THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 3/08/2016
Rational Immigration Law Renewal
It appears that what I consider to be common sense
regarding the replacement of Mr. Allen for education supervisor is likely to
occur: The voters had their say in an open election in which Allen’s
qualifications were fraudulently overstated, to the point of disqualification
from holding the office. At the very least, had the voters been fully informed
of the facts, they would most certainly have chosen Harley North outright,
rather than as a close also-ran.
Last summer’s columns provided many weeks worth of
valid, well-researched and supportable analysis of the deleterious role of
illegal immigration on America’s economy and national and state budgets. Even
the arguably laudable legal immigration system was shown to have a depressing
affect on wages for workers in numerous sectors. The impact on electoral
representation was meticulously presented and even used the words of Democrat
officeholders to prove that Democrats expect, and rely on, immigrants to win
national and local elections.
Local, you ask? Witness the latest effort to turn
non-citizens into voters in New York City, where an estimated 1.3 million
reside. Yes, “New York values” apparently extend to allowing and encouraging
non-citizen voting in municipal elections. Unions are hell-bent-to-leather to
turn millions of foreign-born, legal permanent residents (LPRs or Green Card
holders) into voting citizens by November, in a thinly veiled play for
newly-minted Democrat voters.
I applaud columnist Susan Stamper Brown for writing,
and the editor for printing, last Saturday’s “For Democrats, immigration is
about winning elections.” A highlighted segment went, “To the left, it seems
immigration is nothing more than a game, and illegal immigrants are the pawns
they use to manipulate the system to win elections.” There is no driving legal
guideline that supports an allocation of 40 percent to legal immigrants from
Mexico and Central America. It is observable that they come from authoritarian
political cultures that place relatively little value on our Bill of Rights or
other rules of American self-governance.
The current Republican front-runner is Mr. Donald
Trump, whose “bonafides” in the minds of many supporters include a hard line
approach to immigration—particularly a “deportation-centered” policy for the
estimated 15 million or so illegals. His promise of having a wall built with
Mexican money has drawn cheers and jeers.
I say that simply placing a sizable transfer fee on
all of the money sent by Mexican nationals in America to their southern
relatives would easily do it. Were Trump, or any Republican, to accomplish that
feat, they would be applauded by most Americans, their children and their
children’s children for having protected America’s border, abundance and
political freedom from alien, malign influences, and from budgetary benefit
drains in perpetuity.
Then we find that Trump has expressed “flexibility”
on immigration issues. It turns out that his Mar-a-Lago Club resort was staffed
with only 17 American citizens, out of hundreds of openings that went to
foreigners. It turns out that he was fined for employing illegal aliens in the
building of Trump Tower. Now we find that “Trump Tower was Funded by Rich
Chinese Who Invest Cash for Visas,” (Bloomberg.com, Jesse Drucker).
Here is my offered solution: Whereas Americans and America's legal
immigrants have no justifiable faith that our immigration laws are being
faithfully enforced without preferences, the following is a common sense
proposal to reinforce and renew said laws:
All who have either entered, or remain in, America illegally are
subject to deportation without notice upon contact with law enforcement at any
level. To that end, all law enforcement officers at federal, state or local
levels are deputized to inquire of any person contacted whether they reside
here legally—all other laws, regulations or court decisions notwithstanding.
All who are illegally present in America and who have committed
any violation of law, minor traffic citations excepted, have no legal or
judicial recourse against immediate deportation. Said deportation shall be
enforced upon serving prison sentences with no allowance for probation or
parole.
Upon registration with federal authorities, illegal residents who
have no criminal violations beyond minor traffic citations can, by admitting
and agreeing to the above, be allowed no longer than 2 years to leave America.
Illegal residents not complying with said registration will be subject to
immediate deportation upon contact with any officer of the law. Registered
illegal residents waive any legal recourse to protest 1) their 2-year reprieve
from deportation and 2) their immediate deportation upon violation of any law
beyond traffic citations.
Illegal residents who are otherwise law-abiding may apply for
legal permanent resident status (LPR/"green card"), during the
balance of their 2-year reprieve; however, said reprieve shall not be extended.
Illegal residents qualifying for reprieve may, upon authorization by Congress,
receive $2000 per family member for the purpose of relocation to their
country-of-origin; those eligible for relocation funds waive any legal rights
against the removal and relocation process and must pursue their LPR card from
abroad.
The above proposals can 1)
restore the faith that Americans deserve to have in immigration law enforcement
and 2) become a transition to a "zero tolerance" atmosphere for
illegal entrants, visa over-stayers and unauthorized workers. Future immigrants
will likewise arrive with the knowledge that America's laws are not suggestions
and will not be set aside out of sympathy for their plight, beyond the extent
that the people's representatives enshrine it in lawful immigration policies. Also, they will not be
allowed to vote for at least 25 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment