The Team of Nitwits: What Does the Military Think?

by Steven Hayward in Obama Foreign Policy, Syria

Civilian control of the U.S. military (a very good thing, needless to say) means they are constricted in what they can say publicly.  But if the views of retired Army major general Robert Scales are accurate, Obama’s fecklessness may represent a new low:

[Serving military officers] are embarrassed to be associated with the amateurism of the Obama administration’s attempts to craft a plan that makes strategic sense. None of the White House staff has any experience in war or understands it. So far, at least, this path to war violates every principle of war, including the element of surprise, achieving mass and having a clearly defined and obtainable objective.
They are repelled by the hypocrisy of a media blitz that warns against the return of Hitlerism but privately acknowledges that the motive for risking American lives is our “responsibility to protect” the world’s innocents. Prospective U.S. action in Syria is not about threats to American security. The U.S. military’s civilian masters privately are proud that they are motivated by guilt over slaughters in Rwanda, Sudan and Kosovo and not by any systemic threat to our country.

They are outraged by the fact that what may happen is an act of war and a willingness to risk American lives to make up for a slip of the tongue about “red lines.” These acts would be for retribution and to restore the reputation of a president.

 http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/09/the-team-of-nitwits-what-does-the-military-think.php