THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 7/28/2020
Politicizing Wu-flu, schools, economy
First,
a math correction: In estimating the number of deaths from the 2009-2010 H1N1
“Swine flu,” if that flu had been as lethal as the COVID-19 pandemic, there
would have been over 260,000 deaths, not 2.6 million. Obama took little action
from inception in April, 2009, until proclaiming a national emergency in
October. There were about 14 times current infections (61 million vs.
4,335,000), which could have resulted in 20 times the deaths, almost 300,000.
Clinton/Gore/Biden advisor Ron Klain admitted it was “fortuitous” more didn’t
die, because they “did nothing right.”
News
media continues “scare-mongering,” as I see it. Those below 50- to 60-year-olds,
have little more risk of death from the “Wu-flu” than they do driving; most COVID-19
deaths are among elderly, 70+ residents of nursing and care facilities. In
spite of the absence of school-age infections, we are told—by decrees from on
high and loud voices in the teachers’ unions (sorry, “educators’ associations”)—that
it’s too risky to restart in-person classes. Again, let teachers with
vulnerable situations find other roles.
A
cartoonist illustrated: First, a wild-eyed, screaming teacher who doesn’t want
to go back to work and wants schools closed because “it’s too dangerous being
around all those kids!” Then, a stern, skeptical woman whose been working the
whole time around thousands of customers per day because—it’s her job.
I’m
sure this doesn’t apply to level-headed local teachers and their union—all
funded, I remind readers, from the taxes of the parents of the children they
were hired to teach and whose sole interests they serve. It is, moreover, essential
for our economic health and vitality that parents—who rely on public schools
and entrust their children to local classrooms—be able to earn their living.
Would
it be cynical to think that teachers’ unions place a higher priority on holding
students—and by extension, the national economy—essentially hostage to their ultimate
political goal, to beat Trump? They are as dedicated to President Trump’s
defeat as they are to being foot-soldiers for the Democrat Party.
The
uptick in deaths—after dropping from almost 2,500 per day to around 500 per day
and now about 900 per day—suggests that the spike in new infections, from
21,000 to almost 70,000 per day, are not creating the same need for radical
“lockdown” measures as in March/April. Again, my cynical (usually correct) side
concludes that the only “rationality” involved is the certainty that the only
way the Democrat left can defeat Trump is to keep the economy in the tank.
Why
else would we be harangued over Florida, Texas and Arizona—which are #s 24, 32
and 15 on the deaths per 100,000 scale? At 20 to 42 deaths per 100,000, they’re
way behind New Jersey and New York (168-177 deaths) and Connecticut and
Massachusetts (123-124 deaths). Could it be that the hysteria focuses on
Republican-run states because (to media) there’s “nothing to see” in the
disastrous Democrat-run states?
We
can all acknowledge that this “novel” virus was at first scary and highly lethal,
justifying harsh “lockdown” measures. We cannot return to constitutional,
representative self-governance without thoughtful, objective analysis: given all
the responses by other advanced nations, our draconian “directives” and
“guidance” have been only marginally effective.
Sweden’s
open-but-informed approach handled the virus better than, say, New York—without
economic harm. Models have been very flawed; yet more are presented without
admissions of prior error. See “The Models Were Wildly Wrong about Reopening
Too,” by P. W. Magness, aier.org, 7/23.
“So,
what is the goal at this point? Are we to wear masks until COVID is completely
eradicated in the U.S.? Until we have zero cases? And once COVID is eradicated
(it won’t be, but stick with me here), shouldn’t we continue to wear them until
the flu is eradicated? And the common cold? Rotavirus? RSV?
“We’re
being told that if we love our neighbors (and, by the way, you’re not a real
Christian if you don’t’ want to wear a mask) we should be happy to wear a mask
to protect them from COVID-19. If that’s the case, we’re going to have to
continue to wear them until all contagions have been purged from the face of
the earth—in other words, forever.” (“They Keep Moving the COVID-19 Goalposts:
Will the Next Step Be Masks to Protect From the Flu and the Common Cold?” by
Paula Bolyard, 7/24)
The lunatic, Trump-Deranged left was on full display through weeks of anarchist-, antifa- and BLM-instigated rioting, burning and injuries to cops and civilians, conveniently dovetailing with “protests” predicated on the fatuous claim of widespread, systemic police brutality and racism. Trump then nudged the lunatic insurrectionists, using camo-clad DHS and BORTAC officers to protect federal property—identified by patches and legitimately assigned under the Constitution as has been done since the United States’ founding. 1) They’re not “secret police” if we know about them and 2) they took someone into custody like plainclothes cops do every day, 3) read them their rights and finally 4) release them if they have no charges. Be afraid, the “tyrant” will cancel elections…
Trump
and those on our side rightly label the riots and violence: insurrection,
revolution and treason (the penalty should be…). That drives the likes of Nancy
Pelosi and Congressman (former Black Panther) Bobby Rush into paroxysms and
spittle-laced cries of “stormtroopers,” “armed militia,” “tyrant,” “Nazi” and,
of course, Ku Klux Klan “lynch mob.”
Pay
no attention to real, brutal tyrants like Kim Jong-un, Xi Jinping, Ayatollah
Khamenei or Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Democrats accuse Trump of something only
Democrats actually do: refuse to accept election results (Gore, Kerry, Hillary
Clinton, Stacey Abrams). More to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment