THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 1/15/2019
Border
follies, facts and fencing
Witness
our supposedly neutral, objective news media. The current dispute over
America’s inconsistently guarded southern border—and the undeniable crisis
associated with illegal entry, human trafficking, drug smuggling and terrorist
threat—shows how so many of our news providers substitute partisan judgment for
a factual search, “the whole truth.” Such judgments skew which stories, data,
audio and video are provided to us.
Start
with “The Top Fake News Stories of 2018,” put together by The Daily Caller’s
Amber Athey. Of the 30 or so entries, 6 involved illegal immigration and our
border. “The associated Press published a report in June about abuse of child
immigrants in the U.S., but did its best to bury the fact that the abuse
primarily occurred under the Obama administration.”
President Trump’s
“zero-tolerance” policy was mentioned prominently numerous times; AP only noted
in the 20th paragraph that the abuse began in 2016, never naming Obama.
“Several
reporters claimed during the uproar over President Donald Trump’s family
separations at the border that President Barack Obama never separated
families.” This was completely wrong; even former Obama officials admitted that
separations occurred.
“The
Daily Beast claimed that there is ‘zero evidence’ that members of the migrant
caravan were bringing HIV and TB into the United States.” This was refuted by
the Tijuana Health Department’s reporting of tuberculosis, HIV and chickenpox
among the caravan. Baja California officials disputed the tuberculosis but
confirmed the presence of HIV and chickenpox.
In
perhaps the most egregious visual misrepresentation, Time Magazine merged a
photo of Trump supposedly looking down on a crying Honduran child to advance
the narrative of family separations at the border. The child’s image was
clipped from another photo and divorced from the facts that “the mother and her
child were not fleeing violence, and the mother had been previously deported
from the U.S…and had left three other children in Honduras while paying a
smuggler to get her across the border illegally.”
The
Washington Post duplicitously tried to assign blame for the death of a
7-year-old migrant child from Guatemala on the Border Patrol in December.
“Despite WaPo’s misleading headline [that suggested Border Patrol culpability],
the full timeline of events and statements from the girl’s father praising
border agents revealed a different story.”
In
what has become a pattern of odious misreporting from CNN’s Jim Acosta, he argued
with President Trump that “illegal immigrants would ‘not be’ trying to climb
over the U.S.-Mexico border wall.” It was his obnoxious way of questioning the
reinforcement of Border Patrol officers; within a week, migrants were indeed climbing
over border fencing. This same sorry excuse for a reporter just last week embarrassed
himself by trying to “prove” the ineffectiveness of Trump’s proposed border
wall by standing next to a section of structural steel “bollard-type” barrier
in Texas.
With
camera rolling, Acosta snidely pointed out that there were no visible threats
to America’s border or citizens—oblivious that he was proving the efficacy of a
nearly insurmountable barrier. In interviews with the Border Patrol in charge
of that sector, Sean Hannity found that the areas with those barriers accounted
for a tiny fraction (around 5 percent) of the intrusions; the rest occurring
where no such barriers existed.
So,
President Trump addressed the nation last week, producing a plethora of
rebuttals and so-called “fact-checks” (in reality, opinion and spin presented
as objective analysis) by some of the same outlets that committed the gross
errors listed above. They went so far as to formulate “pre-buttals” and brag of
“eating Wheaties” to fortify themselves for the task of ferreting out Trump’s
lies. Trump made no errors.
In
contrast: 1) News sources attempted to refute the “terrorism” coming through
the border—drugs are a part of the terrorist strategy. Hezbollah uses its
resources to smuggle drugs, which kill Americans, and uses the proceeds to
further actual terrorism. Many non-Central Americans are apprehended; we don’t
know if they have terrorist ties until they’re investigated.
2)
They shamelessly tried to dismiss the idea that we have a crisis at the
southern border; it’s an obvious crisis when unaccompanied children and
families arrive in the tens of thousands and overwhelm detention facilities. 3)
News media voices tried to dismiss the violence and criminality by illegal
aliens; while the federal prisons incarcerate non-citizens, any thorough
analysis has found that, while legal immigrants offend at low levels, illegals
have vastly higher crime rates than all others. Texas found almost 240,000
convictions in their state prisons involving illegal aliens; Texas has less
than 10 percent of America’s population. Do the math.
Here
are a couple of useful sources: “January 2019: When media fact-checkers finally
jumped the shark,” by Larry O’Connor. The obsession with trying to “prove”
Trump’s lies has led the media to forget they had little interest in the
veracity of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, easily proven to be “congenital
liars.” Mollie Hemmingway’s exhaustive piece, “Media’s Angry Response To
President Trump’s Oval Office Speech Comes Up Short” showed Democrats and media
mimicking each other over “facts, not fear.”
“Trump
spoke about the American people. He made it plain that he is working to benefit
them, especially those in the front lines of dealing with the harm wrought by
people who ought never to have been here in the first place. Pelosi and Schumer
spoke about Trump. Their hatred was manifest and could cause people to wonder
whether they’re working for the good of Americans or simply to import voters…drugs
and violence.” (Bookwormroom.com)
“Democrats
Can Fund the World, but Not the Wall” (Brian C. Joondeph), says it all. Consider
the most effective defensive walls in existence: the Israeli-built walls have
stopped around 98 percent of deaths (457 in 2002; 8 in 2009) at the hands of
Palestinians; the Great Wall of China has protected that nation for thousands
of years.
No comments:
Post a Comment