Monday, October 5, 2026

'I'm Sickened by This': Mollie Hemingway Tears Into Jack Smith Over Stunning Arctic Frost Revelation

'I'm Sickened by This': Mollie Hemingway Tears Into Jack Smith Over Stunning Arctic Frost Revelation

'I'm Sickened by This': Mollie Hemingway Tears Into Jack Smith Over Stunning Arctic Frost Revelation
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

How far, exactly, was Jack Smith willing to go in order to take down Donald Trump? 

As it happens, there apparently wasn't a line the former special counsel, who was appointed by Biden Attorney General Merrick Garland, wasn't willing to cross – he even confiscated the communications of scores of journalists as part of the sprawling investigation known as Arctic Frost.

It emerged during Smith's Tuesday appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee that he and his investigators obtained records containing communications between Trump administration officials and journalists from more than a dozen news organizations. Those communications were discovered in records produced by the National Archives after Smith’s team subpoenaed material associated with 87 White House phones used during President Trump’s first administration.

RedState's Kyle Becker had all the details. 

[Chairman Chuck] Grassley said investigators subpoenaed 87 phones belonging to Trump White House officials and obtained records containing communications with journalists at major news organizations, including CBS News, CNN, Fox News, the Associated Press, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The Washington Times and The Federalist. CBS News reported the disclosure live from Tuesday's hearing.

This came, noted Kyle, "on top of the previously disclosed collection of phone records belonging to Republican members of Congress."

The revelation that Smith had targeted journalistic communications prompted Grassley to ask, "Now, what will partisan media say about this disgraceful government overreach?"

The answer, at least so far? Not much. 

There's been nary a peep from the upstanding D.C. press corps, who would be howling with outrage had their communications been swept up in an investigation by a Republican administration. Even those who had their messages nabbed by Smith are conspicuously silent. 

Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist, however, was happy to let her feelings be known after learning that Smith had nabbed some her communications. "I'm sickened by this news that my journalistic communications were obtained as part of Jack Smith's egregious misconduct," she tweeted on Tuesday afternoon.

I'm sickened by this news that my journalistic communications were obtained as part of Jack Smith's egregious misconduct.

Proud to have been one of the only journalists who debunked his agency's role in perpetrating the Russia collusion lie against the American people.

No amount of censorship or spying will prevent @FDRLST from continuing our fearless investigative journalism.

Think about the arrogance required here. Journalists depend on sources inside the federal government – and that includes the White House – to expose wrongdoing and hold the decision makers accountable. The confidentiality of those communications is fundamental to a free press.

None of that mattered to Jack Smith and his pursuit of Donald Trump, though. Everything was fair game to Smith, whose actions should send a chill down the spine of every journalist who values the ability to communicate with their sources without the worry that those messages could one day end up in a federal prosecutor's files.

The fact that so many in the media have failed to speak out like Mollie Hemingway has doesn't make Smith's conduct any less disturbing, but it sure does make their silence all the more damning.

https://redstate.com/terichristoph/2026/09/29/im-sickened-mollie-hemingway-blasts-jack-smith-n2207543?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Sunday, October 4, 2026

'Stomp on Her Head': Flydubai Hijacker Shows What Islam Really Thinks of Women

'Stomp on Her Head': Flydubai Hijacker Shows What Islam Really Thinks of Women

'Stomp on Her Head': Flydubai Hijacker Shows What Islam Really Thinks of Women
AP Photo/Tomer Appelbaum

Hey, this is a relief: “Islam affirms women’s equal dignity before God and guarantees their right to own property, keep their earnings, and seek divorce,” says the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research, which describes itself as “a nonprofit research institute” that was “established in 2016 to address contemporary questions about Islam through scholarship.”

Yaqeen even adds that “Islam transformed a society that held women in contempt, condemning female infanticide in the strongest terms and bringing the practice to an end. Women gained the right to refuse a marriage, own property, testify in court, seek divorce, and speak out against injustice. The Qur’an affirmed the dignity of daughters directly, and the Prophet promised Paradise to those who raise them well.”

Gee, that’s swell. And it makes it clear that Hamam al-Hammami, the Flydubai co-pilot who tried to crash his plane and thereby murder 174 Jews on their way back to Israel, must severely misunderstand his religion, right? He must, because the New York Post revealed Sunday that “the accused flydubai hijacker touted violence against women and expressed hate for Jews and gay people in sickening newly revealed social media posts he made while studying to be a pilot – before he went on to allegedly attack his captain with a crash axe and attempt to down a plane.”

Violence against women and hatred for Jews? Practically every non-Muslim politician in the Western world would line up to insist that neither one had anything to do with Islam. Yet al-Hammami held his views so vehemently that he told one woman: “I’d stomp on your head, wipe the floor with you, make you an example to others, and then divorce you.”

Wow! This guy really, deeply misunderstands Islam, right? Well, maybe not. The Qur’an teaches that men are superior to women and should beat those from whom they “fear disobedience”: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” (4:34)

Islamic tradition doesn’t make this picture any rosier. Muhammad’s child bride, Aisha, says in a hadith that Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: ‘Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?’” (Sahih Muslim 2127)

Another hadith states that a woman “wearing a green veil” came to Aisha and showed her a green bruise on her skin from her husband’s beatings. Aisha said to Muhammad: “I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!’” (Sahih Bukhari 7.77.5825)

In light of all that, it not surprising that al-Hammami gave this advice to a man who had gotten the idea that his wife was running him down to her boss, and was wondering if he should take her to task for it. Al-Hammami, playing marriage counselor, responded: “Yes, but first you have to stomp on her head, make her life miserable and make her taste the bitterness of what she did.”

Related: Iran Touts Islam's Teachings of Equality. Reality, As Always, Is Different.

Ever the charmer, al-Hammami even called a man a “coward and a scoundrel” for not violently beating his wife for talking to another man. Women, said al-Hammami, were “cheap meat devoured by anyone and everyone.”

The would be jihadi here had predictable views on other issues as well. According to an Israeli official, “his social media accounts [say] clearly that he has been radicalized into jihadist ideology. He talks about killing Jews.” Islamic tradition depicts Muhammad saying that Muslims can help bring about the end of days and the consummation of all things by killing Jews: “The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.’” (Sahih Muslim 2922)

These are the teachings of Islam that no one in the West wants to face. Muslims such as Hamam al-Hammami, however, will make sure that as many non-Muslims as possible face them.

https://pjmedia.com/robert-spencer/2026/10/04/stomp-on-her-head-flydubai-hijacker-shows-what-islam-really-thinks-of-women-n4957964?utm_source=twdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Whoops: Anti-Trump Outlet Boosts Trump's Accomplishment of 96% Reduction in Muslim Immigrants

Whoops: Anti-Trump Outlet Boosts Trump's Accomplishment of 96% Reduction in Muslim Immigrants

Whoops: Anti-Trump Outlet Boosts Trump's Accomplishment of 96% Reduction in Muslim Immigrants
AP Photo/Adam Gray

When an unabashedly anti-Trump outlet recently published a report on Muslim migration to the United States under President Trump, it must have seemed like the ultimate "gotcha" story. 

Instead, it is turning out to be more of a Republican campaign ad. Talk about an epic backfire.

The CATO Institute, a libertarian think tank that is about as open borders as it comes, published the report, "Legal Immigration from Majority-Muslim Nations Was Cut 96% Since 2024."

During his campaign in 2016, President Trump repeatedly proposed an outright ban on Muslims entering the United States. He then claimed that this policy idea morphed into the travel ban to avoid potential constitutional problems. During his 2024 campaign, he said he would bring back an even stricter ban than the one in his first term. He has succeeded. 

Data from the State Department through February 2026 show that the Trump administration has cut legal immigration by nationals of 45 majority-Muslim countries by 96 percent since December 2024. Monthly immigrant visa issuances and permanent lawful refugee admissions fell from 21,096 in December 2024 to 808 in February 2026. 

If you are looking for a major difference between Trump's second term and the Biden years, then look no further. 

The Trump administration's achievement was heralded by many conservatives on social media.

Of course, there were many conservatives that want the Trump administration to go further and deport as many of such foreigners as possible.

The CATO's Director of Immigration Studies was triggered by the right-wing blogosphere's attention.

"Thanks for citing my work. You are violating the law and harming Americans while making the country less safe, less free, and less prosperous," he claimed.

This may strike some CATO folks as an odd thought, but some of us don't want to live in an amorphous economic zone filled with valueless NPCs, we want to live an actual country that protects our rights and defends Western Civilization.

That is not going to happen when you flood the country with millions of people who don't subscribe to American values and have no interest in assimilating. The majority of these "refugees" are military age males, and plenty of them are on the taxpayer dole. So, spare us the lecture.

Moving on, Cato's country-by-country data show the biggest percentage reductions among major source countries included Afghanistan (99.8%), Uzbekistan (99.8%), Somalia (99.7%), Yemen (99.6%), Syria (99.5%), and Pakistan (97.9%), with similarly dramatic declines affecting countries across the Middle East, Africa and Asia. 

Afghans alone accounted for 27 percent of the overall reduction, falling from 5,563 legal immigrants and refugees in December 2024 to just nine in February 2026. Only Qatar, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates recorded increases, while Turkey had the smallest decline, at 8 percent.

Cato attributes the decline to a combination of Trump administration policies rather than one single order. Those include the suspension and restructuring of refugee admissions, an entry ban covering 40 countries, a State Department immigrant-visa pause covering 75 countries, suspension of the diversity visa lottery and an immigrant-visa interview freeze. 

According to Cato, 34 of the 45 majority-Muslim countries were specifically covered by either the entry ban or visa suspension.

The report says the reductions have been substantially larger for majority-Muslim countries than elsewhere. Legal immigration from those countries fell 96 percent, compared with 36 percent for other countries. Majority-Muslim countries represented 33 percent of the legal immigration measured in December 2024 but accounted for 57 percent of the overall reduction by February 2026. 

Cato estimates that, if February's pace were maintained, FY2026 would see roughly 40,000 immigrants and refugees from these countries, nearly 80 percent fewer than in 2024 and the lowest level in at least three decades. That seems like a win to many Americans who have "immigration fatigue."

For American citizens, and legal immigrants who want to keep the nation the way it was founded, this is welcome news. Cultural diversity has become a flimsy excuse to balkanize and divide the country. 

When immigrants no longer assimilate and increasingly force their customs and ideals onto the host country, you cannot blame some people for wanting a time out to assess why these foreigners even want to be here.

So, while CATO may have thought they were slamming Trump's immigration policy, they accidentally advertised one of this administration's biggest wins.

https://redstate.com/kyle-becker/2026/09/29/whoops-anti-trump-outlet-boosts-trumps-accomplishment-of-96-reduction-in-muslim-immigrants-n2207550?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Sen. Ron Johnson Holds a First-Of-Its Kind Exposure of What Happened in Hospitals During COVID-19

Sen. Ron Johnson Holds a First-Of-Its Kind Exposure of What Happened in Hospitals During COVID-19

Sen. Ron Johnson Holds a First-Of-Its Kind Exposure of What Happened in Hospitals During COVID-19
Greg Nash/The Hill via AP, Pool, File

On Monday, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) led a roundtable discussion on COVID-19 Hospital Protocols: Real Stories from Real People. 

Johnson was joined by patients, families, doctors, and other medical personnel who gave testimony as to the massive failures by hospitals and hospital systems in treating and caring for patients with COVID-19. Johnson shared that he had gathered 583 testimonies from 46 states, and the panelists represented a mere fraction of these testimonies. 

Panelists shared their personal accounts of mistreatment, disregard, cruelty, and the death-dealing experiences that occurred in hospitals across the country. From withholding requested care, administering treatments that were not authorized by the patient or the patient's advocate, and the cruel and heartless treatment given to people who either were not vaccinated against COVID-19 or who rejected Remdesivir or standard protocols, knowing the harm that they caused.

One common thread within every testimony was the forced and consistent administration of Remdesivir, which Johnson said nurses mockingly called, "Run, Death is Near." Another thread was the hospitals' refusal, despite patients' requests and insistence, to administer Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and monoclonal antibodies. The third thread was the practice of putting people on ventilators, despite the fact that they were showing improvement, and how in each case it ultimately ushered the patients more quickly to their deaths.

Peggy Hokett was the first to testify. She talked about how her husband, Raymond, was hospitalized in Oklahoma City and was told he was going to die because he was unvaccinated. Then they allegedly administered Remdesivir and placed him on a ventilator without consent. Raymond Hokett died 24 days later, allegedly because of the hospital's insistence on treating him as a lost cause rather than a patient who deserved proper care in order to be made better.

In his opening statement, Johnson said: 

There were leaders who used the fear of the unknown to gain undue power and control over our response to COVID.

[...]

Protocols that devastated people's lives and global economies. 

[...]

Rigid adherence to hospital protocols, rarely questioned, became the norm, which many doctors saw as violating the Hippocratic Oath's core duty: patients first, not protocols.

Far too often the stories of COVID hospitalizations were horrific, and we will hear some today. Patients lost their freedom. Family members could not visit and comfort their dying loved ones.

That is possibly the most cruel expression of that horrific period: the hospitals' refusal to allow families to be near their loved ones, or allow them the chance to say goodbye as they passed from this life.

Johnson continued:

In many of the testimonies received for this event, the callous comments by doctors and nurses to unvaccinated patients and their families are almost unbelievable. 

[...] 

Something other than the Coronavirus infected society during the pandemic. Something dark and deeply troubling. Not everyone was infected, but far too many were. The stories you are about to hear didn't occur within only one or two hospitals, but in hospitals across America.

WATCH:

Dr. James P. Miller, a former trauma surgeon from Everett, WA, gave his testimony, detailing the misconduct he says he witnessed in the hospital. These situations, some of which have been passed on anecdotally, were chillingly confirmed by Dr. Miller, including:

  • Protocols put in place that caused demonstrable harm and increased mortality. 
  • Medical leadership giving misleading and inaccurate information about Remdesivir, knowing full well the drug caused more harm than good.
  • The use of masks and PPE protocols dehumanized patients and staff. 
  • Patients who died from trauma and other causes were reported as COVID-19 deaths to boost the numbers.

Most damning: Dr. Miller said the head of the infectious disease department at the hospital where he resided said he was working with the state government to restrict the civil rights of unvaccinated people, including their ability to drive, by making their driver's license renewal contingent on their vaccination status.

WATCH: 

Cori Perth testified to the cruelty shown to her immunocompromised father when the family insisted that he be administered monoclonal antibodies, but the hospital allegedly refused and followed its own treatment protocols. She believes the hospital and staff's callousness, most probably because he was unvaccinated, ultimately resulted in his death while on a ventilator.

Through tears, Perth testified:

I'll never understand why they denied him the antibodies, why they were nasty and dismissive of our legitimate concerns, or why we weren't taken seriously, until I contacted a state legislator and filed an ethics complaint. And I will always wonder was it because he was unvaccinated.

WATCH:

Dr. Susan Rohr spoke and gave special thanks to the people sharing their testimony, as well as Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik, who formed the Front Line COVID Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance to help guide people and practitioners who wanted alternative ways to treat their patients. My husband and I were thankful for them as well when we contracted COVID in 2022, and used the FLCCC protocols to blunt the virus and heal quickly. 

Dr. Rohr testified that she suffered targeted attacks, censorship, and criticism for not following the medical protocols pushed by NIH's Anthony Fauci. Hospitals even allegedly refused to allow her to consult on cases or refer patients to her, despite the patients' request. Dr. Rohr worked to supply alternative treatments to patients, which saved their lives. 

Dr. Rohr said: 

My hope is that in the future we will never again allow rigid, mandated therapeutic protocols to be dictated by government entities but rather allow physicians to do their job clinically assessing and utilizing all the available tools to help patients during a medical crisis. We must never allow another lockdown scenario that deprives patients from therapeutic family visitation and a bedside advocate again. 

WATCH: 

In the almost four-hour roundtable, there were many heartbreaking testimonies that were incredibly difficult to listen to. Personally, it brought up the anger felt in the midst of that horrific period. Like a majority of Americans, we suffered great loss in the form of a dear friend dying after being placed on a ventilator, when he was showing improvement without it, and a cousin who delayed treatment because of COVID, and when he was finally able to get treatment, died on an operating table. Both were due to the misguided and cruel hospital protocols that disregarded the Hippocratic Oath's call to first do no harm. So, while viewing the hearing produced fresh waves of grief, what Sen. Johnson is doing is necessary and should be acknowledged and commended. 

This is the first Senate panel dedicated in its entirety to what occurred inside the hospitals in the midst of the COVID pandemic. Johnson promises that it will not be the last. Nor should it be. These stories must be kept at the forefront, never to be forgotten, and the government and health systems that colluded to bring this about must be held accountable. Let us hope Ron Johnson can continue in this advocacy for truth and give a voice to those who suffered damage and harm.

Johnson posted video of the full hearing here.

WATCH: