THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 1/19/2016
America’s Deceiver-In-Chief
I’d like to invite you to a “meet and greet” with
Republican Duf Sundheim, candidate for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by
Barbara Boxer. He will be at the Hampton Inn & Suites, in the Roundup Room,
this afternoon from 1:30 to 4:30. The Tehama County Republican Women Federated
hosts Mr. Sundheim’s visit and will have some light refreshments.
I found this writer’s take on the debates to be pretty
close to the mark: “As bad as our guys are, the Gang of Three is shockingly
bad. Bernie is giving HRC a run? Who can imagine listening to him on a regular
basis? This is a measure of how weak she is, and if she gets indicted or
otherwise falls, the adults (and the Dems in Congress) will surely seek a way
to open the convention and nominate Kerry or Biden. It is dangerous for the
country to have such fools as the binary choices—yes, some of our guys are
trouble, but none of our top three is so stupid. It is good for Republicans if
the Dems as a party now require candidates to say stupid things, but it is not
good for the country.”
Now, on the disingenuousness recently emanating from
Emperor Barack Obama. His fatuous town hall, “Guns in America,” hosted by
Anderson Cooper (to his credit, he asked tough questions) saw a litany of lies
from Obama. In case you missed it, Cooper made “an admission against interest”
when he explained that having Obama face citizen questioners served the viewers
better than a press conference. You see, the journalists and reporters
basically “agree with Obama” on the issues. Thanks, Anderson, that explains a
lot.
The NRA, to their credit, “declined the invitation
because it is a White House-orchestrated made-for-TV event and not an
opportunity for a genuine dialogue or an effort to find common ground. We
remain disappointed that the president has chosen to demagogue the issue for
political purposes instead of providing real leadership like working to advance
Rep. Tim Murphy’s bipartisan legislation to address the issue of mental health,
which is the common denominator in mass shootings.”
To a rape survivor who stated her desire to protect
herself and her children, at home or anywhere else, Obama coldly insisted that
she was placing her family in danger just by the presence of a gun. This is
Obama’s alternate reality where a gun somehow fires itself, especially when in
a law-abiding citizen’s home; and the extremely remote possibility that a bad
guy could wrestle away or steal the gun means you’re better off disarmed. What
a lying fool.
“President Obama repeatedly falsely claimed that
people can ‘just go on the Internet and buy whatever weapon they want.’ But he
was never forced to agree that any gun bought from a dealer over the Internet
has to be sent to a local dealer that by law has to perform a background check
before they can transfer the gun.” (Frank Miniter, “Obama gets away with some
whoppers on guns at town hall event,” 1/7/2016)
While whining that “it is fair to call it a conspiracy,”
that people mistakenly think he wants to take their guns away, actions prove
otherwise. He has invoked gun confiscation in Australia as “effective”; he
wants “assault weapons” banned and confiscated (cosmetic appearances aside,
they function the same as any other semi-automatic long gun); he wants seniors’
gun rights abrogated if they fall below some standard of financial hardship.
I assume he is in favor of the LA ban on the
possession of standard-but-relatively-high-capacity hand guns; he’s likely to
support the California proposal to allow anyone to report you as being mentally
unstable without proof as a pretext to confiscate your guns; he has supported
bans on concealed-carry permits; he even opposed gun possession in one’s home
as an Illinois senator.
Someone asked what would be bad about California’s
strictest-in-nation laws, which pass Obama’s proposed muster, applying to all
states. Great! The laws that failed to prevent the San Bernardino massacre
(because the terrorists acquired guns—as most criminals do—via a “straw buyer”
with no criminal record) would fail to stop any other mass shootings.
Meanwhile, law abiding citizens would needlessly have to wait longer than 3
days—for 10 or 14 days—while someone intent on doing them harm with stolen guns
or knives, doesn’t wait for anything.
Obama lied about “smart guns,” saying that “[Smart Gun
technology] has not been developed primarily because it has been blocked by the
NRA” and firearms manufactures. The NRA and the NSSF, among other pro-Second
Amendment groups, “have statements on their websites saying they are not
opposed to ‘smart-gun’ technology. Laws that seek to mandate smart-gun
technology…are what is impeding smart-gun development.” Moreover, the
additional expenses added to the cost of a gun has the perverse effect of
pricing the poorest folks, in the most crime-ridden areas, out of the ability
to defend their families.
Look up “Obama’s Claims About Internet Gun Sales Are
Completely False—And PolitiFact’s defense of his claims indicates again how
little the media understand guns,” (Mollie Hemmingway, Jan. 6,
thefederalist.com). Anderson Cooper: the media “agree with Obama.”
In “Ted Cruz is correct: Eric Holder talked about
brainwashing people about guns” by Moe Lane, a 1996 Holder quote resurfaced.
“We just have to be repetitive about this…We have to do this every day of the
week and just really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly
different way.” Would that include “re-education camps” for “gun nuts”?
No comments:
Post a Comment