...from Obama admin'n hacks: "White House Advisers Give Three Different Numbers on 'Saved or Created' Jobs" (Berman Post):
"The most cynical view of the discrepancy between three top Obama advisers coming up with three different numbers of 'saved or created' jobs on the same day is that they could not agree on which made up number to use. It does not help that the range is from 'thousands and thousands' to 'more then two million. It may be the most cynical, but it is also the most logical; three of the top people came up with numbers that had a range of two million for what you would think would be a pretty strait forward question. The truth is that they do not know; no one knows, which may really be the whole point. It looks pretty amateurish though that they can not get on the same page and work with a consistent 'estimate'...
Read the rest:
http://www.bermanpost.com/2010/01/white-house-adviser-give-three.html
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31914.html
You mean like they did with Democrats to get a federal mandate to buy their insurance? Or when the unions got an exemption from the taxes that will get imposed on everyone else’s Cadillac tax? That particular accusation takes a truckload of chutzpah.
Besides, the White House once again misreads what people see as the national emergency. It isn’t the health-care system that wins support even from the majority of the uninsured — it’s the collapse of the job market. The health-care sector isn’t going to replace the 3.4 million jobs lost in the first year of the Obama administration. Voters in Massachusetts didn’t get angry because Congress hadn’t yet passed ObamaCare; they specifically sent the message that they wanted it dumped and to have Congress focus on the true national emergency. And Barack Obama signaled loud and clear today that he cares a lot more about pushing his radical agenda for government intervention than in listening to the voters.
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/24/wh-fumbling-the-obamacare-message/
No comments:
Post a Comment