THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 7/24/2018
Rage-aholics,
hysterics, deranged left
The
Chinese curse, that you should “live in interesting times,” suggests that we
are accursed; however, it would apply to different people for different
reasons. Let’s acknowledge that the segment of voters that went from voting for
Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton consider themselves perhaps the most accursed,
if their level of consternation and uttered vitriol is to be believed. Obama
voters who went to Trump—not so much say the polls and interviews.
I
see the former as mostly those who live in political “quiet desperation” for
having built their future happiness and fulfillment on a continuation of the
leftward trend—so ably-but-fleetingly implemented by Obama—under a
just-as-liberal President Clinton. With the “right” legislation and judges
signed and appointed, and the wrong ones stymied, with the regulatory branch
protected and expanded and with the glorious blossoming of “Hope” across
America, all would be as it was destined in perpetuity.
Welcome
to the realm of the politically disappointed, most recently occupied by George
W. Bush voters consigned to the woe-is-us camp for Barack Obama’s 8 years. If
our experience is any guide, you will fill your days bemoaning the utterances
from the “clown-in-chief,” be gob smacked that this guy got elected and, worse,
is using his pen/phone/appointment power to do what he said he’d do (in Obama’s
case, little that he promised). You may find yourself buying devices to protect
your teeth from grinding at night.
However,
there is a group, either growing or just getting louder, that are quite evidently
deranged; hence the Trump Derangement Syndrome label. In their hysterical venting,
they’ve morphed into “rage-aholics” and, psychologically, resemble the
syndromes that substitute booze, drugs, gambling or other vices for elation and
fulfillment. As with those dependencies, unhealthy reliance on self-destructive
patterns of anger and rage-filled outbursts alienates those nearby but is often
enabled by others’ rationalizations.
Witness
the hysterical outbursts and reactions to President Trump on a near daily basis
(i.e. Whoopi Goldberg). One revealing example was a demonstration in front of Rep.
Maxine Waters’ office in L.A. It was meant to be a “physical” confrontation by
Waters-supporting leftists with “Oath Keepers,” who are, depending on your
ideology, principled advocates for Trump and America—or racist, right wing Nazis.
Given the violence that predictably arises in these confrontations, the Oath
Keepers declined to show up.
What
did happen, however, served up an example of the radical left’s antics,
duplicitous labeling and complicit media air-brushing. They yelled, screamed,
stole a flag off a nearby truck, ripped foliage off bushes, added lighter fluid
and proceeded to burn it while displaying hand- and pre-printed-signs. The L.A.
Times offered a generally positive view of the pro-Waters, anti-Trump crowd,
mentioned the burning of the flag but ignored the rest to, apparently, protect
their readers from unpleasant reality.
Doing
the job that American news media avoid, the British press (Daily Mail) provided
a more sullied picture: “Shocking photographs…show the crowd stomping on the
flag before circling around the stars and stripes as they cheer when it erupts
into flames…they shouted: ‘This is not the American flag, this is their flag.’”
“Many
have been appalled that Democrats like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez have come out of the closet as socialists. They are sometimes
referred to as the far-left wing of the Democratic Party. But given recent
events, one is entitled to wonder whether there is any wing to the Democratic
Party other than the far-left. At (the rally), some demonstrators carried
printed signs produced by a group called RefuseFascism.org”
(Powerlineblog.com).
According
to Wikipedia: “Refuse Fascism was formed by a group of leftists, including the
Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) after the 2016 election. The RCP has said
they issued the call to action which launched the group.” Get it? Hardcore
Communists formed the pro-Waters/anti-Trump group.
“So,
to recap: 1) Many Democrats, apparently including the party’s most stalwart
supporters, are anti-American. 2) A good number of Democrats are socialists; in
fact, but for the DNC having its thumb on the scale, a socialist probably would
have won the party’s presidential nomination in 2016. 3) It is fair to wonder
how many ‘socialist’ Democrats are Communists who haven’t yet come out of the
closet.
“Only
two kinds of socialist governments have ever existed, National Socialist
(fascist) and International Socialist (Marxist). Has any reporter ever asked a
self-proclaimed Democratic Socialist which type of socialism he or she
embraces? I don’t think so. The Democrats aren’t really trying to hide who they
are, but the liberal press is doing its best to cover up its party’s extremism.”
(J. Hinderaker).
Here’s
a quick history lesson: The American version of Communism, “Progressivism,” was
embraced and advanced in America by Democrats like President Woodrow Wilson.
Watered-down Communism, or socialism, was integral to FDR’s New Deal, limited
only by the Supreme Court’s rejection of NIRA (National Industrial Recovery
Act) as being un-constitutionally broad and intrusive into the free market.
Actual Communist spies found undercover homes in some of FDR’s agencies,
attempting to steer American foreign and domestic policy in favor of the
U.S.S,R (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics).
After
the Korean War, fought to resist naked Communist aggression,
anti-American/South Vietnam and pro-Communist/North Vietnam agitation was the
core of the Democratic Party’s foreign policy, which subsequently favored Communist
regimes in Central America and Cuba. At the same time, hard leftist parts of
the Democratic Party abandoned the label “Socialist” so as to pursue socialist
goals for America from within the Democratic Party.
Throughout the rest of the
Cold War, Democrats like Ted Kennedy, Ron Dellums and many others, spared no
effort to undermine President Reagan’s anti-Soviet, pro-missile defense
policies; Kennedy’s even conspired with Soviet diplomats to undermine Reagan’s
reelection.
Compare
the Obama/Clinton “doormat” policies toward Russia with Trump’s harder actions
and it puts Trump’s verbal gaffes into perspective. Churchill’s actual quote,
“Meeting jaw to jaw is better than war” seems to be Trump’s policy. I can’t
disagree.
No comments:
Post a Comment