Friday, March 29, 2024

States Are Waking Up to the Medicaid Expansion Trap

States Are Waking Up to the Medicaid Expansion Trap

Thomas Savidge

spukkato/iStock/Getty Images Plus

On March 14, Mississippi State Senators stopped Medicaid Expansion by delaying the vote and letting the bill die in committee. Mississippi is one of ten holdout states that has not expanded Medicaid. They made the right decision. 

A decade ago, Medicaid expansion was promised as a “free lunch.” Instead, the expansion resulted in massive strains on federal and state budgets and no improvements in the quality of healthcare. Both Indiana and New York expanded Medicaid a decade ago and are struggling to fund it. 

In Indiana, an April 2023 forecasting error resulted in a massive Medicaid shortfall. What was expected to be a $570 million surplus was, in fact, a $1 billion deficit. The faults of the April forecast came from using older 2023 data as well as unanticipated demand for various forms of long-term care like nursing homes, at-home disability care, and assisted living facilities. Legislators in Indianapolis have withdrawn $271 million in state reserves and considered altering funding for long-term care to make up for the budget shortfall.

New York, a state known for large contributions to Medicaid, has its own budget woes with the program. New York   contributed $29.6 billion (just over $1,500 per New York resident) of state tax dollars to Medicaid in FY 2022, second only to California. Research shows that New York is also the state with the highest per capita spending on Medicaid and medical care generally. For all its public healthcare spending, hospitals in the Empire State rate poorly, frequently below average for hospital quality, and among the worst states for hospital safety.

Medicaid made up 10% ($607.7 billion) of the 2023 federal budget, funding, on average, 71.3% of traditional Medicaid and 90% of the Medicaid Expansion created under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This means the federal government provides more generous support to able-bodied adults covered under the expansion than to those who are most vulnerable and in the greatest need of care.

As the federal budget is strained by debt and interest payments, Washington will cut funding to the states, expect state leaders to deal with the funding issues, and let them take the blame for the inevitable spending cuts. This process has already begun. 

The bonus federal payments of 6.1% offered under the CARES Act expired December 31, 2023. At the end of March, federal funds to hospitals will begin to be cut and the hatchet will continue to swing thru FY 2027. Research shows that this will be a massive hit to state budgets, especially the ten remaining states that have not expanded Medicaid. That pressure pushed voters in South Dakota to approve expansion in 2022.

DC does not have the money to keep throwing at Medicaid. Fortunately, solutions are available. One important provision is including work requirements to receive Medicaid. State Senators in Mississippi delayed Medicaid expansion precisely because an agreement could not be reached on work requirements.

On X (formerly Twitter), Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves stated, “I also appreciate Senate leadership for not rushing head first into expansion. Recognizing the need for a true work requirement is a good first step!”

There are also other possible fixes. The federal government should stop giving more generous support to Medicaid expansion than traditional Medicaid, cut red tape, and allow states the flexibility to provide innovative healthcare solutions to enrollees. And, certainly, the federal government should limit Medicaid to low-income Americans.

Research shows, though, that the best way to improve Medicaid solvency is to reduce improper payments. Since Medicaid was expanded under the ACA, improper payments have skyrocketed. Able-bodied adults on Medicaid should be empowered to move off the dole and into private health coverage. 

Ultimately, solutions require the necessary political will to achieve them. Unfortunately, the political will to cut spending rapidly evaporates when spending cuts threaten politicians, especially in an election year. Eventually, they will no longer be able to ignore the problem. Solutions are available, but time to solve the problem before a crisis happens is rapidly running out.

https://townhall.com/columnists/thomas-savidge/2024/03/25/states-are-waking-up-to-the-medicaid-expansion-trap-n2636873?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=15803c7fc8c68b6fd1f0a5e7f4b59fc49df45d48335d4339ad60f7b0a0c7404d&recip=28668535

White House Absurdly Claims Biden Won't Let GOP 'Defund the Police,' Other Preposterous Nonsense

White House Absurdly Claims Biden Won't Let GOP 'Defund the Police,' Other Preposterous Nonsense

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Buck-passing, which embattled Joe Biden has honed to a tee throughout his miserably failed presidency, is one thing; flipping the script on the "Defund the Police" movement and now trying to blame it on the Republicans — and vowing to stop the GOP from doing so — is off-the-charts Looney Tunes. 

Then again, Joe Biden.

As exclusively reported by Fox News, the opening sentence reads like satire:

The White House is blasting House Republicans and accusing them of taking steps to defund the police while claiming President Biden will protect law enforcement and support crime-reducing programs. 

Farcical — on several fronts.

First, of course, it was Democrat city officials across America who ushered in the insanity of the Defund movement in the aftermath of George Floyd's death and subsequent left-wing riots.

Second, to suggest that the Republican Party owns record violent crime rates in this country — which run rampant in Democrat-run cities —is preposterous. 

Then again, Joe Biden.

According to Fox, the White House comments came after the House Republican Study Committee released its Fiscal Year 2025 budget proposal, "Fiscal Sanity to Save America."

White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates told Fox News Digital:

Violent crime surged under President Biden’s predecessor, but this president immediately fought back and has now reversed that trend with a historic reduction in crime.

[Biden took] unprecedented action to hire waves of police officers, [and] invest in crime effective crime reduction strategies and mental health services.

Bates then went full-metal stand-up comedian:

Joe Biden won’t let Congressional Republicans defund the police, abolish law enforcement agencies like the FBI, gut crime prevention, or roll back landmark legislation critical to the fight against gun crime.

Memo to the White House: The GOP has zero intention of "defunding the police" — and you know it.

Next up, Bates trotted out one of the Democrat's favorite misnomers — made "popular" by Barack Obama, ad nauseam — "investments." (Translation: Spending taxpayer money, deficit-spending, increases the national debt.

The deputy press secretary ludicrously referred to Biden's failed America Rescue Plan, which he claimed has "invested" more than $15 billion "to keep their communities safe and prevent crime." 

These include investments to avoid cuts to police budgets, hire more police officers for safe, effective, and accountable community policing, ensure first responders have the equipment they need to do their jobs, and expand community violence intervention and prevention programs.

The President’s budget also funds his Safer American Plan, including providing for hiring 100,000 additional police officers for effective, accountable community policing. [Biden] wants to deploy $17.7 billion for DOJ law enforcement, including $2.0 billion, an increase of over 30 percent since 2021, for the ATF.

Where does one — a rational one — begin? 

While Democrats tout spending increases, they ignore the dramatic rise in crime across America. Moreover, while they disingenuously boast about so-called crime reduction during Biden's presidency, they fail to mention Democrats' "soft on crime" initiatives in major cities — and decriminalization of some crimes, which impact overall crime rate statistics. 

The Republican Study Committee isn't having it. RSC Director Joe Bery told Fox:

Conservatives versus Biden on crime — the record couldn’t be more different. RSC’s budget doesn’t subsidize sanctuary cities or local entities who [that] have embraced the defund the police movement. We are committed to upholding the rule of law.

A spokesman for House Speaker Mike Johnson concurred:

[Republicans] oppose President Biden’s disastrous budget, which would raise taxes by $5 trillion and create the largest debt-to-GDP ratio in history.

In contrast, the House GOP budget would reduce deficits by trillions and balance the budget over the next decade, while protecting Social Security and Medicare.

And thee we have it.

The Bottom Line

It's not difficult to understand the differences between the beliefs of the left and those of the right. 

While liberals continue to believe, without facts, they can tax and spend the country to prosperity, which hasn't happened in the history of mankind, true conservatives believe in lower taxes, less government control, more economic freedom, and actions vs. words (and higher taxes) in the battle against violent crime.

Then again, Joe Biden.

https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2024/03/26/white-house-absurdly-claims-biden-wont-let-gop-defund-the-police-other-preposterous-nonsense-n2171894?utm_source=rsmorningbriefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=333548a2571394d78f5984884e55069e

Bidenomics Sucks, And So Does Joe And All Democrats

Bidenomics Sucks, And So Does Joe And All Democrats

Derek Hunter

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

It’s weird watching Democrats try to convince Americans they simply don’t know how good they’ve got it. They cite random data points to insist people are uneasy and unable to pay their bills only because of their imagination. Of course, as I always say, if you control the unit of measure, you control everything. They cherry-pick data to make a general case that doesn’t come anywhere close to registering with individuals. It's a lie by sleight of hand, and it will never work for anyone with half a brain cell in their head.

So, what do they point to to convince everyone they’ve got it made? One of those things makes them a special kind of evil – it’s the stock market.

When Donald Trump was President, he was constantly pointing out when the stock market would hit a new record high. When he did it, Democrats would mock it, screaming about how most Americans weren’t in the stock market, seemingly forgetting about 401(k)s. 

Even with that, however, Democrats attacked the idea that a record Dow Jones Industrial Average meant anything other than rich people getting richer.

Now, they’re touting a record stock market as a sign that Americans have it really good under Joe Biden. Hearing a leftist extol the virtues of a high stock market is odd, and then talking about how people’s 401(k)s is hilarious, especially when they’re trying to appeal to people under 60. 

Honestly, telling anyone not retired or about to be that they have it good because something they’re years away from being able to collect on is doing well at that moment shows a level of tone-deafness that might set a record. Young people are actually dipping into their retirement accounts because they can’t afford to buy a house pay rent or just make ends meet, so they’re paying a substantial tax penalty to survive. Bidenomics in action. 

You can’t take your 401(k) into a grocery store and make food more affordable, the Dow hitting 40,000 doesn’t make necessities cheaper or salaries higher, it just makes people who donate to Joe Biden’s reelection campaign recoup in short order the cash they gave to keep the person responsible for the misery in power. Gas prices remain unchanged in this scenario.

Yet, this seems to be a cornerstone of Biden’s campaign: accounts you can’t touch without paying through the nose, and can’t collect on until you’re retired, are up. So, if nothing changes in the ensuing 20-30 years, you should be grateful and vote for grandpa's hair-sniffer…or something. 

The more they tout the stock market, the more it is important to remember something they may well have forgotten, but you never should – they’ve kept you out of it as best they can. Every point they claim is an indication of how well the economy is doing should be a reminder of the money they kept you from having.

Back in 2005, President George W. Bush proposed allowing Americans, if they chose to, to invest a tiny percentage of their Social Security money in the stock market. Unlike the Ponzi Scheme the government completely controls, this would be money people could pass along to their heirs if they should pass away. The Democrats hated every little bit of this concept. 

“There is no crisis,” they yelled. This was an attempt to “privatize Social Security” to make the rich even richer, they said. They never really said how. 

They also claimed it would put Social Security money at risk somehow. The only way that could be – taking money out of it – is if it were the Ponzi Scheme they’ve always denied it was. 

But that’s neither here nor there, just think about how much more money your retirement could have had Democrats not blocked this plan. At the time, the stock market was around 10,000, now it’s almost 40,000. Would you like to have quadrupled your money over those ensuing years? Better yet, would you like to have invested in companies that did much better than that over that time? The possibilities were endless before Democrats limited them to none.

NOW they have the nerve to brag about the stock market and say that, somehow, means the people they excluded from engaging in it are better off than they were 4 years ago, back when they could afford to buy a house, fill up their gas tank AND feed their families? Hell no!

Bidenomics sucks, Joe Biden sucks, Democrats suck. If you’re having any economic problems, it is their doing. If you can’t find a job, if an illegal alien is getting tax money for their housing, food, and general life, that’s because Democrats favor them over you. If you can’t fill your car with gas, can’t pay your rent, can’t afford a home, can’t buy much beyond ramen without making sacrifices elsewhere, thank a Democrat, especially Joe Biden. 

And remember that feeling, even if your situation improves slightly by November, or you get used to the pain. Never forget what they’ve done, because while they’re scrambling to make changes to help their reelection chances, the damage Joe Biden will do if he wins and never has to face voters again will be much, much worse. 

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2024/03/24/bidenomics-sucks-and-so-does-joe-and-all-democrats-n2636902?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=15803c7fc8c68b6fd1f0a5e7f4b59fc49df45d48335d4339ad60f7b0a0c7404d&recip=28668535

Thursday, March 28, 2024

Biden's Border Blowup

Biden's Border Blowup

Victor Davis Hanson

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

Some 8 to 10 million illegal aliens from all over the world, as expected, have flooded across the border since President Joe Biden took office.

A demagogic candidate Biden, remember, in 2019 invited those massing at the southern border to "surge" into the United States without specifying that they first needed legal sanction: "We immediately surge to the border all those seeking asylum."

In contrast, we know legal immigration is America's great strength, but it has always depended on a few key prerequisites.

Immigration must be legal and measured.

Why? Because only the host nation can adjudicate how many immigrants it can successfully accept and assimilate. It has no desire to encourage Balkanized tribalism so common in nations abroad torn apart by ethnic conflict.

America must have some knowledge of the background of immigrants, especially whether they have criminal records, belong to gangs, are importing drugs, carry infectious diseases, or can be self-supporting.

By contrast, if the first thing immigrants do is illegally cross the American border, and the second is to reside illegally in America, and the third is to obtain fraudulent identification to mask that illegality, then they will establish long patterns of illegal behavior and disrespect for their hosts.

In addition, immigration should be diverse so that large ethnic groups do not form permanent tribal sects in the fashion of the Balkans, the Middle East, or Latin America.

Ideally, the host should prefer immigrants who have some knowledge of the language and customs of the United States. And they should have some ability to be self-supporting so as not to burden American taxpayers or overtax and deprive social services from poorer U.S. citizens.

As for the host?

America must be confident enough in and knowledgeable enough about its values, customs, and traditions to demand immigrants integrate rapidly into the body politic of the United States.

Both the host and immigrants must agree on the basic facts of immigration.

Immigrants, not the host, have chosen to leave their native land to risk a new life and identity in America.

Therefore, the relationship is, by nature, asymmetrical. The host has a perfect right, indeed a responsibility, to impose its own values upon newcomers -- not vice versa.

Otherwise, if immigrants do not absorb their newly adopted culture, why would they have left and, in some sense, rejected their homeland in the first place?

To replicate in the United States the very conditions and environment that they so eagerly fled from back home?

So the host must remind immigrants that they chose a completely different paradigm from their native country. And therefore, they must be helped to embrace an entirely new national identity.

Unfortunately, in the last four years, the Biden administration has violated every historical canon critical to ensuring legal immigration enriches the United States.

They have encouraged 8-10 million of the world's poorest to flood the border and to enter and reside in America without legal sanction.

Most have no prior experience with American traditions, and few speak English.

Host Americans have no idea whether hundreds, thousands, or even tens of thousands of the millions entering illegally have committed crimes in their native countries, or have any record of employment, or are sick, or are here to foment gangs and to import lethal, foreign-made drugs that kill some 100,000 Americans a year.

Worse, we, the hosts, no longer believe in the melting pot that once made America the world's only successful multiracial democracy, united by the laws of the Constitution and the unique values that emanate from it.

The combination of mass illegal immigration, without audit, into a country beset with $35 trillion in national debt, an existing 50 million residents not born in the United States, and without confidence in rapid assimilation certainly explains the disaster of illegal immigration that now manifests daily.

Biden may think nullifying federal immigration law is a smart political trick that, in the past, may have flipped southwestern states from red to blue or warped the census to give blue states more congressional districts.

Or he may assume that with 70 percent of the electorate now voting through poorly audited mail-in balloting, there is no real way to prevent foreign nationals from voting for those who neutered the law to let them in.

But in truth, Biden is unfortunately undermining support for all immigration, legal or otherwise. He is guaranteeing that more imported drugs and gang members will kill more Americans.

Ironically, Biden is also alienating from the Democratic Party its once loyal Black and Latino voters. They, not the party elite, must deal concretely with the consequences of Biden's callous and cynical, ideologically driven policies.

Perhaps the Left will only cease destroying immigration law when it realizes that for each illegal alien it invites in, it will lose one or more once loyal Democratic voters.

https://townhall.com/columnists/victordavishanson/2024/03/22/bidens-border-blowup-n2636835

BYD: Here Comes the EV Bloodbath Trump Warned Us About

BYD: Here Comes the EV Bloodbath Trump Warned Us About

AP Photo/Jeff Dean

Donald Trump was right. It's going to be a bloodbath when China's BYD starts selling its "fun-to-drive" Seagull EV in this country at a price not even Tesla can match. 

The five-door hatchback doesn't have the best range or fanciest amenities. But what it does have is a top price under $14,000, good safety features, aggressive looks, and plenty of financial backing from Beijing. BYD's specialties are batteries and high-tech manufacturing, and they're using both to aggressively expand overseas production and deliveries. 

An improved version for South American markets, called the Dolphin Mini, is already on sale, starting at $21,990. 

“What we’ve seen over time is automotive manufacturers eventually enter all the markets that matter... Ultimately the Chinese will come to the U.S.,” Marin Gjaja—chief operating officer for Ford's EV unit — told CNBC in an interview last week.

The Alliance for American Manufacturing said in February, "The introduction of cheap Chinese autos—which are so inexpensive because they are backed with the power and funding of the Chinese government—to the American market could end up being an extinction-level event for the U.S. auto sector."

Some might call it a bloodbath.

Of course, it doesn't have to be a bloodbath. If there is a bloodbath, it will be on us, not China.

The market for tiny urban EVs probably isn't all that huge. Given the choice, Americans tend to prefer larger, more luxurious, more powerful cars and trucks. But we'll be denied our preferences, starting in 2027, under new emissions regulations announced this week by the Biden administration. Like it or not, our cars and trucks are going to be smaller EVs or hybrids. That means the Big Three will have to go toe-to-toe against the dirt-cheap Seagull.

That's how ostensibly well-meaning regulation (with a very hard and heavy accent on "ostensibly") hurts American manufacturing and benefits our overseas competitors. We went through the same thing with Japan in the 1970s, as the EPA forced the Big Three to compete against Japan's strengths in fuel-efficient econoboxes instead of allowing American manufacturers to play to their own strengths.

The Big Three owned a combined 75% of the U.S. auto market in 1984. Forty years later, that's down to 40%. While it's true that Detroit and the UAW are the authors of many of their own troubles, Washington has been there to demand the exact wrong thing at every step along the way of their fall from grace.

I'm old enough to remember when people said China would never be able to sell cars in the West. That's changing quickly. I'm still told China will never sell passenger jets outside of China but that's changing, too. Chinese engineering is no longer limited to cheap, unreliable, short-lived copies of Western products. Chinese engineering schools are damned good, and that's showing up more and more in improved high-tech products, civilian and military.

This country's engineering schools trained the people who now run China's schools, so none of this should come as any surprise.

And yet it does surprise us again and again.

https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2024/03/22/byd-here-comes-the-bloodbath-trump-warned-us-about-n4927550

ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE

ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE

BY JOHN HINDERAKER IN FAKE NEWSMEDIAMEDIA BIAS

When we started this site, exposing mainstream media bias was a big part of our mission. Using the then-new internet, we and many others held liberal outlets (i.e., virtually all of them) accountable in a way that hadn’t happened before. The effect of that effort was not that the liberal press became more accurate or more objective. Rather, they came out of the closet. For the most part, they no longer make any serious pretense of neutrality. Whether that is an improvement or not is debatable.

But, in any event, it no longer makes sense to criticize, say, the New York Times or the Washington Post for being biased. That would be like, if you were a soldier in World War II and a Panzer division was approaching, you were to say, “Those Germans are biased against us!” It isn’t a question of bias. They are just the enemy.

Donald Trump was perhaps the first major Republican politician to abandon the effort to curry favor with the press establishment. He famously denounced the fake news press (sometimes abbreviated to the press in general) as enemies of the people. The good news is, most Americans agree with him.

Rasmussen finds that Trump’s characterization is the majority view:

60% of Likely U.S. Voters agree that the media are “truly the enemy of the people,” as Trump said in 2019, including 30% who Strongly Agree. Thirty-six percent (36%) disagree, including 21% who Strongly Disagree.

That is an extraordinary finding. Respondents were asked this question:

Do you agree or disagree with this statement: The media are “truly the enemy of the people”?

And a clear majority said that they agree. The press has utterly squandered whatever respect it once enjoyed.

The Rasmussen survey also asked about the Democrats’ “bloodbath” hoax:

Former President Donald Trump recently said that it would be a “bloodbath” if he didn’t win in November. Which is more likely, that he was talking about auto workers losing jobs or that he was talking about widespread political violence by his supporters?

The result:

Forty-nine percent (49%) of voters believe Trump was talking about auto workers losing jobs when he warned of a “bloodbath,” while 40% think Trump was talking about widespread political violence by his supporters if he did not win the election. Eleven percent (11%) are not sure.

Basically, Democrats follow the Democratic Party press and swallow the Democrats’ talking points:

Among voters who Strongly Approve of Biden’s job performance as president, 78% believe Trump’s “bloodbath” comment was about widespread political violence by his supporters if he did not win the election. By contrast, among voters who Strongly Disapprove of Biden’s performance, 84% think Trump was referring to auto workers losing jobs.

But again, returning to good news, most voters believe that the media’s coverage is driven by the Biden administration’s talking points:

Among all Likely Voters, 63% believe it is likely that the major news media’s political coverage is dictated by talking points from the Biden campaign, including 42% who say it’s Very Likely. Twenty-nine percent (29%) don’t think it’s likely media coverage is dictated by the Biden campaign, including 11% who say it’s Not At All Likely.

Majorities of every political category – 78% of Republicans, 50% of Democrats and 61% of unaffiliated voters – believe it’s at least somewhat likely that the major news media’s political coverage is dictated by talking points from the Biden campaign.

So even half of Democrats admit that the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Associated Press are servants of the Democratic Party. The bottom line is that the liberal press serves certain functions on behalf of the Democratic Party: it reinforces Democrats’ talking points and keeps Democratic voters riled up. Those are valuable contributions, to be sure. But the days when the liberal media could actually drive public opinion are long gone.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/03/enemies-of-the-people.php

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

The Smell of Mendacity

The Smell of Mendacity

Alyssa Pointer/Pool Photo via AP

"What's that smell in this room? Didn't you notice it, B rick? Didn't you notice a powerful and obnoxious odor of mendacity in this room? There ain't nothin' more powerful than the odor of mendacity. You can smell it. It smells like death."- (Big Daddy in"Cat on a Hot Tin Roof")

Court decisions can sound complicated because they sometimes contain legal language that is difficult for a layperson to understand. That's not the situation in the case of Fulton County, Georgia's District Attorney Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Judge Scott McAfee gave Willis a choice - either dump Wade, with whom she'd had a romantic relationship, as prosecutor in the case against Donald Trump, or leave the case herself. Wade quickly tendered his resignation. It's hard to see how anyone except the most strident anti-Trumper will see the outcome of a trial with Willis on the case as fair.

The judge's ruling contained a word one rarely hears used these days. McAfee wrote that while a conflict of interest wasn't proved, "an odor of mendacity remains."

For those who didn't get far with vocabulary in high school English class, mendacity is defined as " untruthfulness; tendency to lie."

Most people are familiar with the courtroom oath to "tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." Judge McAfee concluded Willis and Wade were not telling the whole truth, but the case could go forward anyway even while their relationship carried "the appearance of impropriety."

If one is engaging in behavior that appears inappropriate to a judge, doesn't that potentially taint the outcome of a case in the public's eyes?

Judge McAfee's ruling is reminiscent of two other cases. FBI Director James Comey declined to prosecute Hillary Clinton for her mishandling of classified information while she was secretary of state. The New York Times reported: "Comey rebuked Mrs. Clinton as being 'extremely careless' in using a private email address and server. He raised questions about her judgment, contradicted statements she has made about her email practices, (and) said it was possible that hostile foreign governments had gained access to her account."

Then there was what Special Counsel Robert Hur said about Joe Biden's careless handling of classified documents during his time in the Senate, as vice president and until he became president. After five hours of interviewing Biden over two days, Hur concluded that Biden didn't break the law and besides, a jury in heavily Democratic Washington would be unlikely to convict him because he would be viewed as a "well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory."

Biden wasn't elderly when he began stashing documents in unsecured locations. Under the law he was not supposed to have them and didn't have the power in his previous posts to declassify them.

Is this the new standard for high government officials who violate laws that are supposed to protect classified documents? If so, Congress needs to re-write the laws and include the rest of us under their protection.

These cases will only fuel the growing belief that there is a two-tiered justice system in America. It also further undermines what is becoming a cliche - that "no one is above the law."

One does not have to be a supporter of Donald Trump, as his former vice president Mike Pence announced last week he is not, to have the view that Trump is being treated "unfairly," as he likes to say, and that the 91 felony charges he must fight with his own money, as opposed to the endless cash governments can spend, has placed him at a disadvantage.

No one seems to mind that mendacity, while always present in the political arena, appears to be increasing everywhere. If allowed to spread it will create a "smell like death" in our legal system.

https://townhall.com/columnists/calthomas/2024/03/19/the-smell-of-mendacity-n2636654?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=15803c7fc8c68b6fd1f0a5e7f4b59fc49df45d48335d4339ad60f7b0a0c7404d&recip=28668535