THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 4/27/2021
Enviros
in error, never in doubt
Whether it’s Earth Day,
May Day (“celebrating” Communism), or the day in 1619 when 20 or so slaves were
sold from a Portuguese ship (one of a 36-ship fleet carrying many thousands of
Ndongo slaves to Latin America), that was seized by pirates who landed in
pre-United States North America—significant events in the leftist/progressive
calendar are built on erroneous, but never doubted, foundations.
Consider the verdict in ex-officer Derek
Chauvin’s trial, wherein “reasonable doubt” is the standard for judgement.
Reasonable people can, in fact, have doubts 1) that the legal standards for
murder or manslaughter were met; 2) that the jury was sufficiently free of
outside intimidation to dare give the “presumption of innocence” to Chauvin; or
3) that courts of appeal will ignore the certainty that rioting, looting, arson
and loss of life will follow “protests” over any reversal of verdicts.
A fair-minded person
could easily see that keeping the trial in Minneapolis denied Chauvin fairness,
or that—as liberal constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz asserted—"Maxine
Waters Used KKK Tactics to Intimidate Chauvin Jury” (pjmedia.com, 4/22). “The
Klan would march outside of courthouses and threaten all kinds of reprisals if
the jury ever dared convict a white person or acquit a black person.”
Remember that the
Democrat Party was the party of slavery (the Republican Party was founded in
1854 to oppose slavery), and held all political power in the South. They
enforced Jim Crow laws, the disenfranchisement, the segregation and the
disarmament of “Negroes” (acceptable, legal term then; southern Dems used
another n-word). Without large Republican support, African-Americans would not have
seen Civil Rights laws enacted.
Before writing to
lambaste and demonize me, do the honest thing and look up Mr. Dershowitz’s
article by title. Also, read Joy Pullmann’s piece, “There’s No Way Americans
Can Trust The Jury’s Chauvin Verdict; A fair trial might have come to the same
conclusion. But we'll never know, and never be able to trust this outcome,
because America's left purposefully made a fair trial impossible,”
(Thefederalist.com, 4/21).
I am also sympathetic
to conservative firebrand and lawyer, Kurt Schlichter’s conclusion: “This Trial
Was A Disgrace.” If incisive, informed legal analysis is desired, see John
Hinderaker’s “Thoughts on the Chauvin Trial and Verdict.”
Democrats have eagerly
supported the violent, hateful “antifa-BLM” movement; in June, 2020, at the
height of rioting, looting and arson, “House Dems Unanimously Block Resolution
Condemning Violence and Rioting; Resolution also decried efforts to defund the
police,” by Collin Anderson (6/25/2021, Freebeacon.com). Rep. Greg Steube’s (R.-Fla.)
resolution condemned George Floyd’s killing, supported peaceful protesters and
decried “the deliberate targeting of law enforcement officers.”
You may say Dems just
want “police reform,” “reimagining law enforcement” and “equity” (all empty,
hypocritical euphemisms). “Don't Forget: Democrats Crushed a Senate Police
Reform Bill Because They Didn't Like the Black Man Proposing It,” by Kira Davis
(4/20). Last June, Senator Tim Scott (R.-S.C.) proposed a reform bill designed
to curb police brutality; it was not only voted down but also not even
acknowledged by the media. The Dem/media cabal didn’t want a Black Republican
to get any credit for a serious proposal to help solve the biggest complaint
they had.
So without doubt are
the levers of (Democrat-run) government agencies, that the Postal Service has tasked
itself—with statutory authority, technical capability and police powers—to “quietly
run a program that tracks and collects Americans’ social media posts, including
those about planned protests, according to a document obtained by Yahoo News.
“The details of the
surveillance effort, known as iCOP, or Internet Covert Operations Program, have
not previously been made public. The work involves having analysts trawl
through social media sites to look for what the document describes as ‘inflammatory’
postings and then sharing that information across government agencies.” See “Lee
Smith Nails It Again, The US Postal Service Surveillance Scandal is Targeting
Trump Supporters, Not All Americans,” (with 5-minute video, Sundance, 4/23,
Theconservativetreehouse.com)
Erroneous mask mandates
and lockdowns are also exempt from doubt and criticism; for another column.
“Enviros always in
error, never in doubt” would describe Earth Day predictions over the decades.
Before allowing your, or your children’s, anxiety—over new predictions of
environmental doom—to lead to stress, consider the universal failure of “green”
projections: “(15) Failed Earth Day predictions of 1970. The reason you
shouldn’t believe Earth Day predictions of 2009,” (4/22/2009);
“Earth Day Turns 50;
Half a century later, a look back at the forecasters who got the future
wrong—and the one who got it right,” by Ronald Bailey (5/2020, reason.com);
“History Confirms Democrat’s 1988 Senate Global Warming Hearing Got Everything
Wrong from Start to Finish,” (Larry Hamlin, wattsupwiththat.com, 4/22/2021).
A 2017 Amazon
bestseller, “Inconvenient Facts; The science that Al Gore doesn’t want you to
know,” by Gregory Wrightstone, was updated for “Earth Day 2020—Celebrating 50
years of failed forecasts”:
“By 1985 city dwellers
will need to wear gas masks; By 1989: 4 billion people will die. By 2000:
England won’t exist; No crude oil; 75-80% of all species extinct; Entire
nations gone; Civilization will end. 50 million climate refugees by 2010;
another 50 million by 2020. Life expectancy decreases by 42 years.”
Reality: “Air
pollution, deserts, wildfires, tornados, infant mortality, extreme
weather-related deaths, temperature-linked deaths—all declined. Vegetation increased;
polar bear population doubled; life expectancy increased 30% to 78.8 (U.S.).”
Inconvenientfacts.xyz: “Wrightstone presents the science to assess the basis of
the threatened Thermageddon.”
Not to be left out of
the climate nuttery, Time’s cover: “Climate is Everything—How the Pandemic can
lead us to a better, greener world.” Being a “Green lefty” means never having
to admit errors, and never undoing government policies or power based on said
errors.
No comments:
Post a Comment