THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 10/10/2017
Gun violence; island grids,
graft
Re: The massacre in Las Vegas, and the
hurricane-spawned destruction of Puerto Rico. The mass murderer was diabolical
and meticulous in his well-planned carnage; tens of thousands of concert-goers
presented the kind of soft target preferred by Islamic terrorists (no such
connection has yet surfaced). The stories of heroism uplift us even as the
senselessness of the crime almost induce fatalistic resignation over the
futility of stopping it.
Cheap and disingenuous anti-gun talking points flew
over the airwaves and out of politicians’ mouths before blood dried, the bodies
removed and the killer’s weapon’s collected. Fully automatic machine guns have
been illegal without special permit; Obama’s ATF gave the ok for “bump stock”
modifications to turn semi-auto into fully automatic guns. None of the proposed
gun laws would have kept this killer from his carnage. 58 dead innocents are
dwarfed by any year’s worth of gun-restricted Chicago violence. It’s all
liberal, gun-grabbing hypocrisy.
Nancy Pelosi proclaimed her desire for a “slippery
slope” of anti-gun laws and Australian-style forced “buy back” confiscation.
The NRA rightly says that all ATF has to do is reverse its rules on “bump
stock” devices. They were only designed to allow handicapped shooters access to
armed self defense. Moreover, assertions of America’s widespread gun violence
skirts the glaring discrepancy of urban shootings by criminals, heeding no
existing restrictions, compared to rural parts of those same states that have
no more homicides by firearms than, say, Canada or Europe.
In Puerto Rico’s situation, the
Trump-hating-and-deranged leftist news media failed to offset, with easily
available facts, their hollow attempts to make it into his “Katrina” of failed
federal response. The island suffered from numerous problems of its own making:
Infrastructure—roads and power grids—was shortchanged by budgets devoted to
public sector benefits, union wage structure and graft. Minimum wage mandates
reduced employment, creating poverty, as they do wherever applied. Corporations
fled the island when favorable tax policy changed over Democrat-inspired
complaints about supposed “tax giveaways.”
Manipulated public outrage over the U.S. Navy’s port
on the island of Viequas drove the Navy out of Puerto Rico, taking its $300
million contribution to the economy with it. 80 percent of the island’s truck
drivers didn’t show up to transport relief supplies from central hubs.
Liberalism and massive public debt, not President
Donald Trump, failed Puerto Rico long before hurricane landfall. Look up,
“Trouble on Welfare Island; Overbearing government and the welfare state are
hurting the United States' poorest citizens,” at The Economist.
Correcting the Vietnam War record is essential; I’ll
not leave that worthy effort until it is finished because much of the last 40+
years of Democrat and leftist anti-American propaganda derives from that failed
war. It’s been said that victory has many fathers while failure and defeat are
orphans. American military blunders and strategic mistakes wasted years of what
could have been accomplished before 1969. The war’s prosecution could have been
vigorously maintained by both Presidents Johnson and Nixon for the purpose of
first, defeating the North Vietnamese Army and the civilian infrastructure
supporting it, and second, keeping the South Vietnamese supplied with promised
replacement equipment and arms as well as American bombing support.
For now, look up “Notes on the Ken Burns version,” by
Scott Johnson, and “Be skeptical of Ken Burn’s documentary,” by Terry Garlock.
Lewis Sorley’s “A Better War” is solid research.
At numerous times during our summer travels, the
exclamation, “It’s a trap!” (as in “tourist trap”) became a short laugh line.
Watching some of my recorded shows, I found no shortage of the phrase in, for
instance, episodes of “Star Trek” and “Battlestar Galactica.” In “Batman,”
Robin shouted, “Holy rat-in-a-trap, Batman!” over one of Joker’s machinations.
I was chagrined to find Mr. Minch taking the bait and
getting caught in a trap of his own making by “doubling down” in responding to
simple statements of my position against, and polling on, the contentious issue
of athletes protesting the national anthem by sitting or kneeling. Attentive
readers may have learned three things: 1) Minch heeds not the one time
expressed desire of the editor that columnists refrain from attacking other
columnists—his jibes at “the Tuesday columnist” have appeared in many of his
pieces, as well as at other writers; 2) He approves of the protests against the
national anthem; 3) He doesn’t hesitate to use made up quotes to
mischaracterize what was plainly stated in my columns.
This is not an attack; defending myself is within the
bounds of propriety. I’ll not repeat his snide, malicious description of my
writing from last Friday’s “I say.” What must be affirmed is that it’s
contemptible to make up, out of whole cloth, a statement that I in fact have
not made. Mr. Minch wrote, “Don stated that the Ken Burns PBS documentary on
the Vietnam War was slanted by suggesting it was not a ‘good war’ and that
58,000 dead U.S. (sic) serviceman was too high a price to pay, plus, we should
have pulled out of that war long before we did.”
I reread every relevant paragraph from my summer
columns and found no such “statement.” That’s a fabrication of someone else’s
words; it is especially reprehensible when my columns are readily available and
posted in Daily News archives and, on every Tuesday, at DonPolson.blogspot.com.
Mr. Minch, please retract your accusation on the basis of inaccuracy; it should
be below the standards for even a local writer to make such a quote up. If Mr.
Minch disputes Mr. Lewis Sorley’s quotes and authoritative accounts of the 1968
to 1975 period of the Vietnam War, ask me for his sources and I will provide
them. They’re irrefutable.
No comments:
Post a Comment