THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 12/16/2014
Sexual assault statistics,
reality
If home-made desserts and camaraderie is your thing,
the Tea Party Patriots meeting tonight is devoted to just such
not-quite-calorie-free activity. Hey, just skip dinner and go for the stuff you
normally stingily portion out. December 23rd and 30th
meetings are cancelled.
I’d like to share some Department of Justice data on
frequency of rape and sexual assaults. It goes without saying that any man, or
woman for that matter, that forces themselves on an unwilling victim deserves
serious prison time and a life long stain on his or her reputation. True, these
perpetrators are overwhelmingly male. However, it should not be neglected that
hardly a day goes by without a report showing up at Instapundit
(pjmedia.com/instapundit) describing some phase of the legal process applied to
a female assaulter of a minor boy or girl, either as teachers or some other
figure of authority.
Each entry is preceded by the title, “Teach Women Not
to Rape,” and, before someone starts throwing literary stones my way, they
should spend some time perusing the actual cases and instances. This year, over
300 of those reports involved female teachers somewhere in America, a trend
which reminds me that such criminal assaults were deemed newsworthy, outrageous
and widely condemnable when committed by priests or Boy Scout leaders.
The DOJ statistics cover reported acts of “Completed
Rape,” “Attempted Rape,” “Sexual Assault” and “Threats of Rape or Sexual
Assault.” The so-called epidemic and culture of “rape” and “sexual assault” on
college campuses has been publicized and used to make broad political and
cultural points that many have questioned. By questioned, it is meant that the
widely quoted figure of “one in five” women being assaulted sexually on
campuses in America is doubtful. The now-debunked Rolling Stone story of a
“gang rape” at a University of Virginia fraternity has fit the popular (at
least among the media, academic and cultural left) anti-male theme.
I posted the source article, “New DOJ Data On Sexual
Assaults: College Students Are Actually Less Likely To Be Victimized,” from
thefederalist.com with links to the full DOJ report, on Sunday at
donpolson.blogspot.com. “A new report on sexual assault released today by the
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic
that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault.”
The “Average annual number” and “Rate” is provided at
the “full study” link. The bottom line is that “rape” happens to 6.1 out of
1,000 female students; when you combine all four categories together, culled
from 18 years of crime reports (1995 to 2013), slightly over 12 women out of
1,000 on college campuses are victims per year. To understand how wildly
inflated the “one in five” figure is, just realize that equals 200 women out of
1,000—the real figure, again, is about 12. Even if they meant that in four
years of college, 200 out of 1,000 women are assaulted, that would be 50 per
year per thousand—still over 4 times the actual rate of incidents.
What is even more revealing is that the frequency of
rape and assault on campuses is less than that for “Nonstudent women”; the raw
numbers are twice as high off campus while the frequency is over 15 per 1,000.
No one seems disturbed that women not in college suffer greater from what, also
from DOJ figures, is a crime that has declined dramatically (by about half)
since 1997.
I have also read that many such crimes are committed
by “serial” offenders who have their modus down and, not unlike the accusations
against Bill Cosby, show pathology and methodology. Many occurrences involve
inebriation by one or both parties. In incidents at frat houses, for instance when
an obviously drunk female is observed being led away, the observing “brother”
is reluctant to step in, much less report and provide witness testimony against
an offending fraternity brother.
I’ll not provide critics with a fat target by
lecturing about the evils of alcohol consumption by young women; an inebriated
woman with diminished ability to resist should be treated as a victim of
self-inflicted over-indulgence, not as an opportunity for sexual exploitation.
However, a basic rule for both sexes is that one’s reputation and self-respect
is far easier to sustain with honor than to salvage after lost control and
blacked-out memory leave one open to all manner of indefensible accusations and
perfidy.
It should also be remembered that the inexcusability of
violent rape has been with mankind for all of recorded civilization; so have
the occurrences of false accusations of rape. I find it hypocritical for the
same people and political spectrums that insist on the presumption of innocence
for murder and terrorism suspects, to then say that those accused of sexual
assault are assumed guilty because victims are universally truthful.
My comment on the report on CIA interrogation released
by Senator Diane Feinstein: It is the
most deceitful, slanted, manipulated presentation of non-fact, damaging to
those protecting us from terrorists, in my memory. Since I began this column in
2005, pushing back against the lies and propaganda over this subject has been
no small effort, given the Bush Derangement Syndrome that drove the accusers.
For perspective, read the 7 recent (of 391) posts under the “War on terror”
label at donpolson.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment