THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 10/22/2013
After action post script on shutdown theater
We might have scrimped, saved and planned for a
memorable, once-in-a-lifetime guided float trip down the Colorado River, like Barbara’s
mom did many years ago. We might have shown up to meet the rafting company
vans, ready to move rafts and supplies to water for a few days in the Grand
Canyon, only to be brusquely turned away by federal park rangers “shutting
down” river access. It really happened to some folks.
We could have bought a dream home, and been the
retired couple, Ralph and Joyce Spencer, 77 and 80 years of age, “who were
evicted from their home on Lake Mead in Nevada by an officious park ranger who
told them they had 24 hours to vacate the premises. The Spencers own their home
outright, but it sits on land leased from the federal government …” with a
legally binding contract that the feds have no legitimate reason to violate
(“Vindictive Shutdown Theater,” National Review). Locally, I would have liked
to drive to the boat ramp area of the Recreation Area and hike over to the
pond, but couldn’t hike there from outside the closed gate. I hope others,
physically more capable than I, made use of our collectively owned land without
interference.
In “Seniors Held Under Armed Guard at Yellowstone
National Park,” NRO writer Sterling Beard conveyed the brutish indignities
inflicted on a group of tourists: held for hours, not allowed to photograph a
herd of bison, visit privately owned shops or even bathrooms at those shops, as
their bus departed the park. Stated privately-owned-and-staffed Claude Moore
Colonial Farm director, Anna Eberly, “I have never worked with a more
arrogant, arbitrary and vindictive group representing the NPS (who shut their parking lot).”
The partial government shutdown should motivate Americans to divest the federal government of its land, facilities, agencies and powers,
since they willingly punish and deprive Americans. In “HOPEY-CHANGEY: How
Federal Workers Became Obama’s Private Army,” we can see that “the
civil-service system has been exposed as a failure—at least in this
administration. Instead of an independent workforce of professionals who
implement federal regulation in an even-handed and competent manner, we have
returned to the era of partisan retribution and politically-motivated
malevolence … It’s part of a disturbing pattern emerging in the second term of
Barack Obama … the risks of larger government and regulatory overreach go far
beyond incompetence.”
Weeks worth of shutdown and debt ceiling reporting in
the Daily News showed that news reporting in general, the Associated Press in
particular, function as either stenographers for, or devoted advocates of, the
Obama/Democrat narrative. Cartoons performed the hack job of positing phony
beliefs to Senators Mike Lee and Ted Cruz (“We hate government”) and one-sided
ridicule of Tea Party Republicans for the shutdown; the AP articles
reflected network news blame-placing.
Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner: “Republicans never
expected to get a fair shake in the Big Three networks’ coverage of the 16-day
government shutdown, but the final tally … is stunning: 41 stories blamed
Republicans and zero blamed Democrats … another 17 blamed both sides. The
broadcast networks invariably blamed Republicans (highlighting victimized
Americans and federal workers) even as they ignored examples of how the Obama
administration and Senate Democrats were working to make the shutdown as
painful as possible.”
The debt ceiling itself was misreported as default on
debts by the AP, networks, most cable shows and, ultimately, by President Obama
and his mouthpieces. However, nearly $200 billion goes into the Treasury Dept
monthly; less than $20 billion must service our $17 trillion debt. By law, the
President and his administration are required to allocate money to make debt
payments rather than default. However, Obama predictably might feign
powerlessness and rely on the Democrat/media complex to point blame at
Republicans. Despicable, but true. In the last 2 years, America’s debt has
increased $2.4 trillion while our GDP (value of all goods and services in
America) has increased less than $1.2 trillion. Isn’t there something horribly
wrong with our federal finances that our governmental/economic world would
crash and burn if spending was limited to income?
In September, a Reason-Rupe poll found “70 percent of
Americans oppose raising the debt ceiling … (and) 55 percent say they do not
support raising it even if it causes the U.S. to default on its debt.” Most
feel government spends too much money, wastes 60 percent of it, and that
Congress “passes too many laws” and the “wrong kind of laws.” Sounds pretty Tea
Party-ish to me. CBS found blame going to Republicans more than Obama/Democrats
by 4 to 3; however, 75 percent saw “negotiations as the way out.” Obama and
Harry Reid alone said “NO” to negotiations in a conference committee;
Republicans made many compromises--the blame lies with the Democrats,
period.
Then there’s last Thursday’s Daily News chart of an
AP-GfK poll of “Adults” that found “The tea party movement” less responsible
for the shutdown than Leader Harry Reid, Barack Obama, Congressional Democrats,
Speaker Boehner or Congressional Republicans. Look up (or read at
DonPolson.blogspot.com) “Morici: Obama Victory Based on ‘Deception and
Demagoguery,’” “Barack Obama has won the shutdown; His prize is a lame duck
presidency” (by Tim Stanley), and “Why the Shutdown is a Republican Victory” by
liberal Peter Beinart of The Daily Beast.
No comments:
Post a Comment