THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 11/30/2021
“Let’s
talk about…racism,” they say
Our national Thanksgiving
celebration is, and always has been, devoid of race, religious fanaticism or
clan and tribal animosity. Through presidential pronouncements, and
Congressional affirmation and assignment, it has been the purest of holidays, uniting
all in the admirable practice of giving thanks for life’s blessings: family,
abundance (past, present or hoped for), health, freedom, peace or national victory
in war.
Many provide those less
fortunate with meals or clothing; the needs of commerce prompted moving the holiday
to extend Christmas shopping. Still, there’s thanks to be had for expected gifts.
It’s regrettable that
we must endure the annual “Thanksgiving is sullied by the mistreatment of
Native Americans.” Progressive nags don’t possess the numbers or political and
cultural heft to abolish Thanksgiving; they’d replace it with… national self-flagellation,
weeping and gnashing of teeth over said mistreatment? (See “The war on Thanksgiving
is real and it’s spectacular,” Jazz Shaw, hotair.com)
Not to excuse unjust
practices by earlier Americans, it must be pointed out that 1) such practices
were endemic to some tribes and nations already in North and South America—slavery,
conquest, annihilation, even human sacrifice and cannibalism—and have been part
of conflicts between nations and ethnic groups for all of mankind’s existence.
There are no angelic peoples or “pure savages”;
2) Germs, steel and
gunpowder effectively predetermined which groups—Europeans particularly—would prevail
in the “New World.” The “small pox-laden blankets” trope is overblown; the
germs carried by otherwise peaceful, non-aggressive settlers were destined to
decimate native Indians. Unforgiving biology. Europeans were on the receiving
end of germs inherent in Africa, decimating them and their cattle.
3) Bemoan the fall of
the Aztecs all you want, but neighboring groups welcomed and helped the Spanish
conquistadores—whose numbers couldn’t have single-handedly defeated the Aztecs—due
to the inhuman oppression by Aztecs of those neighbors.
4) Be thankful that British-centric
colonization prevailed, with its Christianity- and rights-based forms of
governance. Other militarily superior nations would have done even worse to the
Indians; Christian values and sensitivities tempered anti-Indian fervor, limited
and abolished slavery.
A brief summary of the
true lessons of the Pilgrim’s first “Thanksgiving”: Governor Bradford
documented their collectivist, “communal” sharing of labor and its fruits. The “common
store” principle—from each according to their ability, to each according to
their need—was the first disastrous experiment in “socialism.” (see “America’s
First Socialist Republic” powerlineblog.com)
Native Americans helped
the settlers avoid starvation, sharing food production lessons from land and
sea. However, when “all” were charged with working for “all” to benefit, human
nature drove some—particularly young single men—to slack off. They resented
that the fruits of their labor helped the families of men who weren’t producing
what their offspring needed.
That communal economic failure,
not the inability to produce, is what nearly killed them off, according to Bradford.
Upon assigning a parcel to each family, together with the right to the fruits
of one’s labor, as well as “he who will not work, will not eat” policies—abundance
“miraculously” developed. Bartering with one’s excess enriched all. To this
day, socialist, collectivist economies suffer the same disastrous fate.
“Not working” under well-intended
COVID policies doesn’t result in starvation; it’s now become a lifestyle.
Declining unemployment claims do not a thriving economy make; 4.4 million
people quitting their jobs, while millions of job openings lack workers,
institutionalizes “slacker-dom.” Why avoid deprivation by working, like
generations before? The able-bodied collecting checks and benefits should work out
well.
A Salvation Army guide,
“Let’s Talk About…Racism,” perpetuates the “structural racism” canard: “the
overarching system of racial biasing across institutions and society…These
systems give privileges to White people resulting in disadvantages to People Of
Color.” Does the local S.A. believe such crap?
This is “Critical Race
Theory,” coming to a “Red Kettle” near you. Unless we White people engage in “ongoing
self-awareness and self-reflection…we (un) consciously uphold aspects of White
supremacy, White-dominant culture, and unequal institutions and society.”
Fret not, their “Study
Guide on Racism” frees us from “unintentionally perpetuating injustice.” Home
ownership, health, education and incarceration all reek of inequality, systemic
racism and disparate (racist) outcomes, for which the guide suggests that we Whites
deliver a “sincere apology.” As the crass saying goes, I got your sincere
apology right here, buddy. Methinks government funding pollutes your values.
In the upside-down, “through
the looking glass” view, the Christian church must repent—yes, the same
Christian church that weighed in against mistreatment of Indians, provided the
Christian, moral underpinnings of the abolitionist, anti-slavery movement, and
the laudable Civil Rights movements and legislation.
In the left’s twisted, abominable race
obsession: 1) a young, white Kyle Rittenhouse is a “white supremacist” for
shooting three white guys trying to kill him; but 2) ignore the racist
motivations of lifelong Black criminal Darrell Brooks, who killed 5, and injured
dozens of, White people (read “Waukesha killer Darrell Brooks’ enablers,”
thenewneo.com).
“Darrell Brooks shared
pro-Hitler memes, called for violence against white people,” by Lee Brown, (nypost.com,
11/24), documents rapper Brooks’ bragging that he was a “terrorist,” a “killer
in the city” and encouraged knocking “white ppl [the f—k] out.” He posted “in
support of BLM causes, George Floyd and black nationalism. He also has a post
about how to get away with running people over on the street.” (Andy Ngo,
11/21)
His massacre resulted
from “race-equity,” low/no cash bail, soft-on-crime, “social justice”
prosecutors that know law-abiding people will suffer. It’s just “eggs cracked
to make omelets” to the left.
No comments:
Post a Comment