THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 8/04/2020
Riots, trashing Barr, Obama’s lying
First,
can we all agree on something? Set aside other issues—“Vandalism Is Violence:
Destructive Riots Are Not ‘Just Property Damage’; Property rights are human
rights, and we discard them at our own peril.” (Brad Polumbo, Fee.org, 7/30) We
must not accept that political or legal disputes—over justice, race, law
enforcement, and (the stated BLM agenda) Marxist redistribution, destruction of
America and ending the nuclear family—entitle the aggrieved to resort to vandalism,
mayhem and arson.
When
supporters of such causes won’t express sustained condemnation, those very
causes become compromised and sullied, their supporters diminished. Over
decades, the greatest damage from violent “protests” and riots has been to
those least able to recover, those who benefitted from the economic blessings
of business and free enterprise in their own humble neighborhoods. Jobs, police,
food and drug stores, gone; gangs and drugs proliferate.
Consider
Detroit before and after the 1968 deadly riots, South Central LA’s Watts after
the “insurrections” over Rodney King and O.J. Simpson’s civil verdict, and
other cities. Portland, Seattle and Minneapolis will likewise be injured
economically, and in social justice and equity, long after the “antifa,” BLM
and other instigators have moved on to collect their subsidies, trust fund
payments and extorted funds.
“It
is impossible that Democrats do not know the difference between peaceful
protesters and rioters, but they mulishly pretend the latter are the former.
They either turn a blind eye toward the ongoing mayhem or maintain,
straight-faced, that the destruction is a righteous reaction to Trump. That is
the deal: No stratagem that paints the president and his administration as
deserving of anything more than contempt is beyond the pale.
“The
transparent point is a cynical political one: Don’t engage the opposition,
don’t talk out our disagreements. Portray the opposition with such anathema
that voting for the incumbent president in November would be too monstrous to
contemplate…
“It
means there is no point in having congressional hearings. What it portends,
though, is far more dire than that. It doesn’t matter how you feel about Donald
Trump or Bill Barr. A faction that would rather delegitimize than debate its
opposition can do that to anyone or anything. At that point, it’s about power,
not policy or progress. Anyone who wants power that badly shouldn’t be anywhere
near it.”
Andrew
C. McCarthy, in “Democrats Make Mockery of Barr ‘Hearing,’” used the above
stark and pointed terms for clarity and honesty over the disgusting, depraved
game Democrats and the left are playing. Disagree with that perspective all you
want, but when Nadler (Rep.-Antifa/BLM) et al reduce the dignity and purpose of
a congressional hearing—paid for by, and on behalf of, 340 million Americans
and the taxpayers—to a literal pillorying and vicious character assassination
of the Attorney General of the United States, they’ve truly lost it. A
cardboard cutout of Barr, thrown rotten produce, and shouted “shut up” could
have replaced Dems’ kabuki theater of “reclaiming my time” (29 times) ad
nauseam. They deserve electoral loss.
Look
up “Attorney General Barr Scorches Democrats; Congressional Dems get exposed on
their treacherous enabling of orgies of violence.” (Matthew Vadum, frontpagemag.com,
7/29), “AG Barr destroys Jerry Nadler in another House Democrat testimony
disaster,” (Michael Goodwin, nypost.com, 7/28); “The Top Ten Epic Moments
During the House Judiciary Committee Hearing With AG Barr” (M. Margolis).
In
perhaps the greatest (or worst) example of a supposedly exalted, respected
leader stooping to made-up examples of nonexistent injustices, you couldn’t do
better (or worse) than Barack Obama. Millions of us endured Obama’s pompous
pontifications of baseless, fallacious progressive pablum because we could
always turn him off.
“Barack
Obama’s Partisan Eulogy for John Lewis Reminded Many of the Paul Wellstone
Funeral,” by Matt Margolis, showed why the disingenuous use of complete
falsehoods in service of leftwing policy is now the standard Democrat strategy
for political advancement. “George Wallace may be gone, but we can witness our
federal government sending agents to use tear gas and batons against peaceful
demonstrators,” Obama claimed, repeating the falsehood that violent rioters
were “peaceful protesters.”
“Even
as we sit here, there are those in power who are doing their darnedest to
discourage people from voting,” he falsely claimed, “by closing polling
locations and targeting minorities and students with restrictive ID laws and
attacking our voting rights with surgical precision.”
Margolis:
There is no evidence that voter ID diminishes the ability of anyone to vote,
and a whopping eighty percent of Americans support Voter ID laws, including 77
percent of non-white Americans. Obama then falsely accused Trump of
“undermining the Postal Service in the run-up to an election that’s gonna be
dependent on mail-in ballots so people don’t get sick.” D.P.: Every word,
including “and” and “the,” is a lie. Trump’s mashing of facts, triumphalism and
self-promotion doesn’t come close.
Tucker
Carlson: “Obama Pouring Gasoline While Country Falling Apart From Racial Strife.”
“The country falling apart riven by racial strife and tribalism and one of the
most respected people in the whole country decides to pour gasoline on that and
compare the police to Bull Connor? As if America or Minneapolis is like
Birmingham, Alabama in 1963? It’s insane. It’s reckless.”
“Mean,
sanctimonious, and divisive is no way to go through life, but it’s the way
Obama has chosen. If he’d been the Obama of the 2004 DNC speech the country
would be much better off. But he never was that Obama; the speech was simply a
lie. And for the record, Bull Connor was a member of the Democratic National
Committee. That’s who Obama is, that’s what Obama does.” (Glen Reynolds)
No comments:
Post a Comment