THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 11/27/2018
Obsessing
over climate, migrants
Spectacles
that consumed the public’s attention (or at least the news media’s idea of what
the public cares about) included the “Fourth National Climate Assessment,” or
NCA for short, and the mobs of migrants attempting to breach the sovereign
border of the United States at San Ysidro. We were lectured over future
calamities if we don’t “address” the “issue” of human-caused global warming/climate
change. The scary-image news crowd also provided us with videos of tear gassing
from the clash with Border Patrol officers.
Some
thoughts: Human-caused (or anthropogenic) global warming—now apparently including
any meteorological inconvenience or catastrophe—has been a never-ending source
of mostly futuristic projections tied to current/recent phenomena. People overwhelmingly
put it near the bottom of issues they feel are important, mostly because they
probably conclude that weather has been with us forever and inclement weather
is to be expected. What has changed has been the ability of news media to make
local or regional bad weather into a national story.
Likewise,
with our catastrophic fires. They can be caused by power line malfunctions, overgrown
forest fuel and homes built with non-fire-resistant materials—placed in
proximity to each other—that would, in normal conditions, pose no fire threat.
The global warming advocates and alarmists care not for the details of
contributory factors when they can regale the public with frightening scenarios
supporting their go-to solution of more government control and higher (carbon,
in this case) taxes.
If you thought that inquisitive journalists
would do research and inform us of the history of environmental predictions
that have proven inaccurate, or even completely wrong, you’d be in error. Read “A
quick refresher course to remind us of previous global warming/cooling scares”
by Jack Heliner. Read the headlines, over 120 years, of dozens of alarms of catastrophic
warming and coming ice ages. Be afraid now.
You
would also be mistaken to think they would dig into the climate report data to
discover any contradictions. For instance, the infamous “hockey stick,”—a graph
with a sharp upturn to supposedly show the radical warming of recent decades—was
promoted in Al Gore’s movie warning everyone about catastrophes to come. Penn
State Professor Mann, who created the graph, has never provided the entirety of his data for the essential role of "peer review," necessary to prove or disprove inaccuracies.
British
climatologist Phil Jones, of East Anglia’s climate research unit, had to admit
that the Medieval Warming Period was warmer than current times and was a world-wide
occurrence. Authorities have had to admit that the actual UN reports don’t directly
support the summaries provided to the media and political consumers. They are
given the talking points and narratives supportive of government efforts and
anti-carbon solutions preferred by the alarmist partisans. I have dozens of
articles and hundreds of pages supporting the non-alarmist and realistic approach
to conflicting data.
Endless
record highs? Not true. Those regular pronouncements rely on ground sensors
that 1) have hot streets, parking lots and large building air conditioning
built up nearby, and 2) have had numerous adjustments made downward for earlier
readings that make current temps appear higher. Moreover, I’ve seen where the “margin
of error” is larger than the actual increase from prior readings, making it all
unreliable.
A
graph derived from https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/,
NOAA’s Climate At A Glance, shows an unremarkable trend over nearly 30 years.
When the current temperature is placed along a straight line going back to
1989, and compared to the rolling 2-year average and all four National Climate
Assessments, a curious pattern is evident. The 1990 average is a tiny fraction
of a degree below now; the average goes down, up, down and up until the 1st NCA
in 2000—at which point the average is almost exactly the same as now.
When
the 2nd NCA came out in 2009, the average had been below current
temperatures continuously, and almost a whole degree lower than now. The
average then went up to the current level and back down for the 3rd
NCA. For the current, 4th NCA (you better be sitting down), the
average global temperature went up slightly before falling back to the current
NOAA-derived yearly level.
So,
the global average was at or below the current temperature from 1990, through 2000,
2009, and 2014, and now, 2018. It went up slightly for the last few years before
returning to the current level. What is the basis for the hysteria, the
doom-and-gloom, the sky-is-falling projections? There has been no net change
for almost 30 years. Neither tornados, nor hurricanes, nor rainfall, nor
blizzards have increased.
The
Camp conflagration had a similar cause as one that killed 500 in Minnesota a
century ago: then there was tinder dry slash left on the forest floor ignited
by sparks from a passing locomotive; now we had dry fuel built up over decades
ignited by sparks from a PG&E utility transformer. Clear and thin the
forests!
On
the migrant confrontation: Yes, separated children and tear gassed crowds are
disturbing—just as they were under Barack Obama’s policies. Don’t throw rocks;
you won’t get tear gassed. Outraged partisans in the media and political class didn’t
condemn Obama—it’s only Trump that they hate; it’s only America that they wish
ill upon. The political and cultural elite simply prefer to import the third
world.
American
reporters won’t tell you about the preponderance of military-age single men or the
source of the millions of dollars of support. They seem disinterested in the
hard-core socialist, anti-American agenda behind “Pueblo Sin Fronteras,” (People
without borders) and other hard left, pro-Chavista (as in the Venezuelan dictator)
groups. However, Univision and other Spanish outlets did report about such
things, as well as the criminals and Bangladeshis among the Central Americans.
See:
“Media Tells Us Border Patrol are Bad Guys For Not Letting Illegals Force Way
Into U.S.” by Nina Bookout; “Examining the Migrant Horde-Pt 2—The Power Behind
the Horde” by Bill Reader; and “Anybody hearing about just how far left the
caravan organizers are?” by Monica Showalter.
No comments:
Post a Comment