THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 3/05/2024
Views on today’s, November’s
elections
My views on the supervisor contest: To tell you that, I’ll tell you this,
as they say. Through no fault of our own, we cannot vote in the March 5
primary. We routinely have mail forwarded north for ski season.
For good reasons, election ballots are not forwarded, which discourages
fraud. Too late for us, we found out that if we had changed our address with
the elections department, ballots would have been sent to our Oregon address. For
November elections, we’re always back in Red Bluff, after summer travels.
However, we live in District 3, which I found has no contest. Our
seer-of-all-local-things, Ms. Merry, “The Merry Mantonian,” has voluminous
information; also, actionnewsnow.com carried “Meet the candidates running for 3
open seats for Tehama County Supervisor” (Feb. 12).
I can only offer personal input, however irrelevant it might be. While
having nothing discouraging to say about her opponent, I have to share my
experience with Ms. Kris Deiters from back in my real estate days, covering
nearly 16 years in several offices and brokerages. Kris is fondly remembered as
an accomplished title officer whose expertise must be acknowledged.
While admittedly being out of touch for years, and having little input on
her handling of Tehama County’s issues, I would happily support Ms. Deiters
were I living in District 1 for no reason other than my experience with her
title officer conduct, which was exemplary.
Regarding District 2, I recall Ms. Candy Carlson showing up at our local
Tea Party meetings for Q and As, which struck me as indicative of a
publicly-minded citizen of our county, who saw a group of sincere patriots as
having something worthwhile to say. And she listened. I am likewise a bit
out-of-touch with her duties as a supervisor, and cannot gainsay her two
opponents, but I would probably support her if I lived in District 2.
Regarding District 5, I have nothing to say; I encourage voters to
self-inform.
***
Permission was granted to contribute some Donald Trump-oriented comments
to supplement the pieces from Republican candidate Nikki Haley and Democrat Ro
Khanna in Friday’s Opinion section.
Ms. Haley’s concern, for “where we’re (America) headed” as we approach
the 250th anniversary of our founding, is commendable if not
perfunctory. Her analysis of the state of our nation after 3 years of President
Joe Biden’s policies is spot on. If you missed it, do access her column; it
itemizes the irrefutable conclusions of failed, misguided and devastating
conditions imposed upon our nation.
As for Ms. Khanna’s anti-Trump diatribe, she starts by asserting, absent
proof, that “a Trump presidency will mean less diplomacy and more violence in
the Middle East.” The facts that are that 1) no violence or wars were initiated
during Trump’s term; and 2) the Abraham Accords established unprecedented
diplomatic recognition, by several Middle East Arab Muslim nations, of Israel
as a nation with which they no longer had animosity or military aggression.
Such illusory, disingenuous attacks represent such an aberration of, and
departure from, the truth as to disqualify her entire case against Trump, as
well as her glowing praise for Biden’s non-accomplishments.
Americans can see with “their own lying eyes” an open border allowing
daily entry of thousands of unvetted, unexamined “illegal aliens” (per Federal
Code). They are subsequently transported to distant locales, given housing,
food, medical care and cash—as well as court dates for asylum hearings so far
in the future as to be de facto legalization for residence, work and,
eventually, voting and citizenship, likely in that order.
America’s Southern border was, under President Trump, the most secure,
with the least illegal entries, in many decades. But for Democrat legal warfare
against it, Trump’s virtually impenetrable wall would’ve been completed and stand
forever as a bulwark against our current invasion of foreign migrants, many of
whom now disrespect our nation’s laws against violence aimed women, children
and officers.
Americans’ incomes exceeded inflation under Trump; real economic growth was
not spurred by bloated government spending—ironically counted toward
productivity when it is decidedly counterproductive to growth. Nations that now
view America as a weak target to be pushed around were, under Trump,
intimidated into respect and cooperation.
Finally, Ms. Haley asserted that Trump is unelectable, based on her apparent
animosity toward, and skepticism of, Donald Trump. However, the polling since
September—and the current New York Times/Sienna poll—indicate a nearly
indisputable win by Trump over Biden.
Trump vs. Biden approval: 44 to 38 percent. Registered voters choose
Trump over Biden, 48 to 43 percent. Hispanics choose Trump over Biden, 46 to 40
percent. Whereas Biden (and previous Democrats) received 90+ percent support
from Black voters, he only gets 66 percent to Trump’s 23 percent support.
Of Biden’s 2020 voters, only 83 percent support him, while 10 percent now
support Trump; Trump gets 97 percent of his 2020 voters while practically none
will vote for Biden. Unelectable? The polling shows Trump a sure thing; Biden
is apparently unelectable.
No comments:
Post a Comment