Tuesday, February 2, 2021

Gabbard: Biden Should Denounce His Administration’s Effort to Take Away Civil Liberties

Then-Democratic presidential candidate, and then-representative for Hawaii, Tulsi Gabbard speaks during a campaign event in Lebanon, N.H., on Feb. 6, 2020. (Brendan McDermid/Reuters)

Gabbard: Biden Should Denounce His Administration’s Effort to Take Away Civil Liberties

Former Democratic presidential candidate and former representative for Hawaii, Tulsi Gabbard said in a series of tweets on Tuesday that John Brennans, the Adam Schiffs, and the oligarchs in Big Tech who take away civil liberties “are also domestic enemies and much more powerful.”

She called on President Joe Biden and all members of Congress from both parties to denounce the effort.

“The mob who stormed the capitol to try to stop Congress from carrying out its constitutional responsibilities were behaving like domestic enemies of our country,” the former congresswoman said. 

“But let us be clear, the John Brennan’s, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally-protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style ‘surveillance’ are also domestic enemies—and much more powerful, and therefore dangerous, than the mob which stormed the capitol,” she said.

The Biden administration initiated a federal agency level campaign 2 days after taking the office, to investigate domestic terrorism in the United States. White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Jan. 22 connected that investigation to the Jan. 6 protest at the Capitol.

“The Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol and the tragic deaths and destruction that occurred underscored what we have long known: The rise of domestic violent extremism is a serious and growing national security threat,” Psaki said.

Gabbard called on Biden and all the Congress members to denounce these efforts and said that the United States will be in great danger if people do not stand up to them.

“President Biden, I call upon you and all of Congress from both parties to denounce efforts by Brennan and others to take away our civil liberties endowed to us by our Creator, and guaranteed in our Constitution. If you don’t stand up to them now, then our country will be in great peril,” she said in the video posted to Twitter.

In the video, Gabbard included a segment of an interview by former CIA Director John Brennan by MSNBC on Jan. 20.

“I know looking forward that the members of the Biden team, who have been nominated or have been appointed, are now moving in laser-like fashion to try to uncover as much as they can about what looks very similar to insurgency movements that we’ve seen overseas,” Brennan said. “Where they germinate in different parts of the country, and they gain strength, and it brings together an unholy alliance, frequently, of religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists—even libertarians. ”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/gabbard-biden-should-denounce-his-administrations-effort-to-take-away-civil-liberties_3673141.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-01-27-2

‘They Want to Cancel Our Culture, Our History, Our Liberty’: Goya CEO

Goya Foods CEO and President Bob Unanue speaks in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, on July 9, 2020. (Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images)

‘They Want to Cancel Our Culture, Our History, Our Liberty’: Goya CEO

 

Robert Unanue, Goya Foods President and CEO, said on Friday the political left has weaponized the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus to take away God, culture, history, and liberty from the people of the United States.

“The problem is it’s a political year. They weaponized coronavirus. Unfortunately, they shut down this economy. The worst thing we could do is shut down our economy, kill our spirit. We need a reason to get up in the morning: God, family, work. And they are taking away our spirit, they’re taking away our ability to work,” Unanue told Fox News on Jan. 15.

“We’re one nation under God. We’re not one nation under Twitter. We’re not one nation under big media and or under central government. We’re trying to have media, Big Tech control our lives, the government control our lives,” he said.

“They want to cancel God. They want to cancel our speech. They want to cancel our culture, our history, our liberty. They want to control us, the few controlling the many like a bunch of sheep. None of these people care about us, we can not move away from God. We need to love and to build, not hate and destroy,” he added.

Unanue said Goya experienced its most successful year in 2020 after leftists tried to boycott his products.

Unanue made sympathetic remarks about Trump earlier in 2020, comparing the president’s entrepreneurialism to that of his grandfather’s. His remarks sparked ire among Trump’s critics, with celebrities and politicians, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and former Democratic presidential candidate Julian Castro, denouncing the brand or calling for Goya boycotts.

Ocasio-Cortez was nominated “employee of the month” in December by Goya after her call to boycott Goya stimulated a 10-fold growth in sales, Unanue told The Michael Berry Show.

Unanue further criticized the left, saying that their handling of the CCP virus pandemic was done for political gain.

“They essentially declared martial law. …  It’s the worst thing we could have done, just for political gain. I think it’s criminal, I think it’s immoral to shut down this economy for this basically political reasons,” he said.

Unanue called on people to get closer to God during this difficult time.

“We need to not move away from God. We need to move closer to God,” he said.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/they-want-to-cancel-our-culture-our-history-our-liberty-goya-ceo_3659453.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-01-17-1

Don's Tuesday Column

         THE WAY I SEE IT   by Don Polson   Red Bluff Daily News   2//2021

Make America unemployed again


Tens of thousands of jobs—ultimately probably over a million when the ripple effects of cancelling the Keystone XL pipeline, stopping the paid-for border wall, and putting a stop to gas and oil leases on federal land—were “cancelled” with a few Biden pen strokes. Re-regulating will kill millions of jobs, too.


The 31 percent of local voters for Biden are not to be demonized for every ill-conceived new Biden, or reversed Trump, policies. Nationwide, less than 10 percent of the electorate self-describes as “progressive activist.” Most of that local 31 percent probably felt fine with much of what President Donald J. Trump accomplished; what he said about it all, not so much.


The hateful A-B-T (Anybody But Trump) mindset, combined with having a like-minded circle of friends and family, likely left such voters with little choice. Know that harsh assertions do not apply to centrist Democrats, but are truthful, factual analysis of the Democrat leadership in office; be willing to be persuaded.


The two-thirds of local voters that chose President Trump should feel vindicated by what transpires in the Democrat-controlled branches of government, but not in a good way for the interests, security, well-being, and economy of this nation. If you took the facile calls for “unity” as sincere, you can set that notion aside. Many Democrat voters 1) wouldn’t have voted for Biden if they had been informed of the half dozen or so Biden scandals, 2) are aware of, and agree with, the credible evidence and assertions of fraudulent votes and practices showing—not widespread but certainly sufficient—cheating to have made the difference in Biden’s favor in a half-dozen or so states. Hence, His Fraudulency.


Informed historians know that vote fraud in Chicago and Texas Democratic machines likely gave John Kennedy the electoral, even popular vote win in 1960. Time will ultimately vindicate Trump’s assertions of a stolen election, as many now see it. The buck now stops with Biden and the Dems.


A ski buddy of ours took a cynical view: Just let the Democrats have it all; let the citizens see what corrupt, one-party, despotic governance really is; they won’t ever let Dems run things again. I told him then, and still believe, that the first measures taken will assure Dems of never losing another election, regardless.


From President Donald J. Trump’s Independence Day speech at Mount Rushmore: “We will raise the next generation of American patriots. We will write the next thrilling chapter of the American adventure. And we will teach our children to know that they live in a land of legends, that nothing can stop them, and that no one can hold them down. They will know that, in America, you can do anything, you can be anything, and together, we can achieve anything.” Can we unify around that sentiment? Why not?


There are limits to what we will unite with. Trump spelled it out: “In our schools, our newsrooms—even our corporate boardrooms—there is a new far-left fascism that demands absolute allegiance. If you do not speak its language, perform its rituals, recite its mantras, and follow its commandments, then you will be censored, banished, blacklisted, persecuted and punished. Make no mistake: this left-wing Cultural Revolution is designed to overthrow the American Revolution. In so doing, they would destroy the very civilization that rescued billions from poverty, disease, violence and hunger, and that lifted humanity to new heights of achievement, discovery and progress.


Mr. Robert Unanue, Goya Foods President and CEO, said on Friday (Jan. 15): “The political left has weaponized the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus to take away God, culture, history, and liberty from the people of the United States.” In shutting down the economy, they have tried to “kill our spirit. We need a reason to get up in the morning: God, family, work…They want to cancel our speech, our culture, our history, our liberty. They want to control us, the few controlling the many like a bunch of sheep.”


Starry-eyed Biden cheerleaders, and ideologically committed idealists, locally or elsewhere, have probably moved past elation and utopian fantasies to the gritty, partisan work of pushing policies and legislation that majorities don’t support. They would be well-advised to consider public sentiment, which does not trend in the direction of open borders, mass legalization of unlawful aliens, killing off the extraction of the only energy sources capable of providing scalable, on-demand electricity: coal, oil and natural gas.


You Democrats now own: 1) Biden ordering the State Department to restore relations with the genocidal terrorists of Hamas; 2) Biden unilaterally destroying 11,000 jobs (cancelling Keystone XL pipeline) and $1.6 billion in wages, not to mention the additional economic harm to those communities; 3) Sending that oil in tanker trucks and railroad cars, risking greater environmental pollution; 4) Making America more dependent on foreign energy sources; 5) Crime, murders, rapes and violence inflicted by illegal alien criminals set free on Biden’s orders to not deport them and let more in. It’s on you.


 A level-headed former candidate and representative for Hawaii, Democrat Tulsi Gabbard, has raised alarms over the apparent trend toward taking away our civil liberties by some in Biden’s party. She called for Biden—and this would be a great example of seeking unity—to denounce “the John Brennans, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally-protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style ‘surveillance.’ [They] are also domestic enemies—and much more powerful, and therefore dangerous, than the mob which stormed the capitol.”


Doggedly pursuing the impeachment of Donald Trump is the opposite of “seeking unity.” Your party will stop it right now if civility, comity and ending partisan rancor mean anything. Otherwise, you’re all hypocrites.

Here's Why Impeachment Will Backfire on Democrats and Make Trump Stronger

Here's Why Impeachment Will Backfire on Democrats and Make Trump Stronger

AP Photo/Lynne Sladky

Democrats claim that impeaching Donald Trump after he’s left office is a question of “accountability” and that Trump must be humiliated and prevented from running for office ever again.

But Trump’s impeachment trial will only strengthen the Republican base. Trump has more clout within the party since he left office. And despite not being on social media, he has become even more of a presence. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy made a pilgrimage to Mar-a-Largo to huddle with Trump about his and the GOP’s future — a remarkable occurrence considering the ill favor Trump is in with many national Republicans.

But McCarthy knows that Trump is the key to any success the Republicans will have in 2022. For better or worse, the Republicans and Trump are joined at the hip and they will sink or swim together.

This has become clear as members hear an earful from Trump supporters when they go home. And, if anything, Trump has gained prestige as a result of the torrent of abuse coming from the Left.

Fox News:

“People don’t want to hear anything against Trump,” Palmeri said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Actually, the more he stays out of the media, the more that he becomes this martyr, this looming figure over the GOP.”

In fact, there is now a “crusade” being waged on behalf of the former president in places like Wyoming, where Trump is “way more popular” [than] the state’s high-ranking congressional Republican, U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney, Palmeri said.

The people of Wyoming are not alone. In red states, especially, Trump’s upcoming impeachment trial will only energize them more. Instead of a dispirited, fractured Republican Party, Democrats may very well be facing an enraged, motivated GOP electorate in 2022. The anti-Trump faction is being purged. What’s left will be hardcore Trump supporters itching to get back at Democrats.

This doesn’t necessarily mean Republicans will sweep to victory. The party of Trump might be smaller and more regional. And the election would play out quite differently with Trump not running.

CNN:

The Trump dynamic, operatives said, could play out in very dramatic ways: While the party apparatus may subtly back certain candidates in key Senate primaries, Trump could weigh in to back candidates who have been openly loyal to him, creating a clear rift between party leaders and the former President.

“It is incredibly complicating,” said a top Republican who has worked on Senate races. “It was incredibly complicated over the last few years and we had at least a seat at the table. He has left the building, so any leverage that Senate Republicans possibly had that they could possibly utilize to get him on the same page are no longer options.”

Trump knows the political score and will have to decide whether he wants to help or hurt the party. A few well-placed endorsements could hand the Senate to Republicans. Or he could just as easily back some QAnon nutcase who would lose by 30 points in a statewide race.

One thing is certain; the Republican base loves Trump and is likely to follow wherever he leads — whether over a cliff or on the victory stand.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2021/01/30/heres-why-impeachment-will-backfire-on-democrats-and-make-trump-stronger-n1419613

Monday, February 1, 2021

‘Yes There Is An Enemy Within’: Rep. Marjorie Greene

Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene speaks to a GOP women's group in Rome, Ga., on March 3, 2020. (John Bailey/Rome News-Tribune via AP)

‘Yes There Is An Enemy Within’: Rep. Marjorie Greene

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said Saturday that America is facing “an enemy within.”

She singled out socialist “America Last” policies—apparently referring to the opposite of former President Donald Trump’s America First agenda, in a string of Twitter posts.

“Yes there is an enemy within,” she wrote. “And that enemy is a poisonous rot of socialist policies and America last sell outs who are pompous hypocrites that believe they are untouchable elites.”

By using the term “enemy within,” Greene seemed to be responding to recent remarks made by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

She told reporters that the House needs more money for security because of an enemy within the House.

“I have said this all along, that we will probably need a supplemental for more security for Members when the enemy is within the House of Representatives, a threat that Members are concerned about, in addition to what is happening outside,” Pelosi said Thursday during a press conference.

She later elaborated that she was referring to House members who want to bring firearms on the Chamber floor.

“It means that we have Members of Congress who want to bring guns on the Floor and have threatened violence on other Members of Congress,” she explained.

Pelosi’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comments from The Epoch Times.

The authorities enhanced security measures at the Capitol after some protesters and rioters stormed the building on Jan. 6. The new measures include metal detectors near the entrance of the House Chambers, controversial fences around the capitol, and the continued presence of National Guard troops.

Lawmakers are permitted to carry firearms within the Capitol complex, with proper permits in place, but are not permitted to do so on the House or Senate floors.

At least one House member set off a metal detector near the entrance of the House chamber with a firearm after its installation.

Earlier this month, Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) reportedly set off a newly installed metal detector while trying to enter the House chamber and was found to be carrying a concealed gun, the ABC News reported.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/yes-there-is-an-enemy-within-rep-marjorie-greene_3678619.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-01-30-3

Gas Taxes May Soon Increase. Here’s Why That’s Especially Bad News for the Poor and Middle Class

Gas Taxes May Soon Increase. Here’s Why That’s Especially Bad News for the Poor and Middle Class

Any gas tax hike will exacerbate inequality.

Isold my car when I went to New York City in 2019, so I’m one of the rare individuals not impacted by the prices at the gas tank. But for the average American, who drives over 16,000 miles per year, the cost per gallon can quickly make a dent in their take home pay. To drive all those miles, most individuals consume 720 gallons of gasoline a year. What they may not know is they’re paying approximately $132.48 in federal gas taxes. And, according to Pete Buttigieg, that number may soon be increasing.

During a recent confirmation hearing before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, Buttigieg—who is President Biden’s nominee for Transportation Secretary—stated he was open to raising the federal gas tax to fund the Highway Trust Fund.

The topic was brought up by Republican Senator Rick Scott, who asked if Buttigieg might support such an increase. Buttigieg responded, “Well, I think all options need to be on the table...As you know, the gas tax has not been increased since 1993, and it’s never been pegged to inflation. And it’s one of the reasons why the current state of the Highway Trust Fund is that there’s more going out than coming in.”

The Highway Trust Fund is how the US pays for federal government spending on highways and mass transit. In recent years the fund has become insolvent.

Since 2008, Congress has propped the fund up by transferring $140 billion of general revenues to it, but shortfalls are still expected by 2021. And it is projected to get worse from there. According to the Congressional Budget Office, 2030 projections show that the fund’s commitments will exceed its revenues by $134 billion for the highway fund and $54 billion for the mass transit side.

This could spell disaster for the numerous projects currently underway and be a significant roadblock in the administration’s infrastructure goals—which are ambitious. Biden is expected to unveil a $2 trillion package focused on clean energy provisions, expanding 5G, high speed light rail, and bridge and road repairs.

Infrastructure is largely popular among Americans of all political persuasions, and America has fallen behind in development compared to other Western countries. Americans pay a large percentage of their income in taxes, and in exchange, they expect decent roads, accessible transportation options, reliable airports, and connectivity.

It is estimated that traffic congestion alone costs the US economy $120 billion per year. In New York City, 17,000 hours of lost worker time were incurred in 2017 alone due to mass transit delays. And as the nation looks to the implementation of autonomous vehicles, transportation experts say our roads are nowhere near prepared. All of that to say, there is a real and pressing need for infrastructure development.

The question is not whether we need better transportation infrastructure, it’s how to pay for it. And an increase to the federal gas tax should be out of the question.

Gas taxes (both those imposed federally or at the state level) are regressive. Regressive tax structures are those that, when applied uniformly, take a larger percentage of income from low earners than high earners. A progressive tax, in contrast, is one that takes a larger percentage of income from high earners than others.

The liberal-leaning Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center reports that gas taxes hit low and moderate income earners the hardest, especially those who live in rural areas and may drive long-distances for basic supplies.

The impact of this tax on the poor and middle income earners is not negligible. For the vast majority of Americans, transportation is an essential good that ensures they can get to work, take their kids to school, go to the doctor, or convene with their bodies of faith.

The average American spends roughly 13 percent of their income on transportation, but that cost is not consistent across income brackets. In fact, the lowest earners spend the largest portion of their wages on transportation, and that portion tends to decrease as a person moves up in earnings. A 2016 study found, for example, that the lowest earning 20 percent of the population earned an average of $11,933 and spent an average of $3,497 (29 percent) on transportation costs.

It is undeniable that any gas tax hike would exacerbate inequality. Moreover, the surreptitious method of the tax is highly problematic.

Albert Camus, the French philosopher and journalist once said, “It is no more immoral to directly rob citizens than to slip indirect taxes into the price of goods that they cannot do without."

The gas tax is a perfect example of such a case.

Fortunately, there are other options available to fund our infrastructure needs besides a gas tax hike. Buttigieg noted as much in his testimony. “In the long term, we need to bear in mind also that as vehicles become more efficient and as we pursue electrification, sooner or later there will be questions about whether the gas tax can be effective at all.”

One such option would be for the federal government to cut spending elsewhere, and boy are there plenty of places to do that. At the end of 2020, Senator Rand Paul released his annual “Festivus Report” where he found over $54 billion in government waste. And one need look no further than last year’s stimulus package, chock full of crony special favors and pork, for examples of how the federal government blows our resources.

It is undeniable that any gas tax hike would exacerbate inequality.

Another option would be to simply stop crowding out private enterprise’s capacity to improve our transportation infrastructure. Companies like Uber, Tesla, and The Boring Company are lightyears ahead of the federal government. As FEE contributor Matthew Boyer points out, “Those companies are made up of researchers, engineers, and tech titans – not bureaucrats. These folks are at the heart of the problems and it’s their job to find a solution. They’re the experts in their fields. If you wouldn’t trust a politician to be your doctor, why would you trust them to be your engineer?” There’s no question that the free market could deliver better, faster products, and usually at a cheaper price, than the federal government.

We know that when left to their own devices, politicians will always seek to enrich themselves and their friends. Throwing more money at a problem is not a solution. Instead we need to look for ways to better appropriate the revenues our government collects to projects that ultimately serve the general public.

As Biden came into power, many on the left were overjoyed and felt assured that the new administration would dedicate itself to eradicating inequality, racial injustice, and poverty. But Buttigieg’s statements are proof that government policies will always exacerbate, rather than alleviate inequality, unless those policies are focused on spreading free market ideals that remove the brunt of government from the backs of Americans. Otherwise, some government policies will always harm some groups of people more than others, and quite frequently those groups are the very people the government purports to help.

https://fee.org/articles/gas-taxes-may-soon-increase-here-s-why-that-s-especially-bad-news-for-the-poor-and-middle-class/?fbclid=IwAR2aFhsrRuTxbMge6z8JVPikzV8h-E1ScuXNGu_nysVAfNwLz1WSgCshhPU

Texas Judge to Extend Curbs on Joe Biden’s No-Deportation Policy

Texas Judge to Extend Curbs on Joe Biden’s No-Deportation Policy

MESA, AZ - JUNE 24: An undocumented Guatemalan immigrant, chained for being charged as a criminal, is checked before boarding a deportation flight to Guatemala City, Guatemala at Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport on June 24, 2011 in Mesa, Arizona. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, ICE, repatriates thousands of undocumented …
John Moore/Getty Images
2:47

President Joe Biden’s plan to block deportations of illegal aliens living in the United States will likely be tied up for another month, according to media reports.

CNN reported January 29:

A federal judge in Texas said Friday that he’ll likely extend his hold on the Biden administration’s deportation moratorium until February 23.

Earlier this week, Judge Drew Tipton of the Southern District of Texas, a Trump appointee, blocked the administration’s 100-day pause on deportations, delivering a blow to one of President Joe Biden’s first immigration actions. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, had sued, leading to the first legal block of one of Biden’s executive actions.

Tipton initially blocked the administration from executing its deportation pause for 14 days. The temporary restraining order, Tipton argued, was appropriate under the Administrative Procedure Act.

U.S. border agencies are still deporting migrants back to Central America, according to a group that tracks deportation flights. But the aircraft are likely carrying recent arrivals at the border, and those new migrants are not included in Biden’s no-deportation policy. Advocates also claim that some migrants are being deported from interior states.

During President Donald Trump’s tenure, pro-migration groups persuaded many judges to block Trump regulations — including his cancellation of the DACA amnesty — on the grounds that they did not precisely follow the bureaucratic procedures required by the Administrative Procedure Act. Pro-migration advocates are displeased at the sudden reversal.

On 26 January, Breitbart News reported that Paxton had filed a lawsuit against the administration:

Hours after taking office on January 20, Biden signed an executive order that halts deportations of most illegal aliens for at least 100 days. The order came as illegal immigration has spiked in recent months and a migrant caravan heads to the United States-Mexico border in the hopes of taking advantage of the Biden administration’s lax enforcement policies.

Last week, Paxton filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration, asking a federal judge to block the order noting the negative impact it would have on the state of Texas and its social services.

The court decision, however, constraints only part of Biden’s deportation freeze. For example, the judge’s decisions do not curb Biden’s directives to sharply reduce the arrests and detention of illegal migrants.