700 Special Ops Ask For Answers on Benghazi
Benghazigate
A group of 700 retired special operations military personnel have signed a letter to members of the House of Representatives, asking them to investigate the Benghazi debacle. You can read the letter here:
While the Obama cover-up has been successful so far, Benghazi still has the potential to dog the president’s second term, much as the Nixon administration was able to keep a lid on the Watergate break-in until after the election, but couldn’t stave off the scandal indefinitely. Of course, times were different then: the press was trying to bring the administration down, not prop it up.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/04/700-special-ops-ask-for-answers-on-benghazi.php
in A group of 700 retired special operations military personnel have signed a letter to members of the House of Representatives, asking them to investigate the Benghazi debacle. You can read the letter here:
The purpose of this letter is to encourage all members of the US House of Representatives to support H.Res. 36, which will create a House Select Committee on the Terrorist Attack in Benghazi. It is essential that a full accounting of the events of September 11, 2012, be provided and that the American public be fully informed regarding this egregious terrorist attack on US diplomatic personnel and facilities.The letter lists a series of questions that the House Select Committee should ask the Obama administration. I think they provide a good summary of the unanswered questions, most of them quite obvious, on which the administration has stonewalled, so far successfully:
1. Why was there no military response to the events in Benghazi?The signers of the letter note that as former special operators, they have a keen interest in what appears to be a case of Americans being abandoned in the face of enemy action:
a. Were military assets in the region available? If not, why not?
b. If so, were they alerted?
c. Were assets deployed to any location in preparation for a rescue or recovery attempt?
d. Was military assistance requested by the Department of State? If so, what type?
e. Were any US Army/Naval/USMC assets available to support the US diplomats in Benghazi during the attack?
f. What, if any, recommendations for military action were made by DOD and the US Africa Command?
2. What, if any, non-military assistance was provided during the attack?
3. How many US personnel were injured in Benghazi?
4. Why have the survivors of the attack not been questioned?
5. Where are the survivors?
6. Who was in the White House Situation Room (WHSR) during the entire 8-hour period of the attacks, and was a senior US military officer present?
7. Where were Leon Panetta and General Martin Dempsey during the crisis, and what inputs and recommendations did they make?
8. Where were Tom Donilon, the National Security Advisor, Denis McDonough, his deputy, Valerie Jarrett and John Brennan during the attacks, and what (if any) recommendations or decisions did any of them make?
9. Why were F-16 fighter aircraft based in Aviano, Italy (less than two hours away) never considered a viable option for disruption (if not dispersal) of the attackers until “boots on the ground” (troop support–General Dempsey’s words) arrived?
10. Were any strike aircraft (such as an AC-130 gunship) in the area or possibly overhead that would cause former SEAL Tyrone Woods to laser-designate his attacker’s position and call for gunship fire support, thereby revealing his own location that led to his death?
11. Who gave the order to “STAND DOWN” that was heard repeatedly during the attacks?
12. What threat warnings existed before the attack, and what were the DOD and DOS responses to those warnings? What data (which will reveal exact timelines and command decisions) is contained within the various SITREPS, records, logs, videos and recordings maintained by the myriad of DOD, Intelligence Community and State Department Command Centers that were monitoring the events in Benghazi as they unfolded?
13. Why did the Commander in Chief and Secretary of State never once check in during the night to find out the status of the crisis situation in Benghazi?
14. What was the nature of Ambassador Stevens’ business in Benghazi at the time of the attack?
15. What guidance has been provided to survivors and family members since the time of the attack, and who issued that guidance?
16. Why are so many agencies now requiring their personnel that were involved in or have access to information regarding the events that took place in Benghazi sign Non-Disclosure Agreements?
A longstanding American ethos was breached during the terrorist attack in Benghazi. America failed to provide adequate security to personnel deployed into harm’s way and then failed to respond when they were viciously attacked. Clearly, this is unacceptable and requires accountability. America has always held to the notion that no American will be left behind and that every effort will be made to respond when US personnel are threatened. Given our backgrounds, we are concerned that this sends a very negative message to future military and diplomatic personnel who may be deployed into dangerous environments. That message is that they will be left to their own devices when attacked. That is an unacceptable message.The signers of the letter are an impressive group, apart from their sheer numbers. They include two Medal of Honor recipients and five retired lieutenant generals, including William (Jerry) Boykin.
While the Obama cover-up has been successful so far, Benghazi still has the potential to dog the president’s second term, much as the Nixon administration was able to keep a lid on the Watergate break-in until after the election, but couldn’t stave off the scandal indefinitely. Of course, times were different then: the press was trying to bring the administration down, not prop it up.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/04/700-special-ops-ask-for-answers-on-benghazi.php
No comments:
Post a Comment