Tuesday, April 2, 2024

WATCH: Nicolle Wallace Has an Epic Meltdown Over Trump Not Being Held 'Accountable'

WATCH: Nicolle Wallace Has an Epic Meltdown Over Trump Not Being Held 'Accountable'

Townhall Media

We saw with the firing of Ronna McDaniel how MSNBC isn't a news network. They aren't about journalism, they appear to only want people who they feel are completely politically onboard with the narrative on the left. 

Nothing speaks to that concept and the lack of objectivity better than the tantrum Nicolle Wallace had on Friday over former President Donald Trump. She actually tosses away the script with what she's supposed to say in a fit of anger, saying, "We're not going to have this conversation again." She then goes on to rant against Trump, claiming he "broke the rule of law" (without saying how), but he's not being held "accountable." 

She was furious that lawfare against him had been delayed. She claimed that Trump had "managed to delay every federal criminal trial based on facts he barely denies." I think that Trump might dispute that characterization as well. 

Wallace claimed that Trump managed to enlist the Supreme Court in the delay process. She even tried to compare the situation to where a judge's family had been attacked when Trump made no threat against the judge or his daughter. That was pretty disgusting. 

But what was hilarious about that was how much her Trump Derangement Syndrome is affecting her. She can't even just say the words written for her by the network, which I'm sure were bad enough already. She has to go off on a personal rant of her own to let people know how disturbed she is with Trump. 

What Trump did criticize was potential conflicts of interest and we reported on some of those issues, including that the daughter is the president of a progressive political consulting firm that has clients who have made money off the case in their solicitation emails. There's now more of a push for recusal of the judge in the case.


READ MORE: 

Judge's Daughter Linked to Democrats Raising $93 Million Amid Trump Trial, Recusal Calls Intensify


How dare he not be railroaded and that he defend himself? He should just be declared guilty by fiat. How dare the lawfare not be done as fast as some Democrats would like to somehow incapacitate him before the election? She should be questioning the lawfare, but that would require journalism and not just TDS. 

As I said before, they're starting to lose it because they know Joe Biden is in trouble. She's not going to handle it very well when Trump wins. If the lawfare fails, and they have to rely on Biden to win, they know there's a big problem there, with Trump leading by five points in the most recent Fox poll, for example. He's leading with independents, and he's leading in most/all swing states, depending on what poll you check. 

But meanwhile, what do Americans think is Joe Biden's biggest achievement? 

Nothing. 


Related: 

New Poll Decimates Biden With Stunning Results, Including What Americans Think Is His Biggest Achievement

BRIDGE SALVAGE DREDGES UP CIA INTRIGUE

BRIDGE SALVAGE DREDGES UP CIA INTRIGUE

BY LLOYD BILLINGSLEY IN CIAINTELLIGENCEOBAMA ADMINISTRATION

Now on the scene of the fallen Francis Scott Key Bridge, the U.S. Naval Institute reports, is the Chesapeake, a crane barge with a 1,000-ton lift capacity. Originally called the SUN 800 the crane was built to assist in the construction of the Hughes Glomar Explorer, a deep-sea drill-ship platform, “built by the CIA to recover the 3,000-ton Soviet Golf II ballistic missile submarine K-129, which sunk in 1968.”As this account notes, “the real-life story of the Glomar Explorer eclipses any fiction Tinsel Town could concoct.”

Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger called the operation, “a marvel,” and the information recovered surely helped prevent the Soviet Union from unleashing nuclear missiles against the United States. Decades later, the mighty CIA was unable to prevent a small band of Islamic terrorists from crashing hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the worst attack on the United States since Pearl Harbor in 1941.

In 2020, a squad of 51 “Intelligence Community” officials claimed that Hunter Biden’s laptop was “Russian disinformation.” One of them was former CIA director John Brennan, who in 1976 voted for the Stalinist Gus Hall, candidate of the Communist Party USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Soviet Union. As Ronald Radosh (The Rosenberg File) notes, “it’s rather difficult to understand how Brennan was taken into the CIA, when a few years later Anthony Lake was discredited simply because he thought Hiss might be innocent.”

On the watch of composite character president Obama, whose beloved Frank Marshall Davis was a Communist, the Gus Hall voter became CIA director. John Brennan, who never should have got in the door, ran the CIA from 2013 to 2017. That eclipses most any fiction Tinsel Town could concoct, and how the story ends is anybody’s guess.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/03/bridge-salvage-dredges-up-cia-intrigue.php

Don's Tuesday Column

     THE WAY I SEE IT   by Don Polson  Red Bluff Daily News   4/02/2024

                ‘Twas once a fine park

Not having visited River Park in a long time, it was a surprise, a shock even, to read about law enforcement and other agencies cleaning up “encampments,” removing tons of trash left by “campers,” aka homeless squatters on public property. The location shown in the photo in Friday’s paper was not obvious but, in my 35+ years living and working in Red Bluff, I’ve not seen such filth and neglect in River park.

It was a refreshing spot to park and walk for many years when I needed stress relief close to the office where I held down a desk and fielded calls and clients. Locals enjoyed sitting at picnic tables or chasing thrown disks or balls. Apparently, the “blobs” of homeless scofflaws and lay-abouts spread like the namesake scary movie “The Blob.”

Just to review, we can thank, or curse, the 9th Appellate Court for telling all under its jurisdiction that, as a result of a big bucks Washington, DC law firm telling the authorities in Boise, ID, they had no right to force “campers” off public property—homeless people can’t always be told to move. 

Even worse, a more recent lawsuit has, I believe, found sympathetic, even addle-brained, judges to tell officials and their agencies that they are culpable if they fail to store and save the belongings of said homeless campers. Differing judicial opinions have these issues headed to the Supreme Court, if I’m correct, where we can only hope common sense and deference to self-rule prevails.

The issue of “squatters” illegally possessing a house, or overstaying their rental term, hit close to home for many, ourselves included, when the “beneficent” overlords of COVID autocracy proclaimed that evictions be postponed. Many readers may have been unaffected over the issue, but we had the misfortune of being unable to remove renters from a double-wide on acreage, who simply failed to pay rent for most of a year.

The only solution, as there was no legal way to evict under pandemic mandates, was to sell the property. Even then, after securing a judge’s finding in our favor, they didn’t vacate until informed that a sheriff’s deputy would be serving them with orders. Sha-zam, the place got empty in time for the new owners.

***

In “California proposal: how power bills are calculated,” readers were, if they read far enough into the AP article, treated to a slightly inaccurate statement of electricity rates. Not to mention the unintentional eye-glazing, number-crunching rate and charge amounts proposed by state regulators who, mind you, have no desire to see you pay less for lighting, heating and cooling your home.

The article stated that the “average price per kilowatt hour of electricity for California’s big three utilities…is about 36 cents, compared to the national average of 17 cents.” I checked and, sure enough, my PG&E bill is $0.42101 per kwh, not $0.36. That means that the two non-PG&E utilities are quite a bit below the 36-cent price per kwh. Also, you can say “You’re welcome” to neighbors with solar and EVs because part of what you pay subsidizes their chosen “green, low/no carbon” environmentally virtuous panels and cars.

***

It needs stating that the reason local readers, and most Americans, are not cheering and crediting the current administration for inflation ebbing a bit, is that it is objectively much higher than we’re told. In the 70s and 80s, when the “misery index,” or combined inflation and unemployment, helped make Jimmy Carter a one-term President, the cost, or interest, on credit cards, auto loans and mortgages was factored into the official inflation figure.

“Indeed, if we measured inflation as we did in the 1970s, the inflation that started in 2021 would have peaked at 18%—double its reported peak. That's higher than the worst of the 1970s and '80s. Inflation's current annual rate would be about 8%.” (National Bureau of Economic Research, economists Bolhuis, Cramer, Schulz and Summers) See: “Americans Can Tell the Difference Between Rosy Economic Data and Reality.”

Unemployment figures omit those no longer working or looking for work—amounting to millions of people that should rightfully be considered “unemployed”—which would add several percentage points to both national and California’s stated rates. We’re actually at around 7 to 8 percent unemployment nationally; 9 to 10 percent statewide and higher in Tehama County.

The “misery index” that Americans are really feeling, not the feel-good, pablum-fed EGBOK (Everything’s Going to Be OK) message put out from Democrats, is probably above 15 percent. That explains why Americans tell pollsters they are quite sour on the economy and give Biden no approval for it. Just thought you’d like to know.

For next week, see “The Hertz Meltdown Reveals the Scale of the EV Debacle” (Theepochtimes.com); “Say goodbye to choice in car buying” (Tom Knighton); “EV Market Imploding, So Biden Is About to Mandate Them (Fox News, Kristen Walker); and “Biden is still trying to take your gas-powered car” (David Strom).

It was 40 years ago, April 1, that this “fool for love” met his future bride in the Longhorn Saloon, Canoga Park, LA. Happy 40th anniversary, Barbara.


No Way Out: Tumultuous Months Lie Ahead

No Way Out: Tumultuous Months Lie Ahead

Jeff Davidson

Woody Allen, who's not one of my favorites, once said that humanity faces a crossroads. “One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, is to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.” I've written more than 200 articles for Townhall, and I wish I didn't feel compelled to write this one...

It now seems inevitable that leading up to this November, and in the months that follow, America will experience extreme turmoil, if not outright hostilities and even urban warfare. Nothing that I write here will have any impact in terms of what is likely to occur. For one, Leftists don't tend to read Townhall articles, and, two, the wheels of extremism are already in motion. 

A Potpourri of Tactics

I devote at least 500 hours annually to reading about political, historical, and cultural matters, adding up to more than 5,000 hours in the last 10 years. I’ve reached the same conclusion that legions of others have: Domestically the U.S. is headed for huge trouble. We already many of the Left’s tactics to hinder Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign, which includes devious hoaxes, endless lies and slander, bogus lawsuits and selective prosecution, unconstitutional fines, and much more.

As spring unfolds, Trump’s lead over Biden could grow. As such, expect the Left to act even more desperately with reprehensible tactics. Consider that of late RINO Congressional Representatives are suspiciously retiring early on dates with no chance for a special election to occur in their districts. Hence, Democrats can retake the House. Do you smell payola? Then, if Trump is elected, the House could attempt to deny certification. 

This summer, invariably, the Left will seek to foment another “George Floyd” incident and blame it all on Trump. With the power of The New York Times and major networks embellishing the narrative and offering World War II-level coverage, the masses will be snowed. Think about Donald Trump observing that if he's not elected there'll be a bloodbath in the auto industry, and how the mainstream media, in unison, immediately claimed that Trump was calling for nationwide violence. 

It is the Left That is Violent

The most violent segment of our society happens to be on the Left, as even many casual observers know. If Trump is ahead in the polls in September or October, expect dissension wherever the Left can prevail. When Trump wins the election in November, expect riots in 200 cities or more, surreptitiously funded by George Soros and his kind.

The money will fuel Antifa and other groups of young men and women who do not have career-level jobs and have questionable futures. The riots will persist for as long as the extremists can persist; days, weeks, even months. From there, open warfare, in the form of urban snipers, is entirely possible. 

Leading up to the inauguration on January 20, many key dates such as certification from Congress, approval of Electoral College votes, and so on, represent key opportunities for the Left’s planned disruptions. 

Sabotage on the Menu

January 20 could be a day of extreme violence. Washington, DC will have to be put under martial law. National guards from every surrounding state will be employed. The violent Left will not allow Trump to peacefully take over the reins from the corrupt, demented Joe Biden. 

Biden's administration, ruled by Barack Obama, will not offer a smooth transition of power, unlike all other presidents since our nation was founded. This is except for Obama, who did all he could to sabotage Trump's administration from the get-go.

The rest of January leading into February will represent days of turmoil. The Left will attempt to disrupt Trump's second administration 24/7. They will harass and threaten political appointees. They will form roadblocks. They will resort to antics in front of federal buildings, the Supreme Court building, and other targeted locations that they deem to be ‘in their way.’ 

Eventually, Trump can clean it all up but at enormous financial and social cost. Rioters and less-than-peaceful protestors can be taken off the streets and, this time, held for much more than 24 hours. They can be charged, fingerprinted, photographed, and processed by a now lawful Department of Justice. However, such major operations will result in a lot of pain and gnashing of teeth. 

Sadly for our nation, the scenarios above are more likely to be true than not.


Monday, April 1, 2024

Jonathan Turley Calls Out WH for Disgusting Response to Invitation From Comer for Biden to Testify

Jonathan Turley Calls Out WH for Disgusting Response to Invitation From Comer for Biden to Testify

Bonnie Cash/Pool via AP

As we reported, House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer invited Joe Biden to testify in the impeachment inquiry.  "Biden must answer questions about his participation in his family’s pay-for-influence schemes," Comer declared. 

Among the things the letter said was that Biden had denied involvement, but they had evidence to the contrary and that the White House was also refusing to turn over certain information or let witnesses testify, which Comer termed "obstruction" -- which could raise more impeachment potential issues. You can check out the full letter here.

White House Counsel spokesperson Iam Sams wrote an unprofessional and ridiculous response to Comer, when Comer first mentioned that he would be sending out an invitation. 

Then when the invitation officially went out, he really went over the edge with the juvenile response. 

This is supposed to be the spokesperson. This is how the White House behaves; these are the alleged "adults in charge" spreading teen memes, in response to an impeachment inquiry. Mostly because they don't dare have Joe Biden comply, so they have to do everything they can to deflect and gaslight like this. 

George Washington law professor Jonathan Turley had a few things to say about this bad response from the White House. 

"I can't remember an administration that had a White House Counsel's Office that engage so directly in taunting and attacking legal inquiries from Congress. I mean, this is an impeachment inquiry. It's the most important possible process that a President and Congress are engaged in. And yet you have a member of the legal Counsels Office, mocking and taunting that effort. The fact is that the President's public statements to the public stand completely contradicted. [Biden] lied, he lied when he said he had not spoken to business associates, he lied when he said he didn't have knowledge of these business dealings."

Turley notes the letter reduces everything down to 10 questions for Biden to answer, mostly had he spoken to Hunter's business associates. 

Given the Hur report, the White House knows that testifying would put Joe Biden in deep trouble. He might truly put his foot in it, and accidentally give up critical information that can sink them--or further expose his mental issues. They also have no explanation for Biden's lies and changing stories over the years. The White House is, again, basically spitting on all norms with this kind of response.

As Turley accurately notes, the media doesn't care about holding their feet to the fire on all of Joe Biden's lies and the potential issues in this case. But that isn't going to quiet the questions into Biden's actions. 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/03/29/turley-remarks-about-wh-response-on-biden-testimony-n2172088?utm_source=rsmorningbriefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=15803c7fc8c68b6fd1f0a5e7f4b59fc49df45d48335d4339ad60f7b0a0c7404d

We Have Been Granted a Preview of the Contradictory Election Coverage to Be Served in the Coming Year

We Have Been Granted a Preview of the Contradictory Election Coverage to Be Served in the Coming Year

AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough

We are already getting a sense of what the media complex will be delivering in the form of fractured reporting regarding the 2024 election. I do not mean it will be mostly (entirely) pro-Biden/anti-Trump, as that is a given. I am referring to the more specific aspect of how this coverage will be delivered. Mostly, it can be summed up in a term of brevity.

Oblivious contradiction.

Conveniently, one article came out this week that encapsulated much of this type of coverage. Now, granted, it does come from Rolling Stone, so it cannot be taken too seriously. However, contained therein are elements we have already seen leeching into the media coverage of the campaign, and its concise inclusion of many of the elements means it becomes valid as a touchstone example.

At The Stone, they appear to have a pair of dedicated writers on the campaign beat – Asawin Suebsaeng and Adam Rawnsley. This duo delivers for us a rendition of the Biden campaign strategy, something that entails a not-at-all ominous-sounding description of an election Superstructure.

What they describe is a complex framework that will be used to battle Trump on the campaign trail and to have tools in place to combat what they perceive to be attempts on Trump’s part to undermine the electoral process. A battalion of lawyers is at the ready to be dispatched as needed. Other efforts and plans are being drafted to combat what they see as attacks on the democratic process.

Over the past year, Team Biden has been conducting war games, crafting complex legal strategies, and devoting extensive resources to prepare for, as one former senior Biden administration official puts it, “all-hell-breaks-loose” scenarios. The preparations include planning for a contingency in which Biden’s margin of victory is so razor-thin that Trump and the GOP launch a tidal wave of legal challenges and political maneuvers to rerun his 2020 election strategy: declare victory anyways, and try to will it into existence.

“President Biden has been worried, for a while now, that Donald Trump is going to try to steal the election, if it’s very close on Election Day,” says a source familiar with Biden’s thinking. “If that ends up being the case, we are… also expecting the Republican Party to go into overdrive to help him steal it. We are continuing to build out the infrastructure to ensure that doesn’t happen.

And this begins the paradoxical approach to things. The first example comes from Rolling Stone itself. This same pair of reporters had a similar approach to the Trump campaign back in December, and they came away with a decidedly different summation. Trump was setting things up in a similar fashion – building a team of lawyers, challenging certain election standards, and (gasp) doing anything possible to win the election. Yet this was declared by the Stone-brothers as Trump plotting to steal the election.


This begins the trek down the path for the press, where, in a nod to Yogi Berra, when they come to a fork in the road, they will take it. Look at the very fact that they are invoking the word “steal” for the 2024 contest. For years, that has been the tripwire word because anyone who even hinted that the 2020 election was stolen was branded as an “election denier,” questioning the integrity of our democracy and operating within The Big Lie. 

Now, today, it is fashionable to suggest that the upcoming election could be stolen by Trump. It is sound reasoning and cagey campaigning, and not a conspiracy to state, “Trump has been working for years to pre-rig the 2024 election.” Huh.

This position also contains another contradiction. How is it that the Big Lie was always beaten back by the insistence that ours was the most secure election process to be found, that any claim to irregularities was unfounded claims, yet today it is projected that the next election could be entirely compromised? These are the same people, mind you, that, while touting the incorruptible characteristic of our elections, declared Trump only won the White House in 2016 due to Russians meddling with things. 

This hints at another conflict in messaging, for the record. While Putin has long been held up as Trump’s puppet master, they have to ignore the fact that the Russian leader has come out in favor of a Biden victory in November.

This all trends with the other inherent contradictions in the reporting. We get told that Trump represents a direct threat to our democracy, and as a result, it supposedly makes sense to have his name undemocratically pulled from ballots. Then, there is the need to prevent him from winning because he can become an authoritarian. The solution? Have the government indict him numerous times over and slap nearly one hundred charges against his name to poison the voting well. 

Our press appears unbothered that the banana republic practice of arresting political opponents is in play, as they accuse Trump of possibly enacting that practice. All of this is more than mere projection; this is desperate deflection at play. The media are going to continue this practice of demonizing what the Trump camp is doing, and heralding when the Biden campaign engages in the same practices by reclassifying what it is they are doing. 

https://redstate.com/bradslager/2024/03/30/we-have-been-granted-a-preview-of-the-contradictory-election-coverage-being-served-in-the-coming-year-n2172107?utm_source=rsafternoonbriefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=333548a2571394d78f5984884e55069e

The United States of America is doomed

 The United States of America is doomed


TOM KNIGHTON

That looks like a rather hyperbolic headline. It is not, I’m afraid. It is my most heartfelt belief that, as things currently are, our nation is doomed.

The greatest nation in the history of the world is currently destined for the dustbin of history.

Why?

Because there are people who are too vested in ruling to care about what this nation actually means.

From The Federalist:

Back in 2016, former eBay and Hewlett-Packard CEO (and, of course, failed California gubernatorial candidate) Meg Whitman gave a stirring interview to The New York Times about democracy. 

Democracies, Whitman said, have rarely lasted longer than a few hundred years, with the implication being that for America, which will celebrate its 250th anniversary in 2026, the clock is ticking. Whitman said anybody who thought American democracy would last forever was being naïve.

Of course, at the time, Whitman was talking about Donald Trump, the “demagogue” that elites from both major political parties said would drag America away from a constitutional republic and toward dictatorship — the bogeyman that even enlightened Republicans like Whitman refused to support. 

They were wrong: Despite his flaws, Trump was never a threat to democracy. He did not cancel elections like some claimed he would do. He did not crack down on civil liberties. When he did go too far, America’s institutions — especially the courts — checked those abuses. California filed more than 100 lawsuits against the Trump administration. That’s the way American government is supposed to work. 

,,,

But Whitman was right: American democracy is under attack. All Western democracies are under attack. And we shouldn’t assume they’ll survive. But Trump is not the threat. The elites themselves are the threat. They are the demagogues. And their hypocrisy and hierarchy are undermining the very institutions they purport to support. 

The Democrat Party’s blatantly political prosecutions of Trump and Trump associates — done while fretting about Trump using the DOJ to target his political opponents if he wins this year — are the most obvious and chilling examples. They crossed a Rubicon from which we may never recover. But other examples abound. 

One was on display last week at the U.S. Supreme Court, as multiple justices made excuses for the federal government’s effort to remove dissenting viewpoints from the digital town square. It was chilling to listen to the court’s three Democrats — women who, just a few generations ago, would not have been allowed to vote, much less sit on that bench — talk about how the law should be interpreted to protect the government when it tries to silence its critics. I wonder what dissidents like Susan B. Anthony and Martin Luther King Jr. would think of that. 

Here’s the thing, I don’t think either of those three justices would have said any such thing if Trump were in the White House right now.

Then, they’d want to prevent the government from having any power they could possibly justify blocking it from getting. They wouldn’t have dreamed of interpreting a law that would give more power to the Trump administration.

But they’re Democrats, first and foremost. They don’t care about the Constitution. They care about making sure their team wins, and so they’ll do whatever they can to make it win.

The only saving grace is that there are only three of them. They don’t have the juice to make that happen.

Yet all around, we see people doing their damnedest to destroy this nation.

For example, let’s talk about the border a bit. Tens of thousands of illegal immigrants are crossing the border. States like Texas got major brownie points for putting them on a bus and dropping them off in sanctuary cities, putting the burden on them.

In fairness, what else could they do? The federal government isn’t interested in securing those borders, though, and I fear that Texas has just made it easier for the progressive side.

Why?

Because as some have pointed out, the census doesn’t count citizens. It counts people. It doesn’t actually care if they’re here legally or not, which means illegal immigrants in places like New York and California may well make those states even more powerful in Congress. It may give them more pull in who is elected president.

Which is also likely why Biden isn’t doing a damned thing about the border.

See, what we’re seeing right now are progressives in the Democratic Party tripping over themselves to increase their own power at the expense of preserving the Constitution, as each has sworn to do.

That’s why they want to disarm us through gun control—if we have the means to resist, we might.

That’s why they want to demonize us as extremists, as terrorists, as racists—if they can marginalize us enough, many may start voting otherwise just to avoid the label.

That’s why they want to use public education as indoctrination centers—then they don’t have to worry about another generation opposing them because those kids won’t grow up knowing that opposition is an option.

Over and over again, their every move is dedicated to burning this nation down into a pile of ashes.

If there’s any good news it’s that it’s not quite too late to do something about it. Elections still have consequences. We have time to adjust course before the 2030 census. We still can fight to preserve our right to keep and bear arms. We can take action to keep DEI, CRT, and gender politics out of our classrooms. We still have time.

It just means we have to step up and make it happen before it’s too late. It means taking the gloves off and getting nasty if that’s what it takes to beat them so we can preserve our rights.

Yet we must also take care to actually preserve them, not run over them in slightly different ways. That temptation is likely there, easy to justify because of their abuses, and many are giving into exactly those temptations, but we must resist lest we become the evil we seek to diminish.

https://tomknighton.substack.com/p/the-united-states-of-america-is-doomed