Monday, June 22, 2026

Some Real Talk About the Iran Deal

Some Real Talk About the Iran Deal

Some Real Talk About the Iran Deal
X/The White House

It’s time to take a hard look at the memorandum of understanding (MOU) and to think about it objectively. On one hand, it is not the utter catastrophe that a lot of people – people who largely agree with my position that we should be actively destroying these goat-molesting, pagan semi-humans – think it is. On the other hand, it’s a crap sandwich, and there’s no need to take a bite and announce that it’s “Yummy.” It is not yummy, but it might be the best we can hope for today.

The adult world is full of bad choices. If there were some sort of easy solution to this conflict, it would’ve likely been solved long ago. But there isn’t. There are no optimal courses of action. There are only various levels of suboptimal courses of action. Once we, like adults, accept that, we can move forward. First, let’s examine what the MOU is. It’s more of a pause, an interregnum, or even a halftime (as my friend Hugh Hewitt calls it). This isn’t going to be the end of the 50-year war with the Iranian mullahs. Nobody thinks that, including Donald Trump, no matter what he says. Like every experienced negotiator, Donald Trump is never going to publicly say what he actually thinks, and anyone expecting him to is a child and unworthy of your attention. This agreement will not end the war because the war is rooted in an irresolvable dispute. These 17th-century savages are religious fanatics who believe that their fake Mahdi is going to crawl out of a well or something and blah blah blah blah blah. The bottom line is they can’t tolerate the existence of the Jewish state, or the West, or anybody whose culture isn’t run by people who shouldn’t be allowed within 1,000 feet of a school. The only way this war is going to end is when one side is fully and completely defeated. So this is not peace. This is a hudna, a temporary truce that both sides exploit to prepare to resume fighting.

If you can’t accept that we are at war with Islamic fanatics, I can’t help you. To those of you with your eyes tightly shut and your hands pressed against your ears, yelling, “I can’t hear you! I can’t hear you!” I know you don’t want to be in a forever war. I know that it’s inconvenient for you, and you don’t like it. And I also know that what you want doesn’t matter. It doesn’t take two to be in a war. It only takes one. If one guy isn't in a war, the war doesn’t last long because the guy who doesn’t fight back loses. I propose we not only fight back, but we defeat this enemy that’s been trying to destroy the West for 1,500 years.

Yes, you can put me down as a hawk. My preferred way to fulfill our strategy – which must be regime change, even though nobody can say “regime change” aloud – is kinetic. I propose we blow the living snot out of them, to use the technical term. But here’s the problem. Most Americans don’t agree with me. If you look at the polls, it’s very clear that people would prefer not to be in a kinetic fight with the Iranians at this time. I have the luxury of not having any responsibility. I wasn’t elected president. I’m not in command of anything. But Donald Trump was elected and is in command, and he’s got a lot of moving parts to consider. He chose to go forward with the MOU not because he’s weak or stupid or cowardly or a bad negotiator – that’s a cope – but because he’s got other priorities at present that this lame MOU supports.

Here’s one key fact – for various reasons, including the perfidy of allegedly allied governments, oil is not moving through the Strait of Hormuz. Part of that has to do with insurance, and a big part has to do with alleged allies leaning on insurance companies not to cover ships that would otherwise transit the Strait. The idea that somehow the Iranians just discovered, like a month ago, that they had hundreds of miles of coastline along the Strait and could interdict it with military force is so stupid it’s not even worth addressing. Of course, they knew about that. And of course, we knew about that. We’ve wargamed it for decades. It was a risk of war, and war is in large part about managing risk.

What Trump did was make a deal to open the Straits so the American economy could recover. You can already see gas prices going down. Now, this was important to him for a couple of reasons. First, we didn’t need a worldwide recession. There is talk out there, and I’m no expert on the oil industry, so take it for what it’s worth, but apparently, Trump believes that world oil stocks were going to be depleted, and the price was going to go through the roof. That would have sent the Western economy into a tailspin, and there would’ve been follow-on effects from that. Yeah, war is expensive and disruptive to the economy. Who knew? And while I would’ve happily borne the increased price per gallon in order to destroy the Iranian mullahs, the fact is, most people wouldn’t. I don’t have to like that fact. But that’s a fact. And Donald Trump is forced to deal with facts, not just theory on X.

So Donald Trump kicked the can down the road, although it’s not clear how far. Threatening the Strait of Hormuz is viable right now, but the mullahs’ now- acknowledged ability to interdict traffic through the Strait is what we call a depreciating asset. It’s not going to be there, at least to the same extent, forever. The other Gulf States have figured out what’s happening, and they’re not just going to sit there and not do something about it. There are already massive oil pipelines heading west – those of us in Desert Storm drove by the major one in northern Saudi Arabia as we went out to the desert along scenic Tapline Road (Who else remembers beautiful Hafir al-Batin, which makes Deming, New Mexico, look like Paris?). They will build a lot more. It’s going to take time, but eventually, the Gulf States are going to work around the ability of Iran to completely cut off their oil exports. Time is on our side, but you have to think of time not in terms of months but years. Americans are notoriously bad at that. 

It’s going to be years until we resolve this war. We have to think in the long term, and the long-term goal is getting rid of these mullahs and installing somebody who’s not going to be a problem. This war was an opportunity for the Iranian people to rise up and get rid of their fanatic masters. They didn’t do that, for various reasons. We can thank the Kurds for stealing the weapons Trump tried to send them – yeah, the Middle East is wonderful. But what’s clear is that we’re not going to do it for them. There’s literally no one who wants to physically invade Iran and take it over and govern it. That gives the mullahs an advantage: all they have to do is not die. I would make them die, but that’s just me.

But we’ve got a long way to go to neutering them. And while we’ve utterly gutted their military capabilities, including their nuclear program – anybody who ignores that and starts telling you that this MOU is worse than the JCPOA is unworthy of your attention because that’s just stupid – they still have a bunch of guys with small arms who can oppress their own people. These thugs have to be eliminated in detail, and the only ones who can do that are the Iranians themselves.

Again, the mullahs have been largely defanged. Most of their current threats are hypothetical – it’s not clear they can actually sink a ship going through the Strait of Hormuz, but the shippers don’t want to take that chance, so the threat is sufficient. The mullahs have other moves to make, too. Remember that the enemy gets a vote. They are desperately trying to keep Israel from annihilating their primitive pederast proxy Hezbollah, whose members have a ton of American blood on their paws. Israel can’t live with these creeps firing missiles into its land and essentially making northern Israel uninhabitable. It’s got to drain this abscess, but the Iranians are trying to use that as a wedge to drive the United States and Israel apart. The predictably moronic collection of podcasters, libertarians, traitors, and drooling idiots is going along with the information operation, demanding that America abandon Israel.

At the moment, it would be more convenient for the United States if Israel weren’t publicly wiping out Hezbollah – I don’t think anyone who’s not a clown sheds any sincere tears for these monsters. JD Vance is taking the lead in telling Israel to essentially chill out, and a lot of pro-Israel Americans are upset about that. That’s overwrought – America and Israel do have different interests, and he’s just saying that truth out loud. What we should be doing is giving Israel a behind-the-scenes go-ahead to do what it needs to do. Every time it kills a Hezbollah or Hamas terrorist, an angel gets its wings. And here’s the tough news for the pro-Israel crowd, of which I am one – you’ve got no place else to go. All the Democrats hate you and want all the Jews to die. Let’s get the cards out there – they would be happy for Israel’s enemies to butcher everybody from the river to the sea. The Republicans are largely aligned with Israel on security concerns, but the Venn diagram is not a perfect circle. A 90 percent friend is not a 10 percent enemy. 

And here’s some more real talk, which I don’t necessarily love. The American people like this MOU deal. A majority supports it. They want the current kinetic phase over. They don’t love Iran. They don’t hate Israel. They just want this fighting to stop. I don’t agree with them, but I don’t get to tell them what to think. Trump’s the guy who has to deal with that. And Trump understands the stakes. If the Democrats take the House (which is not entirely assured, as recent polls show the Democrats losing ground) and/or the Senate, that would be really bad. He’s got to consider that. And he is considering that. He wants the economy kicking. He wants the shooting to stop. He thinks that’s the best way to survive the midterms, and he’s got pretty good instincts.

There are complaints that the Iranians are going to be able to sell their oil again, but any deal was going to allow them to do so. They were selling their oil before the conflict started, and their country's economy was still in ruins. It will still be in ruins after it starts selling oil again. 

As for sanctions relief and this $300 billion rehabilitation fund, we will see. That is only supposed to happen if the mullahs cooperate. But, of course, the mullahs aren’t going to cooperate. They are going to be a continual pain in the tush. We need to see whether President Trump will reward them for their misbehavior. He will, if he thinks it’s to his advantage. Now, there’s an idea out there that Donald Trump actually believes and trusts these guys, and that’s either unbelievably stupid or pure wishcasting. He knows exactly who these people are, and he’s got to know that they will screw with him from now until November. But that’s OK. A bunch of these savages getting on Twitter and making their announcements is not the same as actual fighting. 

Trump is going to try to drag this out past the midterms. That 60-day nuclear negotiation? Of course, that’s going to get extended. There’s precisely zero chance that’s going to be resolved. But understand that their nuclear program has been blown to smithereens. We are not back in a worse position than we were before we entered this righteous conflict. We’re in a much better position. And in the long term, the correlation of forces is in our favor. Israel is wiping out its proxies. The Gulf states are strengthening their defenses, so Iran can’t do again what it just did. We are rebuilding, rearming, and retargeting. And Iran’s regime? It’s still impoverished and teetering on the edge of collapse.

You wouldn’t know it from all the whining online and the self-serving crap of the Democrats, who seemed just as mad about us not shooting as they were at us shooting, but we’re in a good position for the future. All the Iranian mullahs are just crying like the little b****s that they are. They accepted the MOU because they need the MOU as much as Trump does, maybe more. So, at the end of the day, crying like a little b***h is all they can do.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2026/06/22/some-real-talk-about-the-iran-deal-n2678042?utm_source=thdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-ACH7f6cTFQ&utm_term=&_nlid=ACH7f6cTFQ&_nhids=ncQq4CNMukdlls

Feds Reveal Violent Antifa Conspirators Coordinated With a Major Labor Union to Fight ICE in Minneapolis

Feds Reveal Violent Antifa Conspirators Coordinated With a Major Labor Union to Fight ICE in Minneapolis

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

It was a violent, full-court press against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by Antifa and other leftists in Minneapolis last winter, and some of the planning included a major labor union. 

The 94-page indictment released this week by the Justice Department officials in Minneapolis outlined in detail, using Antifa members' own words in their multiple encrypted Signal chats, how 15 defendants coordinated their "direct actions" to stop ICE from arresting and deporting people in the country illegally. 

They used their cars, breastplates, bodies, and other paraphernalia to hurt officers, barricade roads with multiple types of coordinated styles in an attempt to stop officers from moving freely about the city. Their "force, intimidation, and threats" against ICE and Department of Homeland Security officers

Most of the indictment outlining the conspiracy "to impede or injure a federal officer" is devoted to sharing the Signal messages capturing the coordination among the members of several sub-groups who called themselves Twin Cities Direct Action (TCDA), which they later changed to Direct Action Minnesota (DAMN), probably because it was a cooler acronym. 


In the chats, they discussed how they used protest marches to set up their hard and soft blockades.

And they urged violence against federal officers. A guy who made news for the following video, Kyle Wagner, was one of the 15 indicted by the feds. 

The coordinated activity included directing the local AFL-CIO union on where to place its members for maximum effect. 


Saying a labor union is involved in far-left protest activity is like saying the sun came up today for those who have been watching the Wobblies since the dawn of the last century, but the AFL-CIO was heavily involved in the Minnesota protests. One of their members was Alex Pretti, who was shot by federal agents as he tried to stop them. The Minnesota unions were all in on the protests. 

The 15 are charged with conspiracy, an extraordinary charge which has never been lodged against an organized Antifa activity, according to Antifa watcher Andy Ngo. 


Wagner was also charged with solicitation to commit a crime of violence and interstate threats in which he threatened to kidnap and murder a federal officer.

Isaac Sant and William Morgan are each charged with interstate stalking, in which they're alleged to have crossed state lines and used the federal interstate with "the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance" at least one federal officer in an attempt to scare the hell out of him. Or worse.

Morgan is also charged with assaulting a federal officer and destruction of federal property. 

Natasha Rakotz was also individually charged with assaulting a federal officer for purposely running her car into an officer. Renee Good wasn't alone in using this tactic. 

More: This Is the Biggest Self-Own by Leftists in This Entire Minneapolis ICE Charade

Far from being the disconnected collection of individuals in an imaginary organization as the left continually attests, the 15 Antifa anarchists, who belonged to multiple subgroups, discussed plans, mapped movements of ICE officers, organized rapid response vehicles, and had thousands of dollars to spend on their quest to stop ICE. And then carried out those plans. Maybe we'll find out where all that money came from.

Two of the indicted Antifa members are still on the loose. 

My prediction is that Portland Antifa is next. This same kind of coordinated activity continues to occur there.

To recap: What do you call 15 charged Antifa terrorists? A good start. 

https://pjmedia.com/victoria-taft/2026/06/18/feds-reveal-violent-antifa-conspirators-coordinated-with-a-major-labor-union-to-fight-ice-in-minneapolis-n4954092?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Anti-Americanism In the Public Schools

Anti-Americanism In the Public Schools

by John Hinderaker in Education, Leftism, Minnesota

It’s bad enough that our public schools are terrible. It’s worse that their curricula, in some states, are actively anti-American. In Minnesota, where I live, our legislature has mandated a change from teaching factual content to instilling left-wing activism. This is done in the guise of “Ethnic Studies” instruction.

My organization campaigned hard against the legislative Ethnic Studies mandate and has since campaigned to repeal it. Nevertheless, it is going into effect this year. How bad is it? We have released a series of videos exposing what “Ethnic Studies” really means. This is the third in the series; there are two more to come. Prepare to be shocked:

However bad you think the schools are, they are worse. While Minnesota is no doubt one of the worst offenders, don’t assume that the schools in your community are significantly better in terms of anti-Americanism.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2026/06/anti-americanism-in-the-public-schools.php

Send Them Back!

Send Them Back!

by John Hinderaker in Europe, Illegal immigration, Immigration

Mass deportations may be coming to Europe. The European Parliament has voted (418-218) to pass the new “Return Regulation.” It will facilitate deportation of asylum seekers and illegal immigrants, and includes various enforcement measures. Watch the MEPs chant “Send them back!” Some, like this Member of the European Parliament, think it will lead to mass deportations:

European voters are finally being heard. That is how it seems, anyway. Activists like Eva Vlaardingerbroek are getting traction. Will the Save Europe Act pass? I assume not, but stranger things have happened. (I see that YouTube restricts this video, you can’t have young people knowing there is a controversy about immigration):

Because, while European democracies obviously have decayed, they are still, at the end of the day, democracies. And we all know what most Europeans think about untrammeled third-world immigration. I posted this video once before, here it goes again:


We, and the Europeans, can dream, anyway.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2026/06/send-them-back.php

Sunday, June 21, 2026

America Is About to Celebrate Her 250th Birthday. And Democrats Feel Nothing but Hate.

America Is About to Celebrate Her 250th Birthday. And Democrats Feel Nothing but Hate.

America Is About to Celebrate Her 250th Birthday. And Democrats Feel Nothing but Hate.
AP Photo/Jon Cherry

America is gearing up for its 250th birthday, a historic milestone that should be a powerful moment of celebration and unity as Americans prepare to celebrate 250 years of freedom. But that shared American pride appears to be lacking on the left, as a bombshell poll suggests many Democrats harbor little overwhelming love for the United States.

"This to me is one of the most stunning divides that we have seen. You know, we're talking about polarization in politics, it even comes down to what you believe July 4th actually is. Like, what does July 4th mean to you," CNN's Harry Enten said. 

"Celebrate America, friends and family time. Among Republicans, what do you see? You see the clear majority say it's a time to celebrate America, 65 percent. Among Democrats, however, the plurality disagree. Look at that. What do you see? Friends and family time at 42 percent versus just 24 percent who say that what it means most to them is to celebrate America.

"So even on the basic question of what July 4th means to you, we have Republicans on one end saying celebrate America. More of them say that. And Democrats on the other end saying that it means more to them to have time with friends and family."

So what do they say about the flag? Even on the basic level of flag, look at this. Look at how we have an increasing polarization on this issue. We'll display the flag on July 4th, the American flag. Back in July of 2001, look at this. You had 68 percent of Republicans, 65 percent of Democrats saying that they would in fact display the flag on July 4th. You come over to this side of the screen. Republicans basically are where they were 25 years ago, right? 64 percent. But look at that Democratic percentage. Absolutely plummeting. Just 27 percent of Democrats say they will in fact display the flag on July 4th. Democrats and Republicans in different camps, even on the simple question of displaying the flag on July 4th.

"A polarization, a split that simply put did not exist a generation ago," Enten added. "What about the sloganeering about proud to be an American? OK, what about this idea? Are you proud to be an American, extremely or very proud to be an American? Again, look at this divide, a growing divide on this question. Back in January of 2001, 90 percent of Republicans, 85 percent of Democrats."

"You come over to this side of the screen in 2026. Look at this again. The Democratic percentage absolutely plummets to just 29 percent of Democrats say they're extremely or very proud to be an American. That Republican percentage, the exact same. 90 and 90."

Despite our country's shortcomings, national pride is not a measure of how well someone thinks the United States is doing at any given moment. It is faith in our founding ideals—freedom from tyranny, the right of every individual to pursue happiness without undue government interference, and the promise that hard work and opportunity can lead to success. When that pride begins to fade, those ideals begin to lose their meaning. That helps explain why so many on the left increasingly view America's institutions not as safeguards worth preserving, but as obstacles to be overcome, rather than the foundations that made the nation unique in the first place. 

No matter your politics, national pride is central to what it means to be an American. It is the recognition that, despite our challenges and imperfections, the United States remains one of the greatest nations on Earth, not only because of what it has achieved, but because of what it is still capable of achieving. 

Our politics may be more divided than ever, but division does not have to come at the expense of national pride. Once a nation loses faith in itself and the principles that made it exceptional, it risks losing the very foundation that made it worth celebrating in the first place.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/dmitri-bolt/2026/06/17/america-is-about-to-celebrate-her-250th-birthday-and-democrats-feel-nothing-but-hate-n2677896?utm_source=thdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-5tuDesezrZ&utm_term=&_nlid=5tuDesezrZ&_nhids=ncEAoFRrtGqgls

Brad Thor’s 'Choke Point' Proves Scot Harvath Is Still the Gold Standard of the Political Thriller

Brad Thor’s 'Choke Point' Proves Scot Harvath Is Still the Gold Standard of the Political Thriller

Brad Thor’s 'Choke Point' Proves Scot Harvath Is Still the Gold Standard of the Political Thriller
"Choke Point" by Brad Thor

The wars of the 21st century will not typically begin with the brutalist modalities of armies crossing borders or missiles flying across the horizon. More often, they will unfold quietly—in cyberspace, through economic coercion, by means of information warfare, or through covert efforts designed to destabilize societies from within.

Asymmetry will shape the future, with kinetic actions manipulated by AI systems, and information mechanisms dominated by illusions, and great deceptions created by minds made of silicon—inherent with the baffling subtleties of superposition.

Few contemporary thriller writers understand that uncomfortable reality better than Brad Thor.

With “Choke Point,” his 25th novel featuring legendary operative Scot Harvath, Thor once again demonstrates why he remains one of the most insightful voices in modern political fiction. Like Tom Clancy before him, Thor possesses a rare ability to take emerging geopolitical realities and transform them into a story that is both immensely entertaining and uncomfortably plausible. That realism is no accident.

During our conversation, Thor explained that he does not begin with action sequences or exotic locations. He begins with a geopolitical question.

I always wrap my books around some big geopolitical set piece,” Thor told Townhall. I call what I do faction, where you dont know where the facts end and the fiction begins.”

For “Choke Point,” that question centered on Chinas strategic ambitions in Southeast Asia. Thor became fascinated by Chinas desire to bypass the Strait of Malacca, a narrow maritime passage through which much of its commerce and energy supply flows. Thailand had resisted Chinese efforts to create a canal through the Kra Isthmus, preserving a strategic vulnerability that American naval power could exploit in a future conflict.

The novelists imagination then asked a question that intelligence professionals have long understood is often the beginning of a dangerous scenario: What happens when a powerful adversary cannot achieve its objective through persuasion?

What if the Chinese figured out a way to make things so unstable in Thailand that another military coup took place?” Thor told Townhall.

That question becomes the foundation for a thriller rooted not merely in military conflict, but in the far more complex world of covert influence, deniable operations, and political destabilization.

As a retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent who spent years working counterintelligence matters, I found this aspect of “Choke Point” particularly compelling. Modern adversaries rarely seek to defeat the United States in a conventional battle. They seek to weaken our alliances, exploit our divisions, and convince Americans to distrust one another.

Thor articulated that danger with remarkable clarity.

Our enemies want to create disunity,” he told Townhall. They benefit when were at each others throats because it erodes our confidence in ourselves as citizens and in our nation.”

The novels greatest surprise, however, may be its antagonist. After 25 books, the challenge for any author is creating an enemy who feels genuinely dangerous. Thor accomplishes that by making Harvaths opponent not a foreign terrorist but an American—a former Navy SEAL whose exceptional training and tragic fall from grace make him a mirror image of the hero pursuing him.

The concept itself grew from Thors fascination with a real military pipeline in which exceptionally capable Explosive Ordnance Disposal personnel were recruited to attempt Basic Underwater Demolition School (BUDS), the incredibly rigorous selection process for Navy SEALs. The result is a villain whose expertise exceeds even Harvaths in certain areas, particularly explosives, making him a uniquely formidable opponent.

Yet Thor avoids the trap of creating a one-dimensional villain. The best antagonists are often those whose motivations the reader can understand, even if their actions cannot be justified. This enemy is not a caricature of evil. He is a man who lost his identity when he lost the uniform and brotherhood that defined his life. That complexity has always distinguished Thors writing.

Early in the novel, after the bombing in Bangkok, Harvath expresses confidence in the FBIs Evidence Response Team with a line that immediately caught my attention: Theyre the best. If anyone can get to the bottom of this, its the Bureau.”

As someone who spent 20 years serving in the FBI, I appreciated that moment. At a time when public conversations about the Bureau are frequently dominated by political controversies, Thor portrays the organization with reference to the thousands of agents, analysts, scientists, and professional staff who quietly dedicate their lives to protecting the nation.

Its a tremendous organization that has done so much good for our country,” Thor told Townhall. I think the world of the men and women that work tirelessly to keep us safe.”

Perhaps the most revealing moment of our conversation came when I asked Thor what he had learned about Scot Harvath after writing the character for a quarter century. His answer revealed the deeper philosophy behind the entire series. There is no American Dream without those willing to protect it,” Thor told Townhall. It doesnt exist.”

That may be the single sentence that best explains why readers have followed Scot Harvath through 25 novels.

Harvath is not simply an action hero. He represents the enduring warrior ethos—courage, loyalty, discipline, and the willingness to enter dangerous places so that others can live safely.

“Choke Point” delivers everything longtime readers expect from a Brad Thor thriller: international intrigue, sophisticated intelligence tradecraft, a compelling villain, and relentless pacing. More importantly, it accomplishes what the best political thrillers always do. It entertains while forcing readers to think seriously about the threats that exist beyond the headlines.

Twenty-five novels after “The Lions of Lucerne” introduced Scot Harvath to readers, Brad Thor has proven that his greatest creation still has much to say about the world we inhabit—and the men and women who stand watch over it.

“Choke Point” is on sale today wherever books are sold! Also, don’t miss my long-form interview with Brad Thor about “Choke Point” here! 

https://townhall.com/columnists/johnnantz/2026/06/17/brad-thors-choke-point-proves-scot-harvath-is-still-the-gold-standard-of-the-political-thriller-n2677892?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-ce3HvvNTNu&utm_term=&_nlid=ce3HvvNTNu&_nhids=ncGAXFpNCjebls