THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 10/17/2017
Trump’s mantle: erasing Obama-ism
It doesn’t take long to see how any given segment of
nightly network news misuses its resources and airtime to engage in partisan
ideological propaganda and disinformation operations slanted against President
Trump. Refuting their biased bilge would take considerably more time and space
than the original pieces themselves but some impressions jump out. Their
message, in both the particulars and general tone, is one of lopsided opinion,
bordering on advocacy, undifferentiated from the talking points and messaging
of the Democrats’ spin operations like Media Matters, leftist think tanks and
DNC twitter/email blurbs.
Two major initiatives—Trump’s unraveling of
unconstitutional Obamacare funding schemes and the unconstitutional non-treaty
with Iran—were both padded with analysis from critics, Democrat talking points
and hysterical predictions of catastrophe. The broadcast coverage relegated arguments,
in support of Trump’s overdue corrections to leftist overreach by Democrats and
Obama, to snippets from Republicans or, in one network piece on the Iran
nuclear “deal,” one single comment from Israeli’s leader, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Lost to any consumers of the media’s slanted coverage
would be, for instance, the simple, irrefutable facts surrounding Obamacare’s
funding manipulation of the budget process specified in the Constitution,
wherein no money can be spent on or dedicated to federal projects without
authorization by Congress. The payments to insurance companies—not, as they
would have you believe, to poor, resource-less purchasers of life-sustaining
health insurance policies—are an unprecedented subsidy of a previously
demonized but federally regulated industry.
Health insurance companies were tasked with and
induced, by the promise of said subsidies, into acting as the administrators
for the government takeover of our nation’s health care system. The scheme
involved making an end run around the single major impediment to socialized
health care: the health insurance companies that proved formidable opponents to
the last attempt to take over health care, Hillary Clinton’s health care fiasco
in the 1990s as first lady and erstwhile health care guru.
This time Obama/Pelosi/Reid et al were assured of
insurance industry complicity, in their power grab of America’s remaining free
market health insurance, by mandating the purchase of insurance by all
citizens—a hitherto unthinkable intrusion into our economic system. The
mandated insurance cost, whose expense would be vastly inflated by requiring
one-size-fits-all coverage requirements concocted by policy wonks (not
consumers), was to be subsidized from general tax revenues.
As the courts decided, there was no explicit
permission within the Affordable Care Act for general funds to be given to
insurance companies, making the billions of dollars of subsidies illegal.
Obamacare’s Gordian Knot of mandates effectively removed the option for
insurance companies to formulate policies tailored for Americans’ individual
and family needs. Trump’s additional executive decisions will also allow such
flexibility to return to the market.
This is what truly rankles the progressive left: 1)
That Americans would engage in the free market health care system by acquiring
insurance and heath care arrangements like health savings accounts, medical
concierge contracts, and major medical policies that allow the payment of
routine health care out-of-pocket. 2) That we might form associations (as in
“freedom of…”) with other citizens, other businesses and other like-minded
groups. Insurance companies are capable, absent federal micromanagement, of
assessing risks and paying for covered expenses that would range from
maintenance and out-patient care to life-threatening events and diseases.
The New York Post’s F.H. Buckley explains: “Obama kept
the Affordable Care Act looking healthy via an extra-constitutional grant of $1
trillion to health-insurance companies. That required congressional approval,
and Obama’s decision to bypass Congress was held unconstitutional by a federal
court. President Trump’s decision Thursday to halt the bailout makes the
litigation moot and represents a return to constitutional government.
“The same can be said of Trump’s Friday decision to
throw the Iran deal back to Congress, by refusing to certify that Iran is in
compliance with the deal. Recall that this was a treaty that should never have
been adopted without two-thirds approval in the Senate, as required by the
Constitution. That didn’t happen — because a compliant Republican Congress
passed the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, which provided that the president
certify to Congress every 90 days that the suspension of sanctions against the
regime is ‘appropriate and proportionate’ with respect to its illicit nuclear
program.
“And that’s what Trump didn’t do. He didn’t tear up
the treaty, or even decertify anything. Rather, he failed to certify, and
simply told the truth. Iran isn’t permitting the nuclear inspections the treaty
contemplates, and the Revolutionary Guard, which controls much of the
government, is a terrorist organization. The regime is building missiles that
threaten us and our allies, and its infractions don’t justify our continued
suspension of sanctions.”
Following in President Reagan’s footsteps, President
Trump rightly decided to withdraw America from the United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in protest of its blatant,
long-standing anti-Israel bias, corruption and Palestinian influence.
I will take Mr. Minch’s admission of “clumsy” and
“easily misunderstood” writing as a retraction of erroneous statements. I’ll
continue refuting Ken Burns’ “Vietnam War” next week.
No comments:
Post a Comment