Thursday, June 2, 2022

Election Integrity Group Unveils Findings on Ballot Trafficking in Arizona

True the Vote founder and president Catherine Engelbrecht makes a point during a presentation on ballot trafficking at the Arizona statehouse on May 31, 2022. Seated next to her is True the Vote data investigator Gregg Phillips. (Allan Stein/The Epoch Times)

Election Integrity Group Unveils Findings on Ballot Trafficking in Arizona

By Allan Stein
 
0:006:17

The election integrity group True the Vote presented Arizona lawmakers with cell phone tracking data showing alleged ballot traffickers visited drop boxes in two of the state’s largest counties no less than 5,700 times during the 2020 election.

“When we started the project, we didn’t know [what we would find],” said Catherine Engelbrecht, the Texas group’s founder and president.

“We began to think through what is a realistic expectation or threshold for when going to a dropbox is too many times. We wanted to focus on a clear, narrow data set [to demonstrate] “extreme outlier behavior.”

The group’s investigators settled on 10 visits as an actual number—but “here, in Arizona, they went an average of 21 times,” Engelbrecht told the panel of state legislators on May 31.

Lawmakers—all Republican—vowed to move forward with HB-2289 to make ballot drop boxes illegal in Arizona.

“The only thing I would like to see come out of this meeting is people going to jail,” said State Rep. Quang Nguyen (R). “I would just like to see people cuffed.”

The presentation was delayed 45 minutes while Arizona Democratic legislators wrangled over proposed gun control.

Epoch Times Photo
Arizona state Sen. Kelly Townsend (R) goes over data during a presentation on election integrity by True the Vote in Phoenix on May 31. (Allan Stein/The Epoch Times)

“This is political grandstanding, which I find is shameful,” said Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem (R).

“They’re trying to suspend the rules, which is always a bad idea—to bring forward a bill that hasn’t gone to committee, and that has not had any vetting whatsoever. It’s not going to happen.”

During the 90-minute presentation, Engelbrecht and True the Vote data investigator Gregg Phillips, former head of Mississippi’s Department of Human Services, described the group’s investigation into so-called “mules,” illegal ballot runners, and the role NGOs may have played to commit 2020 election fraud.

The investigation focused on two of the state’s largest counties—Maricopa County and Yuma County—and on unique visits to ballot boxes utilizing cell phone tracking technology to develop “patterns of life” for each alleged ballot trafficker.

“We resolved to try to find a path that we could measure that would be useful to law enforcement,” Engelbrecht said.

The study used Oct. 7 and Nov. 3, 2020 as a timeframe, identifying 202 target devices that made 4,242 unique dropbox visits in Maricopa County.

In Yuma County, the study found 1,435 unique dropbox visits by 41 target devices based on cell phone signals, or “pings.”

Epoch Times Photo
Arizona State Sen. Leo Biasiucci (R) listens as the election integrity group True the Vote presents its findings on ballot fraud in at the statehouse Arizona in Phoenix on May 31, 2022. (Allan Stein/The Epoch Times)

Engelbrecht said a geofence is around every dropbox to provide a “digital coordinate set” and measure how many times a device passed through the geofence. Measurements are precise to within a meter of contact with a ballot box.

The federal government uses the same tracking technology. Its accuracy is “nearly perfect [like] wearing an ankle bracelet,” Engelbrecht said.

“Friends, it’s happening on all of our phones, which are attached to us at almost all times. Suffice for this purpose and for this time to say the outlier set was so extreme that it warrants serious consideration, one that we hope this body before us will consider,” she said.

Phillips said the web of cell phone signals is “so significant. Your phone is sending regular pings [this] is how all that comes together.”

He added, “It can’t be overstated not to do what the [New York Times] did” in a series of articles on geofencing—”to say we got 50 billion pings and make all these [erroneous] assumptions.”

Phillips said the group’s study sifted through billions of signals, “teasing out” devices based to exclude “false positive” signals.

Dinesh D’Souza illustrated these findings in the new movie “2,000 Mules,” which seeks to expose organized ballot trafficking in the 2020 election.

“We decided to go in on a methodology that uses ad data [embedded] in all of your phones. This is how digital DNA is captured,” Engelbrecht said.

“If there were a subversion of [electoral] process, it would show up in the drop boxes. We believed that to prove it [geospatial data] would be something to focus on. We resolved to look at the ways to prove this.”

True the Vote is investigating alleged 2020 ballot harvesting in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania electoral jurisdictions as well, and will share its findings with law enforcement officials that could lead to criminal investigations.

Engelbrecht said inaccurate voter rolls provide a “gateway to all your problems” with mass mailing of ballots. She said that issues are more likely to occur at ballot drop boxes because they are not well regulated.

Epoch Times Photo
Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake (R) claps during a presentation of ballot trafficking by True the Vote at Arizona’s statehouse in Phoenix on May 31. Next to her is Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb. (Allan Stein/The Epoch Times)

True the Vote recommends Arizona lawmakers commit to clean voter rolls using real-time technology, and eliminate mass mailing of ballots and drop boxes. Or at the very least, drop boxes should be secure with video surveillance technology.

Finally, lawmakers should make the penalty for ballot running something “cheaters will fear,” said Engelbrecht, who views 2020 election fraud as a “vertical grift layers and layers deep.”

“The exploitation targets the most vulnerable communities. This is voter abuse. This is not about Republicans or Democrats. This is about securing the vote,” Engelbrecht said.

Arizona state Rep. Leo Biasiucci (R) said, “Obviously, something is going on. We’ve got to figure out what went wrong, how to fix it, and if you were involved, you should be prosecuted.”

State Sen. Nancy Barto (R) said it is “very scary” for voters not to have confidence in the ballot.

“We are going to get a handle on this,” she said.

State Sen. Walter “Walt” Blackman (R) summed up the solution for Arizona in “HB-2289.”

“After seeing this, we need to move forward with [HB-]2289,” he said to loud applause.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/election-integrity-group-unveils-findings-on-ballot-trafficking-in-arizona_4505771.html?utm_source=News&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-06-01-4&utm_medium=email&est=t2OjyLr5BabFJcxQjhdyzDN4uGSz9mpAw%2B6K%2Bv3xhoC%2B9kVjewCA9yZ%2FubW8

Uvalde – The Case For More Guns

Uvalde – The Case For More Guns

Uvalde – The Case For More Guns

Democrat politicians and their Liberal media megaphones have been screaming for control since the massacre in Uvalde last week. No one needs an AR-15, they screech. The resident in the Oval Office jokes that the AR-15 is not necessary because the “deer aren’t wearing Kevlar” and lies that the 2nd Amendment is not absolute, although James Madison would beg to differ. Based on what we saw, Uvalde actually makes the case for more armed residents.

Like most Americans, I have been both furious and nauseated about the slaughter of innocent school children in Uvalde since word began spreading. I have been a police and military supporter my entire life. I have always believed the police were the good guys. In Uvalde, the police were some of the cowards. Good guys aren’t cowards. Piers Morgan in the New York Post wrote, “Uvalde shooter wasn’t the only sniveling little coward — so were the cops“:

Yet incredibly, there were up to 19 armed police officers inside the school for 70 minutes before 18-year-old Salvador Ramos finished his hellish homicidal rampage.

That’s one for each of the 9 and 10-year-old children who were murdered.

These cops were all trained to use guns to protect the public and were all carrying guns to protect the public.

But when the moment came to protect the youngest, most vulnerable and defenceless members of the public, they went AWOL.

Or rather, they stood there outside the classroom where the kids were trapped, doing absolutely nothing.

This was despite several of the desperate children frantically calling 911 on cell phones pleading for help.

Eight calls in total were made from the classroom between 12.03pm and 12.50pm when the police finally went in.

We’re told they were waiting for keys to access the classroom, tactical equipment, and an order to go in.

But it sounds to me like what they were really waiting for was a collective infusion of bravery and duty like the kind Rob O’Neill and his fellow SEALs displayed in Abbottobad, Pakistan, 11 years ago.

And it never came.

Instead, these shameful excuses for ‘law enforcement’ did nothing as 19 children and two teachers were blown to pieces at close range by a maniac with an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle.

The cowardly cops made a cordon to keep parents back. Initially. I thought that was necessary. Can’t have Moms running into the school willy-nilly endangering others and hampering the cops who are in there to make holes in the shooter. But I was waaaay wrong. The videos of parents pleading with law enforcement to go into the school. I identify with the emotion of each of the parents in this video:

You can feel their anger, desperation, fear and frustration.

The Uvalde cops are cowards. That’s clear. The residents claim it’s a small town where everyone knows everyone. Really, it has been almost a week and we are just now finding out that Creepy Massacre Kid was a bully (not bullied), who tortured animals and threatened to rape girls. Really? No one thought to snitch on Creepy Massacre Kid?

The Twitterverse had their collective knickers in a knot because the NRA was still going to hold its convention. I’m not a big fan of the NRA because they are more interested in selling life insurance than educating the public on safe weapons handling. Watching the protesters on Twitter scream about guns made me even more furious.z

Why do people think behavior like that is going to convince anyone about anything?

The “blood on your hands” mob are even more wrong than usual. What we need in this country are more armed and trained citizens. When Antifa burns down a city, what do the police do? Nada. When a gunman is murdering children, what do the cops do? Nothing. Imagine a few of those angry desperate moms in the video armed. Armed with a gun, a long rifle, a window breaker. The Creepy Massacre Kid would have assumed room temperature in a few seconds.

What the heck is this waiting for a master key? Take care of yourself, my people. Don’t rely on anyone else. Cops or government. Buy a gun and take a safety class.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden says he is going to “Do something”. It won’t help you, whatever he does.

https://victorygirlsblog.com/uvalde-the-case-for-more-guns/

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

HAS THE TRANSGENDER TREND PEAKED?

HAS THE TRANSGENDER TREND PEAKED?

BY STEVEN HAYWARD IN GENDERGENDER FOLLIESIDENTITY POLITICS

Surveys over the last several years have found an increasing number of young people  “identify” themselves as transgender or “non-binary,” with some surveys finding the number as high as 30 percent. (Most report it around 20 percent.) Some of this may be peer pressure and wanting to be part of the latest trend, the way every Oxford or Cambridge student used to become a Communist for a week or two.

And of course you are not allowed to comment critically on the scene, as we see by the ferocious blowback at the comedians (Dave Chappelle, Bill Maher, and Ricky Gervais) who dare to point out the transgender emperor isn’t wearing any clothes. (For my part, I like to tell students Lincoln’s debate query that is designed to illustrate essential human nature: “If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have? The answer is four; calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it so.” Pretty sure some students can figure it out.)

But maybe the transgender phenomenon has peaked?

The first bit of evidence is a long and surprisingly balanced New York Times feature article this weekend about the controversy over transgender athletes in women’s competition. Understand that for the identity politics crusade, there can be no controversy about transwomen competing in women’s leagues. For the Times to acknowledge that there is a genuine “debate” about the matter is not just bigotry; it’s the equivalent of climate denialism.

Still, the Times story notes that not everyone is buying into the identity mania:

The women on the Princeton University swim team spoke of collective frustration edging into anger. They had watched Lia Thomas, a transgender woman who swam for the University of Pennsylvania, win meet after meet, beating Olympians and breaking records.

On Jan. 9, the team met with Robin Harris, executive director of the Ivy League athletic conference. The swimmers, several of whom described the private meeting on condition of anonymity, detailed the biological advantages possessed by transgender female athletes. To ignore these, they said, “was to undermine a half-century fight for female equality in sport.”

Ms. Harris had already declared her support for transgender athletes and denounced transphobia. In an interview, she said that she had replied that she would not change rules in midseason.

One can guess what many of these actual women privately think about what is going on. This passage is especially brutal for the transgender crowd:

Even nomenclature is contentious. Descriptive phrases such as “biological woman” and “biological man” might be seen as central to discussing differences in performance. Many trans rights activists say such expressions are transphobic and insist biology and gender identity are largely social constructs.

Some trans activists try to silence critics, whom they derisively call TERFs, which stands for trans-exclusionary radical feminists. A spokeswoman for a gay rights group urged a reporter not to “platform” — that is not to quote — those she said held objectionable views, including Martina Navratilova, the retired tennis legend, a champion of liberal and lesbian causes. Ms. Navratilova argues that transgender female athletes possess insurmountable biological advantages.

“So I’m a ‘TERF’ — OK, that’s the way you want to go?” Ms. Navratilova said in response. “I played against taller women, I played against stronger women, and I beat them all. But if I faced the male equivalent of Lia in tennis, that’s biology. I would have had no shot. And I would have been livid.”

Even science is starting to be more direct about what’s wrong with the scene:

When a male athlete transitions to female, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, which governs college sports, requires a year of hormone-suppressing therapy to bring down testosterone levels. The N.C.A.A. put this in place to diminish the inherent biological advantage held by those born male.

Ms. Thomas followed this regimen. But peer reviewed studies show that even after testosterone suppression, top trans women retain a substantial edge when racing against top biological women. . .

The sprinter Allyson Felix won the most world championship medals in history. Her lifetime best in the 400 meters was 49.26 seconds; in 2018, 275 high school boys ran faster.

Generally you’ve had to read conservative media to hear these kinds of facts discussed. I’m guessing that the identity politics crowd is livid at the Times right now.

Meanwhile, also over the weekend Eric Kaufman of the University of London and the Center for the Study of Political Ideology released a new study, “Born This Way? The Rise of LGBT as a Social and Political Identity” that notes the survey data suggesting the trend may have peaked and might even be receding. There are some collateral findings in his review of the survey data that are also notable. Let’s look at a few.

First, here’s the Gallup data on self-identification trends over time:

Working from GSS data and other data sets, Kaufman has produced a series of his own charts that delve deeper into the matter.

Guess which ideology tends to see the most people identifying as transgender?

From the study:

  • College students majoring in the social sciences and humanities are about 10 points more LGBT than those in STEM. Meanwhile, 52% of students taking highly political majors such as race or gender studies identify as LGBT, compared to 25% among students overall.

Big surprise there.

Here are some of the other findings that are sure to drive the identitarians into a rage:

  • Very liberal ideology and LGBT identification are associated with anxiety and depression in young people. Very liberal young Americans are twice as likely as others to experience these problems. 27% of young Americans with anxiety or depression were LGBT in 2021. This relationship appears to have strengthened since 2010.
  • Among young people, mental health problems, liberal ideology, and LGBT identity are strongly correlated. Using factor analysis in two different studies shows that assuming one common variable between all three traits explains 40-50% of the variation.

But maybe 2020 was the peak year for this trend? Kaufman again:

  • Various data sources indicate that gender nonconformity – trans and non-binary identity – reached its peak in the last few years and has started to decline.

There’s also evidence that many women claiming transgender or bisexual identity are simply lying about it, which makes intuitive sense if this is partly a campus fad.

Much more in the full study, if you have the leisure time to take it in.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/05/has-the-transgender-trend-peaked.php

LOOSE ENDS (170)

LOOSE ENDS (170)

 I think we can inaugurate a new catchphrase today for corruption and stupidity: “All the rectitude of a DC jury.”

Or: “The OJ jury: ‘We are impressed!‘”

Or, move over “faster-than-a-speeding-bullet” Superman: “Faster than a DC jury acquitting a Clinton crony.”

 News item: Gee—who could have seen this coming?

San Francisco’s Lowell High School is seeing a record number of failing grades in its fall 2021 class – the first admitted through a new lottery system over its merit-based admissions process.

Of the 620 students in Lowell’s freshman class, 24.4% received at least D or F in their first semester, according to internal records obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle. This is almost triple the number of the first-year students in the two years before – 7.9% in fall 2020 and 7.7% in fall 2019.

And who could have seen the proposed remedy for this? (Actually anyone paying attention to “progressive” racists):

Oak Park and River Forest High School administrators will require teachers next school year to adjust their classroom grading scales to account for the skin color or ethnicity of its students. . .

In an effort to equalize test scores among racial groups, OPRF will order its teachers to exclude from their grading assessments variables it says disproportionally hurt the grades of black students. They can no longer be docked for missing class, misbehaving in school or failing to turn in their assignments, according to the plan.

“Traditional grading practices perpetuate inequities and intensify the opportunity gap,” reads a slide in the PowerPoint deck outlining its rationale and goals.

This is sure to end well for the very people the left say they want to help. (Of course, much of leftism is merely a screen for guilty white liberals to feel better about themselves. . .)

 Maybe The Atlantic is hoping to reduce the increasing number of people who throw the magazine in the recycling bin without reading it?

[A]lthough some materials can be effectively recycled and safely made from recycled content, plastics cannot. Plastic recycling does not work and will never work. The United States in 2021 had a dismal recycling rate of about 5 percent for post-consumer plastic waste, down from a high of 9.5 percent in 2014, when the U.S. exported millions of tons of plastic waste to China and counted it as recycled—even though much of it wasn’t. . .

Yet another problem is that plastic recycling is simply not economical.Recycled plastic costs more than new plastic because collecting, sorting, transporting, and reprocessing plastic waste is exorbitantly expensive. The petrochemical industry is rapidly expanding, which will further lower the cost of new plastic.

I remember when NY Times columnist John Tierney published a detailed article exposing the folly of recycling in the New York Times Magazine in the mid-1990s. It generated more hate mail than anything he’d ever written, because recycling is the key sacrament of the environmental religion.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/05/loose-ends-170.php

The Left Dominates the Legal System, and They’re Taking Down GOP Election Attorneys en Masse

The Left Dominates the Legal System, and They’re Taking Down GOP Election Attorneys en Masse

Rachel Alexander

The day after the 2020 presidential election, I predicted the left was going to target any attorney who dared to get involved challenging election fraud. They’d already started successfully targeting conservative attorneys, it just hadn’t gotten much attention yet. Since most people are  bored by legal issues, they fly under the radar. I wrote about it over a year ago, and things have gotten far worse since then. This year, they launched “The 65 Project” to brazenly accomplish it, named after the 65 lawsuits Trump-affiliated attorneys filed after the election. 

The left has developed a powerfully coordinated legal election effort under the leadership of left-wing lawyer Marc Elias. In recent years, he has successfully brought together a coalition of left-wing nonprofit groups to work in conjunction with each other on elections. It’s a brilliant plan considering the left now dominates much of the legal system to give him victories; in urban areas they have more judgeships, they dominate state bars which are responsible for attorney discipline, and they run the biggest, most powerful law firms. 

The reason they have taken over state bars is because while conservative attorneys are more likely to have families and be involved in church, taking up much of their free time, liberal lawyers are not, so they have more time to volunteer and serve on state bars’ boards of governors and committees. The left also controls large law firms for similar reasons. Without family and church obligations, they can devote long hours to achieving required billable hours. 

Now they’re coming after elected attorneys too. Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who has been out on the forefront investigating election fraud, had 12 bar complaints filed against him and his staff by radical activist Democratic Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs over election issues. He beat them, but she will just figure out reasons to file more; continue to throw mud until something sticks. The Arizona State Bar is one of the most vicious bars in the country. I work as a reporter, and can rarely get comments for my articles from conservative attorneys in the state due to their fear of retaliation.

The State Bar of Texas is going after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, suing him for investigating election fraud in the 2020 election. Paxton asked the U.S. Supreme Court to enjoin Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for breaking election laws by implementing voting changes during the COVID-19 pandemic without the approval of state legislators. SCOTUS rejected his request 7-2 for lack of standing, a sign that it wasn’t completely without merit. So now the bar is alleging he violated a catch-all, vague rule of professional misconduct prohibiting “dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.” 

But if he really had committed fraud, shouldn’t he be given a jury trial by fellow Americans? It’s easy to get left-wing run state bars to disbar conservative attorneys, because it’s not a jury of Americans that decides; it’s either a left-leaning bar judge or panel stacked with left-wing attorneys, plus occasionally a token member or two from the public.

Jonathan Mosely, who represented Jan. 6 protesters, was disbarred by the Virginia State Bar. He represented Oath Keeper Kelly Meggs and Proud Boys leader Zachary Rehl, worked for Judicial Watch, and served in the Reagan administration, so he was a juicy target. The reasoning was more of the usual, vague, catch-all words; failing in “meritorious claims and contentions, candor toward the tribunal, fairness to opposing party and counsel and misconduct.” Politico bragged, “Moseley’s exit could complicate Meggs’ ability to prepare a defense.”

The charges against the Jan. 6 protesters have been mostly filed in courts assigned to Democratic appointed judges. When they haven’t, the defendants have done surprisingly well. D.C. District Court Judge Trevor McFadden, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, acquitted defendant Matthew Martin of all four misdemeanor charges filed against him. Martin, who was caught on video entering the U.S. Capitol building as police officers waved him on, had been charged with entering and remaining in a restricted building, disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building, violent entry and disorderly conduct in a Capitol building, and parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building.

The 65 Project includes David Brock, who has made a career out of targeting conservatives. This year, the group filed bar complaints against Sen. Ted Cruz, Trump attorney Jenna Ellis and Trump attorney Joe DiGenova. They’ve filed several other complaints against lesser known attorneys as well. 

The California State Bar was already investigating Trump attorney John Eastman, who was one of the most reputable conservative attorneys in the country, destroying his career.  He was forced out of his position as a professor at Chapman University’s law school, and suffered other retaliation. Trump attorney Sidney Powell similarly had a prestigious reputation in her area of criminal law, but is now buried in civil lawsuits and the State Bar of Texas is recommending sanctions against her.

Over half the states have mandatory state bars, so once disbarred, an attorney can no longer practice law. And even if they move to another state, other states almost always reciprocally recognize the disbarment. 

Sadly, the right is not united in protecting its attorneys. Once in the left’s crosshairs, they are deserted, there is no one writing to expose their side of the witch hunts, no one fundraising to help them. The right raised more than half a million dollars to help Kyle Rittenhouse — which they should have — but ignores conservative lawyers under fire, even fellow conservative lawyers who should know better. 

Part of this is because the left cleverly targets underlings who have no fame, connections or money. Tellingly, the Texas State Bar went after Paxton’s First Assistant Brent Webster first. Once they take him down, it becomes much easier to get Paxton, since Paxton looks “complicit.” This problem is just going to get worse until the right stops ignoring and deserting these attorneys. You can scream election fraud all you want, but if it gets bottlenecked in the legal system, the left wins.

https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2022/05/30/the-left-dominates-the-legal-system-and-theyre-taking-down-gop-election-attorneys-en-masse-n2607956

BIDEN’S TRAIN-WRECK ECONOMY

BIDEN’S TRAIN-WRECK ECONOMY

BY SCOTT JOHNSON IN BIDEN ADMINISTRATIONECONOMYENERGY POLICY

In its lineup this morning RealClearPolitics has done us the favor of retrieving Daniel Henninger’s weekly Wall Street Journal column of this past Thursday on “Joe Biden’s train-wreck economy” (behind the Journal’s paywall). We noted Biden’s reference in Tokyo to the “incredible transition” he is engineering to renewable energy and a green economy. A beautiful future awaits, if we can draw on our savings to pay $5.00 a gallon and more at the pump.

I took the talk of “transition” to be more mush from the wimp. Henninger makes a persuasive case that “Biden” is to be taken seriously:

“When it comes to the gas prices,” he said in Tokyo, “we’re going through an incredible transition that is taking place that, God willing, when it’s over, we’ll be stronger and the world will be stronger and less reliant on fossil fuels.”

The head of Mr. Biden’s White House economic council, Brian Deese, previewed this argument a few days earlier: “Our economy is in a transition from what has been the strongest recovery in modern American history to what can be a period of more stable and resilient growth that works better for families.”

Messrs. Biden and Deese are getting mocked in some quarters for euphemizing the current mess as a “transition.” But these remarks aren’t just Psakiesque word salads. Those “transition” statements help define how Mr. Biden and the Democratic Party want American workers to live into the far future. Buying into this “transition” will be the party’s pitch to voters in the fall elections.

* * * * *

The only thing we know today is that the pre-existing status quo is gone. When Joe Biden and Brian Deese say they want to transition to an economy with more “stable and resilient” growth, they are describing their alternative to the prepandemic froth. That vision has two goals.

The first is to use taxes and government-guided capital investments to compensate for the widening spread between the incomes of knowledge-economy workers and everyone else. The other goal, of course, is their great white whale—a non-fossil-fuel economy. Growth, they assume, will be slower in their economy but somehow steadier and more predictable. Substance aside, the progressive economic model is on its way down the political drain. Mr. Biden admitted as much in Tokyo when he remarked that passing his Build Back Better agenda would have lowered child and family-care costs and tempered the effects of inflation. Of course, it’s not happening.

Still, this grand progressive experiment—a final choice between the U.S. as a welfare state or a growth state—came within one Senate vote of reality. Sen. Joe Manchin blocked creation of the transfer-payment state, and the Democrats’ massive Covid outlays produced insurmountable political problems with inflation and labor-market distortions. The green-energy dream—whose relentlessly ignored costs will always be at cross purposes with their transfer payments high costs—is on hold for this election cycle and probably the presidential election in 2024.

The whole thing is worth reading if you can get behind the paywall, but that is the heart of Henninger’s argument.

JOHN adds: This link should take you to the article.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/05/bidens-train-wreck-economy.php