Don's Tuesday Column

         THE WAY I SEE IT   by Don Polson  Red Bluff Daily News   8/06/2019

        Fraud, scams and Google in elections

There have been a number of theories for why Donald Trump lost the popular vote. This column found that Hillary Clinton ran a nearly 5 million vote margin over Trump in the Los Angeles and Bay area counties. Outside the Democrat-heavy states of Illinois and New York, those counties in California alone delivered nearly 2 million more votes than Clinton needed for her 2.9 million vote win.

The number of fraudulent votes will never be known, primarily because the Democrat powers-that-be have no interest in either acknowledging the existence of vote fraud, or determining what proportion of votes “harvested,” under the laws like “Motor Voter” or AB 1921, “Vote by Mail (VbM) ballots,” were phony. Clinton’s entire 2.9 million popular vote win didn’t come from vote fraud in California but the same corrupt machine that delivered Chicago’s fraudulent/dead votes for John F. Kennedy—hence the state of Illinois and his election over Richard Nixon—hasn’t gone away.

Briefly, the laws cited above allow for paid vote “collectors,” unrelated to the actual voter, to use publicly available voting data to approach Democrat voters that haven’t cast their mail-in ballot, “help” them fill out the form and deliver it to any number of places described in the law, all legal. They can approach anyone sent a mail-in ballot but not motivated or informed enough to cast a vote, and do the same—filling it out, of course, with the Democratic ticket in mind.

What is not legally allowed, but also not easily discovered or punished, is using that process to “create” votes by those not mentally capable of filling out the form, or going through the motions for a house-bound Republican voter and then simply discarding the ballot. Vote “harvesters” don’t need to be citizens; they can essentially create votes by legal Hispanic voters that wouldn’t have otherwise voted—votes that, were the illegal alien not here, wouldn’t have been cast.

Republican volunteers, even paid volunteers, could use the same legal process to boost Republican voting margins but the state GOP inexplicably chose not to. Hence, last year in our state, numerous Republican winners with margins up to 15 percent on election night were slowly shocked to see their wins, by thousands-of-votes, turn into losses by as little as a few hundred votes.

Arizona has passed laws to disallow these VbM shenanigans; Democrats sued to void the laws. Even the liberal 9^th Circuit ruled in favor of Arizona—twice.

At Powerlineblog.com, blogger “Ammo Grrrll” described her young, idealistic experience when she and her boyfriend volunteered at an inner-city polling station (Chicago?). They noticed that voters would approach the poll workers, verify that they were on the roll, take a ballot, enter the private, curtained voting booth and emerge too soon to fill out the ballot. Odd but not illegal; maybe they only voted for one office.

On their break, they stepped outside and saw what was clearly not legal: A political or union “boss” at the head of a line of “voters” was given the blank ballot by the “voter” that had no time to fill it out inside; the next “voter” was given a filled-in ballot to hide on their person so as to go through the motions of “voting,” only to return with the blank ballot. After handing the blank ballot to the “boss,” they were rewarded with, say, $20 “walking around money.” Nice scam; nobody would report it.

Other voting scams and frauds are described in “Unlimited Ballot Harvesting” at countedascast.org. One person can deliver unlimited ballots to an election office, without even going to the precinct belonging to a given voter. Voter coercion can occur when someone’s boss, union chief or “other superior” says they want to see your ballot; decline and you’re out. “Megachurches, unions, and political groups have been holding ballot ‘parties’ for years, i.e. San Francisco in 2004 (sfgate.com).”

Senior homes and even Chinese speakers (sfgate.com) can be targeted to “help” them fill out their ballots; again, ballots not filled for Democrats can be discarded. “Automated forgery” can occur when digital copies of voter signatures (millions exist) are used, together with created copies of “VbM” envelopes and ballots, to generate massive forgeries. Publicly available data on nonvoters can be used to find out if someone isn’t going to vote, with enough time to “create” a proxy vote before polls close.

In “Former Google Engineer Says Google Will Try to Prevent Trump’s Reelection,” we read, “After the 2016 election, Google’s then-head of multicultural marketing bragged about attempting to boost Latino turnout, hoping it would help Hillary Clinton. Robert Epstein, a Ph.D. psychologist who studies search engine manipulation effects, found that Google’s bias can explain Clinton’s popular vote margin of victory.

“A Project Veritas video showed that Google’s ‘fairness’ project is intended to prevent another 2016. Last month, a Google engineer said the company’s search results are intentionally biased against Trump.”

“On Friday, former Google engineer Kevin Cernekee told Fox News' Tucker Carlson that his former employer will try to prevent President Donald Trump's reelection.

"Do you think that Google will attempt to influence the election outcome, attempt to prevent Trump from being reelected?" Carlson asked. "I do believe so," Cernekee replied. "I think that’s a major threat. They have openly stated that they think 2016 was a mistake. They thought Trump should have lost in 2016. They really want Trump to lose in 2020. That’s their agenda.” The former engineer also said Google has “very biased people running every level of the company. They have quite a bit of control over the political process. That’s something we should really worry about.”

Re: late news of mass shootings: It’s sad and evil but every word from Democrats and news people linking President Trump to shootings and white supremacy is a lie, including “and” and “the.”