THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 11/11/2014
Great veterans; fine election
It would be more-than-appropriate for all public
meetings to ask veterans to stand so that those seated can see vets who gave
some (and know that some gave all) who have secured this nation as a beacon of
freedom and an example to the nations of the world. We can all thank any
veteran that we know or see, and say a prayer of thanks for those who’ve made
the ultimate sacrifice. Whether sitting in a cockpit or in a cramped position
maintaining that same aircraft; whether slogging through mud, dust, sweltering
heat or bone-chilling cold as a Marine (Happy 239th Birthday) or a
soldier, or in supply, logistics, staff or intell; whether at battle stations
or regular duty on a warship, carrier, tender or submarine; and those who have
served in the Coast Guard protecting America’s shores and going into harms way
to save souls in distress—all services are honored and honorable.
Regarding last Tuesday’s election, one could respond
with a variation of “neener, neener, told you so”; it would far better serve
our collective understanding to favor honest and insightful observations.
Locally, it does not appear that our conservative-minded Supervisors will veer
from their course of fiscal responsibility and common sense. The newest
Supervisor, Ms. Carlson, will have ample opportunity to demonstrate similar
judicious qualities before her next election.
California’s Republican Party, apparatus and
fundraising wisely focused on winnable races. The slight wavelet in the Golden
State secured several seats in Sacramento; Democrats won’t have supermajority
status with which to indulge every wacky policy inclination and pay zero heed
to minority Republicans. As I wrote last week, our side may be able to help
forestall “the fanatical anti-business, anti-resource use, pro-public employee
union, pro-tax and pro-regulatory path” of the leftist progressives that run
that town.
According to electionprojection.com, while Democrat
Aguilar added a blue seat to California’s House delegation (CA-31), Republican
Ose has won in CA-7 (R pick up) and Republican Tacherra (CA-16) is ahead in his
race. Then, there’s Arizona’s close race between Republican retired Air Force
Col. Martha McSally and Democrat Barber (R ahead by 341 ballots; D shenanigans
over provisional ballots in Pima Co. may steal it yet). Combined with 2 House
races in Louisiana that go to runoffs (and Republican wins) in December,
Republicans may gain +17 net; 249 would be their highest since 1929.
Now, those numbers don’t begin to tell the full story
that I predicted last week, “a Republican landslide (and) the American
electorate’s repudiation of Obama-ism.” Democrat excuses and rationalizations
fall flat: Obama condescendingly dismissing the results because “two-thirds
didn’t vote”; Democrats hypocritically complaining about “Koch brothers’
money”; disingenuous fairy tales about “voter suppression”; and whining about
“Fox News” and talk radio. None of those refute the wholesale route of
Democrats from Governors’ offices and state legislative bodies totaling up to
twice as many now run by Republicans. That should hopefully diminish the hopes
for Democrat gains going forward as their state farm teams and candidate
benches are reduced to lesser-known players.
The titles of analytical pieces: “Midterms ‘A Nuclear
Explosion,’ The Worst Wall-To-Wall Shellacking You Will Ever See” (C.
Krauthammer), “The Democrats Waterloo” (V.D. Hansen) and “The Biggest Loser”
(Matthew Continetti). That “Loser”? Hillary Clinton: “Hillary must convince
Democrats that their savior is a grandmother who lives in a mansion on
Massachusetts Avenue…She will have to run against an energetic and motivated
Republican party.” “In many ways, she was the big loser on Tuesday because she
embodies everything that’s wrong with Washington” (WI Gov. Scott Walker).
That’s just for a start. The electorate looks forward
rather than backward; nobody under the age of 40 is going to have personally
fond memories of Bill Clinton’s Presidency. Nothing about Joe Biden, Nancy
Pelosi, Harry Reid or any other liberal dinosaurs inspires youthful
optimism—the stables of liberal/progressive policy bromides are invariably
reheated collectivist schemes from the past.
They’ve had their time to shine and the economy is the
most pathetic recovery since the Great Depression; Obamacare is a rolling
circus of deception, manipulation, failing promises and bloated expenses for
the number of people actually served. Once the most offensive of elements are
removed (or full repeal), it will wither as free market and state-based health
care/insurance options are signed into place by a Republican president.
In helping to explain Obama’s political repulsiveness
(my term, not his), Peter Berkowitz wrote, in “The Poverty of Obama’s
Pragmatism,” that “Obama is, after all, an ideologue. He seeks radically to
transform America both at home and in its role abroad. When Obama seeks to
redistribute income and to lessen America’s footprint in world affairs” it’s
following an ideological vision devoid of “an empirical analysis of what course
of action will work best in the real world.”
Can you say “Divided Electorate”? Republicans see
America going in wrong direction, the economy not good, climate change not important
and a worse-off next generation. Dems take the opposite positions. I say, “We
win, they lose” as Reagan once said of communism.
No comments:
Post a Comment