THE
WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 8/11/2020
Schools,
Wu-flu—What do I care?
On the one hand—having
no kids or relatives with kids needing the in-person learning experience that
online, “remote” classes simply do not provide—what do I care? However, Tehama
County is simply a microcosm of educational and economic crises as many parents
are deprived of their livelihoods while tending to their children at home. Ironic
that many parents are working in retail, or would love to go back to work—but
many teachers don’t or won’t.
I do care that these impacts
in our rural, small town county will have repercussions contributing to
idleness, substance abuse, depression and hopelessness. Children, least able to
recover from lost valuable classroom learning and socializing, will suffer
perceptible grade-sliding. The public-school system will suffer as parents
gravitate to home-schooling, private or religious instruction which—don’t get
me wrong—is often superior to the “lowest common denominator” of instruction
while tolerating misbehaving kids.
It’s encouraging that RBHS
resumes, but disappointing that Corning “Schools to start year online,” (Daily
News, 8/8). The bias against classrooms may reflect a lack of respect for
science, data and common sense. K-12 age children are least affected by
COVID-19 (more likely to catch regular colds and flu) and should be welcomed into
classrooms with normal distancing, masks and cleaning.
Parents should be
confident to have kids in classrooms learning; teachers and employees should
feel free to assess their own age/underlying condition/risk and work in
classrooms or online. It’s only the post-high school age where the Wu-flu
becomes a bigger risk to health; even that is marginal up to the 40 to
50-year-olds. Around 80 percent of serious and mortal cases are 70 to 80+ years
old.
Lost in the supposedly
“scientific” criteria used to “guide” local school and business mandates, is that
it’s subjective and arbitrary. They’ll use selected numbers ignoring that COVID
is not equally, randomly distributed among all ages.
Ignored is the
historical experience, replicated in some countries like Sweden, of focusing
protection and quarantines on the vulnerable, infected groups, letting the rest
of the people live freely, carefully, while the “herd immunity” produces
widespread, natural resistance. Little of the “Asian,” “Hong Kong” and “Swine”
flu remains, although they killed nearly 400,000 in today’s terms.
Also ignored: the relatively
lower deaths and infections in many states and counties. California is about 29th
in deaths per million, about half the national rate (260 to 499), with most deaths
and infections in cities and urban counties. That suggests counties like Tehama
practice normal economic, social and school life. What do I know? I just read
the numbers (worldometers.info).
There’s much intentional
ignorance about Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) which, together with other drugs known
about in the medical field, has been used and has had clinical results
published and written about, as I’m doing here. There is also the drug
“Remdesivir” going through trials; vaccines are testing. Don’t be a passive
consumer of the drive-by Trump-hating, slanted coverage over HCQ. Even
successful vaccines work less than 100%; German studies have found that a
portion of adults have natural resistance simply due to lifetimes of colds and
flu.
Never in modern
medicine has animosity against a safe existing drug been spread absent actual
scientific testing. Shouldn’t intelligent curiosity suggest that documented,
anecdotal success in treating COVID by actual doctors be examined with an open
mind?
Look up “There’s a
Mountain of Evidence That Hydroxychloroquine is an Effective Treatment for
COVID-19” (Matt Margolis, pjmedia.com, 7/07). Decide for yourself if the
anti-HCQ hype is overblown. “Hydroxychloroquine Helps Poor Nations Overcome
COVID-19” (Vijay Jayaraj, stream.org, 8/06) provides documented, cite-worthy
links. President Trump used it, as well as some Democrats; see “Another Democrat Says
Hydroxychloroquine Saved His Life,” Matt Margolis, 8/08.
If the history of this pandemic
gets fairly written, hysterical anti-Trumpism will be seen as costing many
lives, just like we can say that the decision by NY Gov. Cuomo, sending
infected seniors back to nursing homes, killed thousands.
The sobering
anniversary, “Michael Brown killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri,” came
just after the leaked body cam recordings of the attempted arrest of George
Floyd in Minneapolis, MN. The coroner’s report showed that the cause of death included
congenital heart disease exacerbated by the drugs present in, and previously
used by, Georgy Floyd.
Don’t misinterpret
these words. A jury should weigh all the evidence and tell a judge if they
consider what the officers did to fit the criminal charges against them. The
cop held Floyd down by a “knee-to-neck” restraint, but the coroner found no
cause of death from windpipe or blood flow. The murder charge may be acquitted;
likewise, the charges against the three other officers, regardless of our view.
“This surely will not
sit well with those who have elevated Floyd onto the martyr’s pedestal, but
nearly all of these fateful decisions were made by Floyd himself. It was he who
passed the counterfeit bill that prompted the police response, it was he who
resisted the officers’ efforts to arrest him, and it was he who had used the
drugs that may have affected a heart already weakened by disease.” (J. Dunphy, pjmedia.com)
From the nonexistent
“hands up, don’t shoot” meme over the justifiable shooting of Michael Brown, to
the phony narrative of systemic racism and police brutality, to the apparent
non-murder of George Floyd—protests, riots, arson, anarchy and insurrection
have ensued over falsehoods.
On adding columnists:
Given the 2 to 1 ratio of voters on the right and left in Tehama County, it
should follow that, since this page has one pro-Trump writer and one anti-Trump
writer, the next addition should be a Trump supporter. Is that fair?
No comments:
Post a Comment