Wednesday, September 2, 2020

Accentuating the Positive at the Republican Convention

Accentuating the Positive at the Republican Convention

Commentary
The Republican National Convention was barely halfway into its opening day when President Donald Trump materialized to deliver an hour-long speech.
Amazingly, because we have heard so many his orations long and longer, it was fun to watch and listen to, decidedly more interesting and content-filled than Joe Biden’s on the Democrats’ final night. Then, the primary takeaway was that the candidate had made it through without stumbling; the media declared that a triumph.
Be that as it may, no one in politics or in any of our lifetimes is a better extemporaneous speaker than Trump. People will point to others—Reagan, Clinton, Obama—all of whom have their points, but none of them would be competition for Trump.
He can move back and forth from serious to humorous with ease. If he ever wanted to, he would easily be the king of Late Night. No wonder Seth Meyers, Jimmy Kimmel, Stephen Colbert, et al., hate him so much. He’d eat their lunch.

Different Tones

But more importantly, from the outset, it was clear the dual (or is it dueling?) conventions demonstrated markedly different tones.
You could call the Democrats “medically gloomy”—they were banking on COVID-19 getting their man elected—and Republicans “optimistic, yet fed up.” They were optimistic about the future but fed up with the violence in the streets.
Speaking of “medically gloomy,” almost simultaneously with the Republican convention debut, Biden gave an interview in which he informed us he would “listen to the scientists” when it came to shutting down the country.
Which scientists, he didn’t say. Was it Dr. Anthony Fauci—director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases—who already has changed his mind about a half-dozen times? Or one of thousands of physicians—some epidemiologists, some not—who also have had opinions, many of which differed radically from Fauci’s (or whatever Fauci’s was at the moment)?
Biden—who, I would wager, wasn’t at the top of his class in chemistry or biology (he was at the bottom in law school, where he plagiarized)—isn’t the first person one would think of to make the necessary scientific determinations, but, hey, a Democratic candidate has to follow that “medically gloomy” line, just as Trump has to be enthusiastic about the FDA’s emergency approval of convalescent plasma.
It’s the old question of whether you’re a half-full or a half-empty person, and the Republicans are banking on the half-full side of the ledger. I’ll go with the former, too, but that’s my personality. I also happen to think that’s largely the American personality. We are at our best when optimistic. Everybody is, actually.
Optimism and pessimism tend to be self-fulfilling prophecies.
The first night of the Republican convention definitely accentuated the positive (but didn’t entirely eliminate negative… campaigning, that is. Why should they?)
“Celebrating America as the land of promise” were practically the first words of the narration that began the evening, just before the invocation by Cardinal Timothy Dolan that declared us, “One nation, under God.” That latter was, of course, somewhat different from the Democratic convention, at least in some instances, when the demiurge was notably missing from the Pledge of Allegiance.
Soon thereafter, Turning Point’s Charlie Kirk reminded us we should be “grateful, not angry, we live in the United States.”
Indeed.

Not a Racist

It was that kind of evening, with many moving speeches interspersed with some appearances by the president, most notable of which may have been when he was joined by several men and women who had been hostages in despotic countries such as North Korea and were freed by his administration.
Also memorable were a teacher inveighing against the teachers’ unions that restrict choice and Andrew Pollock, whose daughter was killed in the mass shooting at Stoneman Douglas High in Florida, speaking out passionately for the Second Amendment.
Cancer survivor Linda Hope must have driven the left crazy as an example of why socialized medicine is a dead end.
But the highlight of the evening was something that should put the fear of God in the hearts of Democrats, whether or not they are believers.
That was the several black people who supported Trump and who were more than willing to talk about the chokehold the Democratic Party has had on African Americans for half a century, what many correctly call plantation politics.
First came Kim Klacik, a young woman running for Congress from Baltimore. (You may have seen her terrific ad on the internet as she walks through her neighborhood.) She wants to make her long-benighted home city an example to the nation.
But then came the most powerful speaker of the night, in my view, former National Football League star-turned-businessman Herschel Walker. Walker, a black man, has known Trump for decades. He addressed the Democrats’ most sacred belief head on—that Trump is a racist. He looked square into the camera and denied it from the bottom of his heart.
“I have seen racism in my life and I know what it is, and it isn’t Donald Trump.”
Would you believe Walker or, say, Kamala Harris who accused her ticket partner of being both a racist and a sexual predator?
The other terrific speaker was Vernon Jones—a Democrat and Georgia state representative. He broke down that plantation ethic for the world to hear.
It’s hard to believe why any black people would vote Democratic anymore and this year maybe they won’t, at least to the extent they always have. We shall soon see.
After he said he was voting for Trump, Jones was threatened and asked to resign.
“The Democratic Party has become infected with intolerance,” he said.
That about sums it up.

Kamala Harris is an anti-Catholic bigot

Newt Gingrich: Kamala Harris is an anti-Catholic bigot

This says a lot about the strength of Biden's Catholic background under pressure from the anti-religious left

Harris’ record is perfectly clear. She is openly anti-Catholic in confirming federal judges, wanting to prosecute the Little Sisters of the Poor, closing Catholic Hospitals that don’t join her union allies, and favoring taxpayer-paid abortions up until birth (in fact, she has twice voted against bills that would ensure that babies who lived through abortion procedures get medical care).
In many ways, Harris’ bigotry against Catholics is a perfect example of the modern radical left’s ideology of “intolerant tolerance” that I outline in my latest bestselling book, “Trump and the American Future.”
The most explicit example of Harris’ anti-Catholic bigotry was her treatment of now-U.S. District Judge Brian Buescher during his Senate confirmation hearing.
Specifically, Harris questioned Buescher’s membership in the Knights of Columbus — a faith-based charitable organization that feeds the poor, assists in disaster relief around the globe, provides scholarships for struggling students, helps refugees fleeing violence and persecution, and carries out a host of other philanthropic efforts.

More from Opinion

Because the organization is Catholic, its leadership has opposed abortion and gay marriage on religious grounds. Harris needled Buescher on these two issues and insinuated that his membership in the organization (and ultimately his Catholic faith) should bar him from the bench.
Harris was eerily mirroring the bigoted questioning by Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., of now-7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett during her confirmation hearing in 2017.
As Alexandra DeSanctis wrote for the National Review: “Buescher eventually was confirmed ... but the fact remains that Harris was guilty of reprehensible anti-Catholic bigotry, and there’s no reason to believe her views have changed.”
At the time, The Wall Street Journal raised a key question: “Ms. Harris’s embrace of religious intolerance is especially significant because in two years she could be the next U.S. President. What does it say about today’s Democrats that no one in the party of Al Smith and JFK sees fit to rebuke her?”
Harris is also part of a larger trend of anti-Catholic bigotry raging across the country.
Harris’ unconstitutional religious test for judicial service is just one example. Her anti-Catholic bigotry extended to vigorous support for prosecuting the Little Sisters of the Poor, a group of nuns that provides food and shelter to poor senior citizens across the world. Biden and Harris have said they would seek to bring the nuns back to court to force them to cover the cost of insuring contraceptives and abortion drugs to people working in their health care facilities.
The U.S. Supreme Court has already affirmed the Little Sisters’ First Amendment rights, yet the Biden-Harris team wants to relitigate the case.
Furthermore, as attorney general of California, Harris used her office’s power to close a number of Catholic hospitals on behalf of her political ally, the Service Employee International Union.
Six Catholic Daughters of Charity-run hospitals in California were driven to insolvency by onerous union contracts and sparse Medicaid payments. A larger health care system had bid to buy the hospitals and assume its liabilities. However, the SEIU opposed the deal because it wanted an agreement to be able to organize workers in every one of the buyer’s 15 other hospitals as part of the sale of the six Catholic hospitals.
In California, the attorney general has the power to OK or nix acquisitions of nonprofit hospitals. Attorney General Harris was happy to put six hospitals out of business for her union allies.
Harris added a multitude of unprecedented staffing requirements and specific medical service requirements to the sale. Naturally, her malicious meddling killed the sale, leaving thousands of employees out of work and potentially millions of residents without nearby hospitals.
As The Wall Street Journal editorial board warned: “Hospital workers, patients and taxpayers paid a fearsome price for Ms. Harris’s intervention on behalf of the SEIU. As troubling was Ms. Harris’s use of her authority to help a political supporter and punish a business she didn’t like. She was in the vanguard of the new progressive state AGs who use prosecutorial power against opponents. Watch for this in the Harris Administration.”
Harris is also part of a larger trend of anti-Catholic bigotry raging across the country. This disturbing trend prompted Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., this week to urge Attorney General William Barr to ramp up prosecution efforts against vandalism and other attacks.
As the Catholic News Agency reported: “In recent weeks, several Catholic churches have faced attacks and acts [of] desecration. Last month, church in Ocala, Florida was set aflame while parishioners inside prepared for morning Mass. A California mission founded by St. Junipero Serra was also burned in a fire and is being investigated as an arson case, while several statues of Serra have also been pulled down. A statue of the Virgin Mary was beheaded at a parish in Chattanooga, Tennessee. In Boston, a statue of Mary was set on fire, and in Brooklyn, a statue was tagged with the word 'IDOL' in black spray paint.”
The consequences of Harris’ openly anti-Catholic bias will be felt as other anti-Catholics draw encouragement from her bigotry to increase the activism and intensity of their assaults on Catholic institutions and Catholic personalities. If left unchecked, it will doubtlessly spread to attacks on other religious people and organizations that don’t hold to radical Democratic ideology.
So, this bigot is the person Biden thinks should be next in line to be president. This says a lot about the strength of his own Catholic background under the pressure of the atheist and anti-religious left.

Tuesday, September 1, 2020

Black Man Stabbed 'Random' White AutoZone Employee in the Neck After Watching Police Shooting Videos

Black Man Stabbed 'Random' White AutoZone Employee in the Neck After Watching Police Shooting Videos

Mugshot of Jayvon Hatchett, suspect in an AutoZone stabbing.
On Tuesday morning, a 19-year-old black man in Columbus, Ga., allegedly entered an AutoZone and stabbed a white employee in the neck. Police arrested the suspect, Jayvon Hatchett, on Wednesday. At his arraignment Thursday morning, Hatchett reportedly said he decided to stab a “random” white man after watching videos of police shootings.
“Jayvon Hatchett stabbed Auto Zone employee 7 times after ‘watching Facebook videos of police shootings,'” WLTZ News reporter Robbie Watson posted on Facebook after the arraignment. “Hatchett smiles telling Detective he chose white man at random and stabbed him in the neck. Victim’s critical and traumatized by attack according to court testimony.”
While the story sounds outlandish, Watson has stood by her story. Police said the victim apparently had no connection to Hatchett. Authorities said the victim is in critical condition but is expected to make a recovery.
Witnesses at the store say Hatchett ran from the scene after stabbing the victim.
The stabbing follows multiple episodes of looting and rioting in cities across America, from Portland and Seattle to Chicago and Kenosha, Wisc., ostensibly inspired by protests against police brutality following police shootings of black people.
Yet when rioters began looting in Minneapolis on Wednesday night, they did so after a black man died not at the hands of police but by his own hand. The man had reportedly shot someone and was fleeing from police at the time of his suicide. It appears that rumors of a police shooting inspired widespread looting and the lawless mob did not bother to investigate the details first.
In other words, a Black Lives Matter mob victimized innocent businesses, damaging the livelihoods not just of business owners but also the livelihoods of their employees, due to a misleading rumor. Not only did the business owners and employees have nothing to do with the alleged injustice, but there was no police shooting to protest in the first place.
Think of that: lawless people were so anxious to wreak havoc on their neighbors in the name of justice that they did not even bother to check whether there was injustice in the first place.
Yet the stabbing in Columbus, Ga., is even more terrifying. While looters and rioters intend to destroy the property and livelihoods of their neighbors in the name of justice, it appears Jayvon Hatchett attempted to murder a “random” white man in the name of taking revenge for police shootings.
The victim’s only crime was being white. Jayvon Hatchett could have targeted any white person at any store, and it seems it just so happened that he picked AutoZone and this poor employee.
This kind of wanton stabbing is the exact recipe for a race war. If black people, in the name of Black Lives Matter, stab white people merely for the color of their skin, their movement has ceased to be about justice or equality. The Marxist leaders of the movement have already indicated that they are after a revolution, but this may be even more terrifying. Americans support police reform, but they do not want a Marxist revolution or a race war.
The Black Lives Matter movement needs to vocally condemn Jayvon Hatchett.

'I am 100% Antifa': Alleged Portland shooter was previously arrested—and released—for bringing illegal loaded gun to a riot

The man being investigated by police in the fatal shooting of a Trump supporter in Portland identifies as Antifa and is an ardent Black Lives Matter supporter.


The man being investigated by police in the fatal shooting of a Trump supporter in Portland identifies as Antifa and is an ardent Black Lives Matter supporter. Michael Forest Reinoehl was previously arrested at an Antifa riot in July and charged with illegally possessing a loaded firearm and other crimes. He was let go and the charges were never pursued. He allegedly went on to kill Aaron "Jay" Danielson on Saturday night in downtown Portland.
The Oregonian was first to report that Reinoehl, 48, is being investigated by Portland police for the homicide. He has not been formally named or charged.
In the early hours of July 5 during the start of violent Antifa and Black Lives Matter riots outside the Mark O. Hatfield federal courthouse, Reinoehl was cited for possessing a loaded gun in a public place, resisting arrest, and interfering with police. He was photographed at the time fighting cops while on the ground. A gun laid on the ground next to him. He was cited, released and spent no time in the county jail. Like for the majority of those arrested at riots, local prosecutors did not pursue the charges.
Source: Portland Police
Danielson, the homicide victim, was shot in the chest in downtown Portland just before 9 p.m. by a man believed to be Reinoehl, who fled the scene on foot. Video recorded of the shooting shows Danielson lying motionless on the ground immediately after two shots are fired. He wore a “blue lives matter”-style patch on his clothes at the time of his death. He was a participant in the “Trump 2020” car caravan that drove in and around Portland and was an associate of Portland-area conservative group, Patriot Prayer.
When part of the caravan arrived in downtown earlier in the evening, Antifa rioters confronted the drivers by throwing rocks, eggs and other projectiles. In response, pro-Trump drivers and passengers were seen shooting them with paintballs and spraying them with pepper spray. Some rioters tried to physically block cars from driving in the road using their bodies or other barriers.
Aaron "Jay" Danielson was shot dead in downtown Portland by an alleged Antifa militant
Katie Daviscourt, a Seattle conservative activist, knew Danielson. "He wasn’t a violent type. [He] just loved this country and our president," she tells The Post Millennial.
Reinoehl has an extensive social media history that shows he identifies as Antifa and has been at many of the riots in Portland. He posted frequently about Black Lives Matter and even has a tattoo of the "black power" fist on his neck.
The shooter in downtown Portland shortly before the killing
On Instagram, Reinoehl posted in June: "Every revolution needs people that are willing and ready to fight. There are many of us protesters that are just protesting without a clue of where that will lead. That's just the beginning that's where the fight starts. If that's as far and you can take it thank you for your participation but please stand aside and support the ones that are willing to fight. I am 100% ANTIFA all the way! I am willing to fight for my brothers and sisters! Even if some of them are too ignorant to realize what antifa truly stands for."
He continued: "We are currently living through a crucial point in Humanities evolution. We truly have an opportunity right now to fix everything. But it will be a fight like no other! It will be a war and like all wars there will be casualties."
Reinoehl also touted his military experience and desire for armed conflict: "I was in the army and hated it. I did not feel like fighting for them would ever be a good cause. Today's protesters and antifa are my brothers in arms. This is a Cause to fight for This truly is fighting for my country!"
Michael Reinoehl posted frequently at the Antifa riots in Portland on Instagram
Portland has been the focus of nearly 100 days of continuous violence organized by Antifa and far-left activists. Multiple public buildings have been smashed, broken into and set on fire since late May.

Livestream video recorded soon after the shooting on Saturday shows Antifa black bloc militants outside the Justice Center celebrating Danielson’s death by dancing and cheering. Some Antifa accounts on Twitter had earlier wrongly claimed that a "fascist" killed one of their black comrades.

“He was a f*cking Nazi! Our community held its own, and took out the trash,” shouted a woman on a bullhorn. The crowd cheered in response.
Reinoehl is believed to still be at-large. He currently has a warrant for his arrest for an unrelated incident involving illegal street racing in eastern Oregon.

New Poll Is GREAT News for the Trump Campaign

New Poll Is GREAT News for the Trump Campaign

AP Photo/Evan Vucci
According to Rasmussen, more voters align with President Trump on the major issues facing the nation than his opponent, Joe Biden. A survey of likely voters this week showed that 40% identify with the president’s views, and 34% say Biden’s are closer to their own.
The party breakdown is also interesting and may explain the enthusiasm gap between the candidates. Seventy percent of Republicans say Trump’s views on major issues are closest to their own. Only 57% of Democrats say the same of Biden.
This result may be a reflection of the apparent fracture in the Democrat coalition between moderates and the progressive left. It would be interesting to understand where the disconnect is for the remaining 43% of Democrats. It may be that Biden has gone too far to the left for some moderates. Alternately, the Bernie Bros may think he is not progressive enough.
CNN Poll Shows Trump Closing the Gap With Biden and Has More Enthusiasm from Supporters
This outcome matched closely with voter enthusiasm for their candidate. In a recent CNN poll, 67% of Trump’s voters are voting for him, and 58% of Biden’s voters are voting against Trump, not for Joe. This imbalance is generally a troubling statistic for challengers of an incumbent. Historically, it does not turn out voters on Election Day.
The poll also shows a transition occurring in the Republican Party. The Trump agenda has challenged some typical Republican positions. The president has used tariffs as a negotiating tool frequently, reversed several foreign policy positions, and has questioned post-Cold War alliances.
These moves, along with Trump’s occasionally boorish rhetoric, have driven some establishment Republicans to leave the party or throw their support to Joe Biden. Voters seem to be adjusting to this. The number of GOP voters who think it is important for Trump to keep other elected Republicans on his side has fallen six points since July of 2018, to 50%.
Those who think the president needs to pursue his own agenda increased nine points over the same period. This shift may have to do with the increasing recognition of the threat posed by China and support for Trump’s approach. It could also have to do with increased messaging aimed at middle- and working-class voters.
Bush 43 Alumni Supporting Biden Have Turned Their Backs on Conservatism
The Trump coalition is not the traditional Buckley-Reagan coalition. While that bargain worked for over fifty years, the post-Cold War consensus did not work out as well for average Americans. Jobs and wealth moved overseas, and both Democrats and Republicans built a global system. Democrats also made a turn toward the very wealthy, a traditional Republican constituency, during the Clinton administration.
As these lines continue to shift, it is likely the priorities of the Republican Party will also continue to change. While it appears the GOP is now the party of founding ideals, freedom of speech, and federalism, policy prescriptions may continue to move in the America First direction to ensure the prosperity and security of the average American. This shift has already caused a sea change in foreign policy.
Despite the pandemic, the economic shutdown, and the constant negative media coverage, the number of voters who believe the Trump presidency will be seen as a success has gone up. Since 2018 it has increased from 36% to 40%. This increase is pretty stunning, given the constant turmoil of 2020.
In any case, the Trump campaign is resonating with a larger share of voters than the Biden campaign. This fact appears to be linked to the Trump agenda on significant issues. Whatever modifications this has brought to the traditional Republican views, it seems to be working. It also indicates the bubbles in D.C. and New York City may be in for another surprise.

Don's Tuesday Column


          THE WAY I SEE IT   by Don Polson   (530) 515-2137   Red Bluff Daily News   9/01/2020
Dems are toast, but don’t get cocky

This is not an encouraging message—Democrats are all but toast—for local progressive partisans who may have thought their “convention in little boxes” was cheerful, profound or even mildly persuasive to anyone outside their ever-shrinking tent. If you don’t talk to anyone that supports President Trump, have only fellow leftists in your circle of acquaintances, watch only CNN, MSNBC, the networks and PBS—this would obviously come as a shock suggesting delusion on our side.

Predictions being a bit tricky, the path to reelection holding obstacles for Trump, and with polling suggesting a solid Biden/Harris lead, you still must consider whether Dems have a Dukakis or Mondale level landslide defeat on their horizon. Or will Biden recreate Clinton’s upset of a sitting Republican president? The former is, to this writer, a near certainty.

Taking polls at face value, Biden’s double-digit lead has been cut nearly in half; “Early Polling Finds Trump Getting a Convention Bounce,” (P. Mirengoff, Powerlineblog.com). Ironically, Trump runs as both an underdog and an anti-status quo cheerleader for America, for law and order, for economic recovery and for renewed normalcy post-pandemic.

Polling by Morning Consult and YouGov have Biden’s lead falling from 10 and 9 points to 6 points in each poll. Rasmussen and Zogby both found approval trending up, even over 50 percent. In the Hill-HarrisX poll, Trump’s approval is 24 percent among Black voters, and 32 percent among Hispanic voters. If he gets near that in the election, the popular vote majority—together with an Electoral College landslide—will not only affirm Trump’s place in history, but will also keep the U.S. Senate in, and return the House majority to, Republican control.

To Democrats and the news media (a redundancy), higher network and cable viewership for the DNC vs. the RNC reflected their reality, but then the blowout numbers for streaming viewers (we streamed CSPAN for every minute) favoring the RNC gave a 26 million viewer edge to the Republicans. Money talks as well, with $6 million more going to Trump than to Biden. 
  
The media predictably expressed adulation for the DNC, platitudes for Biden’s ho-hum reading (without losing his place and only a few mumbles), and endless, ad nauseum descriptions of the Republican convention as “dark.” The Democrats seemed to think Hollywood star power, together with Trump-demonization, was the ticket to the hearts and minds of Americans. The Republicans simply provided actual Americans with hearts and minds and stories of inspiration, overcoming hardships, rising to leadership, embracing hope, opportunity and accomplishment. Dems sealed their fate.

To the many local Catholic voters, look up and consider whether “Kamala Harris is an anti-Catholic bigot,” as Newt Gingrich persuasively writes at Foxnews.com, 8/15. Dem mouthpieces offer overly-fierce defenses of Joe Biden’s “devout” Catholic faith, but he favors 1) abortion up to the moment of delivery, 2) forcing Catholic nuns and charities to subsidize abortion services for employees, and 3) forcing Catholic adoption agencies to place children with same-sex couples.

Harris’ record includes: 1) confirming openly anti-Catholic federal judges, 2) prosecuting Little Sisters of the poor, 3) closing Catholic Hospitals that don’t join her union allies, 4) favoring taxpayer-paid abortions up until birth and 5) denying medical care to babies that have survived an abortion procedure.

Ironically, Kamala Harris unintentionally helped to overturn California’s magazine ban by referring, as CA Attorney General, to a 2017 study finding minorities are less likely to call 911 in an emergency. She was quoted by name by a 9th Circuit judge who reasoned that limiting the size of a gun magazine would disproportionately impact rural and minority gun owners’ self-defense.

Read “How Biden Just Blew Up the Claim That He’s an Honest, Decent Guy,” by John Lott (Townhall.com, 8/21). While Joe Biden’s character was praised by convention speakers, he displayed a mean, disingenuous side, saying that Trump defended “white supremacists and white nationalists” as “fine people” after the 2017 riots in Charlottesville. Multiple fact-checkers affirm Trump only referred to the “fine people” on “both sides” of removing a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee. Joe Biden lied.

Biden also told two whoppers in an interview with NBC’s Andrea Mitchell. Saying that Trump “screwed up” the good economy he inherited from Obama, simply defies the facts. The unemployment rate, which dropped after the financial crash to 4.7 % at the end of Obama’s term, continued to drop to 3.6 % just before the Wu-flu hit and politicians shut down the economy. Moreover, the average GDP growth under Obama (after the recession ended in June, 2009) was about 2.2 %; GDP growth under Trump (prior to pandemic-induced shutdowns) was about 2.5 %; that’s not “screwing up.”

“In Just 72 Hours, Joe Biden Might Have Paved the Way for the Democratic Party to be Totally Screwed in 2020,” by Matt Vespa (Townhall.com, 8/22), points to Biden’s answer to ABC’s David Muir. Biden: “I would shut it (the economy) down. I would listen to the scientists.” Compare: Republican Gov. Kristi Noem kept South Dakota open, urged cautious practices, maintaining economic health—1-2 deaths/day; New Zealand imposed a confine-everyone-to-home lockdown for months, destroying their economy, minimizing deaths but reopening brings Wu-flu resurgence. Uganda: open economy, over-the-counter HCQ, 30 deaths.

Proving Reagan’s adage that “liberals aren’t ignorant, they just know so many things that aren’t so,” Post Office protesters Ms. McIver and Ms. Gehrung stated things that simply aren’t so (DN, 8/24). There has been no “manipulation,” no “recent changes made to remove collection boxes and sorting machines around the country…to slow down the mail service.” Go back to last Tuesday’s column and review the seven factual points I made refuting the hoax that Trump and DeJoy are “slowing the USPS to sabotage…mail-in voting.”

The Media And The Violent Protesters Have Something In Common

The Media And The Violent Protesters Have Something In Common

Media depiction of protesters and law enforcement/AP featured image
A protester speaks with a Park Police officer standing guard with a line of police closing off off the area around Lafayette Park near the White House after protesters tried to topple a statue of Andrew Jackson in the park in Washington, early Tuesday, June 23, 2020. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)

In the media over the last few days, we’ve begun to notice that certain Democratic politicians and journalists have done a complete 180 and are now condemning the violent protests taking place in large cities.
The violence, destruction, looting, and general mayhem have become regular occurrences in several bigger cities across the nation, and the Democratic Party may finally be starting to feel some pressure to calm their voters down. Don Lemon gave away the game recently when he said on air that it was starting to “show up in the polling“, and other progressive voices have started given some lackluster statements on the subject.
It took them a long time to do it, and our media, in particular, has been very hesitant to address the violence. Part of the reason for that is their overcommitment to every progressive cause if it is one that opposes Republicans (and Trump specifically).
Do you know what our national press has in common with the protesters who come into these cities and start destroying things?
It’s not that our media is filled with a bunch of violent anarchists, but that they have no real idea how to address the issues that the legitimate protesters are raising awareness for. The vast majority (of the rioters and the national press) are privileged white people who have never really put any thought into how to change things. All they know is that they believe the system is broken beyond repair and must be torn down.
But both groups have little frame of reference, having paid only scant attention to history and believe that violent demonstration is right and just in creating change. It’s easy for folks in the media and activists to say “Well, America was founded on bloody revolution!” It’s much harder to say “America gained independence through a bloody revolution, but the fight for actual rights and the establishment reforming the government to something that better represented its people came through dialogue and compromise.”
Part of it has to do with the fact that many of these folks are white and privileged and they feel an immense sense of guilt over it. For the anarchists, they want to use their privilege to help tear down the society that they see as being unjust but they have no endgame. For the media, they have a platform, but are so scared of criticizing anyone that they will accept what’s going on in the name of racial justice.
Neither group is actually doing the peaceful protesters any real favors, as more and more the peaceful movement gets co-opted and the true meaning of the moment is lost in the rubble of businesses that provided jobs and income to many of the black citizens seeking change.
Journalists have realized sooner, though, that these violent demonstrations are bad, and they are backtracking. But, it’s painfully obvious as to why. It’s not that they think it’s truly the wrong thing for these anarchists to be doing, it’s that it could help Donald Trump win. Much like their scramble to support the protests to make themselves feel better, a lot of the reaction now is for all the wrong reasons. Now, it’s about the political outcome, not the social outcome.
The behavior of the journalists and the anarchists is inherently selfish, because it’s based on doing what they think is best for the peaceful protesters and not actually done by listening to those protesters. Now that the polling is an issue, some will backtrack. But all that shows is that they still don’t get it.