Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Here's How the Democrats Are Blowing the Midterms

Here's How the Democrats Are Blowing the Midterms

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

It can’t be said enough that history is on the Democrats’ side, but they seem determined to blow it. Precedent alone should hand Democrats a comfortable advantage this year.

Only three midterms in nearly a century broke the pattern.

In 2002, George W. Bush's Republicans held their ground just over a year after the 9/11 attacks, when national security dominated everything else. In 1998, Bill Clinton's Democrats benefited when Republicans overplayed their hand chasing impeachment over the Monica Lewinsky scandal. In 1934, Franklin Roosevelt's Democrats rode the enduring popularity of the New Deal through the depths of the Great Depression. Each exception had a distinct, extraordinary set of circumstances behind it.

On the surface, it looks like Democrats should be able to win easily. Aside from precedent, Donald Trump's polling gives them even more room to work with. Yet recent surveys suggest Democrats are underperforming badly enough that the wave they were counting on might not materialize.

That underperformance could cost them control of the House.

If Republicans hold the House this November, the reasons will be obvious: a socialist insurgency reshaping the party from within, and a singular obsession with opposing Trump that has crowded out everything else voters actually care about.

The evidence is already sitting in the polling.

On the generic congressional ballot, Republicans are either tied with Democrats or ahead by three to four points, nowhere near the margin Democrats need to flip the House. A recent Washington Post/Ipsos poll put Democrats up just 48% to 45% on that same generic ballot question. Asked which party they agree with more on the issues that matter to them, voters split 41% Republican to 40% Democrat. Asked which party they trust more to handle the economy, the gap widened: 39% for Republicans to 35% for Democrats.

ICYMI: Democrats Don't Want You to See This Video of Biden on Election Interference

Analysts at The Wall Street Journal have said a Democratic edge of anything under four points on election night is good news for Republicans trying to hold the majority. Right now, Democrats aren't clearing that bar.

Here's the part that should really worry them. Trump's disapproval rating among Democrats is far lower than it was during his first term. In 2018, 90% of Democrats disapproved of him. In 2026, that number sits at 69%. Despite those low approval numbers, most surveys still don't show Democrats building a clear advantage in the races that will actually decide who controls the House.

Democrats have assumed that being anti-Trump is enough. But the fact is, they aren’t giving voters a reason to vote Democrat, and the party's growing tolerance for socialism isn’t helping them. Socialism remains deeply unpopular with the broader electorate, and its visible presence inside the Democrat Party is giving persuadable voters a reason to back Republicans they might not have otherwise supported.

Every historical tailwind is blowing in Democrats' direction this year, and still, Democrats may fail to capitalize on any of it. Make no mistake about it, if they blow this midterm, they won't be able to blame the map, the money, or the message alone. They will have blown the most favorable set of conditions a minority party could ask for, and they will have done it to themselves.

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/07/20/heres-how-the-democrats-are-blowing-the-midterms-n4955245

Trump's Obsession With Election Integrity Will Save the Republic

Trump's Obsession With Election Integrity Will Save the Republic

AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

Top O' the Briefing

Happy Monday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Reirkrebbdo was having surprising luck getting people to try Full Contact Lederhosen YAHTZEE!

Most of the "Top 'O the Briefing" for Friday morning had already been written last Thursday night by the time President Donald Trump was finished with his speech, which is why I didn't comment on it. Regulars here in Briefingland know that I don't think that we can talk about election integrity too much, especially in this most critical election year. 

While Senate Jellyfish Majority Leader John Thune keeps riding the Useless Wuss train rather than pass the SAVE America Act, President Trump is making sure that discussions regarding shoring up our vulnerable election processes stay front and center. 

That tenacity is precisely what I voted for. 

The Democrats' assault on fair and free elections is relentless and fierce. It's the only thing beyond their hatred for President Trump that they focus on. If their claims about fraud being almost nonexistent were true, they wouldn't bristle so much whenever we mention even looking into it. Innocent people aren't that edgy all the time. 

The current drama shows the Democrats at their hypocritical worst. Unable to admit that they lost the 2016 presidential election because Trump ran a better campaign and Hillary Clinton is the least likable human being on the planet Earth, they wholeheartedly spun and embraced a false narrative about foreign interference. It was, as far as this Cold War kid can remember, the first time that the Democrats said anything negative about Russia. 

Now that there is evidence of actual foreign tampering in an American election, the Democrats would have their low-info base believe that the very notion is preposterous. A lot of that has to do with the fact that the Democrats are reluctant to cast aspersions on their ChiCom buddies. 

Catherine wrote a post that chronicled some of the Dem hysteria after the president's speech, including a bit of insanity from pathological election denier and fake Governor of Georgia Stacey Abrams. Again, they're a jittery lot for people who have nothing to hide. 

A recent circuit court ruling was a bright spot in the ongoing fight; Catherine also covered that:

The court granted the motion for stay in the case of the NAACP v. USPS, based on the strength of the appellants' arguments. In other words, the court agreed that USPS is likely to win its case based on the Constitution and on the timeframe which the Postal Service has to implement a framework for ballots ahead of the midterm elections.

Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney for the central district of California, posted, “This ruling is a win for election integrity and would have significant implications for states like California that refuse to submit their voter rolls to verify compliance with federal election laws.”

As Catherine goes on to explain, the USPS is trying to ensure a tighter chain of custody for the mail-in ballots. I'll take the win, but I still think that the only way to make vote-by-mail more secure is to make it so restrictive that even people on our side of the aisle would complain about it. 

Baby steps. 

It's true that President Trump is surrounded by people who are helping him in this never-ending battle, but it's only a fight because he's making it one. I didn't say "might" save the Republic in the headline because I do think that Trump will keep at it until things are much better. If elections were poker games, I was all-in in November of 2024 and hit the jackpot. It's a comfort knowing that he won't let this go. 

Now if he could just get that low-T weakling Thune to man up. 

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/07/20/the-morning-briefing-trumps-obsession-with-election-integrity-will-save-the-republic-n4955224/?utm_campaign=nl_pm&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjmediambvip

About Those Burn Bags President Trump Mentioned in His Address to the Nation

About Those Burn Bags President Trump Mentioned in His Address to the Nation

AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

In addition to its general corruptibility, one thing you can be sure of when it comes to the federal government is that it’s probably not a good idea to trust federal employees to conceal your misdeeds. In the bureaucracy, "good enough" is the standard for quality work

And so, when President Donald Trump delivered his address to the nation on July 16, he brought attention to something we should know much more about but don’t yet: the discovery of “burn bags,” which Trump said contained sensitive documents from the Obama administration.

Trump said, “Recently, we found significant numbers of burn bags... and this is a group of bags that were used to destroy information given by President Barack Hussein Obama to be burned....These bags were supposed to be at a different level, by different people, incinerated...but it never happened. Maybe we got lucky.”

As the term implies, burn bags contain material that is slated for destruction, sending all of the former administration’s secrets into that big shredder in the sky. But someone “dropped the bag,” and more than a few of them were left to be discovered by the second Trump administration in the FBI building.

Now that Trump is sitting on a political treasure trove of data and information that can be used to expose the left, expect a distraction or two. Whenever the left panics, you start to see ginned-up controversies over allegations of Trump "stealing our democracy," "climate change," "Christian nationalism," or all of the above.

Given the seriousness of the potential contents of those burn bags, it wouldn’t surprise me if the left goes even harder with its lies and wrap-up smears to try to take Trump out using the 25th Amendment to the Constitution.

As a result of the Trump administration’s discovery of those burn bags, the president ordered the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the CIA to review the documents, analyze them, and see if any laws were broken. That analysis will focus on the handling of the sensitive information and the chain of custody of the documents themselves, and the contents of the documents that were never destroyed.

It must be noted that simply finding some old burn bags doesn't mean something improper was done. The federal government uses burn bags as a matter of course to destroy sensitive materials that will no longer be kept on file.

The president believes that the bags of documents could unearth critical information that has been concealed from the public eye. He bases this viewpoint on his past experience with both the Obama and Biden administrations and their pattern of not preserving, or not providing access to, certain important intelligence information.

In other words, Trump knows what he doesn’t know, and he wants answers. Could those bags contain more proof of the deep state covering up election schemes? Do any contain information that implicates specific members of the Obama or Biden administrations?

If Trump knows, he’s not naming names or providing details just yet.

Trump’s mention of those burn bags was in the context of his larger address on election integrity failures and questionable activities on the part of Democrat administrations, their political operatives, and others. As leftists circle the wagons to protect their favorite former Democrat presidents and their people, leftist central messaging is already testing the following key messages:

  • "Alleging foreign interference in an election is not proof (evidence) that a foreign government successfully controlled the outcome." This is like saying, “Sure he had a gun and shot at ya, but he missed ya, so he didn’t do anything wrong.”
  • "Criminal charges require more than political accusations." Of course, this is true, but where do criminal charges themselves come from? They come from accusations that can be supported by evidence.
  • "Even if you find some incriminating information in those burn bags, you’re going to need to prove that the person implicated knowingly violated federal law." Depending on the situation, that would be a matter for the courts to decide, but this key message gets at understanding and intent, which in a PR sense can be a straw man. For example, it doesn’t matter whether you intended to kill someone with your car; if you ran over them, intentionally or not, you likely broke a law or two. In other words, “I did not know there was a law against this” is no excuse.
  • "The discovery of documents alone would not establish a criminal conspiracy." Another straw man. No one is saying “discovery of documents” is all you need. If the documents contain words and sentences that do establish a criminal conspiracy, someone’s goose may be cooked.
  • "As for China, investigators must have direct evidence of coordination, communication, or actions that link actual people to the effort to tamper with an election." Once again, this is just a description of the legal and justice process. All of this is true, but stating it does not get anyone off the hook.

Back in 2020 and 2021, when Trump sought to use the court system to contest the manner in which the 2020 election was conducted, he literally had no time left in his term to go the legal route as president. By the time the courts would consider some of his claims, he was essentially an outsider without access to much of the information that he now has.

After election day in 2020, Trump was shut out of the system long enough to ensure that he would live the rest of his life in political exile after one term in office. But in 2024, Trump shocked the world and won.

His administration now has access to what it needs to better determine what happened in 2020, to address it, and, hopefully, to tap the justice system to ensure such corruption never happens again.

https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/07/19/about-those-burn-bags-president-trump-mentioned-in-his-address-to-the-nation-n4955234?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

This Law Means That Praying at a Northern Ireland Hospital Could Land You in Trouble With the Police

This Law Means That Praying at a Northern Ireland Hospital Could Land You in Trouble With the Police
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

A new statement released by authorities in the United Kingdom could mean that individuals who bring a Bible into a hospital could face punishment for violating an “abortion safe access zone.”

The updated guidelines released by the Police Service of Northern Ireland were in response to questions generated by the Abortion Services Act of 2023 in Northern Ireland, according to Fox News.

The PSNI clarified that an offense against the legislation would be for “anyone who is not one of those protected persons to behave within a Safe Access Zone in a way that influences, prevents access for, or causes harassment, alarm or distress to a person attending for abortion services – whether directly or indirectly.”

“Critically a person does not have to intend to commit an offence,” the PSNI continued. “Under the act, it is sufficient that a person was reckless as to whether their behaviour had one of those effects. This means that a person cannot avoid liability simply by claiming they did not mean to influence or distress anyone.”

The PSNI further explained that the lawfulness of prayer, Scripture readings, the carrying of a Bible or other religious materials, pastoral ministry, and even “visible religious practice” that could “directly or indirectly influence a person” seeking an abortion would constitute an offense under Northern Ireland law.

No exemptions are made for those who serve in a religious or ministerial capacity. One retired pastor has already been convicted and fined for “preaching a Gospel sermon near a hospital” in 2024, with courts demanding that he pay $614 in May.

The updated regulations against the practice of faith come as censorship levels in the U.K. escalate to unprecedented heights.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/josephchalfant/2026/07/19/this-law-means-that-praying-at-a-northern-ireland-hospital-could-land-you-in-trouble-with-the-police-n2679713?utm_source=thdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Watch: Show Host Wrecks NYC DSA Co-Chair Over Radical Goals in Brutal Interview

Watch: Show Host Wrecks NYC DSA Co-Chair Over Radical Goals in Brutal Interview

AP Photo/Jon Cherry

The new platform of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) got a lot of attention this week.

The revision to the DSA platform, "Workers Deserve More," plans to abolish the Senate entirely and replace the president and Supreme Court with an executive branch and judiciary elected by and subordinate to Congress. 

They also want to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), defund the Department of War, end deportations, ease restrictions on immigration control for migration between countries, and "extend full voting rights to people with criminal convictions and noncitizens."

We covered what the DSA national co-chair said about abolishing the Senate. 


READ MORE: Yikes: DSA Co-Chair Just Made a Big Admission About One of Their Goals to Change Our Government


Now, Fox's Martha MacCallum has interviewed the New York City DSA co-chair Gustavo Gordillo. She does a great job asking questions that expose the problems with the organization's positions. Gordillo also didn't do a very good job in response. 

Here, he attacks the Senate as an "undemocratic institution," and MacCallum has to explain to him that's by the design of the Constitution. 

Gordillo argued that when you ask people if the system is working for them, most people are unhappy. That could be, but if you also asked them if they would scrap the system and replace it with socialism or Communism, they would tell you how great this system is in comparison. 

They want to get rid of the Senate to make things more "democratic" and expand the House. That's expressly contradictory to the Constitution and the Founders' intent, which was to specifically reject a pure democracy and mob rule. 

Gordillo spoke about how they pushed for freezing the rent in NYC. He claimed no landlord "had a Constitutional right" to a double-digit return on his investment. 

So they will freeze the rent, which will lead to more landlords being unable to maintain the building, which will then adversely affect the tenants with things that can't be repaired, and have fewer available apartments. 

MacCallum asked a great question that called out this whole sham basis for socialism and Communism: how does the government become more democratized, if the government takes over more of the power [from the people]? It's out and out contradictory. She pointed out how the one government-run grocery store they're going to have in NYC costs $30 million in taxpayer dollars, is going to put competitive pressure on the bodegas in the neighborhood - you know, the working people that the DSA claims they care about, who are by no means billionaires. His answer is incredible. 

He said they were about having a government that "works for ordinary people." 

"If one publicly owned grocery store that brings prices down in the neighborhood is enough to put someone out of business, then maybe they shouldn't have been in that business in the first place."

"Interesting," MacCallum replies, almost not believing how much he is cooking himself and the DSA. 

So much for caring about those "working people" bodega owners. How then is the government any different than a billionaire business in this analogy? That bodega owner and his customers are just going to get stomped on by the government, which is using their tax dollars to do it. 

The funniest part of the interview was when she nailed him on why people leave other countries to come to the U.S.  They talked about his parents leaving Peru during the time of the Maoist Shining Path group, and coming here. "So why did your family come to America?" she asked. 

“The economic situation in South America and Peru was in a really bad place… much of what we could say was responsible for that actually was the imposition of capitalism and American imperialism. In many cases, it is actually what brings immigrants to the U.S., coming out of Latin America.”  

Of course, that's nonsensical. They're largely fleeing because of Communism and autocratic rulers who don't allow them to thrive as they can here. 

Martha MacCallum wasn't letting his answer go, “So, they come here because they don’t like the imposition of American imperialism in the country that they’re in?” 

Gordillo said yes.

MacCallum finished him, “That doesn’t make much sense.”

Exactly, very well done. 

Democrats have largely welcomed these extremists who will eat them alive.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2026/07/18/nyc-dsa-co-chair-remarks-on-fox-n2204475?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Putting the 'Progress' in Progressivism — 13M Pounds of Revolting Waste Removed From Dystopian LA Park

Putting the 'Progress' in Progressivism — 13M Pounds of Revolting Waste Removed From Dystopian LA Park

MacArthur Park, Los Angeles. (Credit: Wurzeller)

The number kind of blows your mind. Thirteen million. Thirteen million of anything signifies a large amount of whatever it is you’re talking about, but 13 million pounds of human waste and trash and hazardous material left by homeless people in a city park? That’s just revolting.

And yet that’s exactly what the leadership of California has brought us, from the inept Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to the vain, feckless Gov. Gavin Newsom, who’s been promising to end the homeless crisis for decades. I remember back in the day hearing hushed conversations about Calcutta, India, and how its endemic poverty represented exactly what you don’t want to see in a modern city.

But is this so different?

The shocking numbers reveal just how disgusting things are allowed to become in the park, which is right smack in the middle of the city’s downtown area. I didn’t have Taco Bell this week, but I almost feel like I did when I read about the stark reality on the ground:

Shocking new records reveal the filthy reality of Los Angeles’ notoriously rundown MacArthur Park — where city crews hauled away nearly 13 million pounds of trash and hazardous waste last year.

Records obtained by The California Post through a public records request show sanitation workers dragged out more more than 6,359 tons of disgusting debris in 2025, including a staggering 142,329 pounds of human waste.

I can't imagine anyone is planning on bringing their kids to play there anytime soon.


"PROGRESS": Feds Move in on LA's Drug-Infested MacArthur Park, Expose Karen Bass' Fecklessness in the Process

Trapped by Zombies: Pregnant LA Mom Recounts Horrifying Trip to Store, Says She'll Vote Differently Now


The area originated in the 1880s as Westlake Park, but was renamed in 1942 to honor Gen. Douglas MacArthur following his victories in World War II. I doubt he would have ever wanted his name associated with this kind of state-sanctioned depravity:

Real estate pro John Alle, who, as we’ve reported, has been on a long-term quest to save the city of Santa Monica and who has been rewarded not by assistance from authorities, but by a concussion and broken jaw courtesy of meth addicts, also has property near the park. His experiences shock the conscience:

“Our team discovered half-carved rats, dead cats with blood from body punctures, wheelchair parts, discarded food, plastics, needles, bongs and liquor bottles. Sadly, dead seagulls were the first level of crud floating on top.”


FIGHTING AGAINST THE TIDE: Santa Monica Anti-Crime Activist Assaulted by Methheads, Left With Concussion and Broken Jaw

Latest Stabbings Reveal the Violent Underbelly of Santa Monica After Dark: Chop Shops, Meth, Death on the Streets 


The most frustrating thing about these situations? They're entirely preventable, but the far-left braintrust that has taken over the Golden State likes it this way and does everything in its power to enable their continuation. Way‑out‑there City Councilwoman Eunisses Hernandez, whose District 1 includes the park, has paved the way for exactly what we’re witnessing:

Hernandez has supported city-funded programs that distributed tens of thousands of syringes and crack pipes in the public space, pouring more than $27 million into the park and surrounding area.

“It’s now proven that these harm reduction programs, where tax dollars are spent on facilitating drug use by handing out syringes and keeping people addicted, do not work,” LA’s top federal prosecutor, Bill Essayli, who’s office has worked with the LAPD and DEA to crack down on drug use and dealing the park, told The California Post.

This is what progressive politics brings you, this is what one-party rule wreaks, and this is what the Democratic Socialists of America want to import to your city or town.

It’s wake-up time in America, even if it’s too late for the failed dystopian state of California.

https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2026/07/19/putting-the-progress-in-progressivism-13m-pounds-of-revolting-waste-removed-from-dystopian-la-park-n2204485?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl