Tuesday, August 30, 2022

Don's Tuesday Column

    HE WAY I SEE IT   by Don Polson   Red Bluff Daily News   8/30/2022

Corruption, the “raid,” student loans


First, the so-called “cancelling” of $10,000-20,000 of loans for non-Pell, and Pell grant students has generated tens of thousands of words of commentary, much of which was read for this column. The bottom line is that anything written or spoken in support of White House Occupant Joe Biden’s unconstitutional giveaway is so loaded with erroneous and fallacious reasoning as to be the definition of “disinformation.”


Hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars will be “spent” without congressional authorization, in perhaps the largest, most egregious, most politically offensive election-year gimmick in history. The benefiting demographic is the group most likely to be indoctrinated into voting Democrat. Co-inkee-dink?


At around $300 billion for the low-end cost of loan “forgiveness,” and up to $600+ billion, each taxpayer is basically on the hook for between $2,000 and $6,000 over the course of the program. Working, taxpaying Americans who never went to college, or attended on borrowed (but repaid) money—or even money they saved from their jobs—will be paying either through taxes, or inflation.


Regular writer of inestimable wisdom, Joe Neff, has explained what untold numbers of college and university students have done to pay for, or repay, the cost of earning a degree. Whether for a genuinely marketable degree, a truly useless degree (except as a highly-credentialed restaurant worker), or for one of many “trades”—barber, cosmetology, personal care or other skills—the best lesson for wannabe students would be to see a loan for what it’s worth in income, nothing more.


The default rate ranges from around 1 percent (law or medical) to 30-40 percent for some of the “trades” training. The hard reality is that someone always pays for a loan: Either the borrower when it’s repaid, or the lender if a student reneges on their obligation. Note that the cost of higher education has ballooned beyond inflation for decades with no underlying cause—costs of purchased products or services—while administration employees now exceed the number of those actually teaching. “Loan cancelling” =higher fees.


Does anyone think that a student relieved of debt will not sign up for a car loan or lease, save up for a down payment, or splurge on vacations? Of course they will, rather than buying used cars, taking public transit, sharing rent, and foregoing cruises or travel while repaying their college loans. The most efficacious change to the whole process would be to make the college, university (with 10s of billions of endowment dollars), or trade schools cosigners to the student loans. Let them assume some risk. ‘Nuff said.


The immense corruption in the electoral process dwarfs what can be written here. From the Covid (and prior) mail-in ballot rules—despite the ease of fraudulent voting noted by Jimmy Carter—allowing widespread “vote trafficking” (always illegal) and “harvesting” (illegal in most states);


To the $400 million+ in “Zuck bucks” spent in Democrat areas in swing states, giving control of election boards to leftist partisans in schemes to maximize (only) Democrat turnout, later found illegal in Wisconsin;


To the corrupt ways the FBI induced Facebook to suspect “Russian disinformation” in the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, “meaningfully” reducing the laptop story’s influence (Twitter’s total ban likewise); To the now-exposed decision by FBI higher-ups to tell agents to give no credence to the laptop story.


It all influenced large numbers of Democrats to vote for Biden, who wouldn’t have had they known; and it would have given Trump wins in all 6 of the swing states. The election of Joe Biden was an artificial result that capped the previous 4+ years of propaganda, media and Democrat lies, forged documents, unfounded accusations and impeachments.


While some influencers on our side wish to reserve judgement on the Mar-a-Lago raid and seizure of Donald Trump’s rightfully possessed documents, there is no such reticence here. The time for such deference to the FBI, Magistrate Judge Reinhardt, and legal panelists is now past. Reinhardt had no authority to sign off on the search (he is not, repeat not, a Federal Judge); from the start it was an illegal raid.


The search warrant itself was so broad, it can only be viewed as another “Russia, Russia, Russia” hoax, an illegal “general warrant-level” fishing expedition. It referred to any and all documents Trump possessed from his inauguration to his term’s end; it lacked any recognition of prior cooperation nor did it reflect the prior lack of urgency over supposedly “top secret,” even “nuclear weapons” papers. Look up Lenin’s security chief Beria, who infamously said, “Show me the man and I will show you the crime.”


Anyone asserting 1) that Donald Trump lacked the authority and right to all that he took from the White House as President, or 2) that having “classified” markings refutes Supreme Court, and Presidential Records Act, validation of his sole authority to declassify—is just blowing smoke and peddling horse manure. When President Donald J. Trump pronounced his to-be-transferred documents “declassified,” they were so deemed.


The heavily redacted, released affidavit proves that if there was a single indictable crime, it would have been unredacted, if only to keep Trump supporters at bay. Doubt me at the risk of being exposed as either ignorant of the corruption at the heart of nearly 6-years of fruitless persecution, or being a willing, gullible partisan that cares not one whit for facts and the truth. It becomes clearer by the day that the only way to excise the banal, vicious, unconstitutional, one-sided, despotic abuse that has become entrenched in Washington, D.C. is to send Donald J. Trump back there in 2024.

Corruption of Climate Science Supported by Flawed Models

Corruption of Climate Science Supported by Flawed Models

(AP Photo/LM Otero)

Imagine the theory of gravity being determined by a partisan vote. Or a group of politicians ruling on interpretations of the laws of modern physics. As bizarre as those propositions sound, that is what is happening in climate science.

Scientific research is done predominantly in academia, where truth is supposedly established through years of work that is financially supported by government or private entities. Sometimes, the financiers of research desire particular outcomes for their money.

Human nature being what it is, ulterior motives creep into researchers’ methods and results when scientists applying for grants and working in laboratories discover the point of view of their funding sources. A sort of predeterminism arises where the funder’s interests are given priority over time-proven scientific methodologies.

There are large factions of politicians and scientists committed to a baseless narrative that emissions of carbon dioxide from human activity are leading to an apocalyptic warming of Earth. With the enthusiasm of religious zealots and the ruthlessness of the power-mad, a climate industrial complex is driving energy policy on the basis of a hundred or so badly flawed computer models. More than 95% of these digital prognosticators have proven unreliable in predicting climatic trends. Yet they are used anyhow.

In simple terms, the models are designed to exaggerate the potency of atmospheric carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas. Consequently, the models overstate future warming. The magnification of forecasted warming is revealed by retrospectively comparing model results to actual, historical temperatures.

2020 scientific analysis revealed that “models overpredict warming in every target observational analog, in most cases significantly so, and the average differences between models and observations are statistically significant.”

Scientist Ross McKitrick calls out errors of modelers that exaggerate future temperature increases.

“I get it that modeling the climate is incredibly difficult, and no one faults the scientific community for finding it a tough problem to solve,” writes McKitrick. “But we are all living with the consequences of climate modelers stubbornly using generation after generation of models that exhibit too much surface and tropospheric warming, in addition to running grossly exaggerated forcing scenarios.” (Forcing is the mechanism by which greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere.)

“Back in 2005 in the first report of the then-new U.S. Climate Change Science Program, (others) pointed to the exaggerated warming in the tropical troposphere as a ‘potentially serious inconsistency,’” McKitrick says. “But rather than fixing it since then, modelers have made it worse. (The report writers) note that in addition to the wrong warming trends themselves, the biases have broader implications because ‘atmospheric circulation trends depend on latitudinal temperature gradients.’”

Related: Europe Is Paying the Price for Embracing Environmentalism With Religious Fervor — and It’s a Lesson the U.S. Can Stand to Learn

Why do researchers continue to use models that are known to exaggerate warming? To produce outcomes that support a view politically popular with the climate obsessed?

It would seem so, given the profit motive and the lucrative nature of the current pernicious cycle: Governments advance their doomsday narrative, scientists and research institutions get grants, the green lobby secures investments and subsidies for uneconomic and ineffective technologies, and political candidates embrace the hysteria in exchange for campaign contributions.

This is all supported by working people who pay excessive taxes and unnecessarily high energy bills. Some employed in the fossil fuel industry pay with the loss of their livelihoods. The price for the poorest among us — particularly in the developing world — may be lives lost through further impoverishment and early death.

Some climate warmists may be ignorant of science’s corruption. However, others cynically take advantage of it for money and power. At some point, this façade will collapse because of the lack of reality behind it. Nevertheless, we are obligated to do what we can to accelerate the falsehood’s dismantlement if only to honor sacrifices made by others in the name of truth.

In the 16th century, Martin Luther freed millions from the tyranny of a corrupt church by refusing to recant what he knew to be true. He managed to avoid torture and death by fire for his alleged heresies. Others were not so fortunate.

Yet our obligation is deeper than memorializing the past. As Luther’s biographer, Eric Metaxas, writes: “In the end, what Luther did was not merely to open a door in which people were free to rebel against their leaders but to open a door in which people were obliged by God to take responsibility for themselves.”

Those who recognize the wrong can do no other than to point it out. And so we do.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/gregory-wrightstone/2022/08/20/corruption-of-climate-science-supported-by-flawed-models-n1622586

Monday, August 29, 2022

FAUCI’S LONG GOODBYE

FAUCI’S LONG GOODBYE

BY SCOTT JOHNSON IN ADMINISTRATIVE STATECORONAVIRUS

At age 81, the fallacious Dr. Anthony Fauci is living proof that self-love can’t kill you. If self-love could kill you, Dr. Fauci would be pushing up daisies instead of basking in the glow of his bottomless self-regard. His official motto — “La Science, c’est moi” — is fit for a king.

Students of ancient history may recall that only last month Fauci contemplated leading the NIAID and advising President Biden until the end of “the Biden administration term,” as he put it in an interview with Politico. The good news was that he would be leaving. The bad news was that his leaving was long overdue. The funny news was that he gave himself room to stick around in case Biden were to leave office early. He intended to stick around until “the end of President Joe Biden’s term,” as Politico put it.

Something happened. Yesterday Dr. Fauci released a statement announcing that he would step down from his NIAID and White House positions in December. He must anticipate the arrival of a post-election Republican majority in at least one chamber of Congress.

Politico quoted Fauci last month:

“We’re in a pattern now. If somebody says, ‘You’ll leave when we don’t have Covid anymore,’ then I will be 105. I think we’re going to be living with this,” Biden’s chief medical adviser said when asked whether he is staying in his role out of a sense of obligation.

He’s not. But his assessment, that we’ll live with Covid-19 for many years to come, is a startling admission from the longtime infectious disease expert who said the country could flatten the curve and achieve herd immunity, first through social distancing and then vaccination.

In his July 18 Wall Street Journal Best of the Web column James Freeman anticipated Fauci’s announcement yesterday (emphasis added):

If Dr. Fauci lives to be 105 he will likely never be able to undo the damage that Covid policies inflicted on America’s children. He promoted shutdown policies that isolated them from friends, opportunities and care, saddled them with trillions of dollars in federal debt and—due to degraded education—reduced their future earnings. He never could have sold lockdowns in 2020 if he had said then what’s he’s saying today about the long-term presence of Covid.

Even in the spring of 2020 there was ample reason to question the wisdom of lockdowns, and many of us did. There was ample evidence that kids faced little risk from Covid and that schools would not be the superspreaders of media lore. There was also ample reason to focus on protecting the vulnerable rather than turning society upside down. Dr. Fauci’s endorsement of school closures while freely acknowledging he did not have a thorough understanding of the harms should be a lesson in schools of public health on the need to avoid panicked responses to future viruses.

This column will go out on a limb and predict that if Republicans take one or both houses of Congress this fall—gaining oversight authority and subpoena power—Dr. Fauci will be leaving long before Jan. 20, 2025.

I would like to say that goodbye is too good a word, so I’ll just say fare the well, but farewell is too good a word too.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/08/faucis-long-goodbye-2.php

Citizens United Sues Biden Administration Over ‘Election Takeover’ Records

Voters head to the polls at Irvine City Hall in Irvine, Calif., on June 7, 2022. (John Fredricks/The Epoch Times)

Citizens United Sues Biden Administration Over ‘Election Takeover’ Records

By Hannah Ng
 
0:003:26

The non-profit group Citizens United filed lawsuits on Aug. 17 against the U.S. Department of the Interior and Department of State over their failure to provide records related to President Joe Biden’s Promoting Access to Voting executive order, the Federalist has learned.

The two agencies were accused of violating the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The lawsuit came approximately two months after the group lodged the related request in June.

The appeal sought any emails or text messages to and from the two agencies mentioning the Promoting Access to Voting executive order and the Hatch Act, which limits certain political activities of federal employees, according to the complaints.

“The time period covered by the FOIA request was January 20, 2021 to June 2, 2022,” the complaint stated.

Driving Voter Registration Through Federal Bureaucracy

In March 2021, Biden signed Executive Order 14019, titled “Promoting Access to Voting,” in a bid to “leverage the resources of the federal government to increase access to voter registration services and information about voting,” according to a White House statement.

The stated goal of the executive order is to remove obstacles to voting for service members, people with disabilities, and Native Americans. The measure also directs federal agencies to expand time off policies to allow federal workers to vote and volunteer as poll workers.

However, Citizens United President David Bossie said the administration’s move “politicizes the federal workforce.” He called it “a blatant abuse of power that needs much more transparency.”

“The Biden Administration may have violated the Hatch Act and these records should provide the answer,” Bossie told The Federalist.

“This issue deserves far more transparency and that’s why we’re demanding these records be released to the American people,” he explained.

Conservatives’ Concern

The order, which has been dubbed an “election takeover” by conservatives, has sparked concern that it is an effort to drive Democrat voter registration and turnout, swinging elections in favor of Democrats as the 2022 Midterm elections approach.

On July 21, Rep. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) introduced the Promoting Free and Fair Elections Act seeking to shut down Biden’s order.

“Biden’s executive order pushing federal agencies to engage in electioneering on the taxpayers’ dime is inherently partisan and wrong,” Budd said on Twitter.

His bill was co-sponsored by other seven Republican House lawmakers, including House Election Integrity Caucus Co-Chair Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-N.Y.)

“President Biden has no business turning federal agencies into partisan voting operations for Democrats. It’s unconstitutional and would further undermine confidence in the integrity of our elections. I am standing up today to put an end to this overreaching effort,” Tenney said in a statement.

Meanwhile, other government watchdogs, including the Foundation for Government Accountability, the American Accountability Foundation, and the Center for Renewing America have all joined in the legal challenge against the Biden administration for failing to comply with FOIA requests in relation to the executive order.

In response to a complaint filed by the Foundation for Government Accountability in July, a federal district court ruled that the Department of Justice must hand over documents related to the executive order before the 2022 midterms.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/citizens-united-sues-biden-administration-over-election-takeover-records_4680262.html?utm_source=News&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-08-23-1&utm_medium=email&est=vSrBfFS9Es88bSsHIfvxvWUgVECbRB2BrPbqH51MJijRnGk95w3vL3QSkrEi

The Democratic Party Is Full of Election Deniers

The Democratic Party Is Full of Election Deniers

AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

Outgoing Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) said that she was “ashamed” of fellow Republicans like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Gov. Ron Desantis (R-Fla.), and declared them unfit for the presidency.

“Is the threat Trump or bigger than Trump? You could argue Trumpism, in terms of election denying, has taken over the party,” ABC News chief Washington correspondent Jonathan Karl asked her on Sunday.

“Donald Trump is certainly the center of the threat,” Cheney began, “but election denial, denying the fundamental function and principle, at the center of our constitutional republic is dangerous, broadly speaking.”

She continued, “He’s certainly leading that effort and leading that movement. He also, because we know precisely what he will do because he’s done it, sending an armed mob here to the Capitol to try to overturn the results of an election. There’s simply no way the nation can, in my view, sustain itself if we excuse that and put him in a position of power again.”

“You’re going to work against election deniers, if it’s not Trump and if it’s somebody like Ron DeSantis, Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, these are all people who tied them closely to Trump, will you oppose them? Can you see yourself supporting any of them?” Karl asked.

“It would be very difficult,” she said. “When you look at somebody like Josh Hawley or Ted Cruz, both of whom know better, both of whom know exactly the role of Congress is in terms of our constitutional obligations with respect to presidential elections, and yet both of whom took steps that, that fundamentally threatened the constitutional order and structure in the aftermath of the last election. So, you know, in my view, they both have made themselves unfit for future office.”

Karl also asked about Ron DeSantis, and Cheney agreed.

“DeSantis, who is right now campaigning for election deniers, and I think that’s something that I think people have to have real pause about,” Cheney said. “Either you fundamentally believe in and support our constitutional structure, or you don’t.”

You know, prior to 2020, questioning the results of an election — what Cheney calls “election denial” — was a Democrat pastime. In fact, over sixty Democrats boycotted Trump’s inauguration, because they believed Trump colluded with Russia and stole the election.

“I will not be part of normalizing or legitimizing a man whose election may well have depended on the malicious foreign interference of Russia’s leaders,” said Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.).

“I will not be attending the inauguration,” Rep. Dwight Evans (D-Pa.) declared on Twitter. “Russian hacking must be investigated and I do not support the repeal of ACA.”

“On Inauguration Day, I will not be celebrating. I will be organizing and preparing for resistance,” said Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.).

We know that the Trump-Russia collusion was a hoax from the very beginning yet was treated seriously and legitimized by the media, and Democrats used those allegations to undermine Trump’s presidency. It was investigated by Congress and by a special counsel. They all came up with nothing.

Yet Hillary Clinton still insists the 2016 election was “stolen” from her. Joe Biden’s Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, also believes the 2016 election was stolen from Hillary. So does Nancy Pelosi, who handpicked Liz Cheney for the J6 Committee.

Yet allegations of election irregularities were never given the same chance for investigation and scrutiny as the Russian collusion narrative. Liz Cheney should also know all about election denial because Democrats also denied the legitimacy of both the 2000 and 2004 elections — in which her father was elected and reelected as vice president of the United States. Many Democrats still claim that the 2000 election was “stolen” by the Bush team over the close election in the state of Florida. But, even in 2004, when the Bush-Cheney ticket won reelection handily, John Kerry’s advisors urged him to contest the results in Ohio over allegations of voting “irregularities” statewide.

According to the left, the conspiracy theory that Diebold voting machines had been secretly programmed to give Bush fraudulent votes persisted among Democrat activists and bloggers. There was never any evidence of this, but Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Ohio) and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) filed an objection (on behalf of a group of Democrats in Congress) to the counting of Ohio’s electoral votes and sought to delay certification of the 2004 presidential election results. As recently as 2018, John Kerry said that he still believes that Bush stole the election from him.

Questioning the results of elections is nothing new. Democrats have done it for years with impunity. Yet questioning the results of the 2020 election, despite all we know about irregularities and shenanigans in battleground states in that election, is treated differently from the other times, and Liz Cheney takes the side of Democrats. According to her, any Republican who dares to ask questions about the security of that election is a threat to our democracy, but Democrats, who believe Trump stole the 2016 election, and that her dad stole the 2000 and 2004 elections, are not.

Go home, Liz. You sound like a drunk Democrat.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/08/21/the-democratic-party-is-full-of-election-deniers-n1622802

Sunday, August 28, 2022

Dems Weaponize the IRS to Silence Critics

The Left's hit squad magnifies.

30 comments

[Read the free download of our IRS Ebook: Internal Radical Service.]

The public should be frightened that Democrats are passing new legislation to weaponize the already abusive Internal Revenue Service.

For nearly a century, the IRS has been used by presidents and members of Congress to harass and incriminate political foes. In addition to collecting revenue to fund the government, the IRS is a hit squad that destroys reputations and criminalizes dissenters.

A lot of pain can be inflicted under the guise of tax “auditing.” The bill passed by Congress last week, erroneously labeled the Inflation Reduction Act, will mean more audits and investigations. The bill roughly doubles funding for the IRS enforcement division, adding an estimated 49,600 agents and auditors.

Meanwhile, President Joe Biden is starving the Defense Department, requesting too little funding to even keep up with inflation, despite Russian and Chinese aggression. Yet his bill will make the IRS three-quarters the size of the U.S. Marine Corps. Who’s Biden making war on?

It’s true the IRS needs funding to improve services to taxpayers, including getting phone calls answered and returns processed, and moving from antiquated paper files to modern technology. The bill allocates a minuscule amount to those priorities and puts the lion’s share — over $45 billion — into “enforcement,” including hiring and arming agents.

As much as 90% of the funds raised through beefed up audits will come from people making less than $200,000 a year, according to the bipartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. Audits can bring a tsunami of government document demands and repeated visits from IRS agents over months or even years. Most people don’t have accountants and lawyers to insulate them from the pain.

While the bill increases IRS muscle, it fails to impose serious criminal penalties for leaking confidential taxpayer information and political targeting. History shows how dangerous that will be.

In the 1930s, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt used the IRS to harass newspaper publishers who opposed his New Deal and adversaries like Huey Long and Charles Coughlin.

Throughout the 1950s and ’60s, the IRS gave FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover access to its files, allowing tax information to be weaponized against the National Council of Churches, the NAACP and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

President John F. Kennedy set up the Ideological Organizations Audit Project to target right-leaning groups, including the think tank American Enterprise Institute and the John Birch Society.

President Richard Nixon’s counsel, John Dean, admitted the administration used “the available federal machinery to screw our political enemies.” The IRS was Nixon’s weapon of choice. The article of impeachment against Nixon included charges that he ordered “income tax audits or other income tax investigations” in “a discriminatory manner.”

President Bill Clinton sicced the IRS on accusers Gennifer Flowers and Paula Jones.

President Barack Obama’s IRS targeted tea party groups and other conservative nonprofits leading up to the 2012 presidential election, delaying their tax status to keep them from raising money. That scandal blew open in 2013 when IRS official Lois Lerner admitted the targeting. Yet no charges were brought against Lerner or any other IRS official, and she retired with full benefits.

And the abuse continues. Biden’s IRS leaked confidential tax information from Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett and other billionaires to left-wing publication ProPublica. Tax information is supposed to be kept confidential. We Americans have no choice but to provide it. But the IRS was playing footsie with left-wing media to help Democrats push their false claim that a tax crackdown is needed.

NPR praised the bill passed last week for “going after rich tax dodgers,” while Slate magazine cheered the “supercharged” IRS.

Don’t buy the rhetoric. Tax evasion is not a serious problem in the U.S., as it is in many other nations. Americans deplore tax cheats, according to the polls. The U.S. has one of the highest voluntary tax compliance rates in the world — about 84%.

In truth, the agency’s magnified clout will be used to muzzle and punish political critics. That’s a serious blow to our freedom.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/08/dems-weaponize-irs-silence-critics-frontpagemagcom/

Joe Biden may have ‘personally raised’ idea to investigate Michael Flynn

Joe Biden may have ‘personally raised’ idea to investigate Michael Flynn

Former Vice President Joe Biden appears to have “personally raised the idea” of investigating Michael Flynn for potentially having violated the obscure Logan Act during his phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, according to newly filed court papers Wednesday.

The previously sealed document also says that former President Barack Obama told top members of his administration that “the right people” should investigate Flynn.

But then-FBI Director James Comey acknowledged during the meeting — which also involved Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and possibly national security adviser Susan Rice — that Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak “appear legit,” according to the Washington, DC, federal court filing by Flynn’s defense lawyers.

The revelations are contained in handwritten notes prepared by disgraced ex-FBI Agent Peter Strzok that Flynn’s lawyers called “stunning and exculpatory evidence” in the government’s since-abandoned case against President Trump’s former national security adviser.

A partially blacked-out copy of Strzok’s notes is attached to the filing and includes a mention that appears to say: “VP: ‘Logan Act.'”

“According to Strzok’s notes, it appears that Vice President Biden personally raised the idea of the Logan Act,” defense lawyers Jesse Binnall and Sidney Powell wrote.

”That became an admitted pretext to investigate General Flynn.”

The revelation contradicts Biden’s claim of total ignorance regarding the Flynn probe when he was vice president, which he was asked about during a May 12 interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.

“I know nothing about those moves to investigate Michael Flynn,” he said at the time.

Biden later claimed he misunderstood the question, adding, “I was aware that there was — that they asked for an investigation, but that’s all I know about it, and I don’t think anything else.”

The Logan Act, which dates to 1799, bars unauthorized Americans from engaging in “any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government.”

The law has only led to two indictments — in 1803 and 1852 — but neither resulted in a conviction.

Strzok’s notes, apparently written on Jan. 4, 2017, were “previously withheld from General Flynn” until finally being turned over on Jan. 23 of this year, his lawyers wrote.

Wednesday’s four-page court filing, which was submitted in secret on Jan. 24, was made public following Wednesday’s blockbuster ruling by a federal appeals court that ordered the judge in Flynn’s case to let him withdraw his guilty plea for lying to the FBI about his conversations with Kislyak.

Biden’s campaign didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://nypost.com/2020/06/24/biden-may-have-personally-raised-idea-to-investigate-flynn/