Thursday, April 25, 2024

Alan Dershowitz No Longer Feels Loyal to the Democratic Party

Alan Dershowitz No Longer Feels Loyal to the Democratic Party

AP Photo/Richard Drew, File

On Monday, famed lawyer and Harvard Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz announced he no longer feels any loyalty to the Democratic Party in light of its tolerance of antisemitism.

During an interview on the “Just the News, No Noise” show, Dershowitz expressed profound disappointment in his party's failure to address the pro-Palestine demonstrations at Columbia University that have been ongoing since last Wednesday.

“We're hearing nothing from Democrats. We are hearing nothing from Chuck Schumer,” Dershowitz explained. “We're hearing nothing really direct from President Biden. He made a very disappointing statement. In the same breath, he talked about the demonstrators in passing and he said, ‘but you have to understand the Palestinian situation.’ No, you don't have to understand the Palestinian situation. When people are calling for rape and murder and beheading. The Democrats are an extraordinary disappointment."

"I am no longer presumptively voting for Democrats," he added. "I'm gonna vote for whoever is the best candidate, that may include Democrats, but I have no loyalty anymore to the party.” 

Dershowitz criticized college admissions practices and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies, which he argued have contributed to the recent issues observed at prestigious universities.

Related: Joe Biden Only Pretends to Care About Anti-Semitism

“Many of the students [protesting] today are unqualified students,” Dershowitz said. “They were admitted because of DEI. They were admitted because Qatar and other Arab countries are paying for foreign students. These are not the best and the brightest students, they are the loudest students, but they're certainly not students who are looking out for the best interests of America.”

The former Ivy League professor additionally claimed that Jewish students are being treated like “third-class citizens,” and that what has erupted in the country over the Israel-Palestine war is worse than the January 6 riot on Capitol Hill in 2021.

“What we're seeing is something that I believe, and this is going to be very controversial, I believe is potentially more dangerous than January 6, which was terrible, and than Charlottesville, which was terrible,” Dershowitz said. “Because those didn't involve as many students, not as many elite people, as many future leaders. We're hearing the future leaders of America chanting ‘We are Hamas.’ In other words, ‘we are rapists. We believe in raping Jewish women. We are beheaders. We are kidnappers. We are murderers.’ That's what they're chanting. And these are people who will run for Congress ... 10 years from now, who will be partners at law firms, and who will be working in the editorial rooms of CNN, and the New York Times.”

On Sunday, the Orthodox rabbi at Columbia University and Barnard College issued a statement advising Jewish students to flee campus and return home for their own safety because of ongoing demonstrations by anti-Israel activists.

Rabbi Elie Buechler, director of OU-LJIC at Columbia/Barnard, urged students via WhatsApp to leave campus "as soon as possible" prior to the onset of Passover. He emphasized the urgency of the situation, noting that "what we are witnessing in and around campus is terrible and tragic."

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/04/22/alan-dershowitz-no-longer-feels-loyal-to-the-democratic-party-n4928420

HHS, National Archives Hit With Lawsuit After Being Caught Deleting Emails of Former CDC Employees

HHS, National Archives Hit With Lawsuit After Being Caught Deleting Emails of Former CDC Employees

AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough

The Biden Administration is facing a lawsuit after it allegedly deleted several emails of federal employees from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in violation of the Federal Records Act. 

American First Legal, a conservative legal nonprofit, sued the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the National Archives and Records Administration, accusing the agencies of illegally destroying federal records from the CDC in an attempt to dodge the truth. 

In a 55-page lawsuit, the legal team claimed that destroying or mishandling such records of employees 30 days after they leave is illegal under the act. 

“The CDC destroyed records it determined were unimportant,” AFL vice president Dan Epstein said in a statement. “However, as this lawsuit shows, the CDC, like any other person who destroys government records, may not evade the law. The Archives and the Department of Justice have a statutory responsibility to apply the law fairly to all persons.”

America First Legal used several examples to defend its argument that the Biden Administration is guilty of leading a double standard, citing special counsel Jack Smith's prosecution of former President Donald Trump allegedly mishandling classified documents after he left office. 

“You have maybe tens of thousands of government records every year that are destroyed without authority," Epstein told Fox News Digital. "But when it comes to Donald Trump, he gets prosecuted. Everyone else who doesn't have to stand for election gets a free pass."

Another example the legal group referenced included former FBI agent Scott Payne who deliberately deleted highly classified law enforcement records from the agency’s database.

“A former FBI agent kept all of his official investigative files at his home and simply faced a slap on the wrist from the Archives,” Epstein said. “However, a former president who sent personally designated records to his residence was subject to a criminal investigation and prosecution instigated by the Archives. The rule of law cannot mean one set of rules for unelected bureaucrats and another for democratically-elected officials who happen to be a political challenger to the sitting President.”

The National Archives claimed that each CDC employee can determine which emails they want automatically deleted once leave.

“The CDC instructs individual email account holders to apply retention based on the email’s content value and its applicability to a NARA-approved records schedule,” the agency said.

However, American First Legal stated that it is “patently inconsistent with the law.”

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/04/20/hhs-national-archives-hit-with-lawsuit-after-being-caught-deleting-emails-of-former-cdc-employees-n2637986?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=15803c7fc8c68b6fd1f0a5e7f4b59fc49df45d48335d4339ad60f7b0a0c7404d&recip=28668535

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Here’s Why the J6 SCOTUS Hearing Matters

Here’s Why the J6 SCOTUS Hearing Matters

AP Photo/John Minchillo

Yes, the Jan. 6 case being heard by the Supreme Court is important and relevant to your life. It could influence not only Donald Trump’s case, it could well prove a defining moment for all Jan. 6 cases. It is a moment to decide if political dissent is allowed or if it is criminalized. 

We all know there is a double standard in our judiciary now. Peaceful pro-lifers and Trump supporters are prosecuted and persecuted with far greater harshness than literal murderers, child rapists, and Antifa rioters who burned down cities. The main question for this J6 hearing now is what decision the Supreme Court will make. Even aside from the verdict, what arguments will be made? How will the case be framed? Can all Trump supporters rely on the Supreme Court to be objective and reject political persecution? Or will the rights and freedom of every individual who publicly challenges the party currently in power be at risk?

The events of Jan. 6, 2021, continue to be controversial. Enough evidence has now emerged that we know the overwhelming majority of protesters that day (including some facing years in jail) were peaceful, and lawyers have stated that some individuals accused of violence were arguably defending themselves from police brutality. But whether the J6ers have been accused of violence or merely being present, whether they snapped selfies or shouted at police, whether they never entered the Capitol or moved furniture around the halls of Congress, they are all still American citizens with certain rights. And those rights have, in a number of cases, been shockingly violated.

Over 1,300 people have been arrested in connection with Jan. 6, and arrests continue even into 2024, three years later. There have been multiple J6 prisonersreports over the last few years of inhumane conditions, being denied not only rights but necessities like medical care, and being treated worse than terrorists. Congressional investigation confirmed the shocking treatment.

As an opinion piece in The Epoch Times previously noted, some arrests of Jan. 6 prisoners evoked “Gestapo tactics.” Trump supporters are indeed too often treated as “guilty until proven innocent and [as] undeserving of the basic civil rights that all other Americans are supposed to be afforded under the Constitution.” FBI agent Steve Friend was so disturbed by the FBI campaign against Jan. 6 protesters that he ended up becoming a whistleblower. Dinesh D’Souza particularly highlighted the shameful treatment of J6ers in his movie “Police State.” 

As I summed up in another piece:

Peaceful protestor Raymond Chambers entered the Capitol for only three minutes on Jan. 6, 2021, but he now faces jail time; and several other J6ers with “viable defenses” were convicted around the same time. Jan. 6 prisoner Jake Lang has been in jail for three years, often in reportedly abusive prison conditions, without trial, [and his prison conditions have only worsened]. He and other J6ers, including Philip Anderson, recently said on Twitter/X that they cannot expect objective justice as long as Joe Biden is in office. Regardless of whether a January 6 prisoner actually did commit violent crimes or is completely innocent, he has certain rights under the Constitution, including the right to a speedy trial. That right is being violated.

Recommended: Shellenberger: Brazil’s Spiral into CCP-Like Tyranny Should Scare Americans

Yes, the arguments being heard at the Supreme Court for ex-police officer Joseph Fischer are very important, and they are applicable to your life. We have seen Brazil’s rapid spiral into authoritarianism, but, as journalist Michael Shellenberger warned, the United States — under Joe Biden — is heading down the same slippery slope. If there is no objective justice, free from political bias, for the Jan. 6 protesters, then how is any citizen safe? If America is no longer a country of laws but a country of politicians, a country at the mercy of whoever is currently in power, how can we remain free?

https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2024/04/16/heres-why-the-j6-scotus-hearing-matters-n4928221

Biden Admin Faces Heat After Announcing Drastic Plan That Fuels Radical 'Climate Change' Agenda

 

Biden Admin Faces Heat After Announcing Drastic Plan That Fuels Radical 'Climate Change' Agenda

AP Photo/Susan Walsh

The Biden Administration is facing heat after announcing on Friday that it plans to block oil and gas drilling across millions of acres in an Alaskan reserve. 

The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) outlined new restrictions on oil and gas reserves along 13 million acres on a petroleum reserve in Alaska, claiming the move will conserve land that is important to the “Alaska Native people” and the “fish and wildlife.” 

“Following significant engagement with the public, Alaska Native Tribes, and Alaska Native Corporations, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) finalized the Management and Protection of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPR-A) rule that will ensure maximum protection for significant resource values on the more than 13 million acres of Special Areas in the western Arctic, while supporting subsistence uses and needs for Alaska Native communities,” the agency said. 

Just days before Earth Day, the restrictions would confine over 13 million acres of public land within the National Petroleum Reserve (NPR-A) as part of the Biden Administration’s radical climate agenda. 

According to the DOI, the regulations as proposed would create an outright prohibition on any new leasing across 10.6 million acres of the area, equivalent to about 40% of the entire NPR-A. They would additionally require the DOI subagency the Bureau of Land Management to review whether to expand protected areas or create new protected areas in the NPR-A at least every five years.

Under the administration's actions curbing development in the NPR-A, future oil and gas leasing and industrial development would be strictly limited in the vast Teshekpuk Lake, Utukok Uplands, Colville River, Kasegaluk Lagoon and Peard Bay – "special areasknown for their rich wildlife populations on Alaska's North Slope. DOI said closing the land off from resource development would help protect various wildlife species, including caribou. Via Fox News Digital. 

Biden appointee Secretary Deb Haaland credited “science” in the department’s decision to remain committed to ensuring “that places too special to develop remain intact for the communities and species that rely on them.”

State Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) called the move an “illegal” attack on the state’s oil and gas industry.

“Today we are here to discuss how the Biden administration is fine with our adversaries producing energy and dominating the world’s critical mineral markets while shutting down those in America,” Sullivan said. “Living in the most dangerous times since World War II… [Washington has allowed] dictators in Beijing, Moscow, and Tehran” to “undermine our national security interests. The Biden administration is not normalindeed this administration is deliberately undertaking policies to punish Americans and undermine our strengths while continuing to help our adversaries.” 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/04/20/biden-admin-to-block-millions-of-acres-in-alaska-from-oil-gas-drilling-n2638058?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=15803c7fc8c68b6fd1f0a5e7f4b59fc49df45d48335d4339ad60f7b0a0c7404d&recip=28668535