THE WAY I SEE IT
by Don Polson Red
Bluff Daily News 5/22/2018
Candidates speak; anti-Trump plot
Local Republicans have had statewide candidates of our
party personally make their case for office. Gubernatorial candidates John Cox
and Travis Allen impressed attendees at the Republican Red, White and Blue
dinner in April. California Secretary of State candidate Mark Meuser found time
to make his pitch to the Republican Central Committee last Thursday. In both
instances, other candidates were contacted but their limited availability ruled
out appearing.
By my count there are 5 Republicans running for
Governor, out of a total of 27 names on the ballot. Allen and Cox seem to have
the most attention; Peter Liu’s name has also garnered some publicity, without
the fund raising of the top 2 names.
President Trump and Congressman LaMalfa have expressed
strong support for “Businessman/Taxpayer Advocate” John Cox; Assemblyman
Gallegher has strongly advocated for “California Assemblyman/Businessman”
Travis Allen. I would be happy to have either man win the election; I just hope
one of them can emerge out of California’s ludicrous “jungle primary” (designed
to marginalize Republicans out of the November ballot) and give our voters a
choice other than the “left or left-er” Democrat. Tehama County could vote 100
percent for anyone and be a rounding error among our state’s 10 to 14 million
voters. Still, it could happen.
I commend Mr. Meuser for his impassioned but rational
approach to the office of California Secretary of State. He has an irrefutable
case for restoring integrity and confidence to our state elections by removing
from the voter rolls “Those who are dead; Those who have moved; and Those who
are ineligible to vote pursuant to the California Constitution, such as
non-citizens.” He points to the “$4 per voter to send balloting materials…false
data on voter turnout…and the opportunity for fraud since California does not
require voter I.D.” Republican Raul Rodriquez, Jr. is also running for that
office.
Last week’s column ended with the words of New York
Post’s Paul Sperry, even more relevant a week later: “DEVEOPING: A major new
front is opening in the political espionage scandal. In summer 2016 Brennan
with his FBI liaison Strzok, along with help from Kerry @ State, were trying to
set Russian espionage traps for minor players in the Trump campaign through
cultivated Intel assets.”
This column is reticent to get ahead of the facts of
breaking scandal and corruption due to the inevitable emergence of “the rest of
the story.” However, consider the entire trajectory of charges, counter-charges
and revelations over the 2016 campaign, Russia’s interference, accusations of
collusion with the Trump campaign—and behind-the-scenes actual collusion
between the Clinton people, the DNC, a British ex-spy, real Russian sources and
the Mueller probe. All of that and more lends credibility to the widely
reported, unrefuted, disclosures of infiltration of “assets,” spies or
otherwise by Obama’s FBI/DOJ/CIA into the Trump campaign. A name has surfaced.
Bear in mind that the Democrat/media/Obama-ite complex
pounced on Donald Trump for stating that he was “wire tapped.” (Likewise, and
hypocritically, they echoed and cheered Obama when he ridiculed the idea that
Russians or anyone could interfere in, or affect, our election.) By the time it
was verified that Obama’s people secured FISA warrants to surveil, or spy on,
Carter Page and possibly others—which spying would necessarily have involved
Trump’s phone calls with Page—the news media caravan had moved on. No need to
correct that little bit of Trump-bashing failed narrative.
Just know that, regardless of the scant attention
given by the networks to this blockbuster of Watergate-scale (times 10) political
skullduggery, I have a good dozen articles in front of me containing tens of
thousands of words of reporting and analysis—none from fringe sources. The news
media could be giving this dawn-to-dusk attention but they choose not to for an
obvious reason: the white and black hats are on the wrong heads.
Given that Loretta Lynch cited a January 2017 meeting
in the White House over the need to conduct the ongoing probe of Russia/Trump
collusion “by the book”—together with references to having Barrack Obama in the
loop and involved in it all—it holds the potential of turning Obama et al into
Nixon and his “plumbers.” It was Obama’s fundraising operation that disabled
the filtering protocols, allowing unrestricted foreign contributions. It was
Hillary Clinton that oversaw $150+ million in contributions to the Clinton
Foundation while making decisions favoring contributors. But never mind all
that, right?
Trump’s tweets, with his 52 million followers, are
looking more and more like Reagan’s “going over the media’s heads.” Monday
morning, he quoted conservative author, and NYPD and secret service veteran Dan
Bongino: “[Obama’s CIA Director] John Brennan is panicking. He has disgraced
himself…the Country…(and) the entire Intelligence Community. He is the one man
who is largely responsible for the destruction of American’s (sic) faith in the
Intelligence Community and in some people at the top of the FBI. Brennan
started this entire debacle about President Trump.
“We now know that Brennan had detailed knowledge of the
(phony) Dossier…he denies knowledge of the Dossier, he briefs the Gang of 8 on
the Hill about the Dossier, which they then used to start an investigation
about Trump. It is that simple. This guy is the genesis of this whole Debacle.
This was a Political hit job. This was not an Intelligence Investigation.
Brennan has disgraced himself, he’s worried about staying out of Jail.”
Victoria Toensing: “There was a brazen plot to
get Hillary Clinton cleared from her clearly criminal culpability. And then if
she didn’t get elected, they would see to it that Donald Trump would have a
horrible presidency.” Democrats should ask themselves how they would feel if
President George Bush had orchestrated everything done to Trump, but to Barrack
Obama in 2008, before objecting.
No comments:
Post a Comment