THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 12/31/2019
The “fake news” parade won’t stop
Looking
back a year multiplies the difficulty of the task; rather than last week’s
news, things stand out from 2, 5 or 10 months ago. My January 1, 2018 column
found a government “shutdown” (involving “nonessential” workers unnoticed by 99
percent of Americans, now remembered by zero percent) screaming in headlines.
President Trump determined that the shutdown would have a light burden on we,
the people.
Barack
Obama had “weaponized” his shutdown for maximum inconvenience of veterans who
had planned on visiting the WWII memorial, or weddings depending on access to
public lands. Dems may have found the tactic unhelpful to besting Trump in
public opinion.
Illegal
immigration—with its criminal violence and the inherent anti-American, anti-rule-of-law
of so-called “sanctuary” policies—earned some space last January, as I
recounted the lessons in “Death by Sanctuary State.” To wit, the death of 1)
legal residents at the hands, guns or cars of illegals, and 2) those enticed to
try to slip across a river, around a fence or overstay a visa to lawlessly use
our resources, or take American jobs. Recent deportations of illegals created
job openings for African-Americans, 20% of whom will vote for Trump. Trump has cut
illegal immigration; he’s saved lives.
The
responsible truthfulness of local news reporting was compared to the
agenda-driven, fact-checking-be-damned, Democrats-with-bylines’ puerile bilge
from the networks, the AP, the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC.
We’ve had a year since then to compile a record of news misreporting, political
skullduggery, anonymous hearsay, baseless conjecture and projection by media.
Someone
suggested that the “fake news” label could be avoided for any news outlet that
devotes the same time or space correcting the record as they did promoting
erroneous, inaccurate news. In October, the New York Times provided an anecdote
to drive a phony narrative: A 69-year-old Pennsylvania Trump voter that regrets
his 2016 choice. It sent itself throughout the land without the benefit of
fact-checking by the anti-Trump media.
It
took an independent right-of-center skeptic to ask the local registrar a simple
question, the answer to which was “No, the man had not actually voted in the
presidential election, let alone vote for Trump.” Look up “Desperately seeking
regretful Trump voters,” by John Hinderaker, for more on the story.
You
can easily see how the process would inconvenience the media’s Democrats,
cutting into their breathless reporting on the next made-up scandal or
dastardly deed by President Trump. They would have to spend 3 years correcting
the mistaken, made-up hoax of Trump/Russian collusion. Rachel Maddow’s head
would explode to have to undo every minute of furrowed-brow, emotionally overwrought,
unverified Trumpian abominations that never happened.
In
“Fakiest News of 2018,” Powerlineblog.com’s Scott Johnson noted “fake news”
from McClatchy News (or substitute another news source); they reported that
one-time Trump attorney (and proven fabulist) Michael Cohen had traveled to
Prague “to work out the details of Trump’s collusion with Putin.” It never
happened; did the correction get the same prominence as the original story?
If
you come across any of these books, they are worth your time and money and, for
Trump opponents, may help to dispel misplaced anger and accusations of
constitutional perfidy by our president: “Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an
Election and Destroy a Presidency,” by Andrew McCarthy; “The Plot Against the
President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest
Political Scandal in U.S. History,” by Lee Smith; “Witch Hunt: The Story of the
Greatest Mass Delusion in American Political History,” by Gregg Jarrett; and,
not least, “Resistance (At All Costs): How Trump Haters Are Breaking America”
by Kimberly Strassel. Also, “Intel Community Blog Founder Admits Nunes Was
Right About Spygate From the Beginning,” by Tristan Justice.
Taking
just the titles, consider the harm done to America’s collective respect for the
political, intelligence, law enforcement and media institutions that pretty
much held hands to implement (or looked away from) the ultimately failed
attempt to prevent Donald Trump’s election. They’ve now done all they could to
effect Trump’s removal before voters can reelect him. Make no mistake, it’s a
war in all but the organization and leadership of military violence. A truce
starts with the left simply accepting elections.
How
can any member of the national media not hang their heads in shame over, if
nothing else, the character assassination and disgrace heaped on the Covington
Catholic School kids who had a Native American drummer get in their faces? They
were shown to have done nothing wrong but were unjustifiably pilloried, mocked,
condemned and threatened. Shame on all who fabricated the narrative of smirking
MAGA-hat wearing, aggressive racists (look up “The Media’s Worst Moments of
2019,” Powerlineblog.com).
How
about the outrage against “racist” Trump supporters that supposedly attacked
Jussie Smollett in Chicago? It turned out to be, like most hate crimes, a hoax.
They still haven’t accepted the Mueller Report’s exoneration of President
Trump; they refuse to accept the potentially criminal misuse of FISA warrants
to “spy on” and “wiretap” the Trump campaign through lies about Carter Page. We
now, or will soon, know—when Prosecutor Durham rolls out his indictments—who
are the perps and their accomplices.
I’m
really not picking on the ignorant young climate crusader, Greta Thunberg, who
said: “Even at 1 degree of warming we are seeing an unacceptable loss of life
and livelihoods.” A chart, “Deaths from Climate and non-Climate Catastrophes,
1920-2017,” (British disaster database) shows “climate deaths” declining from
almost a half a million a year to about 25,000; that’s fewer than
non-climate-related deaths.
Finally,
I must correct writing back a while that President G. W. Bush was “impeached.”
Also, a DN obituary writer listed the birth year for someone as “1642.” Folks
probably excused both mistakes.
No comments:
Post a Comment