Monday, March 23, 2026

Where were you when…? (DP: Submitted to Daily News editor but unpublished)

 To the Editor:

Where were you when…?

In 1979, a lot of things happened, but a singular event reverberates to this day: The day Iranian mobs took over an American embassy, seizing 52 hostages, in Tehran, Iran. What was I doing those 47 years ago?

Current events got me thinking; perhaps it sparked a memory for you, dear reader. I was in my 28th year of life. I had relocated from Hobart, Indiana, where I graduated from high school in 1969, and spent a couple of nonproductive years at Valparaiso University. A step-van became my RV while I searched for...well, something spiritual, you might say. A Self Realization Fellowship commune in the Nevada City area was the first landing spot; from there, I was encouraged to keep traveling. Some church conferences led me to working on both church staff, as well as outside low-level jobs. Dormitory living and early-rising for prayers found me in Santa Barbara, Los Angeles, and Del Mar. Times were fun, fulfilling and self-revelatory; not, however, the stuff of a glowing resume.

I’m pretty sure 1979 found me in a church facility in Malibu Canyon, on Mulholland Drive. There were many prayer sessions for the hostages; Iran’s history, geo-political and religious background was quite foreign to me. Being a “Boomer” born in 1950, post-high school hadn’t informed my perspective. Any “Gen X-ers” reading this would have either been in high school, enjoying childhood, or not yet born. Born after 1985? Consult history books that, hopefully, are fair and honest without casting America in a negative light.

I may have voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976; don’t hold it against me as my 25-year-old self just thought he was a nice man and I had read that Ronald Reagan was scary. Four years later I flipped to the right and never went back; the private sector, which then employed me in restaurant management, can do that when economic reality sets in.

When the disaster in the desert occurred, where the attempt to rescue the hostages became a conflagration of destroyed aircraft and dead soldiers, Marines and airmen, it was dawning on me that America’s leadership and Carter’s presidency was, at the very least incompetent, if not wrong-headed.

The 1983 Marine barracks bombing by Iran killed 241; the 1984 bombing of U.S. embassies, also by Iran, killed scores; the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing by Iran killed 19 U.S. Airmen. Between 2003 and 2011, Iran-backed militias, roadside bombs and other attacks killed over 600 American soldiers and Marines; an Iran-connected 2007 raid in Karbala abducted and killed 4 Americans; a 2020 missile strike on a U.S. base continued the savage, unprovoked slaughter of Americans by Iran.

Nearly 50 years after that naive 28-year old prayed for American hostages in Tehran, this wizened patriot can only cheer on our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines as they exact justifiable revenge on a vile, bloodthirsty, barbarian, 7th-century “Death to America”-chanting cult/nation, in a war they started—that America is now finishing.

Today in Minnesota Fraud

Today in Minnesota Fraud

by Bill Glahn in Feeding Our Future, Fraud, Ilhan Omar, Keith Ellison, Minnesota, Tim Walz


Yes, it’s back in the headlines. From Fox News,

Minnesota Fraud Exposed
New audit exposes flawed system critics say let Minnesota fraud slip through cracks: ‘Didn’t act for years’

Long story short: the state’s Dept. of Human Services refused to investigate reports of kickbacks to “client” families paid by vendors in the state’s billion-dollar autism therapy program because…reasons.

The Feeding Our Future child nutrition fraud will see six (6) more guilty pleas filed this week. The defendants are all part of the same extended family (surname Mohamed) who stole some $12 million from taxpayers from a program meant to feed hungry, low-income children. This will bring the total number of guilty pleas and courtroom convictions in the case up to 63. More sentences are scheduled for this month in the case. Eventually, the defendants will be collectively sentenced to hundreds of years in federal prison (you serve the full sentence at the federal level) and ordered to repay hundreds of millions of dollars in stolen funds.

Whenever I report on such developments, there are always replies to the effect of “why bother?” because “nothing ever happens.”

The “nothing” that they refer to is the resignation, indictment, imprisonment, and bankruptcy of Gov. Tim Walz, state Attorney General Keith Ellison, and U.S. Congresswoman Ilhan Omar.

All three share significant culpability for the multi-billion-dollar frauds committed, primarily by persons from the state’s Somali-ethnic community. All three were aware of the fraud, while the fraud was occurring. All three failed to stop the fraud when each had the power to do so. All three benefitted from campaign donations and election votes provided by the fraudsters.

That’s nonfeasance. Did/do they have a “duty of care”? Have they broken any prosecutable law? Is gross negligence a crime? Under what statute (state or federal) or legal theory could they be subject to criminal prosecution?

I am not a lawyer, but I wonder if a prosecutor could develop a case under the concept of “honest services.” Would the campaign donations and votes constitute a “bribe”? Would the refusal to take action constitute an official act?

In the case of Tim Walz, the approval of fraudulent vendor applications and the resumption of payments to fraudulent vendors would represent official acts taken by his administration.

How do you directly link the “quid” to the “pro quo”?

I think all would agree that the matter is at a minimum a political question. Two of the three are running for re-election this year (Walz dropped his re-election bid.)

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2026/03/today-in-minnesota-fraud-12.php

The Second Coming of DOGE

The Second Coming of DOGE

The Second Coming of DOGE
AP Photo/Paul Sancya

President Trump has signed an executive order creating a task force to crack down on fraud in government programs. It will be headed by Vice President JD Vance.

This is the administration's second effort to reduce government misspending and overspending following Elon Musk's effort as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.

As we approach another April 15 with a $38 trillion debt (and counting), addressing fraud is something that ought to be a bipartisan goal. The fact that it hasn't been a priority for politicians is largely because, I suspect, it isn't their money that is being wasted. It might also be said that those on the receiving end of ill-gotten gains are not about to relinquish their largesse.

How bad is the problem? According to the disingenuously named Government Accountability Office (GAO), the federal government "loses between $233 billion and $521 billion annually to fraud in improper payments." The GAO can't give an accurate figure and says it could be higher because not all losses are reported. If there were more accountability, perhaps fraud would not be that big a problem.

The GAO says 16 agencies reported a total loss of $162 billion in improper payments across 68 programs just in fiscal year 2024. It distinguishes between fraud and improper payments, but lost money is lost money no matter the process. It should come as no surprise, given past reports, that Medicare and Medicaid account for more than half (53 percent) of the fraudulent losses. Congress - especially Republicans - has failed to do anything to reform these entitlement programs for fear of being demagogued by the opposite party.

Each of these government agencies has an inspector general, whose job it is to identify fraud and improper payments. Sometimes they do, but given the huge amount of lost money, it seems clear the crooks are running things like an old-fashioned Chicago crime syndicate.

President Trump says that eliminating fraud will balance the budget. While it might help reduce the debt, it wouldn't be enough to cancel it, not even close. Congress would need to step in to achieve a balanced budget like the deal worked out between President Clinton and Speaker Newt Gingrich way back in the 1990s. Fiscal responsibility seems to have gone the way of personal responsibility in our entitlement and no-fault culture.

A White House fact sheet describing the president's executive order says that in addition to the reported $19 billion in fraud in Minnesota, "there is strong reason to believe similar vulnerabilities exist in California, Illinois, New York, Maine and Colorado, where insufficient safeguards and weak oversight increase the risk of large-scale fraud." Trump and Vance promise not only that Democrat states will be investigated, but also Republican states, if there is evidence of fraud.

It's a worthy goal and one taxpayers should favor, but eliminating fraud is something like eliminating sin, or Dracula's lust for blood. Once the initial announcement has been eclipsed by other events, let's hope the effort doesn't fade with it.

There used to be something called the Puritan ethic in America, where people - and government - were supposed to live within their means, avoid debt and especially be honest in their financial affairs. You have to go back a century to read about those values being generally accepted, if not always practiced.

As half the country that pays taxes prepares to send more of the money we earn to Washington, which already takes in record amounts, one wishes the vice president more than luck in achieving his and the president's goals. It will take something we are unfamiliar with to achieve them.

https://townhall.com/columnists/calthomas/2026/03/19/the-second-coming-of-doge-n2673068?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-fu7aFyZsRV&utm_term=&_nlid=fu7aFyZsRV&_nhids=nc9d0u18Irm1ls

God’s Design: The Left’s Nightmare

God’s Design: The Left’s Nightmare

God’s Design: The Left’s Nightmare
Image via Pixabay

There is a thread that runs through nearly every major debate consuming our culture today. It shows up in conversations about gender, energy, economics, justice, foreign policy—even the very meaning of life itself.

And once you see it, you cant unsee it.

At the center of all of it is a single, unavoidable truth: Gods design works.

And the modern Left cant stand it.

Thats not hyperbole. Its not partisan chest-thumping. Its the unavoidable conclusion drawn from watching how these debates actually play out in the real world. Because over and over again, when humanity aligns itself with the way God designed things to function, life flourishes. And when we rebel against that design, things fracture, decay, and ultimately collapse.

Start with the most personal and volatile debate of the moment: the human body itself.

For thousands of years, every civilization understood something simple and profound: male and female are not arbitrary categories. They are foundational realities embedded into the very fabric of human existence. Modern biology hasnt undone that truth—it has confirmed it at the cellular level. Every cell in the human body carries the imprint of sex. XX or XY. It is written into our DNA.

And yet, in defiance of both ancient wisdom and modern science, we are told that identity can be declared apart from biology—that surgical alteration and hormonal intervention can override what is literally encoded into every cell.

But reality doesnt bend.

Study after study has raised serious concerns about long-term physical and psychological outcomes tied to aggressive medical interventions, particularly among minors. The human body was not designed to be dismantled and reassembled according to ideology. It was designed with intention. With purpose.

Affirming that design leads to health, coherence, and stability. Rejecting it leads to confusion, fragmentation, and harm.

The same pattern emerges when you step into the energy debate.

For centuries, human flourishing has depended on reliable, scalable energy. Entire civilizations have risen on the back of it. And yet today, we are told to abandon the very systems that power modern life—not because viable alternatives are ready to fully replace them, but because ideology demands it. 

The result?

Energy shortages. Rising costs. Strained infrastructure. Nations forced to make desperate compromises just to keep the lights on.

Gods design for the earth included abundance—resources to be stewarded wisely, not rejected blindly. When we pursue innovation within that framework, we thrive. When we attempt to override it with utopian fantasies detached from reality, people suffer.

Look at economics.

There are moral underpinnings to how economies function best—principles that echo biblical truths: honesty, stewardship, personal responsibility, reward for work, protection of property. These arent just nice ideas. They are the foundation of every prosperous society in history.

Undermine them—through corruption, redistribution schemes detached from productivity, or the erosion of accountability—and what happens?

Inflation rises. Opportunity shrinks. Trust collapses.

Because economic systems are not immune from moral reality. They depend on it.

Justice tells the same story.

At the heart of true justice is the concept of the imago Dei—the belief that every human being is made in the image of God and therefore possesses inherent dignity and worth. That idea has shaped Western legal systems for centuries. It is why we value life. Why we pursue fairness. Why we punish wrongdoing.

But strip that foundation away, and justice becomes something else entirely.

It becomes selective. Political. Weaponized.

Weve seen it play out—where theft of public resources is excused, where law enforcement is undermined, where victims are forgotten, and criminals are rationalized. When justice is no longer anchored in the inherent value of every human life, it stops being justice at all.

It becomes power.

And then theres peace.

Peace is not achieved by appeasement. It is not sustained by weakness. History has proven that time and time again. Real peace comes through strength, clarity, and moral conviction—the willingness to confront evil and restrain it.

Scripture understood this long before modern geopolitics ever existed.

Blessed are the peacemakers” does not mean blessed are the passive. It means blessed are those willing to do the hard, often costly work of establishing and maintaining order.

We are watching that principle play out on the world stage even now.

And finally, there is life itself.

Populations dont survive by accident. They survive when families are formed, when children are welcomed, when communities are built around love, sacrifice, and continuity. Every civilization that has thrived has honored those truths in some form.

But reject them—devalue family, diminish the importance of children, redefine the very structure of human relationships—and the consequences are immediate.

Birth rates collapse. Loneliness rises. Societies age and weaken. Life withers. Because life flourishes when it aligns with design.

All of this points to a reality that many would rather avoid: this isnt ultimately about politics.

Its about authority.

Gods design stands as a constant, unchanging reference point. It doesnt shift with cultural trends. It doesnt bend to ideological pressure. It simply is. And that presents a problem for any worldview that insists on self-definition above all else.

Because if Gods design is true, then we are not the ultimate authors of reality. And that is the tension at the heart of it all.

The anger. The insistence. The relentless push to redefine what has always been.

Its not just disagreement with other people. Its resistance to the One who designed it all.

But heres the part that should give every one of us pause—and hope.

Gods design is not arbitrary. It is not restrictive for the sake of restriction. It is ordered toward life, toward flourishing, toward love.

When we live within it, we dont lose freedom—we find it.

When we honor it, we dont diminish humanity—we elevate it.

And when we reject it, the consequences arent just philosophical.

They are painfully, unmistakably real. 

Because in the end, reality always wins.

And reality, whether we acknowledge it or not, still belongs to God.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2026/03/18/gods-design-the-lefts-nightmare-n2673045?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&utm_content=ncl-RzaA8MaTxx&utm_term=&_nlid=RzaA8MaTxx&_nhids=nc9d0u18Irm1ls

Sunday, March 22, 2026

Netanyahu: 48 Hours Proved Iran Is the ‘Enemy of Civilization’

Netanyahu: 48 Hours Proved Iran Is the ‘Enemy of Civilization’

AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu impressed upon foreign nations griping about the joint U.S.-Israel Iran operation that the Islamic regime of Iran is an enemy to civilization — and even to human life itself.

It is rare to find a conflict in history where one side is thoroughly evil and even demonic, while the other side is fighting for truly noble goals. But the fight between America and Israel (and the Persian people) on one side and the terrorist Iran regime on the other is just such a conflict. The Iranian regime is literally illustrating that more every single day.

Just after an Iranian strike caused a mass casualty event in Arad, at least 25 people including a 10-year-old boy also suffered injuries from Iranian missile fire striking the city of Dimona, Israel. From the scene of the strike, Netanyahu said, “If anyone needed explanation of why Iran is the enemy of civilization, and the enemy and the danger to the entire world you got it in the last 48 hours.”

He explained further, “In the last 48 hours, they fired … on civilians, on children. There's a children's nursery here. There's an old …person's home here. Civilians, families, they fire terror weapons on civilians. And often they use cluster bombs, which are forbidden by international law.”

RelatedIsrael Fights on As Iranian Regime Hits Civilians, Kindergarten

Besides that, Netanyahu emphasized, “The second thing that [Iran’s regime] did is that they fired on Jerusalem right next to the holy places. They sent ballistic missiles that could have destroyed the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Al Aqsa Mosque, and the Western Wall, the three holiest sites to the three monotheistic religions, they don't care. They fired at everyone.”

Thirdly, Netanyahu stated, Iran’s regime “fired an intercontinental ballistic missile 4,000 kilometers right into Diego Garcia, the American British base. They can reach down with these ballistic missiles everywhere in Europe, almost everywhere in Europe. I've been warning that for years.” This is why NATO needs to quit whining about Donald Trump and realize this is their war too.

Speaking of which, Netanyahu’s fourth point was Iran’s regime having “shut down the important maritime Strait of Hormuz trying to blackmail the world with oil — terror blackmail. Four things that they're doing in 48 hours.”

For Our VIPs: As Iran’s Regime Bombed an Israeli Kindergarten, the UN Posted About Eating Bugs

Netanyahu bluntly went on, “And I ask the leaders of the world, the leaders of the free world, the leaders of the moderate states, what more are you waiting for? President Trump has correctly said that Israel, that United States and Israel in this great partnership were fighting the battle not only for ourselves, but for all of you. And he asked a simple question, ‘Where are you?’ And it's time to heed President Trump's call, his leadership, and his vision not merely for our sake, but for your sake.” 

Operation Epic Fury, or Operation Roaring Lion, is taking on the world’s worst sponsor of terrorism. For half a century, the Iranian regime has had global impact. When will other nations recognize this is their fight whether they want it or not?

https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2026/03/22/netanyahu-48-hours-proved-iran-the-enemy-of-civilization-n4950930?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Perhaps the 'Squad' Progs Peaked Too Early

Perhaps the 'Squad' Progs Peaked Too Early

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Top O' the Briefing

Happy Thursday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Jorgetwzz was doing things with meatloaf and Fig Newtons that transformed the Hal Linden Devotion Society's monthly roundtables. 

One big reason that I am not a fan of attempts by Congressional Republicans to seek any kind of bipartisan compromise with the Democrats is that the Dems have moved so far left that anything they consider centrist is nowhere that sane, liberty-loving people want to go.

While the flying monkeys in the mainstream media love to write about nonexistent rifts in the Republican base, a real battle for the soul of the Democratic Party has been going on for the last seven years. The arrival of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Washington and the formation of her "Squad" began a tug-of-war between the old guard far left Dems and the youthful far, far left members of the party. 

Almost immediately, AOC and the Squad began using up all of the oxygen in the room. What they lacked in brains and accomplishments, they made up for with incessant noise that the MSM hacks couldn't get enough of. The elders of the Democratic village were completely caught off guard by the young ultra-proggies, and it seemed as if they might get pushed to the background. 

The once unchecked ascendance of the Democrats' radical left seems to be stalling out for the moment. This is from Rick:

Democrats across the country were watching the primaries in Illinois on Tuesday, trying to read the tea leaves to see what might happen in other federal contests.

What happened was that Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker impressively flexed his political muscle and brought several progressive candidates to victory, all of whom identified with the mainstream Democratic Party in Washington, D.C. 

Candidates who railed against Israel and were backed by radical groups like the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and Justice Democrats were buried in what may presage a backlash against the crazies within the Democratic Party.

Democrats won't release the "autopsy" of their crushing defeat in 2024, largely because the document skewers the radicals who took over the Democratic Party at the beginning of this decade.

This was, as my friend and HotAir colleague Ed Morrisey wrote, an "electoral wipeout of the hard Left" in Illinois. It came just a couple of weeks after leftmedia darling radical Jasmine Crockett suffered an ignominious Senate primary defeat to faux centrist James Talarico in Texas. If publicity alone won votes, Crockett would have won in a landslide.

In most discussions about the potential 2028 field for the Democratic presidential nomination, AOC still gets mentioned prominently. Even though she's not at the top of most polls, there are many people on the left who think she'll finish strong. The Democrats, however, are very good at mobilizing their power structure against candidates they would prefer not to win. If the money people and the old guard are trying to keep the prog kids in their places, the path to the nomination could get very bumpy for America's Dumbest Bartender. 

The proggie youth are nothing if not predictable. Ed's post goes on to note that the Squad types are blaming — QUELLE SURPRISE! — the Jews for Tuesday's clock-cleaning. That kind of unwillingness to back away from incendiary messaging won't serve them well in political trench warfare with the party power players who have far more experience at getting in the mud. 

As I wrote last month, Republicans will have hit the lottery if Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the Democratic nominee in 2028. After the last couple of weeks, it looks like her star may not be burning so brightly by then.

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/03/19/the-morning-briefing-perhaps-the-squad-progs-peaked-too-early-n4950809?utm_source=rsmorningbriefingvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Beware the 'Demonstration-Industrial Complex' and Its Connections to Foreign Funding

Beware the 'Demonstration-Industrial Complex' and Its Connections to Foreign Funding

AP Photo/Jen Golbeck, File

Ever wonder where those handsome, yellow, and black signs at left-wing protests emblazoned with the cause du jour come from? Who paid for them? Who printed them?

I can assure you that the cash didn't come from "Socialist Women For Palestine" bake sales or "Hands off Venezuela" walk-a-thons.

It's amazing how similar the anti-ICE, pro-Palestine, pro-Maduro, anti-Iran War, and anti-Trump protests appear. It shouldn't really surprise us because one left-wing umbrella organization is responsible for coordinating most of them. 

Organizing a protest beyond some neighbors turning out to demonstrate when ICE arrests someone is an expensive proposition that demands the time and dedication of dozens of committed activists. 

A vast network of activist groups with shadowy connections among themselves and to foreign actors is responsible for mobilizing these protesters. Astroturfing demonstrations are not against the law, although failing to disclose foreign funding is close to violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).

The ANSWER Coalition (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) coordinates most protests, including several demonstrations that have become violent. 

"A close look at ANSWER’s operations reveals a demonstration-industrial complex—a coordinated ecosystem in which organizations lean in to their respective strengths and complement others’ infrastructure, messaging, or reach," write Stu Smith and Tal Fortgang in The Free Press. "These organizations are, in turn, closely linked with hostile foreign actors, raising questions not only about their propriety, but their legality."

The Free Press:

ANSWER is a mobilization hub that links multiple activist groups, media platforms, and protest infrastructures. When a polarizing event erupts, ANSWER often coordinates the protests: setting times and location, promoting the gatherings through affiliated media outlets and social media channels, producing the customary black and yellow placards carried by demonstrators, and coordinating the messaging that makes fringe leftist positions appear mainstream.

ANSWER’s activities can and sometimes do turn from peaceful protest into civil terrorism—the strategic use of lawbreaking to effect political change through intimidation or coercion. ANSWER has been at the center of coordinated actions that seem to meet this definition.

In July 2024, for example, ANSWER led a protest that devolved into a riot in Washington, D.C. During the event, demonstrators blocked intersectionsstole and burned American flags belonging to the federal government, defaced the American Legion Freedom Bell outside Union Station, and spray-painted graffiti on a public fountain with the words “Hamas is coming.” The National Park Service, which had granted ANSWER a protest permit, revoked it after “the ANSWER Coalition violated—and encouraged others to violate—nearly every permit provision.”

The old saw, "Follow the money," is appropriate advice, but it's easier said than done. The gimlet-eyed radicals at ANSWER make the CIA circa 1972 look like amateurs. Front organizations, interlocking donors, and shared bank accounts are all used to shield (hide) the vast network of connections that make up the infrastructure of the demonstration-industrial complex. Fortunately, writers like Stu Smith are familiar with working the byzantine pathways that connect the groups and unlocking some of the doors that obscure these connections.

ANSWER’s protest activity is the product of a rapidly growing network of affiliates. The primary coalition partners that endorsed the March 7 National Day of Action to “Stop the War on Iran” included American Muslims for Palestine, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), National Iranian American Council, The People’s Forum, Code Pink, Palestinian Youth Movement, Black Alliance for Peace, and 50501. Some of these groups are becoming more radical as they grow closer to ANSWER. Since the capture of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro in January, DSA has increasingly co-organized with ANSWER, even calling them a partner. That’s despite DSA’s ostensibly mainstream reputation, in sharp contrast to ANSWER’s association with hard-left organizations.

By contrast, some affiliates look more like the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), a socialist political party that pursues the “revolutionary overturn” of the capitalist system. The PSL has many endorsed candidates running in this election cycle and was even able to get its presidential ticket on the ballot in 19 states in 2024. The PSL is closely linked with ANSWER not only by its affiliation but also through Brian Becker, the director of ANSWER "and a co-founder of the PSL. 

"Last month, the State Department sent a report to Congress detailing how Code Pink and The People’s Forum are linked to 'Chinese influence operations,'" according to Smith and Fortgang. Code Pink co-founder, Jodie Evans, is married to one of the primary sources of funding for all these networks, Neville Roy Singham, an American-born entrepreneur with close ties to the Chinese Communist Party. 

Singham sold his company in 2017 and is using the proceeds to develop what's become known as the Singham Network. "Through entities such as the United Community Fund and the Justice and Education Fund, Singham has directed money to a network of nonprofits aligned with his political outlook," explains The Free Press. The groups in the Singham Network "regularly amplify one another’s activities by promoting events, featuring each other’s leadership, and coordinating messaging across platforms."

All of this takes cash — a lot of it. Chinese Communist operatives have been busy in the U.S. these last few years, undermining democracy, exploiting our divisions, and pitting factions against each other. 

It's a symbiotic relationship; the Chinese want to create division and chaos to weaken the U.S. as a world power. The left-wing radicals want to create division and chaos to incite a crackdown that they can turn to their advantage in the streets. 

Two groups are looking to bring the United States to its knees. The government can handle the Chinese. We must expose these groups for the cynical hypocrites they truly are and unmask their funding sources to give everyone the full story behind their activism.

https://pjmedia.com/rick-moran/2026/03/18/beware-the-demonstration-industrial-complex-and-its-connections-to-foreign-funding-n4950773?utm_source=pjmediavip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Karoline Leavitt Ends Every Single Mouth-Breather Insisting Iran 'Was No Threat to America' in EPIC Post

Karoline Leavitt Ends Every Single Mouth-Breather Insisting Iran 'Was No Threat to America' in EPIC Post

AP Photo/Ben Curtis

Looks like Karoline Leavitt has had it with mouth-breathing panicans insisting that Iran was no real threat to America. Anyone who has been alive in the last 50 years should know Iran has been dangerous to the world, including America ...

Honestly, it has been bizarre watching people we used to look up to and trust side with Iran because ISRAEL BAD.

Leavitt said (wrote) it far better:

Post continues:

... explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first. 

This evidence was compiled from many sources and factors. 

President Trump would never make the decision to deploy military assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum. 

Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism.

The Iranian regime is evil. It proudly killed Americans, waged war against our country, and openly threatened us all the way up to the launch of Operation Epic Fury. 

Iran was aggressively expanding their short-range ballistic missiles to combine with their naval assets to give themselves immunity – meaning they would have a degree of a capabilities that would give them immunity to hold us and the rest of the world hostage. 

The regime aimed to use those ballistic missiles as a shield to continue achieving their ultimate goal – nuclear weapons. 

The President, through his top negotiators, gave the regime every single possible opportunity to abandon this unacceptable course by permanently giving up their nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, free nuclear fuel, and potential economic partnerships with our country. 

But they would not say yes to peace because obtaining nuclear weapons was their fundamental goal. 

President Trump ultimately made the determination that a joint attack with Israel would greatly reduce the risk to American lives that would come from a first strike by the terrorist Iranian regime and address this imminent threat to America’s national security interests. 

All of this led to President Trump arriving at the determination that this military operation was necessary for U.S. national security, which is why he launched the massively successful Operation Epic Fury.

The Commander-in-Chief determines what does and does not constitute a threat, because he is the one constitutionally empowered to do so - and because the American people went to the ballot box and entrusted him and him alone to make such final judgments. 

And finally, the absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable. President Trump has been remarkably consistent and has said for DECADES that Iran can NEVER possess a nuclear weapon. 

As someone who actually witnesses President Trump’s decision-making process on a daily basis, I can attest to the fact that he is always looking to do what’s in the best interest of the United States of America — period. 

America First.

And boom goes that dynamite.

https://twitchy.com/samj/2026/03/17/karoline-leavitt-ends-every-single-mouth-breather-insisting-iran-was-no-threat-to-america-in-epic-post-n2426113?utm_source=twdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl