Sunday, July 30, 2023

FEINSTEIN WATCH

FEINSTEIN WATCH

BY JOHN HINDERAKER IN DEMOCRATSJUDICIAL NOMINEESJUDICIARYSENATE

It has been obvious for quite a while that Dianne Feinstein is not capable of discharging her duties as a senator. Earlier today Feinstein became confused in a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing and began reading a statement instead of casting a vote. An aide tried to help her, and Patty Murray audibly said, “Just say ‘aye.'”

I haven’t paid much attention to the Feinstein saga because it is not surprising when an elderly senator hangs on to his or her seat. Robert Byrd had to be carried into the Senate chamber to vote. Arlen Spector, an 80-year-old cancer survivor, switched parties to run as a Democrat (unsuccessfully) rather than retire from the Senate. So Feinstein’s tenacity is nothing new.

But it turns out there is more to it. Via Stacey Matthews at Legal Insurrection, Sheldon Whitehouse explains:


More from another rabid Democrat:


So without Feinstein, the Democrats would not have a majority on the Senate Judiciary Committee. They would need Republican consent–60 votes–to put a new Democrat on the committee. And absent a committee majority, judicial nominees cannot advance without at least one Republican vote. That might be no problem with most nominees, but it would be hard to get a Republican vote for a radical nominee, especially to a Court of Appeals.

If the situation were reversed, do you think Democrats would go along with putting a new Republican on the Judiciary Committee? I don’t think so, either. The Democrats assume Republicans will act the way they would, and thus they need Feinstein to stay in the Senate as long as she is able to say the word “Aye.”

Democrats are now denouncing Senate Republicans as heartless, although the Republicans so far haven’t done anything at all. It is the Democrats who are forcing an obviously impaired and failing woman to stick to her position for their benefit. And, as one of the tweeters in the Legal Insurrection post points out, it was a mistake by Democrats to put Feinstein on the Judiciary Committee again in the current Congress, when they knew that her health and cognitive abilities had failed badly.

So it isn’t pretty, but that is where we are in the brutal game of Washington politics.

STEVE adds: Tonight Feinstein’s staff had to tell her repeatedly to vote “Yes” on a committee rollcall vote on a budget item and stop her from making an irrelevant speech:


Saturday, July 29, 2023

Law Professor Knows Exactly Why the Media Want the GOP to 'Move on' From Biden Scandal

Law Professor Knows Exactly Why the Media Want the GOP to 'Move on' From Biden Scandal

AP Photo/Susan Walsh

When the media is resigned to delivering this line on the emerging Joe Biden bribery scandal, you know we got them. It’s no longer citing letters from former spooks to discredit the evidence. The FBI has been neutralized since they turned over the FD-1023 report from their confidential human source, who delivered credible information about this scheme, the first report filed in 2018. The IRS whistleblowers highlighted the Biden Justice Department’s repeated attempts to hinder the prosecution of the president’s son. At the same time, a former associate of Hunter is set to testify about how Joe was directly involved in these shady government access deals. 

Here's the media line: “Move on.” 

Sorry, that’s not possible. The president is neck-deep in a bribery scandal. He tried to use his lawyers at DOJ to stop investigations into his son because it would circle back to him. These actions are impeachable. It’s undoubtedly more incriminating than anything Democrats manufactured against Trump in their two impeachment attempts. Every source is credible. All the evidence is confirmed and corroborated. The media knows this is now a story, but they can’t pivot. And Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) is the stuttering mess of a lawyer from My Cousin Vinny. During his question period, he destroyed the Biden defense to ask questions of the IRS whistleblowers Joseph Zeigler and Gary Shapley. 

Goldman exposed that Joe Biden was involved in the dealings, inflicting what law professor Jonathan Turley described as “Dresden-level” damage to any legal defense the Bidens could offer. 

And the plea deal that Hunter Biden got for the tax evasion and gun charges doesn’t mean anything; they were politically motivated. Hence, the whistleblower hearing, where Democrats could do nothing but declare there was no evidence, richly allege that Hunter was a victim of a two-tiered justice system and roped Emmett Till into the mix. They can only whine because they know Joe and Hunter are cooked. As Turley noted, the public isn’t “moving on.” The Archer testimony is yet another nail in the coffin:

That question from CBS’s “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan to Republican presidential candidate Chris Christie was raised just days before a former business associate of Hunter Biden, Devon Archer, gives potentially explosive testimony to a House committee in the Biden corruption scandal. 

The media’s desire to “move on” from the scandal is reaching an almost frantic level, as millions in foreign payments and dozens of corporate shell companies are revealed, and incriminating emails are released. 

The same plaintive demand was made in congressional hearings. 

[…] 

Others insisted that the allegations were still “unproven” or “unverified” while showing the same lack of interest in establishing the truth. 

Notably, these same media outlets did wall-to-wall coverage of the false Russian collusion claims in the Steele dossier. 

They are now simply shrugging off what could be one of the most serious corruption scandals in modern history despite the testimony of highly credible whistleblowers and thousands of pages of supporting evidence. 

None of this is going to work, of course. The public has long ago lost trust in the media. Indeed, the “Let’s Go, Brandon” movement is as much a mocking of the media as it is the president.   

Polls show that the public is not “moving on” and now views this as a major scandal. A majority believes that Hunter has received special protection in the investigation. While the media can continue to suppress the evidence and allegations within their own echo-chambered platforms, truth, like water, has a way of finding a way out. 

The scandal is moving forward with or without the media. 

But it will be delicious to watch their meltdowns. We warned you Joe was a dirty creep.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2023/07/25/law-professor-knows-exactly-why-the-media-wants-the-gop-to-move-on-from-biden-scandal-n2626195

They So Want Climate Change to Be a Thing

They So Want Climate Change to Be a Thing

 

AP Photo/Susan Walsh

Oh my goodness, it was warm during the summer! Not just warm, but the warmest warm that ever was! Yes, it’s an emergency, a crisis, the mostest baddest hotness that ever happened in the history of ever. Time to give up plastic straws and cars and hot water heaters – that’s the latest one – because Professional Licensed Scientists™ tell us we must, or else the penguins will burst into flames. Or something.

Climate change is #Science, and you know that because the very same people who lied to you about literally everything else, from Wall Street to Iraq to the Wuhan Flu, told you so. By the way, they are now grudgingly sort of admitting it was from the Wuhan lab after denying it for years and calling you a racist for thinking that a bat-virus respiratory disease that happened to originate within a few blocks of a major Chinese lab doing bat-virus respiratory disease might have something to do with the major Chinese lab doing bat-virus respiratory disease instead of with people nibbling on whatever pangolins are.

Now, hurry up and forget the unbroken track record of lies our institutions have told us and quickly sign over your money and freedom to the same people who have lied to you non-stop for decades. Remember, it’s #Science, although the application of the scientific method, as it was understood before it became a political bludgeon to pummel you into submission and serfdom, would call for us to look at the data, and all the data tells us that everything the people pushing climate change have told us about everything else is a lie and a scam. Accordingly, Occam’s razor – not the thing Hunter uses to line up his yeyo on the mirror but the principle that the simplest answer is probably the right answer – would indicate that this is yet another lie designed to steal our freedom and money. 

By the way, the Venn diagram of institutional actors telling you that we have to make all sorts of sacrifices because of climate change RIGHT NOW, NO TIME TO WAIT OR DEBATE, and telling you that Hunter’s laptop was disinformation is a circle.

Understand what we are talking about. It is not whether the climate changes. It does. It has been hotter and colder because it goes in cycles. When we say climate change is a hoax – and it is one of the most pernicious hoaxes in the history of humanity, right up there with socialism – we are referring to the claim and attendant actions based on the lie that climate change is essentially manmade and that these changes require the immediate transformation of society into a form that just happens to match the form of society these people wanted long before they started talking about global warming, and even before they were trying to do exactly the same things because of alleged global cooling.  

The climate change hoax is a vehicle for change they cannot impose any other way, and if you notice, these people are trying to get this change done in every way except the democratic one. They cannot win and, therefore, do not try to even bother with votes on the myriad horrible things they want to do to us in the name of controlling the weather. Most of it is regulatory, behind-the-scenes crap like bans on toilets that flush and light bulbs that light. Or it is executive orders – anything but flat-out democratic processes because they would have to face questions. Questions they cannot answer because their whole garbage movement is based on a lie. 

So, what is the right temperature for the Earth? Like, in specific degrees? I mean, if it’s getting “too hot” or “too cold” – again, I was alive in the seventies when that was #Science – then what degrees are “just right,” Goldilocks?

So, is man’s activity the primary factor controlling the rate and direction of climate change? What was when the Earth got cooler and warmer, and why are those non-factors now?

If it gets a couple of degrees warmer, so what? Instead of making major changes to society – again, Marxist ones that you want anyway – what is the dollar figure for amelioration as opposed to the dollar figure for transformative societal change?

China’s bringing on a coal plant every week or so – why again is my water heater going to cause the Earth to burst into flames?

So, meat is now bad, and we’re constantly told that the future is delicious bugs. We’re told that our cars and trucks are bad and we need to take public transportation. We’re told that our vacations are Earth murder. But I am kind of thinking that these sacrifices are only to come from us. Hey, if rising sea levels are so scary, why did the Obamas buy a beach house? Why do Leonardo DiCaprio and Frankenstein Kerry fly private jests to their climate summits? Why are normal Americans the ones who need to carry this burden instead of rich people or the damn Chi-Coms?

I know, I know – shut up and listen to the scientists. Those would be the ones who demanded we shut down our schools and wear masks? The same ones who swore to us the vaxx would prevent transmission? I’ve noticed a distinct lack of accountability for all the errors and lies they told us, so why again should I believe that if the scientists are wrong about #Science needing us to turn our country into a socialist green feudal nightmare there will be no accountability for that either? You know, maybe it’s not #Science, but I’ve noticed how people who lie and get away with it tend to lie again because they think they can get away with it.

So, save your climate idiocy. You get nothing except me idling my engine some more, even though your lies have resulted in gas being $5 a gallon. We need a president who will not play, which means a Republican one. Add “defeating the climate change hoax” to the list of reasons why we must get serious about nominating the strongest Republican in the general election. That is unless you want to eat bugs and ride buses with hobos.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2023/07/26/they-so-want-climate-change-to-be-a-thing-n2626130?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&recip=28668535

Biden Lords Over America’s Heaven and Hell Justice System

 Biden Lords Over America’s Heaven and Hell Justice System

Joe Biden has become President Meat Axe. At his inauguration, Biden promised to “restore the soul and to secure the future of America.” How? “Unity. Unity.”

But rather than unification, Biden has cleaved this country like a butcher splitting a side of beef.

Even before Biden’s Department of Justice gave his son, Hunter, a wrist massage for tax evasion and gun violations on Tuesday, the DOJ perpetrated yet another hideous act of division. 

Biden on June 6 let Justice indict former President Donald J. Trump on 37 felony counts related to alleged mishandling of classified documents. In a deed both unprecedented in U.S. history and unworthy of America’s institutional norms, a sitting president has threatened the de facto leader of the opposition with up to 400 years in prison on extremely dubious accusations. 

The Biden administration has transformed the words that adorn the U.S. Supreme Court — “Equal Justice Under Law” — from hallowed principle to punchline and, now, cruel taunt, akin to Cato the Elder’s oft-spoken closing line: “Carthago delende est,” or “Carthage must be destroyed.” The only thing missing from the Supreme Court’s facade is “LOL.”

Trump is learning all too vividly that America lacks equal justice. The Land of the Free now includes a Heaven and Hell justice system: Heaven for Democrats and Hell for Republicans.

Consider:

  • President Bill Clinton recorded audio tapes, with the help of Oval Office staffers, in which he and historian Taylor Branch discussed U.S. policy in Bosnia, Cuba, Haiti, Somalia, and elsewhere. Clinton stashed tapes of these 79 meetings in his White House sock drawer and took them home when his presidency ended.

Judicial Watch sued for those tapes, as its attorney, Michael Bekesha, explained in the Wall Street Journal on June 13, 2023: “[T]he Justice Department argued that NARA [National Archives and Records Administration] doesn’t have ‘a duty to engage in a never-ending search for potential presidential records’ that weren’t provided to NARA by the president at the end of his term.”

“The government’s position was that Congress had decided that the president and the president alone decides what is a presidential record and what isn’t,” Bekesha wrote. “He may take with him whatever records he chooses at the end of his term.” (READ MORE: Historic Trump Arraignment Puts the Justice Department on Trial)

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson agreed. The Presidential Records Act “does not confer any mandatory or even discretionary authority on the Archivist to classify records,” she ruled on March 1, 2012. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President.”

So, as Bekesha concluded: “Mr. Clinton took the tapes, and no one could do anything about it.”

According to Gen. Hugh Shelton, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Pentagon officials went to the White House “around 2000” to confer with a staffer and replace Clinton’s nuclear-launch codes. Shelton wrote, “At this point we learned that the aide had no idea where the old ones were, because they had been missing for months.” This mind-blowing security breach stayed secret for 10 years, until Shelton revealed it in his 2010 memoir. Neither Bill Clinton nor anyone else paid any price for losing America’s nuclear-launch codes!

  • John M. Deutch, Clinton’s CIA director from May 1995 to December 1996, had 31 classified files on his unsecured home computer. Deutch damn well knew better. Regardless, the Justice Department decided not to prosecute him for mishandling state secrets. Instead, in August 1999, CIA Director George Tenet indefinitely suspended Deutch’s security clearance.
  • Speaking of socks, Clinton’s national security adviser, Sandy Berger, strolled out of the National Archives with classified materials stuffed into his socks — no joke — in May 2002 and fall 2003. He swiped these secret documents, thought to detail his boss’s dangerously ho hum attitude toward Osama bin Laden. Berger shredded these records with scissors.

Berger pleaded guilty to unauthorized removal and retention of classified material. This misdemeanor’s maximum sentence is one year in prison and a $100,000 fine. Under Berger’s March 2005 plea deal, he lost his security clearance for three years, paid $10,000, and spent zero time in jail.

  • Saying that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton mishandled classified materials is like calling the Grand Canyon a crack. Her criminal abuse of secrets could fill bookshelves. 

Hillary illegally maintained a do-it-yourself computer server in her Chappaqua, New York, mansion. It held a wealth of classified State Department emails. Here is how former FBI chief James Comey summarized its contents at a July 5, 2016, news conference:

From Hillary’s server, “110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional emails were ‘up-classified’ to make them Confidential.”

After GOP investigators on Capitol Hill subpoenaed Hillary’s server, she obstructed justice and stymied a congressional probe by shipping the computer to Platte River Networks, a Colorado facility that digitally sandblasted it with an erasure software called BleachBit. These emails were expunged so thoroughly that then-Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said, “Even God couldn’t read them.” Hillary also ordered her aides to demolish her cell phones with hammers. How Gambino!

Despite announcing that Hillary had 2,113 classified emails on her servers and devices, Comey infamously declared that “no reasonable prosecutor” would indict this career criminal. So, as has happened since the late 1970s, not even a snowflake landed on Hillary.

Even more outrageous, the first draft of Comey’s July 5, 2016, beatification of Hillary was dated May 2, 2016, while FBI agents on this case still were collecting subpoenaed evidence. They cataloged additional exhibits on May 13, 19, and 26.

Indeed, Comey penned his “Free Hillary!” speech before 12 to 17 separate witnesses had been questioned, including Hillary herself! She was not interrogated until that July 2 — two months after Comey wrote the remarks that kept her out of jail.

  • Houma Abedin, Hillary’s top State Department aide, was a sieve through which national secrets poured. Judicial Watch, whose Freedom of Information Act lawsuit liberated State documents, reported that “at least 18 classified emails” flowed from State’s secure computers to Hillary’s illegal server to the laptop that Abedin shared with her then-husband, disgraced former Democrat congressman and convicted pedophile Anthony Weiner of Brooklyn. 

“This classified material includes discussions about Saudi Arabia, The Hague, Egypt, South Africa, Zimbabwe, the identity of a CIA official, Malawi, the war in Syria, Lebanon, Hamas, and the PLO,” Judicial Watch explained in a Jan. 4, 2018 news release.

Secrets also dripped from Abedin’s Blackberry onto Weiner’s PC. She also leaked sensitive State passwords to her unprotected personal Yahoo account.

Having resigned from the House after a blindingly public sexting scandal, Weiner was wide open to potential blackmail by enemies, foreign or domestic.

“Listen up, Weiner,” some bad guy could have told him. “You’ve got 24 hours to put Houma’s secrets onto a thumb drive and hand them over. If not, a stack of photos of you in your birthday suit with some not-quite-legal girls will go straight to the New York Post. I bet they would put a juicy one on the front page, beneath the headline, ‘EXPOSED WEINER.’ What would Houma think of that?”

What penalty did Abedin pay for her grotesque abuse of classified material?

Zippo.

  • James Comey waltzed out of the FBI with classified material that alleged that Trump had ties to Moscow. “I needed to get that out into the public square,” Comey confessed to the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 8, 2017. So, he leaked this information to his friend Professor Daniel Richman of Columbia University Law School. Richman, in turn, forwarded these secrets to the so-called “Paper of Record,” which published this news. 

As Comey and Richman had conspired, this skullduggery triggered the DOJ’s special-counsel probe of Trump. This inquest hounded him for three years, until he ultimately was cleared of having Russian ties. Comey received no punishment for this evil scheme. Instead, he thrives as a lecturer and TV commentator.

  • Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty to furnishing falsified evidence to the top secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). On June 19, 2017, Clinesmith doctored a classified email to indicate that Trump campaign adviser Carter Page was “not a source” for U.S. intelligence. In fact, he was a source. Concealing this datum made Page’s contacts with Russians appear unjustifiably suspicious. Clinesmith’s fraud bamboozled the FISC, which then issued a surveillance warrant against Page and empowered Obama’s FBI to spy on the Trump campaign. This was Watergate without the break-in.

According to an Aug. 19, 2020, Justice Department press release, Clinesmith’s crime “carries a maximum term of imprisonment of five years.”

Never mind!

On Jan. 29, 2021, Clinesmith was sentenced to 12 months of probation and 400 hours of community service. He spent not even a nanosecond behind bars for this notorious crime.

  • Antony Blinken, according to former acting CIA Director Michael Morrell, triggered the 51 former intelligence officials whose October 2020 statement claimed that the New York Post’s exposé on Hunter Biden’s “laptop from Hell” contained “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” Blinken knew that this was a lie. In fact, he lied himself from the Biden campaign all the way into the Cabinet, where he is secretary of state.
  • Joe Biden illegally possessed some 20 classified papers gathered while he was a senator and vice president and lacked presidential declassification authority. Documents marked “classified” surfaced at the Penn-Biden Center, an alleged think tank, in Washington, D.C.’s Chinatown, and in the garage of Biden’s Wilmington, Delaware, mansion (beside his 1967 Corvette Stingray). “So, it’s not like they’re sitting out in the street,” Biden reassured journalists on Jan. 12.

Biden did not endure a Mar-a-Lago–style federal raid on his property, as Trump did. Instead, Biden’s private attorneys perused documents in his garage and at his Rehoboth beach house. Biden’s lawyers, not the FBI, decided which records were classified and which were not. ABC News reported, “[T]he personal lawyers who came across the initial classified document did not have a security clearance.”

So, far, Biden has faced absolutely no consequences whatsoever for mishandling state secrets that he illegally possessed. Like virtually every Democrat in this situation, he is skating as if in the Ice Capades.

Conversely, Republicans in these circumstances find themselves in a much warmer place: Hell.

Trump associates Paul Manafort and George Papadopoulos both spent time in prison for their roles in the holistically fabricated Russiagate hoax.

Trump political adviser Roger Stone suffered an armed FBI raid on his home in Florida. He faced time behind bars, as did former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn. Trump’s pardons spared them this injustice.

As for Trump, DOJ’s indictment completely ignores the Presidential Records Act, which — as the aforementioned “Clinton Socks Case” confirms — gives him unquestioned power to declassify whichever documents he wishes and keep those that he deems presidential. Biden’s abuse of Trump plagiarizes the legal standards in Cuba and Venezuela.

Joe Biden and previous leftists have taken America’s beloved equal-justice system and bludgeoned it into today’s Heaven for Democrats and Hell for Republicans. Given their recent actions, one wonders: Do Democrats want a civil war?

What Republicans want is not slavish excuse-making for anything and everything that Trump might or might not have done in his case.

What Trump supporters want is to live, once again, in a country where people are treated equally before the law, not massaged on the left and manhandled on the right.

To restore the now battered principle of Equal Justice Under Law, DOJ should keep prosecuting Trump and indict and prosecute Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Houma Abedin, James Comey, Antony Blinken, and every other Democrat who has abused state secrets.

If not, the Justice Department should continue to leave these Democrats untouched and immediately drop all federal charges against Donald J. Trump.

https://spectator.org/biden-lords-over-americas-heaven-and-hell-justice-system/