocks were; had he healed someone, critics would have
charged him with wanting to deny disability payments for the person.
Acidic, anathema-laced comments following the posting
of Trump’s MLK tweet confirm that, for the Trump-hating-and-deranged left,
similar sentiments abound. I doubt, after reading Mr. Statham’s column (“My
take on the changing presidency”), that the Northern California native, past
Republican state representative and media figure is among the haters. His take
does, however, seem to conform to the “never Trump” cynicism among Republican
establishment types and Weekly Standard conservative critics that seem to
acknowledge no good deeds by Trump.
Perhaps Mr. Statham is unaware that Tehama County’s
vote went to Trump by 65 percent to Clinton’s 28 percent; Gary Johnson’s 4
percent were non-left libertarians and illustrate the massive anti-Clinton,
anti-Obama leanings locally. Would Mr. Statham grace us in a future column with
his chosen candidate for the primary (mine was Cruz) and for whom he voted for
president in November? Those names might help Republican Trump supporters
understand him. I may be the only Daily News opinion columnist that voted with
our super-majority for Trump.
Does Mr. Statham really believe that President Trump
doesn’t know “the ramifications of the tax cuts that he signed into law”? Was
it mere coincidence that America’s economy and taxes grew after both the
Kennedy and the Reagan tax cuts? Democrats are apparently congenitally
incapable of limiting spending on programs; that doesn’t undermine the wisdom
of cutting taxes.
Rather than offer generalized disparagement of
President Trump’s tweets, thereby committing the intellectual sin of letting
others do one’s thinking, Mr. Statham might use the Internet to find
“@realDonaldTrump” and read his actual words every day. I’m just saying it’s a
bit closed-minded to simply dismiss the communication of what may turn out to
be the most consequential conservative president in our lifetimes. The
economy’s up, judicial conservatives are on the courts, illegal immigration is
way down; businesses—particularly small businesses—are more confident than they
have been in decades. That polling number among America’s entrepreneurs is the
real presidential approval number since all Dems disapprove of Trump but even
Hillary’s voters can see their confidence in job-seeking and business success
growing.
Notably, author Bryan Garner, who traveled and
collaborated with Justice Scalia, wrote “Nino and Me,” a memoir of his
decade-long friendship with the late Supreme Court Justice. “Justice Scalia
thought it was most refreshing to have a candidate who was pretty much
unfiltered and utterly frank…He was fascinated by the fact that Trump was so
outspoken in an unfiltered way, and therefore we were seeing something a little
more genuine than a candidate whose every utterance is airbrushed.” Would
Scalia have found President Trump too frank? We don’t know.
Consider the related kerfuffle over what epithet Trump
may, or may not, have used in a meeting with six members of Congress looking to
provide protection to the children brought to America illegally by their
parents. Democrats utter epithets at their Trump-voting neighbors and states,
even at Israel. Kennedy, Johnson, Obama all had potty-mouths. Bovine scat is
nonpartisan.
The American people want 1) protection for children
who’ve done nothing wrong, 2) increased border security, and 3) an end to
“chain migration” and “lottery” systems. It would seem to reasonable people to
be a common sense deal: all of the above. However, the “open borders” Democrats
and reform/amnesty Republicans wanted Trump to sign on to something with
legalization first, no real changes to “chain” or “lottery” immigration and
nebulous, if ever, real border barriers. Without walls or double fencing, the
only thing preventing future waves of migrants hot-footing it across the border
is the commitment of future presidents to defending America’s sovereignty and
law. Obama didn’t. Democrats won’t ever do it.
I’m glad Trump expressed righteous indignation at
their insistence that we encourage people from “hell hole” nations,
because…diversity and multiculturalism. Just shut up if you don’t accept the
dilution of traditional western American values by importing people with little
or no respect for self-government, constitutional rights, religious and
personal freedoms and self-sufficiency. Are we hurt by accepting those from any
nation—even hell holes like Somalia, much of Africa, India or most
majority-Muslim nations—with skills, degrees and American values. No.
Moving on, I see Democrats making a big mistake by
digging in against seriously increased border security—they won’t approve of
the 700 miles of fencing/walls that they all voted for 10 years ago. They
refuse a reasonable compromise for getting the DACA children legalized and may
refuse to fund the government by Friday. If they force a government shutdown,
they won’t have Obama making the American people pawns in a massive propaganda
stunt with a “close the Washington monument/national parks” strategy. Trump
will shut down so much relatively unnoticed government activity that people
will say “Yeah, cut more of my taxes.”
No comments:
Post a Comment