THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 2/11/2020
Fanaticism, its costs and tendrils
Part
of me feels empathy, even sympathy, for those consumed by “Trump Derangement
Syndrome,” an obsession with President Trump, who just plain hate his guts, and
believe any report of perfidy, truth be damned. There is a place for fanaticism
and unrestricted emotion, devotion and anathema—sports, where the term “fan” is
shorthand for “fanatic.”
Nevertheless,
the definition: “a person with an extreme and uncritical enthusiasm or zeal, as
in religion or politics,” applies to excessive, overly exuberant support of
something. We can live with such positive, uncritical or irrational zeal. What
crosses the line and undermines civic harmony is not a recent phenomenon, as
our Founding Framers, who established or “constituted” our system of
self-government, knew from history.
The
French Revolution demonstrated that hundreds of thousands, even millions, could
be slaughtered by the unrestricted fanaticism, of all-powerful leaders and
their followers, to punish perceived enemies—damn the law. To this day, the
guillotine is reviled for enabling that wholesale slaughter.
The
Founders went to great—and greatly debated—lengths to assure that their form of
representative self-government, “a republic if you can keep it” (Ben Franklin),
would be resistant to the perversions and oppressions in forms of government
seen up to that point. By the time our Constitution was finalized and presented
to the “United States” for approval, previous governments had been seen,
analyzed and rejected: feudalism, monarchy, parliamentary and, most
importantly, pure democracy.
The
power of the dominant tribe is to impose its will on the less powerful, even obliteration
by force. Or, where 51 percent of the people can vote to oppress the 49
percent, without protections of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness (or
property).” Crudely put, the kind of democracy wherein 3 men in a group of 5
can vote for demanded intimacies with the 2 women.
Having
fought the Civil War, freed the slaves (thank Republican President Lincoln),
and labored for decades to assure the protection of racial minorities—while
enacting imperfect but ultimately peaceable treatment of Native
Americans—America now finds itself at the threshold of divisiveness rarely seen
in our history. It would be ideal to this writer if an independent-minded
citizen could pick between two or more parties and know that that choice would,
within the constitutional protection of rights, not open us up to the loss of
property, commercial, political or social freedoms.
The
adage—about how the government that can provide all you need can, by that same
power, take it away—is worth remembering. One political side blithely proclaims
its intention to abolish private health insurance and impose “Medicare for all;”
or mandate every detail of personal, business, industrial and energy policies
or practices under the “Green New Deal.”
Or
to effectively ignore not only borders but also the deportation of those who’ve
illegally entered this country, regardless of the crimes they have committed.
Illegals cost every other resident $2,000 to $6,500 (net after income to the
state) due to ill-conceived “sanctuary” laws. What good is the right to
self-defense of one’s family if the authorities refuse to protect society and
our citizens from illegal aliens free to destroy, harm, kill and usurp our
collective resources.
In
this context, consider the obsessive crusade by Democrats to effectively undo
the 2016 election, through impeachment of President Donald J. Trump (without,
of course, actually replacing him with Hillary Clinton). It has become not only
an exercise of raw legal and political power (even to imprison), but also a
means to marshal collective fanaticism to destroy enemies, as determined by their
hat slogan or opinion.
To
Democrats, Donald Trump didn’t legitimately win, or now govern, based on
Constitutional representative choices over purely democratic ones. Of course,
both terms of the last Republican President, George W. Bush, were rejected by many
Democrats for similarly convenient reasons. The leftist thought- and
political-leader class has assumed (to the Democrat electorate) an unassailable
authority to pronounce not only what is to be fervently believed or rationally
accepted, but also what is—by nothing other than simple assertion—true and
factual.
For
example: I’ve heard it asserted numerous times (recently by ABC’s authoritative
Terry Moran) that the Trump campaign could not have been illegally spied on or
“wiretapped” because the FISA (foreign intelligence court) warrant used against
Carter Page was authorized when he was no longer a campaign staffer. Perhaps
you’ve heard and believed that, to the detriment of Trump’s and his supporters’
truthfulness.
While
seeming irrefutable, it is a partial truth serving a total falsehood. Yes, Page
was no longer involved in the Trump campaign when the warrant was approved, but
the facts of a FISA surveillance warrant are this: The FBI and any other agency
covered by the warrant are permitted to investigate not only current activities
and communications but also activities, contacts, calls and emails going back
to and including the period when he was on Trump’s campaign.
The
surveillance authority then follows the tendrils of subject Page to those with whom
he interacted or called, thus giving agents a blanket permission to surveil not
only his network post-campaign but also the entirety of his contacted people up
to and including the candidate, and ultimately president, Donald Trump.
We
now know that those warranted surveillance activities were illegally obtained,
primarily by dozens of lies, misrepresentations, and omissions in at least two
of the four FISA warrants—as testified to by the Inspector General, the
Attorney General and the FBI Director. There will, if this nation’s justice
system is worth the blood and sacrifice of our Founders and warriors, be
accountability, judgements, fines and prison.
Calendar
item: Doug LaMalfa “meet and greet,” Feb. 20, 4 to 7 PM, Hampton Inn &
Suites, Adobe Road.
No comments:
Post a Comment