Friday, October 31, 2025

Trump Administration Cuts Flow of Tax Dollars Funneled to Leftist Gun Control Orgs and NGOs

Trump Administration Cuts Flow of Tax Dollars Funneled to Leftist Gun Control Orgs and NGOs

woman horror fear scream angry comic cartoon vintage

The Trump administration has released solicitations for a grant program meant to stop gun violence in underserved communities. But this year, the non-profits the grant was built around are disqualified from applying, according to an application notice released by the Department of Justice (DoJ) in September.

The Community Based Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative (CVIPI), was created in 2022, to support groups working in rural and urban communities struggling to address violence and fund research studying the programs’ efficacy.

The pioneering program was born out of a recognition by the Biden administration that such community-centered programs were among the most successful tools in combating the US’ deep-rooted gun violence problem, and had played a crucial role in helping reduce homicides in major US cities.

Before Trump’s inauguration, community-based organizations, non-profits and local and state governments were eligible to apply for the grant. Now, only city, county and tribal governments are allowed. And the stated goal of the program has been changed from “comprehensive, community-based prevention” to “supports law enforcement efforts to reduce violent crime and improve police-community relations”.

Since 2022, the federal government has awarded more than $300m to over 120 non-profits, city and county governments and research institutions through the initiative, according to an archived list of grant recipients.

The department of justice, which oversees CVIPI, did not respond to a request for comment.

The changes at CVIPI are the latest in the Trump administration’s heel-turn from the Biden administration’s approach to gun violence prevention, which positioned Black and Latino-led groups working to address violence as legitimate solutions to crime in the nation’s hardest hit locales. Shortly after his inauguration, Trump dismantled the White House office of gun violence prevention, and in March his administration removed the former surgeon general Vivek Murthy’s advisory on gun violence as a public health issue from the US Department of Health and Human Services’ website

.https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/quote-of-the-day/trump-administration-cuts-flow-of-tax-dollars-funneled-to-leftist-gun-control-orgs-and-ngos/

DEAL WITH THE DEVIL: UK Muslim Tells UK Progressive This Brutal Truth

DEAL WITH THE DEVIL: UK Muslim Tells UK Progressive This Brutal Truth

AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali

"No we're not" was one UK Muslim's curt response to a well-meaning lefty's assurance that "We’re on the same side, bruv."

The moment was caught on video at a street protest in east London this weekend, where Islamic marchers insisted, "This is our country." The protest was more like a counterprotest against a protest that never happened, because Keir Starmer's Labour government often acts as though Britain is indeed an Islamic country. 

This is where things get complicated, right before they get funny, which comes a short (?) while before the inevitable bloodshed. 

So bear with me here.

The "far-right" UK Independence Party (UKIP) planned for a Saturday protest in London's Whitechapel district to “reclaim Whitechapel from the Islamists." According to a 2021 census, 43% of Whitechapel is Muslim, 26% no religion, and just 18% Christian. 

But British authorities used the Public Order Act to forbid the UKIP march. 

Commander Nick John, who is in charge of the public order policing operation in London this weekend, said, “Tower Hamlets has the largest percentage of Muslim residents anywhere in the UK and the prospect of this protest taking place in the heart of the borough has been the cause of significant concern locally."

"It is our assessment that there is a realistic prospect of serious disorder," he added.

Well, Whitechapel got a little disorder anyway, when Muslim counterprotestors — many of them masked — held their own march, complete with prayers to Allah, and chants such as "This is our country." Judging by who is officially allowed to do what in the streets, they likely have a point. 

Accompanying the Muslim marchers were hanger-on lefty organizations such as Stand Up To Racism (SUTR), the socialist Counterfire group, Antifa (of course), and the Socialist Workers Party (SWP).

It was a member of one of those groups who heard the chants of "This is our country," and responded with, "There’s no need for that. We’re on the same side, bruv."

Yeah, right up until the the UK's Islamic colonizers establish the Caliphate of al-Britāniyā.

I wish I were kidding, and I hope I'm wrong. But I'm far from the only person who looks at Britain's meek and shrinking Christian faith, compares it to the country's growing and increasingly bold Muslim community, and sees a dire future for once-Great Britain.

And the joke, unfunny as it is, is on the lefties who imagine themselves as allies with Islam.

"The left really doesn’t understand that they are going to be slaughtered when they have outlived their usefulness," Wall Street Mav posted to X on Saturday — and the irony should be anything but lost on them. 

The revolution always eats its own, and it's the "soft" elements that get marched to the guillotine, find themselves with their backs up against the proverbial wall, or are forced to dig their own mass graves. 

Look no further back than 1979, when Ruhollah Khomeini led an alliance of well-meaning lefty reformers and hardcore Islamists who toppled the Shah of Iran. The Islamists are still in charge, nearly 50 years later — and the last time you really heard from a reformer in Iran, a regime assassin put a bullet through her neck. Russia's Bolsheviks did the same to the Mensheviks, just as the French Republic devolved into the Reign of Terror.

If lefties knew enough about their own history to understand their fates, they'd be conservatives.

https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2025/10/27/deal-with-the-devil-uk-muslim-tells-uk-progressive-this-brutal-truth-n4945310

Masks Dropped for good. The unabashed, blatant, in-your-face corruption of King County, Washington.

Masks Dropped for good. The unabashed, blatant, in-your-face corruption of King County, Washington.

We have already heard the hundreds of stories of prolific offenders released over and over again by the thoroughly corrupt judges in King County. Nothing, even the fact that their own clerks are being assaulted on their way to work in downtown Seattle, seems to dissuade the leftist judges from their belief that the criminals are the victims of Society, and must be coddled and never face the consequences of their evil behavior.

The state government has made the state a Sanctuary for illegal aliens, and cities have followed suit. Cities are fighting the Trump Administration’s deportation orders, and flouting federal law happily.

Just the latest

But the story that takes the cake today is this sordid tale. Yes, the King County Jail has knowingly, in defiance of more than one Federal statute and policy, hired ILLEGAL ALIENS to work at the Jail! First, the illegals got into this country outside of the legal system (crime #1). Then the County hired them (crimes #2 & 3, since illegals are forbidden to work). The County had to have skipped the required background checks, which would have identified them as illegal and ineligible, (crime #4).

Lastly, the County refuses to terminate them! This is such blatant corruption, it’s hard to fathom! Think of it this way. King County now has individuals, in this country illegally and potentially spies, drug traffickers, or foreign agents, with power over American citizens! And vulnerable American citizens at that. Many jail employees carry guns, or have ready access to them. How simple might it be for those illegals to conspire together to attack other employees, or start jail riots, or murder the high-ranking staff?

Here are another response to this X story.

More corruption

And more.

The Left has no limiting principle, and will do whatever they can to get and keep power, up to and including encouraging an invasion of our country, putting illegals over citizens in law-enforcement, and inciting riots and murder. Aided and abetted by the legacy media, who carry water for them.

People need to wake up, before America as founded is destroyed completely, and citizens reduced to slaves. They have told us what their goals are. Time to stop them from achieving those goals.

https://rushbabe49.com/2025/10/23/masks-dropped-for-good-the-unabashed-blatant-in-your-face-corruption-of-king-county-washington/

Thursday, October 30, 2025

After the Purges and the Wars: Why Russia Keeps Running Out of Tomorrow

After the Purges and the Wars: Why Russia Keeps Running Out of Tomorrow

AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko

Like a led zeppelin, Russia's population is falling fast.

In 2024, Russian births fell to a 25-year low, barely reaching 1.22 million. Calling it a "national threat," the Kremlin has repeatedly tried offering incentives for having children: cash bonuses for new parents, abortion restrictions, and bans on "child-free propaganda" have failed to bend the curve.

Slogans can't hide the hard truth: Too many people have died, too many women have left, and too few believe the future is worth having children for.

By the end of this decade, the labor ministry is forecasting a worker shortfall; nearly one-third of Russian citizens are already over 55, which places a spotlight on an aging, shrinking nation trying to wage a modern war that looks less like an empire and more like a hospice with missile launchers attached to walkers.

Europe’s Warning From a Century Ago

You would think Russia has already learned the lesson. Over one hundred years ago, Europe quickly learned the hard way how a population loss reshapes power.

France and Germany suffered demographic collapse after World War I: France lost nearly 1.4 million births on top of deaths on the battlefield, meaning the generation coming of age by 1939 was basically skeletal in size.

The workforce and tax base in Germany were also thinner, which forced political radicals to exploit resentment rather than pursue reform.

The lesson stuck: When a nation runs out of sons, it also runs out of options. A baby boom helped Western Europe rebound after 1945. For the Soviet Union? 

Not so much.

Nearly 27 million Soviets died in the war; many of them were young men, the very age driving both recovery and reproduction, generating a scar that lasted decades.

While the West built suburbs, the East buried its youth and rebuilt its fear.

Purges, Famines, and the Long Shadow of State Violence

Even before Operation Barbarossa, Stalin's terrible purges hollowed out the population. Millions were wiped out during the 1930s purges, the very same demographic capable of rebuilding afterward.

Next up were the gulags, political cleansing, and the quiet mass graves marking every decade of Soviet control. Each wave didn't only erase entire families, but also family lines, creating what demographers call "missing generations."

The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia repeated the same pattern in the 1970s, killing a quarter of its population, leaving behind a nation that limped for decades. Bosnia's ethnic war in the 1990s killed over 100,000 and shattered its fertility rate.

When a government murders its own or drives them to flee, it's not just destroying today, it's bleeding tomorrow dry.

What Russia Is Trying, and Why It’s Failing

Looking more like a sermon than a strategy, Putin's latest demographic revival included medals, subsidies, and patriotic slogans to solve the problem.

Doctors in some regions of Russia are being punished for "coercing abortions," and state television praises the idea of a large family, calling it a "national duty."

Despite the push, ordinary Russians offer the same reasons others do for having children: no money, no stability, and fathers returning home from the front. Nobody can raise children on decrees and propaganda.

You need peace, jobs, and most importantly, hope.

War Makes Every Trend Worse

The Russian/Ukraine war amplifies every weakness. Russian battlefield deaths are estimated to be more than 200,000, and have caused hundreds of thousands more men of draft age to flee to Kazakhstan, Georgia, and Europe in hopes of avoiding conscription.

Even if some decide to return, it will be to a home with a limping economy that's coping with sanctions and labor shortages. A loss in Ukraine ripples through families, empty cribs, and unmanned factories.

No nation can fight two wars—one abroad and one against its own demographic clock—without losing one of them.

The Consequences for the West

We can't assume that a shrinking Russia will become harmless. Young populations aren't needed to use nuclear stockpiles and cyber weapons. History shows that insecure powers lash out when the decline becomes too big to hide.

Years of exhaustion and demographic stagnation followed the 1991 Soviet collapse; Putin's Russia is facing a similar reckoning.

The proper response for the United States and its allies isn't celebration; it's steadiness: Keep pressure on sanctions, support Ukraine's defenses, expand domestic energy production to blunt Moscow's leverage, and, above all, stay patient.

Russia's decline isn't a sprint; it's math. 

And math, when it's not acting racist, always wins.

Final Thoughts

Ideology doesn't give two hoots about the math of decline, which only cares about life and death, and birth and absence. Europe learned that lesson after the First World War, when graveyards filled faster than nurseries.

The Soviet Union learned it under Lenin, then again under Stalin, and now, Putin is learning it firsthand. Here's a simple equation that repeatedly gets lost over time: You can't threaten a population into growing; you can only inspire it.

In Russia's case, Putin has run out of inspiration.

https://pjmedia.com/david-manney/2025/10/25/after-the-purges-and-the-wars-why-russia-keeps-running-out-of-tomorrow-n4945266

Do Actual Facts and Evidence Matter Anymore?

Do Actual Facts and Evidence Matter Anymore?

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

One of the frustrations I have when I get into political (or many other kinds of) arguments is the essentially fact-free nature of the discussions. 

Not so much when it comes to discussing problems we want to solve, although often enough, the problems are exaggerated or completely made up (like the whole "gender confusion" debate), but on the other hand, whether proposed "solutions" actually work. 

It often seems that gauzy, empathetic-sounding slogans are sufficient to move people to accept the most absurd arguments, claims of fact, and to ignore the obviously bad or useless results of whatever "solution" was created. 

Think about some of the most pressing issues of the day, or just about any public policy proposal that people push. 

Homelessness is a great example. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been poured into "solving" the homeless crisis, yet the problem only seems to get worse, and the actual plight of those who live on the streets gets worse. Cities are turned into trash heaps, people are dying on the streets, and petty crime skyrockets wherever the homeless congregate. 

And the crime isn't only petty at times. 

Yet politicians like Gavin Newsom only have to wax poetic about his plan to eradicate homelessness, and he gets applause, and taxpayers keep writing checks to fund a homeless industrial complex that is making bank while things get worse. 

Drug abuse is the same. As people die in the streets, "harm reduction" programs give away free needles, crack pipes, and even drugs in some cases, on the claim that helping people rot to death is a kind solution. 

Transportation? Everybody is frustrated by traffic congestion, but billions of dollars are poured into "traffic calming," which has the explicit goal of driving cars off the streets by increasing congestion. Billions are poured into flashy projects, but in many cases, the congestion gets worse, the streets are ill-maintained, and the only result is higher taxes and more spending on projects that are designed to fail. 

California High Speed Rail, anybody? 

What about "affordable housing?" People have been talking about "affordable housing" for decades, but most of the laws and regulations are designed to provide subsidized but very expensive housing to government clients, while raising prices on new home construction. Urban planners set zoning rules and implement plans that, on their face, are designed to spread Democratic voters to formerly Republican areas (notice how the suburbs went from Red to Blue as "affordable housing" was built in these areas?), and suburban areas in many areas start getting problems that used to be urban?

I get particularly frustrated because the evidence is there for all to see, but the response from people who refuse to see it boils down to this: it is "mean" to oppose these efforts that obviously don't work. Liberals talk about compassion, or "the children," but the results they provide are always more expensive and much worse than before. 

Have I no compassion?

It's absurd. We keep pouring money into school systems that perform worse every year, and produce an ever-more-confused and mentally ill generation of kids who can't decide what sex they are. That is even harder for them to figure out than who was president during the Civil War—if they even know America had one. 

Instead, liberals start talking about making public schools full-service mental and physical health facilities, promoting "Social and Emotional Learning" to children they have made as anti-resilient as possible in the first place. 

Give us money to "solve" the problems we created. 

Government is an industry that thrives on failure because it is rewarded. The worse things get, the more it can take in taxes to "fix" the problem. What Department of Transportation DOESN'T want you frustrated by traffic congestion? It's hard to ask for tax increases unless people are angry enough about how bad the system is to agree to it. 

Lots of homeless people on the streets? We have a program for that. Let's spend more!

All of this is obvious, yet somehow the words liberals spew matter more than the facts before our eyes. It's as if empathetic words are magical incantations, and hard truths are too difficult to face. 

This, I think, is why all the warnings in the world about obviously dangerous consequences of stupid policies get ignored. Nobody wants to say that providing thousands of dollars a month in EBT cards, free housing, and all the benefits of welfare for years will encourage sloth. 

It's obviously true—it's human nature—but it's mean to say it. 

Multiply this attitude across all the major societal discontents, and you get an increasingly dysfunctional society. Results don't matter, so in government nobody aims to get good ones. 

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/10/25/do-actual-facts-and-evidence-matter-anymore-n3808187?utm_source=twdailyamvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Mamdani Is Just the Start, Brace Yourselves for What's Next

Mamdani Is Just the Start, Brace Yourselves for What's Next

AP Photo/Richard Drew

We’re just days away from the New York City mayoral race. Communist and foreigner Zohran Mamdani, who identifies as a “Democratic socialist,” is in the lead to win. He's never had a job, but he's about to land a big one. 

Many have argued a Mamdani win will be “good” for Republicans, especially ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The claim is Mamdani’s radicalism can be used to corner Democrats as extreme and out of touch with regular Americans. This may be true in some cases, but it’s a dangerous game and one Democrats like Chuck Schumer are already losing. The government has been shut down for a month because establishment Democrats are terrified of their left flank - doing exactly what they want to "fight Trump" while waiting for "planes to fall out of the sky." 

But back to New York. 

Mamdani is a jihadist version of Che Guevara, and the Democratic Socialists of America are training candidates just like him to run for office. They're in a hot pursuit for power over the Democrat Party and ultimately, the United States of America. 

“Since 2016, the DSA has been steadily building political power, learning how to win elections and creating a formidable field operation. Their campaigns are not amateur efforts. They are run by seasoned operatives, staffed with disciplined and ideologically committed volunteers,” the Canary Mission reveals. “The DSA’s most effective weapon is its calculated use of the Democratic Party as a Trojan horse. By disguising hardline socialist candidates as mainstream Democrats, DSA activists slip into power through low-turnout primaries in deep-blue districts. Once in office, they push an agenda far outside the mainstream.”

“That agenda includes abolishing police, prisons and border enforcement; weakening the U.S.' foreign alliances and prioritizing foreign extremist causes over public safety at home,” Canary continues. “Within DSA, hatred of America and its institutions is a badge of honor. Members call the United States a ‘dying empire’ and describe their duty as ‘facilitating the defeat of our own nation.”

Mamdani is on the record promoting and calling for global Intifada - murder. He sympathizes with Hamas and other Islamic terrorist organizations. He adores the architects of 9/11 and applauds those who celebrated the slaughter of thousands. His father, Mahmood Mamdani, a Columbia University professor who shaped his political ideology, believes in normalizing suicide bombings. 

“We came here to remake this state in the image of our people,” Mamdani said during an underground planning meeting in New York, covering his face.

Mamdani is a test of the system. If DSA can take over one of the most important cities in the world, they can do almost anything. Especially because they believe in violence as “resistance.”  These types of candidates are taking advantage of the American democratic process in order to get into the system and destroy the country from the inside out. Their tactics are greatly destructive, damaging, and alarmingly effective. Their goal is to tear down the "empire" of "imperialist" America, and they are well on their way.

https://townhall.com/columnists/katiepavlich/2025/10/24/mamdani-is-just-the-start-brace-yourselves-for-whats-next-n2665440?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

When Did It Become Taboo to Defend One's Own Culture?

When Did It Become Taboo to Defend One's Own Culture?

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

There is much to be said about defending our culture. One means of doing so is making sure the people we allow to become American citizens share our cultural vision. It’s something we’ve intentionally not been doing, I’m afraid. The thing is, such defense is the line-one function of any government that wants to survive for long. 

Back in the '90s, I wrote:

1: Who invented the concept of government?

2: What purpose would that entity have had in such creation?

One way we can answer those two questions at once would be to look at what existed as the most powerful force before government was invented, and therefore what was the most likely inventor of government: CULTURE.

If we make the logical assumption that governments were originally created by the individual cultures, then it follows that each culture constructed their respective governments in their own image… governments that best reflected and advanced each culture’s interests.

The original purpose of government, therefore, is to protect, nurture and defend, and if possible expand the influence of, the culture that gave it life. As such, to the greatest of degrees possible, each government’s laws, on the whole, were the culture, codified. It follows, then, that any government holding to the original purpose of government will perform this task.

Now, notice I said to the greatest degree possible. I freely admit… Trumpet, even, that there are no perfect governments, no perfect laws. No law, or government can ever capture in amber, a culture. Cultures are far more complex than any law, however written, can encompass. So it is that laws cannot be the end-call and be-all to a culture, or to a country. Laws when taken too literally and made to apply to all events uniformly, can instead of being just, will instead dispense injustice.

It is said that in hell, there will be law and policy and little else. Yet, this imperfect tool did at least manage to provide a mechanism toward the intended purpose… The furtherance of the culture that founded said government. This understanding that there is imperfection in government implies that other values should supersede governmental power when the tool of government doesn’t fit the task at hand well. I submit the highest value applied here should be the values of the culture, not that of the law.

(Which, I would argue is why there are judges which read not only the wording of the laws but then intent of them.)

Europe as a whole is now paying the cost for not performing that key function: not defending its culture. They are also our coal-mine canary. We are seeing civil unrest and a good deal of anger directed at the respective governments across Europe because of the supposedly enlightened idea that all people, regardless of cultural background, share common values. As time has gone on, the Europeans have painfully discovered that no, we do not.

Now, before you start tuning up, understand: This has nothing at all to do with race. Ninety-nine percent of what gets passed off by the social left as race hatred is instead cultural friction. I can think of no better example of the dangers of essentially unrestricted cultural importation than this Patriot Polling data from Oct. 19:

2025 NYC mayor election poll, Patriot Polling | 10/18-10/19:

Among American-born New Yorkers:

  • Andrew Cuomo: 40%

  • Zohran Mamdani: 31%

  • Curtis Sliwa: 25%

Among foreign-born New Yorkers:

  • Zohran Mamdani: 62%

  • Andrew Cuomo: 24%

  • Curtis Sliwa: 12%

(Let’s leave aside for the moment the mind-bending idea that Andrew Cuomo is, between him and Mamdani, the saner choice. I promise you, I will address that juicy topic at another juncture.

I mentioned the UK particularly, and perhaps that’s a good place to start an examination of such things. AP’s Danika Kirka says in a recent report: 

LONDON (AP) — Britain has been convulsed by violence for the past week as crowds spouting anti-immigrant and Islamophobic slogans clashed with police. The disturbances have been fueled by right-wing activists using social media to spread misinformation about a knife attack that killed three girls during a Taylor Swift-themed dance event.

The violence, some of Britain’s worst in years, has led to hundreds of arrests as the government pledges that the rioters will feel “the full force of the law” after hurling bricks and other projectiles at police, looting shops and attacking hotels used to house asylum-seekers.

Right-wing activists? Islamophobic? Interesting choice of words to describe folks who simply expect the government to look out for their interests, and yes, their very lives, since that same government has removed any means of self-protection. (Maybe here we see the futility of expecting government to protect the individual?)

We see the same thing happening in IrelandFranceGermany.

Wherever this discussion comes up, the immediate, knee-jerk response is a charge of racism. Of course, that’s not the issue at all, but those leveling it apparently feel that it shuts down all conversation about open borders and financial support for illegals, among other similar issues. (Islam, for example, is a race?)

The solution to these conflicts is demanding cultural assimilation. If you want to come here to take advantage of our cultural largesse, then it seems only fair that you are required to actually become part of our culture. I recognize that assimilation has become the third rail of American politics, particularly among the left, who usually respond to the promotion of our culture with catcalls of “White Supremacy.” Rich Lowry, back in 2019, made the case for assimilation in National Review:

The worst thought crime is the one you don’t realize you’re committing.

So it was with NBC News legend Tom Brokaw, who — for good reason — didn’t understand that assimilation is now a third rail of American politics.

He caused a furor with comments on the venerable Sunday news program Meet the Press over the weekend, including, most controversially, his statement that he believes “that the Hispanics should work harder at assimilation.”

The condemnations were swift and sweeping and a sign that being a beloved media figure who has never before said anything that could legitimately be considered bigoted is no defense when the furies descend.

It was Presidential Medal of Freedom to white hood in one sound bite. A group called Latino Victory hit Brokaw for allegedly giving “credence to white supremacist ideology.”

Typically, his apologies were deemed insufficient and part and parcel of the original offense.

Let’s stipulate that using a definite article to refer to any minority group will always strike people as tone-deaf, but what Brokaw was getting at — the importance of assimilation to cultural cohesion — should be uncontroversial.

It isn’t anymore. The head of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists rejected the very idea of assimilation, which he decried as “denying one culture for the other.” It is astonishing that in that formulation “the other” is American culture. We are perhaps the only nation in world history that has sought to “otherize” its own culture.

Rich goes on to point out that the idea that immigrants should assimilate is the complete opposite of xenophobia — it is an expression of a belief that they can be and should be fully part of the American mainstream. Which they will never be, absent assimilation. And Brokaw, for his part, pointed out at the time that we have set up an immigration system that is set precisely against that key element. In other words, our government has set up an immigration system specifically designed to NOT protect our unique American culture.

Related: Louvre Heist Encapsulates a Western Culture That Will Not Defend Itself

Furthermore, many, if not most, Western cultures have done the same thing to their own cultures. Europe has been leading the charge here. It's almost like some external force is directing this change, where individual societies are not able to defend and nurture their own cultures. Such a force would need to be well-financed. I can think of one group of people who fit that description. 

We are supposed to be the cultural melting pot. It’s time we were again. Our cultural survival depends on it.

https://pjmedia.com/eric-florack/2025/10/24/maybe-immigration-without-cultural-assimilation-isnt-a-great-idea-after-all-n4945206