Sunday, July 2, 2023

New Email Contradicts Garland on Hunter Biden Probe as Impeachment Talk Heats Up

New Email Contradicts Garland on Hunter Biden Probe as Impeachment Talk Heats Up

Zachary Stieber
June 26, 2023Updated: June 26, 2023
0:006:23

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has raised the idea of possibly opening an impeachment inquiry into U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland as a new email contradicts Garland’s testimony regarding the Hunter Biden investigation.

U.S. Attorney David Weiss recently brought several tax charges against Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s son, resulting in the younger Biden admitting guilt.

However, IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley has alleged in testimony to Congress that Weiss told top officials during a meeting in 2022 that he wasn’t the person deciding whether charges would be filed and that requests for charges to be brought in Washington and California had been rejected.

The allegations were made public on June 22.

Garland, who appointed Weiss, told reporters afterward that the allegations weren’t true.

Weiss was “permitted to … make a decision to prosecute any way in which he wanted to and in any district in which he wanted to,” according to Garland.

“He was given complete authority to make all decisions on his own,” Garland said.

But an email shows that Shapley’s testimony was corroborated by IRS official Darrell Waldon. Waldon, who also was in the 2022 meeting, in the email responds to a summary of the meeting by Shapley.

Shapley wrote that Weiss said he wasn’t the ultimate authority on charging decisions, that Weiss said his request for charges to be brought in Washington was rejected, and that Weiss said his request to be appointed special counsel was denied by Department of Justice leadership.

“You covered it all,” Waldon wrote.

He said he was making a referral to the Treasury inspector general for tax administration.

Garland told Congress in April that Weiss was in charge of the Hunter Biden investigation and that “there will not be interference of any political or improper kind.”

Garland also said more recently that Weiss never asked him to be made special counsel.

The IRS declined when asked to make Waldon available to comment.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) didn’t return an inquiry.

“Either Merrick Garland was not informed and didn’t know what the people under him were doing or he knew about it and lied to Congress about it,” Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, told The Epoch Times.

McCarthy said the disparities between the accounts mean that Weiss “must provide answers” to Congress. Garland has said that he supports Weiss testifying on the investigation.

“If it comes true what the IRS whistleblower is saying, we’re going to start impeachment inquiries on the attorney general,” McCarthy said on “Fox & Friends” on June 26.

If Garland lied to Congress, that would be potential grounds for impeachment, Spakovsky said.

The email also contradicts Weiss, who recently told the House Judiciary Committee that he was granted “ultimate authority over this matter, including responsibility for deciding where, when, and whether to file charges.”

“Gary told the truth, it’s verifiable, and no one has offered a shred of evidence contradicting any of it,” said Empower Oversight’s Jason Foster, one of the lawyers representing Shapley.

Foster and the rest of Shapley’s legal team said it’s up to Weiss and the DOJ to “reconcile the evidence” with the statements from Weiss and Garland.

Weiss, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, is the U.S. attorney for the District of Delaware.

A spokesperson for that office declined to comment.

Weiss charged Hunter Biden on June 20 with two misdemeanor tax charges and a felony firearm charge. The president’s son plans to plead guilty to the tax charges and is being allowed to enter a diversion process for the felony charge that could lead to it being dismissed.

Epoch Times Photo
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) speaks to the press after meeting with President Joe Biden to discuss the debt limit at the White House on May 22, 2023. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

Probe Took Five Years

The probe into Hunter Biden started in November 2018, according to Shapley.

The IRS agent says he came forward “to shine a light on conduct that I believed was improper and outside the norm of what I have come to know during my 14 years of experience as an IRS criminal investigation agent.”

“Now that the committee has taken the step of releasing my transcript, I believe Republicans and Democrats in the House and Senate should come together to examine these facts by interviewing other witnesses and reviewing documents to fully understand what happened during this five-year-long investigation,” he said.

The House Ways and Means Committee released transcripts of interviews with Shapley and another IRS whistleblower after a 25–18 vote.

All Republicans on the panel voted to release the transcripts. All Democrats on the panel voted against the release.

Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.), a former prosecutor, said the transcripts show “a level of criminality” and that Hunter Biden receiving a plea deal before investigators reviewed all the evidence was “very unusual.”

Weiss told the federal court in Delaware this month that Hunter Biden planned to plead guilty to two violations of a law that forbids intentionally failing to pay taxes. According to charging documents, Hunter Biden made more than $3 million in 2017 and 2018 and failed to pay more than $200,000 owed in taxes for those years.

Each misdemeanor count carries a penalty of up to one year in prison.

The government is also allowing Hunter Biden to enter a pretrial diversion agreement for the third charge, illegal possession of a gun while being addicted to a controlled substance. A person convicted of the charge can receive up to 10 years in prison.

Christopher Clark, a lawyer representing Hunter Biden, declined to comment.

“The president and first lady love their son and support him as he continues to rebuild his life,” Ian Sams, a White House spokesperson, told media outlets in a statement. “We will have no further comment.”

 https://www.theepochtimes.com/mccarthy-talks-of-impeaching-garland-as-new-email-contradicts-attorney-general_5356637.html?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-2023-06-26&src_cmp=gv-2023-06-26&utm_medium=email

THE FANTASY WORLD AND HYPOCRISY OF THE CLIMATISTAS

THE FANTASY WORLD AND HYPOCRISY OF THE CLIMATISTAS

BY STEVEN HAYWARD IN CLIMATE

Most DC-based trade associations end up becoming advocates for the administrative state within their sector or individual member companies (the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a prime example of a “pro-business” group going native inside the Beltway), so it is good to see a trade association bluntly push back against the conventional wisdom.

Let’s start with the nitwit who runs the United Nations:

The U.S. Oil and Gas Association decided to fire back:

That’s what I call delivering the gas!

There is zero chance anyone in the climate cabal will take this advice. Enjoy this one from the IPCC’s “moral philosopher”:

Here’s the text slightly enlarged so it is easier to read:

Because you really can’t solve the world’s energy supply problems without a “moral philosopher” on hand. Somehow I doubt that Broome or anyone else at the IPCC ever stops to consider the morality of keeping the billion-plus people in the world with no access to electricity in that state for decades so that we can drive our electric cars guilt-free.

Meanwhile, you may have seen the news not long ago that the Biden Administration wants our military to go all-electric. Does that really include tanks? Yes, it does. Bloomberg noted last week how insane this is:

The military’s grand vision of an all-electric fleet of tanks is being stymied by a battery sector that’s not even close to delivering the power the Army needs, according to two Pentagon officials.

The technological challenges mean not a single all-electric fighting vehicle is currently deployed in the field, with the Defense Department hoping intense interest in scaling up batteries for consumer and utility sectors will lead to breakthroughs for the battlefield.

To charge a 50-ton tracked combat vehicle inside the Army’s preferred envelope of 15 minutes, soldiers would need a 17-megawatt charging station—more than 20 times bigger than the largest mobile generator the Army currently has, said Dean McGrew, branch chief for powertrain electrification at the US Army DEVCOM Ground Vehicle Systems Center.

“Ideally, we would be able to go to a full electric vehicle, but currently the technology does not exist to generate, store, and distribute power in a tactically relevant amount of time for the frontline troops,” said Lt. Gen. Ross Coffman, who heads up the Army Futures Command’s next generation combat vehicle team.

Large mobile generators out on the battlefield? Yeah. I propose the Biden Administration field-test this with the M1 tanks they are (eventually, someday) supplying to Ukraine.

One of my favorite energy analysts, David Blackmon, comments:

No one who knows anything about energy would think, “oh sure, let’s make a tank  electric.”  Yet the political appointees at DOD have “grand visions of an all-electric fleet of tanks.”   Because replacing the carbon footprint of a 62-ton M1Abrams tank with its 1500hp gas turbine engine is good for the environment.

 https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/06/the-fantasy-world-and-hypocrisy-of-the-climatistas.php

Six Ways Biden’s Presidency Is Exposing the Obama Myth

Six Ways Biden’s Presidency Is Exposing the Obama Myth

 

AMAC

On Thursday, former President Barack Obama will appear in a primetime interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour to discuss “the state of democracy” in the United States. Some smart money bettors are wagering Obama is being trotted out to sanctify the Department of Justice’s attack on Trump and downplay its cover-up of Biden family corruption.

But whatever happens, the state of democracy is indeed a subject that the 44th president is uniquely qualified to speak on, since with his legacy now being brought to a culmination by a Biden presidency that many rightly regard as Obama’s third term, his own domestic and foreign failures and abuses of power are increasingly coming in for disillusioned commentary and often harsh judgement.

And while in what will probably be a typical fawning CNN interview Obama will certainly not be questioned about any of this, here, for the record, are the six ways by which the decline of American culture and democratic institutions seen in the Biden administration are merely a follow on to what Obama started and then institutionalized.

An Administration’s Right to Lie

From claiming gas was over $5 when he took office to calling the Afghanistan debacle an “extraordinary success,” Joe Biden has told major whoppers. But in doing so, he was only taking a page out of the playbook of his former boss, who made history with the boldest falsehoods ever told to the American people in a moment of foreign crisis or about major social legislation.

First Falsehood: The People’s Healthcare. The first of those two falsehoods – or, if you prefer, “lies,” since the evidence that they were just that is overwhelming – involved Obama’s signature legislative achievement, Obamacare. The bill was sold to the public on a series of lies – most infamously at least 37 instances where Obama or a top administration official said the program would cut costs by $2,500 per family, that people would be able to keep their doctor, and even more infamously, “if you like your plan, you can keep your plan.”

None of it was true, and the administration knew it. As MIT professor Jonathan Gruber, one of the main architects of Obamacare, infamously stated, if the administration had told the truth, the legislation might not have passed, adding that the law only passed because of “lack of transparency” and the “stupidity of the American voter.”

Obamacare and the slew of lies that accompanied it amount to a healthcare disaster for the American people, raising premium costs more than 25 percent beyond what they would have otherwise been and raising overall healthcare costs an estimated 69 percent.

Moreover, the public resented Obama’s mendacity, as Obamacare became a major factor in the famous 2010 midterm “shellacking” for Democrats – a defeat that it took them 10 years to overcome. Perhaps the clearest single instance of this failure was the loss of Ted Kennedy’s Massachusetts Senate seat.

In no small part due to the Obamacare lies, by the time Obama departed the White House in 2017, Republicans were in control of the presidency, House, and Senate – hardly a ringing endorsement of his leadership, and the first sign of things to come for the generation that had venerated Obama as an electoral godsend.

Second Falsehood: A Moment of International Crisis. Obama’s self-bestowed right to lie extended beyond Obamacare to foreign policy. In the aftermath of the Benghazi debacle in 2012, Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly lied to the American people about the attack that killed American Ambassador John Christopher Stevens in order to cover up their own failures and incompetence ahead of the 2012 election.

The mainstream media played a pivotal role in selling this lie to the public as well. During the second presidential debate in October 2012, Republican nominee Mitt Romney accused Obama of not explicitly referring to the Benghazi incident as a terrorist attack until two weeks after it occurred – a statement that was true, as the Obama administration continued to suggest it could have been a spontaneous act of social unrest rather than a planned attack. But CNN moderator Candy Crowley inserted herself into the debate to back up Obama, falsely accusing Romney of lying about Obama’s statements. The media also ran numerous stories backing up Crowley and Obama instead of correcting the record and saying that Romney was indeed correct.

The Benghazi lies harken back to the duplicity surrounding another major foreign policy event under a Democrat administration, the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which President Lyndon Johnson used as a pretext to expand U.S. military operations in Vietnam. In both instances, the president and his administration, with an assist from the media, lied about a major foreign policy failure in order to avoid negative headlines ahead of their re-election bids.

Other members of Obama’s inner circle became known as notoriously mendacious as well. Attorney General Eric Holder repeatedly lied to Congress, including about spying on the emails of Fox News reporters.

Lying under the Obama administration became routine, to the point where former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper felt empowered to also lie to Congress and the public about supposed links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign. Both Brennan and Clapper were secure in the knowledge they would not be punished by Obama and would in fact be treated as heroes by the media, even once their dishonesty was exposed.

Obama’s Corruption of the Corporate Media – Ethical Turning Point

The media’s constant cover-ups for Biden, from the state of his health to the suppression of the FBI-DOJ whitewashes of the Biden family corruption, have only been follow-ons to the loss of their journalistic soul to Obama. The banishment of two veteran, highly regarded women journalists at CBS and NBC who tried to do the journalistically ethical thing and tell the truth about Obama’s lies are flagship episodes of how media lost its own soul and its public trust due to its intoxication and eventual collusion with Obama.

The first was Lisa Meyers, NBC’s highly regarded investigative reporter who found evidence that the Obama administration knew it was misleading the public about Obamacare. Instead of backing their reporter and running the bombshell story, NBC shut it down, prompting Meyers to post the story on her personal Facebook page and depart NBC.

The second case was that of Sharyl Attkisson, a 20-year CBS veteran who took a particular interest in exposing the Obama administration’s lies on the Benghazi scandal. The executives at CBS repeatedly prevented Attkisson from covering the story in order to shield Obama from criticism ahead of the 2012 election.

While the far-left political tradition which Obama emerged from always talked about how the Gulf of Tonkin incident was the boldest lie ever told to the American people, Attkisson recognized that Obama and his top lieutenants had orchestrated an even more egregious lie in the Benghazi scandal, and worse had gotten the media to go along with it. Eventually, Attkisson was forced out of CBS entirely for the crime of reporting the truth about Democrat corruption and dishonesty.

While many commentators have tracked the loss of objectivity in journalism during George W. Bush’s second term, it was Obama who was the final temptation for the media elites to fully embrace covering up for a president it liked when he and his administration deliberately deceived the American people on key social legislation and a foreign crisis.

Obama’s Weaponization of Government

Along with the right to lie, Obama sanctioned an administration’s right to weaponize the government against its political opponents.

While the weaponization of the FBI against then-candidate Trump is perhaps the most egregious, it is hardly the only example of Obama using taxpayer-funded government agencies to target his political opponents. In another well-known example, Obama dismissed allegations that the IRS was targeting conservatives as “outrageous.”

But after a congressional investigation revealed clear evidence to the contrary, Obama let the architect of the scandal, Lois Lerner, off the hook. This signaled to Deep State government bureaucrats that they now had a free pass from Democrats to use the power of their offices to target Republicans.

The person at the Obama Justice Department charged with prosecuting the targets Lerner identified was none other than Jack Smith – the same Jack Smith who is now leading the Biden DOJ’s persecution of President Trump.

The Lois Lerner scandal also made possible the Russia hoax. As the 306-page Durham report found, there was never any legitimate reason for the FBI to open its probe into alleged links between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russian entities. It was all politically motivated.

The FBI and the Department of Justice “failed to uphold their mission of strict fidelity to the law,” the report concluded – a finding that was already obvious to any objective observer, but nonetheless further vindicated Republican concerns about the weaponization of government agencies against conservatives and Donald Trump in particular.

One of the chief individuals responsible for perpetrating the Russia hoax, the report found, was none other than President Obama.

According to page 81 of the report, “In late July 2016, U.S. intelligence agencies obtained insight into Russian intelligence analysis alleging that U.S Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee.”

Then, as recounted in his handwritten notes, former CIA Director John Brennan briefed Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and “other senior national security officials” on the alleged plot. That briefing included evidence of an “approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.”

All of this was happening as Clinton was dealing with the fallout from her own very real scandal stemming from her misuse of private email servers while she was Secretary of State. In another egregious abuse of power, it was later revealed that then-FBI General Counsel James Baker, who initially believed Clinton deserved criminal charges in 2016, was talked out of it “pretty late in the process.”

The Durham report, in other words, confirms that Obama knew about Clinton’s dirty trick, yet conspired with his top lieutenants to sell this massive hoax to the American people via a compliant mainstream media. Moreover, Obama dispatched Clapper, Brennan, and other officials to fuel the Clinton campaign’s lies through dozens of TV appearances.

While Obama likely did all of this to damage Trump and help boost Clinton over the top, he also likely did it to protect his own image – an effort that has now backfired in spectacular fashion.

Even after Trump overcame this blatant attempt to rig the election against him and won, Obama still remained silent. Recognizing that the game was up and he had lost, Obama could have told the truth, albeit at the expense of his credibility and public image.

Instead, he doubled down. In December 2016, Obama expelled 35 Russian diplomats in an apparent attempt to keep the hoax alive.

After he left office, Obama continued to say nothing as the media and Deep State bureaucrats harassed his successor and perpetrated a narrative that Obama knew was a lie. While the intention was to hurt Trump politically, Obama, as a former president, knew better than anyone how damaging the Russia hoax would be for the country and the world.

Now, the public is again seeing shades of Obama’s deceit and corruption in the anonymous whistleblowers from the IRS and FBI who have alleged that the government is “slow-walking” the investigation into Hunter Biden and the Biden family’s suspicious business dealings.

Biden has also carried on Obama’s shameful legacy of weaponization of government agencies through his use of the FBI to target both parents who speak out at school board meetings and traditionalist Catholics as potential “domestic extremists,” and through his attempt to create a “Disinformation Governance Board” (effectively a Ministry of Truth straight out of George Orwell’s 1984) at the Department of Homeland Security.

Theater of the Grotesque at the White House and the Decline of American Culture

Americans were rightly shocked and outraged to see viral videos of bare-breasted transgender activists at a White House “pride” event earlier this month. But Biden’s invitation of unsavory characters to the White House is only a continuation of a trend that began under Obama.

In 2009, Obama invited Harvard professor Henry Gates to the White House after Cambridge police arrested him for disorderly conduct. Obama also called police “stupid” for arresting him – an early hint of the left’s war on police, which would fully mature years later.

In 2014, Obama held a made-for-TV Rose Garden spectacle for U.S. Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl. Despite the fact that Bergdahl endangered his entire platoon by abandoning his post and was dishonorably discharged, Obama treated him as a conquering hero.

Obama’s disgraceful White House soirees with unhinged professors and military traitors were only one manifestation of his disdain for American culture and institutions. For instance, along with his baseless criticism of the Cambridge police, Obama also made inflammatory statements on the Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown cases that stoked racial tensions already building throughout the country.

Obama’s Enabling of Joe Biden’s Corruption

Just as he did with Hillary Clinton, Obama also increasingly appears to have ignored clear signs of corruption surrounding his vice president, Joe Biden. As a recent House Oversight Committee report revealed, associates of the scandal-plagued Hunter Biden visited the White House more than 80 times during Obama’s tenure.

This leads to one of two equally problematic conclusions for Obama: either he knew something wasn’t right and did nothing, or the Biden family carried out their corrupt business deals for years, in his White House no less, while he was none the wiser.

Foreign Policy Fiascos

Perhaps no link between Biden and Obama is as clear as the foreign policy disasters the two have left in their wake.

During Obama’s presidency, Russia became a major player in Syria and invaded Crimea, laying the groundwork for the invasion of Ukraine last year. It is no coincidence that Putin seized land under Obama but then waited until Trump was out of office to launch his invasion of Ukraine.

While Trump took a hardline stance toward Russia, Obama repeatedly kowtowed to Moscow, in one infamous instance telling then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in 2012 to ask Putin for “space,” going on to say that he would have “more flexibility” after the election to discuss a missile defense treaty. In other words, Obama was asking Medvedev to hand him a temporary victory on missile defense talks until after he had won a second term, with the promise that afterward Obama would make a deal with Putin that would not have been favorable to many American voters.

Obama also severely underestimated the rise of ISIS, at one point calling them a “junior varsity” team – much like Biden underestimated how quickly the Taliban would recapture Afghanistan following the U.S. departure. In the case of ISIS, it would take the election of President Trump to eradicate a threat that Obama should have quashed from the start.

Under Obama, America’s allies and enemies alike developed contempt for the United States, with Putin, China, Iran, and North Korea growing more aggressive under his watch. After a resurgence of U.S. global prestige under Trump, America’s standing in the world has collapsed once again under Biden.

Obama’s Tattered Legacy

For the media and cultural elites who hailed the 44th president as a political saint, and a generation of young liberals who grew up with him as a fixture on their TV screens, the dismantling of the “Obama myth” has been nothing short of catastrophic.

Obama’s meteoric rise to power was hailed by the press and Democrat establishment as the beginning of a new, brighter future for the country. The mainstream media compared the relatively unaccomplished senator from Illinois to a “god.” Academia, meanwhile, excitedly reported that Obama’s 2008 victory was the fulfillment of the prophecy of permanent liberal dominance laid out in the notoriously wrong 2002 book, The Emerging Democratic Majority.

But the next eight years would turn out to be far different from the liberal utopia Americans, and in particular young Democrats, were promised. There are of course the many lies and deceptions mentioned here, but also the destruction of the American economy and border disaster that President Trump would spend most of his term correcting.

The Durham report has further underscored these failures and shattered the myth the media and Democrat establishment attempted to create about Obama. Far from an aspirational leader who represented the best of America, Obama has now been exposed as a serial liar who left the country in a worse state than when he took office. Obama, the great constitutional law professor who never held a real job outside of politics or academia, ran an administration known for its mendacity, corruption, weaponization of government, repression of political dissent, military weakness, foreign policy disasters, a rise in crime, and the destruction of American cities.

All of this points to a man who deeply resented American culture – perhaps because he believed it had never accepted his absent father. But from his condescending remarks about normal Americans who “go to church” and “have their guns,” to the contempt Obama showed as a former college professor and community organizer to “Joe the plumber” when he instructed that hard-working American on how he and his left-wing friends had a right to spread around the wealth small business people like “Joe the plumber” created, to his bold statement to other American small businesses that government is responsible for their success, not themselves, Barack Obama emerges as the model of the entitled and privileged beneficiary who despises the very economic and political system that gave him so much.

Regardless, for that liberal generation which tied so much of its political identity to Obama and his legacy, these revelations must be horrifying, no matter how hard they try to deny them. This in part explains the left’s insatiable need to “get Trump” – to punish the man perceived as puncturing the Obama myth.

But no matter how hard they go after Trump, it will never erase what Trump and his movement exposed. The promise of Obama was always empty, and the shiny veneer of his political brand was always destined to lose its luster.

https://townhall.com/columnists/sponsored-by-amac/2023/06/26/six-ways-bidens-presidency-is-exposing-the-obama-myth-n2624973?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=15803c7fc8c68b6fd1f0a5e7f4b59fc49df45d48335d4339ad60f7b0a0c7404d&recip=28668535

Saturday, July 1, 2023

Winsome Sears Goes There in Responding to Justice Jackson's Dissent in College Admissions Case

Winsome Sears Goes There in Responding to Justice Jackson's Dissent in College Admissions Case

AP Photo/Cliff Owen

During a discussion reacting to the Supreme Court’s ruling that affirmative action policies in college admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Sears called out Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson for being a diversity hire.

The comment came during an interview on Fox News’s “The Story,” after host Martha MacCallum read viewers Jackson’s dissent. 

“This is the dissent from Justice Jackson, she said, ‘With let them eat cake obliviousness today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces color blindness for all by legal fiat. But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life,’ she said. She and Justice Sotomayor were outraged by this decision. Sotomayor said, ‘The opinion today will highlight the court’s own impetus in the face of America who cries for equality resound.’ What would you say to these justices?”

“Well, what you have is the justice who was chosen because she’s black and because she’s a woman,” Sears responded. “You know, that’s what we’re understanding now, what a woman is. And Martha, while we’re playing these stupid games, I’m saying that education and the lack of it in America is risen to a national crisis. China is not playing these stupid games. China is interested in total world domination, and so is Russia and the rest of them. That’s what we have to be concerned about. Our children are not learning. In fact, when they do graduate from high school and decide to go on to college, Martha, more than 60% of them, according to the statistics, need remedial education that very first year. So, you know how the president is talking about getting rid of student loans? Well, then the children are having to stay one extra year in college based on loans that they have taken for work that they should have completed when they were in high school. So, let’s cut that and let’s get to what the remedies are, and I’m pulling for school choice. School choice now. Our children are in need.”


OFFSHORE FOLLIES

OFFSHORE FOLLIES

BY JOHN HINDERAKER IN ENERGY POLICYUNITED KINGDOM

There could be a worse way to generate electricity than by implanting giant windmills in the ocean, but it is hard to think what it might be. Not surprisingly, Britain is finding its plans for offshore wind to be illusive: How Britain’s offshore wind industry ran out of puff.

Championed by politicians as a controversy-free alternative to onshore wind and solar farms, the Government wants offshore wind capacity to surge from 13 gigawatts today to 50 gigawatts by 2030.

Why giant turbines in the ocean should be controversy-free is hard to understand. In any event, things are not going well.

A string of major projects are under threat from spiralling costs, sclerotic planning rules and shrinking subsidies. Industry sources warn that it risks tilting the economics into negative territory. “Things are very hard out there right now,” one source says.

“Negative territory” in this context means that government subsidies are not large enough, and need to be increased.

The malaise is triggering fresh questions about whether the Government’s 2030 target is still achievable – and if the long–assumed maxim that offshore wind costs will keep falling can hold.

There is no significant element of offshore wind’s costs that should be expected to decline, and increasing government-driven demand for the minerals of which wind turbines consume vast amounts will inevitably cause those prices to rise.

Britain’s offshore wind industry exploded over the past decade, with most development concentrated off the east coasts of Scotland and England. Capacity has grown tenfold since 2010, when it stood at just 1.3 gigawatts, with ever-bigger turbines boosting output.

One example is Dogger Bank, a phased development in the North Sea that will eventually generate enough power for 6 million homes.

It would be more accurate to say that if completed, it will occasionally generate enough power for 6 million homes. Wind turbines create electricity 35% to 40% of the time. Most of the time, another source will need to be found.

But rising supply chain costs globally – fueled by energy prices that jumped after the Ukraine war – have slammed the breaks on this progress.

But wait! The energy prices that “jumped after the Ukraine war” were those for natural gas and gasoline. Why would that impact the supply chain for wind turbines? Can’t you just use wind energy to run the factories that produce wind turbines?

Just kidding. You can’t run a factory on electricity that is AWOL 60% to 65% of the time. Reliable energy sources will always be needed to manufacture unreliable energy sources. Although why you would want to do that is anyone’s guess.

Apparently everyone is losing money on wind turbines:

General Electric’s renewables business, which makes the 260 metre-tall Haliade X turbines used at Dogger Bank, reported a $2.2bn (£1.7bn) loss in 2022. The division has been loss-making for eight straight quarters.

Rival manufacturers Siemens Gamesa, Vestas and Nordex also posted further cumulative losses of €3bn in the same year, notes Kathryn Porter, an independent analyst at energy consultancy Watt Logic.

“There has been this narrative, that wind farm costs are falling and will keep falling, but the reality is these prices are too low.

“Turbine manufacturers have effectively been selling at a loss – and those losses have become huge now.”

Wind energy is a sinkhole for money. The only solution is more government subsidies. In that regard, the Brits are jealous of us Americans, who are going deeper into debt to keep the “green” money machine going:

Many of these problems are not unique to the UK. But they are colliding with domestic issues, including the slow planning system and shrinking British subsidies – which now look even meaner when compared to those being showered on companies in the US through Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act.

Thanks, Joe. Another problem is that giant wind turbines anchored in the seabed don’t actually work well, even when “working” is defined as 35% production:

The “bigger is better” approach to turbines is leading to more failures, costing manufacturers more in warranty claims, Porter says.
***
In an effort to cut costs, some developers are attaching the turbines using cheaper foundations on the sea floor, the executive adds.

“Offshore wind is not the Nirvana that everybody thinks it is,” they add. “The risks are enormous. And the rewards are not very good.

“Everyone is going for the biggest turbines, the cheapest foundations, and they’ve all gone for cabling solutions that mean if you get a failure, you could lose the wind farm.”

I think that in 25 years, offshore wind will be seen as one of the worst follies in the history of technology. Even now, a few are asking good questions:

[F]or some, these problems raise much bigger questions about subsidies for offshore wind generally.

“We are 20 years on from when we started subsidising offshore wind, yet we are still having to do it”, says Porter at Watt Logic.

“If you are meant to be supporting a nascent technology until it gets to maturity, then subsidies should eventually fall to zero over time. If that is not your goal, then what is the point of these subsidies now?”

The real point is the biggest transfer of wealth in world history, but don’t hold your breath waiting for anyone to say that out loud.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/06/317745.php