Sunday, August 31, 2025

After the deadly Minneapolis school shooting, it’s time to stop indulging delusions – and talk truth about transgenderism

After the deadly Minneapolis school shooting, it’s time to stop indulging delusions – and talk truth about transgenderism

Robert Westman was an unwell boy who, in 2019, decided he was a girl and officially changed his name to Robin.

Westman was a minor at the time so his mother, Mary Grace Weston, signed the application.

Video grab from the livestream of the 2021 graduation ceremony for Southwest High School, Minneapolis Public Schools, showing the school portrait for Robin Westman.
Video grab from the livestream of the 2021 graduation ceremony for Southwest High School, Minneapolis Public Schools, showing the school portrait for Robin Westman.Minneapolis Public Schools/YouTu

This is the second such attack by a transgender person on a Christian school.

In March 2023, Audrey Hale killed six people, including three children, at the Covenant School in Nashville.

Killer ‘brainwashed’

If any other mental condition produced a pattern of murder, we would collectively discuss and decide on strategies to help those ailing.

But there’s no discussion allowed about what to do when a child declares themselves transgender. No one may point out that gender dysphoria is often a symptom of a much larger mental health problem.

The American Medical Association, a professional group of physicians that has become a wholly political entity in the last few years, only suggests one path, that of “gender-affirming care” — and urges that “forgoing gender-affirming care can have tragic health consequences, both mental and physical.”

A CNN special from 2015 had a parent of one trans kid ask, “Do I want a living son or a dead daughter?”

That formulation — either accept your child’s gender transition or they’ll die — has coerced parents into pursuing the hormone blockers and surgeries that are banned in most western countries, but not in the USA.

There’s an incredible amount of pressure on parents to take the only path considered acceptable and to lean into their child’s gender dysphoria.

Parents have lost custody of kids if they chose not to “affirm” their gender delusion.

It’s madness.

We don’t know yet what kind of “gender-affirming care” Westman was receiving, or whether brain-altering hormones were involved, but we do know he was having regrets.

In a YouTube video, Westman shared a journal entry: “I am tired of being trans, I wish I never brainwashed myself.”

But no doctor will be held accountable for this.

No therapist who encouraged an impossible “transition” will lose their license because their mentally unstable patient killed himself and took two children with him.

The rest of us are left to piece the story together, and pick up the pieces.

Did the doctors who helped Westman transition know he would walk around saying “heil Hitler” in middle school, rattling the other students?

Was the underlying depression ever treated?

Or did everyone assume that letting Westman pretend to be a girl would be enough?

The numbers keep showing that the AMA-approved path of “affirmation” is producing ever more children who believe they are not their birth sex.

In the years between 2017 and 2021, the number of kids receiving a diagnosis of gender dysphoria tripled.

In 2024, 3.3% of American high schoolers referred to themselves as trans, and another 2.2% questioned whether they might be.

When nearly 6% of kids suddenly struggle with their gender, it’s clear we’re in the throes of a social contagion — one that is encouraged by the grown-ups around them.

Nobody wants to be unkind toward someone suffering mental anguish.

But indulging delusions isn’t the solution to any other mental-health issue.

When someone has a “hysterical pregnancy” and believes themselves to be with child when they actually are not, we don’t ready a nursery and start thinking of baby names.

Yet this kind of pretending is exactly what we’re all expected to do when someone believes they were born in the wrong body.

People suffering from gender dysphoria don’t get the treatment and counseling they need to help them get better — but are “affirmed” every step of the way and encouraged to hold tightly to their mistaken belief about who they are.

‘Common humanity’

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who is in danger of being ousted in November from his position by someone even further to the left, declared no one should be mentioning that the shooter was trans.

“Anybody using this as an opportunity to villainize our trans community or any other community out there has lost their sense of common humanity,” he railed Wednesday.

But what Frey, like so many others on the left, has lost is his sense of truth and reality.

The truth is important, whether it’s telling children they can’t actually change their gender or admitting we’ve seen an uptick in trans people committing terrible crimes.

Compassion should go hand in hand with honesty — not pretense.

https://nypost.com/2025/08/28/opinion/after-the-deadly-minneapolis-school-shooting-its-time-to-stop-indulging-delusions-and-talk-truth-about-transgenderism/

Fake News Replaced by Fake 'Experts'

Fake News Replaced by Fake 'Experts'

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

The new method of journalism is to wake up, scratch yourself, announce this is what I think and then find someone who agrees with you to cite as an "expert." This honorific is generally given either to slobbering simpletons, like John Brennan, or anonymous nobodies on the left. If you see "expert," you should assume the person is not an expert, and probably not even a person.

Here's how to do a story on "water isn't wet" in less than 40 minutes:

Get a college professor on the phone.

Hello. I'm from The New York Times and I'm looking to quote an expert saying water's not wet.

That is correct, water is not wet.

Why?

Because it isn't.

Is this something you've studied?

Oh my gosh -- I'm a world-renowned expert.

To your editor: I've got an expert saying water isn't wet.

Do you have more than one?

Throw a rock out the window, hit someone. Hey! Sorry about the rock. I've got a question for you. Is water wet? Yes? Ask the guy next to you. Got it, perfect.

Headline: "Water Not Wet, Experts Say."

Nowhere is the explosion of phony experts more annoying than in the bloated ranks of foreign policy hacks. It's as if the world decided to solve the problem of "elite overproduction" by creating a full employment program for them as government bureaucrats and quotation providers.

Thus, a recent Times article accused Donald Trump of "Flying Blind" by stripping the government of high-quality intelligence experts, horrifyingly, just as he's trying to end the Russia-Ukraine war. Instead of relying on experts, as other (obviously better) presidents have, Trump, the Times reports, "has taken a different approach ...: He's fired them."

Meaning he will not be deferring to people whose sole objective in life is being quoted in the Times. Without losing accuracy, the cited authorities could all be identified as professors of Trump-Hating.

To prove what a nightmare Trump's housecleaning is, the Times quotes the very sort of experts he's sidelining. Evelyn N. Farkas at the McCain Institute in Washington, D.C. (very confidence-inspiring) said of the expert-less administration: "They're flying blind without the expertise." Amazingly, that's just what the Times thought.

Because only true "expertise" could get us to spend $2.313 trillion over two decades to turn Afghanistan into the exact same country it was when we invaded -- except with an extra $7.1 billion in U.S.-made weapons -- or, in a mere three years, cost us $180 billion and tens of thousands of dead Ukrainians in order to give Vladimir Putin an even stronger hand than when he first invaded. (Hey, maybe we're getting better at this!)

New definition of "expert" updated by me 10 seconds ago: "Someone who agrees with us, preferably who's been repeatedly proved egregiously wrong."

Farkas says the Trump rejects "have seen all the intelligence relating to Vladimir Putin's intentions. They have spies on the ground. They know all kinds of information that's gained through technical means." OK, but eventually we're going to need an example of something these guys caught that won't be caught now. Otherwise, it's more like: "Titanic shareholders strip their back-office of iceberg experts."

The Times is especially alarmed that Trump has "purged experts" from the National Security Council. Yes, the same NSC that is so chockablock with experts that Joe Biden added a special envoy on climate. Please God, tell me Trump didn't fire that guy. Because whenever I worry about keeping America safe from deranged autocrats, my first thought is, "How's the weather?"

As if Trump is nursing some ancient grudge, like the Greeks and the Turks, the Times describes the pink-slipped NSC experts as those who worked on the "nearly decade-old investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election."

Of course, the reason it's a decade old is that these nincompoops have been noodling almost nothing else for the past decade, rather than, say, wondering if Hamas had anything up its sleeve. It took these experts 10 years to prove that the Russians did not steal the 2016 election. It only took me about 20 minutes.

We all should hold a grudge against those guys.

Where did the Russian interference yarn come from, anyway? It was cooked up by Barack Obama's director of national intelligence and admitted perjurer James Clapper to distract from the cache of DNC emails released by Wikileaks -- no connection to Russia -- that were extremely embarrassing to Hillary Clinton. That's what highly trained expertise gets you.

The Times' final water-is-not-wet expert is Marc Polymeropoulos, a former CIA officer, meaning he knows less about what's going on in the world than anyone who was not a CIA agent. Polymeropoulos, according to the Times, said "Mr. Trump did not want to hear intelligence reports about Russia's bad acts" and blamed Laura Loomer for the expert bloodbath.

Amazingly, that was just what the Times thought! Has The New York Times ever attributed expertise to anyone it disagrees with?

Put aside the fact that Polymeropoulos was a "long-time Middle East specialist" -- and there hasn't been a ruffled feather over there since then. Also put aside his claim that after living all over the world, when he finally went to Russia in December 2017, he "experienced panic and helplessness for the first time." Sounds very stable and reassuring.

This guy claims he has "Havana Syndrome," a well-known psychosomatic hysteria. It's the male version of long-haul COVID.

How is Trump going to function without high-level experts like these?

https://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2025/08/27/columnistsanncoulter20250827fake-news-replaced-by-fake-experts-n2662445?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

The Uncomfortable Facts We Can’t Ignore

The Uncomfortable Facts We Can’t Ignore

AP Photo/Abbie Parr

Another school shooting. Another community shattered. This week in Minneapolis, a former student walked into Annunciation Catholic School during morning Mass and opened fire—killing two children, wounding seventeen, and leaving families forever altered. Police later confirmed what was already circulating: the shooter identified as transgender. 

It wasn’t the first time. In 2023, a former student opened fire at The Covenant School in Nashville, killing three children and three adults. That attacker, too, was identified as transgender. 

When individuals who are already vulnerable to mental distress, social alienation, or violent ideation also struggle with questions of identity and radical online communities, the mix can be combustible. That is a fact worth examining soberly—not sensationalizing. 

This leads to another uncomfortable but necessary question: what about the medications involved in gender transition—puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones? Do they contribute to instability or violent behavior? 

The truth is troubling. Reviews of puberty blockers (GnRH analogs) in adolescents point to significant concerns about bone health, fertility, and psychiatric effects, all in the context of a thin evidence base. These drugs were developed for entirely different uses and remain experimental when applied to gender-questioning youth. 

Cross-sex hormones—large, lifelong doses of testosterone or estrogen—are even more destabilizing. Reports link them to mood swings, aggression, mania, and psychiatric breakdowns, particularly in those already struggling with mental illness. Clinical protocols recommend caution precisely because of these risks. The claim that such treatments are “life-saving” or stabilizing is not supported by serious long-term evidence. What we do know is that they carry profound physical consequences and introduce further volatility into already fragile lives. 

There is another reality that makes this discussion urgent: transgender individuals as a population face significantly higher rates of psychiatric conditions, including psychosis, depression, and suicidal ideation. Much of this appears tied to social stressors—rejection, victimization, and isolation—but the introduction of powerful drug regimens into such instability cannot be brushed aside as irrelevant.

Still, when a person at elevated psychiatric risk is handed highly experimental treatments, placed in the middle of heated culture wars, and exposed to the copycat incentives of online fame, the risk for tragic outcomes rises. That doesn’t make every transgender individual a threat. It does demand that policymakers, physicians, and parents exercise vigilance. 

The Minneapolis and Nashville killers shared patterns common to many school shooters: detailed planning, fixation on prior massacres, online leakage of their intentions. These are the warning signs that threat-assessment teams, parents, and peers must be equipped to recognize and act upon. If we focus only on identity labels, we will miss the obvious red flags staring us in the face. 

Every serious analysis of mass shootings emphasizes prevention over politics: take leakage seriously, empower schools and families to intervene, and cut off the fame-seeking cycle that inspires the next killer. 

I do not write these words lightly. There are some who will accuse me of stigmatizing an already stigmatized group. Others will insist I went too soft by refusing to declare transgender identity itself as the culprit. Both groups will miss the point. 

My calling is not to make readers comfortable—it is to tell the truth as best as we can discern it. That means recognizing that transgender shooters, though rare, cannot be ignored. It means acknowledging that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones carry serious psychiatric and physical risks that deserve scrutiny, not blind celebration. And it means refusing to let culture wars obscure the urgent work of saving lives. 

Uncomfortable facts are still facts. If we are serious about preventing the next school massacre, then we must pursue the whole truth with sober minds and open eyes. Anything less would be a betrayal to the children whose names are now etched in memorials instead of class rosters. 

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2025/08/28/the-uncomfortable-facts-we-cant-ignore-n2662448?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Saturday, August 30, 2025

Dems Think They Have Found the Answer to Their Woes, but It Could Be the MOAB - Mother of All Backfires

Dems Think They Have Found the Answer to Their Woes, but It Could Be the MOAB - Mother of All Backfires

AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr.

If most Republicans are truthful, it has been a ton of fun watching Democrats flail about with no leader, no realistic message, and continuing to reap what they sow by ignoring the American people. It has also been beyond stunning to watch them double and triple down on ridiculous policies that voters, by a resounding margin, told them they were not interested in. Our most recent chuckles have come from clips from the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) summer meeting, and their most recent penchant for breaking out in song at Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protests. But an old idea may be coming out of the mothballs.

The latest in the "what can we throw up against the wall to see if it sticks" saga was kicked around at the summer meeting. The idea: to hold a national Democrat mini-convention before the 2026 midterm elections. The purpose, of course, would be to fundraise, but also put the party on a national stage for Democrats running in crucial House and Senate races. Such a convention would garner maximum media attention as Democrats attempt to win majorities in the House and Senate and present arguments against President Donald Trump and the Republicans' agenda.


READ MORE: Trump Raises Massive Amount for GOP As Cash-Strapped DNC Works to Pay Off Harris Campaign Debt


While the idea is in the early stages, and nothing is definite, DNC Chair Ken Martin has been shopping it to party leaders. As 2026 looms, Martin is in the hot seat. The Democratic Party has a significant cash-on-hand problem. At the end of the first half of 2025, Democrats have $15 million on hand, Republicans have $80 million. That is a whopping $65 million gap that can't be ignored. Adding to their cash woes, the DNC made what was described as a "handshake deal" with former Vice President Kamala Harris to pay off her roughly $20.5 million campaign debt. 

Democrats lost the presidency, the House, and the Senate to Republicans, the party appears to be struggling to find its footing and is looking at Communist and Socialist voters to bail them out.

The midterm convention idea is a moldy oldy one for Democrats. Conventions were held in 1982 in Philadelphia and in 1978 in Memphis after the midterms, but the party scrapped midterm conventions in 1986, after it was argued that it was a waste of time and energy. But now, Ken Martin is tasked with pulling a rabbit out of a hat for Democrats.

So, is a pre-midterm convention, where potential 2028 presidential candidates could mix and mingle with party leaders and donors, a good idea? Given the favorability rating of the Democrat party, which, according to Real Clear Polling, is at 34 percent, and the fact that they effortlessly find every rake to step on, it could also blow up in their faces in a way they never anticipated.


ALSO READ: DNC Summer Meeting Shows Exactly Why They're Failing

Dems Double Down on Idiocy As New Poll Shows Huge Popularity of Trump's Crime-Fighting Efforts


National media attention, of course, means that the propaganda arm of the DNC, the media, would have a huge collective tingle up their leg, and coverage would be as if 50-seat majorities in both the House and Senate had already been won. But what it also does is again showcase just how out of touch with real Americans the Democrat party is. My colleague Nick Arama reported on the goings on at the DNC summer meeting, including a stolen land acknowledgment and a classic Tim Walz meltdown. It's a pretty sure bet that a summer 2026 Democrat convention would be a never-ending parade of illegal immigrants, drag queens, and people like Vera Institute of Justice Vice President Insha Rahman, telling the crowd that "migrant crime and carjackings don't matter to that many Americans."

Democrats have the distinct aroma of desperation, so a summer 2026 convention might be getting some serious consideration. How generous of them to offer up a voter's guide of who to steer clear of in 2026.