The 'Unintended Effects' of Government-Mandated Ethanol
The recent release of a United Nations report on corn ethanol has triggered
new discussions on the benefits and drawbacks of the biofuel.
The report by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated
that while biofuels do release smaller amounts of greenhouse gases than gasoline
or diesel, "for some biofuels indirect emissions — including from land use
change — can lead to greater total emissions than when using petroleum
products."
Moreover, the negative consequences of including corn ethanol in the fuel
supply are enormous.
In 2000, more than 90 percent of the corn grown in the United States went to
feed people and livestock, including many people in undeveloped countries, and
less than 5 percent was used to produce ethanol.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 dictated that gasoline contain a minimum volume
of renewable fuels. By 2013, 40 percent of the corn crop went to produce
ethanol, 45 percent fed livestock, and just 15 percent was used for foods and
beverages, according to a report from Forbes.
On average, one bushel of corn can produce nearly three gallons of ethanol.
This year the United States — which produces 40 percent of the world's corn and
accounts for 70 percent of worldwide corn imports — will use nearly 5 billion
bushels to produce more than 13 billion gallons of ethanol fuel.
The corn needed to fill a 25-gallon gas tank with ethanol could feed one
person for a year, "so the amount of corn used to make that 13 million gallons
will not feed the almost 500 million people it was feeding in 2000. This is the
entire population of the Western Hemisphere outside the United States," observed
Forbes contributor James Conca.
In 2007, the global price of corn doubled due to the increase in ethanol
production, leading to increases in the price of milk, cheese, eggs, meat,
cereals, and corn-based sweeteners, and world grain reserves dwindled to their
lowest level in over 30 years.
Increased corn prices can also impact a surprising array of other products,
including toothpaste, cosmetics, shampoo, and adhesives.
"Additional unintended effects from the increase in ethanol production
include the dramatic rise in land rents," as well as an increase in the natural
gas and chemicals used for fertilizers, over-pumping of aquifers, and
clear-cutting of forests to plant corn crops, Forbes reported.
There have also been reports of vehicles' fuel systems being damaged by the
use of ethanol, Bloomberg Businessweek reported.
As for the rationale to counter all these negative effects, the International
Institute for Sustainable Development has estimated that the CO2 and climate
benefits from replacing petroleum fuels with biofuels like ethanol are
"basically zero."
http://news.newsmax.com/?Z6OvYXfhQOCLuCgLHgNTShgHIQyfbJRAZ&ns_mail_uid=13795880&ns_mail_job=1566641_04272014
No comments:
Post a Comment