THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 3/19/2019
Meet Tehama County Republican
Women
This
Thursday, March 21, anyone wanting to either find ways to help the Republican
Party in our fair county, or meet some of the local women that dedicate their
time to that cause, can simply show up at The Enjoy Store, at 615 Main Street, 5:30 to 7:30 PM. The Enjoy Store is on the west side of Main Street in the first
block north of Oak, a few doors up from the Re/Max office.
A
free “coffee lovers” basket will be given away to one person out of those who
sign up to enter. It will be a great opportunity to share camaraderie among
fellow conservative women, as well as find out what local events they support:
the Republican booth at the fairgrounds this May, the table at the Olive
Festival in Corning, and others that allow Tehama County residents to mingle,
collect flyers and share thoughts, concerns and support for our candidates and
issues. You’ll be welcomed into a cheery, vibrant group.
What
I see in the New Zealand terroristic mass murder of Muslims: It is particularly
tragic at a time when religious tension among the major faith denominations is
as high as most people can remember. There are founded and unfounded rumors,
plots and animosities—tempered by good-hearted spiritual sharing of best wishes
among Christian, Jewish and Muslim leaders. Expressions of violence and
intolerance are spread among the fanatical in all faiths; let’s not dwell over
who’s most at fault.
I
see an overwhelming desire to “live and let live,” or worship and let worship. A
minority of any religion’s adherents, wishing evil upon another faith’s
followers, don’t represent the majority of any faith. Allowing past
atrocities—the historical quantity of aggressions by Muslims against
Christians, Hindus against Muslims, or any group against Jews (or vice versa
for the above)—to limit current tolerance and warm intentions is to be caught
in the past.
What
is disappointing, even despicable, is how such violence is used for partisan,
ideological warfare. At a time when logical, dispassionate analysis and common
decency should temper judgements and conclusions, the talking points and buzz
words of insincere finger-pointing prevail. In the New Zealand mass murder, the
news media seized on “right wing” and “white nationalist” terms to engage in
what I see as preemptive efforts to define, even stop, any further debate. Once
the perpetrators are so labelled, Trump and his supporters must answer
one-sided accusations, absent any evidence of racism. Charlottesville, redux.
The
names of, and “manifestos” by, psychopathic mass murderers should be given no
publicity. Their self-described causes count for less-than-nothing. It can,
however, inform our understanding of the psychology of terrorism to examine the
delusional, as well as the rational. Critics of that statement would do well to
remember how we were endlessly told to acknowledge the “root causes” for Al
Qaeda and Muslim fanatics: Crusades, colonialism and resource appropriation
were lifted from their statements. Democrats like Sen. Patty Murray defended Osama
bin Laden’s good deeds.
Islamic
terrorist justification served the larger anti-Western cause of the progressive
left. “We have to understand” the angst, pain and injustice that drove, not
just the poor downtrodden masses to hate us, but also doctors, lawyers or other
accomplished Muslim fanatics to bomb us. Well, the New Zealand murderer
likewise had what to him were rational complaints among his insane, irrational
motivations. You wouldn’t know that from the media herd that—before bodies were
cold or blood dried—found their collective voice in a “gotcha” question by an
ABC reporter to President Trump about “white nationalism.”
It
didn’t matter what Trump said. Really, it didn’t because it was going to be
interpreted and spun into the media’s chosen “Trump’s a racist, this we know”
narrative; the one-time “need to understand the terrorist” is an inoperative,
even retrograde approach. You see, it was a sign of Barack Obama’s
sophistication and far-sightedness when he dismissed America’s “exceptionalism”
because the Greeks and British certainly felt exceptional. Only hypocrisy explains
criticism of President Trump for touting American “nationalism” while he
encourages other countries to pursue their best “national” interests. The
media/Democrat cabal attaching “white” to “nationalism” without one single use
of the term by Trump, proves nothing beyond the disingenuousness of the
accusers.
While
media Democrats-with-bylines reduce the NZ terrorist to “white
supremacist/nationalist” for the crass, phony purpose of besmirching Trump and
his supporters, the terrorist’s excuses/complaints/beliefs portray very mixed
motivations—while still falling far short of justifiable causes. From
“Radicalization & Degeneration,” by Ron Dreher at The American
Conservative, you can gain an accurate picture of the man’s self-description:
He
“identifies himself as an ‘ethno-nationalist eco-fascist.’ He says he was first
a communist, then an anarchist, then a libertarian, and finally an eco-fascist.
He’s 28. This is not a stable person. He despises conservatives for having
conserved nothing…’corporatism in disguise’…despises France’s [right wing]
National Front…praises the emergence of Trump as a sign of hope, but mocks Trump
too. His ideal leader is Oswald Mosley, the 20th century British
fascist. Point is, the idea that (he) has any meaningful connection to the
mainstream right is nonsense. The man is a true radical.”
He
wants to frighten people and create conflict, cause the US to take away guns,
causing gun owners to become violent; wants the US to be balkanized into
warring factions, destroying American projection of power; he’s emotionally
distraught over the numbers and crime of European Muslim immigrants, as well as
the dying, dispirited native people. A national socialist, he hates capitalism,
loves the environment and praises the People’s Republic of China as his ideal
state.
His
radicalism is driven by “Degeneration”: declining and disempowered European
people (and in America), widespread drug use, environmental degradation, the
collapse of Christianity and rampant hedonism. Many are likewise disheartened
by much of the above but choose engagement, not violence, to advance their
goals, which are undeserving of demonization just because a psychopath kills
people.
No comments:
Post a Comment