THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 9/20//2016
Which path? Liberty or equality
The Republican Central Committee and volunteers hope
to get to meet you at our fair booth in the commercial building, and share our
enthusiasm and hope for electoral victories in 7 weeks. There will be flyers,
bumper stickers and camaraderie for all. Hope to see ya then.
As I wrote this in early July prior to traveling, I
found a 2-year-old item that is still relevant to issues at stake in this
election. “The Idol of Equality” by Victor Davis Hanson, is on the Internet
(enter title and author, use NationalReview.com). It is subtitled “To put
equality ahead of liberty is to war against human nature.” It should be
self-evident; however, many are sadly becoming confused by the pandering and
sloganeering of “equality” ideologues.
Alexis de Tocqueville, a French traveler in, observer
of, and writer about, a relatively newborn America in the early 1800s had this
to say: “There is, in fact, a manly and lawful passion for equality which
excites men to wish all to be powerful and honored. This passion tends to
elevate the humble to the rank of the great; but there exists also in the human
heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower
the powerful to their own level, and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery
to inequality with freedom.”
The terms, “manly…men,” shouldn’t detract from the
timeless sentiments. It’s laudable to aspire to betterment, comfort, wealth and
position; and for removing impediments to such aspirations. It is, on the other
hand, a disreputable desire or policy to look upon those who’ve achieved and
have possessions, wealth or influence—even those on the way—and accuse them of
malintent, dishonor, injustice or undue privilege, all to de-legitimize
achievement.
Even worse is to empower the state—using the mob
mentality of manipulated public opinion—to punish achievers via taxation, seize
their wealth, and transfer it to other groups or people. It’s disappointing
when that sentiment is a major motivation in one of America’s major political
parties. The Democrats are obsessed with raising taxes on “the rich,” while
concocting more spending giveaways, and growing existing benefit programs.
Large pluralities of Democrats supported a
self-admitted “democratic socialist,” Bernie Sanders. This occurred while the
latest experiment in socialism, Venezuela, descends into the kind of chaos and
barbarity that inevitably follows misguided attempts to socialize a nation with
“equality” for all. As an oil-rich country, with abundant fertile land,
Venezuela’s energy lags its needs, food shelves are bare while riots and
thievery overwhelm shipments, medical care is subhuman, and they can’t afford
to print money.
Hanson: “The present war against personal liberty in
service to mandated equality may become the greatest danger of the 21st
century. The theaters of battle already extend to every segment of American
life; and every weapon is employed, from government coercion to the media to
the Orwellian effort to change the meaning of language.
“Millions of Americans have lost the liberty to select
their own type of health insurance, purchased on their own volition to best
match their own assessments of their particular needs. Obamacare—the federal
government’s redistributive effort to equalize health care for all—sought to
destroy the liberty of many millions in order to ensure state-directed sameness
in care for all.”
What was foreseen, by many analysts and conservative
advocates of free market health care, has occurred: So-called “death spirals”
for companies that have been induced by legally mandated guaranteed
signups—together with “must issue” for pre-existing conditions. That produced
higher-than-expected costs with no reimbursement from taxpayer pockets as
originally proposed. Result? Obama can’t force businesses to operate at losses
exceeding a billion dollars; they exit the insurance exchanges, abandoning
Obamacare to wither and slide into collapse.
VDH: “The effort to take away freedom, both violent
and insidious, in order to ensure equality of result has a sad history…(to wit
the French Revolution, the Sovietization of Eastern Europe, socialization of
African and Latin American nations, the European Union, etc.)
“The problem with destroying liberty in service to
mandated sameness is obvious: It has never worked, because it is contrary to
human nature…forced equality erodes personal initiative, undermines the rule of
law, ruins the honesty of language, and requires a degree of coercion
antithetical to a free society.”
Remember that the progressive elite, the governing
class and favored crony capitalists will always set themselves above the ruled;
they will have a vested interest in promoting the philosophy of “equality” as a
means of eliminating competition for the excessive benefits they award
themselves. Just like the Obamas, their children will be admitted into elite
schools, universities, and then on to boardrooms, private jets, private golf
courses, gated wealthy neighborhoods, and on and on. The richest counties in
America surround Washington, D.C.
State mandated (and attempted) equality produces 1)
humans fleeing from it, as was seen in the U.S.S.R, Eastern Europe, France,
Detroit and California, 2) governing by mandates and executive fiats which
comes from 3) the selective enforcement of settled law and 4) appointees chosen
on the basis of progressive ideology rather than proven competence and
expertise.
This is all intended to help the poor; however “free
people usually create more wealth than the coerced, which makes the lower
echelons better off.” Liberty enables those same lower classes to lift
themselves into higher incomes through their own initiative and abilities.
Americans must choose liberty over equality to survive as the world’s beacon of
freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment