THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 6/30/2020
The left is saying overthrow America
160
years of insurgency, terrorism, treason and oppression of opponents has ensued
from Democrat-led and -tolerated leftism/progressivism. “Resistance” is their
word; it has analogies to Southern states’ “resistance” to the imposition of
Federal authority post-Civil War, for the indisputably laudable goal of protecting
the constitutional rights of newly-freed African-Americans. I’ve seen videos of
white “Antifa/Black Live Matter” radicals screaming the n-word into the faces
of black police officers. Disgusting.
For
informed analysis, look up: “The Movement to Destroy a Nation,” by Shireen
Qudosi, clarionproject.org; “The Left Pushes to Finally Take Down America,” by Michael
Walsh, theepochtimes.com; “Raheem Kassam says the Democratic Party has declared
war on America and its institutions.” Peruse those three articles before saying
we are wrong about the left.
To
be sure, some statues warrant removal, but the civilized, constitutional method
is to sway public sentiment and achieve a consensus that prompts elected
officials to take action. It’s decidedly not to gather a violent mob to deface
and destroy public property, some of which is dedicated to the very
cause—Lincoln freeing slaves, and African-American Union troops—they supposedly
support. Look up “CNN’s Coates Excuses Anarchy: Statue Vandalism Is ‘Symbolic Speech’”
by Alex Christy.
Indeed,
one of the statues found intolerable by the violent, insurgent left is
President Andrew Jackson, whose term sought to crush the Ku Klux Klan, the
terrorist arm of the Southern Democrat party’s “resistance” to the imposition
of (in their view Northern Republican) federal authority. During the Civil War
we had “draft riots” in New York City where South-sympathizing, Democrat men
engaged in insurrectionist violence against President Lincoln’s draft laws.
“Jim
Crow” laws, poll taxes and the Klan’s terroristic intimidation of black
citizens all had the goal of preventing them from exercising their rights under
the Constitution. Not the least of those rights was the first true use of the 2nd
Amendment’s primary purpose: The inviolable God (not government)-given natural
right to self-defense, so that Southern black Republican citizens could ensure
their very existence against “Jim Crow” Democrat despotism.
Current
turmoil—the street violence of rioting-not-protesting activists against,
ostensibly, racial injustice and police brutality—has now morphed into “burn down
this system” (BLM leader). That’s resulted in around 700 damaged, burned and
destroyed businesses in Minneapolis, MN and countless other destroyed, defaced
and impacted businesses, churches and law enforcement assets. News media moved
on from that issue—violence inuring to Trump’s benefit—to the previous campaign
to sully Trump with rising Covid-19 infections. In spite of clearly protest-contact
upward trends, mortality has declined from 2,500 to about 600 deaths per day.
The
dead and injured officers—who comprise among the most heroic, self-sacrificing,
principled protectors of America’s citizens—and innocent bystanders are a grim
testament to the newly-unleashed anarcho-terrorists. They have historical
precedents going back to the French Revolution’s “Reign of Terror,” the “brown
shirt” street brigades’ violence against perceived enemies of Hitler’s Nazi
regime, and the Chinese “Cultural Revolution” of youthful Maoist, Little Red
Book-wielding dispensers of state violence.
That
resembles the current case. The dovetailing of mass protest/riots with
quasi-official elements of “resistance”—in local and state governments, the
Democrat-appointed judiciary and their cheerleading justifiers in academia,
entertainment and news media—constitutes a “full court press” of intimidation
unseen since the 60s race riots and 200 bombings by SDS/Weather Underground
radicals.
Who
is targeted? Elected officials, who are browbeaten by calls to “defund/dismantle”
the police. The relatively rare misuse of authority by law enforcement doesn’t warrant
the wholesale undoing of the only entity, equipped and authorized to exercise
force to protect our citizens, the poorest of which (mostly minorities) bear
the heaviest burden of violent criminal behavior.
Also
targeted: the vast middle class, of all races, that see riots, looting and
arson in cities and blocks from their homes, employers and businesses—which represent
decades and lifetimes of striving within the laws and norms to acquire for
themselves and their families some abundance and comfort. It’s a thinly-veiled
agenda of alienating voters away from the Republican, conservative, President
Trump side—to the Democrats who offer seeming relief from the turmoil, as frustrated
and scared citizens say “just make it stop”.
A
recent Harvard Harris poll found that 60 percent of Americans have a favorable
view of the police; 64 percent think that most police operate fairly and
according to the rules. Blame for riots: 27 percent blame the police; 53
percent blame the protesters. Only 28 percent want the police defunded.
Let’s
all agree with the Reverend Martin Luther King, 1960: “Black supremacy is as
dangerous as white supremacy, and God is not interested merely in the freedom
of black men and brown men and yellow men. God is interested in the freedom of
the whole human race and the creation of a society where all men will live
together as brothers, and all men will respect the dignity and the worth of all
human personality.”
Would
that we could all agree on what racism is. Some see only systemic
discrimination against minority groups, for which all whites bear a burden.
Others limit racism to assuming negatively, prejudging and acting against an
individual or group based solely on their race. The problem is that those
adhering to the former view won’t accept, or “tolerate” if you will, that we
who hold the latter view won’t personally accept the burden of guilt for the
racism of others.
I
don’t accept group guilt over individual accountability. Let every human heart
grow in acceptance and love of others, no matter their superficial differences.
Can I get an “Amen”?
No comments:
Post a Comment